After a curtain point it's no longer about the money it's about the work and the love of acting do you think Ryan Reynolds or Sandra Bullock etc still need money 💰 🙄
@@breewashereit's not that she isn't working. She just don't want to be in acting business. Zayn stopped doing concerts bcz of his anxiety but he was doing other things like collab with fashion companies and doing songs with other singers for movies, and now also doing voice over. He is moving towards business. Those ppl have the luxury to do business abd investment bcz they have right ppl to help them out and they have the money and I think it's nice for those who don't want to be in limelight all the time.
Nothing wrong with bored... if you can be happy while you're bored, iz legit a freedom (imoe) And then you get to do things you really want to, not just Think you want. Because it comes from a silent contentedness, not boredom
@@SleepyMagii Are you kidding? Have you seen Jim Carrey movies? He Will die from boredum I don't think Jesus or the budda will stop the voices in his head 😅
@@Hawkfeet okii 😊👍 I was only speaking from my own experience that I found extremely valuable... OBVIOUSLY neither me nor you or anyone would know Jim's own perspective on the silence that substrates the phenomenal, other than the own experiencer, Jim. But yes, I have seen his movies. Have you seen more than his movies? Like of the actual man? Because from my perspective, he's already walking that road... But, I am confused on why you would phrase it like that? Like I have said that a buddha like yeshua or gautuma would bring him? Or like his charecter IS who he is 😅 Tried my best, Bless! 💙🙏🏼
She didn't make it out before that though. She's on a G7 council and has been advocating for women's rights for a long while. And we all know that there are a ton of people who think those rights are bad.
Economics change, so politics change. Women's rights make perfect sense in some eras, not in others. After WW1 in Europe, there were not a lot of woman wanting more from men, when there was a huge shortage of men, and wealth. Not a huge number of feminists in the Great Depression or the 1950s either. Same with working classes, as they come into demand, we will get more socialist because there are less exploitative jobs available. When times are good we get more capitalist.
@@elizabethjohnston3549in the west woman have equal rights, so who's she even advocating for? 😂 I've never seen here in the middle east or Africa, she's just a virtue signalling pos.
Daniel: continued acting, but hasn’t hit it as big as he did with Potter. Emma: Flourished as an actress and took a break to focus on other aspects of her life. Rupert: Ice cream truck :)
Daniel Radcliffe has said he made enough money as Harry Potter that he could now chose the off-beat, zany roles that appealed to him, not necessarily the ones that would bring him the most money.
He's not trying to make it big. He's doing what he finds fun or interesting. And some are hit, some are more miss... but HE is enjoying it. Swiss Army Man was awesome.
@@TheSlyDragon93Cuz he actually enjoys acting lol and has said in interviews he likes the weird smaller roles and in his earlier career wanted to do anything that could get him UNassociated as only being harry potter.
Rickman was talking about them as kids. They were inexperienced and needed a director that was not managing a blockbuster franchise. That or an acting coach. Everyone remembers at least one moment where she would enunciated everything too much. It was charming and cute for a kid but they all needed training This totally took the comments out of context
Yes, and most of them weren’t very good in at least the first two movies or so. The only kids that were good actors from the jump were Matthew Lewis (Neville) and Tom Felton (Draco), sometimes Rupert Grint (Ron).
She'd love to act and I recall reading an interview where she talked about wanting to working with many big directors, even naming several (I can't remember the name of the interview where she talked about it). Unfortunately there are few respected filmmakers who'd like to work with her after her recent performances and the criticism she got for them (deservedly), and I don't think Emma wants (or needs for financial reasons) to take just about any role just to be an actress. She was a great Hermione, but unfortunately her acting skills didn't improve much over the course of the series. The opposite of Dan, really...
@@triton4411 Yeah the only other character I can think of that she played is Belle who is also a lot like Hermione. She’s getting typecast into the bookish girl roles.
@@nuclearcatbaby1131She’s been in quite a bit actually, I see her pop up from time to time in indie films and films for smaller niche audiences for smaller production companies, but yeah, her most notable was definitely Belle after Hermione. She’s been typecast and I know how frustrating that can be as someone who did quite a bit of local stage acting earlier on and was notoriously typecast. It’s infuriating when one wants to build on and into different characters. It happens more with women than it does with men in the industry I’m afraid. It happens to men as well, but not nearly as often as it does for women and as they age they have to begin writing and directing their own parts and films in order to do anything they really like as they are considered to have “aged out”.
Yup. Remember when she spoke of how on the night of her 18th birthday the paparazzi sat on the floor to take pictures up her skirt and uploaded them because she had just turned 18 so it wasn't illegal anymore? And she woke up to see them the morning after? It's literally heartbreaking.
How often do people say that if they won a lottery, they would quit work and pursue whatever they desire? So Emma has $85 mil. Shouldn't be surprising that she wants to pursue her own projects. Why bother committing to acting and the bull that comes with fame. She can live a chill life, low key. Good for her.
I don’t care what profession I was in, if I had $85 million you’d never fucking hear from me again. I would literally hire somebody full-time 24 seven to make sure nobody knew where I was what I was doing or anything about me so I could have nothing but my money and my privacy.
Thing is, most people drawn to acting like to be in the limelight, at least somewhat. Makes you wonder what happened that put her off acting so completely.
@ford289cid7 child actors usually don't have a childhood. Imagine being famous at age 8 or 9 or something like that. You know when you already feel weird about yourself. Next thing you know everyone knows who you are and assume the character you play on TV is actually you. Or only wants to be your friend because you are famous and know other famous people since you work with them. It can be very isolating for young people. I am not 100% sure why she decided to stop acting, but I am sure that may have been a contributing factor.
Jk Rowling DID NOT personally pick Emma Watson for the role of Hermione. She didn’t even know who she was until after she had the role and they were filming. And while she did know Evanna Lynch (character Luna) through some correspondence when Evanna suffered from an eating disorder, she found out she got the role and was pleasantly surprised. She had no say in deciding the roles for anybody in the HP movies. She sold the rights to Warner Brothers.
@kevin8439: I disagree. It's selling self respect for money, so it's the same as prostitution. There's really no need for such content in dramas as they add nothing to the storyline and are only of interest to voyeurs and wankers.
@lynnhall8720 Why is someone having enough self-respect to be comfortable appearing nude so offensive to you? If someone wants to do something with their own body, it's on them. Also, how did you come to the conclusion that you have the authority to decide for everyone what is frivolous and what isn't? Some people like the idea of being allowed to form their own opinions.
That was my favorite role of hers too! Loved that movie, and for whatever reason it really spoke to me as a teen at the time (im not sure why that movie specifically struck a chord and other YA stuff didnt at the time) Ive never wanted to rewatch it mostly because it sits as a time capsule in my mind of that period of my life and how ive grown. I dont want to find out it wasnt actually as good as I remember, and as dumb as it sounds, dont want it to screw with my memories of teen experiences.
I’m happy for Watson. I just don’t understand how she’s been getting so much attention over the last few weeks. She wants to focus on her own goals so just let her do so.
@@Tony78432 Hope she’s comfortable. Then again, nothing she can do about it. Hey maybe she’ll want to come back to acting one day, but right now, she’s got goals in life. Either we support her or stay out of her way
Well... that video of her telling somebody to "get out of the way!" In a very rude manner, while exiting the bookstore- that's why she's been coming up on my fyp! It's been a while ago, but not that long!
Well Emma Watson one acted like a bitch when she was exiting a store but also she came out and attacked JK Rowling for saying "there are only two genders, male and female". I don't think she left Hollyweird I think Hollyweird left her.
She made more money then most people will ever see, she probably saved and invested it so she no longer has to work. Leaving for good reasons like relationships, business, and education means she can now pursue a different goal and has the funds to do so.
It was her diction, not her acting. He was actually quite fond of them all and stated they needed structure and direction, as they were all so young in these big roles. This is not "terrible acting".
@@winstonsol8713yeah everything I’ve seen her in it just seems like she’s playing herself. Even interviews it’s like “oh that’s just Hermione”. I’ve heard the same said about Daniel Radcliffe but I haven’t seen anything else he’s done
Se's a women...nothing will make her happy. If $70+ million and fame doesn't do the job and that attention is what most females chase after, and her being a man hating feminist isn't going to help, well nothing will make her happy. Happiness is always short term, it pops up and fades, you can't have eternal happiness as that's just called content. Chasing happiness only leads to misery.
I don’t think that acting is her calling. She is set for life as it is. She was a child actress so what can we expect? She did fine in the HP series. People who loved the books, overlooked the acting of the kids. We just appreciate that they stuck with it and did the best that they could. The 7th book should have been rewritten and movies 7 & 8 remade. Not their fault. Frankly, I believe that JKR lost her magic while writing the end of the story line. She was burned out, killed everyone off, and wrote an unrealistic ending.
You can tell works optional just from all her recent works. All of them are something you can tell she personally wants to partake in (like Little Women for example) rather than just doing it for the sake of a job (for example, Hugh Grant doing roles he's dislikes for the sake of a role)
From the first time I read my first Harry Potter book, back in 2000/2001 at the age of 30, I was hooked. I could see the characters in my mind's eye. The bright, luminescent big green eyes of Harry, with his black untameable hair (not unneat, untameable). Dudley with small beady eyes, blond hair and tremendously overweight. And then hermoine with her big teath and bushy hair. Bill, tall handsome and charlie, shorter than Bill but with strong arms. The 4 actors that were cast in these roles didn't fit the description at all and it was such a let down. I am hoping with a new series and the advances with CGI, we would hopefully br closer to the books. Also the changing of the plot or character between the book and the movies can also be fixed
They were the right people for the movie. They tried green contact lenses on Daniel Radcliffe but his eyes got infected from them. The first three movies followed the story in the book closely.Movie six was a real let down. It strayed significantly from the plot on the book, deleting or omitting events in the book but then adding totally irrelevant scenes in the movie that had nothing to do with the events in the book.
British people seem to be good with their money. You will notice that if you check the net worths of British stars that are no longer active and considered “old news”, they are still worth just about as much as they were in their prime. Not like over here in the US where you see that somebody who put out a bad album, or they don’t/can’t get leading roles anymore, you expect them to be broke, and they really are. Not so across the pond. Daniel Radcliffe is worth £95M pounds which is over $120 million, and he was a child star. They all were, and they really managed to keep their funds as opposed to falling victim to the “celebrity disease“. He retains his wealth instead of spending it on a bunch of nonsensical luxury, and most stars from the UK in general seem to avoid leeches in their entourages. Even Rupert Grint is worth $50 million. Just wow.
Yeah most of the times is due to bad management, look at Micheal Jackson one of the richest pop starts ever and the man was broke as hell, how was that even possible?!? They spend all on debit living it big but they don’t even know how much they have left then when it’s time to pay they have nothing left. Also the taxes they pay are crazy. In UK people aren’t that extreme if she came from a wealthy family they are posh and real posh people in the UK are very clever with their money. They’ll invest it and keep it coming for generations to come.
It's because Britain has "class" which you can't buy and culture you can't bypass. It's considered extremely poor taste to spaff your money up the wall on nonsense and rather than demonstrating social capital, it betrays a lack of attention to what matters and a lack of self-respect. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of Brits who go to the US because they lack that impulse, but real British class can't be bought or born into, it is earned. Which is why Prince Andrew has none and Barbara Windsor had it in spades.
So many actors fall into the ego and high of it all. Which makes child stars much more venerable to loosing it all as they are exposed to the celebrity world so much earlier.
Alan Rickman was correct about Emma Watson’s diction. It is terrible and she overcompensates to sound posh. She is also a horrible actress and her entitled attitude got her blacklisted by the film industry.
She was intelligent with her selection in acting roles. She maintained her wholesome character and that’s why she is so successful. You never see any negative press about her, it’s so rare to see this in Hollywood.
I don't think you looked very hard, the press either hides or praises her bad traits, such as bashing men and being a "powerful independent women", and her turning on J.K Rowling who made her famous.
Much respect for someone who has the wisdom to stay away after they get to a good level of success. It is wise to focus on other parts of life instead of being drawn like a moth to a flame.
Let's be honest. She didn't quit acting because she wanted to focus on relationships. She quit acting because she's not that good and her off screen antics have turned everybody off. At least she has 85 million to fall back on.
@@1jet1 definitely projecting there, killer. There's hundreds of people who have made millions of dollars from acting, music, and all other forms of entertainment, that do not deserve to be as popular as they are. Miley Cyrus was never a good actress or singer. Kristen Stewart placed the same character in every movie she's ever been in and has a chin like Jay Leno. Future raps the exact same song over and over and over again and let us not even talk about Will Smith's son Jaden Smith. Yet all of these people are millionaires in their own right. Does that mean that they deserve it? Absolutely not. Does that mean that they're talented? Hell fucking no. She got rich off of a movie series that would have been successful with or without her and from a Disney movie that was already popular and projected to sell billions before she even signed on to it. Clearly you're slower than pond water in January with molasses in it and have no idea what you're talking about.
@@1jet1 Good job with your projecting there, player! If we're acknowledging that she's a phenomenal actress. We have to acknowledge the fact that Paris Hilton, John Cena and Miley Cyrus are also phenomenal actors. We have to acknowledge that Miley Cyrus and Future make exceptional music and flavor Flav was the greatest reality TV show star to ever exist. You and I both know that all those people I just named are bottom of the barrel and that's where Emma Watson belongs as well. All these people have touched millions upon millions and yet they are completely untalented. Next you're going to tell me that the "cash me outside, how bout dat" chick is the greatest rapper alive. Your argument is completely nonsensical.
@@1jet1 we've already acknowledged that you're nothing but a troll. It's the reason why you haven't been able to come with anything to actually prove your point. Just because you wish you could have certain body parts of hers inside of your mouth, doesn't mean that she's a good actress. That just means that she's easy on the eyes. Tara Reid was easy on the eyes too and she couldn't act her way out of a paper bag. Pond water in January with molasses and it doesn't even come close to comparing to how slow you are. 85 million doesn't say otherwise. Either prove that all the people I have named are talented people in entertainment or own up to the fact that two things can be right at the same time and your beloved Emma is rich and also a horrible actress. Comparable to how horrible you are at proving your point.
Well she's always had a massive passion for a higher education because of subjects she has interest in studying further. She had to push back these pursuits for quite some time not just going to a Univeristy but other experiences she could have got within the film industry such as writing and things like that. So whatever she does I just know she'll put her full dedication into it just as she does with everything she's done! ❤
@@irenemcgrath7739 Yeah but Hermione was more average. It doesn't mean Emma Watson is Adriana Lima yk. It just means she was an average kid while Hermione wasn't ugly but you wouldn't be like yeah, she's this trio is cute.
I am thinking that may be a big factor. She is very clunky in her acting and she has never stepped outside of a Hermiony adjacent character seeing HP1 is excrciating for all her enunciation at 11 but her still bringing the same energy to Meg March in Little women was tragic.
She could have stepped out of being type cast in “This is the end” but she straight up left the set. So it seems like she is probably not good enough for the roles she wants and isn’t a fan of the fun roles that Daniel Radcliffe has embraced.
I admire her , truely she didn't overdo or tried to KEEP EXISTING and marathon of roles shes got enough money to not need to work anymore and have a comfortable life tbh thats exactly what Hermione would've ended up being 1 successful woman having the best of her life
@@smp5343 Not all of them, no. But most at her level of fame, imo, yeah. Saoirse Ronan, Florence Pugh and Timothee Chalamet act circles around her in Little Women, imo.
She timed that well, she did what she needed to do, she deserved the money she's set for life, no rush for her to come back, it wouldn't surprise me if she decided never to work again
She made her money. She went on to prove she is an actress who can succeed in more than one character role. Do whatever you want! ( caveat: as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else)
Well she was a raging alcoholic when she was a teenager. And stop blaming the city on dumb people making worse choices. Anything these people do or say is their own chooce
@@jacksonjacob7791I don’t see why that would mean she is ruined? She could be just choosing to naturally and gracefully age unlike most of the plastic fakes in Hollywood. People just don’t even know what natural aging looks like anymore because of Botox and instagram filters smh
Fun fact. She was originally never going to audition. Some of the other girls at her school did, but she didn’t want to. Eventually one of her teachers encouraged her to audition. Just kind of funny to me how one of my favorite movie characters wouldn’t have happened if that teacher hadn’t encouraged her to do it.
Alan rickman said that in his private journal still early in the films i believe. He also said daniel was more suited to be a director. They obviously both evolved since and im sure he did his best to mentor but i agree with him tbh. Her first couple hp movies were bad acting. Daniel's wasnt great either. And im a huge hp fan but i hardly ever watch the first two. They get much better after
@@FullmoonPhantom-dn2sr I do too but I'm in favor of the books tho and kind of just skip to 3 with movies. I've probably seen the first too much as a little kid. And she's not the sole reason at all. It's a combo of that, the CGI, and acting. I feel like they found their groove and were believable as best friends around 3 and up.
@@INFJGuy I loved both versions of Hermione. Generally, I just loved the tone of the beginning series. I may be guilty of being a Hermione as well. Of course, I loved all the books/movies. I was less a fan of the 5th or 6th one. Idr which. It was the one where the characters were at peak angst and Ron was such a jerk! That one was exhausting! Favorite book was the 4th and fav movie was perhaps the 5th.
Alan Rickman complimented Daniel Radcliffe by stating he should become a producer or director. Those jobs are much harder than acting. Emma Watson’s acting was always the worst of the cast, and her diction is still terrible. She over-enunciates in order to sound posh, which just comes across as pretentious.
@@FullmoonPhantom-dn2sr that's 6. Harry Potter and the time Ron was a royal git lol. I don't really have a fav book. They all have their place for me. Fav movies are 3,5, and 7. I'm looking forward to the HBO remake because there's so much left out of the movies. Like just hanging around being friends they can make time for. And 1 or 2 will take years to cover so I think it'll work out well.
Your assertion that "Emma Watson is one of the most successful actors of all time" is laughable. Her success is solely attributed to JK Rowling, whom she consistently disparages. Without Rowling, Watson would be insignificant. Her sparse acting endeavors further highlight her lack of talent, as even Alan Rickman once remarked.
Good for her. Many women left Hollywood for good reasons. And the British acting community is much more flexible and small enough for her to come back later.
To be fair, she has a lot of money not only from her movies but from her brand deals, fashion ambassador, etc. But I think the main reason she is stepping down is because she is the least talented of the trio. She is an okay actress but only because her early success made her a household name worldwide and she had the chance of 8 movies to learn to act from the best actors in the UK. If you compare her acting to Daniel or Ruperts she still falls short and never really diversified from the "Hermione" type character (Bookish and sassy) while Daniel and Rupert have thrown themselves into the craziest roles they could find as well as other HP alumni who show up in theater, cinema, sit coms and other acting gigs. She seems more successful because her acting gigs are always big projects but she hasn't really matured as an actor and the public that grew up with her is bound to catch up at some point if she keeps doing basic love stories.
@@mald379 - Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint can act. Emma Watson cannot, and was always the worst of the three. Rupert was naturally the most talented, but Daniel actually matured into the best actor of the child cast. It is why he has the most successful career as an adult. It is impossible to typecast him, at this point, because his roles are too varied.
Her acting shows her personality. She is well educated promoting literacy in young women. She wouldn’t accept a movie role of a stripper dancing on a pole, or a killer, or someone stupid. There are not too many roles for female librarians, so she’s better doing what’s best for her.
Okay this explains why she keeps being seen in my area (it's a pretty normal place, not going to say where obviously, but not a place you see big celebrities at all). I hope she gets to enjoy whatever it is she's wanting to do!
Good for her. I'm a little appalled they told her to finish Harry Potter and to focus on education later. I loved her as Hermione and vaguely remember when she wanted to leave HP but didn't know it was because of school. I'm glad she's focusing on what makes her happy.
That is awful. Though, I agree with them, her leaving definitely would’ve ruined the franchise. If they had to switch out one of the 3 main cast. I hate when that happens in stories. Besides, she’s set for life because of that role. She has all the time in the world to do whatever she likes now. She might not have had that before.
I remember watching Harry Potter for the first time in Jr High and developing a small crush on her. Later on I eventually watched every original Harry Potter film. I honestly don't see the problem with her acting at that time.
Emma’s acting is just okay. She just needs to work on stop making the same facial expressions she had as Hermione. A lot of actors and actresses have this issue; they act the same in all roles.
Thank you! Not just because of her bad acting and worse singing but the story changes ruined it. For example - in the cartoon, you can actually see them falling in love. Beast wants to give her the library to do something nice for her. In the live action, he does it to brag because he’s being rude.
@@KittenUndercover I agree, plus there was no chemistry or believability. In most of her roles she comes off as a know it all and that just wasn't Belle at all.
She's set for life. No need for her to work anyway.
You'd still get bored without having any work to focus on and some people just like working.
After a curtain point it's no longer about the money it's about the work and the love of acting do you think Ryan Reynolds or Sandra Bullock etc still need money 💰 🙄
@@breewasherework is slavery end of the day. No freedom 🤮😂
@@breewashereit's not that she isn't working. She just don't want to be in acting business. Zayn stopped doing concerts bcz of his anxiety but he was doing other things like collab with fashion companies and doing songs with other singers for movies, and now also doing voice over. He is moving towards business. Those ppl have the luxury to do business abd investment bcz they have right ppl to help them out and they have the money and I think it's nice for those who don't want to be in limelight all the time.
@@rustyshackleford6035lol such a random pick of celebs Sandra bullock?? 😂 she doesn't act much
“I have enough
I have done enough
I am enough”
-Jim Carrey
No one wants to work for corrupt ass Hollywood anymore...
I don't think he will retire
He will be bored
Nothing wrong with bored... if you can be happy while you're bored, iz legit a freedom (imoe)
And then you get to do things you really want to, not just Think you want. Because it comes from a silent contentedness, not boredom
@@SleepyMagii
Are you kidding?
Have you seen Jim Carrey movies?
He Will die from boredum
I don't think Jesus or the budda will stop the voices in his head 😅
@@Hawkfeet okii 😊👍
I was only speaking from my own experience that I found extremely valuable...
OBVIOUSLY neither me nor you or anyone would know Jim's own perspective on the silence that substrates the phenomenal, other than the own experiencer, Jim.
But yes, I have seen his movies. Have you seen more than his movies? Like of the actual man? Because from my perspective, he's already walking that road...
But, I am confused on why you would phrase it like that? Like I have said that a buddha like yeshua or gautuma would bring him?
Or like his charecter IS who he is 😅
Tried my best, Bless! 💙🙏🏼
Actors who get out before they have a chance to become villains in the Hollywood Politics game are the smart ones.
She didn't make it out before that though. She's on a G7 council and has been advocating for women's rights for a long while. And we all know that there are a ton of people who think those rights are bad.
Economics change, so politics change. Women's rights make perfect sense in some eras, not in others.
After WW1 in Europe, there were not a lot of woman wanting more from men, when there was a huge shortage of men, and wealth.
Not a huge number of feminists in the Great Depression or the 1950s either.
Same with working classes, as they come into demand, we will get more socialist because there are less exploitative jobs available. When times are good we get more capitalist.
She doesn't advocate for real womens right s , she is woke
@@elizabethjohnston3549in the west woman have equal rights, so who's she even advocating for? 😂 I've never seen here in the middle east or Africa, she's just a virtue signalling pos.
@@mimcduffee86 J.K is the one advocating for women's rights. Many others are content to let men steal that too.
Daniel: continued acting, but hasn’t hit it as big as he did with Potter.
Emma: Flourished as an actress and took a break to focus on other aspects of her life.
Rupert: Ice cream truck :)
Daniel Radcliffe has said he made enough money as Harry Potter that he could now chose the off-beat, zany roles that appealed to him, not necessarily the ones that would bring him the most money.
@@cr3237 aye, fair enough
He's not trying to make it big. He's doing what he finds fun or interesting. And some are hit, some are more miss... but HE is enjoying it. Swiss Army Man was awesome.
...and a Lego House.
@@someteennamedcharles2035 James May also has a Lego House lol
Emma Watson has more than enough money to retire comfortably at this point.
Meanwhile Radcliffe cherrypicking any film that sounds fun 😂
@@TheSlyDragon93Cuz he actually enjoys acting lol and has said in interviews he likes the weird smaller roles and in his earlier career wanted to do anything that could get him UNassociated as only being harry potter.
@@TheSlyDragon93it about choice, kudos to both
Is Emma Watson still self partnering?🤔
@@TheSlyDragon93 He just loves his job, some people do it for money and others do it for fun and love.
She has 85 million reasons to leave acting
85,000,001 if you count Hollywood's perversion.
Bruh i misread "she has 85 million dollars to leave acting" 😂
But baby i just need 1 good one to stay
She’ll be broke by her 40s..that’s nothing and just because she made 85 she probably has one third of thag
@jessicagalvan3358 did you miss the part where he says she actually working? She won't be broke if she works and makes good financial decisions.
Rickman was talking about them as kids. They were inexperienced and needed a director that was not managing a blockbuster franchise. That or an acting coach. Everyone remembers at least one moment where she would enunciated everything too much. It was charming and cute for a kid but they all needed training
This totally took the comments out of context
Good point
Very common.
Not at all classy.
Yes, and most of them weren’t very good in at least the first two movies or so. The only kids that were good actors from the jump were Matthew Lewis (Neville) and Tom Felton (Draco), sometimes Rupert Grint (Ron).
They never shoukd have revealed them anyway. A disgusting violation in my opinion.
@@Kronos74 context?
I think her quitting is a smart choice
She is a real life Hermione. More interested in books than acting
I remember her saying she didn’t feel like she was like Hermione in real life.
@nuclearcatbaby1131 and I remember the entire cast of the Harry Potter movies saying Emma Watson was Hermione in real life.
She'd love to act and I recall reading an interview where she talked about wanting to working with many big directors, even naming several (I can't remember the name of the interview where she talked about it). Unfortunately there are few respected filmmakers who'd like to work with her after her recent performances and the criticism she got for them (deservedly), and I don't think Emma wants (or needs for financial reasons) to take just about any role just to be an actress. She was a great Hermione, but unfortunately her acting skills didn't improve much over the course of the series. The opposite of Dan, really...
@@triton4411 Yeah the only other character I can think of that she played is Belle who is also a lot like Hermione. She’s getting typecast into the bookish girl roles.
@@nuclearcatbaby1131She’s been in quite a bit actually, I see her pop up from time to time in indie films and films for smaller niche audiences for smaller production companies, but yeah, her most notable was definitely Belle after Hermione. She’s been typecast and I know how frustrating that can be as someone who did quite a bit of local stage acting earlier on and was notoriously typecast. It’s infuriating when one wants to build on and into different characters. It happens more with women than it does with men in the industry I’m afraid. It happens to men as well, but not nearly as often as it does for women and as they age they have to begin writing and directing their own parts and films in order to do anything they really like as they are considered to have “aged out”.
Good for her. The industry is evil
I would also say that after receiving millions of dollars
I don’t think so i think it can be
Yup. Remember when she spoke of how on the night of her 18th birthday the paparazzi sat on the floor to take pictures up her skirt and uploaded them because she had just turned 18 so it wasn't illegal anymore? And she woke up to see them the morning after? It's literally heartbreaking.
@@TheRunobenI hope you're making a joke
@@trish1aswani no, it can be evil and needs to improve but its not always
If the tabloids treated me like they did her, I would want to leave too honestly
How often do people say that if they won a lottery, they would quit work and pursue whatever they desire? So Emma has $85 mil. Shouldn't be surprising that she wants to pursue her own projects. Why bother committing to acting and the bull that comes with fame. She can live a chill life, low key. Good for her.
I don’t care what profession I was in, if I had $85 million you’d never fucking hear from me again. I would literally hire somebody full-time 24 seven to make sure nobody knew where I was what I was doing or anything about me so I could have nothing but my money and my privacy.
OK Miss Garbo
This is so funny but hard agree. Having 'enough' is more profound than most people realise - it's smtg most people never get
Thing is, most people drawn to acting like to be in the limelight, at least somewhat. Makes you wonder what happened that put her off acting so completely.
@@ford289cid7 she satiated her desire to be in the spotlight. Now she can ride off into the sunset, always looking fondly back on those days
@ford289cid7 child actors usually don't have a childhood. Imagine being famous at age 8 or 9 or something like that. You know when you already feel weird about yourself. Next thing you know everyone knows who you are and assume the character you play on TV is actually you. Or only wants to be your friend because you are famous and know other famous people since you work with them. It can be very isolating for young people. I am not 100% sure why she decided to stop acting, but I am sure that may have been a contributing factor.
Good on her. She made her money and can now live a normal life. Hollywood is evil.
Its not, it can be
I wouldn’t say someone with 85 million will be living a normal life
@@Theproclaimed so you wouldn’t proclaim someone with 85mil to be living a normal life?
Yeah but she's one of them too
She will never live a normal life ever sadly.
Jk Rowling DID NOT personally pick Emma Watson for the role of Hermione. She didn’t even know who she was until after she had the role and they were filming. And while she did know Evanna Lynch (character Luna) through some correspondence when Evanna suffered from an eating disorder, she found out she got the role and was pleasantly surprised. She had no say in deciding the roles for anybody in the HP movies. She sold the rights to Warner Brothers.
She made a success of acting without ever appearing nude or doing sex scenes, thus retaining her dignity and integrity. Much respect! ✊
Well there was a movie where she showed her breast and I was caught off guard when I was watching that movie
She leaked her own nude photos like every other starlet.
Nude or sex scenes aren't bad and not harming dignity and integrity if it has artistic value. But yeah, she didn't do a lot of "artsy" movies.
@kevin8439: I disagree. It's selling self respect for money, so it's the same as prostitution. There's really no need for such content in dramas as they add nothing to the storyline and are only of interest to voyeurs and wankers.
@lynnhall8720 Why is someone having enough self-respect to be comfortable appearing nude so offensive to you? If someone wants to do something with their own body, it's on them.
Also, how did you come to the conclusion that you have the authority to decide for everyone what is frivolous and what isn't? Some people like the idea of being allowed to form their own opinions.
Outside of her role in Harry Potter, her playing Sam in the Perks of Being a Wallflower was my favorite
This is the end was hilarious too
@@Bilski86just a cameo
@@velvet_victor very well aware
That was my favorite role of hers too!
Loved that movie, and for whatever reason it really spoke to me as a teen at the time (im not sure why that movie specifically struck a chord and other YA stuff didnt at the time) Ive never wanted to rewatch it mostly because it sits as a time capsule in my mind of that period of my life and how ive grown. I dont want to find out it wasnt actually as good as I remember, and as dumb as it sounds, dont want it to screw with my memories of teen experiences.
Umm,, she was nice in the film but very apart from what Sam was in the books!
I’m happy for Watson. I just don’t understand how she’s been getting so much attention over the last few weeks. She wants to focus on her own goals so just let her do so.
The common folk need something to talk about lol 😂
@@Tony78432 Hope she’s comfortable. Then again, nothing she can do about it. Hey maybe she’ll want to come back to acting one day, but right now, she’s got goals in life. Either we support her or stay out of her way
Well... that video of her telling somebody to "get out of the way!" In a very rude manner, while exiting the bookstore- that's why she's been coming up on my fyp! It's been a while ago, but not that long!
@andreaknisley154 you are thinking of emma Roberts....not emma watson.
Well Emma Watson one acted like a bitch when she was exiting a store but also she came out and attacked JK Rowling for saying "there are only two genders, male and female".
I don't think she left Hollyweird I think Hollyweird left her.
How many of us thought it was gonna be another kind of out from the title? 😅
She made more money then most people will ever see, she probably saved and invested it so she no longer has to work. Leaving for good reasons like relationships, business, and education means she can now pursue a different goal and has the funds to do so.
It was her diction, not her acting. He was actually quite fond of them all and stated they needed structure and direction, as they were all so young in these big roles. This is not "terrible acting".
Hey, why let facts get in the way of a good out-of-context quote?
@@MarieAnne.Exactly 😂
She’s a bad actor. Rupert Grint was the only real actor of the three.
@@winstonsol8713yeah everything I’ve seen her in it just seems like she’s playing herself. Even interviews it’s like “oh that’s just Hermione”. I’ve heard the same said about Daniel Radcliffe but I haven’t seen anything else he’s done
@@Catherine.Dorian. no it isnt like that with dan. Watch the show "miracle workers" he's brilliant in that
Serious respect for that. I’m glad she’s finding things in life that make her happy
Se's a women...nothing will make her happy. If $70+ million and fame doesn't do the job and that attention is what most females chase after, and her being a man hating feminist isn't going to help, well nothing will make her happy. Happiness is always short term, it pops up and fades, you can't have eternal happiness as that's just called content. Chasing happiness only leads to misery.
I don’t think that acting is her calling. She is set for life as it is. She was a child actress so what can we expect? She did fine in the HP series. People who loved the books, overlooked the acting of the kids. We just appreciate that they stuck with it and did the best that they could. The 7th book should have been rewritten and movies 7 & 8 remade. Not their fault. Frankly, I believe that JKR lost her magic while writing the end of the story line. She was burned out, killed everyone off, and wrote an unrealistic ending.
If I had $85 million dollar I wouldn’t work anywhere anymore. 😂
She's wealthy. She is financially independent. Work is optional for her. She has some serious sources of income though.
You can tell works optional just from all her recent works. All of them are something you can tell she personally wants to partake in (like Little Women for example) rather than just doing it for the sake of a job (for example, Hugh Grant doing roles he's dislikes for the sake of a role)
Good for her. She did her acting and made her money. It's probably the healthiest decision. Honestly, Hollywood looks real toxic.
From the first time I read my first Harry Potter book, back in 2000/2001 at the age of 30, I was hooked. I could see the characters in my mind's eye. The bright, luminescent big green eyes of Harry, with his black untameable hair (not unneat, untameable). Dudley with small beady eyes, blond hair and tremendously overweight. And then hermoine with her big teath and bushy hair. Bill, tall handsome and charlie, shorter than Bill but with strong arms. The 4 actors that were cast in these roles didn't fit the description at all and it was such a let down. I am hoping with a new series and the advances with CGI, we would hopefully br closer to the books. Also the changing of the plot or character between the book and the movies can also be fixed
They were the right people for the movie. They tried green contact lenses on Daniel Radcliffe but his eyes got infected from them. The first three movies followed the story in the book closely.Movie six was a real let down. It strayed significantly from the plot on the book, deleting or omitting events in the book but then adding totally irrelevant scenes in the movie that had nothing to do with the events in the book.
She was a remarkable Meg in LITTLE WOMEN.
1000%
I love Emma Watson and I hope she’s doing good outside of acting
I mean she should just relax but what she does for other work is misguided.
I hear she got certified to teach yoga at some point!
@@JohnDoe-og2bt What did she do?
British people seem to be good with their money. You will notice that if you check the net worths of British stars that are no longer active and considered “old news”, they are still worth just about as much as they were in their prime. Not like over here in the US where you see that somebody who put out a bad album, or they don’t/can’t get leading roles anymore, you expect them to be broke, and they really are. Not so across the pond. Daniel Radcliffe is worth £95M pounds which is over $120 million, and he was a child star. They all were, and they really managed to keep their funds as opposed to falling victim to the “celebrity disease“. He retains his wealth instead of spending it on a bunch of nonsensical luxury, and most stars from the UK in general seem to avoid leeches in their entourages. Even Rupert Grint is worth $50 million. Just wow.
Maybe it has to do with the parents not relying on their children for an income 🤔
Yup people in the states are poor poor and the parents and brothers and sisters and all use that money to live comfortably
Yeah most of the times is due to bad management, look at Micheal Jackson one of the richest pop starts ever and the man was broke as hell, how was that even possible?!? They spend all on debit living it big but they don’t even know how much they have left then when it’s time to pay they have nothing left. Also the taxes they pay are crazy. In UK people aren’t that extreme if she came from a wealthy family they are posh and real posh people in the UK are very clever with their money. They’ll invest it and keep it coming for generations to come.
It's because Britain has "class" which you can't buy and culture you can't bypass. It's considered extremely poor taste to spaff your money up the wall on nonsense and rather than demonstrating social capital, it betrays a lack of attention to what matters and a lack of self-respect. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of Brits who go to the US because they lack that impulse, but real British class can't be bought or born into, it is earned. Which is why Prince Andrew has none and Barbara Windsor had it in spades.
So many actors fall into the ego and high of it all. Which makes child stars much more venerable to loosing it all as they are exposed to the celebrity world so much earlier.
"Emma Watson is out.." got me thinking that she came out as gay or bisexual 😅 😂
She has grown up to be drop dead gorgeous
She was never not gorgeous. An English rose.
Alan Rickman’s personal diaries shouldn’t have been published
He intended for them to be published
Alan Rickman was correct about Emma Watson’s diction. It is terrible and she overcompensates to sound posh. She is also a horrible actress and her entitled attitude got her blacklisted by the film industry.
@@ChienaAvtzonbro does not like Emma Watson💀💀
@@ChienaAvtzon Not entitled at all. She was also a child in the Harry Potter films.
@@Mr0011011 - Her entitlement occurred on her post-HP movie sets.
She was intelligent with her selection in acting roles. She maintained her wholesome character and that’s why she is so successful. You never see any negative press about her, it’s so rare to see this in Hollywood.
Did you see The Bling Ring?
She is a wokie so the media love her.
She got slammed for being woke and stabbing JK Rowling in the back for suggesting that a woman is a female.
There's plenty of actors that don't have negative press. Lol
I don't think you looked very hard, the press either hides or praises her bad traits, such as bashing men and being a "powerful independent women", and her turning on J.K Rowling who made her famous.
Made 70 million from the movies and only worth 85?? Someone get this lady a financial advisor
Ah, Alan Rickman staying true to his character 😂
Sorry, but agree with Rickman, and more like Albania I would say Andorra 😂
what does that saying mean? Ive never heard it before
yeah I have no idea what the means too like is this an insult to Albanian actors or sth?
He said it about her DICTION not her acting. I think that makes a big difference.
@@annadrozd4214 - Emma Watson’s diction is terrible. She over-enunciates and does not understand proper grammar or vocabulary.
homie was spittin like an auctioneer
Fr some speed 🙈
Much respect for someone who has the wisdom to stay away after they get to a good level of success. It is wise to focus on other parts of life instead of being drawn like a moth to a flame.
She's more woke now , so no big loss.
Emma is a smart lady and I’m sure she will be fine whatever she chooses
Lovely sentiment. I agree.
i’m happy for her and hope this new chapter brings more happiness
I imagine it wouldn't take anyone with morals long to get tired of Hollywood.
Let's be honest. She didn't quit acting because she wanted to focus on relationships. She quit acting because she's not that good and her off screen antics have turned everybody off. At least she has 85 million to fall back on.
Oh dear, a troll needing a change in their medication 😅😂😅. 85 million says otherwise 😅😂😅
@@1jet1 definitely projecting there, killer. There's hundreds of people who have made millions of dollars from acting, music, and all other forms of entertainment, that do not deserve to be as popular as they are. Miley Cyrus was never a good actress or singer. Kristen Stewart placed the same character in every movie she's ever been in and has a chin like Jay Leno. Future raps the exact same song over and over and over again and let us not even talk about Will Smith's son Jaden Smith. Yet all of these people are millionaires in their own right. Does that mean that they deserve it? Absolutely not. Does that mean that they're talented? Hell fucking no. She got rich off of a movie series that would have been successful with or without her and from a Disney movie that was already popular and projected to sell billions before she even signed on to it. Clearly you're slower than pond water in January with molasses in it and have no idea what you're talking about.
@@1jet1 Good job with your projecting there, player! If we're acknowledging that she's a phenomenal actress. We have to acknowledge the fact that Paris Hilton, John Cena and Miley Cyrus are also phenomenal actors. We have to acknowledge that Miley Cyrus and Future make exceptional music and flavor Flav was the greatest reality TV show star to ever exist. You and I both know that all those people I just named are bottom of the barrel and that's where Emma Watson belongs as well. All these people have touched millions upon millions and yet they are completely untalented. Next you're going to tell me that the "cash me outside, how bout dat" chick is the greatest rapper alive. Your argument is completely nonsensical.
@@DocMartn253 Like I said. A troll, 85 million says otherwise 🤣😅🤣
@@1jet1 we've already acknowledged that you're nothing but a troll. It's the reason why you haven't been able to come with anything to actually prove your point. Just because you wish you could have certain body parts of hers inside of your mouth, doesn't mean that she's a good actress. That just means that she's easy on the eyes. Tara Reid was easy on the eyes too and she couldn't act her way out of a paper bag. Pond water in January with molasses and it doesn't even come close to comparing to how slow you are. 85 million doesn't say otherwise. Either prove that all the people I have named are talented people in entertainment or own up to the fact that two things can be right at the same time and your beloved Emma is rich and also a horrible actress. Comparable to how horrible you are at proving your point.
Emma Watson set boundaries. Mad respect.
Well she's always had a massive passion for a higher education because of subjects she has interest in studying further. She had to push back these pursuits for quite some time not just going to a Univeristy but other experiences she could have got within the film industry such as writing and things like that. So whatever she does I just know she'll put her full dedication into it just as she does with everything she's done! ❤
She's made a wise choice.
Glad she was talked out of quitting HP halfway through. It would have been awful with a different Hermione.
She wasn’t chosen by J K Rowling at all. She famously said she was too beautiful for the role of Hermione
Too beautiful?!! I see her as being quite plain.
Too beautiful?!! I see her as being quite plain.
Too beautiful?!! I see her as being quite plain.
@@irenemcgrath7739 Yeah but Hermione was more average. It doesn't mean Emma Watson is Adriana Lima yk. It just means she was an average kid while Hermione wasn't ugly but you wouldn't be like yeah, she's this trio is cute.
With all due respect, she was great in Harry Potter but every other films I’ve seen her in she hasn’t been phenomenal. I won’t miss her.
I am thinking that may be a big factor. She is very clunky in her acting and she has never stepped outside of a Hermiony adjacent character seeing HP1 is excrciating for all her enunciation at 11 but her still bringing the same energy to Meg March in Little women was tragic.
Depends on your expectations. I liked her in Beauty and the Beast. I’m more a fan of pre-1965 style movies.
May be , but I love her Meg March . I grew up reading Little women and Meg was exactly what I imagined.
She could have stepped out of being type cast in “This is the end” but she straight up left the set. So it seems like she is probably not good enough for the roles she wants and isn’t a fan of the fun roles that Daniel Radcliffe has embraced.
@@kenyonbissett3512
She can’t sing though. At the least they should have hired someone else to sing.
Don't worry, she'll return to acting in about 5-10 years for her next role in a niche A24 film
If she’s done, then she’s done 🙂🤷♂️
No point continuing to do something that your heart isn’t committed to.
I admire her , truely she didn't overdo or tried to KEEP EXISTING and marathon of roles shes got enough money to not need to work anymore and have a comfortable life tbh thats exactly what Hermione would've ended up being 1 successful woman having the best of her life
She’s been working since she was a kid. Can’t blame her.
When it said out, I thought you were going to say lesbian
an auctioneer doesn't speak that fast.
Ngl, no hate, she's set for life and good for her, but she really isn't that great an actress. You can always tell she's "acting".
Oh damn😂
she’s like a 7/10 on acting
@@smp5343 Not all of them, no. But most at her level of fame, imo, yeah.
Saoirse Ronan, Florence Pugh and Timothee Chalamet act circles around her in Little Women, imo.
What are we supposed to do with this opinion?
@@user-vi4xy1jw7eWhat do you mean? it's their opinion
She timed that well, she did what she needed to do, she deserved the money she's set for life, no rush for her to come back, it wouldn't surprise me if she decided never to work again
"This side of Albania" is WILD
Even for Alan Richman
These thumbnails get me every time 😂.
"Prime Minister of UK more likely than Harry Potter return" That's beautiful.
She made her money. She went on to prove she is an actress who can succeed in more than one character role. Do whatever you want! ( caveat: as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else)
My goodness it felt like he was recalling his study notes!
He needs a voice coach
At least she went out on her own time and rules and without miserable scandals. I quite like her.
This is why I love her. She didn't let Hollywood ruin her.
Ehhhh…I beg to differ.
She looks pretty rough in a recent photo I've seen of her.
She did become a raging feminist though.
Well she was a raging alcoholic when she was a teenager.
And stop blaming the city on dumb people making worse choices. Anything these people do or say is their own chooce
@@jacksonjacob7791I don’t see why that would mean she is ruined? She could be just choosing to naturally and gracefully age unlike most of the plastic fakes in Hollywood. People just don’t even know what natural aging looks like anymore because of Botox and instagram filters smh
She got tired of the casting couch ouch.
The fact that al the ‘CC’ are on her forehead got me dying 😂😂😂
Fun fact. She was originally never going to audition. Some of the other girls at her school did, but she didn’t want to. Eventually one of her teachers encouraged her to audition.
Just kind of funny to me how one of my favorite movie characters wouldn’t have happened if that teacher hadn’t encouraged her to do it.
Alan rickman said that in his private journal still early in the films i believe. He also said daniel was more suited to be a director. They obviously both evolved since and im sure he did his best to mentor but i agree with him tbh. Her first couple hp movies were bad acting. Daniel's wasnt great either. And im a huge hp fan but i hardly ever watch the first two. They get much better after
Really? I love the beginning of the franchise. Hermione was always my favorite character in HP.
@@FullmoonPhantom-dn2sr I do too but I'm in favor of the books tho and kind of just skip to 3 with movies. I've probably seen the first too much as a little kid. And she's not the sole reason at all. It's a combo of that, the CGI, and acting. I feel like they found their groove and were believable as best friends around 3 and up.
@@INFJGuy I loved both versions of Hermione. Generally, I just loved the tone of the beginning series. I may be guilty of being a Hermione as well. Of course, I loved all the books/movies. I was less a fan of the 5th or 6th one. Idr which. It was the one where the characters were at peak angst and Ron was such a jerk! That one was exhausting! Favorite book was the 4th and fav movie was perhaps the 5th.
Alan Rickman complimented Daniel Radcliffe by stating he should become a producer or director. Those jobs are much harder than acting. Emma Watson’s acting was always the worst of the cast, and her diction is still terrible. She over-enunciates in order to sound posh, which just comes across as pretentious.
@@FullmoonPhantom-dn2sr that's 6. Harry Potter and the time Ron was a royal git lol. I don't really have a fav book. They all have their place for me. Fav movies are 3,5, and 7. I'm looking forward to the HBO remake because there's so much left out of the movies. Like just hanging around being friends they can make time for. And 1 or 2 will take years to cover so I think it'll work out well.
Become an auctioneer man wtf
Your assertion that "Emma Watson is one of the most successful actors of all time" is laughable. Her success is solely attributed to JK Rowling, whom she consistently disparages. Without Rowling, Watson would be insignificant. Her sparse acting endeavors further highlight her lack of talent, as even Alan Rickman once remarked.
Good for her. Many women left Hollywood for good reasons. And the British acting community is much more flexible and small enough for her to come back later.
To be fair, she has a lot of money not only from her movies but from her brand deals, fashion ambassador, etc. But I think the main reason she is stepping down is because she is the least talented of the trio. She is an okay actress but only because her early success made her a household name worldwide and she had the chance of 8 movies to learn to act from the best actors in the UK. If you compare her acting to Daniel or Ruperts she still falls short and never really diversified from the "Hermione" type character (Bookish and sassy) while Daniel and Rupert have thrown themselves into the craziest roles they could find as well as other HP alumni who show up in theater, cinema, sit coms and other acting gigs. She seems more successful because her acting gigs are always big projects but she hasn't really matured as an actor and the public that grew up with her is bound to catch up at some point if she keeps doing basic love stories.
"f you compare her acting to Daniel or Ruperts she still falls short" I'M SORRY, what? have we seen the same HP movies?
@@mald379 - Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint can act. Emma Watson cannot, and was always the worst of the three. Rupert was naturally the most talented, but Daniel actually matured into the best actor of the child cast. It is why he has the most successful career as an adult. It is impossible to typecast him, at this point, because his roles are too varied.
Her acting shows her personality. She is well educated promoting literacy in young women. She wouldn’t accept a movie role of a stripper dancing on a pole, or a killer, or someone stupid. There are not too many roles for female librarians, so she’s better doing what’s best for her.
Favorite role from her is From this is the end
“Hermione just stole all our shit”
Okay this explains why she keeps being seen in my area (it's a pretty normal place, not going to say where obviously, but not a place you see big celebrities at all). I hope she gets to enjoy whatever it is she's wanting to do!
Good for her. I'm a little appalled they told her to finish Harry Potter and to focus on education later. I loved her as Hermione and vaguely remember when she wanted to leave HP but didn't know it was because of school. I'm glad she's focusing on what makes her happy.
I can relate
That is awful. Though, I agree with them, her leaving definitely would’ve ruined the franchise. If they had to switch out one of the 3 main cast. I hate when that happens in stories. Besides, she’s set for life because of that role. She has all the time in the world to do whatever she likes now. She might not have had that before.
They all should have been recast. That was the original plan.
Jk didn't personally pick her. I don't think I've ever seen a video of yours that's fully factual 😴😴
She is a great actress, and deserves to do anything she wants don’t listen to them, Emma!
well she's a disloyal woman now, so it's not like we'll miss someone like that anyhow.
She went out on top. Good for her.
Me still waiting for charles to realise that godzilla minus 1 is better than wonka and the best movie of this year
She won't be missed she trashed the woman that made her the super talented J K Rowling. Watson has no talent.
Thank God no more annoying feminists speeches 🤦🏽♀️
My girl Emma doesn't need to return. She already gave Harry Potter and Beauty and the Beast their popularity now leave this beauty queen alone
I remember watching Harry Potter for the first time in Jr High and developing a small crush on her. Later on I eventually watched every original Harry Potter film. I honestly don't see the problem with her acting at that time.
At first, I thought "OUT" as 🏳️🌈!
she did the right thing, shes not that much of an actress and obviously interested in other things
“Her acting is lifeless”
We chose the right hermone
Let’s be honest here. She is not much of an actor. And if she is happy not acting then everyone wins.
Why are the number of likes hidden after I like it?
She hit her wall quick.
She was never a good actress she is overrated.
She is getting regular checks from Harry potter royalties and has now turned against JK.
She threw JK under the bus and fed her to the wolves
Good!
Yeah Jk has said some rude things.
I have no respect for Emma Watson.
And here I was thinking the title of this video meant that she was gay 😭
I feel betrayed
Emma’s acting is just okay. She just needs to work on stop making the same facial expressions she had as Hermione. A lot of actors and actresses have this issue; they act the same in all roles.
I'm glad. I really wasn't a big fan of her work. Her role in Beauty and the Beast was terrible.
just like Daniel day Lewis is Lincoln
Thank you! Not just because of her bad acting and worse singing but the story changes ruined it. For example - in the cartoon, you can actually see them falling in love. Beast wants to give her the library to do something nice for her. In the live action, he does it to brag because he’s being rude.
@@KittenUndercover I agree, plus there was no chemistry or believability. In most of her roles she comes off as a know it all and that just wasn't Belle at all.
@@saifalam2030 Never seen it.
The public's main complaint about her in Beauty and the Beast - her singing! 🤣🤣🤣
She was a child actress, she did one character, she can't act 😅
Alan Rickman was critical of alot of the Harry Potter actors.
"Did we just get robbed by Hermione?"