Nuclear situation more dangerous than it was during Cold War? | DW News
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 авг 2024
- It's been 75 years since the US, Canada, and Western European countries forged an alliance to deter Soviet expansionism, keep peace in Europe and encourage European political integration. What began with just 12 members has now grown into an alliance of 32 nations.
Now, their leaders and partners are meeting in Washington for a summit, a lot is at stake: Supplying Ukraine with what it needs to fight off Russia's invasion will be top of the agenda. So once again NATO faces the question of how to contain Russia. But the big picture is more complicated now. Among other issues, leaders are seeking ways to push back against Russia, China, North Korea and Iran in the Indo-Pacific region.
00:00 The state of the world at stake?
04:03 Rose Gottemoeller, Former NATO Deputy Secretary-General
Subscribe: ruclips.net/user/deutsche...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
#NATO #Ukraine #Nuclear
Stop talking about if a famale or male is in charge, talk about what really matters
Who came with the questions about the gender had a brain fart and should get fired immediacy for incompetence. That was totally inappropriate.
This was exactly my thought! Absolutely ridiculous to divert such serious chat in this direction.
My concern is if NATO agreement keeps my country and Europe safe. I have zero interest in number of females in different positions. Safety is the priority.
I got pissed off at that moment and came into the comment section to see who else got worked up.
NATO really has other problems right now. No one cares if a role is filled by a man or a woman. What matters is that the person is competent.
Put women forced in positions causes very serious social problems
Poland's FM said at one point to Russia "Please, do not threat us with your nuke more often than once in 6 months because it is getting boring".
it would not be boring after the strike
@@kaltmorgen it must be as poor as russian army
@@Blanka1100 try it and then we will find out
@@Blanka1100 lil bro went full Russia derangement syndrome😂😂
Until it materializes...
Far from clever!
"If you want lasting peace, be prepared for war."
a slogan of people who would never learn to even use a pistol, never would allow a family member go near the warfront.
Good for politics
@@eklim2034 says the bot that refuses to go to Ukraine to help them fight and defend "democracy" 🤡
@@ayenia2736 A comment from someone that has more gun violence in his country than everywhere in the world.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
This is not new. And sadly it is always true.
NATO should renamed itself. Japan, south korea, philippines have defense treaty with members with NATO.
Hence why they are referred to as non-NATO allies
Yeah that’s the real issue lol
The reason of the war today : Ukraine wants to join NATO.
@@ronaldlalisan5592 the No Limits Treaty Organization or World Domination Treaty Organization
They are not part of NATO
😆Italy PM Meloni , don't want to have photo with the rest of G7 leader.
This is bad luck.
All of them will be gone 2025.
The lady's emphasis on NATO being coherent under the leadership of Joe Biden is impressive!
No doubt, Biden et al are spineless relics whove learned absolutely nothing from their respective failed policies. Putin acts with complete impunity, barks a few scary words and the civilized worlds politicians immediately clutch their pearls.
I lived through the cold war and have never felt more threatened.
Cuban missile crisis, "October 27, 1962, at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis, the American destroyer USS Beale began dropping depth charges on the nuclear-armed Soviet submarine B-59, which was lurking near the U.S. blockade line around Cuba. "
1979 NORAD Computer Glitch
1983 Nuclear False Alarm
November 1983 NATO war game nearly saw the United States and the Soviet Union come to blows.
I do NOT currently feel threatened at all. I am a US Army Vet. that was in Germany when the wall came down.
You should get out more.
Russian nuclear weapon must be as poor as russian army in Ukraine. Eastern Europeans are used to russian threats They are not afraid. You'd better start listening to them.
@@brand8590 exactly.
@@ragingmonk6080Exactly! Cold War was real, this is a joke!
For the 100th time. No future president can't withdraw from Nato. The house and senate pass it into law that the United States cannot withdraw from Nato at any given time. People really need to read more
It is a real pity that so many are blind and keep talking about Soviet days when they are already long over.
As long as Russia don't accept that, we can move on either. Europe did everything it could to move on, but Russia is stuck in the past.
They intentionally mix up Russia and the Soviet Union when they want to deceive their viewers.
@@mugenmugen9632 No it didn't. NATO didn't expand. It accepts members. The former Warsaw Pact countries where desperate to get in, because we knew that we will never be safe from Russia unless we did... and looking at the situation, we were 100% right
@@davidgreen5994or maybe its because of that the war started. I remember russia wanting to join NATO but was refused. This was a natural outcome.
@@mugenmugen9632 Nato does not expand by force unlike Warsaw pact. Contries apply to join because they know Russia and had no trust for a reason. Stop blaming a victim for her will to be secured and calling the police. Nato is an excuse for Russia, not a reason, Russia is always the same, Russia has a break sometimes. If Russia was a good neighbor, there would be no need to join nato. Finland joined Nato because Russia invaded non Nato country of Ukraine. Ukraine had no chance to join and Putin invaded it because he could.
Did any of those NATO country's get attacked? It's a defense Ally - right?
Exactly. NATO's biggest strength is deterrence. Most of NATO nations were attacked constantly prior to joining the alliance, but not since they joined. Which proves NATO fulfills its defensive role.
don't remember Libya attacking them first before they decided to destroy it.
@flopoz2575 also by fueling the conflict
@@flopoz2575 NATO is not about defense but offence where Western supremacy is threated.
Yes - Poland and Romania when Russian missiles entered their airspace and hit their territory a couple of times. Luckily for Russia, they didn't invoke Article 5.
Rch people live while everyone else dies
They wouldn't defend themselves... Most didn't last time, they cannot today.
Germans are the only country in Europe who is scared of RUS Nuc.
THAT should make us think about it. As the Baltics are even more in RUS focus than us.
Every sane person is afraid of nuclear weapons. You seem not to be one of them.
@@Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo Eastern Europeans are used to russian threats and they are not afraid. It is called own experience.
@@Blanka1100 The question was not Russian threats, but Russian (and US I might add) nuclear weapons. Accidents can happen. It's called common sense.
@@Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo it must be as poor as russian army in Ukraine. Putin loves his life and has no will to end it. Xi also opposed Putin here. It is so easy to make Germans (for example) scared.
@@Blanka1100 As I said, accidents can happen. The Doomsday Clock (which is not German, btw) is 90 seconds to midnight.
75 years from now, the world will not exist.
No, incorrect. The world we know will no longer exist in 75 years. But the world will continue to exist long after, and humans societies too.
World's gonna be fine. It's a big universe.
75 years from now, Russia will not exist. For the trollskies that's the whole world because they are not allowed to see anything else.
We are much closer to this day!
32 is not the final number of nations want badly to join Nato Alliance, NATO's door is wide open and there are nations out there who really wish to join the responsible club but they ain't mature enough to make hard decisions, get rid of absolute monarchy rule, make sincere political reforms includes fair and free elections!
Three simulated scenarios about nuclear safety: 1) Russia drops a nuclear bomb on Berlin 2) North Korea drops a nuclear bomb on Tokyo 3) China drops a nuclear bomb on Manila. Will these three scenarios have the same consequences?
What was "at stake" during Armenian Azarbajan war 1,2,3? Nothing. In Georga? Nothing. Balkan wars? Nothing. What, now, makes this so special?
Trump is not unpredictable, Trump tells the lie which suits him best ATM.
you need a bigger boat
Remember Ukraine ain't part of NATO
And never should be. We already have to deal with Orban, which is enough.
Nafo's Stoltenberg said Ukraine will bcome Nafo member around in 2056 😂😂😂😂 very very optimistic lmao
@@ragingmonk6080 The Ukrainians are the best soldiers in Europe, buy a country mile. Ben Hodges says they are most tech savvy, he has ever seen.
And?
@@freebolt5913 Ukraine has no professional soldiers. Several high ranking retired NATO officers have said the same thing. Ukraine has no competent Officers to give appropriate orders. Ukraine has no professional soldiers to carry out the orders if they received them.
"Respond to aggressor the language he can understand."
But then be prepared for his answer
The aggressor is NATO. Open your eyes.
@@VytautasLDK Don't be scared woot woot.
Serbia-humanitarian bombardment, Libya., Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, support of NeoNa.zi Bandera AZOV batalion... Breaching Minsk agreements....Did you men these answerst?
The answer came.
Do u think Putin wants to enjoy a post-nuclear Moscow? Even he knows that's not gonna be fun
NATO-US has to act decisively. Deterence of the Russian annexation that are running for decades now & that gas, grain, regional resources including lithium & nuke exploitation of Putin which has been the motivation for BRICKS trading.
Great interview, I'm glad you pressed her to get both sides of the coin.
Thank you
Short answer: no
Long answer: nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
NATO should stick to LGBTQ matters instead of attacking Russia.
Nato did not invade Russia. Russia invaded non Nato country.
cope rusbot
Do whatever you want NATO, just stay away from Asia
Wow, she actually claimed that NATO would lose its mission if the U.N. Charter were adhered to by everyone. Tell that to Libya and Serbia; Libya, being invaded by NATO and bombed in 2011 and Serbia being broken apart by NATO in 1999.
How about when russia bombarded Syria? You anti westerners always forget about that.
Stop War. Only Talk can Resolve things.
yes. but its difficult considering Zelensky is not ready to compromise losing land. And Russia doesn't want to look weak after being cornered. So the war goes on.
That’s true, but if you are being attacked, there is little less you can do. Right now, i don’t see a diplomatic solution possible in ukraine unless it cedes huge parts of his rightful territory which i doubt it will. And putin is all in in this, hood survival depends on it.
Um, how do you reason with someone who makes impossible demands?
Sometimes one has to lose to win at later stage
@@matsmcmatsWhy impossible? Russia has conquered these territories and is moving on. If Ukraine refuses Russia’s offer today, it will lose even more territories tomorrow.
Nope! Longest surviving military alliance (as well as economic+) is the alliance between England, Wales and Scotland. 300 years+.
Just like the "largest most successful single market in the world", is the US 50 states. Since 1776 baby.
And there's MOWA
Nop longest alliance is England and Portugal.
And the largest and successful single market in the world is the EU+EEA , 461 million consumers.
@@Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo "Successful" is not measured in population size or India and China would win it by default. Ridiculous.
@@brand8590 The population size is with regard to market size. You count market size in number of states which is ridiculous 🙂
But the EU is definitely more succesfull w r t safety and consumer protection, social welfare, income equality and healthcare access.
@@Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo Nonsense. Your example would mean that the EU at approx 500M vs the US at 350M, makes the US far more successful than Europe by any measurement. By multiples of times too.
The EU economy couldn't survive without the US market, especially the EU's #1 economy Germany.
Whereas with 80% of the US economy being based in North America and the 20% left is spread around the world. The US economy is ok without Europe.
In any way the US is more successful.
This is cold war, Dude.
Dumb PR talk, 15 minutes of nothing
Ukraine is Point of main concern for NATO
Russia is.
You want to retain a power also you have to face fight or war, who much is given much is require, NATO have to face it
Gladly im african no one is threatening us with nukes
Questions about NatO being a boys club… Please be more professional and ask actuall relevant questions that matter
Dear DW comment moderators! How are you today?
Any specific reason for keeping ru55ian trolls in comments thread?
Yessss DW has a problem with Russian bots I say it on every video
It's news to me that these comments are moderated at all in any capacity. But good on you for taking a positive tack.
About the possibility of a woman Secretary General of NATO, Liz Truss is available immediately. This position is usually reserved for former government leaders (Minister/Prime Minister) of member countries. Liz Truss was the PM of the UK, even if she didn't last in office as long as a head of lettuce.
God no! I couldn’t think of anyone worse.
@@anthonyhulse1248 I observe UK Politics from a long distance away, but I would say that BoJo would outrank Liz Truss in terms of ill-suitability for office (whatever it might be)!
Excellent interview, I learned some new things!
Why the gender issue is discussed
What about women in the armies? Why does only leadership positions matter? This is not equal.
There are women in the armies already since many years.
For one thing we all seen how big the US navy ship is...its probably the size of Isreal it self and u still dont want it because its a graphic equation that u should be on
No soviet now so no need to expand anymore
Russia did not turn into a peaceful neighbor so Nato exists for a reason
@@Blanka1100 It is she who is moving her military bases closer and closer🤣
@@VIRGILIY-o Because Russia gave countries around her good reasons to apply for Nato membership. It is not made by force unlike Warsaw pact. Other country's pact choice is none of Russia's decission. Get over it.
Myopic premise.
75 Years from now Humanity will not exist.
It’s unlikely it doesn’t exist, but there are good chances it’s I’m not in a great state.
😂😂 America have nuclear in Europe countries. So Russia have all the rights to use its Nuclear weapon.
Saar, your credit card information, saar! I need to to check now! Saar, give me your credit card information, my curry is very good.
"have" vs. "use" - do you spot a difference in your comment?
I am tired of old men and little kids making comments like these without using their brains @sridharkumar1802
@@acajoom ok grandpa
@@sridharkumar1802 oh you replied to me how cute.
My dog has a puffy tail ♥️
DW and this anchor are European CNN 🤢
Did you notice it too? Let's wait for November and then we'll see... 🤣
@@trumpforever6706😂 become fox
"Nuclear situation more dangerous than it was during Cold War?"
....
How is that in any shape or form a success?
The main point is as much as the US and USSR were paranoid, they were extremely rational and practical about MAD. This is not the case anymore with present day russian or north Korean leaders
@@enricogattone432 "Present day russian leader" has been there for 25 years.
@@urbansenicar81yes, as said after the cold war.
You've also attributed the change to current leaders of Russia and N. Korea, none of both have anything new in that regard.
@@urbansenicar81 they both have, indeed. One came to power after the very dissolution of the USSR. The other didn't have any nuclear weapons until around 2006. Current age. Nowadays. At present. In the latest years. Hope this clarified the meaning of the expression "present day".
Stop nagging about 'females'. If a woman appears to be the best choice, she will get the job. DEI undermines what we are entitled to expect from an organization, certainly one like NATO. And that is not getting into gender or identity politics.
Remove this lgbt interviewer from background
PHB
😁No worry , it's all about $ these days.
What if fab3000 just beat them not to mention the nukes china has the ship killers thats like Russia is a iOS 14 processor and china is like iphone 15 plus
"Is NATO still a boys club?"
Are women excluded from the draft.
We need equality
NATO is not only soldiers, soldiers need civilian infrastructur/industry to function. That said some NATO countries does not exclude women from the draft.
no, they are planning to Have zelensky inside nato.
The Netherlands has conscription* for women as well.
That said there is no active draft, so you're conscriptable on paper, but only if a mobilisation is declared. Actually I wouldn't even know my conscription number any longer since my service number was different.
I don't see any problem (I am sure it will affect me as well), but at this point it's both Russia and USA's fault and no one actually wants to stop it anyway. So, let it happen.
😢😢
DW, have you ever read the comments carefully? You will know the opinions of the majority of the world, not just blindly following the policies of America. Even though people watch DW, they do not believe that you report the news honestly.
Europeans don't' care what Chinese bots say.
Wumao.
in this capitalist world it is difficult to be indipendent and truthful.
A news organisation should report not analyse random bots comments.
Oh, yeah. The Internet where anybody can create 2000 anonymous accounts to write and upvote hundreds of comments daily does, of course, properly reflect the opinion of the world. Why wouldn't it? Who needs polls anyway when there's the Internet?! /s
nato trying to stop russia from geting bigger but nato trying to get bigger
Russia (Putin) is the one that made NATO great again. One world leader said NATO was brain dead and many others questioned the future of it until Putin declared his intentions to resurrect the Soviet Union. So your comment makes zero sense unless you're on the Kremlin kool aid.
Nato is not a country.
@@pdaniel8 countrys that are nato and trying to get ukraine in nato so it means trying to get bigger nato but russia say no
@@knowledge3563NATO does not force anyone to join. It is the countries that want to join to protect themselves from Russia.
@@knowledge3563 Ukraine's pact choice is none of Russia's decission. If Russia does not like Nato at her borders, Russia should stop giving countries like Ukraine good reasons to join. Nato does not expand by force, Russia does. Nato is not a reason for Putin to invade Ukraine. It is an excuse for Putin's greed. He wants Ukraine. He can invade non Nato neighbor only. Putin invaded uraine becaue he could and wanted to. He did ot care when Finland joined so Nato expansion is bs excuse. Ukraine is non Nato coutry and had zero chance to join in years to come because of its unsolved border issues.
SI VIVES EN EUROPA LO MEJOR QUE PUEDES HACER ES EMIGRAR A AUSTRALIA , ARGENTINA O CUALQUIER PAIS DE LATINOAMERICA . PAISES LIBRES Y NO LLEGARA LA CONTAMINACION DE LOS MISILES NUCLEARES QUE RUSIA YA TIENE APUNTANDO A LOS EUROPERROS.
🙏🌹🙏✝️✝️✝️
I think if western Europe looked like Gaza, y'all would learn to appreciate keeping your hands to yourselves.
You say this. But Europe was obliterated by WW2.
Its the whole reason Nato exists.
@@reubenmcmurray4377 Few people alive today remember that or even the aftermath.
Europe looked like Gaza x100 during WW2. You actually believe Gaza looked like the moon? Look at the nuclear explosions in Japan and tell me seriously that Gaza is the worst place bombed.
@@XMysticHerox Absolute nonsense. Forget the past and you get a repeat of history.
Europe did look like Gaza 75 years ago. Ever since it appreciated when countries just stick to their borders. Hence NATO.
😂😂😂😂
Rose Gottemoeller appraisal of Jo Biden is spot on.
Why only 2% you should be spending 50%
Is rose is lady boy ?
The proxy war in Ukraine is the first time NATO has tried to pick on someone their own size and NATO is getting humiliated
Since Russia started the war your comment makes no sense.
If that was true then NATO would have been at war for 800+ days and had zero losses. 😂 Not bad.
@@MrCleitustruth and the reality are very different in the east and "the global south" we all know the truth here, even India knows exactly how it is.
You don't really know what a proxy war is. Go read about it.
America should focus more on Air craft carriers since there hasn't been many technological changes since the battle of Midway.
Gangster.
Time to mark Atlantic Ocean boundaries!
Druva India is double standard. Playing with bricks and quad.
India intelligently looks after its interests, while Zelensky's Ukraine looks after its own and that of the West. The results are there for all to see.
Ukraine should be a neutral buffer state..
6:11 riiight. We're threatened by a world war, but THESE matters seem to be important to us. Pathetic.
NA GONE 😂😂😂
Modi went to Russia to once again convince Putin not to Nuke Ukraine.
No. He told Putin that he is happy that Russia attacked the children's hospital in Ukraine. He loves and admires pootin so much
India keep selling russian oil to europe and make big profit, war in europe is not indias problem
Nah, he went to Russia to beg for oil
russiane nuke must be as poor as russian army. Putin loves his luxury life and has no will to end it. Eastern Europeans are used to russian threats on ever other Monday. They are not afraid.
And indirectly west beg oil from India which is processed Russian oil
Yeah right leader's that can't even control there own countries little lone there kids 😂😂😂😂
Western World Order breaks, sob sob😢😂😂
Are you paying attention?
@@Bushodai are you crying too?
Long live LBGQ+.❤❤😂😂😂🎉🎉
Even if that was true, terrorism and genocide is not really an alternative to "Western world order".
THERE is not any word for peace all about power destruction women more Space etc, I think world Leaders should increase their Focus on peace
'To have peace, you need to prepare for war.'
@@davidgreen5994 Very complicated and perpetual
@@davidgreen5994 yeah, whatever life matter left after the nuclear exchage will gonna experience forever peace
NATO formed to maintaining peace ? I m done 😆
It does. Putin can invade non Nato country only. How "brave" of him.
@@Blanka1100 So lets call it a Putin's fear ..
@@sanjaysanj6688 Putin's paranoia and excuses. He wants Ukraine as a part of Russia. If Ukraine had been in Nato, he would have never started. He would have stayed inside russian borders.
@@Blanka1100 Nato and the United States can invade any country - unless it's Russia.It's also so brave🤣
@@VIRGILIY-o So Russia should stop talking about its security concerns. Nobody would invade a country like Russia as you said. Russia needs excuses, not a reason to invade non Nato neighbor and Putin wants Ukraine as a part of Russia. It is not about Nato at Russia's borders. It is about Putin's ego and legacy. He wants Ukraine.
Axis of Evil Summit👹👹
russia 🤍💙❤ has all the right to defend itself against the terest nato oraganization
Historians will look back and say how foolish NATO was to be so beligerent to think it can keep expanding. The world starting seeing NATO as a offensive/threat when it attacked Afganistan, Iraq, and Libya, it would have continued had Syria worked out.
Nato does not expand by force. Countries aply to join with their own free wil and if Russia was a good neighbor, there would be no need to join. Nato does not annex. Russia does. And nobody would invade Russia. Putn needs excuses, not a reason.
Europeans pay 💰 more, enlist your own people. The gravy s run out. ‘Merica!
agree entirely so tired of getting taxed to pay for Europe's defense.
@@reneprovosty7032 Europe is spending collectively over 400 billion dollars on defense. That's half US budget, in the conditions that we don't have global domination ambition like US, nor bases all over the world, and out single threat outside terrorism is Russia, with whom were were in good relationships until few years ago.
@@reneprovosty7032Are you soft in the head? You really think the American military is doing charity for Europe and it's not only thinking about their own gains? Why does the US have military bases in South America, Africa and Asia as well? You think it's charity? 🤡
The American military knows that unlike before WW2 when they were more isolated, it's best to be the top dog and stop others from getting big before it's too late. It will cost the US a lot more if Russia conquers Europa and China takes hold of Asia.
And before you buy into politician populist talks about Europe not paying enough, ask them if they're planning to cut military spending and thus lower taxes. Here's the spoiler: they won't.
@@davidgreen5994 yeh i get that but they spend it ineffectively in their own state rather than pool it and use it efficiently.
@@reneprovosty7032 I know, which is why there are a lot saying that we need an EU army, rather than NATO, as the inefficiency is the result of the how the treaty works. That inefficiency won't be solved in any way, by each member solving more. A country like Bulgaria would need to spend more than its entire GDP to get it's military on NATO standards.
NATO needs to understand that playing Russian roulette with a nuclear superpower is never a good idea
*Russia* needs to understand it's not a good idea to play Russian roulette with NATO. NATO is a nuclear alliance also, and given that Russia's economy and power structure is very centralized, all NATO has to take out is Moscow and Saint Petersburg. There are no such centers in the West. If Russia decides to use nukes, it'll be over.
Russia started this war in 2014, and before that they invaded Georgia. Russia can end the war but they won't because they wanted this war to happen. Otherwise they wouldn't have invaded in the first place.
If it is as poor as russian army in Ukraine, I could not care less. Putin is not the only one to have nuclear weapon.
The guests on DW and DW staff are sooooo delusional
For women to have a word in war issues we need women conscription cause now its just bananas....
I don’t understand that sentence.
💙💛🇺🇦🇺🇸🇪🇺🇨🇦👍👍👍
Why the Mighty Nafo panicking over Russia though? 😂 I thought Russia is weak? lol🤪
It is, weak AND gutless
@@BarkingSpyda then why Nafo panicking though? Against a weak opponent? 🤪
@@Mr.ClownenskyBecause its easy to destroy stuff than build it or protect it.
Russia might be weak but they can still do a lot of damage.
@@reubenmcmurray4377 so theyre not weak then if they can inflict devastating damage lol😂, you call someone or something "weAk" if their power is insignificant, that wont make a dent to you if you go fight. 😂 how can Russia be "weak" if Russia alone has the power to turn whole 3 continents into radioactive glass ? 😂
@@Mr.Clownensky GDP smaller than $2t. Imploding demographics.
Being stalemated by a country that the US (or probably China) could defeat in a month or less.
I guess weak is a matter of perspective but i compare Russia to countries like China, the EU or the US and it is weak by comparison.
In terms of economics the US and China are 10x the size of Russia, each. The EU is 7x the size.
Heck, some US/EU states have larger economies than Russia alone.
NATO isn’t a human being, Biden is and he needs to be taking your advice
Zelenskiy elected term ended on the 20th of May! No one is volunteering now in Western Ukraine and forced conscription is unpopular! A ceasefire and peace talks is the only way out!
Putin has clearly stated that there will be no cease fire unless Ukraine essentially just gives up... So it's not really an option.
@@matsmcmats It wasn't even an option for Vietnam to be unified by the communist Viet Cong, but after a shameful escape from Saigon...
It wasn't even an option for Afghanistan to return under the control of the Taliban, but after 20 years of guerrilla warfare and billions of dollars thrown into the wind, who is in charge in Kabul now?
"Ceasefire" is exactly what Russia wants to regroup, rearm and re-invade. Another thing that's even more unpopular in Ukraine is giving up people and territory to terrorussia.
Regarding the presidential terms, Ukraine is at war, and the Constitution of Ukraine has a martial law clause which was invoked because of the war. There will be an election as soon as Russia is defeated.
@@trumpforever6706 you are as coherent as you dear orange leader, son. Go donate some more money to him and let the grown ups do the talking.
The acceptance of Ukraine into NATO is the beginning of the peace process 🕊
No, it will be the start of WWIII. A global nuclear conflict.
Sorry mate - NOT as far as Russia is concerned!
@@trumpforever6706 Putin can invade non nato country only
The protection of European empire, rename the organization
Rename yourself the protector of Putin.
Yeah, we'd like to not be invaded by Russia. Pretty basic logic.
WW3 officially starts today....
If you read your Bibles you would know what is going to happen. God NEVER lies!
🙄
Why does God create evil?
nafo bots are afraid to join the front they dont want to see ukraine "winning"
9:55 He is very fit and ready to continue that leadership role
> In background video showing Biden struggling to walk
😂😂😂Who cares ABOUT NATO
The long peace since the last great war is in big parts due to non aggression pacts like NATO
NATO please don't push Russia
It's detrimental that they do not. For the sake of everyone on the planet, at this point.
This is your “Korea” they gonna split Ukraine 🇺🇦 for the next 100 years
@@RonaldAaronLopezit's detrimental to the entire world that NATO.. the world's most belligerent offensive alliance goes on completely unchecked.
So ignore the sovereignty and democratic endeavors of other nations?
@@Bushodaithat's nonsense. Ukraine hasn't been a sovereign nation since 2014, but a US client state.