It's firm and smooth -- the date actually has a small click area before it's actual click so this is kind of my fault. It is lined up when set properly
I could not agree more. I have owned so many 2892's and sold them all, I just don't like the caller especially when traveling and all you want to do is bump the hour hand. I'm crazy about the new Navitimer sans chronograph but I just can't buy a GMT that's not a traveler.
Shame the date in the thumbnail is not centered..
Wow, this is a killer GMT, and makes me totally interested in Breitling now
Great review thank you!
A Bremont getting more valuable?
How does the slide rule move? And that off center date - arg! Great color at least, looks like the new 1908
It's firm and smooth -- the date actually has a small click area before it's actual click so this is kind of my fault. It is lined up when set properly
it would've been so much more aesthetically better if that date window was also a circle .. Still a Great Looking Piece :)
“3 hand gmt” seems like not quite accurate? I know what you mean, but it is 4 hands…
>not a traveler GMT
Goddamnit why does Breitling actively try to make me not give them my money.
I could not agree more. I have owned so many 2892's and sold them all, I just don't like the caller especially when traveling and all you want to do is bump the hour hand. I'm crazy about the new Navitimer sans chronograph but I just can't buy a GMT that's not a traveler.
Is it me or do all the hands look short?
starfox...