Experience the Speed: Yamaha FX Cruiser SVHO Test Ride

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 янв 2025

Комментарии • 28

  • @LifeBeginsOnTheWater
    @LifeBeginsOnTheWater 11 месяцев назад +3

    Great review, thanks for sharing!
    Billy D

    • @BoatTEST
      @BoatTEST  11 месяцев назад

      Thanks for watching!

    • @TripSmith
      @TripSmith 11 месяцев назад

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @joef2504
    @joef2504 8 месяцев назад +3

    show the hull paint after you beached it...

  • @patrickmorel477
    @patrickmorel477 2 месяца назад +1

    Hello if i want best comfort with no supercharged should i go with an vx cruiser ho?

  • @efthimios
    @efthimios 6 месяцев назад

    I want a ski in this class and I can’t decide over this or the Sea-Doos GTX300 or 325 (either I don’t care I’d by the 300 as a leftover / used

  • @TeddysVentures
    @TeddysVentures 11 месяцев назад +2

    Great Review! I was hoping they would use the new 1.9 liter motor in the SVHO models this year though. What is the deadrise on the hull? The Kawi still have the edge for rough ocean handling.

  • @Baltintroshku
    @Baltintroshku 4 месяца назад +2

    What do u think i should get. For salt water I am originally a yamaha fan but performance plays a huge role so i am thinking of getting a see doo what do u think i should do ?

    • @BoatTEST
      @BoatTEST  4 месяца назад +1

      We have tested See Doo in the past and they're great, but honestly the technology that Yamaha has is quite unique and customer service 🙌 email editorial@boattest.com and jeff@boattest.com for some input.

    • @Aug4216
      @Aug4216 2 месяца назад

      Definitely Yamaha my fx waverunner is perfect for south fl

  • @JeffGriffin-m9l
    @JeffGriffin-m9l 7 месяцев назад +2

    I bought two of these recently since I had two 2018 Yamaha FX SVHO which were light, stable (not wobbly when getting on and off the ski) had great acceleration and an overall dry ride. The 2024's have a different body style and they ride completely different. The tech is great, but you have to pay $200 for the garmin thumb drive to get the maps to work. This ski is also not as nimble - handling is not too great. The ski is also not too stable. You need to make sure you adjust your weight when getting on and off the ski otherwise your going in the water. It has more of the traits of the GP or VX in that regard. The nose of the ski is more downward, which gives a much wetter ride in rough water. After doing research, I found out Yamaha used a ride plate that is intended to slow down the ski and is causing the nose to point downward, hence the wetter than normal ride. I had seen that swapping it out with an aftermarket ride plate and sponses resolves the wet ride and improves handling, however, it sounds like that may void the warranty.

    • @BoatTEST
      @BoatTEST  7 месяцев назад

      Very informative many thanks for sharing your experience as well as some tips!

    • @bob-a-louannamaria7960
      @bob-a-louannamaria7960 7 месяцев назад

      The 2024 hull and top deck haven’t changed at all

  • @danav3387
    @danav3387 9 месяцев назад

    I cannot get past that cathedral seating in the FX units. The SVHO back seat will fit and it gets rid of the hideous seats the cruiser and limited comes with. It is just so out of place, it’s like showing up at the car show with your grandmas 20 yr old wood panel minivan.

    • @sammiemakki9339
      @sammiemakki9339 9 месяцев назад

      The seats on the cruiser are the selling point for me. I’m 35 and I think they look much more comfortable. Id like to spend hours on the lake and take the wife sometimes too, so i’d want comfortable seats with good support

    • @mikelopez2628
      @mikelopez2628 7 месяцев назад

      I bought one and love it

  • @brandonstews238
    @brandonstews238 11 месяцев назад +7

    Hmmmm, top speed dropped a bit? My 2016 will do 74+ mph.

    • @MichaelLewandowski-i8g
      @MichaelLewandowski-i8g 11 месяцев назад +1

      Was thinking the same thing. My buddy has an older one. 74 stock. This review is garbage imo. Too much tech on a ski.

    • @TripSmith
      @TripSmith 11 месяцев назад +3

      Well, maybe..... They are governed like a lot of things these days. Pretty sure it had a good bit more it could have pushed on had it not been held back. I remember the Yamaha guys telling me some of the racers have them turned up ;) and that this hull is used for their offshore longer distance races.

    • @jimmyracecar7
      @jimmyracecar7 6 месяцев назад

      if its stock thats impossible cause they're limited to under 70 by the coast guard unless you're outside the US.

    • @CFG39
      @CFG39 5 месяцев назад

      @@brandonstews238 government mandates 69mph top speed for all PWCs now. There are ways around it though with software changes.

    • @marcomendez7622
      @marcomendez7622 5 месяцев назад

      I agree with your comment in my group some have a Yamaha supercharger without making any modifications they get between 72 to 74 mph if the water is flat and the driver is light

  • @kennethalcorn7104
    @kennethalcorn7104 11 месяцев назад +3

    😅its not rough at all

  • @RobesonMichael-m3k
    @RobesonMichael-m3k 4 месяца назад

    Lew Harbors

  • @timjordan969
    @timjordan969 6 месяцев назад

    Over complicated!! I just want to go fast and have fun on the water! Who needs a computer screen to look at? Who needs all the add ons?? Let me guess?? It costs 20k or more??…. Right?
    Wow that’s like $500.00 a month for 7 years….Ew….where I live we can only run about 3 months a year. No thanks to all the extra garbage just to increase the price. It’s a play machine not something you have to have like a car. You’re going too far, keep it simple!!

  • @MichaelLewandowski-i8g
    @MichaelLewandowski-i8g 11 месяцев назад +2

    Lol, Those conditions are weak! 😅🤦‍♂️