Digital Wireless mics compared | Shure vs Audio-Technica vs Sennheiser | GLXD vs EW D1 vs System 10

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 дек 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @echoems
    @echoems 4 года назад +1

    i'm quite bothered by the handling noise on the audio technica, but how was it in actual use? i'm considering this as my first wireless mic for church and other singing events.

  • @trungdo6852
    @trungdo6852 3 года назад

    Can you please tell me where is each of these microphones made? Thank you very much

  • @LoveMoneySecretsTV
    @LoveMoneySecretsTV 4 года назад +2

    Shure. GLXD 2. at 6:55 min. runs 12 to 14 hours on Shure proprietary battery ($30 approx) nice. Sounds from your review like it's a more temperamental mic. Nice to know what microphone your using Shure QLXD runs 400-500 GHz (10:14 ). at 21.34 he does comparison with each microphone

  • @kdsz944
    @kdsz944 Год назад +1

    58 is clearly the best one.Its mid range is what it makes it sound like a pro mic, while the rest are just hyped this or that way....

  • @manuelpenaruiz3694
    @manuelpenaruiz3694 4 года назад

    Audio quality: is there a significant difference between the QLXD and Sennheiser D1? Thanks

  • @ronnieparfait
    @ronnieparfait 3 года назад +2

    “Hey Biff, get a load of this guy’s life preserver, Dork thinks he’s gonna drown!”

  • @ReinaldoCrespo
    @ReinaldoCrespo 4 года назад +1

    You prefer your QLXD systems over these new Digital Microphones?

    • @tgbatg
      @tgbatg  4 года назад +3

      When possible, of course. As a FOH engineer, the QLXD system is the way to go. It has many high end features the 2.4GHz systems don't have. But it really depends on your use case. Some quick reasons why anyone should opt to get the QLXD over the 2.4 GHz systems: (1) working distance (2) need to run many channel simultaneously (2b) frequency coordination.

  • @pantanalordofdarkness9559
    @pantanalordofdarkness9559 2 года назад +3

    Not sure how well I can trust a reviewer being an expert on the subject matter when his own audio on the video is so low that you can't hear it.

  • @dyosaganda5648
    @dyosaganda5648 4 года назад +2

    Im using audiotechnica system10 and the sound is sow good..like sennheiser...👍☺💗💗💗

  • @curiouskims
    @curiouskims 4 года назад +1

    Great review!

  • @brucegarethgeorge
    @brucegarethgeorge 2 года назад

    The Audio Technica sounds better with speech. Less eq required. Vocals are clearer.

  • @Gmail4ChromeSettings
    @Gmail4ChromeSettings Год назад

    the sm58 head on the qlxd sounds better than the sm58 head on the glxd.

  • @djrez2107
    @djrez2107 3 года назад +2

    2.4ghz mics are the worse invention ever. I had one and they drop out like crazy.

  • @markhagopian3257
    @markhagopian3257 3 года назад +4

    Wish the poor guy knew how to turn his mic up enough to hear him.

    • @robertlawson1184
      @robertlawson1184 2 года назад +1

      wait what........ A person doing mics review that didnt set proper mic level for viewers? 🤔 So why should i trust this guy's reviews now? 🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣

    • @musicalpurpose2566
      @musicalpurpose2566 2 года назад

      You must have a cheap phone. I can hear him fine.

  • @MGort-bb8op
    @MGort-bb8op 4 года назад +2

    Dont by a 2,4GHz wireless microphone system.. even at 8m distance I get only dropouts..

  • @deanle604
    @deanle604 2 года назад

    Couldnt hear a dam thing what the heck you are saying. It is you call mic testing 😅😅😅

  • @Krthaspecialist
    @Krthaspecialist 3 года назад +1

    TOO LONG

  • @deanle604
    @deanle604 Год назад

    What the ffff are you reviewing…