Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Week on the Wrist: IWC Mark XVIII

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 фев 2020
  • Visit our website: barkandjack.com
    Check out our watch straps: barkandjack.shop
    Hi Guys,
    IWC was kind enough to trust me with one of their Pilot's watches, the IWC Mark XVIII.
    This is a week on the wrist with the IWC Mark 18. It's a large watch at 40mm, but I don't think it wears too large.
    Let me know what you think of this Pilot's watch by IWC, the Mark XVIII.
    INSTAGRAM
    @barkandjack
    GEAR
    Camera (video) - Panasonic G80 - amzn.to/2nyCNaT
    Camera (stills) - Fujifilm X100F - amzn.to/2EfyFGg
    Lens - Panasonic 25mm f1.7 - amzn.to/2nBxBCV
    Microphone - Rode SmartLav+ - amzn.to/2E2KpNa
    Tripod - Manfrotto Compact - amzn.to/2EbtOpF
    Tags:
    #IWC #Pilotswatch #BarkAndJack
    Hands on with IWC mark XVIII, IWC Mark 18 reivew, IWC reivew, history of IWC Mark 18, IWC Mark watch, Rolex Explorer alternative, best rolex alternative, best aqua terra alternative, are IWC woth the money?, do IWC make good watches?, what movement is in the IWC Mark 18, new IWC watch, baselworld, IWC Mark vs Rolex Explorer, best aviation watch, best pilots watch, best iwc pilots watch,

Комментарии • 694

  • @edmondgayoso8627
    @edmondgayoso8627 4 года назад +110

    Its not boring, its simply minimalist and stunning.

    • @jimmason8502
      @jimmason8502 7 месяцев назад

      And expensive as hell.

    • @jmemphisTX
      @jmemphisTX 3 месяца назад

      @@jimmason8502the explorer 1 is twice the price and is a third of a watch compared to this

  • @utgbanduk
    @utgbanduk 4 года назад +38

    I love the blue tint from the AR coating! Funny how people have different tastes

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад +6

      Haha. I’m sure it would grow on me. I think I was being overly picky with that.

    • @utgbanduk
      @utgbanduk 4 года назад +5

      Bark and Jack totally agree on the date window though... I knew exactly what you were going to say before you said it 😂

    • @steviedj6730
      @steviedj6730 4 года назад +1

      @@utgbanduk ha ha, hark back to the first comment on this thread, i have to have a date to even consider a watch. And squiffy date like the overseas Overseas chrono drives me potty... I'm office based... i think necessity drives likes and dislikes! 👍

  • @h.b.4443
    @h.b.4443 2 года назад +35

    This watch is the epitome of “less is more”. Stunning because of its minimalist and well balanced design.

    • @jimmason8502
      @jimmason8502 7 месяцев назад +2

      It'll really minimize your bank account.

    • @somerandomguy9156
      @somerandomguy9156 18 дней назад

      @@jimmason8502 facts 😂😂

  • @qadrik
    @qadrik 4 года назад +69

    After watching this video. I have 1 word for you Adrian: HAT! Get a winter hat man!

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад +7

      Haha. You’re right. I need to get one. 👍🏻

    • @Swayndo
      @Swayndo 4 года назад +3

      You still have a good head of hair. Maybe ear muffs?

  • @shahabasnishtar6240
    @shahabasnishtar6240 4 года назад +7

    I own the IWC Mark XV and I strongly recommend the watch to those here worried about the size and price of the Mark XVIII. It's perfectly sized at 38mm and can be purchased for less than half the XVIII. Plus the date window is in perfect symmetry to the rest of the dial and the hands are inspired by the Mark XI.
    Great content as always, Adrian!

  • @zarakkhan571
    @zarakkhan571 2 года назад +3

    By far one of the best and more simple, minimal design by IWC. I love it

  • @erich9882
    @erich9882 4 года назад +103

    The positioning of the date window is at the mercy of the small movement

    • @buddyb-uo7gu
      @buddyb-uo7gu 4 года назад +19

      Interestingly, Oris reengineered the sw200 or 2824, in order to shift the date window farther from the centre of the dial on their similar Pro-pilot watch. It's a really a nice touch on a much less expensive watch. I haven't seen this done by any other manufacturers that employ these off the shelf movements.
      Thanks,

    • @Stringbob
      @Stringbob 4 года назад +2

      It’s not a function of a small movement, but an oversize watch. The SW300 is a A2892 clone, which came from an era when a 36mm dia was considered large. Check out the IWC 36mm Pilot, or even the mk xv for a better placed date window?

    • @TruckeeDoggo
      @TruckeeDoggo 4 года назад +7

      I agree. The date window placement is terrible. Once you see, you cannot unsee

    • @patrickdaly5988
      @patrickdaly5988 4 года назад

      Hopefully the Mark XIX will follow the Spitfire and correct with the new "in house" movement and downsized case. Other than the lack of lume (and the price point) I really like these. But yeah that date window is horrible.

    • @FirstDonkie
      @FirstDonkie 4 года назад +3

      Buy a Stowa. You can choose a date window or skip it all together. Clever!

  • @chrisafontana
    @chrisafontana 4 года назад +7

    The last minute with you getting pelted with ice crystals literally made me LOL...awesome! Glad you kept that in the video...

  • @JamesSolanki
    @JamesSolanki 4 года назад +43

    The development of this channel is amazing to see. I love the content keep it up!

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад +2

      Thanks so much James. 👍🏻

  • @RobinH8869
    @RobinH8869 4 года назад +6

    I've had my Le Petit Prince version of this for years - I've got lots of / too many watches but my IWC is still one of my go to watches as it wears so well and can be dressed up and down easily. The blue dial of the Prince gives extra interest to the great design and helps with the AR coating too.

  • @Balonishell
    @Balonishell 4 года назад +1

    I love this watch. I wear it every day. My Sub sits in the safe and only comes out on special occasions. I love how this watch flies under the radar. I have it on a grey leather nato from Bulang & Sons.

  • @theonlyredspecial
    @theonlyredspecial 3 года назад +3

    I love iwc. One of my favourite brands. Big pilot is an iconic watch with a fantastic in-house movement, week long power reserve and one of the most legible, easy to use crowns on the market. It doubles up as a bed dresser clock too. Epic pieces.

  • @richardwehli2110
    @richardwehli2110 4 года назад +3

    I have been looking at one of these on a bracelet through a jewellers window for weeks now. Beautiful watch 😍

  • @maxlyca230
    @maxlyca230 4 года назад +26

    I love IWC and have quite a few of them. I’ve actually seen the new 2020 collection and they made me sign a NDA so 🤫. I hope you do more reviews of their watch as you now have a contact inside IWC. I look forward to seeing more.

  • @Youcantleavethisempty01
    @Youcantleavethisempty01 4 года назад +7

    Love it! I don’t agree with the accusation from others of it being a boring design. Is the oyster perpetual boring? Is an old dressy AP boring? Come on. It was designed for legibility. It’s gorgeous in its simplicity.
    I would have preferred to see the 36mm Pilot in your wrist. It’s my fav!

  • @steveottavaino3804
    @steveottavaino3804 4 года назад +9

    I love the hate IWC gets. Have this watch on a bracelet and it’s the favorite of my collection, close to the least expensive, and certainly the most comfortable and possibly the best finished and most accurate. Subtle elegance, ultimately satisfying, and delivering a pride of ownership punching well above its weight. I must assume the hate comes from those who have not owned an IWC or are perhaps movement snobs and have not done in person side to side comparisons to other Swiss or Japanese (GS) brands. I have, I own them, and believe IWC delivers a superlative watch and owners experience. Excellent review and pleased you get the IWC thing, suspect they’ll be one on your wrist in the future. Hope you have some feeling back in your face, my goodness it was hard to watch (no pun intended) that snow duffing you up. Ciao.

    • @nolanreed7090
      @nolanreed7090 4 года назад +2

      Steve Ottavaino There is something about the level of design quality on the IWC Pilots that the competition doesn’t get close to, to my eye. I’m glad there are so many more affordable options from other brands. But, for me, once the details of the better execution really clicked, I knew I would never be happy with any of the IWC alternatives

    • @storck08
      @storck08 4 года назад +1

      Over 5k usd for a sellita movement is a joke. The market agrees so the value on used mark xviii is super low. This watch is worth 3k usd tops because the quality and finishing is good but not a dime more.

    • @MrRoyck10
      @MrRoyck10 4 года назад +1

      Steve Ottavaino such a valid point that you have made about pride in ownership. I own a Mark XVI spitfire and it gives me so much pride to wear it than I get from the most commercialised brand (with the crown symbol). IWC is simple and elegant.

    • @steveottavaino3804
      @steveottavaino3804 4 года назад +1

      storck08 I don’t mean to be disrespectful but the “market” doesn’t dictate what I like or buy, nor does the watch brand or movement. I buy the watches that impress me, could give a rats ass what anyone else thinks; 95 percent of the population could care less also. I don’t flip watches so Rolex resale value is not a factor for me (own a day-date and a two tone sub) though, admittedly, it’s a great characteristic. I don’t know you sir or what your personal taste in watches is or how many you’ve owned but I’ve owned many, stretched for all of them, and have found over time the IWC’s have always been of higher quality and design aesthetic appeal, my taste of course. I’d rate them comparable to Grand Seiko quality, owing a SBGH051 that sits in the safe with other Swiss pieces whilst I wear my IWC’s thank you very much. As for the movement I’ve never experience any issue with one, nor have any of my many watch collecting friends. I can’t say the same for other high line Swiss movements that have given me a severe hair cut when they required premature movement service or failed completely. Not a clue what IWC does to the Sellita movements (a controversial subject) as I’ve not seen one (they run like, well, Swiss watches) but can say they do not feel, wind, nor sound like Sellita movements in Oris watches and I own a number of them. Even the rotor winding is far less noisy, completely unnoticeable on wrist. Again it seems the IWC hate expressed on the net is not founded in objective measure but subjectively by non owners. If you don’t like IWC’s or Sellita movements that’s understandable, don’t buy them, but there’s no need to bash them either unless you have some personal experience to back it up with. Perhaps you do and can share it. I have 2 Mark XVIII’s so know of what I speak, with 40 years of premier Swiss brand comparative experience I believe I’m qualified to write on subject. All that said thank you for your comment. Be well. Ciao.

  • @jessecohen3634
    @jessecohen3634 2 года назад

    It’s simplicity is why it’s great. I love a watch that’s clean and unassuming and tells you what time it is. This might be one of the best tool watches on the market.

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 2 года назад

      I have one and for me it's the best watch out there, highly underrated.

  • @saudade369
    @saudade369 Год назад +1

    Honest to its self it has no decoration to distract . It has confidence and it is beautiful because of this I think ?

  • @britannia2129
    @britannia2129 4 года назад +11

    Been waiting for this one. My dad’s been an IWC guy since the seventies and I’ve inherited the bug. Love the channel, Adrian, and I’d love to see a review of the new Portuguiser if possible

  • @nobass_stub1394
    @nobass_stub1394 4 года назад +2

    I can't help but bloody smile every time you post new content. It's more than informative.. more than being honest with opinions.. more than exquisite photo and video capture... It's just bloody entertaining!

  • @ericjensen8954
    @ericjensen8954 2 года назад

    I bought a new Rolex Datejust 36 in 2021 after having a Tutor Submariner for 42 years. I was initially fine with the Rolex. But I am 63 years old and was having trouble reading the time because there are no numerals on the dial. Also the luminescence on small hands in the Datejust made reading the time at night impossible. So I took it back and went to a IWC Pilot Mark 18 AND a Tutor Black Bay Blue 58 for basically the same money. Very happy with both. But the IWC quality and simplicity is going to work for me when I am 85 years old and beyond. Impressed with the product of both watches. Advice to Rolex - you need a watch line that is easier to read. The IWC Pilot is stunning in its simplicity and tasteful presentation.

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 2 года назад +1

      I have both iwc mark 18 and tudor bb58, the tudor is for sale, doesn't get any wrist time, the iwc is the only watch you need.

    • @ericjensen8954
      @ericjensen8954 2 года назад +1

      @@coffeeboyclips1973 yes I understand your point. Since I bought both, i find that I am favouring the IWC. But I am in the bush and in lakes much of my time. I had a Tudor Submariner for over 40 years and it was a rock. So I need both. But I am digging the IWC as a 64 year old guy who is far sighted and can immediately tell the time without glasses on. I could not see the time with my Rolex Datejust 36.

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 2 года назад

      @@ericjensen8954 yeah, the tudor is more rugged and better around water but the iwc just oozes class and looks amazing for a simple design.

  • @jamesmason4420
    @jamesmason4420 2 года назад +2

    been going back and watching your older videos... absolutely enjoyed this one... pilot watches are so amazing in the simplicity.

  • @mozebulbulia
    @mozebulbulia 4 года назад +3

    One thing I also learnt from this video, wear Salamon boots not Timberland in serious terrain. Adrian always teaching us new stuff.
    Oh and don't forget to wear a Barbour jacket !

  • @1000lightyrs
    @1000lightyrs 4 года назад +1

    Got a Mark XVI and it's outlast every other watch I've bought in the last 10 years, including 114270 (2 of them) and 214270 Mk2
    The Mark's are "simply" special!

    • @fifthpint4571
      @fifthpint4571 4 года назад

      1000lightyrs that’s interesting. I’ve just left a comment above saying that I don’t think I’d wear a Mark XVIII over my 214270 Mk2. But there honestly is something about IWC that I really like. Maybe I’ll go second hand and see how things pan out.

  • @HarryJoiner
    @HarryJoiner 4 года назад +3

    i owned one of these and loved it. i think mine was a mark xvi. so glad they went to a 40mm

  • @grahambowes756
    @grahambowes756 4 года назад +3

    I've got the Mark XVI which is a tad smaller at 39mm and has a decorated ETA movement. I love it and agree on strap choice. Great classic watches that appropriately fly under the radar.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 Год назад +2

      The eta movements are more universal meaning easier to repair and service.

  • @gregsinclair8779
    @gregsinclair8779 2 года назад

    Just been introduced to B&J by my son so catching up on past videos. I bought a really good fake Mark XVI in China which lasted about four years, and promised myself I would buy a real one when it expired. I almost bought a Mark XVII but could just not get over the three date window and really thought the Mark XVI looked sooo much better. I eventually bought used but mint Mark XVI for £2k and it is my go-to, favourite watch. Love the simplicity of the dial and 39mm size is perfect. Also prefer the symmetry of the XVI dial with the missing 3,6 and 9. I think IWC have made a mistake putting the 6 and 9 back on the dial but hey, that’s just me. I get loads of comments about the watch, whether worn casual or smart. Love it.

  • @johnbell1859
    @johnbell1859 4 года назад +1

    The plainness is the beauty of this type of watch. 🇬🇧

  • @Fischi4711
    @Fischi4711 4 года назад +1

    Brave man - hiking through the cold mountains and simultaneous reviewing a luxury item. More interesting than somebody just sitting at his desk. Keep up with the good work.

  • @alfredfrome9455
    @alfredfrome9455 4 года назад +1

    I agree with what you say about the strap my IWC came on a black croc grain which I replaced with the top gun strap, has a subtle sailcloth look and is a very dark grey/black colour and looks great imo. Thanks for featuring IWC,

  • @wernerjacq
    @wernerjacq 4 года назад +6

    Love the watch. Simple perfection. Tried the white one, fell in love immediately. BUT can NOT swallow the asking price with that movement and the simple finishing & dial printing. I can not believe you did not mention the price and whether it’s justified. It’s a 2000 ish € watch.

  • @InGratitudeIam
    @InGratitudeIam 4 года назад

    The position of the date window makes it easier to find the date quickly. Less discernment required.
    "They have snow that hurts your face..." Brilliant. That's what microscopic ice cubes travelling at high speeds do.

  • @sdm107
    @sdm107 4 года назад +28

    The asking price is jaw dropping for what I consider a very basic watch with an off the shelf movement.

  • @qchang09
    @qchang09 4 года назад +42

    Have you looked at the Stowa Fliegers? Quite classy finishing with blued hands. They have a 36mm version at a fraction of the price of that IWC

    • @jurajbrugos6411
      @jurajbrugos6411 4 года назад +4

      Exactly Stowa would be my pick over this anytime.

    • @blackwater2100
      @blackwater2100 4 года назад +3

      Just picked up a Stowa flieger and it's the real deal. A fantastic value for the money and I was able to select one of three movements. Went with the handwind!

    • @FirstDonkie
      @FirstDonkie 4 года назад +2

      Agreed! I do not see the difference in quality. The Stowa being much cheaper and also in 40mm makes it an easy choice for me

    • @nevillegrimshaw7758
      @nevillegrimshaw7758 4 года назад +3

      Couldn’t agree more! Stowa all the way. I’ve had my eye on the 36mm marine classic roman for sometime now. They look like excellent quality and value for the money 👍🇬🇧

    • @j.burgess4459
      @j.burgess4459 4 года назад +3

      Yeah, the Stowa Flieger 36mm would definitely be better value and (just maybe) it's a better watch too.

  • @jeanlefranc3817
    @jeanlefranc3817 4 года назад +1

    Exactly my kind of watch. I have no issue with the Sellita movement, provided it keeps accurate time. With a few more hours of power reserve and 100 meter depth rating, would be perfect.

  • @devonortiz88
    @devonortiz88 4 года назад

    Love this watch. IWC shows off its class with this no fuss, no frills dial

  • @ez4086
    @ez4086 4 года назад +7

    Great video..love the IWC pilot watches and I’m glad they’ll introduce in house movements to more of them..honestly doesn’t make sense in 2020 charging that kind of money for a selita or eta movement

  • @markmcdonnell
    @markmcdonnell 4 года назад +9

    "If I was to nitpick ...which I'm going to do" 😂

  • @Numb3r_47
    @Numb3r_47 4 года назад +7

    Beautiful watch!

  • @tantu2395
    @tantu2395 4 года назад +1

    A real classic, like a expensive painting from a famous artist. A field watch that for enthusiast group, but not for the real explorer.

  • @hammalamiri12
    @hammalamiri12 4 года назад +92

    Excellent video, Adrian - I simply can't understand IWC's pricing strategy , they are quite high for what they are, I really like the spitfire but opted for an Oris big crown pro pilot for under a £1000

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад +14

      I do agree, I think it’s doubly hard for IWC because they have developed a decent “affordable” in house movement.

    • @robertschmidt9584
      @robertschmidt9584 4 года назад +2

      Hammal Amiri one used can be had for under $3500 easily. Even then, that might not be to some people’s preferences.

    • @hammalamiri12
      @hammalamiri12 4 года назад +3

      @John Benedict i appreciate their heritage, just learnt they offer an 8 year warranty which is pretty cool. Maybe an extra strap and a 20 percent discount i might get one

    • @UGA.D
      @UGA.D 4 года назад +13

      Laco, Stowa and Archimede each make excellent watches very similar to this one (Laco and Stowa were 2 of the 5 original A-Dial manufacturers along with IWC, Wempe and ALS) for a lot less than the IWC.

    • @scottparis6355
      @scottparis6355 4 года назад +1

      @@UGA.D Would be interesting to directly compare one each of those four brands (Laco, Stowa, Archimede and IWC) and see if you can find £3000 of added value in the IWC.
      And, yes, IWC has no more "history" that Laco or Stowa.

  • @robertn3121
    @robertn3121 4 года назад

    Adrian, I appreciate the fact that you review a wide range of watches without engaging in endless Rolex bashing. I also applaud the fact that you have not limited you discussion of Rolex alternatives to Seiko, which seems to be the cause celeb of many of your colleagues on RUclips....

  • @sdamico555
    @sdamico555 4 года назад

    The IWC Pilots watches like my Spitfire can best be described as a simple thing done very well. And that my friends, is no faint praise. Where IWC shines is in the details, the precision of the brushing, and the tiny highly polished chamfers.

  • @lesliechua5535
    @lesliechua5535 4 года назад +1

    I got myself a Stowa flieger 40mm without logo and date with the FL23883 engraving plus cosc movement for about $1150 back in 2003. Seems like a much better deal to me.

  • @verykeen2please
    @verykeen2please 4 года назад

    nice and easy to read in a snow storm, nice boots, no jeans and a good hat for the transition North. As my eyesight now gets some over 50 age deterioration and my hair recedes, I have been much more of a fan of large, easy to read dials, and hats - enjoy

  • @Valera_Scotland
    @Valera_Scotland 4 года назад

    Yes - get a hat and a gaiter to fight off that deadly ice/snow stuff attacking your face!! (You have midges to look forward to in the spring and summer!)..... And keep doing what you're doing with those Scottish outdoor locations - makes for a great viewing experience. This is what makes your videos very special.

  • @calumpatondrone
    @calumpatondrone 4 года назад +4

    'I might not have a face' - glad to see you're settling into Scotland! Time to goretex up!! Great video :)

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад +2

      Haha. Yeah I need to be more prepared and get some real outdoor clothing. 👍🏻

  • @taisoon91
    @taisoon91 4 года назад +1

    i feel like IWC gets a lot of stick because it's a swiss watch brand that doesn't have a fancy swiss sounding name (i.e. french/italian/german).
    i find their entire pilot's collection absolutely amazing regardless of whether it's just the basic Mark XVIII or the Spitfires/Top Guns. aesthetically very pleasing.

  • @johnwhite.762
    @johnwhite.762 4 года назад

    Thank you very much for the weather report the pretty dark clouds at 8:33 are Nimbostratus and the watch review is most excellent

  • @viperkil13
    @viperkil13 4 года назад +10

    Love this watch, better than the Hamilton khaki in my opinion. Also welcome to Scotland I'm in the highlands and loving the deep snow!

    • @larry.l
      @larry.l 4 года назад +1

      viperkil13 can you elaborate how is it better than the Hamilton please!

    • @viperkil13
      @viperkil13 4 года назад

      @@larry.l the aesthetic to me is more pleasing, seems softer yet delivers the same info on the dial. Move that date window a little outwards and it my near perfect watch. Not a popular opinion I know but its mine ha.

    • @mikec3454
      @mikec3454 4 года назад +2

      Aesthetics is of course subjective so you're absolutely entitled to that. Let's not forget the price of the IWC compared to the Hamilton. I would take a Sinn 556 over the IWC personally ... and likely the Hamilton Khaki Field with the new H50 movement. The pricing on the IWC barely makes any sense.

    • @viperkil13
      @viperkil13 4 года назад

      To all here, price wise yes its mental however looks alone I'm not sure there is a nicer looking field watch. Did not realise I would split opinion so hard Haha. Regards

    • @mikec3454
      @mikec3454 4 года назад +1

      viperkil13 the IWC is more a flieger than it is a field watch. Have you see the Stowa Flieger? It’s a way better value - offered in different sizes and options for hand winding movement or automatic. You’re getting the exact same level of pedigree with Stowa too considering they both made flieger watches for the German Air Force during WWII, which is where this flieger style originates. So, there are nicer flieger watches ... it’s a pretty standard design, there is nothing unique about this IWC.

  • @suigong3841
    @suigong3841 2 года назад

    I bought one for my first ever mechanic watch after viewing this video. Thank you Adrian

  • @ruadhagainagaidheal9398
    @ruadhagainagaidheal9398 Год назад

    I’ve just ordered one of those on a steel bracelet, can’t wait to get it on my wrist. I see you’re in my neck of the woods now. Winter’s best - no midges !

  • @1967plymgtx
    @1967plymgtx 4 года назад +1

    Thanks for the review and the trip outdoors.....love the “travel” aspect of your channel. I really like the IWC, and most likely primarily because of the simplicity.

  • @bjjrhino
    @bjjrhino 4 года назад +8

    Well done, I am a fan of IWC. Any chance of reviewing the Big Pilot?

  • @RotbartCaptain
    @RotbartCaptain 4 года назад +1

    Do you know if we can expect any new mark models from iwc on the upcoming Basel World? Are there any leaks or rumours? Love the mark xviii le petit prince .. but the eta movement ... Nah .. hope they put an iwc in-house movement into the le petit prince. Like they already did with the spitfire.

  • @shipmate3577
    @shipmate3577 4 года назад +117

    I just can't see buying this over a simple Hamilton Kkaki for 1/10 the price. IWC needs to do something or they are going to go the way of Breitling.

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад +20

      I have a hunch they have a few things up their sleeves. I but I do agree, they need to up their game.

    • @jaskey
      @jaskey 4 года назад +11

      I really like the watch, but the price really does kill it. Comparing what else I can get new or used for that, I'll never get around to owning it.

    • @diminicus9999
      @diminicus9999 4 года назад +13

      Or a Stowa Flieger 36. Smaller diameter, blued hands, original flieger manufacturer and I feel looks better without the logo

    • @diminicus9999
      @diminicus9999 4 года назад +2

      And pardon me, available without a date

    • @DavidSmith-zu6eu
      @DavidSmith-zu6eu 4 года назад +5

      I was just going to recommend a Khaki Auto for way less.

  • @MrBrianc1975
    @MrBrianc1975 4 года назад +1

    That's dedication to your art, going up a mountain to show a watch! I love it, especially as it's got a date which I find the most useful complication, much more useful than a chronograph. I know it has aviation in its roots but it would look cracking in 36mm.

  • @B00MIS
    @B00MIS 4 года назад +3

    Great video. I think a SINN would be a better buy

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 4 года назад

      Yes, but your watch dial wouldn't read "IWC". That must count for something?

  • @cmiller7299
    @cmiller7299 4 года назад +1

    People pay more for IWC for the same reason people pay more for Rolex or for anything else. For everyone mentioning Oris and Hamilton there's a Timex wearer saying the same thing. It's not about the movement or value. It's how it makes your feel and, at this price, the social status it conveys. You're going to feel more at home in affluent circles with an IWC on the wrist that the other watches that are mentioned in these comments.

  • @jjjensn
    @jjjensn 4 года назад +1

    If you are worried about the size and coating go for the Mark XV. It has all of the qualities you mention but with a better (modified) ETA movement, allegedly, and a 38mm case

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад

      Awesome. I’ll have to check that out. Cheers. 👍🏻

  • @gscraggster6553
    @gscraggster6553 4 года назад

    Credit to you, I think the style and delivery of the content, totally works, even though I don’t like the watch, not value for money. I still stuck it out to the end. Good job pal.

  • @lukemayor718
    @lukemayor718 4 года назад +2

    Really good video Adrian, I havent owned an IWC but tried a few on and with my 40th on the horizon I have an IWC in my short listings. I don't own an explorer or an IWC but given the choice to own one I would choose the IWC. And the reason being is that you don't see them on wrists, they are rare and when I do see a person wearing one I feel as though they are probably a watch enthusiast who would be happy to have a chat about watches vs your Joey Essex character in the 'Bubble Lounge' or whatever horrid bar is now the place to be who is wearing a Rolex just because but knows fook all about them. I'm not a Rolex hater as I love them but loads of knobs also love them where an IWC I feel your in a safe cosy watch club where you can give the next IWC person a wink and they know the score

  • @jipke
    @jipke 2 года назад +1

    For about a quarter of the price, I'd buy a Stowa classic flieger. Open caseback, decorated movement, heat-blued hands. Beautiful.

  • @kennypetrowski
    @kennypetrowski 4 года назад +3

    Bought a Stowa Classic 40 with blued hands, ETA movement, & gorgeous display back for quarter of price of this IWC and couldn’t be happier. Similar heritage, still made in the Black Forrest, gorgeous piece. I think the details are even nicer than the IWC.

  • @johnb5099
    @johnb5099 4 года назад

    Great video Adrian. The IWC satisfies the watch enthusiast in me and to see you in pain at the end satisfied the sadist in me. What more could I ask for.

  • @vitvel
    @vitvel 4 года назад

    I'd like to get my hands on the white dial. I think the Mark XVIII is a gorgeous watch. Glad you liked it. That's one of my grails.

  • @johnayres2303
    @johnayres2303 4 года назад

    I have a Mark XV from new and I never tire of it.

  • @musicguy595
    @musicguy595 4 года назад +1

    So happy you did a vid on this watch - I'm paying off my student loans this year and then buying this watch for myself (but the LPP version with a blue dial!)

    • @1100evo
      @1100evo 4 года назад

      musicguy595 good Choice! I bought this 3 years ago! Beautiful watch...the blue dial is magnificent

  • @patrickjean-philippe7679
    @patrickjean-philippe7679 2 года назад

    I have 3 IWC, I like these although like everything these are not perfect. I have the 1941 B.Uhr 52 S.C which is the genuine period flight deck watch / pilot watch, then the 2006 Spitfire Doppelchronograph on tan brown alligator and the 2006 limited Ceramic Doppelchronograph (not a Top Gun) which cases were made by a dentistry prothesis company... The thing which annoys me is that the day and date typo are different to the dial typo... but it is often the case for many watches. The 2006 Doppelchronograph are based on a modified ETA/Valjoux 7750 calibre which was significantly modified and refinished by IWC and to which a custom made rattrapante module was added. The advantage with these calibres is that these are workhorses and highly reliable...

  • @dereklorimer1914
    @dereklorimer1914 4 года назад +1

    Just bought Le Petit Prince edition and love it

    • @bebibogyooo
      @bebibogyooo 3 года назад +1

      Me too ... it is just stunning ...

  • @lacivagyoken
    @lacivagyoken 4 года назад +3

    another world-class intro, bravo Adrian

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад +1

      Thanks so much mate. 👍🏻

  • @ultramagnus7842
    @ultramagnus7842 8 месяцев назад

    Really appreciate that you went above and beyond to give us something different with this outdoor-wilderness setting, but it pains my heart to see you suffer in that cold hardh environment 😅 The Mark XVIII is a great watch imo. It looks great on your wrist. Not a fan of the blueish/purpleish tint on the crystal, dont like the date being too far off the periphery. Nice watch but probably not for me.

  • @jarose1125
    @jarose1125 4 года назад +1

    Love the look of the watch. I’ve wanted one for a while. Went to the AD and tried it on. I love the feel and fit. I just can’t seem to get over the mental roadblock of paying 4,500+ for a piece with this Sellita movement.

  •  4 года назад +1

    I love this watch. It only has one, BIG, flaw and that is the lume, or lack thereof. They should have filled all the numerals and hour markings with as much lume as possible. The watch is designed to be legible and it should be legible even in dark enviroments!

  • @kingjgregory
    @kingjgregory 4 года назад

    I respect IWC as a brand that produces well made luxury watches. Historically, don't think it's a brand that has appealed to me much. Thanks for the video, Adrian. Nice looking watch. Maybe I'll have to check one out again soon.

  • @charlesc9653
    @charlesc9653 4 года назад +1

    Liking the way this channel is going and seeing how it’s developing.
    I know it’ll be expensive but sometimes simple is what you need. If it’s bomb proof and never skip a beat then you could justify it. I agree with the strap though, it needs a more relaxed strap that’s for sure!

  • @mateo...
    @mateo... 4 года назад +1

    Looks awesome, especially on that brown leather strap

  • @giuliomariamagnelli4459
    @giuliomariamagnelli4459 4 года назад +1

    Could the IWC spitfire be the solution to the size and date window ‘problems’ you mentioned?

  • @autonomy_
    @autonomy_ 4 года назад +1

    Great video Adrian. This style of video is my favorite!

  • @Gordi4568365
    @Gordi4568365 4 года назад +3

    Great looking watch, and a great review. Would prefer their Spitfire with their in-house movement though 😀😎👍🏼👍🏼

  • @tobytayles1
    @tobytayles1 2 года назад +1

    It’s stunning I want it

  • @ClaxtonBay123
    @ClaxtonBay123 4 года назад +3

    I don't understand why a watch with a Selita 300 costs 4Grand. What am I buying? Especially in the Pilot watch space. This vs a Stowa Flieger Classic?

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 4 года назад

      Your buying into the brand, the history and the prestige of owning an "IWC".

  • @tezzanewton
    @tezzanewton 4 года назад +4

    Nice watch but my Stowa cost heaps less, for the same bang.

  • @terry7441
    @terry7441 4 года назад +2

    Good review. I do enjoy the minimalist look here and the date execution is one of the best available, but I think I'd go for a modern Stowa fliegler over the IWC. They're so stark, and the model that is without branding is a statement. They also have a pretty cool GMT.
    If I'm looking for a more visually interesting watch, then it's the IWC spitfire.

  • @likeris2
    @likeris2 4 года назад +2

    great video, great watch. now I am happy. well done.

    • @BarkandJack
      @BarkandJack  4 года назад +2

      Thanks so much buddy. Glad you liked it. 👍🏻

  • @chiangning80
    @chiangning80 4 года назад

    Thanks Adrian for this very cool review! I've owned this same watched for two years now and have really enjoyed wearing it personally. Your commentary on the date window is spot on. I've totally enjoyed the symmetry of the dial, the sizing of 40mm on my 7inch wrist just somehow work magically, and I beg to differ on the double coated AR coating. The blue sheen on the crystal gives it a very unique aesthetic I feel and honestly is one of the thing I love about the Mark XVIII.

  • @franciskocum8709
    @franciskocum8709 4 года назад

    I love your stuff. I hope this doesn't sound insulting but I find your videos relaxing and very enjoyable.

  • @MrMortsnerd
    @MrMortsnerd 4 года назад +1

    As a Canuckistani, cold weather is easy to deal with, you simply dress warmly.

  • @kaisoerfjord452
    @kaisoerfjord452 3 года назад

    7:50 What r u talking about, that is a SUPER strap, the black leaather sudden-taper- strap, one of the KEY reasons why I can’t stop looking at it.

  • @sungwaileung
    @sungwaileung 4 года назад

    Totall agree with pushing the date window to the right or reducing the case size to 38mm. I like the Mark series but the awkward date window position has been keeping me away from buying one.

  • @noamroseman4178
    @noamroseman4178 3 года назад

    "snow that hurts your face" Hahah , love the honesty and simplicty of the review.

  • @kyleverson
    @kyleverson 4 года назад

    agreed on the date placement. hoping for a new model this year with in-house movt and symmetrical date.

  • @rickjason215
    @rickjason215 4 года назад +48

    Nice watch. No idea how this is a $4,000 USD watch. I guess they charge what they can get.

    • @tomscott4438
      @tomscott4438 4 года назад +7

      The show is based in the UK and prices are in Pounds Sterling. It's not $4,000 USD, it's $4,090 GBP. Converted, it's actually $5,300 USD.

    • @masoncnc
      @masoncnc 4 года назад +20

      Sinn all day everyday. not sure what the point of this $5K watch is.

    • @IULENZA
      @IULENZA 4 года назад +2

      @@masoncnc Brand, brand, brand.

    • @scottd1342
      @scottd1342 4 года назад +5

      @@masoncnc Totally agree. You can get a Sinn 104 for half the price and it's a brilliant piece of kit.

    • @kaiserphoenix01
      @kaiserphoenix01 4 года назад +3

      Someone needs to pay for all the parties and celebs!

  • @shaverray4462
    @shaverray4462 4 года назад +1

    It’s quite a nice looking watch and I had a closer look at this piece recently. However, given what else of superior or comparable quality is available at or substantially below that price range, the £4K + RRP seemed rather cheeky to me. Not a bad second-hand buy though. Cracking video btw.

  • @Ronaldalan114
    @Ronaldalan114 4 года назад

    The Mark XVlll is one of my favorites. I like the Petite Prince with the stainless steel bracelet. The bracelet is the tightest, most luxurious bracelet in all of horology in my opinion. Great watch and I concur with all of your thoughts. Love it on your strap, I am going to buy one for mine now.

  • @user-mx6me1yv1u
    @user-mx6me1yv1u 4 года назад +1

    Great video ! 👍 More off beat videos like this are appreciated I love IWC.

  • @macoyupadoodle
    @macoyupadoodle 4 года назад +1

    Another problem with this watch is the lume . Lume on just the 12,3,6,and 9 just does not cut it for a watch where legibility is part of the design . They should differentiate themselves from brands like Stowa to justify this price. ............ 100meter WR with a sapphire case back ?

  • @austinzizzi1142
    @austinzizzi1142 2 года назад +1

    The mark xv is my everyday watch

  • @jrlee1031
    @jrlee1031 4 года назад

    Arguably you can get a Hamilton or Oris for the fraction of the price with almost if not the same movement with IWC. But having said that, the 2019 of the Spitfire is already in their in-house movement. Some may say it is a clone of the 7750 Valjoux movment. Yes the configuration of the dial maybe the same, but 46 power reserve, 6 O'clock seconds hand, Anti magnetic case and on top of that the history of the Spitfire itself. Possibly the best fighter plane that once flew the skies. You pay a premium for its history.
    I like the vision of the new CEO, Christoph Grainger is doing. And I'm truly excited on what IWC has to offer come Watch and Wonders.
    Now to quickly go back to this watch, yes it does have a Selitta movment, but it is modified by IWC to achieve chronometre standards.

  • @danec1384
    @danec1384 4 года назад

    What a back drop for the video! Love this watch but the more I look at it, the more I think that I want a Sinn 556..