I remember watching the news with my mom as a kid I couldn't of been more than 10 years old. The story was about the man who fueled his car with water. I vividly remember my mother saying that this is going to change the world. Then nothing. I brought it up it up with my friends getting stoned a few years back during our college years and everyone thought I was crazy and they said the story never existed. Like I just made it up. I felt like it was some crazy Mandela effect until I ran across this clip. Thank you, Joe. I really thought I was losing it... lol Edit: To all of the people who have said I could of just "googled" it. You are absolutely correct. I was referring to a time when dial up internet was still a thing and people's first instinct were not to just run to the internet to validate information. Life happened and after seeing this clip reminded me years later of this news story.
Been years but i remember a talk with a phd...he claimed that there wr +/- 900 inventions(to improve mileage) bought&shelved.Lots of them wr bought by General Motors
@@Astrodicted I remember watching a documentary YEARS ago about two guys working on improving gas mileage. Their test vehicle was a Triumph TR-6. They used common parts from wrecking yards. If memory serves, they were able to achieve 150 mpg. I've never seen the doc again.
My family knew the water dune buggy guy. My wife’s grandfather helped him do presentations. She herself took a ride in it. That actually was a real thing.
@@LuisMartinez-hj2cu no. They wouldn’t. I wish everyone was in the right paths on this stuff if they are interested… The car still exists today.. he was killed for being way past his time. And yes he could’ve changed the world and he would be the richest most known if everything was going his way.. after he died. Everyone stole his invention. Even the military… why it’s not being used or being sold as a full car at dealers? Nobody will know or even car to find any of this out. Have a good day 😀
@@jimgordon3468 Im not lying. I don't know the technology and I wasn't there but my wife literally took a ride in the water fueled dune buggy and her grandfather was partners with him.
Here's one for the record books: My grandfather once told me about an engineer at GM that created a roller-bearing engine. Basically, this engine would last 30 years, because it would negate the damage slide-type bearings do as an engine deals with friction and heat. This is why cars only last 10 years or 200,000 miles. Most engines are not designed to last longer than that before the main bearings and rod bearings give out, due to the bearing surfaces having no metal left on them. Because he worked for GM, they took his idea and shelved it, as a roller-bearing engine would shut down the profits made from new cars.
Thats guys rly common thing in technology of all kind in this era. Look at your phone, all good until one year goes by and all of a sudden you camera making way worse qaulity photos etc etc. Everything what is sold out massively is being designed like this. Crazy world we live in but wat can we do.
@@ogshane6163 : It's called "pre-planned obsolescence." It's why, in 2008, Ram broke off from Dodge, part of now-Stilantis Corporation (previously Daimler-Chrysler). Literally, Chrysler made the transmission on 2009 Dodge Rams so bad that they would give out after only 12,000 miles. We are talking about an automotive component assembly that is supposed to handle hundreds of horsepower and torque, and last for hundreds of thousands of miles. Yet this same component in a 2009 Dodge Ram lasted hardly at all. I actually read about a guy who bought a Dodge Ram at that time brand new, and he ended up replacing the transmission 3 times in one year.
They were just separating hydrogen from water and combusting it.... Problem is it takes more energy to extract that hydrogen and burn it than it gives back. It was BS Thermodynamics 101
@@Preacher_. no it doesn't. What does that have to do with thermodynamics??? Dafuq? You can literally seperate hydrogen and oxygen particles (H2O) with a 6volt battery.
@@Lunatic5306 it's called Electrolysis... The problem is, it takes more energy (regardless of wether it's in a battery or not) to separate the hydrogen and oxygen molecules, than you'll get back by combusting that hydrogen. And yes, you could use Solar Power to power the Electrolysis(which creates alot of heat, and heat = energy loss), to turn water into hydrogen & oxygen. But at that point you're better off skipping the hydrolosis, which bleeds alot of energy as heat & just using Solar power to charge a battery, and draw power from that battery. Thermodynamics is a bitch.
It's probably true. Look at the light bulb, they had to dummy it down or it would last 100 years... in fact there is still a light bulb thats been on for over a hundred years in a firehouse somewhere.
There was an old bloke here in New Zealand, who, in the 70’s invented a car motor that ran on water. It was well documented and in local papers. He could not sell his ideas or get it off the ground. When he died (of natural causes) all his research, schematics etc disappeared from his home. He was old school, everything was in folders, boxes and cabinets in his garage. I came across his story again (along with many others), years later in a book called “suppressed inventions and other discoveries”
Also: there is always a story about a water powered car, or a carb that made 100mpg. Every nation has one, every generation. I have heard it....hundreds of times. Always a different person. Always 'they' bought the patent or tech. Always died mysteriously. All patents filed are searchable. They describe how it works. After 20 years you are free to replicate it. Even if they buy the rights and shelve it. Go to Google patents and ace down the patents yourself. There are quite a few, so try and narrow it down.
I heard of a guy in my nz town who was doing that said it had to be "virgin water" that had been in the earth for 100years and was negatively charged and pure. Would use the spring on my friends farm to run his lawn mower. Said it worked off implosion and had to run the engine 180 degrees out if phase so the implosion would suck the piston up. He may have also changed it to a 2 stroke not sure.
@@joshcoray3777 The funny thing is hydrogen cars and trucks are on the road today. If it is scaled up more it may actually become cost effective. I had a conversation about it with someone at work. He brought up the tale of the "water powered" car you are referring to I asked if he was talking about a car with a hydrogen fuel cell or maybe an ICE that burns it. He was like "not hydrogen, water" but could not tell me how the technology worked. I don't really mind or get aggravated talking to people who believe wild conspiracies. I don't want to hear that shit all the time but it can be pretty amusing!
@@BiggerFatterBlog yes it does,,so much so a few companies are out there doing h20 conversions and you can fill up with ocean water also...do your research
@@BiggerFatterBlog they also said Tesla was impractical so nobody retraced his steps and reinvent what they shelf and use in prototype. Electricity can travel through soil just a random mention.
@@3rd-eye-neenja563 you can split water with a 9v battery. So seems a solar panel roof, hood and trunk lid, would produce enough hydrogen and oxygen while your car just sits at home or work to drive locally.
That's the future when we fuck one another with nukes we're going back to the stone age. Just imagine your descendant in the future travel like that yaba yaba doo!
I have seen 3 or 4 stories just like this over the last 15 years. Inventors creating engines where cars are running off of air, some off water. But in the end, the inventors always go missing, or come up as having a suspicious death.
Retired old men think they did something and die of heart attack. Last guy was a victim in a shooting and people think they did all that to kill one guy…..people are idiots.
Bloom Energy is still alive! They call the “bloombox” an Energy Server now. They are fuel cells that create electricity from natural gas or biogas (without combustion.) They range from 200kW to 300kW output at 480V. They’re great for steady, reliable baseline energy. Look them up!
I'm only 30 and I remember the bloombox I thought for sure it was going to take off. It uses natural gas if I remember right. Don't we have so much that we are exporting it?
electromechanical stuff exports have gone up, while imports have gone down 2.9 trillion cubic feet imports vs 3.5 tcf exports. Almost a wash. And just a small fraction of US domestic production/consumption
@@gwaaiedenshaw8310 import/export it's all going down now. Looks like the green new deal/ agenda 21 got exactly what it wanted. Airlines are on brink of financial collapse, reduced population, reduced automotive transportation. It's all their in black and white
Yea, sure the "car company killed it" conspiracy or "it's the oil company" conspiracy. No, just simple physics. Thermodynamics is a bitch. But yeah, in that sense, it was rigged because you're not going to beat or defeat thermodynamics no matter how clever you have convinced yourself you are. If you think you've beaten thermodynamics, then you've overlooked something or gotten it wrong.
@@robertmiller6444 just because something is clever or innovative doesnt mean it defies thermodynamics. These things couldve functioned off fairly conventional means.
There’s been quite a number of people who have made cars run on water. Basically you make a small hydrogen generator on the trunk (in simple terms you just put an electrical current in water and split the molecules). Lots safer carting around a tank of water and creating a small amount of hydrogen at a time as opposed to carrying around a tank of highly volatile Hydrogen.
Ok and how do you provide enough electric energy to produce the hydrogen? Do you know how much electricity it needs to do electrolysis? That's the reason why Toyota's solution doesn't get adopted. You're better off using this electricity to recharge a battery and then feeding it to an electric motor.
@@ricklopez7151 I think you had better consider what it is that you are doing that might require someone else's attention. If what you are doing is a REAL THREAT to whomsoever, then yes, indeed, it would be time to exercise a tad of paranoia. If you are merely self-harming, then don't waste your time. Unless 'they' are truly stupid. . . . Of course _you may not know_ they're coming out to get you. . . .OK, be as paranoid as you like. . . . . :)
I had a boss, farmer who was 72 in 2003. He said during the depression, tractors like the single cylinder lanz bulldog hot bulb diesel could be run ON MILK. Not melted cream but STRAIGHT MILK. Had no power to pull a plow or anything but you could drive around your farm to check your sheep and see they had water, drive to town or whatever.
I remember telling a coworker about this technology a couple years ago and he acted like I had made the whole thing up, Yeah I'm the crazy one! Well Robert here you go asshole! SEND
@@JohnstasBACK yeah and? Running spotify reduces the amount of data your using and also you can turn your screen off so you save more battery life. This is very helpful for me as a truck driver. Losing the comment section sucks but I don’t listen to joe for the comment section. Also you can skip thru all the ads, youtube you can’t and the ads are getting longer and there’s more of them.
My grandfather knew a man from our home town that put an Australian tractor motor inside of his car making it go 99 mph while being fuel efficient. Four companies tried suing him for “safety reasons” let’s be real, no they weren’t. Fortunately, he was given five million to never do it again but he had to move away. This man would’ve been breaking the industry if it wasn’t for oil companies, some evil stuff man.
I was told that diesel was SHOCKINGLY cheap back in the day. Insyead of beong over the price of petrol, it was 1/3. And with diesels, you take less liters to go the same distance. There were few trucks that ran on it but they could be bought. This old guy was greek and he used to be trucking stuff from Adelaide to Melbourne. He was still making significant profits at half the price of everyone else. He got a second truck and ran the pants off both of them with 3 other drivers. He would do one run, have the other guy drive it at night or whatever and 2 guys alternating on the second truck. Become fairly wealthy out of it. So it's likely it was simply a diesel car, using a diesel tractor engine. Crap acceleration but brilliant efficiency if you match the gearing to the weight correctly.
@@jasonhaiflich8967believe me you do something like that even with no press sound gonna get out 🗣️ and when people with suits are the ones who represent they oil company or someone from the car industries if you don’t sell out you probably ended 🆙 dead ☠️ 😅😅😅😅😅
back in the early 2000 I also hear these news about engines that run on Air or Water... but that was it, it never flourish. but heres the thing, these engine will BANKRUPT the super rich oil industry. who are the 3 biggest oil companies? Shell, Exxon Mobile, and chevron right? what would you do if you own an oil company? these invention will destroy your business, a car that does not run on gas but runs on FREE water and air? that will not only be used on cars but boats, ships, probably even planes... you will definitely go Bankrupt! your only choice is to BUY it for millions of dollars (thats cheap compare to how much billions of dollars they make a year) and then hide it, and keep your business running. So YES! corporate oil industries will try their hardest to acquire those inventions because that is a threat to their income.
They forgot to mention after the guy who created the car that ran on water died, there was a break in at his house and SHOCKER all of his research dissapeared.
I grew up in denton, tx..a big college town with large liberal arts and science schools..there was a UNT professor I grew up a few houses down from and he had a mid/late 80's Toyota pickup he was constantly working on and improving to get as good of gas millage as possible and still be a completly road worthy vehicle..made a fiberglass bed covering and front ends that looked like an upturned kyak on the truck..changed suspension, stance, balance everything..he had and worked on this truck for 20+ years and last time I'd heard which was around 2005-06 he was averaging 110 mpg and maintaing an acessable top speed of 84 mph...he did all this on virtually no budget intentionally and was in no way a commercial venture...made all his notes available to anyone all to show it can be done affordable and rather simply and surprisingly dependably...I last saw him maybe 5 or 6 years ago and it was still his daily driver..had to have a huge ammount of miles too...amazing what can be done when your free to experiment without restricts and restraints put on you by the commercial or beautocratic sectors
Love when Joe says "if you were a conspiracy theorist what would you think happened" And he replies "Oh I'm a small business realist and someone shelved it"🙏
@@Thedamped That's because you believe the CIA to have been created in 1947. Agent Skully shiowed me indisputable proof that the CIA was crfeated at least 230 years earlier. So put that in your pipe and smoke it!
Love this shit man. My Dad and I would have these same conversations. Pre-internet he was telling me about some of this stuff. He even mentioned floating and steamed power cars from his day which I was able to find footage of online years later. Miss my Dad, thanks for these podcasts man. Peace
@@getchasome6230 An yet they've already had this as well, in the form of tollway taxes. Which is basically a tax for using the road ways. They'll always come up with some new bull shit to tax though.
I remember seeing Stan Meyers on NBC back in the mid 70s and was really excited about it, and then heard nothing more until the internet came along and reminded me of him and I was able to catch up on that rabbit hole. If it was good enough to be on NBC news, then surely it must be true. ;)
My step father and his friend invented a machine that would pick up heavy crude oil on water after an oil spill. Shell bought the patent off them with promises of more money when it went into production. It was shelved. It was cheaper...more profitable to lose all the oil and claim the insurance.
@@1realtruthrightnow742 I agree! This has always been the problem with the world. There are so many world-changing inventions that have been bought and shelved by large corporations but never saw the light of day. Products that could have changed the world for the better Including cures and drugs for cancer. And other illnesses but the illness is more profitable than the Cure. Very sad.
Interesting! I worked on these a few years ago, same boxes pictured. They're misrepresenting them a bit here, they're Natural Gas Fuel Cells and use a chemical transfer process through a number of ceramic plates instead of a combustion process. Really smart dudes working on it, they do definitely work but it's not "free energy", you have to feed them a NG pipeline. Clean energy, but very expensive.
About 16 years ago I worked at the Baltimore - Washington Airport. A co - worker , an older middle aged man, told me that his friend made a car that ran on potatoes. He drove it around Baltimore, Maryland. People saw the car, and saw that it worked. He died mysteriously and this man said he thought someone in the oil industry murdered him, while tears rolled down his face. Another co - worker told me her neighbor was an inventor and he was rich, but you did not know, because he walked around in overalls. He built an engine that used 30 percent less fuel, 30 percent less oil. Someone from the U.S. government paid him millions of dollars not to build it and not to patent it and not to sell it. He took the money. She told me this about 16 years ago too.
@@blindi6326 I'm sure there wasn't much of a choice for the guy...more like a threat. It really sucks how the government controls so many aspects of our life without us even realizing it.
My uncle who passed away in 1974 told me he new of a guy in the 50's that invented a carburetor that could get 75 MPG and that an oil company bought the patent and shelved it.
Famed stock car racing mechanic Smokey Yunick had what he called an Adiabatic engine that got 100MPG in a Dodge Omni. Believe it or not, it was invented by a General Motors engineer. He offered the idea to GM, they considered it carefully and turned it down. So he asked if it was ok to give it to Smokey and they told him to go ahead. Smokey Yunick had a long association with Chevrolet and Pontiac racing teams and knew a lot of executives and engineers in Detroit. To get the results he got, he needed to run the engine very hot. This made it very efficient when it came to turning heat into energy but it meant if the slightest thing went wrong you could burn up your motor in the blink of an eye.
Every major city had trolleys like San Fran. Ford and Firestone bought them and scrapped them for metal. Forcing the public to buy their product. Cars and tires
Yeah, it's a fun conspiracy theory based on some fact and coincedence but that's not exactly how it happened. A surging middle class and the consumerism of a vibrant post war america drove (no pun intended) people to explore the country and achieve the dream of a new house and shiny big car in the garage. did major corporations play a role? of course they did, especially in LA (Roger Rabbit, anyone?) however it was a confluence of world events and the upward mobility or a previously struggling middle class that really killed railcars. Because as the middle class became more successful they left the big cities. Which led to urban decay as the suburbs became popular and only poor and minorities still lived in the cities.
p d You mean where the population density is way higher? See Europe has certain advantages, a major one being that it isn’t separated by ridiculously huge sections of just rural “nothingness”. Another being that it is fairly homogenous in culture and ideals. This all adds up to them having nicer things in some regards. But in other regards the USA has just as many advantages. Usually for the exact same reasons. Cheaper housing would be an obvious one.
They also lobbied for the term "j walking." At the time roads weren't built for cars, they were large sidewalks for things with legs, horses, people, farm animals. To sell cars they had to get people off the streets.
Prep or Die yes! I should of read the comments first! He was at a meeting with GM or Chrysler execs and it wasn’t the first time he met with them. I believe his brother is still telling his story! Oh and his car was stolen when they got back.
Stories like this scare the shit out of me because I’m always working on things that will revolutionize the world but it’s a dangerous game. If they don’t buy you out they can shut you down. Permanently
I knew a guy in Florida who was his friend ( Stanley Meyers) and investor. He rode in the water car. Also he had a torch, welder that ran on the same tech. I’ve seen it and it worked.
Why do I even bother? Why do I comment on RUclips? Am I trying to show the whole internet how clever I am? Who cares? What a waste of time. Look at my dog. I roped him into this.
@@godforreal7355 type In hydro tech water HHO generator Torch it was about 12 years ago when I saw Meyers Machine. They are being produced around the world now in different versions. Even cheap ones on sale on Amazon LoL
yup and after his death, everything just 'disappeared'. Not to mention his Car that ran on wireless energy that he wanted to implement together with his Wardenclyffe Project. JP Morgan famously saying “if anyone can get electricity anywhere, then where do we put the meter?”. And thus killed the project in its infancy.
@@laylobinson5839 Even the rare Tesla journals that were found by random folks years after Tesla's death. Theirs stories that "people" came asking and took the journals.
Stop the Tesla wackiness. He was brilliant and he deserves credit for some of his innovations, but lots of is ideas were far beyond practical and common sense
Interrlestingly enough the generator assist is what all the dodge rams after 2020 use. A retro fit system would be very, very difficult to do as it'd have to be made for every specific model, the generators might be easy but the integration would be hard. A way more promising one that's on the market are electric backends for cars.
@@Edwar3505 Hell, electric cars been around forever, but ICE took off instead. Can't exactly remember the reason why, but wouldn't be surprised if it was a combination of Oil barons and the great Current war during that time. They also had steam powered cars, which I always thought was cool.
@@ryanshannon7703 ICE engines took over due to the energy density of gasoline vs batteries. Its was a no brainer, 1/3 gallon of gasoline weighs about 2.5 lbs and stores as much energy as a 1000 lb battery (the lead-acid variety of the time)
I actually was involved in the development of one of these ion exchange fuel cells. We had a trailer that was a mini-home to exhibit the technology and demonstrate it in use. It ran on hydrazine and was paired with a set of solar panels on the roof of the trailer. We generated a lot of excitement and attracted a number of interested parties. But when the fuel cells failed after nine months in use the company could not solve the technical issues involved. And yes it was
Happens. Company buys patent rights, builds a product and has no idea how it really works. My laservue is sitting in my basement still.... $6000 for a rptv that had a laser light engine that was supposed to last over 20k hours... think it had 2k when it goofed.... still the only display device I know of that could reproduce over 100% of the colors visible to humans.... ripppppp to mitsubishi tvs
I studied Stanley Myers back in high school. One of the most influential stories I have ever studied. He designed small hydrogen generators that replaced the spark plugs. His design converted ANY combustion engine into "water powered".
@@jb-xc4oh You sir... should do your research before you open your mouth. A hydrogen generator, or "HHO generator" is what fueled his water powered car. Water, electricity applied with a resonant frequency and electrolytes are all you need to separate the H20 molecule. Apply this within an insulated capsule with the proper spacing of electrodes and you have yourself a "reactor", as Mr. Myers called it. Thermal dynamics do not keep hydrogen from powering a combustion engine 😉
@@Moore_Power Oh really. Show me a car that runs on water and I'll show you a con artist....its bullshit and I'll tell you why. Thermal dynamics do come into play, hydrogen does have a thermal energy content just like all fuels do. Its problem is its energy density, a pound of hydrogen occupies a very large volume compared to liquid fuels and here is where your hydrogen generator falls flat on its face. To produce the volume of hydrogen needed to continuously run even a 3.5 liter engine would require a "reactor" the size of two small cars. That's one problem, the other problem is where does the electricity come from to power the reactor. Your reactor is just a fancy term for the electrolysis of water. Have you any idea how much electrical power is needed to break down water. In order to produce the thermal equivalent of a gallon of gasoline you need to expend roughly 47Kw of electrical power to produce the equivalent thermal energy of hydrogen by the electrolysis of water. Where in the hell is the 47Kw of electrical energy going to come from. Not from the puny alternator in a car it only produces 1.2Kw, if that. The average single family home is limited to about 12Kw draw from the grid. Have you any idea how large a 47Kw electrical generator is and how much horsepower its engine requires to continuously provide 47Kw of power.....about 124 horsepower. Even if you did build something like this, how would you start the engine in the morning when the reactor isn't producing any hydrogen. How would you be able to vary your speed while on the highway......it gets very very complicated doesn't it. This is why I call running a car on water bullshit. Do you think engineers are stupid and have not thought about any of this like its some big dark secret. This is why hydrogen fuel cells are used and Toyota did build a hydrogen race car to test out some of their ideas......you can find this on RUclips. However for obvious reasons they used compressed hydrogen stored in a large tank at 10,000 psi. The car had a 1.6L turbocharged engine and here is the root problem of gaseous hydrogen.......they could drive only 28 miles before they had to change fuel tanks. They had to change fuel tank 35 times during a 1000 mile endurance race. So yeah, I call running a car on water bullshit....!!
@@jb-xc4oh you seem like a pretty reasonable person... Please do more research. HHO generators are above 17% production efficiency on a GM alternator. And where are you getting the math that a reactor the size of 2 small cars is needed? Hydrogen can be explosive with oxygen concentrations between 18 and 60 percent, while regular gasoline is between 1 and 3 percent.
@@jb-xc4oh and that old Volkswagen dune buggy with a GM alternator that Stanley Myers created was, and is 100% real. He traveled to Science conventions with it as well. There are many many videos, and patent breakdowns of the car J B. Hell, the first hydrogen powered car was first designed in 1807 by a swiss inventor. There definitely wasn't a high pressure tank on that 4 wheeled wagon, lol. Actually it was just a balloon... Check out Rodger Billings when you get a chance, too. Very interesting as well. 👍🏼 Oh yeah, and there's G.H. Garrett. Dallas, Texas man who created an electrolytic carburetor. And, who the F**k said it's a big dark secret? It's all about efficiency. You're cracking off info, and it's quite interesting how much you DON'T want a HHO generator to be efficient enough to power a small combustion engine. And the US department of defense bought Mr. Myers patents... Why would they do that if they were not worth anything? In today's day and age having a very dangerous and inefficient HHO generator doesn't make sense. That doesn't mean it's not possible. Good luck with yourself...
Look up a company called Terralogix in Quebec, Canada. They invented a type of carburetor that allowed a 4 cylinder Toyota Tercel engine to burn 98% of the fuel delivered. It ran for a half hour in a closed garage while a television news crew filmed the demonstration. An exhaust analyzer was used to measure any pollution but the readings were almost nil. Nobody needed to wear breathing equipment. When the demo was over the Terralogix manager and the inventor of the device announced they were taking the car to the Auto Show in Japan. There never was a follow up but Terralogix later said they had "shelved" the device.
My dad told me stories about having a self-winding watch, and most adults don't even remember the ones we wound manually. It's like we're living backwards.
@@kevinharrison5620 awesome. Glad to know they exist (again/still). Now who will buy me one for Christmas, and how will I be able to know it's keeping good time?
@@nunontherunnumberone Decent automatic watches (self winding) are about +/- 10 seconds a day. Need good time? Cheap casio battery watch is about +/- 5 seconds a month and change the battery every 2 years. Self winding automatic watches have to be worn so they wind themselves. Of course your phone will keep the best time due to being tied to the internet with the atomic clock so it resets itself every now and then. Auto watches are for status and situations where you don't have access to change a watch battery and stuff like that. Watch Joe Rogan's little clip where he talks about watches. He also gave his buddy Lex Friedman a $12,000 Omega watch.
ArkusTheGreat I earned my degree in automotive technology a few years ago, and was really surprised to read about those in our electricity and electronics textbook. I had no idea they had a viable hybrid that long ago. I think they had an assist motor powered by an oversized alternator.
EV1 sucked. It ran on lead acid batteries and had a range of about 50 miles. I remember a clip from the film with Ed Begley Jr saying, “That’s all you need to get to work and back.” Cars are more than commuter boxes. Work from home. You save way more energy than commuting 50 miles.
Specifcialy Large Format NiMH. That had other uses outside of cars. We're only seeing it now with Lithium Ion. FYI NiMH energy density is about 60-70% of Lithium Ion.
Maybe in movies and TV where dying people are of sound mind and conveniently get a last minute moment of clarity. In the moments before people die their faculties are failing including their brain. Who can know what's really going on in the mind of someone about to pass away?
@@Ironwind1972 You're taking on a lot of faith that words coming from a dying brain would be coherent and well considered. They could just be a result of whatever happens to be running through at that moment.
@@sswpp8908 Why are you trolling the comment?? It was said with sentimental value. If your father was dying and told you that he loved you and regretted all the mistakes he made with you, are you going to just blow that off as a dying person not in the right state of mind? Damn man.
@@Ironwind1972 The only reference to last words in this video were from a man who believed he was poisoned in his last moments. What does this have to do with my Dad?
Stanley Meyer died in 1998 after he ran out of a restaurant yelling "they killed me". At the time he was meeting with 2 Belgian investors who were trying to buy the rights to his invention.
so i got really into this. i was learning about cars at the time, i built a few hydrogen generators and hooked em up to various cars. i studied his papers and notes, it actually got me learning basic physics etc. what i found out is its bullshit lol... sorry. i really wanted it to be true, but the more i learned the more meyer looked like a snake oil salesman.
@@cypherbane139 😂😂u are a liar sir. There were no notes or papers of his to study from. His workshop was ransacked and his papers were confuscated by the fbi. Liar.
@garlickman But it isn't. Burning Hyrogen gives you energy because the process of combining hydrogen and oxygen releases energy. You have to put at least the same amount of energey into the water if you want to pull hydrogen out of it. If there was some chemical or whatever which you could use to split water into hydrogen and oxygen so you can use the hydrogen as a fuel, generating said chemical would be very energy intensive. It would seem that you run you car on water but in reality you would run you car on said chemical. The only way to pull "free" energy out of regular water is by fusion. There is plenty of free energy in there. I is not mystical or special. Every boring star in the universe does just that. But since the environment inside a star is rather extreme we cannot just copy that simple process but struggle since 50 years to build anything besides a bomb.
I also looked into many forms of what people call free energy, I understand the rules, but a single atom has an enormous amount of energy if you can harness it it, but anyways... Meyers had some patents out I n this technology with many details on how it worked, I don't know how or if they can be accessed anymore, but he wasn't using electrolysis, the system was constantly measuring the resonance of the water, conditioning it with high voltage pulsed frequency and then it would enter the engine through a special injector that was also high voltage pulsed almost like he was making plasma, it also would recycle some of the exhaust back into the cylinders because the hydrogen would burn to fast so it need a non oxygen gas to help fill the combustion chamber, he made all the electronics out of old tech because the newer style semiconductors couldn't pulse the power right. What I could find was very interesting and it looked like he was trying to make a retro fit kit the had the electronics and injectors around the time he died, also this was all based off an old dune buggy with a VW engine which also caught my attention had 2 when I was in high school, I'm pretty sure some of this stuff is real but we aren't allowed to have it, I could go on and on about it, see it you can find info on a couple US soldiers who brought a generator back from Germany, it used a common bosch generator slightly modified with a pretty large capacitor, the 2 reverse engineered it and where making and selling them, you pull start it and it would make 300 watts until the bearings or the brushes went out, many witnesses to this
My uncle was the CEO of Rolls-Royce jet engines in Columbus Ohio and he told us about the engine that ran on water.. always wondered what happened to it
shelbyz1988 referring to bloom boxes in my comment.... I get the sense you’re talking about HHO. HHO can increase the completeness of fuel burn per engine cycle. There is no on vehicle method to convert water to hydrogen gas at the volumetric efficiency required to operate a motor vehicle simply because you would have to start with twice the energy or have onboard access to energy source that on it’s own would be fully capable of operating the motor vehicle without the use of a combustion process. Edit also just remembered that I believe Toyota and kenworth are marketing a PEM based hydrogen cell for semi trucks. They have to refill at special stations and cost a lot but the concept is starting to become economically viable enough to consider for freight vehicles on port duty. Not quite open road ready because filling stations are sparse. These things will cruise at 65 tho and spit out oxygen and water.
DescriptionThe Bloom Energy Server or Bloom Box is a solid oxide fuel cell power generator made by Bloom Energy, of Sunnyvale, California, that takes a variety of input fuels, including liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons produced from biological sources, to produce electricity at or near the site where it will be used.
I remember seeing a article in mother earth magazine decades ago, that was about adding water injection to an engine. Did something like increase compression, cant remember the exact details. Took a car that got 20 mpg and bumped it up to over 100 mpg. It was based off water injection technology they used back in ww2 on bomber aircraft to give them a boost of power, when fully loaded on takeoff.
People can't drive on roads and be safe. Ya really wanna be flying around where you plummet to the ground when some a$$hole runs a red light cause their in a hurry. Not only do ya get tboned ya then fall from the sky
Bloom Energy, that makes Bloom Boxes, is still in business. We use their fuel cells that convert natural gas to electricity, without combustion. All depends on the price of electricity, if they are worth the investment and achieve a positive ROI. No mystery to them, simply a chemical reaction.
I put an unbounded vacuum inside a temporal field until a world developed. I then introduced the people of this world to the wonders of electricity in the form of a device I call a flooble crank. No more Bloom Boxes!
I HAVE THE DOCUMENTS We meet again... and I’m going to need those documents now?!.. *ninja pose* I swear to the gods that I don’t know/follow you at all. We must have the same interests, because I see you once a fucking day, it seems hahahaha.
figured that out long ago my friend. Always good to see other mindlike people. I still remember when Bush made his announcement after 9/11 when i was a kid and he said: Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th. Me to my dad: Daddy, what is he talking about? what conspiracy theories? It just happenned yesterday, how could these theories be made SO fast & spread so fast? Why isnt he actually mentioning one of these theories? My Dad: ................ (with a look on his face like) *FK me this kid knows to hit it where it hurts*
Flat earth really tainted the term and all credible conspiracy theories for good, wouldn't be surprised if higher powers powered the flat earth movement
Back in the early to mid 90's, I heard the same story about the same guy - from 2 different guys who didn't now each other. I heard these stories about 5 years apart. The story goes like this - there was this guy who lived in a trailer not too far from where I live (western NC), and this guy had created a car that ran on an air compressor. He supposedly first did this with a lawn mower, then with a ford pinto. Supposedly a big oil or gas or auto company offered him something like a couple of million dollars to buy it, and he knew it had a lot more commercial potential than that, so he turned it down. Then right after he turned it down, his trailer and shop / garage beside the trailer were gone, the yard was plowed then planted with grass, and there was no trace of the guy. Supposedly they "disappeared" him. The first time I heard this story, it sounded like BS, but to hear it again about 5 years later, exactly the same story, exactly the same location, from another guy who didn't know the first guy, makes me think there's something to it.
The story I heard. This guy in Tremonton UT invented a gas improving carburetor. Standard Oil came and offered him money for the invention. He told them, no, he wanted to grow it. He came home that night, the same guy was talking to his wife at the front door, As he passed the Standard Oil guy said, "I can give you the money or your widowed wife." He took the money.
@@omarbernal3804 he was poisoned yes. Also, he made it so efficient that you could change ANY vehicles spark plugs and they electricuted to water right before the cylinder and it send hydrogen into cell. Got about 50% mpg increase
We had it. Nikola Tesla had technology that used the free space around us. It was very efficient. Nikola Tesla was killed by the govt and they took his work because free energy is what. FREE
@@masonventrone3653 dude i basically lost a friend because he got stuck up with the idea of plasma spools and free energy. He went and signed up with the Keshe university, spend quite some money on it. Now 5 years later he got no where. Don't believe stuff somebody said online. Do your own logic. The best reason in this word not to shelf technology is the capitalistic system itself. Nobody could withhold essential technology because it would make more profit to sell it.
you really need to talk about that cop that was unfortunately killed in the buffalo shooting, he posted a video 6 years ago of a hydrogen gas powered car i hope u really get to read this comment.
I'm near 60 and the best thing about age is the lack of sexual desire or demand really when your young. Sex is a very demanding indulgence that makes drastic changes in peoples lives. Getting control of sexual desire really strengthened me in so many other areas. I recommend it highly.
When I was a kid they had these " power pellets" they were developing. We had a school tour of the factory. These pellets were supposed to power everything. We got a depleted sample to bring home. I have never seen or heard of them since. Can't find the pellet anywhere. But my parents remembered everything cause I came home all excited about the school trip. And showed them how the pellet was going to be installed.
They didn’t continue with them because even though Nuclear is less efficient and less safe, Thorium didn’t produce a military grade by-product. So Thorium was less profitable.
“Self sustaining energy creation”. Leaving aside this breaches laws of thermodynamics, he just described a perpetual motion machine. These were fuel cells. Like hydrogen fuel cell powered cars
Look it up, they are still around, the use natural gas instead of hydrogen and for some reason they aren't very economical cause everyone stopped using them. But as far as I can tell they are a fuel cell with a chemical oxidizer in them "one that presumably has to be replaced in time"
@@elijahhmarshall www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/the-bloom-is-off-bloom-energy/ no idea. Not an expert. seems to be 2x the price per output of a cogeneration unit.
I can't imagine that we'd be in a better place if we were in the habit of choosing inferior technology. Don't believe all this "conspiracy theory" stuff. If you do unbiased research you'll find "inventions" like these were either complete frauds or they consisted of one or two genuine good ideas but were still a number of ideas short of having something new and feasible. Good people are currently and legitimately working to solve the problems to get this kind of stuff working. Bloom was/is close, but they are still WAY short of the goals they promised they could hit. Fraudsters are seeking investors because they claim they already have these things working, and kooky conspiracy theorists claim that some eccentric loner somehow already got it working two days before his mysterious death. I call BS on 99% of it.
@@mobilegameplaywalkthroughs990 Your argument is somewhat contradictory. You are right the ideas were a little short of a full taco but thats because they werent heavily invested in the way they are now. As you said there are some " great people" working on it. There were great people back then too however they didnt get a chance to push forward technology do to lobbying, back door deals, big business etc. It isnt a conspiracy theory to say that self interest and profit motive can at times stand in the way of inovation that threatens their very being. Thats just plain sense
....it's not a hidden fact. And the engines they had back then we're too heavy and inefficient, same goes for batteries. The only reason it's viable now, is due to modern production and chemical knowledge. It would barely change anything at all
@@GoalOrientedLifting Again you are refusing to address the issue. Im not saying the technology was fully viable or perfect. The discussion around "who killed the electric car" and other works is about a lack of investment so that the technology could become viable.
@@methos1999 Bloom sells the power from the units for 5-15% less than buying power from the grid, rather than selling the units themselves. The fuel cells have an operational life expectancy of around 10 years; based on predictions on fuel costs, the "break even" point for those who purchase the device is around 8 years. Bloom Energy traces its roots to work performed by K.R. Sridhar in connection with creating a technology to convert Martian atmospheric gases to oxygen for propulsion and life support. 2 is 20% of 10.
The water car dude met with government officials at a restaurant and then came running out of the restaurant yelling “they poisoned me”. Then died in the street.
I believe it because that's their money has it been on the gold standard since the 60s or 70s it is basically backed by oil that's why they call it the petrodollar without oil being a hot commodity our money would be worthless in many many countries would collapse
His name was Stephen Meyers I believe. If I remember correctly his electrolysis system used the Tesla pulsed longitudinal electric impulse wave to generate the electrolysis reaction far more efficiently than can be done using normal transverse AC or DC electromagnetic waves. He supposedly broke the device up into 3 patents to sneak it thru the patent office censors for this kind of stuff where they usually catch it and file it away... ever heard about those 5580 secret patents the American Federation of Scientists is always tracking to see how many the government are hiding and burying now behind the guise of "National Security"? If they were really *that* important to National Security they would be in a vault 10 miles under a mountain to never be heard of on any list under 24/7/365 armed guard by an agency that doesnt officially exist, not on a list anyone can get FOIA access too. Cmon what kind of amatuers do you think you're dealing with when the fate of who controls the world is at stake... Anyone who is interested in this kind of stuff should start with Eric Dollard's lectures on Tesla and electrical engineering of 120 years ago and then look into Thomas Townsend Brown's work. Edit: fixed spelling and grammatical errors from autocorrect. P.S. Read Ether Technology - A Rational Approach to Gravity Control by Rho Sigma Even Einstein didnt believe in the constancy of the speed of light!!! Tesla believed in the Aether and he basically developed the modern world's energy grid, I would be inclined to believe him or else his inventions would never have worked. People still havent been able to replicate magnitude of the level of his work 120 years later... at least outside of classified defense department contracts that the public would NEVER hear about...
He's way too comfortable with being unintelligent. Thousands of podcasts and he's surprised by the same things every time. Nikola Tesla is greater than Joe Rogan will ever be. Joe Rogan could literally bathe in DMT and never think of alternating current.
While innovation quashing is definitely something that happens when big companies get too big, the water powered car was an absolute hoax. There's simply no way thermodynamics would allow that kind of energy to come from water. What was suggested was a perpetual motion device and the guy never offered any explanations or schematics for how it worked. To this day it hasn't been explained because the real explanation is probably a small DC motor on the rear axle tied to a shitload of batteries with a water tank sitting on top.
And people have no understanding that while water does have hydrogen and oxygen in it (duh, H2O), which can be turned into a burnable combination of gaseous hydrogen and gaseous oxygen, the electrolysis and the subsequent burning have conversion losses, which is wasted energy. You end up with less energy out of burning the gases than you put in with the electricity for electrolysis. This is also one of the reasons that "HHO" electrolysis added to internal combustion engines is bull$hit.
@@04938dreadfelix It's actually called electrolysis and, not only does it not PRODUCE energy, it takes a dickload of energy to do. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis_of_water
Energy has to come from somewhere. Water is a low energy state compared to H2 and O2. It doesn't have potential to do work unless those molecules are separated through electrolysis. Something else has to put the energy in first. Same with running on charged particles from the air. The potential for charged particles to do work comes from a separation of + charge and - charge. For any car to use whatever supposed charge is in the air it would first need to have a strong charge opposite polarity of what's in the air. That charging process done to the vehicle can only be created by energy somewhere else.
Yes, "the charging process done to the vehicle can only be created by energy somewhere else." Nevertheless, in any given room there may be a significant ratio of charged to non-charged particles. If there is a sufficient gradient with a reasonable efficiency rate then work can be done until the difference in potential energy becomes nil. The significant question for me becomes: is the potential energy sufficiently high to effectively run the engine, assuming that the engine has sufficient efficiency? Also, is the net positive or negative charge in the air reliably created and how is it generated anyway?
@Angelo Stevens Essentially we are making an analogy with the common process associated with compliance with the second law of thermodynamics. This is heat exchange. It takes a steady flow of energy or volumetric mixing [ and/or compression] for an area to be significantly heated. If an object "wants" to exploit the "potential" energy in the heated space then it must not be equal to the temperature of the heated space. If the object is colder then it can absorb some of the energy of the system. If it is hotter then it can give up some of it's energy till it is equal. This is the gradient. But the analogy is not perfect. Heat exchange involves energy flow from one type of source positive whereas charged particle exchange involves energy exchange from two types negative and positive. Also I have not mentioned entropy or the exchange of information. Imagine if there are two batteries on the vehicle; one able to selectively absorbed positively charged particles and one the negatively charged particles. Then the potential energy flow between the object and the room depends on the sum of charged particles in the room rather than the difference between one type [gradient] of particle. The information required to differentiate the particles requires energy that is always greater than the potential energy the object can receive. But there can be regions where the entropy is lower than the average entropy of the "world". This might include aspects that facilitate information acquisition, within the limits of particle-energy physical limits [ i.e. qcd rules, schrodinger/bohr quantum rules, relativistic rules] .
@Angelo Stevens My first response is an attempt to tie in the entropy rule and simplistic information theorey to explain why exploiting the potential energy of charged particles encounters limits in efficiency and effectiveness generally.
Elon is a false profit! He is a true con man! His tech is old, his quality is shotty at best, and his company makes no money, all funded by Grant's and donations!
@@dred5375 , I agree on the false profit idea. but i dont think elon knows it. He thinks he is in control, when in reality he is being allowed to succeed. The tesla vehicles are more pollutant to the earth than any combustion engine and if/when we are all forced to use them, they can be controlled centrally, just like minority report, or like the voting machines.
I remember bloom boxes. They were very promising for homeowners as well. They were able to power a home all year long for very little cost. All you had to do was buy the chemicals that created the chemical reaction, but like everything that is promising to the public it gets bought off and shut down by big business.
Bloom box came out in popularity around the same time solar energy became extremely popular. Bloom box was going to win solar energy by a lot because people didn’t not like the aesthetics on the roof but the bloom box would produce the same energy using water and would not be an eye sore.
Stanley Meyer figured out a way to run an internal combustion engine on pure distilled water and was murdered because of the threat his invention posed to a Big Oil corporation ..These companies are ruthless and won't let any progress come between their profit margins!
Stanley Meyer was a grifter who lied to his investors and was subsequently convicted of fraud. His "water engine" ran on gasoline. You deserve a better class of hero.
It doesn't break the laws of thermodynamics and it's not free energy...But guess what, it does work... the problem is it's nearly impossible to get it to work and if you don't understand what's going on you will get exposed to radiation.
@@BradKwfc Okay so it works. fantastic I believe you.Now can you please show or explain to me how, and I mean exactly how these machines work. Because unless I am missing something The Second Law of Thermodynamics says that entropy in the universe must always increase. It's an immutable law of physics, and it's the reason you can't get free energy or perpetual motion machines. I am not taking the piss mate I am genuinely interested in anyone who could solve our looming energy crisis.
@@normanswindon518 You expect me to explain it all and give away 13 years of research in the youtube comment section? I'll give you the short version, the long version may be released someday in the future when (or if I ever) finish my book. First off, I don't believe in free energy and try to stay as far away from that crowd as possible so please don't associate me with that kind of thinking. If you understand electrolysis its easy to see why so many scientists claimed Stan was a fraud. Stan stated that he used low current and high voltage to split the water molecule and produce massive amounts of gas with very little energy. The problem with that claim is: 1. Faraday's laws of electrolysis state that the volume of gas produced is directly proportional to the amount of electrons that flow into the reaction. 2. High voltage produces side reactions that release heat and reduce efficiency 3. There is NO such thing as free energy I'm not sure how deep I'm willing to get into this so I'll keep it brief. Stan figured out a way to create a secondary source of electrons in which he used the high voltage to control the amount of electrons that flowed into the reaction. But that's only half of the story, you also have to have Ions present. Water naturally produces IONS, its called the 'Self Ionization of Water'. What occurs is that in water the molecules are polar (exhibit and + and - electric field) and they are always in motion. In specific instances water molecules and nearby molecules will orient in such a way where their electric fields add together (like batteries in series). When this happens molecules are split and they produce a Hydronium (H3O+) and Hydroxide (OH-) ion. Naturally the life of the IONs is very short, but the IONs can last longer if an external electric field is present. The 'self ionization of water' proves that an electric field with no current flow can actually split water molecules...But again you also have to have current flow and the self ionization of water does not produce enough IONs to explain what Stan was doing. Within Stan's cells several different phenomena were occurring all at once. If you did not know what you were doing and somehow got it to work you would get exposed to radiation. So again there's a lot more going on than meets the eye. The problem is getting it to work. I've spent 13 years, taught myself transformer and circuit design and have designed and tested numerous circuits etc and have still not had success. In reality getting it to work is almost impossible. First off, the water being split is used as an element in the circuit, the properties of water change with temperature, frequency, applied voltage etc. The circuit operates on two pulse frequencies that are overlaid onto each other, each frequency has to be sopt on, also, each frequency has to have a specific duty cycle and applied voltage which changes as the applied voltage changes. On top of that if your water cell is not properly shielded it will capacitively couple to nearby objects which will prevent the system from working. Also, initial conditions must be met before the process will occur, and once you get the process occurring an adjustment too far will cause voltage spikes and throw the system out of operation. Again-NOT free energy but extremely complex, nearly impossible to get to work, and can be dangerous if you don't take the proper precautions.
Grove City Ohio, location of inventor who built the car that ran on water (actually hydrogen which was produced on board by electrolysis). He had many patents on parts of this tech, which have since expired. The device which divides the hydrogen from Oxygen in H2O can be easily built and installed in a car to add hydrogen to a gas engine, thereby greatly decreasing the amount of gas needed to run the car. The biggest hurdle seems to be the onboarding computers on modern cars which, eventually, defeat the incoming hydrogen and cause the gas intake to increase. Supposedly, though, this modification works well on an older car or truck.
Aaron Salter Jr - security guard shot 5 times in Buffalo mass shooting - had just filed a patent for a water based engine for cars the week before he was killed. The last person who tried it (Stan Meyer) died believing that someone poisoned him.
There are probably easier more subtly ways to 'off' someone these days, but it does seem an incredible coincidence, especially as the man drove 200 miles from New York to kill black people. He could have done that in New York.
"We are all fucked. We live in a simulation and we don't even know it. When we do find out indefinitely we will ignore it out of fear. We're so fucked." George Washington 1929
As an engineering student in my last year, nothing i have studied leads me to believe in any of these inventions, in most cases they are not fake, just not competitive, the drawbacks being cleverly omitted from the demostrations. It's basically like the perpetual motion machines, they all seem to work untill you build them yourself.
@@reecesullivan9985 yep. What he is learning is the fundamentals, or a version of them. To think that's the be all end all is a bit silly. These people didn't garner the attention they did for something that didn't work.
@john doe copper telecommunication lines would heat up, melt, or even flash to vapor before we developed better insulation methods to prevent the free harvest of the earths electromagnetic field. Tesla, as in the modern company with musk, should build this. All they need is a huge granite, or some other stone, slab, atleast a kilometre long, almost as thick. These can be found all over the earth just under the surface. They could set up a tower that is in a particularly strong magnetic loop/arc, which they would measure with ground and drone based measuring equipment to determine the best placement for the tower. The ultimate show would be if tgey powered the new electric plane with this tower. I have no idea of the ranges these things are capable of, but in oldschool teslas time it was a few kilometres, I'm sure modern stuff would be more efficient. If it's 15km that would allow a plane to charge while in flight before leaving the range of the tower. Vehicles would only need to be in their vicinity for x period of time to charge.
Wtf do you think I learn about then you morons, ex the hydrogen car is a real thing, the costs of hydrolysis and the extra complexity of any system that deals with gases are its drawbacks, it is well known technology, scientists worldwide are already working on this technology, it just seems like it's less efficient than an EV. The thing abt earth's magnetic field is that it doesn't have energy, it will orient a compass, but it wont make it spin, it's just like gravity, you can't take energy out of it. If you don't trust engineers and scientists, we are not brainwashed, scientific education is based on demostrations and experimentations
A Bloom Box was simply a fuel cell. It ran on propane. It worked (a lot of the time) but was less than reliable. Still could be a viable option though.
![Hunxho - Ball Forever [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nki9ZTF9Uls/mqdefault.jpg)
I remember watching the news with my mom as a kid I couldn't of been more than 10 years old. The story was about the man who fueled his car with water. I vividly remember my mother saying that this is going to change the world. Then nothing. I brought it up it up with my friends getting stoned a few years back during our college years and everyone thought I was crazy and they said the story never existed. Like I just made it up. I felt like it was some crazy Mandela effect until I ran across this clip. Thank you, Joe. I really thought I was losing it... lol
Edit: To all of the people who have said I could of just "googled" it. You are absolutely correct. I was referring to a time when dial up internet was still a thing and people's first instinct were not to just run to the internet to validate information. Life happened and after seeing this clip reminded me years later of this news story.
jbtre haha
Hyde is that you
Hey it wasnt just you, my mom told me the same story but the oil industry killed it.
ruclips.net/video/bzhJpZ72BSQ/видео.html
Was it this story??
Yeah it's a hoax. There never was any such thing. It's not even possible. The news people are pretty stupid. It's not hard to fool them.
They'll produce cars that run on air when they find a way to charge you for air
We are already charged for air .....it's called income taxes. Taxation without representation.
Correct
Maybe we would all ran out of Oxigen and die?
Ever seen the Lorax 😂
Cough cough carbon tax
Would be interesting to see a list of every patent that was bought and shelved on purpose
This right here.
All patents are public knowledge I believe
@Poseidon en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_Secrecy_Act
Been years but i remember a talk with a phd...he claimed that there wr +/- 900 inventions(to improve mileage) bought&shelved.Lots of them wr bought by General Motors
@@Astrodicted I remember watching a documentary YEARS ago about two guys working on improving gas mileage. Their test vehicle was a Triumph TR-6. They used common parts from wrecking yards. If memory serves, they were able to achieve 150 mpg. I've never seen the doc again.
My family knew the water dune buggy guy. My wife’s grandfather helped him do presentations. She herself took a ride in it. That actually was a real thing.
So the world like needs a ton of info on this. So if you could like mass drop any of his research papers online that would be great.
If we Americans can get that we would improve the world.,.....
@@LuisMartinez-hj2cu no. They wouldn’t. I wish everyone was in the right paths on this stuff if they are interested…
The car still exists today.. he was killed for being way past his time. And yes he could’ve changed the world and he would be the richest most known if everything was going his way.. after he died. Everyone stole his invention. Even the military… why it’s not being used or being sold as a full car at dealers? Nobody will know or even car to find any of this out. Have a good day 😀
Bahahah liar
@@jimgordon3468 Im not lying. I don't know the technology and I wasn't there but my wife literally took a ride in the water fueled dune buggy and her grandfather was partners with him.
Here's one for the record books:
My grandfather once told me about an engineer at GM that created a roller-bearing engine. Basically, this engine would last 30 years, because it would negate the damage slide-type bearings do as an engine deals with friction and heat. This is why cars only last 10 years or 200,000 miles. Most engines are not designed to last longer than that before the main bearings and rod bearings give out, due to the bearing surfaces having no metal left on them. Because he worked for GM, they took his idea and shelved it, as a roller-bearing engine would shut down the profits made from new cars.
Very interesting I wonder if it can be replicated
It's been confirmed we have the tech to make an engine last forever
@@johnnyk617 not forever but a very long time
Thats guys rly common thing in technology of all kind in this era. Look at your phone, all good until one year goes by and all of a sudden you camera making way worse qaulity photos etc etc. Everything what is sold out massively is being designed like this. Crazy world we live in but wat can we do.
@@ogshane6163 : It's called "pre-planned obsolescence."
It's why, in 2008, Ram broke off from Dodge, part of now-Stilantis Corporation (previously Daimler-Chrysler). Literally, Chrysler made the transmission on 2009 Dodge Rams so bad that they would give out after only 12,000 miles. We are talking about an automotive component assembly that is supposed to handle hundreds of horsepower and torque, and last for hundreds of thousands of miles.
Yet this same component in a 2009 Dodge Ram lasted hardly at all. I actually read about a guy who bought a Dodge Ram at that time brand new, and he ended up replacing the transmission 3 times in one year.
At what point does shelving technology like that become a crime against humanity?
Slick We would need a court that could n would prosecute for the planet instead of for profits...
When it’s financially advantageous to do so.
How about protecting these inventors with guns
Maybe when it's actually true
When it becomes something more than a meme
“They’ve got these cars. They run on water, man!”
-Hyde, That 70’s Show
they been hiding it under our nose for years
They were just separating hydrogen from water and combusting it.... Problem is it takes more energy to extract that hydrogen and burn it than it gives back. It was BS
Thermodynamics 101
@@Preacher_. no it doesn't. What does that have to do with thermodynamics??? Dafuq? You can literally seperate hydrogen and oxygen particles (H2O) with a 6volt battery.
@@Lunatic5306 it's called Electrolysis... The problem is, it takes more energy (regardless of wether it's in a battery or not) to separate the hydrogen and oxygen molecules, than you'll get back by combusting that hydrogen.
And yes, you could use Solar Power to power the Electrolysis(which creates alot of heat, and heat = energy loss), to turn water into hydrogen & oxygen. But at that point you're better off skipping the hydrolosis, which bleeds alot of energy as heat & just using Solar power to charge a battery, and draw power from that battery.
Thermodynamics is a bitch.
I came to this video just to make sure this comment was here
Man we need people that can protect people against bullies like this
God
@@MikellSaunders-sj1nr how has it worked so far ??
It's probably true. Look at the light bulb, they had to dummy it down or it would last 100 years... in fact there is still a light bulb thats been on for over a hundred years in a firehouse somewhere.
“The Light Bulb Conspiracy” is the documentary and the light bulb is in a Chicago firehouse. Great documentary from 2010. 💡
It's a light bulb in the Livermoor California firehouse
Think it is in a lighthouse
Livermore CA.. is the location
Facts
Large companies buying innovative products to nerf them is about as far from a conspiracy theory as can be. It happens every day.
jap jesus exactly, buying out the competition has been common practice of glorified merchants
BTW... Anybody know whatever had happen with the water buggy? 🤔
Or the Govt too.
But thinkin companies are supressin and not selling the innovation is what makes it a conspiracy.
Its called suppression
There was an old bloke here in New Zealand, who, in the 70’s invented a car motor that ran on water. It was well documented and in local papers. He could not sell his ideas or get it off the ground. When he died (of natural causes) all his research, schematics etc disappeared from his home. He was old school, everything was in folders, boxes and cabinets in his garage. I came across his story again (along with many others), years later in a book called “suppressed inventions and other discoveries”
Same news went on Hungary like 15-20 years ago… more like 20
Also: there is always a story about a water powered car, or a carb that made 100mpg. Every nation has one, every generation. I have heard it....hundreds of times. Always a different person. Always 'they' bought the patent or tech. Always died mysteriously.
All patents filed are searchable. They describe how it works. After 20 years you are free to replicate it. Even if they buy the rights and shelve it.
Go to Google patents and ace down the patents yourself. There are quite a few, so try and narrow it down.
@@joshcoray3777 9
I heard of a guy in my nz town who was doing that said it had to be "virgin water" that had been in the earth for 100years and was negatively charged and pure. Would use the spring on my friends farm to run his lawn mower. Said it worked off implosion and had to run the engine 180 degrees out if phase so the implosion would suck the piston up. He may have also changed it to a 2 stroke not sure.
@@joshcoray3777 The funny thing is hydrogen cars and trucks are on the road today. If it is scaled up more it may actually become cost effective. I had a conversation about it with someone at work. He brought up the tale of the "water powered" car you are referring to I asked if he was talking about a car with a hydrogen fuel cell or maybe an ICE that burns it. He was like "not hydrogen, water" but could not tell me how the technology worked. I don't really mind or get aggravated talking to people who believe wild conspiracies. I don't want to hear that shit all the time but it can be pretty amusing!
Rumor has it that one of the people murdered in the Buffalo supermarket massacre was the inventor of a car engine that runs on water.
nothing runs on water. water is already burnt hydrogen, no chemical potential energy left. It's alrdy burnt.
Yeah it’s true, shits wild
That is true.
Is there a way I can look up that? Like do u have proof of somekind?
@@jessicamccauley3051ready for that rabbit hole?
When Goku learned the "Instant Transmission" technique I'm pretty sure it was BP and the US government who gave Goku the heart virus.
What?!
They also funded Dr. Gero's research... completely oblivious to their own doom...
I'm dead
@@cmderp they're DBZ references...
It was capsule Corp. Bulma was a insider who sold goku out
He had declined a 2 billion dollar deal the week before. He was a genius. They did kill him!!
Meyers patent it out there. His shit doesn't work.
@@BiggerFatterBlog yes it does,,so much so a few companies are out there doing h20 conversions and you can fill up with ocean water also...do your research
@@BiggerFatterBlog they also said Tesla was impractical so nobody retraced his steps and reinvent what they shelf and use in prototype.
Electricity can travel through soil just a random mention.
If you harvest enough snake oil you can run your diesel truck of it no problem.
@@3rd-eye-neenja563 you can split water with a 9v battery. So seems a solar panel roof, hood and trunk lid, would produce enough hydrogen and oxygen while your car just sits at home or work to drive locally.
I've seen a 100% fuel-less car.
it has holes on its floor for the driver's feet to go through.
Then the driver has to yell YABADABADOO.
@Angelo Stevens LOLOLOL
Holy shit you're hilarious
LOL ! Good comment man 👍🇺🇸.
Not fuel less, you got to eat to fuel your legs.
That's the future when we fuck one another with nukes we're going back to the stone age. Just imagine your descendant in the future travel like that yaba yaba doo!
I have seen 3 or 4 stories just like this over the last 15 years. Inventors creating engines where cars are running off of air, some off water. But in the end, the inventors always go missing, or come up as having a suspicious death.
No; it's actually all simply bullshit. I bet you would believe me if I told you I built an airplane that ran off piss! Ridiculous.
Yh these stories are as believable as the lochness or Bigfoot even.
Retired old men think they did something and die of heart attack. Last guy was a victim in a shooting and people think they did all that to kill one guy…..people are idiots.
Bloom Energy is still alive! They call the “bloombox” an Energy Server now. They are fuel cells that create electricity from natural gas or biogas (without combustion.) They range from 200kW to 300kW output at 480V. They’re great for steady, reliable baseline energy. Look them up!
Thanks for sharing, just looked up some cool stuff related to it!
Our Sam's club has them.
I'm only 30 and I remember the bloombox I thought for sure it was going to take off. It uses natural gas if I remember right. Don't we have so much that we are exporting it?
electromechanical stuff exports have gone up, while imports have gone down 2.9 trillion cubic feet imports vs 3.5 tcf exports. Almost a wash. And just a small fraction of US domestic production/consumption
@@gwaaiedenshaw8310 import/export it's all going down now. Looks like the green new deal/ agenda 21 got exactly what it wanted. Airlines are on brink of financial collapse, reduced population, reduced automotive transportation. It's all their in black and white
Preston Tucker paid the price for building a car that was too good
What happened?
@@q-q-qiah not sure but proberbly got taken out by the men in black suits
Because there's no recurring spend with infinite fuel sources. People like that aren't allowed to exist.
Yea now hydrogen powered cars are having a comeback
If that were true, you wouldn't know about him/it
Car companies be like
“Sorry kid, but the game was rigged from the start”.
Elon Musk: Is it?
Fuck you benny
Yea, sure the "car company killed it" conspiracy or "it's the oil company" conspiracy. No, just simple physics. Thermodynamics is a bitch. But yeah, in that sense, it was rigged because you're not going to beat or defeat thermodynamics no matter how clever you have convinced yourself you are. If you think you've beaten thermodynamics, then you've overlooked something or gotten it wrong.
Mr house disagree
@@robertmiller6444 just because something is clever or innovative doesnt mean it defies thermodynamics.
These things couldve functioned off fairly conventional means.
There’s been quite a number of people who have made cars run on water. Basically you make a small hydrogen generator on the trunk (in simple terms you just put an electrical current in water and split the molecules). Lots safer carting around a tank of water and creating a small amount of hydrogen at a time as opposed to carrying around a tank of highly volatile Hydrogen.
Bob Lazar had a car that did that
Ok and how do you provide enough electric energy to produce the hydrogen? Do you know how much electricity it needs to do electrolysis? That's the reason why Toyota's solution doesn't get adopted. You're better off using this electricity to recharge a battery and then feeding it to an electric motor.
@@MrMesVentes don't bring logic into this lmao
@@MrMesVentes you don't. It's not something that actually is efficient. Lazar did it for fun.
@Remix God I guess bc water is a free, renewable resource and *fossil* fuels are not...
"Theres this car man... and it runs on water man !!"
Hyde!😂
So it's a boat ? Lol
Beat me to it.
@@jonathanquick8388 Nah man... it's a car that runs on water.11111
We never run outta stuff to talk about down here lol
*I build a car that runs on DMT*
I build one that runs on elk meat. Would you be interested in a partnership? We could destroy those hybrid pieces of shit...
Waste of dmt and elk meat
We all run in DMT bruhhh
@Nathan unknown DMTeries
Where would it take you though
Just because you’re paranoid, doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you
It also doesn't mean you're not stupid. That's just as likely.
Just because they’re not out to get you doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be paranoid :)
Just like crazy doesn't mean not intelligent or creative .
If they ARE out to get you, are you really being paranoid??
@@ricklopez7151 I think you had better consider what it is that you are doing that might require someone else's attention. If what you are doing is a REAL THREAT to whomsoever, then yes, indeed, it would be time to exercise a tad of paranoia. If you are merely self-harming, then don't waste your time. Unless 'they' are truly stupid. . . .
Of course _you may not know_ they're coming out to get you. . . .OK, be as paranoid as you like. . . . . :)
I had a boss, farmer who was 72 in 2003. He said during the depression, tractors like the single cylinder lanz bulldog hot bulb diesel could be run ON MILK. Not melted cream but STRAIGHT MILK. Had no power to pull a plow or anything but you could drive around your farm to check your sheep and see they had water, drive to town or whatever.
“And there’s this car that runs on water MAN!” - hyde
It has a fiberglass air cooled engine and it runs on water, MAN!
It's true though
@jared price no its a car.. Only you put water in the tank instead of gas. And it runs on water man!!!
Chyea man
HELLOOOOOO WISCONSIN!
I remember telling a coworker about this technology a couple years ago and he acted like I had made the whole thing up, Yeah I'm the crazy one! Well Robert here you go asshole! SEND
@John Smith fuck you
Why didn’t you just google it?
Holding a grudge about a conversation he has probably long forgotten.
You sound like a tit.
Yeah!!!!! F you Robert!!!!! Lol
I fucking hate them guys!
I used to watch this show on RUclips and the guy was bought out by Spotify and put on the Shelf......
I’m sure they won’t miss anyone who can’t move their fingers a couple times to download another app.
@@drmanhattanshog people are just retards man
LMAOO YES‼️‼️‼️
@@Jack20c there's no comment section and spotify videos are clunky and riddled with commercials.
@@JohnstasBACK yeah and? Running spotify reduces the amount of data your using and also you can turn your screen off so you save more battery life. This is very helpful for me as a truck driver. Losing the comment section sucks but I don’t listen to joe for the comment section. Also you can skip thru all the ads, youtube you can’t and the ads are getting longer and there’s more of them.
My grandfather knew a man from our home town that put an Australian tractor motor inside of his car making it go 99 mph while being fuel efficient. Four companies tried suing him for “safety reasons” let’s be real, no they weren’t. Fortunately, he was given five million to never do it again but he had to move away. This man would’ve been breaking the industry if it wasn’t for oil companies, some evil stuff man.
How did an oil company happen to figure out the guy even existed?
I was told that diesel was SHOCKINGLY cheap back in the day. Insyead of beong over the price of petrol, it was 1/3. And with diesels, you take less liters to go the same distance. There were few trucks that ran on it but they could be bought. This old guy was greek and he used to be trucking stuff from Adelaide to Melbourne. He was still making significant profits at half the price of everyone else. He got a second truck and ran the pants off both of them with 3 other drivers. He would do one run, have the other guy drive it at night or whatever and 2 guys alternating on the second truck. Become fairly wealthy out of it. So it's likely it was simply a diesel car, using a diesel tractor engine. Crap acceleration but brilliant efficiency if you match the gearing to the weight correctly.
@@jasonhaiflich8967probably printed in some newspaper
@@jasonhaiflich8967believe me you do something like that even with no press sound gonna get out 🗣️ and when people with suits are the ones who represent they oil company or someone from the car industries if you don’t sell out you probably ended 🆙 dead ☠️ 😅😅😅😅😅
sure nutjob sure hahahahahha
South Park did an episode about this, when Mr. Garrison invented a “vehicle” that could replace air travel, which got him shut down by the government
back in the early 2000 I also hear these news about engines that run on Air or Water... but that was it, it never flourish.
but heres the thing, these engine will BANKRUPT the super rich oil industry. who are the 3 biggest oil companies? Shell, Exxon Mobile, and chevron right? what would you do if you own an oil company? these invention will destroy your business, a car that does not run on gas but runs on FREE water and air? that will not only be used on cars but boats, ships, probably even planes... you will definitely go Bankrupt!
your only choice is to BUY it for millions of dollars (thats cheap compare to how much billions of dollars they make a year) and then hide it, and keep your business running. So YES! corporate oil industries will try their hardest to acquire those inventions because that is a threat to their income.
Tommy Aldridge the It?
Xrynm Chyle dude chill
@@gooz0mbie relax dont panic..
Wasn’t that a parody on the Segway?
They forgot to mention after the guy who created the car that ran on water died, there was a break in at his house and SHOCKER all of his research dissapeared.
My dad knew Mayer. He was a fraud; he raised a load of money from people, including people not to mess with.
@@NapoleonGelignite this. There was probably no research and he scamed the wrong guys.
@The Phoenix -sucker.
@@NapoleonGelignite he was legit. Bob Lazar used his patents to build an engine himself.
Not that hard to separate hydrogen
I grew up in denton, tx..a big college town with large liberal arts and science schools..there was a UNT professor I grew up a few houses down from and he had a mid/late 80's Toyota pickup he was constantly working on and improving to get as good of gas millage as possible and still be a completly road worthy vehicle..made a fiberglass bed covering and front ends that looked like an upturned kyak on the truck..changed suspension, stance, balance everything..he had and worked on this truck for 20+ years and last time I'd heard which was around 2005-06 he was averaging 110 mpg and maintaing an acessable top speed of 84 mph...he did all this on virtually no budget intentionally and was in no way a commercial venture...made all his notes available to anyone all to show it can be done affordable and rather simply and surprisingly dependably...I last saw him maybe 5 or 6 years ago and it was still his daily driver..had to have a huge ammount of miles too...amazing what can be done when your free to experiment without restricts and restraints put on you by the commercial or beautocratic sectors
Was that a Hilux? Can you find that guy now?
Ayy d f dub!! Represent
Where would I be able to find these notes eh
Show us the notes!
@@losvega5004 He was murdered and the notes were deleted off the internet also deleted off the wayback machine archives BIG PHARMA!
If these are the people that showed their inventions publicly. Imagine what has happened to people who haven’t.
Love when Joe says "if you were a conspiracy theorist what would you think happened"
And he replies "Oh I'm a small business realist and someone shelved it"🙏
CIA started the term conspiracy theorist exactly for that reason.
"Conspiracy Theory" has existed for long than the CIA.
@@Thedamped That's because you believe the CIA to have been created in 1947. Agent Skully shiowed me indisputable proof that the CIA was crfeated at least 230 years earlier. So put that in your pipe and smoke it!
@@drchico40 Touche
BaltimoreBluezz no it was transformed into the cia after ww2 for intelligence on communist countries
Agent Muller believes
Love this shit man. My Dad and I would have these same conversations. Pre-internet he was telling me about some of this stuff. He even mentioned floating and steamed power cars from his day which I was able to find footage of online years later. Miss my Dad, thanks for these podcasts man. Peace
Miss my dad also bud
Google/RUclips Ted Pritchard steam car, Australian, was taken very seriously, Ford even flew him and the car to America for testing, all on film.
Even if they developed a car running on air, they tax the air.
Yep Hahahahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Well said
Haven't you heard of the travel tax ?
It's a mileage tax. They're already talking about it for electric cars
@@getchasome6230 An yet they've already had this as well, in the form of tollway taxes. Which is basically a tax for using the road ways.
They'll always come up with some new bull shit to tax though.
When Joe makes an Owen Wilson "Wow!"
I remember that black box. Must of worked because it's gone. Not even a demo model exist. It's in a warehouse next to the Arc of the Covenant !
All that shit is locked up in the Vatican
@@getchasome6230 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Mystery solved. There was a chemical reaction. Bloom box = Natural gas fuel cell
I remember seeing Stan Meyers on NBC back in the mid 70s and was really excited about it, and then heard nothing more until the internet came along and reminded me of him and I was able to catch up on that rabbit hole. If it was good enough to be on NBC news, then surely it must be true. ;)
My step father and his friend invented a machine that would pick up heavy crude oil on water after an oil spill. Shell bought the patent off them with promises of more money when it went into production. It was shelved. It was cheaper...more profitable to lose all the oil and claim the insurance.
That’s sick.
That’s a great idea. Was it a big machine?
This is the problem with this world
@@1realtruthrightnow742 not the world, the ego. the world (earth) will thrive just fine w/o our ego running the show
@@1realtruthrightnow742 I agree! This has always been the problem with the world. There are so many world-changing inventions that have been bought and shelved by large corporations but never saw the light of day. Products that could have changed the world for the better Including cures and drugs for cancer. And other illnesses but the illness is more profitable than the Cure. Very sad.
Interesting! I worked on these a few years ago, same boxes pictured. They're misrepresenting them a bit here, they're Natural Gas Fuel Cells and use a chemical transfer process through a number of ceramic plates instead of a combustion process. Really smart dudes working on it, they do definitely work but it's not "free energy", you have to feed them a NG pipeline. Clean energy, but very expensive.
About 16 years ago I worked at the Baltimore - Washington Airport. A co - worker , an older middle aged man, told me that his friend made a car that ran on potatoes. He drove it around Baltimore, Maryland. People saw the car, and saw that it worked. He died mysteriously and this man said he thought someone in the oil industry murdered him, while tears rolled down his face.
Another co - worker told me her neighbor was an inventor and he was rich, but you did not know, because he walked around in overalls. He built an engine that used 30 percent less fuel, 30 percent less oil. Someone from the U.S. government paid him millions of dollars not to build it and not to patent it and not to sell it. He took the money. She told me this about 16 years ago too.
As if the guy couldn't make millions of dollars from that idea anyway and change the world at the same time lol.
@@blindi6326 or get vanished...
@@blindi6326 I'm sure there wasn't much of a choice for the guy...more like a threat. It really sucks how the government controls so many aspects of our life without us even realizing it.
@@JB-lp9xr 😆
@@JB-lp9xr Willie Nelson's tour van ran on french fries grease.
My uncle who passed away in 1974 told me he new of a guy in the 50's that invented a carburetor that could get 75 MPG and that an oil company bought the patent and shelved it.
I've heard about a carburetor like that too, my dad worked at Chrysler during the 60s and 70s in Detroit
Famed stock car racing mechanic Smokey Yunick had what he called an Adiabatic engine that got 100MPG in a Dodge Omni. Believe it or not, it was invented by a General Motors engineer. He offered the idea to GM, they considered it carefully and turned it down. So he asked if it was ok to give it to Smokey and they told him to go ahead. Smokey Yunick had a long association with Chevrolet and Pontiac racing teams and knew a lot of executives and engineers in Detroit.
To get the results he got, he needed to run the engine very hot. This made it very efficient when it came to turning heat into energy but it meant if the slightest thing went wrong you could burn up your motor in the blink of an eye.
Every major city had trolleys like San Fran. Ford and Firestone bought them and scrapped them for metal. Forcing the public to buy their product. Cars and tires
Yeah, it's a fun conspiracy theory based on some fact and coincedence but that's not exactly how it happened.
A surging middle class and the consumerism of a vibrant post war america drove (no pun intended) people to explore the country and achieve the dream of a new house and shiny big car in the garage.
did major corporations play a role? of course they did, especially in LA (Roger Rabbit, anyone?) however it was a confluence of world events and the upward mobility or a previously struggling middle class that really killed railcars.
Because as the middle class became more successful they left the big cities. Which led to urban decay as the suburbs became popular and only poor and minorities still lived in the cities.
DuPont
@@linnymaemullins3319 3M
p d
You mean where the population density is way higher? See Europe has certain advantages, a major one being that it isn’t separated by ridiculously huge sections of just rural “nothingness”. Another being that it is fairly homogenous in culture and ideals. This all adds up to them having nicer things in some regards. But in other regards the USA has just as many advantages. Usually for the exact same reasons. Cheaper housing would be an obvious one.
They also lobbied for the term "j walking." At the time roads weren't built for cars, they were large sidewalks for things with legs, horses, people, farm animals. To sell cars they had to get people off the streets.
He met with government officials at a Cracker Barrel in Tennessee. He also invented something called the Telluride. Look up Stan Meyer water car
Prep or Die yes! I should of read the comments first! He was at a meeting with GM or Chrysler execs and it wasn’t the first time he met with them. I believe his brother is still telling his story! Oh and his car was stolen when they got back.
Stories like this scare the shit out of me because I’m always working on things that will revolutionize the world but it’s a dangerous game. If they don’t buy you out they can shut you down. Permanently
It's a hoax. You have to be really ignorant about Science to think that was a real thing.
@@jimmykelly2809 doucheiest comment ever. Good work
@Nedd Flanders right? What a tool shed lol
I knew a guy in Florida who was his friend ( Stanley Meyers) and investor. He rode in the water car. Also he had a torch, welder that ran on the same tech. I’ve seen it and it worked.
Why do I even bother? Why do I comment on RUclips? Am I trying to show the whole internet how clever I am? Who cares? What a waste of time. Look at my dog. I roped him into this.
@@godforreal7355 type In hydro tech water HHO generator Torch it was about 12 years ago when I saw Meyers Machine. They are being produced around the world now in different versions. Even cheap ones on sale on Amazon LoL
As an engineer it hurts me to think the number of people that don’t understand that this car is pointless
“How did it work?”
“I don’t remember but it was super-groovy.”
That’s what Nicola Tesla was working on, he had hundreds of patents
yup and after his death, everything just 'disappeared'. Not to mention his Car that ran on wireless energy that he wanted to implement together with his Wardenclyffe Project.
JP Morgan famously saying “if anyone can get electricity anywhere, then where do we put the meter?”. And thus killed the project in its infancy.
@@laylobinson5839 Even the rare Tesla journals that were found by random folks years after Tesla's death. Theirs stories that "people" came asking and took the journals.
FBI showed up to his apartment hotel room in NYC
Ask your president. Well, if you really wanted to learn something, your presidents dead uncle John Trump.
Stop the Tesla wackiness. He was brilliant and he deserves credit for some of his innovations, but lots of is ideas were far beyond practical and common sense
Interrlestingly enough the generator assist is what all the dodge rams after 2020 use. A retro fit system would be very, very difficult to do as it'd have to be made for every specific model, the generators might be easy but the integration would be hard. A way more promising one that's on the market are electric backends for cars.
Generator assist is being used in a lot of cars, now: Mercedes, BMW, (not sure about Audi), Volvo, etc...
Yeah hes describing "light" hybrid technology like its some new shit. Its been around about 100 years
Brendooooonnnnnnnnn
@@Edwar3505 Hell, electric cars been around forever, but ICE took off instead. Can't exactly remember the reason why, but wouldn't be surprised if it was a combination of Oil barons and the great Current war during that time. They also had steam powered cars, which I always thought was cool.
@@ryanshannon7703 ICE engines took over due to the energy density of gasoline vs batteries. Its was a no brainer, 1/3 gallon of gasoline weighs about 2.5 lbs and stores as much energy as a 1000 lb battery (the lead-acid variety of the time)
Late model Dodge Rams have that alternator assist that Jonathan Ward is talking about right now
I actually was involved in the development of one of these ion exchange fuel cells. We had a trailer that was a mini-home to exhibit the technology and demonstrate it in use. It ran on hydrazine and was paired with a set of solar panels on the roof of the trailer. We generated a lot of excitement and attracted a number of interested parties. But when the fuel cells failed after nine months in use the company could not solve the technical issues involved. And yes it was
Sorry about that ..... And yes it was very expensive.
so when it stopped working, the people who made it couldnt figure out how to fix it?
Happens. Company buys patent rights, builds a product and has no idea how it really works. My laservue is sitting in my basement still.... $6000 for a rptv that had a laser light engine that was supposed to last over 20k hours... think it had 2k when it goofed.... still the only display device I know of that could reproduce over 100% of the colors visible to humans.... ripppppp to mitsubishi tvs
I studied Stanley Myers back in high school. One of the most influential stories I have ever studied. He designed small hydrogen generators that replaced the spark plugs. His design converted ANY combustion engine into "water powered".
Bullshit........you have no concept of thermodynamics.
@@jb-xc4oh You sir... should do your research before you open your mouth. A hydrogen generator, or "HHO generator" is what fueled his water powered car. Water, electricity applied with a resonant frequency and electrolytes are all you need to separate the H20 molecule. Apply this within an insulated capsule with the proper spacing of electrodes and you have yourself a "reactor", as Mr. Myers called it. Thermal dynamics do not keep hydrogen from powering a combustion engine 😉
@@Moore_Power Oh really. Show me a car that runs on water and I'll show you a con artist....its bullshit and I'll tell you why. Thermal dynamics do come into play, hydrogen does have a thermal energy content just like all fuels do. Its problem is its energy density, a pound of hydrogen occupies a very large volume compared to liquid fuels and here is where your hydrogen generator falls flat on its face. To produce the volume of hydrogen needed to continuously run even a 3.5 liter engine would require a "reactor" the size of two small cars. That's one problem, the other problem is where does the electricity come from to power the reactor. Your reactor is just a fancy term for the electrolysis of water. Have you any idea how much electrical power is needed to break down water. In order to produce the thermal equivalent of a gallon of gasoline you need to expend roughly 47Kw of electrical power to produce the equivalent thermal energy of hydrogen by the electrolysis of water. Where in the hell is the 47Kw of electrical energy going to come from. Not from the puny alternator in a car it only produces 1.2Kw, if that. The average single family home is limited to about 12Kw draw from the grid. Have you any idea how large a 47Kw electrical generator is and how much horsepower its engine requires to continuously provide 47Kw of power.....about 124 horsepower. Even if you did build something like this, how would you start the engine in the morning when the reactor isn't producing any hydrogen. How would you be able to vary your speed while on the highway......it gets very very complicated doesn't it. This is why I call running a car on water bullshit. Do you think engineers are stupid and have not thought about any of this like its some big dark secret. This is why hydrogen fuel cells are used and Toyota did build a hydrogen race car to test out some of their ideas......you can find this on RUclips. However for obvious reasons they used compressed hydrogen stored in a large tank at 10,000 psi. The car had a 1.6L turbocharged engine and here is the root problem of gaseous hydrogen.......they could drive only 28 miles before they had to change fuel tanks. They had to change fuel tank 35 times during a 1000 mile endurance race. So yeah, I call running a car on water bullshit....!!
@@jb-xc4oh you seem like a pretty reasonable person... Please do more research. HHO generators are above 17% production efficiency on a GM alternator. And where are you getting the math that a reactor the size of 2 small cars is needed? Hydrogen can be explosive with oxygen concentrations between 18 and 60 percent, while regular gasoline is between 1 and 3 percent.
@@jb-xc4oh and that old Volkswagen dune buggy with a GM alternator that Stanley Myers created was, and is 100% real. He traveled to Science conventions with it as well. There are many many videos, and patent breakdowns of the car J B. Hell, the first hydrogen powered car was first designed in 1807 by a swiss inventor. There definitely wasn't a high pressure tank on that 4 wheeled wagon, lol. Actually it was just a balloon... Check out Rodger Billings when you get a chance, too. Very interesting as well. 👍🏼 Oh yeah, and there's G.H. Garrett. Dallas, Texas man who created an electrolytic carburetor. And, who the F**k said it's a big dark secret? It's all about efficiency. You're cracking off info, and it's quite interesting how much you DON'T want a HHO generator to be efficient enough to power a small combustion engine. And the US department of defense bought Mr. Myers patents... Why would they do that if they were not worth anything? In today's day and age having a very dangerous and inefficient HHO generator doesn't make sense. That doesn't mean it's not possible. Good luck with yourself...
Look up a company called Terralogix in Quebec, Canada. They invented a type of carburetor that allowed a 4 cylinder Toyota Tercel engine to burn 98% of the fuel delivered. It ran for a half hour in a closed garage while a television news crew filmed the demonstration. An exhaust analyzer was used to measure any pollution but the readings were almost nil. Nobody needed to wear breathing equipment. When the demo was over the Terralogix manager and the inventor of the device announced they were taking the car to the Auto Show in Japan. There never was a follow up but Terralogix later said they had "shelved" the device.
That actually doesn't make sense. Exhaust is usually H2O and co2. I'm about to go research this and see. There must be pollution when you burn fuel
if this is true that means climate change would also be a hoax because no one is that evil
My dad told me stories about having a self-winding watch, and most adults don't even remember the ones we wound manually. It's like we're living backwards.
lol, it's called an automatic watch and timex sells them for $100
@@kevinharrison5620 awesome. Glad to know they exist (again/still). Now who will buy me one for Christmas, and how will I be able to know it's keeping good time?
@@nunontherunnumberone Decent automatic watches (self winding) are about +/- 10 seconds a day. Need good time? Cheap casio battery watch is about +/- 5 seconds a month and change the battery every 2 years. Self winding automatic watches have to be worn so they wind themselves. Of course your phone will keep the best time due to being tied to the internet with the atomic clock so it resets itself every now and then. Auto watches are for status and situations where you don't have access to change a watch battery and stuff like that. Watch Joe Rogan's little clip where he talks about watches. He also gave his buddy Lex Friedman a $12,000 Omega watch.
I am country poor. The sun and moon are my best bet, but knowing 'the time' is important for keeping 'a job'.
#richerthanyouwilleverknowormaybeyouaretoo
We will never forget the shelved EV1s either....
ArkusTheGreat I earned my degree in automotive technology a few years ago, and was really surprised to read about those in our electricity and electronics textbook. I had no idea they had a viable hybrid that long ago. I think they had an assist motor powered by an oversized alternator.
EV1 sucked. It ran on lead acid batteries and had a range of about 50 miles. I remember a clip from the film with Ed Begley Jr saying, “That’s all you need to get to work and back.” Cars are more than commuter boxes. Work from home. You save way more energy than commuting 50 miles.
Specifcialy Large Format NiMH. That had other uses outside of cars. We're only seeing it now with Lithium Ion. FYI NiMH energy density is about 60-70% of Lithium Ion.
@@zoroisdead EV1 was all electric hence the name
@@bdfunke your right about it sucking but it's range was further than 50 miles. It was about 110 miles
A dying man's last words are what he believes to be true the most in his entire life.
Maybe in movies and TV where dying people are of sound mind and conveniently get a last minute moment of clarity. In the moments before people die their faculties are failing including their brain. Who can know what's really going on in the mind of someone about to pass away?
@@sswpp8908 Ok Dr. Williams
@@Ironwind1972 You're taking on a lot of faith that words coming from a dying brain would be coherent and well considered. They could just be a result of whatever happens to be running through at that moment.
@@sswpp8908 Why are you trolling the comment?? It was said with sentimental value. If your father was dying and told you that he loved you and regretted all the mistakes he made with you, are you going to just blow that off as a dying person not in the right state of mind? Damn man.
@@Ironwind1972 The only reference to last words in this video were from a man who believed he was poisoned in his last moments. What does this have to do with my Dad?
Stanley Meyer died in 1998 after he ran out of a restaurant yelling "they killed me". At the time he was meeting with 2 Belgian investors who were trying to buy the rights to his invention.
This is true. And he was certainly found to be poisoned. Fact, not conjecture.
so i got really into this. i was learning about cars at the time, i built a few hydrogen generators and hooked em up to various cars. i studied his papers and notes, it actually got me learning basic physics etc. what i found out is its bullshit lol... sorry. i really wanted it to be true, but the more i learned the more meyer looked like a snake oil salesman.
@@cypherbane139 😂😂u are a liar sir. There were no notes or papers of his to study from. His workshop was ransacked and his papers were confuscated by the fbi. Liar.
@garlickman But it isn't.
Burning Hyrogen gives you energy because the process of combining hydrogen and oxygen releases energy.
You have to put at least the same amount of energey into the water if you want to pull hydrogen out of it.
If there was some chemical or whatever which you could use to split water into hydrogen and oxygen so you can use the hydrogen as a fuel, generating said chemical would be very energy intensive.
It would seem that you run you car on water but in reality you would run you car on said chemical.
The only way to pull "free" energy out of regular water is by fusion.
There is plenty of free energy in there. I is not mystical or special.
Every boring star in the universe does just that. But since the environment inside a star is rather extreme we cannot just copy that simple process but struggle since 50 years to build anything besides a bomb.
I also looked into many forms of what people call free energy, I understand the rules, but a single atom has an enormous amount of energy if you can harness it it, but anyways... Meyers had some patents out I n this technology with many details on how it worked, I don't know how or if they can be accessed anymore, but he wasn't using electrolysis, the system was constantly measuring the resonance of the water, conditioning it with high voltage pulsed frequency and then it would enter the engine through a special injector that was also high voltage pulsed almost like he was making plasma, it also would recycle some of the exhaust back into the cylinders because the hydrogen would burn to fast so it need a non oxygen gas to help fill the combustion chamber, he made all the electronics out of old tech because the newer style semiconductors couldn't pulse the power right. What I could find was very interesting and it looked like he was trying to make a retro fit kit the had the electronics and injectors around the time he died, also this was all based off an old dune buggy with a VW engine which also caught my attention had 2 when I was in high school, I'm pretty sure some of this stuff is real but we aren't allowed to have it, I could go on and on about it, see it you can find info on a couple US soldiers who brought a generator back from Germany, it used a common bosch generator slightly modified with a pretty large capacitor, the 2 reverse engineered it and where making and selling them, you pull start it and it would make 300 watts until the bearings or the brushes went out, many witnesses to this
RIP Aaron Salter, the latest casualty of technology for the masses
My uncle was the CEO of Rolls-Royce jet engines in Columbus Ohio and he told us about the engine that ran on water.. always wondered what happened to it
I was in the small town in Ohio where there was a story about that guy. Looks true to me.
That’s a compressed natural gas fuel cell. Still used today.
@D Sauce hydrogen fuel cell generators are a known entity. It’s the electrolysis that’s energy intensive and where you lose most of the energy
shelbyz1988 referring to bloom boxes in my comment.... I get the sense you’re talking about HHO. HHO can increase the completeness of fuel burn per engine cycle. There is no on vehicle method to convert water to hydrogen gas at the volumetric efficiency required to operate a motor vehicle simply because you would have to start with twice the energy or have onboard access to energy source that on it’s own would be fully capable of operating the motor vehicle without the use of a combustion process.
Edit also just remembered that I believe Toyota and kenworth are marketing a PEM based hydrogen cell for semi trucks. They have to refill at special stations and cost a lot but the concept is starting to become economically viable enough to consider for freight vehicles on port duty. Not quite open road ready because filling stations are sparse. These things will cruise at 65 tho and spit out oxygen and water.
DescriptionThe Bloom Energy Server or Bloom Box is a solid oxide fuel cell power generator made by Bloom Energy, of Sunnyvale, California, that takes a variety of input fuels, including liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons produced from biological sources, to produce electricity at or near the site where it will be used.
Scott Xavier exactly a very capable fuel cell that primarily operates off supremely abundant natural gas.
I remember seeing a article in mother earth magazine decades ago, that was about adding water injection to an engine. Did something like increase compression, cant remember the exact details. Took a car that got 20 mpg and bumped it up to over 100 mpg. It was based off water injection technology they used back in ww2 on bomber aircraft to give them a boost of power, when fully loaded on takeoff.
@@UHK-Reaper Meth injection?.. Oh. Methane. Lol.
They do something similar to cars in places like Pakistan and cuba
My Dad was in the RAF during WW2 and told me a similar story.
@@ajcarr1965 methanol*
@@ajcarr1965 metahlated spirits
I wish I had a car that ran on conspiracy theories.
2020 and we still don't have flying cars powered by their own personal nuclear reactor.
Natural Hypertrophy ruclips.net/video/ZBInhPFFVog/видео.html
You forgot “fuck you marty McFly!” 😂
People can't drive on roads and be safe. Ya really wanna be flying around where you plummet to the ground when some a$$hole runs a red light cause their in a hurry. Not only do ya get tboned ya then fall from the sky
Bloom Energy, that makes Bloom Boxes, is still in business. We use their fuel cells that convert natural gas to electricity, without combustion. All depends on the price of electricity, if they are worth the investment and achieve a positive ROI. No mystery to them, simply a chemical reaction.
I put an unbounded vacuum inside a temporal field until a world developed. I then introduced the people of this world to the wonders of electricity in the form of a device I call a flooble crank.
No more Bloom Boxes!
@Jiang Dashan that's.....the....joke....
Most with a brain realize inventing a term that will belittle ideas as crazy is a good strategy. Conspiracy theory is that term.
I HAVE THE DOCUMENTS
We meet again... and I’m going to need those documents now?!.. *ninja pose*
I swear to the gods that I don’t know/follow you at all. We must have the same interests, because I see you once a fucking day, it seems hahahaha.
figured that out long ago my friend. Always good to see other mindlike people.
I still remember when Bush made his announcement after 9/11 when i was a kid and he said: Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th. Me to my dad: Daddy, what is he talking about? what conspiracy theories? It just happenned yesterday, how could these theories be made SO fast & spread so fast? Why isnt he actually mentioning one of these theories? My Dad: ................ (with a look on his face like) *FK me this kid knows to hit it where it hurts*
The problem doesn’t lie within the word itself but rather the connotation it carries due to its usage
@@brianbritton1694 These documents you speak of sound like nothing more than a conspiracy theory. 🙌
Flat earth really tainted the term and all credible conspiracy theories for good, wouldn't be surprised if higher powers powered the flat earth movement
Excellent Analysis, Deployed Worldwide Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library. Thank You.
Back in the early to mid 90's, I heard the same story about the same guy - from 2 different guys who didn't now each other. I heard these stories about 5 years apart. The story goes like this - there was this guy who lived in a trailer not too far from where I live (western NC), and this guy had created a car that ran on an air compressor. He supposedly first did this with a lawn mower, then with a ford pinto. Supposedly a big oil or gas or auto company offered him something like a couple of million dollars to buy it, and he knew it had a lot more commercial potential than that, so he turned it down. Then right after he turned it down, his trailer and shop / garage beside the trailer were gone, the yard was plowed then planted with grass, and there was no trace of the guy. Supposedly they "disappeared" him. The first time I heard this story, it sounded like BS, but to hear it again about 5 years later, exactly the same story, exactly the same location, from another guy who didn't know the first guy, makes me think there's something to it.
Yeah that is some airtight credentials there.
The story I heard. This guy in Tremonton UT invented a gas improving carburetor. Standard Oil came and offered him money for the invention. He told them, no, he wanted to grow it. He came home that night, the same guy was talking to his wife at the front door, As he passed the Standard Oil guy said, "I can give you the money or your widowed wife." He took the money.
About 50 years old and from about 10 years old and on. The guy built engine ran in water and he disappeared. Supposedly gov ended him. Idk.
Urban legends never die.....people should learn some more physics and math.
@@jb-xc4oh they never ask what powered the compressor 🤣🤣
Stand Meyer was the water guy and he was poisoned at a restaurant
@Angelo Stevens- I think he’s implying he was poisoned to death
@@electricchurchmedia1187 lol
@@omarbernal3804 he was poisoned yes. Also, he made it so efficient that you could change ANY vehicles spark plugs and they electricuted to water right before the cylinder and it send hydrogen into cell. Got about 50% mpg increase
@@tannerfehring Wow ! You obviously have no grasp of science.
@@jwalker7000 with the help of others I will make this mans ideas great again!
The search continues for mythical free energy machines and perpetual motion devices.
it all got bought up and shelled .... you know ... and all scientists and engineers are morons /s
oh0stv is english your second language
We had it. Nikola Tesla had technology that used the free space around us. It was very efficient. Nikola Tesla was killed by the govt and they took his work because free energy is what. FREE
@@jamesworley5725 wenigstens hab ich eine
@@masonventrone3653 dude i basically lost a friend because he got stuck up with the idea of plasma spools and free energy.
He went and signed up with the Keshe university, spend quite some money on it. Now 5 years later he got no where.
Don't believe stuff somebody said online. Do your own logic. The best reason in this word not to shelf technology is the capitalistic system itself. Nobody could withhold essential technology because it would make more profit to sell it.
you really need to talk about that cop that was unfortunately killed in the buffalo shooting, he posted a video 6 years ago of a hydrogen gas powered car i hope u really get to read this comment.
The process is called "Electrolysis".
I'm near 60 and the best thing about age is the lack of sexual desire or demand really when your young. Sex is a very demanding indulgence that makes drastic changes in peoples lives. Getting control of sexual desire really strengthened me in so many other areas. I recommend it highly.
A good partner does the same for your soul - frees you to be great.
When I was a kid they had these " power pellets" they were developing. We had a school tour of the factory. These pellets were supposed to power everything. We got a depleted sample to bring home. I have never seen or heard of them since. Can't find the pellet anywhere. But my parents remembered everything cause I came home all excited about the school trip. And showed them how the pellet was going to be installed.
Thorium pellets
Look up Starlite material too. 😉
They didn’t continue with them because even though Nuclear is less efficient and less safe, Thorium didn’t produce a military grade by-product. So Thorium was less profitable.
i like how joes avoids awkward conversations and changes subject thats a professional who understands his work at his best
“Self sustaining energy creation”.
Leaving aside this breaches laws of thermodynamics, he just described a perpetual motion machine.
These were fuel cells. Like hydrogen fuel cell powered cars
Plausible. What would matter is the energy effiecency. The succesful conversaion percentage. Wasn't the first atom bomb only like 1-8% effiecent?
Look it up, they are still around, the use natural gas instead of hydrogen and for some reason they aren't very economical cause everyone stopped using them. But as far as I can tell they are a fuel cell with a chemical oxidizer in them "one that presumably has to be replaced in time"
@@elijahhmarshall they create more co2 than conventional means.
@@cklee_ Did not know this! Do you know how they compare economically to something like a backup combustion generator?
@@elijahhmarshall www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/the-bloom-is-off-bloom-energy/
no idea. Not an expert. seems to be 2x the price per output of a cogeneration unit.
They had electric cars in Japan in the late 1800's. Just imagine where that technology would be now if big oil didn't get involved.
I can't imagine that we'd be in a better place if we were in the habit of choosing inferior technology. Don't believe all this "conspiracy theory" stuff. If you do unbiased research you'll find "inventions" like these were either complete frauds or they consisted of one or two genuine good ideas but were still a number of ideas short of having something new and feasible. Good people are currently and legitimately working to solve the problems to get this kind of stuff working. Bloom was/is close, but they are still WAY short of the goals they promised they could hit. Fraudsters are seeking investors because they claim they already have these things working, and kooky conspiracy theorists claim that some eccentric loner somehow already got it working two days before his mysterious death. I call BS on 99% of it.
@@prof_aw3som014 that's not what I read in the RUclips comments
@@mobilegameplaywalkthroughs990 Your argument is somewhat contradictory. You are right the ideas were a little short of a full taco but thats because they werent heavily invested in the way they are now. As you said there are some " great people" working on it. There were great people back then too however they didnt get a chance to push forward technology do to lobbying, back door deals, big business etc. It isnt a conspiracy theory to say that self interest and profit motive can at times stand in the way of inovation that threatens their very being. Thats just plain sense
....it's not a hidden fact. And the engines they had back then we're too heavy and inefficient, same goes for batteries. The only reason it's viable now, is due to modern production and chemical knowledge. It would barely change anything at all
@@GoalOrientedLifting Again you are refusing to address the issue. Im not saying the technology was fully viable or perfect. The discussion around "who killed the electric car" and other works is about a lack of investment so that the technology could become viable.
Guy: they had these things called bloomboxes
Joe: what is it
Guy: I think Google was using them
Joe: what is it
Guy: self sustaining
Joe: what is it
Jon just keeping Joe on the edge of knowing and suspense.
@Will.J Bloom Energy is the company that makes them
Bloom box is a planar solid oxide fuel cell and they run off natural gas.
@@methos1999 Bloom sells the power from the units for 5-15% less than buying power from the grid, rather than selling the units themselves. The fuel cells have an operational life expectancy of around 10 years; based on predictions on fuel costs, the "break even" point for those who purchase the device is around 8 years. Bloom Energy traces its roots to work performed by K.R. Sridhar in connection with creating a technology to convert Martian atmospheric gases to oxygen for propulsion and life support. 2 is 20% of 10.
0:4:52 Literally the new F150 and Ram 1500 have this exact design. Good idea I'd say...
The water car dude met with government officials at a restaurant and then came running out of the restaurant yelling “they poisoned me”. Then died in the street.
I like how many people have commented about that man, yet every story has been different. Y'all need to work together if y'all are gonna talk shit.
I believe it because that's their money has it been on the gold standard since the 60s or 70s it is basically backed by oil that's why they call it the petrodollar without oil being a hot commodity our money would be worthless in many many countries would collapse
Ryan Morrow hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
His name was Stephen Meyers I believe. If I remember correctly his electrolysis system used the Tesla pulsed longitudinal electric impulse wave to generate the electrolysis reaction far more efficiently than can be done using normal transverse AC or DC electromagnetic waves. He supposedly broke the device up into 3 patents to sneak it thru the patent office censors for this kind of stuff where they usually catch it and file it away... ever heard about those 5580 secret patents the American Federation of Scientists is always tracking to see how many the government are hiding and burying now behind the guise of "National Security"? If they were really *that* important to National Security they would be in a vault 10 miles under a mountain to never be heard of on any list under 24/7/365 armed guard by an agency that doesnt officially exist, not on a list anyone can get FOIA access too. Cmon what kind of amatuers do you think you're dealing with when the fate of who controls the world is at stake...
Anyone who is interested in this kind of stuff should start with Eric Dollard's lectures on Tesla and electrical engineering of 120 years ago and then look into Thomas Townsend Brown's work.
Edit: fixed spelling and grammatical errors from autocorrect.
P.S. Read Ether Technology - A Rational Approach to Gravity Control by Rho Sigma
Even Einstein didnt believe in the constancy of the speed of light!!!
Tesla believed in the Aether and he basically developed the modern world's energy grid, I would be inclined to believe him or else his inventions would never have worked. People still havent been able to replicate magnitude of the level of his work 120 years later... at least outside of classified defense department contracts that the public would NEVER hear about...
I just imagine him sitting at a round table, smoking weed with donna, Eric, and Kelso
Mai Nyigguh it’s a car, that runs on water man!!
He's way too comfortable with being unintelligent. Thousands of podcasts and he's surprised by the same things every time. Nikola Tesla is greater than Joe Rogan will ever be. Joe Rogan could literally bathe in DMT and never think of alternating current.
@Connection Lost so the whole cast are scientologist? That's a lie.
lol!
The Chad HAHAHA 👍
While innovation quashing is definitely something that happens when big companies get too big, the water powered car was an absolute hoax. There's simply no way thermodynamics would allow that kind of energy to come from water. What was suggested was a perpetual motion device and the guy never offered any explanations or schematics for how it worked.
To this day it hasn't been explained because the real explanation is probably a small DC motor on the rear axle tied to a shitload of batteries with a water tank sitting on top.
And people have no understanding that while water does have hydrogen and oxygen in it (duh, H2O), which can be turned into a burnable combination of gaseous hydrogen and gaseous oxygen, the electrolysis and the subsequent burning have conversion losses, which is wasted energy. You end up with less energy out of burning the gases than you put in with the electricity for electrolysis. This is also one of the reasons that "HHO" electrolysis added to internal combustion engines is bull$hit.
It is called cold fusion and happens when you run electric current through water directly it separates the h20 into its components.
@@04938dreadfelix It's actually called electrolysis and, not only does it not PRODUCE energy, it takes a dickload of energy to do.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis_of_water
could listen to his stories all day
Energy has to come from somewhere. Water is a low energy state compared to H2 and O2. It doesn't have potential to do work unless those molecules are separated through electrolysis. Something else has to put the energy in first.
Same with running on charged particles from the air. The potential for charged particles to do work comes from a separation of + charge and - charge. For any car to use whatever supposed charge is in the air it would first need to have a strong charge opposite polarity of what's in the air. That charging process done to the vehicle can only be created by energy somewhere else.
this really isnt the place for reasoned analysis bro
SHUt up science Man U need to open ur third eye weed makes you smart I promise
Yes, "the charging process done to the vehicle can only be created by energy somewhere else." Nevertheless, in any given room there may be a significant ratio of charged to non-charged particles. If there is a sufficient gradient with a reasonable efficiency rate then work can be done until the difference in potential energy becomes nil. The significant question for me becomes: is the potential energy sufficiently high to effectively run the engine, assuming that the engine has sufficient efficiency? Also, is the net positive or negative charge in the air reliably created and how is it generated anyway?
@Angelo Stevens Essentially we are making an analogy with the common process associated with compliance with the second law of thermodynamics. This is heat exchange. It takes a steady flow of energy or volumetric mixing [ and/or compression] for an area to be significantly heated. If an object "wants" to exploit the "potential" energy in the heated space then it must not be equal to the temperature of the heated space. If the object is colder then it can absorb some of the energy of the system. If it is hotter then it can give up some of it's energy till it is equal. This is the gradient. But the analogy is not perfect. Heat exchange involves energy flow from one type of source positive whereas charged particle exchange involves energy exchange from two types negative and positive. Also I have not mentioned entropy or the exchange of information. Imagine if there are two batteries on the vehicle; one able to selectively absorbed positively charged particles and one the negatively charged particles. Then the potential energy flow between the object and the room depends on the sum of charged particles in the room rather than the difference between one type [gradient] of particle. The information required to differentiate the particles requires energy that is always greater than the potential energy the object can receive. But there can be regions where the entropy is lower than the average entropy of the "world". This might include aspects that facilitate information acquisition, within the limits of particle-energy physical limits [ i.e. qcd rules, schrodinger/bohr quantum rules, relativistic rules] .
@Angelo Stevens My first response is an attempt to tie in the entropy rule and simplistic information theorey to explain why exploiting the potential energy of charged particles encounters limits in efficiency and effectiveness generally.
Elon Musk
*Hold my blunt
Elon is a false profit! He is a true con man! His tech is old, his quality is shotty at best, and his company makes no money, all funded by Grant's and donations!
@@dred5375 they don't understand bro. Just let them be, they will all know one day!!
@@dred5375 , I agree on the false profit idea. but i dont think elon knows it. He thinks he is in control, when in reality he is being allowed to succeed. The tesla vehicles are more pollutant to the earth than any combustion engine and if/when we are all forced to use them, they can be controlled centrally, just like minority report, or like the voting machines.
@@gial8862 You are correct! He is being groomed! He believes he is smart, he isn't sure himself though.
I remember bloom boxes. They were very promising for homeowners as well. They were able to power a home all year long for very little cost. All you had to do was buy the chemicals that created the chemical reaction, but like everything that is promising to the public it gets bought off and shut down by big business.
Bloom box came out in popularity around the same time solar energy became extremely popular. Bloom box was going to win solar energy by a lot because people didn’t not like the aesthetics on the roof but the bloom box would produce the same energy using water and would not be an eye sore.
An unfortunate truth!
@Heloise O'Byrne so then why did G O O G L E purchase it and use it to power their buildings if it was so dangerous?
@Heloise O'Byrne g o o g l e it. It’s their headquarters in california.
Stanley Meyer figured out a way to run an internal combustion engine on pure distilled water and was murdered because of the threat his invention posed to a Big Oil corporation ..These companies are ruthless and won't let any progress come between their profit margins!
Stanley Meyer was a grifter who lied to his investors and was subsequently convicted of fraud.
His "water engine" ran on gasoline.
You deserve a better class of hero.
I love these guys who have somehow managed to break the first and second law of thermodynamics but never actually tell you how.
It doesn't break the laws of thermodynamics and it's not free energy...But guess what, it does work... the problem is it's nearly impossible to get it to work and if you don't understand what's going on you will get exposed to radiation.
Its
@@BradKwfc Okay so it works. fantastic I believe you.Now can you please show or explain to me how, and I mean exactly how these machines work. Because unless I am missing something The Second Law of Thermodynamics says that entropy in the universe must always increase. It's an immutable law of physics, and it's the reason you can't get free energy or perpetual motion machines. I am not taking the piss mate I am genuinely interested in anyone who could solve our looming energy crisis.
Thank you for you sane comment.
@@normanswindon518
You expect me to explain it all and give away 13 years of research in the youtube comment section?
I'll give you the short version, the long version may be released someday in the future when (or if I ever) finish my book.
First off, I don't believe in free energy and try to stay as far away from that crowd as possible so please don't associate me with that kind of thinking.
If you understand electrolysis its easy to see why so many scientists claimed Stan was a fraud.
Stan stated that he used low current and high voltage to split the water molecule and produce massive amounts of gas with very little energy.
The problem with that claim is:
1. Faraday's laws of electrolysis state that the volume of gas produced is directly proportional to the amount of electrons that flow into the reaction.
2. High voltage produces side reactions that release heat and reduce efficiency
3. There is NO such thing as free energy
I'm not sure how deep I'm willing to get into this so I'll keep it brief. Stan figured out a way to create a secondary source of electrons in which he used the high voltage to control the amount of electrons that flowed into the reaction.
But that's only half of the story, you also have to have Ions present.
Water naturally produces IONS, its called the 'Self Ionization of Water'. What occurs is that in water the molecules are polar (exhibit and + and - electric field) and they are always in motion. In specific instances water molecules and nearby molecules will orient in such a way where their electric fields add together (like batteries in series). When this happens molecules are split and they produce a Hydronium (H3O+) and Hydroxide (OH-) ion. Naturally the life of the IONs is very short, but the IONs can last longer if an external electric field is present. The 'self ionization of water' proves that an electric field with no current flow can actually split water molecules...But again you also have to have current flow and the self ionization of water does not produce enough IONs to explain what Stan was doing.
Within Stan's cells several different phenomena were occurring all at once. If you did not know what you were doing and somehow got it to work you would get exposed to radiation. So again there's a lot more going on than meets the eye.
The problem is getting it to work. I've spent 13 years, taught myself transformer and circuit design and have designed and tested numerous circuits etc and have still not had success. In reality getting it to work is almost impossible. First off, the water being split is used as an element in the circuit, the properties of water change with temperature, frequency, applied voltage etc. The circuit operates on two pulse frequencies that are overlaid onto each other, each frequency has to be sopt on, also, each frequency has to have a specific duty cycle and applied voltage which changes as the applied voltage changes. On top of that if your water cell is not properly shielded it will capacitively couple to nearby objects which will prevent the system from working.
Also, initial conditions must be met before the process will occur, and once you get the process occurring an adjustment too far will cause voltage spikes and throw the system out of operation.
Again-NOT free energy but extremely complex, nearly impossible to get to work, and can be dangerous if you don't take the proper precautions.
The freakin government got to him.
To who?
Lol he was just paid off to sell the patent so the oil companies could bury it
Hvac 2001 and turned his frogs guy
I was stoned one time and dreamt of a promising box. I swear it ran on bird poop, pop tarts,, and Pringle’s. Ford did it. Jamie, look it up.
I've been studying this old tech & talking about this for months now !
2:06 joe lets out his inner Owen Wilson
😂 . Dope username too
I’m dead 💀💀😂😂
Grove City Ohio, location of inventor who built the car that ran on water (actually hydrogen which was produced on board by electrolysis). He had many patents on parts of this tech, which have since expired. The device which divides the hydrogen from Oxygen in H2O can be easily built and installed in a car to add hydrogen to a gas engine, thereby greatly decreasing the amount of gas needed to run the car. The biggest hurdle seems to be the onboarding computers on modern cars which, eventually, defeat the incoming hydrogen and cause the gas intake to increase. Supposedly, though, this modification works well on an older car or truck.
Don't forget about the fuel filter around the 50s or 60s that could get huge mpg that got buried in the woods.
It was a carb idiot
@@2legitk10 it's ok that your mom doesn't hug you enough and you don't know who your real father is. You are still special
Aaron Salter Jr - security guard shot 5 times in Buffalo mass shooting - had just filed a patent for a water based engine for cars the week before he was killed. The last person who tried it (Stan Meyer) died believing that someone poisoned him.
There are probably easier more subtly ways to 'off' someone these days, but it does seem an incredible coincidence, especially as the man drove 200 miles from New York to kill black people. He could have done that in New York.
I get that it is somewhat funny in a wow kind of way but really though, to laugh at a genius who stated that they've killed him just breaks my heart.
This is where we need to be at. I've damn near lost my sense of humor because of our dismissive society.
"We are all fucked. We live in a simulation and we don't even know it. When we do find out indefinitely we will ignore it out of fear. We're so fucked." George Washington 1929
lol
I want the dev kit
Lmfaoooo
What 😂 I mean, I agree but did George really say that?
You're all ruining this for me sexually. .
As an engineering student in my last year, nothing i have studied leads me to believe in any of these inventions, in most cases they are not fake, just not competitive, the drawbacks being cleverly omitted from the demostrations.
It's basically like the perpetual motion machines, they all seem to work untill you build them yourself.
You don't believe you can split the oxygen/hydrogen from water and inject it into an engine to increase power or efficiency?
Of course you wouldn’t learn anything in engineering school that would lead you to think this is possible.
@@reecesullivan9985 yep. What he is learning is the fundamentals, or a version of them.
To think that's the be all end all is a bit silly. These people didn't garner the attention they did for something that didn't work.
@john doe copper telecommunication lines would heat up, melt, or even flash to vapor before we developed better insulation methods to prevent the free harvest of the earths electromagnetic field.
Tesla, as in the modern company with musk, should build this. All they need is a huge granite, or some other stone, slab, atleast a kilometre long, almost as thick. These can be found all over the earth just under the surface.
They could set up a tower that is in a particularly strong magnetic loop/arc, which they would measure with ground and drone based measuring equipment to determine the best placement for the tower.
The ultimate show would be if tgey powered the new electric plane with this tower. I have no idea of the ranges these things are capable of, but in oldschool teslas time it was a few kilometres, I'm sure modern stuff would be more efficient. If it's 15km that would allow a plane to charge while in flight before leaving the range of the tower. Vehicles would only need to be in their vicinity for x period of time to charge.
Wtf do you think I learn about then you morons, ex the hydrogen car is a real thing, the costs of hydrolysis and the extra complexity of any system that deals with gases are its drawbacks, it is well known technology, scientists worldwide are already working on this technology, it just seems like it's less efficient than an EV.
The thing abt earth's magnetic field is that it doesn't have energy, it will orient a compass, but it wont make it spin, it's just like gravity, you can't take energy out of it. If you don't trust engineers and scientists, we are not brainwashed, scientific education is based on demostrations and experimentations
The laws of thermal dynamics always bites them in the azz!!! 😂
A Bloom Box was simply a fuel cell. It ran on propane. It worked (a lot of the time) but was less than reliable. Still could be a viable option though.