This unlawful assult and tyrannical behavior committed by PC 1188 on yourself is on par with the recent atrocious assult committed by PC William Sampson on a 16 year old child. This situation appears to be racially motivated, abuse of police powers, and is totally unacceptable. It's apparent that PC 1188 got off touching you up, while it's sidekick stood idly by watching the assult unfold. This situation could have been avoided, and never should have progressed further than first contact. The gutless sidekick should have intervened, but no it was obedient and subservient to it's dominant male master. These miserable pair of unvirtuous, unethical sods are driven by their power tripping egos and have no moral compass whatsoever. Sir Auditing Britain, you prepared yourself well and can stand proud and tall. The muppets FAILED to ID you, they became annoyed and frustrated, spitting their dummies in the dirt. You gave them a well deserved and propper public lambasting, they can go to hell and hang their heads as they shuffle off on their walk of shame.
@BookkeeperBill Thank you sir. No matter how uncomfortable and confronting a situation we find ourselves in, it's always a pleasure for all involved to receive your support and for the time you take to share your highly valued thoughtful opinions with others.
This officer is DANGEROUS. He should be removed from the police service forthwith. He is a disgrace to the uniform. He had absolutely no rights to search this man whatsoever. Suspicion does not give him grounds to search this man. If he believes he has the right to search you based on terrorist activity then he has the worst judgement ever. This needs to be followed up. I applaud you for standing up to this tyrant and holding him accountable for his illegal actions.
You don't understand what reasonable grounds are and how easy it is to arrive at them. The courts uphold this sort of interpretation. I'm not staying it's correct I'm merely pointing out that the cops wouldn't act like this unless they were backed by the courts ...
I totally agree. The man came out and said he wasn’t agressive, this coller is a disgrace to wear the badge, he has no grounds to search this man. I hope this was taken further.
He articulated 2 premises as grounds for search under S43: filming a sensitive site, and refusing to give details. Filming is already precluded as grounds for suspicion by the ACPO guidelines; therefore, the 1st premise is invalid. Every court in the land has agreed that refusing to give details when not obliged to cannot be used as grounds for reasonable suspicion; therefore, the 2nd premise is also invalid. In conclusion, it was false imprisonment, illegal search, and assault.
the system will never stop protecting their own cronies. we need to find the places where they live and start sending them pizzas or amazon orders every single day, every single hour. Of course, the most direct and honest solution would just be violence.
Well put. Absolutely it was. Maybe the corrupt judges who back up such potato 🥔 heads, need audited, too. Especially coming out of their sex dungeons dominatrix's place. We'd get shit done, then.
Never tell any details to cops it gives them the right to conduct an unlawful arrest and beat people up which they actually do in this day and age, i personally wouldnt give them the time of day having been a victim myself of their bullying a couple decades ago it was downright disgusting what they did in my case
Marvelous to watch. Myself and my mates had crap like this all the time back in the day. Mobile phones and the Internet are a Godsend as people are a lot more clued up on everything nowadays and have the courage to stand up to authority. 10 out 10 again my mate. 👍
If in the future you if are searched unlawfully do not accept back any of your belongings but report them as stolen from you and see how they can answer this.
@@MultiGleni Lots of people have successfully sued the police for various things, unlawful detainment and searches being one of the most popular. It's a long process, but it does happen, and often ends in people getting a 4 figure sum at the end of it.
The weird thing is that millions of people every year take photos and footage of Buckingham palace which is private property The Queen doesn’t call the police at them
It’s also ironic that this happened outside a police training college where these 2 clearly need to attend and learn how to deal with law abiding subjects of the British empire. Their attitude is disgraceful.
The tyrant got butt hurt and the only way he could get petty revenge on you was to search and try to find your identity, that little girl he had with him was useless too!!! Who employs these goons???? make sure you sue them AB.
I'm six mins into this film and I stopped playing to write this. This pc clearly demonstrates why the police have such a bad reputation. This is pure fabrication and intimation. Shame on him. I'll watch the rest now....
The WPC has that expression on her face. "oh Christ he has dragged me into a situation where I am going to have to lie again to get him out of the shit"
A major problem is the passing of laws that then get abused and used as an excuse for unlawful and abhorrent conduct by the 'authorities'. Do terrorists usually conduct surveillance so overtly, and then go out of their way to draw attention to themselves by being abusive to security personnel? ( I know AB wasn't abusive but that was what the jumbo sausage used as an excuse for reasonable suspicion) This video is why it should not come as a surprise that we have so many conspiracy theorists spouting false flag attack scenarios.
In England, Wales and N.Ireland, Police Officers are crown agents. They do what the Queen's legislation tells them to do. As it is other Crown agents who investigate, Crown agents are free to break the law and abuse their positions. In Scotland we have Constables who are public servants. They combine these duties with their duties as Crown Agents. Often they will abandon their public duty to uphold the law and commit a common law offence in order to enforce legislation. I now deduct the portion of council tax I pay for policing. I tell the council I'm not paying for a service from an organisation I believe to be corrupt. I suggest we all withdraw funding until they stop being an organised crime gang.
There corporate. A corps. Until you arm yourself to prove your a man, alive! By your creditors account then they can not touch you in anyway unless you murder, steal or trespass on or against any body. Gods commandments and gave you Dominion for man on this planet. Your standing at this point is you are acting out your straw man, a corpseration. You are dead!! Lost at sea! You have no rights under maritime law. Only privileges. Fuck the crown!! They have broken all oaths against God and people
What a pair of bullies these two are, sad they don't recognise the reason for their powers and use them accordingly in the situation they are meant for.
The complaint must be made to the Warickshire professional standards dept it is they who investigate 'procedure' complaints the IPCC only investigate the more serious incidents. In this particular incident it is all captured on video and to be honest the officers were caught abusing their powers, telling out and out lies, etc etc and I am aware of officers being sacked for less than this. The senior officers ought to be made aware of this incident so they can see for themselves what these officers said and did. Extremely unprofessional and this video should be used as a training video for other officers on "how not to do it", after all it took place outside Ryton on Dunsmore which is one of the main police training schools. Maybe they should have an hours lecture on "Public Photography " to stop this type of thing happening and educate the new recruits.
You should wear special clothes that have a locked pocket, and one pocket only. So they struggle with one pocket, and one pocket is all they have to do. Most stupid search ever 😂
@Smokeango I totally agree with your clearly learned point, but for the sake of argument, don't you think the crux of the case rests on what was "reasonable suspicion" I can't remember if it's an objective or subjective test, and in pretty sure there will be a seminal authority covering entirely these circumstances. I might have to research.
@@ThisDJ808 Hello...section 47A for that designated area by not lower than rank of Inspector and to send a message to the Home secretary as soon as possible section 43A = Search of vehicles ...…………… (reasonable suspicion & grounds) section 43= Search of persons...………... (reasonable suspicion & grounds)
Jesus Christ.. I'm from Ireland 🇮🇪 and even I know they can no longer search under terrorist legislation without being able to articulate the exact suspicion of a crime
When he tried to explain the grounds for the search he mentioned you failing to ID and so pretty much admitted that his intent was to violate your right to anonymity. Was anything ever done about this?
@@kvgkumul You do not have to provide your identity to a police officer just because they ask you - unless you have committed a crime. You have the right to go about your business without being harassed by the police.
Can someone explain to PC1461 what protective gloves are for? In 8:05 he takes not clean bills and coins in hers hand and in 12:11 she pushes finger straight to eye...
'Give me your details! No! TERRORIST!' An all-too-common scenario. If this criminal genuinely thought you were a terrorist BEFORE his illegal search, exactly what was it that allayed his fears AFTER he had carried out his illegal search? The fact that this petty bully was satisfied that you were not a "terrorist" after illegally searching you and finding NOTHING proves that he never actually suspected you in the first place. You - legally and rightly - said "No" to him and he didn't like that, so he suddenly played the terrorism card in order to get your ID. When that failed the lying little shit knew he was beaten, so stopped trying. An HONEST suspicion with nothing useful either way found in a search would have lead to arrest and further investigations to establish your identity. Please, PLEASE, follow up on your threat to sue them. Contacting CRIMEBODGE would be a great first step. Keep up the good work. 🍌👍
From what I have been told from a good source this incident has become an embarrasment to the Warwickshire police.Right outside the police training college in Ryton warwickshire.
At 2:42 PC1461 clearly states "He's (security) just said, he said that you haven't been aggressive". At 5:55 PC1188 clearly cites a reason for the detention and search as "we've been told that you've been aggressive at this site..." This allegation had already been confirmed (by PC1461) to be a false allegation. That fact alone is reason enough to prove this to be an unlawful detention and search.
don't waste your time with a complaint , go straight for a lawsuit, your a slam dunk win on this 1. no grounds for a search and miss use of sec 43. you have grounds here to sue both the police and the individual
@@AJ-yt5rw You must be the blue costumed clown who searched him. I have came to this conclusion on the basis you make a lot of claims with no objective facts to back them up. All you have is subjective opinion, just like most blue costumed clowns!
@@AJ-yt5rw legal activity practiced lawfully is not and can not be deemed suspicious, nor is it baiting. We have civil rights, the police enforce them. What this officer did here is unlawful. They have a SOP they are trained to follow and he wasn't interested in following it. If the police force operates like this unchecked it is nazi germany im afraid.
@@AJ-yt5rw I'm afraid that you are completely wrong in your assessment of what happened here ! A.B. was not 'baiting' anyone . What he was doing is totally legal / lawful . Are you aware of the Met Police memo relating to photography ? This was re-iterated in ( I believe 2018) ?..... Yet these tyrants STILL behave like this ! Who gives a shit whether it's a 'sensitive' site or not ?.....The fact is that A.B. wasn't doing anything covert or threatening , therefore the fat cop was mis-using sec 43.....AND he knows he was ! Needs suing to the fullest extent possible....see if he appreciates his wrongdoing when he's hit in the pocket personally..... These moronic 'security' and especially the police bring this upon themselves......are they EVER going to learn ??
@@AJ-yt5rw legal activity practiced lawfully can not deemed suspicious. The fact they are both legal and lawful means it can not be suspicious. In your example of 5 hours outside a home that could fall into a stalking or harassment issue but would be near impossible for police to prove the intent. Security cameras film 24 hours a day even on domestic property and they are legally allowed to. He wasn't there for that long im guessing and even if he was it is both legal and lawful to do so. Suspicious is not a crime as it is subjective
@Paul Mulholland Exactly. And it's not a Prohibited Place within the meaning of the Official Secrets Act. either Another Common Purpose-trained plod if ever there was one.
This officer is DANGEROUS. He should be removed from the police service forthwith. He is a disgrace to the uniform. He had absolutely no rights to search this man whatsoever. Suspicion does not give him grounds to search this man. If he believes he has the right to search you based on terrorist activity then he has the worst judgement ever.As a retired Police a Officer, even I know that you have to have more than just suspicion under the Terrorism Act. You must have strong grounds to search, not just because someone if filming. If this male had camouflage clothing and hid in a bush opposite the entrance, then yes, you have reasonable suspicion that he is a terrorist. Hope you made an official complaint, In fact, I think it took a long time for all this support from other auditors, because AB deserves this more incisive support a long time ago. I follow him since he had a little more than 2 thousand subscribers. In February he had 10k subscribers, since then he has been gaining 6k subscribers every month, this is quite impressive. It deserves all the respect and thanks of all, for fighting against tyrants who try to threaten the people's freedom.
Definitely. The trouble with the police (well most humans), is that their egos prevent them from admitting they are wrong. They have to 'win' ahead of actually doing the right thing. He obviously searched you to obtain power over you. It's like when traffic cops stop someone mistakenly and have to find something trivial wrong with your car just to keep face.
You handled them exactly how you should of and I really hope you do sue them for their unlawful search using the terrorism act. They didn't have reasonable grounds to suspect you are a terrorist, in order for them to have grounds they would need some kind of evidence that you are engaged in terroristic activities and being that public photography is not a crime and they had absolutely no evidence to suggest you were engaged in hostile reconnaissance the search was unlawful in my opinion, Suspicion is just an opinion and not a crime or grounds. The police cannot just walk up to people taking picture and quote the terrorism act at them in order to search them. That's like stopping a jogger and searching him because he was running down the street. They swore an oath to protect your human rights but violated them instead.
i just get annoyed that this is no more than having a grumble about corrupt cops. He won the day and that was because he could not get you to identify, so he changed tactic and made it about terrorism, when will everybody learn, it is all about stamping their authority in ever encounter with the public, by the way, they cannot search you for a crime retrospectively, they only mentioned terrorism much later
Once they quote the terrorism act, they leave themselves open to action. If they quote it, simply ask them to provide written and signed authorisation from an assistant chief constable or a rank above that, stating that particular geographical area had been designated as an area under threat of terrorism. Such a designation is only valid for a period of 24 hours and then needs to be reissued. If they produce such a document, obey their orders. If not and they still continue to act as these officers do, they are committing a criminal act. sue them.
"It is a sensible area" - That's why they have built a nice fence - everybody can see through - instead of a tall wall. And of course nowadays the terrorists have become so lazy, they film with easily noticable cameras in their hands, standing in front of the gate, willing to provoke a chit chat with the cops. Makes perfectly sense.
Those useless cops think they are above the law and do not care about being taken to court because the payouts come from us the taxpayers and not from their wages, they should be liable and fired from the force immediately.
Top class yet again, I’m working my way through all your videos, and not once have I been disappointed, you are absolutely brilliant at what you do xxx
They know exactly what your doing. Police need to make sure of what they can do surrounding the laws they enforce. Its ridiculous. It should also be a requirement for employment that they have more than 1 brain cell. Plus he did lie, I don't believe anyone said he was aggressive, even the security guard told him he wasnt
This unlawful assult and tyrannical behavior committed by PC 1188 on yourself is on par with the recent atrocious assult committed by PC William Sampson on a 16 year old child.
This situation appears to be racially motivated, abuse of police powers, and is totally unacceptable.
It's apparent that PC 1188 got off touching you up, while it's sidekick stood idly by watching the assult unfold.
This situation could have been avoided, and never should have progressed further than first contact.
The gutless sidekick should have intervened, but no it was obedient and subservient to it's dominant male master.
These miserable pair of unvirtuous, unethical sods are driven by their power tripping egos and have no moral compass whatsoever.
Sir Auditing Britain, you prepared yourself well and can stand proud and tall.
The muppets FAILED to ID you, they became annoyed and frustrated, spitting their dummies in the dirt.
You gave them a well deserved and propper public lambasting, they can go to hell and hang their heads as they shuffle off on their walk of shame.
PC Sampson? Another sexual assault dressed up as 'investigations'?
@@petrolhead7604 I haven't seen that video where can i find it or what do i type in to bring it up?
@@maverick4220 ruclips.net/video/nRrt-V8jLhY/видео.html but prepare yourself to be horrified, it's f**king brutal mate, poor kid
@BookkeeperBill
Thank you sir.
No matter how uncomfortable and confronting a situation we find ourselves in, it's always a pleasure for all involved to receive your support and for the time you take to share your highly valued thoughtful opinions with others.
@@richardtheeighth4431 I laughed at “16 year-old child“ though.
This officer is DANGEROUS. He should be removed from the police service forthwith. He is a disgrace to the uniform. He had absolutely no rights to search this man whatsoever. Suspicion does not give him grounds to search this man. If he believes he has the right to search you based on terrorist activity then he has the worst judgement ever. This needs to be followed up. I applaud you for standing up to this tyrant and holding him accountable for his illegal actions.
You don't understand what reasonable grounds are and how easy it is to arrive at them. The courts uphold this sort of interpretation. I'm not staying it's correct I'm merely pointing out that the cops wouldn't act like this unless they were backed by the courts ...
I totally agree. The man came out and said he wasn’t agressive, this coller is a disgrace to wear the badge, he has no grounds to search this man. I hope this was taken further.
This police need to Re-vatted 100%
Another Wayne Couzens in making.
@@kvgkumul ok " is that why A B has won all these unlawful search cases
He actually said on camera you hadn't committed a crime...this needs to go further....these are ROGUE coppers!!!
Have to disagree. The more of these videos I see the more I have to conclude that these are the actions of typical, not rogue coppers.
@@paullord3549 typical and rogue
A.B will be smiling from Ear to ear, More Cash in the bank.
She said the guards had not said he was aggressive.....
Cop : " Because I have the power " and that is exactly the problem and why they are hated.
In the country I live in, they don't like them either. The whole world doesn't like them.🌍
"We were told you were aggressive"
*ADMITTING he cant discern anyone's demeanor and is therefore unfit to be a police officer*
He articulated 2 premises as grounds for search under S43: filming a sensitive site, and refusing to give details.
Filming is already precluded as grounds for suspicion by the ACPO guidelines; therefore, the 1st premise is invalid.
Every court in the land has agreed that refusing to give details when not obliged to cannot be used as grounds for reasonable suspicion; therefore, the 2nd premise is also invalid.
In conclusion, it was false imprisonment, illegal search, and assault.
Exactly. Well said
Basics for drafting a Particular of Claim in a civil claim .
the system will never stop protecting their own cronies. we need to find the places where they live and start sending them pizzas or amazon orders every single day, every single hour.
Of course, the most direct and honest solution would just be violence.
Well put. Absolutely it was. Maybe the corrupt judges who back up such potato 🥔 heads, need audited, too. Especially coming out of their sex dungeons dominatrix's place. We'd get shit done, then.
Never tell any details to cops it gives them the right to conduct an unlawful arrest and beat people up which they actually do in this day and age, i personally wouldnt give them the time of day having been a victim myself of their bullying a couple decades ago it was downright disgusting what they did in my case
Suspicion of terrorism yer they send two unarmed, uneducated, untrained and uninformed constables. Amazing!
ha good point
Blue isis
@Smokeango thankyou for explaining yourself, it's nice to hear your feminine side coming out.
@Smokeango Where are the tasers?
@Smokeango I see no yellow tasers :-/
And how am I wrong? Even you admitted they stretched the law, to suit their agenda
Well done AB. I just did research on the Thin Blue Line badge and uncovered its sordid past. Thank you for raising this and educating the public.
Marvelous to watch. Myself and my mates had crap like this all the time back in the day. Mobile phones and the Internet are a Godsend as people are a lot more clued up on everything nowadays and have the courage to stand up to authority. 10 out 10 again my mate. 👍
🙏🏼
@@AuditingBritain
When she handed you back your money you should've said: keep it, you'll need it after I sue you...
If in the future you if are searched unlawfully do not accept back any of your belongings but report them as stolen from you and see how they can answer this.
Very last sentence of PACE states that a person who refuses to give his detailes cannot be deemed as suspicious by police.
The cop literally said we’re looking for anything terrorism related but never actually says anything specific of what may be a terrorist related items
I used to be pro police but this has changed my opinion.
AB, I wish you'd give us updates on these lawsuits.
Sue them. He broke the law by using an unlawful search.
He clearly knows that as he said it.
Gwildor saying something and doing something are two different things. Confirmation is just friendly advice but thanks for your input.
@@SammyInnit No problem.
sue them? that would be possible on a ideal world. they are corrupt as fuck and will get away with it.
@@MultiGleni Lots of people have successfully sued the police for various things, unlawful detainment and searches being one of the most popular. It's a long process, but it does happen, and often ends in people getting a 4 figure sum at the end of it.
The weird thing is that millions of people every year take photos and footage of Buckingham palace which is private property The Queen doesn’t call the police at them
And Japanese tourists versus big Ben and house of lords
Indeed so interesting that 🤔🤔🤔
It's not private property. Its owned by taxpayers
Seriously? Cameras everywhere. The Queen doesn't have to call. Candid Camera. Smile. Your face is on file.
@@michaelbrown1659 She owns half the wold you numnut.. She's not the queen for nothing...
AB ALWAYS WINS 💯💪
I really hope you follow through on this, that tyrant needs to be stop. He’s gonna hurt somebody if he hasn’t already
Disgusting. Using “powers” to mend their hurt egos that you didn’t bow at their feet like a good little citizen.
His behaviour was so terroristic in nature that we left him to continue after not being able to find out his name...
RUclips gold auditing Britain hope this goes viral
Nice one AB keep exposing these dirty oath breakers.
👍
I would really love an update on various cases against these people
It’s also ironic that this happened outside a police training college where these 2 clearly need to attend and learn how to deal with law abiding subjects of the British empire. Their attitude is disgraceful.
this is scary because the way these cops act when there on camera how do u think they act off camera
Yes thats worrying.
Big facts
Have you had any success with suing the officers? Thanks
Is there any updates on this illegal detainment
They searched him, harassed him & bullied him for something that they still couldn't stop him from doing in the end anyway!!!!
Now that is true terrorism right there. 💯
That male officer made my blood boil what an absolute tyrant
Happens a lot and sadly some don't even get a reason to why they are getting searched
They get away with blue murder
I laugh every time when they get their notebooks out when we know full well they won't be getting any details!!
They might be doodling🤣🤣🤣
I want AB offer to model for them if they want to sketch him😀
It to look at pictures
😂😂😂😂😂
The tyrant got butt hurt and the only way he could get petty revenge on you was to search and try to find your identity, that little girl he had with him was useless too!!! Who employs these goons???? make sure you sue them AB.
'I was on my way home' while looking at the floor all suspicious, this officer straight up lied about why he was supposedly handcuffed by police.
We need more people like you to keep a eye on the police
I'm six mins into this film and I stopped playing to write this. This pc clearly demonstrates why the police have such a bad reputation. This is pure fabrication and intimation. Shame on him. I'll watch the rest now....
Yes, these two earned the hate today.
The police are brainwashed to think this way, the beauty of this channel is how educational it is through observation
The WPC has that expression on her face. "oh Christ he has dragged me into a situation where I am going to have to lie again to get him out of the shit"
remember, THE PROBLEM IS NOT CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, THE PROBLEM IS CIVIL OBEDIENCE.
A major problem is the passing of laws that then get abused and used as an excuse for unlawful and abhorrent conduct by the 'authorities'.
Do terrorists usually conduct surveillance so overtly, and then go out of their way to draw attention to themselves by being abusive to security personnel? ( I know AB wasn't abusive but that was what the jumbo sausage used as an excuse for reasonable suspicion)
This video is why it should not come as a surprise that we have so many conspiracy theorists spouting false flag attack scenarios.
I like that - hope you don't mind me using it
@@jamessparkes5516 The more that do, the better.
Straight up!
So populist, so wrong. Anarchism does not work. Use reason instead.
'I decide what i do'
And that attitude is the problem. They should be doing what the TAX PAYERS decide they do. Being public servants and all...
In England, Wales and N.Ireland, Police Officers are crown agents. They do what the Queen's legislation tells them to do. As it is other Crown agents who investigate, Crown agents are free to break the law and abuse their positions. In Scotland we have Constables who are public servants. They combine these duties with their duties as Crown Agents. Often they will abandon their public duty to uphold the law and commit a common law offence in order to enforce legislation. I now deduct the portion of council tax I pay for policing. I tell the council I'm not paying for a service from an organisation I believe to be corrupt. I suggest we all withdraw funding until they stop being an organised crime gang.
There corporate. A corps. Until you arm yourself to prove your a man, alive! By your creditors account then they can not touch you in anyway unless you murder, steal or trespass on or against any body. Gods commandments and gave you Dominion for man on this planet.
Your standing at this point is you are acting out your straw man, a corpseration. You are dead!! Lost at sea! You have no rights under maritime law. Only privileges.
Fuck the crown!! They have broken all oaths against God and people
"People lie to us all the time ", but he was still will to take the word of the security guard that AB had been agressive.
One thing is appreciated: officer agrees recording to continue while searching.
What a pair of bullies these two are, sad they don't recognise the reason for their powers and use them accordingly in the situation they are meant for.
Make an official complaint these officers have abused their powers, these officers should not have done what they did. Please please make a complaint.
Agreed. Terrorism Act, too...nice!
I agree
IPCC won't do anything. Only legal actions matters to them
The complaint must be made to the Warickshire professional standards dept it is they who investigate 'procedure'
complaints the IPCC only investigate the more serious incidents. In this particular incident it is all captured on video and to be honest the officers were caught abusing their powers, telling out and out lies, etc etc and I am aware of officers being sacked for less than this. The senior officers ought to be made aware of this incident so they can see for themselves what these officers said and did. Extremely unprofessional and this video should be used as a training video for other officers on "how not to do it", after all it took place outside Ryton on Dunsmore which is one of the main police training schools. Maybe they should have an hours lecture on "Public Photography " to stop this type of thing happening and educate the new recruits.
Another great educational upload Ab. Hope you went back again again. Well done.
I am completely disgusted with these idiots who get paid with our taxes
This policeman is stepping up with his ego I am surprised at the way he’s dressed addressing members of the public he’s had too many doughnuts
I'm no gym-goer, but have they dropped the fitness test for police now?
Fitness test is so easy.
The bleep test pass level is laughable.
Yes.when they let women in.
I thought that copper would have passed the fatness test with flying colours
Level 5 bleep test now. Used to be level 10.
Yeah I believe so, on the grounds of anti discrimination, um larg ism is included,
AB you were outstanding. Brilliant. Excellent.
You should wear special clothes that have a locked pocket, and one pocket only. So they struggle with one pocket, and one pocket is all they have to do.
Most stupid search ever 😂
They never had reasonable grounds, end of. These clowns get more pathetic by the day.
The power to stop and search someone under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 no longer exists.
It's now s43A I think and it can only apply at designated areas, or on the authority of a senior officer
@Smokeango Are you the officer in this video trying to defend your unlawful actions?
Sue them
@Smokeango I totally agree with your clearly learned point, but for the sake of argument, don't you think the crux of the case rests on what was "reasonable suspicion" I can't remember if it's an objective or subjective test, and in pretty sure there will be a seminal authority covering entirely these circumstances. I might have to research.
@@ThisDJ808 Hello...section 47A for that designated area by not lower than rank of Inspector and to send a message to the Home secretary as soon as possible
section 43A = Search of vehicles ...…………… (reasonable suspicion & grounds)
section 43= Search of persons...………... (reasonable suspicion & grounds)
Ask for the caller recording and if its a false report sue them.
AB , Sir you are best of all the time . can't wait to get your audit , keep it up
Jesus Christ.. I'm from Ireland 🇮🇪 and even I know they can no longer search under terrorist legislation without being able to articulate the exact suspicion of a crime
When he tried to explain the grounds for the search he mentioned you failing to ID and so pretty much admitted that his intent was to violate your right to anonymity.
Was anything ever done about this?
what is this right to anonymity you speak about ?
The right to refuse to give your details just because the filth would like them
@@kvgkumul You do not have to provide your identity to a police officer just because they ask you - unless you have committed a crime. You have the right to go about your business without being harassed by the police.
Yes, it is actually retaliation for not be an obedient bootlicker.
@@kvgkumul its default.
Can someone explain to PC1461 what protective gloves are for? In 8:05 he takes not clean bills and coins in hers hand and in 12:11 she pushes finger straight to eye...
I enjoy a lot watching tath! Every night to sleep… i love it
'Give me your details! No! TERRORIST!' An all-too-common scenario.
If this criminal genuinely thought you were a terrorist BEFORE his illegal search, exactly what was it that allayed his fears AFTER he had carried out his illegal search?
The fact that this petty bully was satisfied that you were not a "terrorist" after illegally searching you and finding NOTHING proves that he never actually suspected you in the first place. You - legally and rightly - said "No" to him and he didn't like that, so he suddenly played the terrorism card in order to get your ID. When that failed the lying little shit knew he was beaten, so stopped trying. An HONEST suspicion with nothing useful either way found in a search would have lead to arrest and further investigations to establish your identity.
Please, PLEASE, follow up on your threat to sue them. Contacting CRIMEBODGE would be a great first step.
Keep up the good work.
🍌👍
OMG!!! He found papers with the Queen's Name on it. He said that that would be evidence of terrorism and he missed it!
Please publish the outcome. Did you sue?
How much compensation did you receive and what was the outcome of their disciplinary?
From what I have been told from a good source this incident has become an embarrasment to the Warwickshire police.Right outside the police training college in Ryton warwickshire.
These muppets are a disgrace, there actions are totally unprofessional.
@Daniel O'Sullivan predictive text, too much time on your hands, get a grip.
Like 95% of the fuzz
What's "fuzz" it reminds me of the movie 'hot fuzz" ?
Bald headed tyrant abusing his powers. This will be the highlight of his career, a story to entertain his grandchildren with.
When they talking at the end they probably thinking we might if made a mistake and could be getting into trouble 😂😂
At 2:42 PC1461 clearly states "He's (security) just said, he said that you haven't been aggressive".
At 5:55 PC1188 clearly cites a reason for the detention and search as "we've been told that you've been aggressive at this site..." This allegation had already been confirmed (by PC1461) to be a false allegation. That fact alone is reason enough to prove this to be an unlawful detention and search.
Do not see them as police officers but sue them as human beings. It's a lot more satisfying.
Human is a fiction.
The color of Man.
As statutes are the color of law.
Don’t harm his “Sensitive site”. 😂. Every time you hear that, think of it in a Bodily form, it’s make’s in funnier!
Did you manage to get some compensation for this one ? Love the videos I’m learning a lot about my rights!!!
it's time for some follow ups to these videos AB.. I want to see these tyrants held accountable. That would make my day!!
Keep up the good work ❤
Press charges 100%,,your case is open and shut via the video evidence,,so many laws and policies broken there bro.
I really wish AB would sue every unlawful search then they might get the message
I like how everyone ignored the police woman, every time she talked.
She was just stood at the back talking rubbish to herself.
Almost always that is the case. The women are there only for the numbers
Every blogger in the UK should pay this site a visit
I find that cop suspicious of not passing a fitness test for the last 5 years at least. also that woman is a numpty.
@@themagicroundabout2528 😂
@@themagicroundabout2528 reminds me of Farva from super troopers
even his eyes are fat
😂😂😂😂
@@AuditingBritain YO AB!
Live you AB! ❤
Keep exposing these thick tyrannical plods..
AB did you sue them or was this before your legal team in place
"Do the search record, I'm going to continue recording!" Brilliant!
I was being aggressive to who?
There isn't anybody here! Just cows and a lamppost!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Comedy GOLD 😂😂😂😂
Garry Wormington just like Alan Partridge.
What happened after, did you sue ??
Lol. That cop blinked when you said he won't find an I'd.
don't waste your time with a complaint , go straight for a lawsuit, your a slam dunk win on this 1. no grounds for a search and miss use of sec 43. you have grounds here to sue both the police and the individual
Private Prosecution
www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-prosecutions
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/2/section/26/enacted
@@AJ-yt5rw You must be the blue costumed clown who searched him. I have came to this conclusion on the basis you make a lot of claims with no objective facts to back them up. All you have is subjective opinion, just like most blue costumed clowns!
@@AJ-yt5rw legal activity practiced lawfully is not and can not be deemed suspicious, nor is it baiting. We have civil rights, the police enforce them. What this officer did here is unlawful. They have a SOP they are trained to follow and he wasn't interested in following it. If the police force operates like this unchecked it is nazi germany im afraid.
@@AJ-yt5rw I'm afraid that you are completely wrong in your assessment of what happened here ! A.B. was not 'baiting' anyone . What he was doing is totally legal / lawful . Are you aware of the Met Police memo relating to photography ? This was re-iterated in ( I believe 2018) ?..... Yet these tyrants STILL behave like this ! Who gives a shit whether it's a 'sensitive' site or not ?.....The fact is that A.B. wasn't doing anything covert or threatening , therefore the fat cop was mis-using sec 43.....AND he knows he was ! Needs suing to the fullest extent possible....see if he appreciates his wrongdoing when he's hit in the pocket personally..... These moronic 'security' and especially the police bring this upon themselves......are they EVER going to learn ??
@@AJ-yt5rw legal activity practiced lawfully can not deemed suspicious. The fact they are both legal and lawful means it can not be suspicious. In your example of 5 hours outside a home that could fall into a stalking or harassment issue but would be near impossible for police to prove the intent. Security cameras film 24 hours a day even on domestic property and they are legally allowed to. He wasn't there for that long im guessing and even if he was it is both legal and lawful to do so. Suspicious is not a crime as it is subjective
If the site is that much of a "Sensitive site", then why don't they have screens up covering the fences to hinder photography?
Paul Mulholland that and don’t put up a large sign at the front gate saying what the site is
Better still move it to an even more remote site and build a 200 foot wall around it..😀
@Paul Mulholland Exactly. And it's not a Prohibited Place within the meaning of the Official Secrets Act. either Another Common Purpose-trained plod if ever there was one.
Everyone coming and going will have to be smuggled out under a blanket.
True,,,build a wall
Well done mate more good work, best auditor out ther, boils blood without even trying class haha, keep it up A.B lad stay safe bro 👍
🤛
Just file a complaint. Please... They need to learn a lesson.
They totally profiled you! ‘Foreign’ accent + ignorant officers = they go into panic mode....
Yes that is exactly what they did.
@Sh3p 83 very true
This is a job for "Crimebodge"!Rob loves dealing with this stuff,,,,,!
Smoke & Mirrors crimebodge will have a hard on way this video 🤪
Gotta love the Bodge!
This officer is DANGEROUS. He should be removed from the police service forthwith. He is a disgrace to the uniform. He had absolutely no rights to search this man whatsoever. Suspicion does not give him grounds to search this man. If he believes he has the right to search you based on terrorist activity then he has the worst judgement ever.As a retired Police a Officer, even I know that you have to have more than just suspicion under the Terrorism Act. You must have strong grounds to search, not just because someone if filming. If this male had camouflage clothing and hid in a bush opposite the entrance, then yes, you have reasonable suspicion that he is a terrorist. Hope you made an official complaint, In fact, I think it took a long time for all this support from other auditors, because AB deserves this more incisive support a long time ago. I follow him since he had a little more than 2 thousand subscribers. In February he had 10k subscribers, since then he has been gaining 6k subscribers every month, this is quite impressive. It deserves all the respect and thanks of all, for fighting against tyrants who try to threaten the people's freedom.
her face said it all knew he was wrong and didn't intervene
The only reason they searched you was to obtain your identity
One reason never to carry it.
Bang on mate.. Search didn't take too long did it? Wonder if that's because he couldn't find your wallet lol.. Only thing he was looking for was ID
It’s all bullshit
Agree
Definitely. The trouble with the police (well most humans), is that their egos prevent them from admitting they are wrong. They have to 'win' ahead of actually doing the right thing. He obviously searched you to obtain power over you. It's like when traffic cops stop someone mistakenly and have to find something trivial wrong with your car just to keep face.
You handled them exactly how you should of and I really hope you do sue them for their unlawful search using the terrorism act. They didn't have reasonable grounds to suspect you are a terrorist, in order for them to have grounds they would need some kind of evidence that you are engaged in terroristic activities and being that public photography is not a crime and they had absolutely no evidence to suggest you were engaged in hostile reconnaissance the search was unlawful in my opinion, Suspicion is just an opinion and not a crime or grounds. The police cannot just walk up to people taking picture and quote the terrorism act at them in order to search them. That's like stopping a jogger and searching him because he was running down the street. They swore an oath to protect your human rights but violated them instead.
i just get annoyed that this is no more than having a grumble about corrupt cops. He won the day and that was because he could not get you to identify, so he changed tactic and made it about terrorism, when will everybody learn, it is all about stamping their authority in ever encounter with the public, by the way, they cannot search you for a crime retrospectively, they only mentioned terrorism much later
You made need to help him.
Once they quote the terrorism act, they leave themselves open to action.
If they quote it, simply ask them to provide written and signed authorisation from an assistant chief constable or a rank above that, stating that particular geographical area had been designated as an area under threat of terrorism.
Such a designation is only valid for a period of 24 hours and then needs to be reissued.
If they produce such a document, obey their orders.
If not and they still continue to act as these officers do, they are committing a criminal act.
sue them.
Private Prosecution
www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-prosecutions
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/2/section/26/enacted
Right on PINACI!!!! 💕💕💕
Rugby Police Station? What a coincidence! His head looks just like a rugby ball!
They violate people's rights like this, and then they don't know why people hate them.
"It is a sensible area" - That's why they have built a nice fence - everybody can see through - instead of a tall wall.
And of course nowadays the terrorists have become so lazy, they film with easily noticable cameras in their hands, standing in front of the gate, willing to provoke a chit chat with the cops. Makes perfectly sense.
but Buckingham Palace isnt? People video and take pictures there every day.
Sensible?
Omg my blood is boiling what a pair of unprofessional goons
yeah, I got angry watching this
@@jamessparkes5516 i bet they BOTH have gotten raises & promotions since this video
Those useless cops think they are above the law and do not care about being taken to court because the payouts come from us the taxpayers and not from their wages, they should be liable and fired from the force immediately.
7:52 like someone is just carrying around a list of terrorists names in their pocket 🤣🤣
Top class yet again, I’m working my way through all your videos, and not once have I been disappointed, you are absolutely brilliant at what you do xxx
Mags Maggie your doing great AB is one of the best
Absolute thuggery, these officers should be in front of a judge.
You can record anyone and anything from a public place. Period.
They know exactly what your doing. Police need to make sure of what they can do surrounding the laws they enforce. Its ridiculous. It should also be a requirement for employment that they have more than 1 brain cell. Plus he did lie, I don't believe anyone said he was aggressive, even the security guard told him he wasnt
Oooh, get back in that College now and learn the law!
Grim Prawn
The auditor should have told the officer acting like a criminal that!😂😂😂
"There's cows over there!" 🤣🤣🤣
"It's not what we do at all"
(Violate peoples' rights)
*Literally just did it so many times on camera*