HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- We continue in our verse by verse Bible study through the Book of Daniel on Sunday Mornings with Pastor Gino Geraci at Calvary South Denver in Littleton CO. This week we look at Daniel 11:21-35 in a sermon called “The Evil Syrian King.”
The King’s Craftiness (vv.21-23)
The King’s Conquests (v.24)
The King’s Confrontations (vv.25-30)
The King’s Cruelty (vv.31-35)
If this message has bless you please give a LIKE make the word be spread
The guy scares me ,,because the interpretation is not about antiochus of epiphanies! Jesus in Matthew 24:15 tells you to understand this. Antiochus epiphanes ,(was passed 190 years,) when Jesus spoke those words!!!
The book of Daniel was included in the Septuagint in around 300 BC. So it had to have been completed before then.
Hi. What have you been up to lately?
Even the world's most famous Bible sceptical scholar - Bart Ehrman - admits that some parts of the book of Daniel describe the actions of Antiochus Epiphanes IV(!) However, Bart Ehrman does not believe in the paranormal/supernatural and he cannot accept the idea that the book of Daniel predicted the coming of Antiochus 300 years before he was born.
Yeah but the verses pertaining to Daniel 21- to the end. Is the description of Daniel 8 and Revelation 13. Which is the Antichrist at the end of time. The time-space he's giving to antiochus is wrong. !!!(Josephus says it's three years and six months)... and then the temple was already repaired. He's already not told you the correct time space ..... and the (agreement. At the end of verse 22 and beginning of 23. (Called the prince of the covenant)..... Is the same agreement as Daniel 9:27( for the Antichrist at the end of time)!!!. And when did antiochus epiphanes( ever divided the land for gain. ?(. And he never came in peaceably on the land!... If you noticed this guy will never do a verse by verse interpretation of this text. Because if he does he's going to destroy his own sermon!.
He says 15 acres ,but the Temple Mount is 37 acres.
Daniel 9:27....is speaking of the new covenant that Jesus Christ our promised Messiah confirms with many, for three and a half years of the seventieth week, (not as the unlearned, who give this covenant to the antichrist) from his anointing~baptism at the age of thirty, to his sacrifice and death, and resurrection when he was thirty three years of age, for the remission of sins.
By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament. [G1242]
{Hebrews 7:22}
But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, [G1242] which was established upon better promises.
{Hebrews 8:6}
For this is the covenant [G1242] that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; *I will put my laws* into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
{Hebrews 8:10}
For where a testament [G1242] is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
For a testament [G1242] is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.
{Hebrews 9:16-17}
For this is my blood of the new testament, [G1242] which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
{Matthew 26:28}
And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, [G1242] which is shed for many.
{Mark 14:24}
Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament [G1242] in my blood, which is shed for you.
{Luke 22:20}
Now of the things which we have spoken this is *the sum* We have such an high priest, (of the order of Melchizedek; chapter 7) who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty *in the heavens*
A minister of *the sanctuary* and of the true tabernacle, *which the Lord pitched and not man*
For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer.
(His life; "no greater love"...)
For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests [Levitical] that offer gifts according to the law:
Who serve unto the example and *shadow* of *heavenly things* as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make *the tabernacle* for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.
But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also *he* is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
For *finding fault with them* he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; *I will put my laws* into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
{Hebrews 8:1-10} (Jer 31:31-33)
But Josephus writing says it all happens in three-and-a-half years. Because Daniel 11 from 21 to the end is not about antiochus of epiphanies!( The prince of the covenant in verse 22-23 is the prince of the covenant( in verse Daniel 9:27). Same guy!
Sorry, to have to tell you this, but, the king of the south is not Egypt, nor is the king of the north, a Syrian.
If you listen carefully he makes antiochus of epiphanes (the King of the North.) And verse 21 says (according to this guy)... that is antiochus epiphanes.. so later on in the chapter. (Danielle 11 verse 40.)!. The King of the North is fighting antiochus of epiphanies. How does that work?😮. Because there's three kings there ..and he's only recognizing 2. And it's not about antiochus of epiphanies!
No prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
The 11th chapter of the book of Daniel is not a departure from the prophetic chain fround in that which is taught in the 2nd, the 7th, and the 8th chapters.
After this I saw in the night visions, and behold *a fourth beast* [Pagan Rome] dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.
I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another *little horn* before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the *eyes of man* and a mouth speaking great things.
{Daniel 7:7-8}
...
Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be *the fourth kingdom* upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.
And the ten horns *out of this kingdom* are ten kings that shall arise: and another [Papal Rome] shall rise *after* them; and he shall be diverse (claiming authority over church and state craft; the spiritual sword and the temporal sword) from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
(The Heruli 493 A.D.; The Vandals 534 A.D.; The Ostrogoths 538 A.D.)
And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and *think to change times and laws* and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
(Same dispensation of the time of the Gentiles; and the time of the two witnesses.)
But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away *his* dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.
{Daniel 7:23-26}
Even the world's most famous Bible sceptical scholar - Bart Ehrman - admits that some parts of the book of Daniel describe the actions of Antiochus Epiphanes IV(!) Even the world's most famous encyclopaedia - the Encyclopaedia Brittanica - admits that some parts of the book of Daniel describe the actions of Antiochus Epiphanes IV. But of course both Bart Ehrman & Brittanica assume Daniel was written after Antiochus came to power. If the book of Daniel was written in the 6th century BC and predicted the coming of Antiochus Epiphanes IV three hundred years before the guy was born. .then it really is ALL OVER for atheists.
It is antiochus fron verses 21-35. 36-45 is antichrist mirror prophecy. Jesus knew this. But the west is so BLIND.
@@jesusgeek7680 A sixth century BC book of Daniel would be FATAL to the anti-supernatural atheists. .that's why they are desperate to convince the world Daniel was written in the 2nd century BC.