A350 Is Creating PROBLEMS For Boeing. Here’s HOW

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 июн 2024
  • From A350’s Exceptional Qualities to its Unbelievable Feature installed by Airbus, these are the ways Airbus A350 is Destroying its competitors.
    And we gotta start with its composite material. A350 is the first Airbus aircraft which is largely made of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic.
    When the carbon fiber and plastic get combined, it makes the material much stronger than normal metals, and much lighter than the commonly used Aluminium. Also, this material is more resistant to corrosion, reduces net fuel burn and maintenance costs, which is simply amazing! But that doesn't mean the A350 had no pitfalls. Cuz when Qatar Airways forced a legal action against Airbus, things changed for the aircraft.
    Want to watch more, please SUBSCRIBE for many more videos like these.
    SUBSCRIBE: / @untoldaviation
    New Videos EVERY WEEK
    #a350 #airbus
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 241

  • @mijnordna
    @mijnordna Год назад +165

    I don’t think calling an airplane 'dangerous', in ANY context, is a good idea.

    • @chrisdickens4268
      @chrisdickens4268 Год назад +1

      Tell that to RUclips who promote videos with words like dangerous and destroyed in the title as people are more likely to click them

    • @simtill
      @simtill Год назад +8

      I would call an F-22 Raptor very dangerous, though.

    • @claudebylion9932
      @claudebylion9932 Год назад +15

      @@simtill what about 737 Max being even more dangerous 🙏

    • @alanfenick1103
      @alanfenick1103 Год назад

      Never denigrate your competition as it gives them a reason to fight back! Remember Boeing is a diverse multifaceted manufacturer with divisions and products that Airbus doesn’t. From weapons systems,information systems, and satellites to name a few! Airbus is in it’s ascendency for now with excellent products. Technology is constantly changing. In the past failure has been an impetus for change and innovation! Remember Boeing is indispensable for Defense and the US Government would never let Boeing fail, that’s fact. Lastly Boeing is not just one company it is a family of wider manufacturing scope than Airbus. Remember Airbus has had its failures too!

    • @airplane_guy396
      @airplane_guy396 Год назад

      It is so noisy

  • @marloncardoso264
    @marloncardoso264 Год назад +46

    Boeing will take a lot of time to recover. This is what happens when you put accountants, financials and all these troupes commanding a company that's by definition an engineering company.

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад +1

      say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

    • @kirilmihaylov1934
      @kirilmihaylov1934 Год назад +1

      ​@@truth2hurts nicely said

    • @Samguy55
      @Samguy55 Год назад +1

      @@truth2hurts another Boeing hater

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад

      @@Samguy55 flying coffins maker fanboy

    • @Samguy55
      @Samguy55 Год назад +2

      @@truth2hurts said by someone who’s never flown before.

  • @TheLRider
    @TheLRider Год назад +19

    I'm a lot more comfortable knowing that Airbus know how to manage product changes effectively and safely. I still think that Boeing has illustrated many times now that it is struggling in this area and will continue to undermine it's product's safety record and reliability. Serious issues for any organisation.

  • @byteme9718
    @byteme9718 Год назад +28

    The A350 is just the best flying experience, the only compromise is sharing it with others.

    • @BXRB
      @BXRB Год назад

      Thats airbusses job they sell it to airlines

    • @JPB57
      @JPB57 Год назад

      Saying that one is better without argument is a conversation at a bar

    • @byteme9718
      @byteme9718 Год назад

      @@JPB57 Just fly long haul on the A350 and tell me what aircraft comes close.

    • @JPB57
      @JPB57 Год назад

      @@byteme9718 Ok, I understand. Just a feeling, no technical argument. But I also flew many times as passenger on B787, and A350. Except the interior fitting which is up to the company (not the manufacturer) I don’t see any difference, except that on the B787 the air is not coming from the engines, but straight from outside so there is absolutely no possibility of any contamination. That is not the case on the A350 which is a conventional aircraft modernized.

    • @byteme9718
      @byteme9718 Год назад

      @@JPB57 As a passenger that's all that's needed. As a passenger I also try and avoid Boeing because of their appalling quality control.

  • @NikonF5user
    @NikonF5user Год назад +5

    I cannot stand it when RUclipsrs post video of planes other than the type they're discussing. You eventually did mention the 787, but you were talking about VA A350s while showing the 787...

  • @luisvasconcelos1053
    @luisvasconcelos1053 Год назад +8

    The only problem with Boeing is Boeing itself

    • @heetz_96
      @heetz_96 Год назад +1

      Thats probably why they managed to secure record breaking firm sales order from Air india and Saudia Airline including their new Riyadh airline.

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад

      say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

  • @altoclef6688
    @altoclef6688 Год назад +12

    Compare the number of orders between the A350 and it's competitors and it is very much NOT destroying them. The sales is what counts in the end. But it is a fantastic aircraft.

    • @grammarboy1318
      @grammarboy1318 Год назад +5

      “Destroying” is a favourite word for clickbait titles. Very little is ever destroyed.

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 Год назад +1

      Compare how much money the A350 has actually made in profit compared to the 787. Boeing have spent more money on the 787 program than Airbus did on the A380 and still not made a profit. The A350 broke even back in 2019.

  • @Nightwing22k
    @Nightwing22k Год назад +18

    No. The a350 is not the first aircraft to use composite materials. That title goes to the 787.

    • @tentruesummers9043
      @tentruesummers9043 Год назад +4

      I'm no expert, but is there a difference between composite materials (B787) and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers (A350) ?

    • @fabriziob5846
      @fabriziob5846 Год назад

      How about the A380 then? It was launched before the 787...

    • @Nightwing22k
      @Nightwing22k Год назад +3

      @@tentruesummers9043 me neither but I am positive that the 787 was the first to do so based on a documentary i saw years ago. Carbon fiber is a major material for building the wings of the dreamliner.

    • @migrocha
      @migrocha Год назад +6

      He didn't say that, he said it's the first composite Airbus.

    • @kerrianblot7739
      @kerrianblot7739 Год назад

      The first to use a composite body (more than 50%)

  • @gianlucacavagnoli3207
    @gianlucacavagnoli3207 Год назад +14

    I'm a huge Boeing fan, been flying long-hauls for long time with both Boeing (777/747/787) and Airbus (330-330neo/350/380). Both 787 and 350 are awesome but A350 is slightly better overall. Great airplanes both though. Anyway, will the 777X be operational some day in the future ? I lost track of that

    • @JPB57
      @JPB57 Год назад +2

      How can you say that the A350 is better than the B787? What are your arguments for that?

    • @gianlucacavagnoli3207
      @gianlucacavagnoli3207 Год назад

      @@JPB57 been flying both aircrafts on long haul routes. That's my thinking. Few little things are better on the A350. That's it. And I tell you, I always love Boeing aircrafts. 777 is still a wonderful airplane. Just saying

    • @JPB57
      @JPB57 Год назад

      @@gianlucacavagnoli3207 Did you Fly as passenger?

    • @gianlucacavagnoli3207
      @gianlucacavagnoli3207 Год назад

      @@JPB57 yes of course. Flying business class on long hauls

    • @JPB57
      @JPB57 Год назад

      @@gianlucacavagnoli3207 ok, I understand, just a feeling, no technical argument

  • @twodimensionsjhr
    @twodimensionsjhr Год назад +6

    I get to fly A350-900 later this year!

    • @DrakeDHDerr
      @DrakeDHDerr Год назад

      You won’t regret it. It’s cabin is the quietest

  • @darrenmcwilliams8205
    @darrenmcwilliams8205 Год назад +11

    Showing virgin 787 😬

  • @williamcortes1552
    @williamcortes1552 Год назад +12

    The a350 is a beautiful airplane. 787 dreamliner is just as nice.

    • @NikonF5user
      @NikonF5user Год назад +4

      Not nearly. And those windows on the 787 are horrible. Passengers lose control and the ability to look down at the whim of flight attendants...

    • @williamcortes1552
      @williamcortes1552 Год назад +1

      My observation is from the outside. I never have have flown on either one. The a350 has a distinct windshield that's rounded along with rounded winglets. It's my favorite aircraft right now. The 787 has it's wings in the most highest angle than any other. Short nose and engines have Saber tooth design post engine. Looks nice.

    • @jesperdevries936
      @jesperdevries936 Год назад

      @@williamcortes1552 boeing 787 dreamliner is good.
      but Airbus is just superior
      specialy when we look at the prices airbus is way more expensice but still has 100% more orders

    • @JPB57
      @JPB57 Год назад +1

      @@jesperdevries936 You say: Airbus is better: give technical arguments

  • @midknight1978
    @midknight1978 Год назад

    Proud to be flying such a beast!

  • @goaboi
    @goaboi Год назад +1

    amazing video

  • @Greatdome99
    @Greatdome99 Год назад +2

    I think this is an Airbus ad in disguise.

  • @wadehiggins1114
    @wadehiggins1114 Год назад +2

    Airbus is number one!

  • @robertarmstrong4040
    @robertarmstrong4040 Год назад +4

    Find any polyps up there, Mr. Airbus!!!!

  • @eduardodaquiljr9637
    @eduardodaquiljr9637 Год назад +1

    No airplane manufacturers competing with A350,787 is launnched ahead of a350,777-9 is far ahead of other airplanes in technology.

    • @odzergaming
      @odzergaming 4 месяца назад

      787 sears are narrow af (16 vs 18 inches on A350)

  • @pieterleroux8125
    @pieterleroux8125 11 месяцев назад +1

    Beautiful aircraft A350 ( 900 and ,1000 )

  • @raflyadelia7610
    @raflyadelia7610 Год назад +7

    A320 will get new composite wing also

    • @peterkotara
      @peterkotara Год назад +2

      Says who?

    • @stefanweilhartner4415
      @stefanweilhartner4415 Год назад +1

      @@peterkotara good question. but probably a logical step to keep the middle of the market plane up2date.

    • @ACPilot
      @ACPilot Год назад

      Nope..

    • @peterkotara
      @peterkotara Год назад

      @Roger since my last post I have realised that Airbus are indeed "looking into" it, but nothing has been firmed up. In truth, I don't see them doing anything until Boeing forces their hand. So don't hold your breath.

  • @eduardodaquiljr9637
    @eduardodaquiljr9637 Год назад +5

    787 is more fuel efficient than e350

    • @altoclef6688
      @altoclef6688 Год назад

      Boeing and Airbus were clever enough to optimise their aircraft differently. So it really depends on the mission. How much load can you expect, and what distance will you fly.
      If one of them always was more efficient, the other would have zero orders.

    • @klausschumacher7126
      @klausschumacher7126 Год назад +1

      And the 787 has also forgotten tools in the plane..... maybe it will be found and used one day....

  • @bigdogboos1
    @bigdogboos1 Год назад

    this plane is sick

  • @b127_1
    @b127_1 Год назад +3

    I'm sorry but a380 is not suddenly a desirable aircraft. There are still plenty in storage and some will even be scrapped in the next few years.

    • @user-oj4xp2lh4d
      @user-oj4xp2lh4d Год назад +1

      Great shame because comfort wise it beats the others hands down.

  • @airplane_guy396
    @airplane_guy396 Год назад

    The A350 is the best aircraft I. have ever flown , the only thing is the engine somehow is louder than the 787

  • @boondockduane
    @boondockduane Год назад

    I believe the 787 is destroying a350 sales at this point
    Airbus a350 variants 948
    Boeing 787 variants 1608

  • @shinigamichopper
    @shinigamichopper Год назад +2

    Airbus is so much cooler than Boeing

  • @cesaralexis73
    @cesaralexis73 Год назад +1

    They just need a better painter 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @deesolomon1957
    @deesolomon1957 Год назад

    What goes up comes down.

  • @davidk6264
    @davidk6264 Год назад +2

    they can control drones from the other side of the world but if people are on a plane, it makes it impossible somehow. If an MH370 situation happened again, nothing would change.

    • @C783H
      @C783H Год назад

      They crash more often than your told. Also autopilots drop out a lot.

    • @CaptainKremmen
      @CaptainKremmen Год назад

      Not impossible, just a truly terrible idea. Hackers could take over planes and hold them for ransom. Or governments could abduct a plane by remote control just to grab political opponents on board. This is thousands of times more likely than a rogue pilot.

  • @anthonywatts2033
    @anthonywatts2033 Год назад +4

    grateful for the update, but i have sever reservations with this video and another you tube video purveyor in the frield of aeronautics that sees to push Boeing product. Frankly if I wanted promotional videos I'd go to the manufacturers. As I am not, I am looking for at least an attempt at balance.

    • @florencioigual
      @florencioigual Год назад

      A video that claims the American product is not the best must be biased, right?

  • @sjv9147s
    @sjv9147s Год назад +1

    I would rather fly a Comac C919 anytime over the 737 for peace of mind.

    • @Samguy55
      @Samguy55 Год назад

      😂 what a poor mindset

    • @sjv9147s
      @sjv9147s Год назад

      @@Samguy55 Never crashed before. Will live longer than the rich mindsets.

    • @JDAbelRN
      @JDAbelRN Год назад

      Go to China, only place they will ever fly😂

    • @sjv9147s
      @sjv9147s Год назад

      Of course no COMAC's ever crashed before.

    • @sjv9147s
      @sjv9147s Год назад

      @@JDAbelRN General Electric ordered 20 C919s, FYI.

  • @georgecabrelestan3620
    @georgecabrelestan3620 Год назад +2

    Unbeatable the triple 7🤗🤗🤗

    • @gianlucacavagnoli3207
      @gianlucacavagnoli3207 Год назад

      still a heck of plane

    • @user-oj4xp2lh4d
      @user-oj4xp2lh4d Год назад +2

      If you enjoy the most uncomfortable, squashed together seating experience. Most airlines seat 10 across when the airframe was made for 9 across. Air France/KLM is a good example of this.

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 Год назад

      The 777 is the airlines most popular choice because it's a loud, cramped aircraft where they can press in most passengers. If you want to fly more comfortable as a passenger you rather choose a different aircraft

    • @DrakeDHDerr
      @DrakeDHDerr Год назад

      @@simonm1447 ​ that’s why Airbus officially announced recently that the a350 will use a 10 seat configuration lol and a lot of people are mad about that

    • @DrakeDHDerr
      @DrakeDHDerr Год назад

      @@simonm1447 also, I flew the 777 300er and a350 900 on a same day and they both had 9 seat configuration. My point is that the number of seats per row comes down to the airliner itself and what they want. They could choose to offer 10 abreast for the a350, which we see today in some airlines so what are u saying aussie

  • @nevermore.327
    @nevermore.327 Год назад

    The raccoon is thriving in the aviation industry

  • @yohanmaduranga
    @yohanmaduranga Год назад +2

    And Boeing 777x delays

  • @donaldbenedictus7259
    @donaldbenedictus7259 Год назад

    Airbus especialy A350 is "dangerous" for Boeing act as competitor.

  • @blessingkone8142
    @blessingkone8142 Год назад

    Ai France loves the air bus a350

    • @JDAbelRN
      @JDAbelRN Год назад

      Well shit, the frogs make the damn planes, what you expect, eurotrash

  • @HayMaker-tv2dm
    @HayMaker-tv2dm 5 месяцев назад

    And the new and continiuos problems with Boeing in their product quality, like pieces of the plain falling from the sky and bolts mais missing and huge quality problems in their materials, Airbus is the most innovetive company in aviation and they just need to be bold again and design something never seen in the sky

  • @ACPilot
    @ACPilot Год назад

    The flying baguette, both the 787 and 777X are nicer..

    • @HellStr82
      @HellStr82 Год назад

      Nicer does not mean better mate

    • @ACPilot
      @ACPilot Год назад

      @@HellStr82 In some ways, yes they are better ;-) The 787 has the best cockpit of any, the 777X is the largest of them all. The A350 isn’t neither.

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 Год назад

      The 777X isn't even certified yet and it transported not a single passenger yet. How can you know it's nicer?

    • @ACPilot
      @ACPilot Год назад

      @@simonm1447 It is an updated 777, we know all the updates and how it will look like. It is being updated to become dreamliner-like..

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 Год назад

      @@ACPilot Do you judge an aircraft just after the look? Personally I judge them after comfort, this is what makes an aircraft good for passengers, and here is the 777-300ER inferior to the 350 and the 380, which offer better seats and a far quieter cabin in comparison

  • @johnnguyen1692
    @johnnguyen1692 Год назад +1

    like airbus because aircraft camera on their planes!!!!

  • @unieast9581
    @unieast9581 Год назад +3

    Hello Mr. Airbus spokesman.
    Is all against BOENG?

    • @maxsaviation9512
      @maxsaviation9512 Год назад +4

      There are plenty of Mr. Boeing spokesman 🤦‍♂️

    • @florencioigual
      @florencioigual Год назад +2

      BOENG!! 😂 That's the sound of a 737 max crashing?! 🤣

    • @HellStr82
      @HellStr82 Год назад

      Is Boeing still killing people ?

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад

      say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

  • @0xNameless
    @0xNameless Год назад

    Watch pilots lose jobs now with Dragonfly v2...

  • @Whatreally123
    @Whatreally123 10 месяцев назад +1

    After the 737 max issues and the reports of dangerous cost cutting measures at boeing, i try to book airbus flights always.

  • @arnaudgerard1971
    @arnaudgerard1971 Год назад

    Flying drones. Have fun. :p :)

  • @pentameteriamb6196
    @pentameteriamb6196 Год назад +1

    According to the latest news
    from Reuters and the huge, just in, latest order from Air Riyhad I'd say you're video is just a little bit out-of-touch with the times. The BOEING 787 is T O T A L L Y
    crushing the a350, whatever competition to an almost 1.7956 to one sales ratio. I hate FALSE news with misleading information just to make one side look better.... GO BOEING! Wait till the 787-9 and 10 "ER" release. Interesting video though. :-)

    • @CaptainKremmen
      @CaptainKremmen Год назад

      Your stat is also misleading. The 787 has been in production for 3 years longer. A fairer comparison would be the number being sold each year. That still puts the 787 ahead, but not by so much.

    • @pentameteriamb6196
      @pentameteriamb6196 Год назад

      @@CaptainKremmen Dear Mr. CAPTAIN... Of course I took the yearly average! DUH!!

    • @CaptainKremmen
      @CaptainKremmen Год назад

      @@pentameteriamb6196 You didn't, or your figures are simply wrong.

    • @pentameteriamb6196
      @pentameteriamb6196 Год назад

      @@CaptainKremmen Why not show YOUR figures and then we can talk about it.

    • @CaptainKremmen
      @CaptainKremmen Год назад +1

      @@pentameteriamb6196 787 deliveries (12 years to 2022) 1037. A350 deliveries (9 years to 2022) 521. 86.4 per year vs 57.9 per year = 1.49x. Remaining orders 574 vs 424 = 1.35x. (wikipedia)

  • @Dan.d649
    @Dan.d649 Год назад +9

    It seems like you have ties with Airbus, or work for them. Call it out how you want to, but you must know that there is absolutely no competition here between manufacturers. One airplane is not better then the other (787 or A350) they both are satisfying in the fleets worldwide in which they operate. The commonality between the two is the same, they both are amazing in their own ways. There is no other way to put it. They just are two airplanes that are the same in comparison.

    • @Dan.d649
      @Dan.d649 Год назад

      ​@Roger Why argue? The 787 is a superior airplane like the A350. You just can't take down a company with one type of airplane. I don't really care for other Airbus planes. It's just my own opinion. That's all I really need to say.

    • @Dan.d649
      @Dan.d649 Год назад

      @Roger Well, the producer of this video, like yourself, have ties with Airbus, and that's not a fair deal to other people who view this. I am knowledgeable about airplanes, and I speak my own word.

    • @odzergaming
      @odzergaming 4 месяца назад

      ​@@Dan.d649how tf do people survive 10h on 787 with its 16 inch seats

  • @HayMaker-tv2dm
    @HayMaker-tv2dm 5 месяцев назад

    Boeing is blind they should make joint venture in defence with MBDA from Europe but i think the smarter Northrop Grumman already have been making great deals with Airbus and MBDA that is smart from NG i think they will even enter in the European FCAS, amazing

  • @tuanpham-vv3qj
    @tuanpham-vv3qj 2 месяца назад

    Are you having an engineering degree in 1960? You don't know that Boeing is also using CFK much earlier than Airbus!

  • @iunknown2947
    @iunknown2947 6 месяцев назад

    You made clickbait with the Dangerous word...right?

  • @meyertomnet
    @meyertomnet 11 месяцев назад +1

    Boeing getting dumped by Airbus

  • @kavehvahedipour2089
    @kavehvahedipour2089 Год назад +1

    LOL, this dude is such an Airbus fan boy. It's so It's so obvious when you listen to the exaggerated wording. I have no idea if he's not totally right, but he's such a fan boy.

  • @patrickpowers5995
    @patrickpowers5995 Год назад +2

    Goodbye Boeing....

  • @FairladyS130
    @FairladyS130 Год назад

    Boeing will be government supported by the US government with contracts which in effect will be subsidies, it's too big for the US to allow to fail.

    • @JDAbelRN
      @JDAbelRN Год назад

      Of course, Boeing is protecting Europe and rest of free world with defense aircraft, missiles, etc. What has Airbus and Europe done lately to protect free world? Boeing is essential for defense of free world.

  • @markusdecimus4732
    @markusdecimus4732 Год назад

    He has no competitors.

  • @winwinniewinfield
    @winwinniewinfield Год назад

    destroying or dangerous some crazy wording lol Anyway the 777 isn’t that old some are many aren’t no need to replace it . This is clearly a airbus fanboy page.. 😂😂. It comes down to sales check them Out and you’ll see your destroying facts …. An I don’t pick any sides end of the day it is the carrier an most cram too many seats on their AC an tix are overpriced so yea … Like I love JetBlue ( all airbus ) an delta ( mix ) newer AC an good service Long as I’m not on a crj or a turboprop I’m happy

  • @r107560sl
    @r107560sl Год назад

    Carbon fiber is overrated!

  • @etunimisukunimi7747
    @etunimisukunimi7747 Год назад

    Quite long advertisement.

  • @A.S379
    @A.S379 6 месяцев назад

    737 and it's variants need to be retired. There is no point trying to improve an obsolete 60' design.

  • @peterkotara
    @peterkotara Год назад +6

    Welcome to the new world of alternative facts.

    • @maxsaviation9512
      @maxsaviation9512 Год назад +1

      A350 is better than the 777

    • @peterkotara
      @peterkotara Год назад

      @@maxsaviation9512 And its simply destroying its competition. I know this to be true because some incel on you tube said so.

    • @nishant54
      @nishant54 Год назад

      ​@@peterkotaraWho knows more than you ever could too.

    • @peterkotara
      @peterkotara Год назад +1

      ​@@nishant54 I couldn't begin to tell you how many people know more than me about too many subjects to mention.
      However, I'm not in the habit of making grandiose statements as fact without supporting evidence (Like the title of this video and max's comment).
      My OP was intended to express my dismay at the state of what passes for journalism today.

    • @florencioigual
      @florencioigual Год назад

      Welcome to the old world of lack of arguments

  • @teekenduarya3614
    @teekenduarya3614 Год назад +2

    Air india historical order video please

  • @meraboy8322
    @meraboy8322 Год назад

    *Avoid 737 Max & 787 by all means*

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад +1

      say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

  • @WinWindowS.K.Julian
    @WinWindowS.K.Julian Год назад

    Is this Video AI generated?

    • @untoldaviation
      @untoldaviation  Год назад +1

      nope

    • @WinWindowS.K.Julian
      @WinWindowS.K.Julian Год назад +2

      @@untoldaviation Then how do you explain the following:
      0:20 "when the carbon fibre and *plastic* (should be epoxy resin) get combined it makes the material much stronger than *other metals* (crp /cfc is not metal)"
      or
      "this material is more resistant to corrosion, reducing the net fuel burn..." what does corrosion have to do with fuelburn?
      Also the voice sounds very generic and has little to no change in tone (which a human voice would). There are a bunch of instance of this throughout the video along with other signs of ai generation.

    • @LuizAlexPhoenix
      @LuizAlexPhoenix Год назад +4

      ​@@WinWindowS.K.JulianJust sounds like random person reading parts off a script and joining them all up in post.

    • @WinWindowS.K.Julian
      @WinWindowS.K.Julian Год назад

      @@LuizAlexPhoenix which Trends to be a sign that a Video is AI generated... Togeter with tts voice

    • @felipegiraldo3401
      @felipegiraldo3401 Год назад

      ​@@WinWindowS.K.Julian The part of the corrosion and fuel savings is due to the material, meaning, it's lighter therefore can reduce fuel consumption and is less corrosive than the material used before.

  • @jimmunro4649
    @jimmunro4649 Год назад

    Better because not BOEING

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад

      say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

  • @truth2hurts
    @truth2hurts Год назад

    say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

  • @Gio-ue8ps
    @Gio-ue8ps 9 месяцев назад

    This video is old. It was 6 months ago. Boeing has already resolved all of its problems. The 737 max got approved for delivery in China. Also, many large orders for Boeing since since this video

  • @crselkerii
    @crselkerii Год назад +4

    Yeah right. Ask Quatar about it's issues. Of course enough money seemingly made the problem go away. I have flown on numerous A220s and not happy at all.

    • @rannnn5498
      @rannnn5498 Год назад +1

      shut up

    • @crselkerii
      @crselkerii Год назад

      Airbus bought the product line, that makes it Airbus. Still not happy with them.

    • @rannnn5498
      @rannnn5498 Год назад +1

      @Pa. D yes

    • @rannnn5498
      @rannnn5498 Год назад +3

      @@crselkerii and you’re hally with boeing where airplanes fall out of the sky because boeings too lazy to tell their pilots about an MCAS system.It’s the not the a220,it may also be the airline and THEIR choice of cabins

    • @rajnylguzman8623
      @rajnylguzman8623 Год назад +4

      you mean the qatar issues that have been resolved? and numerous a220s that are owned and operated by airlines based on their preferences?

  • @mugilv
    @mugilv Год назад

    it is aluminium😡

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 Год назад

      A350 has more carbon fibre than 787 ratio wise

  • @LeZturbo
    @LeZturbo Год назад +2

    Enhance A380….. dead…. Is this an Airbus commercial ? A350 is small compare to the future 777-900 and 1000

    • @florencioigual
      @florencioigual Год назад +1

      When you speak about FUTURE Boeing aircraft, you better be patient

    • @bmitchell928
      @bmitchell928 Год назад

      Americans think they have best pilots in the world ,they made a cock up blaming third world pilots for Boeing building a death trap

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад

      say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

  • @SS13934
    @SS13934 Год назад +10

    Boeing went Woke and now is broke, lost their way and reputation. Airbus the best!!

    • @MegaBISP
      @MegaBISP Год назад +8

      Huh?

    • @mijnordna
      @mijnordna Год назад +5

      I don’t think that Boeing's problems have anything to do with their 'wokeness'. What a stupid comment.

    • @nishant54
      @nishant54 Год назад

      ​@@mijnordnaAbsolutely there is fool. Every company thatgoes woke gets broke because there are quiet majority who talks with their money.

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад

      say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

  • @jiwang28
    @jiwang28 Год назад

    American channel always talk bad about airbus. they just cannot accept boeing always make rubbish plane..

    • @truth2hurts
      @truth2hurts Год назад

      say no to boeing, the greedy company that makes flying coffins

  • @SirEdmundBlack
    @SirEdmundBlack Год назад

    For credibility you need to do better research before putting the video up. Don't get me wrong, I feel safe on an Airbus, never feel safe on a Boeing because of their profit before human lives culture. And yes some Airbus now are more efficient and even have longer range than the competitors but that is mainly because of the mishaps of Boeing (self inflicted).
    If you want do be credible, try not to be sensational.

  • @donpierce4829
    @donpierce4829 10 месяцев назад

    Airbus better enjoy it well it can Boeing will make a big comeback in 2024 and they will be hard to stop. The 777 X will be certified and there will be a lot of orders!! The 787 derivatives will be the most popular aircraft!!!

    • @allxpxpxpCo
      @allxpxpxpCo 9 месяцев назад

      Hhhhhhhhhh 777x 2024 now 2030

  • @markhancock6694
    @markhancock6694 Год назад

    Airbus has exceptional qualities?? Seriously?? You've obviously never flown on an Airbust.

    • @HellStr82
      @HellStr82 Год назад +1

      Go fly on a 737 MAX

    • @markhancock6694
      @markhancock6694 Год назад +1

      @@HellStr82 The 737 is a great aircraft. The 2 Max crashes were deemed more pilot error as they fought a computer that was a little too precise. The computers were "toned down" and pilots were retrained. No shakes and rattles in a Boeing. The Airbuses are failing apart. The A380 is in maintenance more than in the air! The A350 is supposed to be the company's saviour. Good luck

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 Год назад +1

      @@markhancock6694 Oh it was more pilot error? So why did the aircraft spend nearly 2 years stuck on the ground? Was that just for pilot training? Or so it could undergo a major modification program so it wouldn't kill anyone else but then more flaws were found and had to be fixed?