Here is a little time saver. Things that help you learn 1. minimizing distractions/ maximizing focus 2. develop accurate metacognition 3. deep appropriate processing of concepts 4. practicing retrieval and application
This is actually very helpful, crazy because I was the shallow type of learner but ever since covid and learning remotely I’ve been teaching myself how to use deep processing.
The fact that the control group got similar results to the 'deep processing' group surely displays that the best way to learn is what you did naturally... All it really showed in the results is that people have no attachment to the letter e
At 4:13 he talks about deep processing, and that makes me think of something I always teach in my seminars: Adults learn why they know they have to make a practical application of the material in the very near future. When I ask my participants when they will use the information I am teaching, it creates greater participation and they put the cell phones away. It creates a sense of urgency.
I am a secondary school student and I find this video extremely useful :) thank you so much for uploading and creating this :) I will recommend this to all my friends.
I chose 3 because i use various methods in my learning such as association, mind mapping, order of importance and a few other things but i highly considered 5 because the way you interpret what your about to do basically oversees everything. I chose my desirable answer and let emotions get in the way of the rational. :) either way I love these videos. It is much different from all of the accelerated learning courses I have ever taken.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:05 📚 Understanding how people learn is essential for effective studying. 02:54 🧠 Deep processing, thinking meaningfully about material, is crucial for effective learning. 05:39 🚫 Learning styles like visual or auditory are not supported by research; focus on deep processing instead. 06:08 ⏳ Committing time alone is not enough; deep processing and meaningful connections are key to successful learning. 06:37 🤔 Desire to learn and attention are important, but deep processing is crucial for academic success. Made with HARPA AI
@ccdoss Good point. What is shown here is only a portion of the Hyde & Jenkins studies. They also found that deep processing led to semantic associations among words, so it wasn't just rote memorization. Later studies confirmed that deep processing is a key element of comprehension of prose.
I think they were just trying to say that allowing people to use their "favorite way of learning" (which could in fact be deep processing) is no better than using a defined method of deep processing.
I pick 5 what I think about while studying .well i think about everything mind everywhere i know that's not good working on it. All these vides are very helpful will be seeing more on my way to getting better help .it what time u put in what u want and that will help u in ever day life
After watching the video, I realized I used more of a shallow processing focus on the last exam instead of trying to make meaningful connections to new material using a deep processing focus.
I think we like to use different types of studying strategies based on our perception of pressure around us. If an expectation is received, regardless if the expectation was given, then the pressure to satisfy that expectation occurs and distracts him/her during the process of trying to focus and study.
... So, the control group, which were asked to just memorize the words, scored just as high as the "deep" learners... which means that the control proved that deep processing literally had no effect on the processing ability. the control only proves that the "E" test actually gave out lower results, most likely because students ASSUMED that they would have to recall the words (if you are given a random list of words from researchers, of course it's not rocket science to assume these words are important and need to be remembered) and since they made that assumption, BOTH incidental and intentional learners were TAKEN BY SURPRISE by an odd test. This is badly designed.
Not exactly. The Deep-level processing (understanding meaning) individuals read the list and memorized it just as well as a group who were TRYING to remember every word. This memory creation worked whether the students knew they would be tested later nor not, so it is incorrect to say they were in a "deep learning" condition. This suggests that for reading material (an important skill in college), you should read to attempt to understand. This will create learning as a by-product of the reading process and is thus preferable to just "studying" (or just memorizing). Your second hypothesis is in itself an assumption (you assume the intent of sudy participants) and there is no evidence for it in this study. There are many, many follow-up studies in this line of research (remember, this study was done in 1969). We know a great deal more today about deep-level processing in the brain. Take this study in context as one step in the process of understanding how our brain works.
Oh this video is great I am a maths teacher for students resitting their GCSE maths exams. It is clear for me that many of the students follow blind instructions without asking themselves simple questions such as what do I need to remember or how this is related to other topics. I have to invest alot of time planning "orienting" tasks to steer their thinking. Sometimes I am successful and sometimes I am not.
On sprit Semester I'm taking math 120 witch is Stats and I'm doing kind of well, but some of the assignment are kind of tricky cause I follow what it say on the hint but some of the answers I was getting wrong and I try again and I still get the answer wrong. But some of the Assignments I did good and on my first exam I pass it by 71 and I know was poorly cause it was just like Vocabulary and I did my best on the first Exam.
In other words... (some research suggest) The best way to learn something is to "care" about the subject and relate details to your previous knowledge. Convoluted & "important sounding" explanation based on tentative/non-supported evidence. Lacks the study/s of the source of his claim or any compelling theory as to why it would (always) be "the best" way to absorb new information (as implied). Under-evaluated authority based opinion that needs more testing before stated as a fact.
How would I use deep processing if I'm bored out of my mind? Desire to learn seems to be more important because you automaticallly try to get the most out of your learning
Exactly, that's what I was thinking. The experiment is such an artificial learning task, the word 'intention' here cannot be conflated with being super interested in recalling words. I would like to see an experiment that uses a real project like learning an instrument or a language, something that is meaningful.
"There is simply no good evidence that learning styles matter"...I love that. I would love to drop that bombshell on my fruity Elementary Education professors. Think I'll keep it to myself though as they may flunk me out of school.
Except, you know, the research about learning styles associated to neurodivergent or non-neurotypical individuals like autistics and other groups. I'm actually a little p'd off that this guy doesn't understand that these individuals and the research on that COUNTS towards "evidence" that learning styles matter. (No aggression meant towards you)
Well is recollection of a list of words one afternoon indicate 'learning'? Maybe they should ask about the list of words the next day, or in a week. Is that considered a different type of learning? Maybe presenting a new concept or technique and having them summon it from thier memory would be better. And making claims based on one study (probably done with a bunch of undergrad students) is helpful in finding truth but I think further research is needed to validate the findings. I'm skeptical about how the findings of the study are presented, I'd like to see results from other studies also.
3 & 5 need to be compared & contrasted. Only differences i see is level of evidence. A few words on the topic of 3. Learning style is based on the person, you cant teach someone a learning style, they need to know and understand all the techniques of learning as well as the 101 of the learning brain before they can actually develop (i like to use the word schedule) their ordered tasks of learning. A learning style is just a preference of techniques that flow well in order with the person.
yeah, i was pretty bummed out when he said Motivation's not needed to study, but i guess he's kinda right since even if you have a motivation to study and you used a Shallow way of studying, then it's not really effective for studying. Also, most people tries to find motivation, waiting for it to come... like me, I'm always unmotivated, I wanted to be motivated, and when it comes, it only lasts for a while and then it's gone..i guess he's just saying that u dnt need motivation to study
+eddie As an engineering student as well, I find it easier to recall concepts/formulas if you understand and can derive the formula, or can explain the concept using fundamental theories/laws. Being able to derive formulas or explain concepts through fundamental sub-concepts are examples of the deeper level of processing .
+BADDBrad52 can you give an example for like a concept/formula for what ever subject. do explain it to some one in a simplified way? Not sure if you know about scott young and his tactics
ok we understand that deep processing is the best way to understand and recall material BUT tell us how we can process information at a deep level give us practical ideas..
You know, it's funny, I picked the incorrect answer and you said those who picked the correct one are _on the right path to successful study_. Well, isn't everyone there now after the topic has been explained regardless of the choice they made prior to the explanation ? ;)
So "Paying close attention to the material as I study" isn't more important than "What I think about while I study?" I'm sorry, I didn't realize that those weren't basically the same thing. So... I am on the wrong path for staying on task and paying attention to the material.
One thing that doesn't make sense to me. They all had an intent to learn otherwise they wouldn't have participated, they just didn't have an intent to complete a test, which didn't make much of a difference whether or not they knew they were being tested or not. That would depend on the population being tested as well as what the incentive is to score high on the test "The Reward". He kept saying "Intent to learn made no difference". Unless the incidental groups were not told which level of processing to perform and simply did it on their own? I don't think that's what happened.
Fun Fact: you're watching this for homework
Here is a little time saver.
Things that help you learn
1. minimizing distractions/ maximizing focus
2. develop accurate metacognition
3. deep appropriate processing of concepts
4. practicing retrieval and application
I love you🎉
SHUT THE FUUUCK UPPP, ITS 10 AT NIGHT
Thx so much
Thanks fellow human being. I love you. Good night.
You’re amazing
i should be studying for an exam, but i think this is more important
rsrsrsrsrsr kkkk
same
bro these are shit
Brooooo 😂😂
This is actually very helpful, crazy because I was the shallow type of learner but ever since covid and learning remotely I’ve been teaching myself how to use deep processing.
Key points=Deep processing, minimise distractionss and maximise focus......
First tell me how can i focus on this video...
Asking the real questions here.
@@karmakun7126 facts i lost focus at least 4 times already
RIGHT!
this comment is so real
The fact that the control group got similar results to the 'deep processing' group surely displays that the best way to learn is what you did naturally... All it really showed in the results is that people have no attachment to the letter e
At 4:13 he talks about deep processing, and that makes me think of something I always teach in my seminars: Adults learn why they know they have to make a practical application of the material in the very near future. When I ask my participants when they will use the information I am teaching, it creates greater participation and they put the cell phones away. It creates a sense of urgency.
MichelleMotivateMe
I am a secondary school student and I find this video extremely useful :) thank you so much for uploading and creating this :) I will recommend this to all my friends.
The study that was conducted about memorizing the words was very interesting!
I chose 3 because i use various methods in my learning such as association, mind mapping, order of importance and a few other things but i highly considered 5 because the way you interpret what your about to do basically oversees everything. I chose my desirable answer and let emotions get in the way of the rational. :) either way I love these videos. It is much different from all of the accelerated learning courses I have ever taken.
If you pay attention, the answer actually flashes briefly at 0:44.
+Unda ground I thought i was the only one who noticed that
I saw that! I thought it was my eyes.
Thanks
This is such useful information. I wish I had known this when I was younger. I will pass this on to all I know.
the best explanation i ever get of the best way to study. thanks prof!
Thank you Dr chew for sharing video, The video was so helpful and I enjoyed that
Thanks Dr. Chew, I am glad to learn about this useful recommendations.
First like
Good tip on how to learn. The depths of processing are most important. Thank you.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:05 📚 Understanding how people learn is essential for effective studying.
02:54 🧠 Deep processing, thinking meaningfully about material, is crucial for effective learning.
05:39 🚫 Learning styles like visual or auditory are not supported by research; focus on deep processing instead.
06:08 ⏳ Committing time alone is not enough; deep processing and meaningful connections are key to successful learning.
06:37 🤔 Desire to learn and attention are important, but deep processing is crucial for academic success.
Made with HARPA AI
Fantastic! The best video i've come across so far in terms of study :)
@ccdoss Good point. What is shown here is only a portion of the Hyde & Jenkins studies. They also found that deep processing led to semantic associations among words, so it wasn't just rote memorization. Later studies confirmed that deep processing is a key element of comprehension of prose.
Okay hold up. If the control group scored nearly as much as the deep thinking, should they have monitored the control group a little more?
I think they were just trying to say that allowing people to use their "favorite way of learning" (which could in fact be deep processing) is no better than using a defined method of deep processing.
oh man this series is awesome.
I get his point, but option 5 wasn't phrased well
Uh , yeah I think about studying?
Dude doesn't explain how control group scored so well???
The intent to learn should have more of an impact when learners must make choices about how they will engage with the material.
I pick 5 what I think about while studying .well i think about everything mind everywhere i know that's not good working on it. All these vides are very helpful will be seeing more on my way to getting better help .it what time u put in what u want and that will help u in ever day life
thanks dr , I find this is very helpfull ..
I wish I saw these videos growing up, going through school. These would've helped so much.
I've been learning by intentional pleasantness all my life and I just realised omg
Very insightful.
After watching the video, I realized I used more of a shallow processing focus on the last exam instead of trying to make meaningful connections to new material using a deep processing focus.
thank you for such very useful video....:)
Way better and helpful tgan todays "how to study effectively" videos
Well, the most you can say is that an exam tests how well you can recall what you're supposed to have learned with minimal queues.
very usefull information!! thanx for this video - i will recommend ittto my students!
it's interesting that the control group does equally good as those in deep processing groups. Why?
justice47256 magic
I think we like to use different types of studying strategies based on our perception of pressure around us. If an expectation is received, regardless if the expectation was given, then the pressure to satisfy that expectation occurs and distracts him/her during the process of trying to focus and study.
... So, the control group, which were asked to just memorize the words, scored just as high as the "deep" learners... which means that the control proved that deep processing literally had no effect on the processing ability. the control only proves that the "E" test actually gave out lower results, most likely because students ASSUMED that they would have to recall the words (if you are given a random list of words from researchers, of course it's not rocket science to assume these words are important and need to be remembered) and since they made that assumption, BOTH incidental and intentional learners were TAKEN BY SURPRISE by an odd test. This is badly designed.
Not exactly. The Deep-level processing (understanding meaning) individuals read the list and memorized it just as well as a group who were TRYING to remember every word. This memory creation worked whether the students knew they would be tested later nor not, so it is incorrect to say they were in a "deep learning" condition. This suggests that for reading material (an important skill in college), you should read to attempt to understand. This will create learning as a by-product of the reading process and is thus preferable to just "studying" (or just memorizing). Your second hypothesis is in itself an assumption (you assume the intent of sudy participants) and there is no evidence for it in this study. There are many, many follow-up studies in this line of research (remember, this study was done in 1969). We know a great deal more today about deep-level processing in the brain. Take this study in context as one step in the process of understanding how our brain works.
The same goes for what you are thinking while you are speaking. And now 'intention' means something else altogether.
Thank you
the control group just as good..........so it does not matter which method you use.
hey thanks for the video!
Oh this video is great I am a maths teacher for students resitting their GCSE maths exams. It is clear for me that many of the students follow blind instructions without asking themselves simple questions such as what do I need to remember or how this is related to other topics. I have to invest alot of time planning "orienting" tasks to steer their thinking. Sometimes I am successful and sometimes I am not.
If you think about meaningful connections, you're using deep processing, you learn whether you intend to or not
This really helped me!! Thanks so much!
What does it mean to "make connections" while learning? Could someone please give me an example? :)
nice vids... need this..
On sprit Semester I'm taking math 120 witch is Stats and I'm doing kind of well, but some of the assignment are kind of tricky cause I follow what it say on the hint but some of the answers I was getting wrong and I try again and I still get the answer wrong. But some of the Assignments I did good and on my first exam I pass it by 71 and I know was poorly cause it was just like Vocabulary and I did my best on the first Exam.
that shirt is sick af
@ccdoss ... studying doesnt test anything. Tests test things. Examining how well you can memorize something IS examining how much you've learned....
In other words... (some research suggest) The best way to learn something is to "care" about the subject and relate details to your previous knowledge.
Convoluted & "important sounding" explanation based on tentative/non-supported evidence. Lacks the study/s of the source of his claim or any compelling theory as to why it would (always) be "the best" way to absorb new information (as implied).
Under-evaluated authority based opinion that needs more testing before stated as a fact.
Easy: having the intention and desire to focus on it
I don't get this, man.
So, even if I wanted to learn, like actually learn and apply this stuff, it still wouldn't work?
How do I apply this stuff?
I got it right! I picked #5. I swear. I paid attention to watch he said. :P
What Sudents?
well, i picked option 5 but then - i'm a educational psychologist so i knew it anyways.
Dr Chew, fantastic videos, professor. A pleasure to watch.
How does all this change for people with ADHD? People who can't focus well?
How would I use deep processing if I'm bored out of my mind? Desire to learn seems to be more important because you automaticallly try to get the most out of your learning
Exactly, that's what I was thinking. The experiment is such an artificial learning task, the word 'intention' here cannot be conflated with being super interested in recalling words. I would like to see an experiment that uses a real project like learning an instrument or a language, something that is meaningful.
"There is simply no good evidence that learning styles matter"...I love that. I would love to drop that bombshell on my fruity Elementary Education professors. Think I'll keep it to myself though as they may flunk me out of school.
Except, you know, the research about learning styles associated to neurodivergent or non-neurotypical individuals like autistics and other groups. I'm actually a little p'd off that this guy doesn't understand that these individuals and the research on that COUNTS towards "evidence" that learning styles matter. (No aggression meant towards you)
@@kharmachaos667 I couldn't have said this better myself. Learning disabilities are real.
Well is recollection of a list of words one afternoon indicate 'learning'?
Maybe they should ask about the list of words the next day, or in a week. Is that considered a different type of learning?
Maybe presenting a new concept or technique and having them summon it from thier memory would be better. And making claims based on one study (probably done with a bunch of undergrad students) is helpful in finding truth but I think further research is needed to validate the findings. I'm skeptical about how the findings of the study are presented, I'd like to see results from other studies also.
Wow, I'm about to witness this video about to hit 1 million views.
what to do if I dazed off before the 1:00 mark?...
3 & 5 need to be compared & contrasted. Only differences i see is level of evidence. A few words on the topic of 3. Learning style is based on the person, you cant teach someone a learning style, they need to know and understand all the techniques of learning as well as the 101 of the learning brain before they can actually develop (i like to use the word schedule) their ordered tasks of learning. A learning style is just a preference of techniques that flow well in order with the person.
this help me x1000 time
anyone notice how the view count decreases from video to video?
0:43 I knew the answer after that.
Maybe I should be studying right now
yeah, i was pretty bummed out when he said Motivation's not needed to study, but i guess he's kinda right since even if you have a motivation to study and you used a Shallow way of studying, then it's not really effective for studying. Also, most people tries to find motivation, waiting for it to come... like me, I'm always unmotivated, I wanted to be motivated, and when it comes, it only lasts for a while and then it's gone..i guess he's just saying that u dnt need motivation to study
The amount of effort you put into studying shows progress not the amount of time you put in.
how can you apply this to the STEM fields. I'm in engineering and we have alot of concepts/formulas to learn. any answers will be helpful
+eddie As an engineering student as well, I find it easier to recall concepts/formulas if you understand and can derive the formula, or can explain the concept using fundamental theories/laws. Being able to derive formulas or explain concepts through fundamental sub-concepts are examples of the deeper level of processing .
+BADDBrad52 can you give an example for like a concept/formula for what ever subject. do explain it to some one in a simplified way? Not sure if you know about scott young and his tactics
+eddie you*
ok we understand that deep processing is the best way to understand and recall material BUT tell us how we can process information at a deep level give us practical ideas..
4:05 level of procssing (: not processing
why i didn't understand the thing about the groups? :O
You know, it's funny, I picked the incorrect answer and you said those who picked the correct one are _on the right path to successful study_. Well, isn't everyone there now after the topic has been explained regardless of the choice they made prior to the explanation ? ;)
i disagree with the first underlined statement at 6:38 I believe motivation to learn will indefinitely effect your learning.
Correct answer flashes at 0:45
well the control group is only 2% less so why cant you just study that way ?!???????
I got it right. :)
I lol'ed when I realised the school was called SAMFORD University instead of STANFORD University
Here for homework. Anyone else?
This video is incredibly engaging right until the point where the music starts way to early....never knew music could annoy me so much
What Sudents (sic!) Should Understand…
It took you till the 2nd video to realize that?
Dr Chew ily
When u knew it was 5 before the flash or the reveal ^-^
This stuff changed my life
I learned that shallow strategies dont help us learn as mentioned in the video and we dont learn from that kind of stuff.
So "Paying close attention to the material as I study" isn't more important than "What I think about while I study?"
I'm sorry, I didn't realize that those weren't basically the same thing.
So... I am on the wrong path for staying on task and paying attention to the material.
It's interesting to know that the intention to learn does not help!!!!
Commenting for school
Is it just me or did people heard the professor's school as Stanford University?
One thing that doesn't make sense to me. They all had an intent to learn otherwise they wouldn't have participated, they just didn't have an intent to complete a test, which didn't make much of a difference whether or not they knew they were being tested or not. That would depend on the population being tested as well as what the incentive is to score high on the test "The Reward". He kept saying "Intent to learn made no difference". Unless the incidental groups were not told which level of processing to perform and simply did it on their own? I don't think that's what happened.
I want to be called Mr. Chew!!
Who noticed that the "correct path" flashed at 0:44 ? Subliminal messaging!
saw that
ok confusing. key words can get me thinking about a situation or an event and that can interrupt my focus on my studies
It's not subliminal if you notice it lol.
Well i knew the answer, because i know that's my problem,...everytime i try to study my brain freezes...
Muy bueno, tambien lo podria editar en español?
no, claro! aprenderé ingles mejor.
I'm watching all 5 parts for extra credit...
you were a brave person
Props to you. I could never. I'm only getting regular credit for this shit.