Daredevil Vs Kingpin | Moral Ethics
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июн 2024
- What stopped Matt from killing Kingpin? This show explores philosophical dilemmas in extremely captivating ways and I love discussing them.
Join me on Patreon! - / solipsistcinema
All music was produced and created by myself
Chapters:
0:00 Why Stop Here?
2:08 Self Corruption
9:08 Seeds Of Doubt.
12:14 Why Can’t He Do It?
Films and Television shows mentioned:
Daredevil created by Drew Goddard
Calvary directed by John Michael McDonagh
Doubt directed by John Patrick Shanley
Noah directed by Darren Aronofsky
Nomadland directed by Chloé Zhao
Batman V Superman directed by Zack Snyder
Zack Snyder’s Justice League directed by Zack Snyder
Man of Steel directed by Zack Snyder
Statistic about American’s not being able to afford $1,000 emergency: www.beaconjournal.com/story/n...
Questions, feedback, or anything else, contact me at solipsistcinema@proton.me
Join me on Patreon: Patreon.com/SolipsistCinema
Follow me on Letterboxd: SolipsistCinema
Instagram @solipsistcinema
Fair use is applicable to all the movie and television show clips used in this video, as specified in Section 107 of the Copyright Act. I am in accordance with all four aspects of this act. Part 1 is the purpose and character of the use. I am in accordance with this because I am commenting, reviewing, educating, and transforming the context and content to a point where it is something new. Part 2 is the nature of the copyrighted work. I am in accordance with this because I am not trying to present the used content as my own and am commenting on it and using it to create something new. Part 3 is the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole. I am in accordance with this because any of the clips I use are a inconsiderably small portion of the source material. Part 4 is the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. I am in accordance with this because my use of the material will have no financial harm upon the original work and I am crediting them easily so viewers can view the content for themselves. 
Кино
Read After The End Of The Video:
I know people are going to have problems with the comparisons of BvS’ Batman and Daredevil because Matt hasn’t purposefully killed someone in universe yet and this version of Batman has killed people before his interaction with Superman. Batman has killed indirectly by branding criminals to be taken care of in prison, or by annihilating them with his Batmobile. So these aren’t perfect parallels to each other but I do think that the similarities are worth acknowledging and exploring, even if you think one was done better than the other. This moment with Batman about to kill Superman is the lowest he’s been and his most personal and hands on experience with taking a life. So I think the exploration of his internal motives for being this drastic and moral toll it would have taken on him if he went through with it, is a very interesting dilemma for this film to bring up and I personally found it captivating and thought provoking.
I never thought one of the bests pieces of vigilantism media could ever show parallelisms to fricking Batman v Superman.
Are you referring to this video or the show with the compliment? Lol either way thanks for watching and yeah the parallels were there to find and they are both projects that I have a great amount of love for. So showing them in the same video was fun for me.
I love Kingpin and Lex. Thanks for upload.
Big difference. In BvS Superman isn't evil so Batman shouldn't kill him. The Kingpin is pure Lawful Evil and will ALWAYS find a way out of prison and inflict more harm on others. More people will die that wouldn't have. Some evil has to die to be stopped. I'm a war veteran and would have slept just fine ending the Kingpin's life knowing how many lives would be saved by doing it.
because then the conflict would be over.
The problem I have with killing criminals is that no matter how evil they are they will have family and people who care about them, for example let’s say a killer has a child you could argue that the killer deserves to die but dose the child deserve to lose their father? No they don’t that’s one of the reasons I believe it’s wrong to kill because imo it isn’t worth making innocent people suffer just to kill a bad person if you want to stop them from hurting others just throw them in jail for the rest of their life
I’m working on an essay discussing retributive justice in films that you might like. In that I find examples of cases where the perpetrator doesn’t have anybody to miss them and can’t be caught by law enforcement, at that point would you ever see killing them as justifiable? I like the point you brought up and it’s a very fascinating topic I think I’ll continue to come back to on this channel.
@@thesolipsistcinemathanks and I disagree with killing for more reasons than the one I mentioned have a good day
I have a huge issue with that. Criminals have proven throughout history that they can't be held. No matter how tight the prison is, no matter how much surveillance. They will keep leaving, whether you want to argue for the child's sake or not isn't relevant due to the amount for lives they would take because of the inability to put them down. True, a child doesn't need to lose a parent, but what about the other people who lost a loved? Yeah... no