Purchase shares in great masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more: www.masterworks.art/kingsandgenerals 🎨See important Reg A disclosures: Masterworks.com/cd *“net returns” refers to the annualized internal rate of return net of all fees and costs, calculated from the offering closing date to the sale date. IRR may not be indicative of Masterworks paintings not yet sold and past performance is not indicative of future results.
Mongols will get utterly destroyed in Western Europe. People forget the real masters of warfare are still Europeans. And horse archer armies aren't a novelty as Europeans have fought cavalry armies numerous times in the past. And let's not even talk about WESTERN STYLE CASTLES. Germany alone has 5 THOUSAND castles and fortified towns. Ask Hungary how a mere 50 WESTERN STYLE CASTLES destroyed the Golden Horde.
Imagine becoming so strong that there was no longer any need to justify your wars since you were destined to rule the world and the only acceptable diplomacy was to become subject or a rebel. That is an insane self-fulfilling prophecy.
the "Why" for many kingdoms seems to be "gathered together under a charismatic, healthy(or old) leader. pressured by outside forces that threaten their safety. Realize they just beat the "big bad" of the region. Original ruler dies. Heirs fuck shit up in chaotic and different ways." alexander, menes, khan, julius. many figures seem to not only obtain this status up until basically cameras, but the way their empires seemingly crumbled due to what was probly incest and lead poisoning/privilege causing their immediate successors to act sociopathically and tear it all down within a few 100 years or less.
"Increasingly, the mongols divided the world into two groups; those who had submitted, and those who had not." You know, I'm starting to think the fictional empire of Noxus has more in common with the Mongols than with Rome.
Nah, Rome definitely fits Noxus much better than the Mongols lol. Acutely defined hierarchical organization, culture prizing personal ambition even at the cost of close relatives, the designation of local magistrates to oversee territories, a capital city with seemingly modern day level population density, etc. And of course, the general similarities with Roman Aesthetics & utter lack of any nomadic influence in Noxus. But since Noxus is kind of an archetypical empire, it will share many similarities with empires of all kinds throughout history. Parallels can be drawn to Alexander's Empire or Napoleon's as well.
@@waltode6 It also means 'peace' but that's not exactly convenient if you're a fundamentalist, there are Christians who view the world in much the same way while they hope for the rapture.
Did you all just miss the extremely obvious parallels to Rome in this video? From divinely ordained conquest to leaders having/using specific religious titles to justify their power to treating all other peoples as subjects to be to every succeeding state using them for legitimacy? There are near 1 to 1 comparison in their imperial ideology with Rome up to around Trajan, the early Caliphate, Alexander's Macedon, Victorian England, and half of China's dynasties
The place where Genghis was declared khan is the place where the 2nd Gokturk state khan, the wise khan, had the Orkhon monuments built. If we look at Atilla, like Genghis Khan, he had his tomb built in secret. It is very impressive that nomadic traditions have remained unchanged for thousands of years, although it is not written, they have information about the past.
WE ARE THE MONGOLS. LOWER YOUR SHIELDS AND SURRENDER YOUR CITY. WE WILL ADD YOUR BIOLOGICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR CULTURE WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE
"If the Jin Empire and _everybody else_ didn't want to get conquered, then maybe they shouldn't have dressed like they were asking for it." -Chinggis, probably
Let it be remembered, that Temujin (Chinggis), only wanted to live a peaceful life with his family. However, the world didn't let him, constantly having to fight off bandits, and enemie clans wanting to oust him, and not to mention, kidnapp his wife, which they succefully did. The man had to hide away in the forest for many years of his life and live on the run, while dealing with wife and children of his own. And having been born into family rivalry, rumored to been forced to kill his very own brother over scraps of food, while they suffered hardship after being exiled from their clan when their father died. After succesfully rescuing his wife. I guess the Temujin had enough, realizing that nomatter how much you try to avoid conflict. Conflict will find you. So the only way one can be sure to be able to keep a peacefull life in the steppes was to bring the Conflict to them! A simple man, who wanted to live a simple life, ending up creating the largest empire the world has ever seen. If anything, his world conquest didn't start before he was a Middle aged man of the era. (He was within his 30's or so if I'm not mistaken). If anything is to give you inspiration but you feel to old to do certain stuff, or begin to learn something new. Remember, Chinggis Khan conquered majority of the world in his 30's. @Kings and Generals ever considering making a dedicated video covering all of Temujins life? From the legends and rumors to the ones documented in records? It's definitely one of those life stories that worthy of an epic movie.
What many historian failed to teach and many people failed to realize is that the true reason of kings waging war is to unite the world and to bring peace.
Even after consolidating his rule over his people and the steppes, this thing that was quickly becoming an empire, needed to conquer and claim more loot to survive. After like a decade of conquering the clans and their neighbors his people got used to all the new goods and resources of the eastern and western world. It's like building a strong foundation for your nation only to realize that your best intentions means the death and subjugation of entire civilizations because to go back to a simple life means your nation will self destruct
@@herbthompson8937 it goes into detail in Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World by Jack Weatherford. It goes from his childhood to the black plague and the end of the Mongol Empire as we know it. Doesn't talk about the more heinous acts of his life. Which I'm like 50/50 on if it was Chingis or his descendents who did the truly horrible stuff. Either way, it's a good read.
"The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy and drive them before you. To see his cities reduced to ashes. To see those who love him shrouded, and in tears. And to gather to your bosom his wives and daughters." - Genghis. Stop kidding yourself, trad-cu cks. He did it all for personal ambition and lust for conquest.
In many ways this is very similar to most other Imperial Ideologies which just goes to show how material circumstances influence cultural identity. The Romans deified the emperors and believed they had an inherent right to rule the world and later Christianity led them to believe that their Empire was sacred and chosen by God to conquer the entire world, this belief would live on in the Byzantine Empire. The Arab Caliphate would also slowly develop the same ideas that they were chosen by God to conquer the world and spread Islam to all of the world and therefore war against anyone not already Muslim was justified. The Chinese Empire of course also believed that they had the divine Mandate of Heaven which made them the only legitimate rulers of the world and would demand tribute from far flung lands. The Aztecs believed that they had to continue conquering in order to satisfy their gods and anyone who resisted should be sacrificed to their gods. All of the European colonial empires justified their imperialism on the basis of religion saying that they had a divine mission to spread Christianity and would later start to believe in the idea of a semi-holy "Mission to Civilize" which of course meant to conquer and assimilate as much of the world as possible since specifically their culture was the only civilized one and chosen by God based on national myths. These days outright aggressive imperialist ideology which simply asserts that the country has an inherent right to invade is much less popular, but you do see countries often claiming a more secular right to aggressive actions such as the American idea of spreading democracy, which can justify aggression against seemingly any country regardless of how democratic it is or how often the US actually does create democracies, China seeming to re-assert old claims but now based on a more secular idea of China as a destined world power and most recently Russia in Ukraine which comes from an idea of sovereignty over all Slavic people. Imperial ideologies are fairly predictable because they all result from similar needs and similar circumstances. If a country suddenly gains an enormous amount of power that will always lead people to conclude that said country was always destined to do this and the conquests that result from this must be justified so it is claimed as some sort of inherent right of the only legitimate power on Earth. On the surface they might appear very different but they all tend to converge among similar lines even if it might nave a non-imperialist or even anti-imperialist basis, as you could argue was the case for the US and China who both did at first legitimately support the dissolution of other empires.
Ubraines a use puppet though, they hunted pro rusian protestors and burned them in odesa burnings. Victorbruhia nuubland leaked phone calls and the usaes self admitted bio labs. As slav i have more fear coming from a democracy that has a stupid puppet dementia man that controls nukes and military bases around the world, rather than rusia. See ted gunderson to see who actually controls use.
I think Russia in Ukraine comes more from the idea that Russia is the only great nation in the world and can do no wrong, so all it's conquests and crimes are justified. In particular the soviet collapse is seen as an infiltration by foreigners and jews that was illegal and so Russia should be allowed to use military force on all their former colonies.
these imperialism ideologies are the very core that justify their conquest of the world. if history repeats then we are gonna have another country having that sort of imperialism ideologies
I don't think the Arabs were slow about getting it in thier head, from what I understand it was pretty much part of thier religion from day one. That and sleeping children.
thank you so mucho for making this videos! the motivations of the mongols are things that have always interested me but have never been able to fully understand
Can I just say, Mongols have the coolest names of anyone throughout history: Chinggis, Kublai, Ogedei, Kaidu, and so many more. Idk why I love Mongol names, they just sound badass.
I'm still sad "Marco Polo" was cancelled by Netflix. I know these type of historical shows will change things around to tell a good story, so they're not historically accurate, but it sure was entertaining. Benedict Wong was an intimidating Kublai Khan. It was interesting to see how the Mongols rule and how all these other groups were all under the Khan. How they control the silk road and everything.
Well like the change up in fight sequences ruined that... but to be fair at the end they started Kung fuing the fuck out of it over letting it be a story about the empire and marco polo's exploitd.
The title "Chingis" is quite similar to the title "Dalai" of Dalai Lama. The word Chingis was likely a borrowed word from a Turkic language, which eventually evolved into a modern Mongolian word "Tengis", which means "Sea". Similarly, Dalai Lama's title "Dalai" means "Ocean" in Mongolian, basically conveying the meaning of great/vast.
The Crimean Khans (Giray Dynasty) were descendants of Chinggis Khan. After they swore loyalty to the Ottoman Sultan, they enjoyed autonomy and respect that no other Ottoman vassal could enjoy, probably because of their ancestry. In Ottoman protocol, when they met the Sultan, viziers, foreign diplomats and clergymen had to bow down and kiss his hands or skirts as a sign of loyalty and respect. Even Sultan's own Grandvizier. The exception was the Crimean Khan. When the Crimean Khan arrived at Sultan's court, Sultan would welcome him by standing up from his throne, hugging him and calling him his "brother". This respect continued until the 2nd Siege of Vienna, where Ottomans were kind of betrayed by their Crimean vassals. After Vienna, the Khan was reduced to the level of Grandvizier in protocol. A little fun fact: When Murad IV was in death bed, he had a plan to destroy the entire remaining Ottoman dynasty and leave the throne to Girays, since he viewed his heirs extremely incompetent. He failed and Ibrahim I the Mad, one of the worst sultans in Ottoman history, survived and took power after his brother's death. So, there is an alternate universe somewhere that the Ottoman Empire was reorganized as the Giray Empire after 1640.
being descendant of Chinggis Khan（ ᠠᠯᠲᠠᠨ ᠣᠷᠣᠭ golden lineage） is utmost privilege a turco-mongol person can held in midevil world，temur cherish his “son in law of （genghis） ᠬᠦᠷᠭᠡᠨ/hurgen ” title more than emir or king，so when babur and his army enters indian sub continent，they perfer to call themselves “ghurkanis”
As a Turkish speaker we use "kut" as root for many words such as, "kut-lu (blessed, happy)", "kut-sal (holy)", "kut-lama (celebration)", "kut-sama (blessing)"
Also. Never kill or harm the messengers. Mongols also respected the envoys and messenger of othe nations. But anytime the western or Eastern kingdoms decided to be petty and kill or maime Mongols envoys. Pretty was them signing their people death certificate.
That's just not the case. The Russian prince of Ryazan, the first to encounter Batu Khan's invaders, received Mongol embassy exceptionally well and even send his own son as ambassador to Batu's camp with rich gifts. At first Batu praised the princeling and said there's no plan to attack Ryazan but then casually suggested that the princeling should bring his own wife to Batu as a gift too. When the princeling naturally refused, Batu slaughtered him and the entire embassy, laying the Ryazan princedom to ruin next.
Another awesome video on an unexpected day! Thanks for shedding some light on Mongol ideology. Looking forward to seeing more on the Mongols. And for Wizards and Warriors: What if the Mongols (in spite of their sailing skills) discovered the Americas?
1. Because Genghis Khan's ambitions were on the highest level. 2. Because Mongols before Temujin's appearance were weak, small people and wanted to become a united, strong nation. 3. Because other conquerors (Tatars, Merkits, Chinese, Kyrgyz) always attacked Mongol lands and killed many of them. So, Mongols had to take revenge.
MODUN SHANIYU WAS A LEADER OF HUNNU AND HE WAS LIVING IN CHINA WHEN HE IS MONGOLIAN BECAUSE HE ALREADY WAS CONQUERING CHINA BACK THEN. SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT HE WAS CHINESE, IN FACT NO HE WASNT CHINESE. NOWADAYS CHINESE PEOPLE TRYING TO BUY MONGOLIAN HISTORY WITH ANY COST. 7 MILLION PEOPLE WITH MONGOLIAN BLOOD LIVING IN NORTHSIDE OF CHINA RIGHT NOW AND CHINESE GOVERNMENT FORBIDDEN THEIR LANGUAGE AND THEY RESTRICTED THEIR CHILDREN TO LEARN MONGOLIAN TRADITIONAL LETTER. CHINESE PEOPLE ARE DESTROYING OUR HISTORY. WE NEED DAMN HELP
Ogedei had the attitude of me in late game eu4 when ive achieved all my initial goals but now im bored so i just start invading everyone around me for the sake of it.
Fun fact: I learned it from *ahem* secret someone, he said: mostly it was the other country's desire to enslave Mongolians (We were strong, hardened and useful potential slave force from steppes, that does not kill themselves like Japanese for example, when enslaved and taken. Our belief was that none should suicide no matter what, but fight to live off your best possible life because your/everyone's life is the most valuable thing). So our ideology/belief and our circumstances forced us to start "stop slavery in Asia at least" - kind of conquest. Apparently back in the day slavery was a big thing, and nowadays people does not really consider it that much, when talking about life back in the day. Remember: Khaan is not just some kind of mindless conqueror, they are slaves to their people's will and wellness. Not only Khaan but Mongolians fought for their lost sons and daughters to slavery, to find them or at least find out what happened to them. Mongolia was sort of good breeding ground for slaves, "they" took what was extra and left just enough men and women to reproduce for the next year's/generation's abduction by constant raids, like a human agriculture... There are even stories about Mongolian slaves in FAR ITALY, just think about how far was the slavery web connections. For Mongolians conquering the world was nothing compared to their willingness to find their lost relatives and so on. And that is how Mongolian armies was created, essentially. Because maintaining armies just by enough gold and fortune is not good enough for the longevity of the army, YOU NEED REASONS. And because of Mongol Empire, taking slaves from Asia became to be not an option or at least not an easy option for "westerners and others", soo they just resorted to taking slaves from Africa instead... WHAAAT. Do you ever considered WHY some people (even young generation of Europeans themselves) say that England or some other countries was built by the blood of slaves? So sorry Africans and African-Americans or black Americans, you just kind of became the alternate sacrificial chess piece instead of Asians, if you look at bigger picture of world history... PS: And yes I am a Mongolian. Believe it or not, that is your choice, it is just what I learned.
Hi Kings & Generals, I really loved your content. Appreciate all your hardwork. Just 1 thing that I would like to point out: the Chinese character Jin (晋) that used in the content is not for Mongol's Jin Dynasty. it should be 金 instead.
It's very interesting that in Turkey we say "Doğum günün kutlu olsun" if it is someone's birthday which you mentioned Qut in the video so it still lives even in Anatolia. And the founder of the Turkey Seljuks name is Kutalmışoğlu Süleyman Şah. And we say "kutsal" to say sacred/holy in Turkish
The moment i saw the video i literally thought that they most likely tried to define it in a western pow and prolly not even understand the concept of Kut. Than boom! Literally the very first sentence was about Kut… I salute the author-researcher and all KnG team. Watching ur docs is mesnerizng and feels like a crime to be able to watch it for free. Now i have to learn about patreon and open an acc just for you.. Look what u have done. Happy? 😂 Love and respect from Türkiye, please keep up the great work!
Neo-Tengrist Oguz Turk here, it's a great video. It's good to see this kind of videos not based on wikipedia as a source. Though, it could be better If you had mentioned Türk Qaghanate (Kök-Törük) as they were the most influencial empire when it comes to nomadic states of Eurasia.
You are not an oghuz turk. Turks of Turkey are %30 Central Asian %70 Local Anatolian(i found this on a website called turkishdnaproject, made by Turks). Your ancestors are both Turkmens and the Roman citizens of Eastern Roman Empire. And you are rejecting %70 of your ancestors because of your upbringing.
@@thefaramith8876 What is this furry? I do not reject shit. I even know one of the guys who run that website. I am probably 30-45 percent Oguz and Oguz were hybrit race of Aryan Scythians and Sibirids of taiga. It did not made them less Scythian or less native Siberians, they were both and a new. I am genetically both Oguz Turk and concerning my familiy (which both side are ethnic Turks) probably native Caucasian and some Anatolian. My father's side are Yörüks (nomads) and they have highly Asian features and my mother's side is Turks from Caucasia who migrated to Central Anatolia during a Russo-Turkish war in 19thC. Concepts of ethnicity, nationality and race are different. I am ethnicially an Oguz Turk, my nationality is none since I reject to belong in any nations which are made up abstract identities designed to enslave people, and my race is a hybrit of Siberian, Aryan, Anatolian and native Caucasian races. And I embrace all my roots without a shame or denial.
@@tengri_tunga There is no fury or angry but if you call yourself neo-tengrist oghuz turk, that, from the first glance, looks like you are rejecting that part. Most of the Turkish nationals on the internet are completely ignoring their ancestry in this matter. I commend you that you are the minority. It just seems illogical to me that whats the point of being a tengrist, a highly traditional and local religion or belief, when most of your ancestors were not tengriist. But I cant judge anyone. So yeah, sorry if that came off as aggressive.
@@thefaramith8876 Philosophy behind Tengrism (I mean early Tengrism) is beautiful, and I think it offers solution to all our modern issues with nature and society. I recommend you to read studies of Turkologists about early Tengrism/Shamanism. Then to think how it can be reformed to modern times. Have a nice day. Take care.
It is wrong to say that shamans are weaker then the khaans but rather it was a idea of separation of the state and religion just like modern day USA. Yes religion is important but are not to get involve in state politics.
There was a parallel to what the Mongols did and what the European Empires did in the 17th 18th and 19th Century. Other than themselves, they didn't see other civilisations as fellow human beings They were their to be conquered and exploited.
Nah, the parallel is to what the Europeans did in the crusades, even before the Mongols. They literally slaughtered entire cities because they deemed them as infidels.
Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home. May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222
There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were unstoppable
Temujin did what he had to do, in order to survive, The modern concept of peace and brotherhood didn't exist back then in the dog-eat-dog world of the steppes. if you wanted to survive amongst monsters, you had to become the biggest monster of them all. GK went though unimaginable hell right from childhood, and accidentally found himself as the Alpha Monster (he suffered many humiliating defeats in his rise to power) by the time he reached middle age (40s). It was only after he managed to unite all Mongolia under his banner and became Genghis Khan, that he attainted the invincible tag in his wars with the outside world, simply because his other opponents hailed from far more "civilized kingdoms", and these "refined rulers" were no match for the rabid dogs with blood-lust that emerged out of the misty steppes, and who didn't suffer from any moral / ethical / chivalric compunctions, not to mention GK's charisma, generalship and his briliance as a tactician and war strategist.
I sometimes wonder if his most important skill was to be able to survive defeats, as usually defeats in this kind of environments are not simply humiliating but almost always lethal, yet it seems he always managed to slip through the cracks even when he was relatively weak
Empire was turkic, army was turkic, script was based on uyghur script, medieval mongol was more like turkic language and for example Chinese medieval annal Mengdabeilu says mongols came from Shatuo Turks and were of turkic origin
@@numeron509 Yeah but nobody call it the turkic empire, so shut up, the turk was just the commoners and servants to be ordered around, while the ruling class are Mongol.
Futile question. Such question can be applied to any warring people, conqueror, anglo-French-Roman-German wars; or recently Falkland, Slavian, Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, Libya. List is long.
A "Khan" is simply a leader of extended household or a leader of a several merged households. Similar to a Sicilian (Italy) leader of extended household is called a "Don". Jang-He (Chinggis) Khan means leader of each and all households or War Leader or Commander in chief (USA). "Jang-He" in Persian-corrupted-form is "Jahan-Gir" meaning Universe-Conqueror.
i dont know if you’re proud of yourselves but i sure am proud of you for going out of your way to pronounce it Chingis Khan, as should be, even if nobody was going to correct you for saying Genghis Khan
I agree with you. These are the books of Rashiddin Hamadoni and Najmuddin Kubro. In 2019, the Iranian Ismaili Shia leader Aga Khan gave the Kazakh government in exchange for opening a Shia school in Kazakhstan. My acquaintances said that he was in Astana at the event of giving away the books of those historical figures. If I am not mistaken, their copies were given to Tashkent. It is stored in the library named after Alisher Navoi, but cannot be taken out anywhere. Maybe they will be published in the near future. As for the word Mongol, it is only a pronunciation of the Turkic khanate 'Mangu El' ideology among the Turkic peoples. Genghis Khan's red-haired and blue-eyed, Turkic Qiyat tribe has no relation to the Manchurians, the fair-skinned people living in modern Mongolia. This is confirmed by Rashididdin Hamadoni in his works. In addition, Amir Temur's grandson Mirzo Ulugbek in his book "The History of Four Uluses" cites similar information and that Genghis Khan was Turkic. As for K&G, it looks like it needs to re-examine its sources. By the way, that work of Mirzo Ulugbek in Tashkent was copied from the original in Britain.
@@luckprosperity5098Rashid al din never met Genghis Khan and lived around 60 years after his death. And historians have all agreed that Rashid al din works have been misinterpreted. Evidently people got it wrong because Chinggis khan’s clan name “Borjigin” was translated from medieval Persian to Slavic language in wrong interpretation. (source Боржигин нэрийн тухайд) In Mongolian, core of the word “Borjigin” is “Buri” which means Wolf. Persians didn’t translate word Borjigin to Persian and wrote in their historical texts as it is. In Medieval Persian “Borjigin” means blue tinted brown. Slavic and Germanic chroniclers in the other hand translated from Persian word to their own as “Blue eyed
So fairly analogous to the Western belief in 'Divine Right' and eventually absolutism? Our family has ruled for so long now, that surely it must be the provenance of God that we will always rule, and that all beneath us are either our subjects, or our future subjects, and because of this provenance we may do with our subjects as we wish, as we are above reproach. Which, also like the ruling mongol dynasties, did not end well for these families - if not for somewhat differing reasons.
No, we are the only one. Check out Epic History TV, HistoryMarch, Bazbattles, Cogito, Armchair Historian, Flash Point History, Athun Shei, Knowing Better, Ancient Sites Girl.
How the Mongol invasion got defeated : Java : Tricked by the rightfull heir from the dinasty that they want to kick out. Japan : Got blown away by the divine wind. Egypt : The Mamluk use the same tactics like the Mongol. Vietnam : war of attrition and guerilla warfare. Europe : the Khan died of illness.
"Battle of Buir Lake - Wikipedia" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Buir_Lake meanwhile the Ming Chinese successfully invaded and raided the Mongol's capital and homeland without bluffing, and not just won some small defensive battles,
Europe: The mongols failed to capture a single castle in both hungary and poland and later got rekt in the second and third invasions of central europe Go learn some history kid
Purchase shares in great masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more: www.masterworks.art/kingsandgenerals 🎨See important Reg A disclosures: Masterworks.com/cd
*“net returns” refers to the annualized internal rate of return net of all fees and costs, calculated from the offering closing date to the sale date. IRR may not be indicative of Masterworks paintings not yet sold and past performance is not indicative of future results.
Fine Art is just your grandparent's NFTs.
Evoulation of indo europe language 2nd part upload indo iranian slavic albanian
The gas price going up in Europe has nothing to do with climate. It's going up mostly on the reliance of oil from Russia.
Mongols will get utterly destroyed in Western Europe. People forget the real masters of warfare are still Europeans. And horse archer armies aren't a novelty as Europeans have fought cavalry armies numerous times in the past. And let's not even talk about WESTERN STYLE CASTLES. Germany alone has 5 THOUSAND castles and fortified towns. Ask Hungary how a mere 50 WESTERN STYLE CASTLES destroyed the Golden Horde.
add english subtitles
Imagine becoming so strong that there was no longer any need to justify your wars since you were destined to rule the world and the only acceptable diplomacy was to become subject or a rebel. That is an insane self-fulfilling prophecy.
“Manifest Destiny?”
Paradox strategy game moment
Legit feels like a strategy game player
They failed though.
@@averykleon they failed? Not in genhgis’ lifetime.
The "how" is always interesting, but the "why" is often neglected - and to me at least, so much more fascinating. BRAIN FOOD. Great work.
Indeed!
the "Why" for many kingdoms seems to be "gathered together under a charismatic, healthy(or old) leader. pressured by outside forces that threaten their safety. Realize they just beat the "big bad" of the region. Original ruler dies. Heirs fuck shit up in chaotic and different ways."
alexander, menes, khan, julius. many figures seem to not only obtain this status up until basically cameras, but the way their empires seemingly crumbled due to what was probly incest and lead poisoning/privilege causing their immediate successors to act sociopathically and tear it all down within a few 100 years or less.
"Increasingly, the mongols divided the world into two groups; those who had submitted, and those who had not."
You know, I'm starting to think the fictional empire of Noxus has more in common with the Mongols than with Rome.
Caesar's legion from fallout is the same.
It has a lot of parallels with the empire of Chinggis.
Ultra conservative Muslims think along the same lines, for Islam means submission to Allah.
Nah, Rome definitely fits Noxus much better than the Mongols lol. Acutely defined hierarchical organization, culture prizing personal ambition even at the cost of close relatives, the designation of local magistrates to oversee territories, a capital city with seemingly modern day level population density, etc.
And of course, the general similarities with Roman Aesthetics & utter lack of any nomadic influence in Noxus. But since Noxus is kind of an archetypical empire, it will share many similarities with empires of all kinds throughout history. Parallels can be drawn to Alexander's Empire or Napoleon's as well.
@@waltode6 It also means 'peace' but that's not exactly convenient if you're a fundamentalist, there are Christians who view the world in much the same way while they hope for the rapture.
Did you all just miss the extremely obvious parallels to Rome in this video?
From divinely ordained conquest to leaders having/using specific religious titles to justify their power to treating all other peoples as subjects to be to every succeeding state using them for legitimacy?
There are near 1 to 1 comparison in their imperial ideology with Rome up to around Trajan, the early Caliphate, Alexander's Macedon, Victorian England, and half of China's dynasties
The place where Genghis was declared khan is the place where the 2nd Gokturk state khan, the wise khan, had the Orkhon monuments built. If we look at Atilla, like Genghis Khan, he had his tomb built in secret. It is very impressive that nomadic traditions have remained unchanged for thousands of years, although it is not written, they have information about the past.
Mongol ideology simplified: “All your realms belong to us.”
WE ARE THE MONGOLS. LOWER YOUR SHIELDS AND SURRENDER YOUR CITY. WE WILL ADD YOUR BIOLOGICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR CULTURE WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE
It is pretty much similar ideology to most empires.
Inner Mongolia: euh...
Mongols: you exist because we allow it, you will perish because we demand it!
@@marloyorkrodriguez9975 Inner Mongolia: euh?... ok,
"If the Jin Empire and _everybody else_ didn't want to get conquered, then maybe they shouldn't have dressed like they were asking for it." -Chinggis, probably
Let it be remembered, that Temujin (Chinggis), only wanted to live a peaceful life with his family.
However, the world didn't let him, constantly having to fight off bandits, and enemie clans wanting to oust him, and not to mention, kidnapp his wife, which they succefully did.
The man had to hide away in the forest for many years of his life and live on the run, while dealing with wife and children of his own. And having been born into family rivalry, rumored to been forced to kill his very own brother over scraps of food, while they suffered hardship after being exiled from their clan when their father died.
After succesfully rescuing his wife. I guess the Temujin had enough, realizing that nomatter how much you try to avoid conflict. Conflict will find you.
So the only way one can be sure to be able to keep a peacefull life in the steppes was to bring the Conflict to them!
A simple man, who wanted to live a simple life, ending up creating the largest empire the world has ever seen.
If anything, his world conquest didn't start before he was a Middle aged man of the era. (He was within his 30's or so if I'm not mistaken).
If anything is to give you inspiration but you feel to old to do certain stuff, or begin to learn something new. Remember, Chinggis Khan conquered majority of the world in his 30's.
@Kings and Generals ever considering making a dedicated video covering all of Temujins life? From the legends and rumors to the ones documented in records? It's definitely one of those life stories that worthy of an epic movie.
What many historian failed to teach and many people failed to realize is that the true reason of kings waging war is to unite the world and to bring peace.
Even after consolidating his rule over his people and the steppes, this thing that was quickly becoming an empire, needed to conquer and claim more loot to survive. After like a decade of conquering the clans and their neighbors his people got used to all the new goods and resources of the eastern and western world. It's like building a strong foundation for your nation only to realize that your best intentions means the death and subjugation of entire civilizations because to go back to a simple life means your nation will self destruct
@@herbthompson8937 it goes into detail in Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World by Jack Weatherford. It goes from his childhood to the black plague and the end of the Mongol Empire as we know it. Doesn't talk about the more heinous acts of his life. Which I'm like 50/50 on if it was Chingis or his descendents who did the truly horrible stuff. Either way, it's a good read.
"The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy and drive them before you. To see his cities reduced to ashes. To see those who love him shrouded, and in tears. And to gather to your bosom his wives and daughters." - Genghis.
Stop kidding yourself, trad-cu cks. He did it all for personal ambition and lust for conquest.
Chingiz truly lived in a society😔😔😩😩
In many ways this is very similar to most other Imperial Ideologies which just goes to show how material circumstances influence cultural identity. The Romans deified the emperors and believed they had an inherent right to rule the world and later Christianity led them to believe that their Empire was sacred and chosen by God to conquer the entire world, this belief would live on in the Byzantine Empire. The Arab Caliphate would also slowly develop the same ideas that they were chosen by God to conquer the world and spread Islam to all of the world and therefore war against anyone not already Muslim was justified. The Chinese Empire of course also believed that they had the divine Mandate of Heaven which made them the only legitimate rulers of the world and would demand tribute from far flung lands. The Aztecs believed that they had to continue conquering in order to satisfy their gods and anyone who resisted should be sacrificed to their gods. All of the European colonial empires justified their imperialism on the basis of religion saying that they had a divine mission to spread Christianity and would later start to believe in the idea of a semi-holy "Mission to Civilize" which of course meant to conquer and assimilate as much of the world as possible since specifically their culture was the only civilized one and chosen by God based on national myths. These days outright aggressive imperialist ideology which simply asserts that the country has an inherent right to invade is much less popular, but you do see countries often claiming a more secular right to aggressive actions such as the American idea of spreading democracy, which can justify aggression against seemingly any country regardless of how democratic it is or how often the US actually does create democracies, China seeming to re-assert old claims but now based on a more secular idea of China as a destined world power and most recently Russia in Ukraine which comes from an idea of sovereignty over all Slavic people.
Imperial ideologies are fairly predictable because they all result from similar needs and similar circumstances. If a country suddenly gains an enormous amount of power that will always lead people to conclude that said country was always destined to do this and the conquests that result from this must be justified so it is claimed as some sort of inherent right of the only legitimate power on Earth. On the surface they might appear very different but they all tend to converge among similar lines even if it might nave a non-imperialist or even anti-imperialist basis, as you could argue was the case for the US and China who both did at first legitimately support the dissolution of other empires.
Ubraines a use puppet though, they hunted pro rusian protestors and burned them in odesa burnings. Victorbruhia nuubland leaked phone calls and the usaes self admitted bio labs. As slav i have more fear coming from a democracy that has a stupid puppet dementia man that controls nukes and military bases around the world, rather than rusia. See ted gunderson to see who actually controls use.
I think Russia in Ukraine comes more from the idea that Russia is the only great nation in the world and can do no wrong, so all it's conquests and crimes are justified. In particular the soviet collapse is seen as an infiltration by foreigners and jews that was illegal and so Russia should be allowed to use military force on all their former colonies.
I would say the USs is more imperial without the empire
these imperialism ideologies are the very core that justify their conquest of the world. if history repeats then we are gonna have another country having that sort of imperialism ideologies
I don't think the Arabs were slow about getting it in thier head, from what I understand it was pretty much part of thier religion from day one. That and sleeping children.
Been wanting for you to make this one for quite some time. It's here now!
thank you so mucho for making this videos! the motivations of the mongols are things that have always interested me but have never been able to fully understand
Can I just say, Mongols have the coolest names of anyone throughout history: Chinggis, Kublai, Ogedei, Kaidu, and so many more. Idk why I love Mongol names, they just sound badass.
Oh, right, can't forget Temujin.
Timur, Berke, Mongke, Hulagu, Subutai, Jebe etc.
Yeah, I guess they've made this names badass
Nope. It's just your imagination. It's purely based on bias.
It is pretty badass. Lots of Mongolian names are
Muslim names are the coolest to me, personally. Mongols are a real close second though.
I'm still sad "Marco Polo" was cancelled by Netflix. I know these type of historical shows will change things around to tell a good story, so they're not historically accurate, but it sure was entertaining.
Benedict Wong was an intimidating Kublai Khan. It was interesting to see how the Mongols rule and how all these other groups were all under the Khan. How they control the silk road and everything.
Well like the change up in fight sequences ruined that... but to be fair at the end they started Kung fuing the fuck out of it over letting it be a story about the empire and marco polo's exploitd.
The title "Chingis" is quite similar to the title "Dalai" of Dalai Lama. The word Chingis was likely a borrowed word from a Turkic language, which eventually evolved into a modern Mongolian word "Tengis", which means "Sea". Similarly, Dalai Lama's title "Dalai" means "Ocean" in Mongolian, basically conveying the meaning of great/vast.
@joyboy3177Greek muslims on their way to claim everything as their own. I'm sure some have claimed they were the first humans.
The Crimean Khans (Giray Dynasty) were descendants of Chinggis Khan. After they swore loyalty to the Ottoman Sultan, they enjoyed autonomy and respect that no other Ottoman vassal could enjoy, probably because of their ancestry.
In Ottoman protocol, when they met the Sultan, viziers, foreign diplomats and clergymen had to bow down and kiss his hands or skirts as a sign of loyalty and respect. Even Sultan's own Grandvizier. The exception was the Crimean Khan. When the Crimean Khan arrived at Sultan's court, Sultan would welcome him by standing up from his throne, hugging him and calling him his "brother". This respect continued until the 2nd Siege of Vienna, where Ottomans were kind of betrayed by their Crimean vassals. After Vienna, the Khan was reduced to the level of Grandvizier in protocol.
A little fun fact: When Murad IV was in death bed, he had a plan to destroy the entire remaining Ottoman dynasty and leave the throne to Girays, since he viewed his heirs extremely incompetent. He failed and Ibrahim I the Mad, one of the worst sultans in Ottoman history, survived and took power after his brother's death. So, there is an alternate universe somewhere that the Ottoman Empire was reorganized as the Giray Empire after 1640.
being descendant of Chinggis Khan（ ᠠᠯᠲᠠᠨ ᠣᠷᠣᠭ golden lineage） is utmost privilege a turco-mongol person can held in midevil world，temur cherish his “son in law of （genghis） ᠬᠦᠷᠭᠡᠨ/hurgen ” title more than emir or king，so when babur and his army enters indian sub continent，they perfer to call themselves “ghurkanis”
If only he had more portals, dimensions, transporters, and enchantments.
Enchantment?
Enchantment!
And some attack helicopters, mlrs, ballistic cruise missiles and heavy machine guns😔
And Transformers.
Wow I wasn't expecting you to upload on my birthday, what a pleasant surprise 🤗
The founder of the Anatolian Seljuks was called "Kutalmışoğlu Süleymanşah" which is translated in English "Süleymanshah son of Qutgiven"
@@alfieingrouille1528 Did you even watch the video you genius? They also talk about Qut so its just a fun fact.
As a Turkish speaker we use "kut" as root for many words such as, "kut-lu (blessed, happy)", "kut-sal (holy)", "kut-lama (celebration)", "kut-sama (blessing)"
Just wanted to have good neighbours. But it's hard. Having no neighbour is better than having bad one LOL
Also. Never kill or harm the messengers. Mongols also respected the envoys and messenger of othe nations. But anytime the western or Eastern kingdoms decided to be petty and kill or maime Mongols envoys. Pretty was them signing their people death certificate.
That's just not the case.
The Russian prince of Ryazan, the first to encounter Batu Khan's invaders, received Mongol embassy exceptionally well and even send his own son as ambassador to Batu's camp with rich gifts.
At first Batu praised the princeling and said there's no plan to attack Ryazan but then casually suggested that the princeling should bring his own wife to Batu as a gift too. When the princeling naturally refused, Batu slaughtered him and the entire embassy, laying the Ryazan princedom to ruin next.
@@Diofill37 Quite an annoying bunch
Their history is surely impressive, there should be more epic series/movies/games about this whole world domination insanity of theirs…
Another awesome video on an unexpected day! Thanks for shedding some light on Mongol ideology. Looking forward to seeing more on the Mongols. And for Wizards and Warriors: What if the Mongols (in spite of their sailing skills) discovered the Americas?
Mongol vs Comanche/Prairie horse archers would be a sight to see.
Fantastic video keep it up your doing amazing job
1. Because Genghis Khan's ambitions were on the highest level.
2. Because Mongols before Temujin's appearance were weak, small people and wanted to become a united, strong nation.
3. Because other conquerors (Tatars, Merkits, Chinese, Kyrgyz) always attacked Mongol lands and killed many of them. So, Mongols had to take revenge.
Facts💯👏👏👏
HISTORY NEVER LIES MONGOLS ALWAYS BEEN CONQUERING THE HALF OF THE WORLD
MODUN SHANIYU WAS A LEADER OF HUNNU AND HE WAS LIVING IN CHINA WHEN HE IS MONGOLIAN BECAUSE HE ALREADY WAS CONQUERING CHINA BACK THEN. SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT HE WAS CHINESE, IN FACT NO HE WASNT CHINESE. NOWADAYS CHINESE PEOPLE TRYING TO BUY MONGOLIAN HISTORY WITH ANY COST. 7 MILLION PEOPLE WITH MONGOLIAN BLOOD LIVING IN NORTHSIDE OF CHINA RIGHT NOW AND CHINESE GOVERNMENT FORBIDDEN THEIR LANGUAGE AND THEY RESTRICTED THEIR CHILDREN TO LEARN MONGOLIAN TRADITIONAL LETTER. CHINESE PEOPLE ARE DESTROYING OUR HISTORY. WE NEED DAMN HELP
@@ttwentyone2143then create a new unity and destroy them
"God told me"
Pretty much a universal idea.
Ogedei had the attitude of me in late game eu4 when ive achieved all my initial goals but now im bored so i just start invading everyone around me for the sake of it.
Fun fact: I learned it from *ahem* secret someone, he said: mostly it was the other country's desire to enslave Mongolians (We were strong, hardened and useful potential slave force from steppes, that does not kill themselves like Japanese for example, when enslaved and taken. Our belief was that none should suicide no matter what, but fight to live off your best possible life because your/everyone's life is the most valuable thing). So our ideology/belief and our circumstances forced us to start "stop slavery in Asia at least" - kind of conquest. Apparently back in the day slavery was a big thing, and nowadays people does not really consider it that much, when talking about life back in the day. Remember: Khaan is not just some kind of mindless conqueror, they are slaves to their people's will and wellness. Not only Khaan but Mongolians fought for their lost sons and daughters to slavery, to find them or at least find out what happened to them. Mongolia was sort of good breeding ground for slaves, "they" took what was extra and left just enough men and women to reproduce for the next year's/generation's abduction by constant raids, like a human agriculture... There are even stories about Mongolian slaves in FAR ITALY, just think about how far was the slavery web connections. For Mongolians conquering the world was nothing compared to their willingness to find their lost relatives and so on. And that is how Mongolian armies was created, essentially. Because maintaining armies just by enough gold and fortune is not good enough for the longevity of the army, YOU NEED REASONS. And because of Mongol Empire, taking slaves from Asia became to be not an option or at least not an easy option for "westerners and others", soo they just resorted to taking slaves from Africa instead... WHAAAT. Do you ever considered WHY some people (even young generation of Europeans themselves) say that England or some other countries was built by the blood of slaves? So sorry Africans and African-Americans or black Americans, you just kind of became the alternate sacrificial chess piece instead of Asians, if you look at bigger picture of world history... PS: And yes I am a Mongolian. Believe it or not, that is your choice, it is just what I learned.
What a twisted way to justify the barbarism of the Mongols
Best history Channel to understand Mongols
Turkic army
@@numeron509 go and cry
@@123trixxx4 Go and cry bc I said the real historical fact, mad that turks ruled whole Eurasia?
Hi Kings & Generals, I really loved your content. Appreciate all your hardwork.
Just 1 thing that I would like to point out: the Chinese character Jin (晋) that used in the content is not for Mongol's Jin Dynasty. it should be 金 instead.
It's very interesting that in Turkey we say "Doğum günün kutlu olsun" if it is someone's birthday which you mentioned Qut in the video so it still lives even in Anatolia. And the founder of the Turkey Seljuks name is Kutalmışoğlu Süleyman Şah. And we say "kutsal" to say sacred/holy in Turkish
Videos like that would be very interesting for other well known empires like the British or mughals
The moment i saw the video i literally thought that they most likely tried to define it in a western pow and prolly not even understand the concept of Kut.
Than boom! Literally the very first sentence was about Kut…
I salute the author-researcher and all KnG team. Watching ur docs is mesnerizng and feels like a crime to be able to watch it for free.
Now i have to learn about patreon and open an acc just for you.. Look what u have done. Happy? 😂
Love and respect from Türkiye, please keep up the great work!
"Because it's there!"
-Chinggis, probably
Neo-Tengrist Oguz Turk here, it's a great video. It's good to see this kind of videos not based on wikipedia as a source. Though, it could be better If you had mentioned Türk Qaghanate (Kök-Törük) as they were the most influencial empire when it comes to nomadic states of Eurasia.
You are not an oghuz turk. Turks of Turkey are %30 Central Asian %70 Local Anatolian(i found this on a website called turkishdnaproject, made by Turks). Your ancestors are both Turkmens and the Roman citizens of Eastern Roman Empire. And you are rejecting %70 of your ancestors because of your upbringing.
@@thefaramith8876 What is this furry? I do not reject shit. I even know one of the guys who run that website. I am probably 30-45 percent Oguz and Oguz were hybrit race of Aryan Scythians and Sibirids of taiga. It did not made them less Scythian or less native Siberians, they were both and a new. I am genetically both Oguz Turk and concerning my familiy (which both side are ethnic Turks) probably native Caucasian and some Anatolian. My father's side are Yörüks (nomads) and they have highly Asian features and my mother's side is Turks from Caucasia who migrated to Central Anatolia during a Russo-Turkish war in 19thC.
Concepts of ethnicity, nationality and race are different. I am ethnicially an Oguz Turk, my nationality is none since I reject to belong in any nations which are made up abstract identities designed to enslave people, and my race is a hybrit of Siberian, Aryan, Anatolian and native Caucasian races. And I embrace all my roots without a shame or denial.
@@tengri_tunga There is no fury or angry but if you call yourself neo-tengrist oghuz turk, that, from the first glance, looks like you are rejecting that part.
Most of the Turkish nationals on the internet are completely ignoring their ancestry in this matter. I commend you that you are the minority.
It just seems illogical to me that whats the point of being a tengrist, a highly traditional and local religion or belief, when most of your ancestors were not tengriist. But I cant judge anyone.
So yeah, sorry if that came off as aggressive.
@@thefaramith8876 Philosophy behind Tengrism (I mean early Tengrism) is beautiful, and I think it offers solution to all our modern issues with nature and society. I recommend you to read studies of Turkologists about early Tengrism/Shamanism. Then to think how it can be reformed to modern times.
Have a nice day. Take care.
@@BrandonJuice your mom is mongolian
It is wrong to say that shamans are weaker then the khaans but rather it was a idea of separation of the state and religion just like modern day USA. Yes religion is important but are not to get involve in state politics.
This video should have had Tears for Fears' song playing in the background😅
Which of all his songs specifically? 🧐
@@bendercito EXCUSE MEEE!? "Everybody wants to rule the World"!
@@holyfreak8 oh well that's an amazing song 🆒😎👍
"Because it's there."
Genghis Khan responding to a reporter asking why he wanted to conquer the world, before beheading him and his entire city. 1224.
Just wanted to spread peace!
Another fascinating video!
There's a reason the Sardukar saw themselves as the descendants of the Mongols, or at the very least, willingly took on their culture
They say luck but maybe his gods really did back him, I mean a 25 year long good weather period in a place that rarely has good weather??
There was a parallel to what the Mongols did and what the European Empires did in the 17th 18th and 19th Century.
Other than themselves, they didn't see other civilisations as fellow human beings
They were their to be conquered and exploited.
Nah, the parallel is to what the Europeans did in the crusades, even before the Mongols. They literally slaughtered entire cities because they deemed them as infidels.
Thanks To video.
wow, great video
prolly the smoothest transition to an ad ive ever seen psyops should hire you
how can i thank you for your videos❤❤
he has a patreon page
The Mongols needed a common enemy. And the best way to have a common enemy is fighting against everybody.
08:22 Gotta love the sheep trying to stay in frame
Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home.
May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222
There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were unstoppable
dai viet win the battles but lost the war.they become tributery of Yuan.
Khiljis are Afghans
The mongols got their ass whooped by the polish and hungarians in the second half of the 13th century
Go learn some history
Mongols helped Javanese in return they backstabbed them.
Mamluks were saved by other Mongols(Golden horde)
Japanese were super lucky
@@Orgil. cap
Thanks for the video and information
Love this!
Make a video on Alexander the greats reasons for wanting to conquer the world
Th, I think the reason was, to quote the 1st man to reach the top of the Everest: "Because it was there".
Temujin did what he had to do, in order to survive, The modern concept of peace and brotherhood didn't exist back then in the dog-eat-dog world of the steppes. if you wanted to survive amongst monsters, you had to become the biggest monster of them all. GK went though unimaginable hell right from childhood, and accidentally found himself as the Alpha Monster (he suffered many humiliating defeats in his rise to power) by the time he reached middle age (40s).
It was only after he managed to unite all Mongolia under his banner and became Genghis Khan, that he attainted the invincible tag in his wars with the outside world, simply because his other opponents hailed from far more "civilized kingdoms", and these "refined rulers" were no match for the rabid dogs with blood-lust that emerged out of the misty steppes, and who didn't suffer from any moral / ethical / chivalric compunctions, not to mention GK's charisma, generalship and his briliance as a tactician and war strategist.
I sometimes wonder if his most important skill was to be able to survive defeats, as usually defeats in this kind of environments are not simply humiliating but almost always lethal, yet it seems he always managed to slip through the cracks even when he was relatively weak
Interesting video
This is good. But what is best in life?
I needed to write a easy on the mongols
Gotta respect the Mongols for their impressive tactics 👍
Empire was turkic, army was turkic, script was based on uyghur script, medieval mongol was more like turkic language and for example Chinese medieval annal Mengdabeilu says mongols came from Shatuo Turks and were of turkic origin
Genghis used Seljuk tactics, like in Manzikert battle
@@numeron509 Yeah but nobody call it the turkic empire, so shut up, the turk was just the commoners and servants to be ordered around, while the ruling class are Mongol.
Yeah everyting is turk right ? Moron
@@numeron509 no bro seljuks were known for their chivalry and discipline
while Mongols were known for their speed
surprises and brutally
6:09 "Earliest deees"
Man that was a little funny-sounding lol
He showed the world when it was still possible to show no matter ur wealth u will submit or die.
Futile question. Such question can be applied to any warring people, conqueror, anglo-French-Roman-German wars; or recently Falkland, Slavian, Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, Libya. List is long.
4:10-4:35 This was also the tradition in the Ottoman Empire
All I can think of is 40k warhammer Sigmar's great reconquering.
Chinggis was like Goku, he wanted to push his limits.
Awesome video! ⚔
A "Khan" is simply a leader of extended household or a leader of a several merged households. Similar to a Sicilian (Italy) leader of extended household is called a "Don". Jang-He (Chinggis) Khan means leader of each and all households or War Leader or Commander in chief (USA). "Jang-He" in Persian-corrupted-form is "Jahan-Gir" meaning Universe-Conqueror.
i dont know if you’re proud of yourselves but i sure am proud of you for going out of your way to pronounce it Chingis Khan, as should be, even if nobody was going to correct you for saying Genghis Khan
Manifest Destiny?
*mongol destiny
finally it answer my question, thank youu
I've seen that new documents have emerged where Chingis Khan was white with blue eyes and red hair and not asian
Link to them.
😁
I agree with you. These are the books of Rashiddin Hamadoni and Najmuddin Kubro. In 2019, the Iranian Ismaili Shia leader Aga Khan gave the Kazakh government in exchange for opening a Shia school in Kazakhstan. My acquaintances said that he was in Astana at the event of giving away the books of those historical figures. If I am not mistaken, their copies were given to Tashkent. It is stored in the library named after Alisher Navoi, but cannot be taken out anywhere. Maybe they will be published in the near future. As for the word Mongol, it is only a pronunciation of the Turkic khanate 'Mangu El' ideology among the Turkic peoples. Genghis Khan's red-haired and blue-eyed, Turkic Qiyat tribe has no relation to the Manchurians, the fair-skinned people living in modern Mongolia. This is confirmed by Rashididdin Hamadoni in his works. In addition, Amir Temur's grandson Mirzo Ulugbek in his book "The History of Four Uluses" cites similar information and that Genghis Khan was Turkic. As for K&G, it looks like it needs to re-examine its sources.
By the way, that work of Mirzo Ulugbek in Tashkent was copied from the original in Britain.
Nope, his portrait was made under his grandson Kublai, Genghis looked like the average mongol.
@@luckprosperity5098Rashid al din never met Genghis Khan and lived around 60 years after his death. And historians have all agreed that Rashid al din works have been misinterpreted. Evidently people got it wrong because Chinggis khan’s clan name “Borjigin” was translated from medieval Persian to Slavic language in wrong interpretation. (source Боржигин нэрийн тухайд) In Mongolian, core of the word “Borjigin” is “Buri” which means Wolf. Persians didn’t translate word Borjigin to Persian and wrote in their historical texts as it is. In Medieval Persian “Borjigin” means blue tinted brown. Slavic and Germanic chroniclers in the other hand translated from Persian word to their own as “Blue eyed
It is remarkable how much influence the Mongols had over the Russians. And in particular on their nationalism and understanding of the imperial idea.
Maybe his reason of conquering the world is similar to The Brain.
I love tengri
I must say the sheep to our left of the screen definitely doesn't want the attention shifted away from him/her.😅🤣🤣😂😆😀😄😃
The mongol Empire is the definition of becoming what You try to destroy.
King Louie sent gifts? Send him my thanks...for agreeing to be my servants
These guys are straight up perfect examples of delusion. What madness XD
„why did genghis khan try to conquer the world“
because everyone who has an army of 150 thousand blood hungry raiders would💀
always interesting
I literally just searched this up now theres a vid nice,more explaination!
Steppe rivals, what are you doing?
anyone know the soundtract at 12:30 thanks in advance
All I want is the land next to mine.
Kokharchu also known as Pikachu in dimension 11.456
please make more clip in youtube ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
So fairly analogous to the Western belief in 'Divine Right' and eventually absolutism? Our family has ruled for so long now, that surely it must be the provenance of God that we will always rule, and that all beneath us are either our subjects, or our future subjects, and because of this provenance we may do with our subjects as we wish, as we are above reproach. Which, also like the ruling mongol dynasties, did not end well for these families - if not for somewhat differing reasons.
Like in sports, you run the same play over and over until the opponent stops it.
Because Mongols usually have raid buffs and generate resources whenever they destroy enemy cities
Literally 'to the moon' 🚀
Anyone got some more recommendations of other YT Channels in this type of format?!? 🙏🏻
No, we are the only one.
Check out Epic History TV, HistoryMarch, Bazbattles, Cogito, Armchair Historian, Flash Point History, Athun Shei, Knowing Better, Ancient Sites Girl.
Nice video, please do mongol videos
So me when I play total war and hearts of iron
Can you do a video about the South African border war plzzz?
Damn this is interesting!
"Either you are with us or against us"
Probably Temujin
How the Mongol invasion got defeated :
Java : Tricked by the rightfull heir from the dinasty that they want to kick out.
Japan : Got blown away by the divine wind.
Egypt : The Mamluk use the same tactics like the Mongol.
Vietnam : war of attrition and guerilla warfare.
Europe : the Khan died of illness.
"Battle of Buir Lake - Wikipedia" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Buir_Lake
meanwhile the Ming Chinese successfully invaded and raided the Mongol's capital and homeland without bluffing, and not just won some small defensive battles,
Egypt : Use the civilwar/saved by other Mongols
Vietnam lost the war.
Europe: The mongols failed to capture a single castle in both hungary and poland and later got rekt in the second and third invasions of central europe
Go learn some history kid
@@theentertainmentnation4694 bro go and read thr name batu
Can't even buy these guys off without them assuming you're giving them to your country
Im just glad people are actually using the correct pronunciation. I hate it when they say Genghis.
The same reason why you want pumpkin spice latte