It's firm and smooth -- the date actually has a small click area before it's actual click so this is kind of my fault. It is lined up when set properly
I could not agree more. I have owned so many 2892's and sold them all, I just don't like the caller especially when traveling and all you want to do is bump the hour hand. I'm crazy about the new Navitimer sans chronograph but I just can't buy a GMT that's not a traveler.
Shame the date in the thumbnail is not centered..
Wow, this is a killer GMT, and makes me totally interested in Breitling now
It's trash. 6k+ for an office GMT with 42hr power reserve is a complete joke. You can find those on microbrands for less than 2k.
@@robertposteschild2353 no it’s not. I’m wearing it right now and guarantee that it’s totally awesome!
How does the slide rule move? And that off center date - arg! Great color at least, looks like the new 1908
It's firm and smooth -- the date actually has a small click area before it's actual click so this is kind of my fault. It is lined up when set properly
Great review thank you!
A Bremont getting more valuable?
it would've been so much more aesthetically better if that date window was also a circle .. Still a Great Looking Piece :)
Is it me or do all the hands look short?
>not a traveler GMT
Goddamnit why does Breitling actively try to make me not give them my money.
I could not agree more. I have owned so many 2892's and sold them all, I just don't like the caller especially when traveling and all you want to do is bump the hour hand. I'm crazy about the new Navitimer sans chronograph but I just can't buy a GMT that's not a traveler.
“3 hand gmt” seems like not quite accurate? I know what you mean, but it is 4 hands…
starfox...