What a treat! Not seeing any Satsang's from Roger Castillo on his RUclips channel for the past six months, I have really began to miss them and his teachings. Thank you Walter for bringing Roger on your channel. Although underrated today, I believe Roger will someday be looked back upon fondly as one of the great pioneers in the forward evolution of human spirituality and development.
I feel the same. Through some dismal years I eventually got to yoga, then sam Harris meditation, next eckhart tolle to Rupert Spira and now Roger. These days humble, often happy and I can never get enough of this guy! Roger thank you for all the videos. Life lines!
I'm glad Roger has enough wisdom to understand the radical message IS a teaching. That it's implicit and inherent within the setup of itself, DESPITE the words: "this isn't a teaching". Something so fresh to hear people not radicalize themselves within a certain language ruleset as if it's another religion.
Not a teaching in that there is nothing to do to get anywhere, anywhere to go, or anyone to get there. With that, there is no teaching anywhere, by anyone, ever. So then this is not a teaching either. Just apparent happening.
@@yoso585 but that is just your understanding, which can be incorrect, and as you said you can’t know that since the knowing is illusory. Same goes for Rogers point of view.
Roger same like everyone else has his implicit bias, so his understanding will resonate more with the awareness/ consciousness non duality crowd and not with the Tony Parsons crowd. Both are just forms of understanding. Radical non duality/ Tony Parson crowd will claim that there is no knowing (which may be correct) , yet they will still try to convince you that their understanding about this is correct, same like a person who accepts knowing as something real 😂😂😂
I interpret what we have here as counseling. In that, a teaching. So called “radical nonduality,” on the other hand, is something that truly can not be discussed. I mean, there is nothing to really known to discuss. When those characters say they have nothing for you, seems to me that’s where it begins and ends, never happened.
Those speakers who say there is nothing to discuss, yet they make living of of discussing it 😂. There is nothing to know, but there is different understanding of this topic and each of these people will try to convince you that theirs is correct. But if there is no knowing, why are you convinced that the explanation that you present is the correct one, and not his explanation 🤷
So basically what is my part?..where was "i" selfish, dishonest or afraid? where was the body hungry, angry, lonely, tired..then oh yeah powerlessness over people places things including me
As a few 'liberated' characters have said for the last 2 decades or so, reality without self consciousness is simply and directly all there is, already. It's all hackneyed cliches, but good pointers nonetheless....that there is only the undivided beloved, only oneness, only empty fullness, only nothing everything...only absolute freedom/unconditional love.❤
I'm a great fan of Roger Castillo but one thing I may disagree with is that all our actions are a result of genes and up-to-date conditioning as Ramesh Balsekar taught. Because there may be strong emergence! Meaning things and events that can't be predicted by past events, but other that that I think his teaching is accurate.
@@walterdriscoll4 Okay, if the up to date conditioning can receive new inputs, such as creativity. The idea of strong emergence is tricky, because if it exists it's difficult to prove, because there may be unknown ordinary weak emergence causes that can explain it without the need for strong emergence.
Also so grateful for the reminder of teaching as concepts! “The only Truth in the manifestation is the impersonal sense of I am.” 🫠 This really assists in release from seeking. ❤
What a treat! Not seeing any Satsang's from Roger Castillo on his RUclips channel for the past six months, I have really began to miss them and his teachings. Thank you Walter for bringing Roger on your channel.
Although underrated today, I believe Roger will someday be looked back upon fondly as one of the great pioneers in the forward evolution of human spirituality and development.
I feel the same. Through some dismal years I eventually got to yoga, then sam Harris meditation, next eckhart tolle to Rupert Spira and now Roger. These days humble, often happy and I can never get enough of this guy! Roger thank you for all the videos. Life lines!
Fantastic ❤ I’ve been listening to Roger daily for about four years and anxiety to serenity is the result. Thank you 🙏
that’s life’s will or as Ramesh would say Gods will and the destiny of that body mind organism ❤️
@@walterdriscoll4 ❤️
I really appreciated Roger’s story of losing peace of mind through expectation of a perpetual oneness experience 🙏🏻
Love Roger, thank you!❤🙏
I'm glad Roger has enough wisdom to understand the radical message IS a teaching. That it's implicit and inherent within the setup of itself, DESPITE the words: "this isn't a teaching". Something so fresh to hear people not radicalize themselves within a certain language ruleset as if it's another religion.
Not a teaching in that there is nothing to do to get anywhere, anywhere to go, or anyone to get there. With that, there is no teaching anywhere, by anyone, ever. So then this is not a teaching either. Just apparent happening.
@@yoso585 but that is just your understanding, which can be incorrect, and as you said you can’t know that since the knowing is illusory. Same goes for Rogers point of view.
Roger same like everyone else has his implicit bias, so his understanding will resonate more with the awareness/ consciousness non duality crowd and not with the Tony Parsons crowd. Both are just forms of understanding. Radical non duality/ Tony Parson crowd will claim that there is no knowing (which may be correct) , yet they will still try to convince you that their understanding about this is correct, same like a person who accepts knowing as something real 😂😂😂
his teacher Ramesh Balsekar called his concepts a teaching.
life is just a series of happenings
I interpret what we have here as counseling. In that, a teaching. So called “radical nonduality,” on the other hand, is something that truly can not be discussed. I mean, there is nothing to really known to discuss. When those characters say they have nothing for you, seems to me that’s where it begins and ends, never happened.
Yes I agree, thank you for your comment!
Those speakers who say there is nothing to discuss, yet they make living of of discussing it 😂. There is nothing to know, but there is different understanding of this topic and each of these people will try to convince you that theirs is correct. But if there is no knowing, why are you convinced that the explanation that you present is the correct one, and not his explanation 🤷
@@ccr7712off with your head!
So basically what is my part?..where was "i" selfish, dishonest or afraid? where was the body hungry, angry, lonely, tired..then oh yeah powerlessness over people places things including me
As a few 'liberated' characters have said for the last 2 decades or so, reality without self consciousness is simply and directly all there is, already. It's all hackneyed cliches, but good pointers nonetheless....that there is only the undivided beloved, only oneness, only empty fullness, only nothing everything...only absolute freedom/unconditional love.❤
There is no such thing as 'Radical" Not Two. Just teachers radically 'attaching' their own 'legs to the snake'.
I'm a great fan of Roger Castillo but one thing I may disagree with is that all our actions are a result of genes and up-to-date conditioning as Ramesh Balsekar taught. Because there may be strong emergence! Meaning things and events that can't be predicted by past events, but other that that I think his teaching is accurate.
I think up to date conditioning covers that
@@walterdriscoll4 Okay, if the up to date conditioning can receive new inputs, such as creativity. The idea of strong emergence is tricky, because if it exists it's difficult to prove, because there may be unknown ordinary weak emergence causes that can explain it without the need for strong emergence.
Very interesting!
Also so grateful for the reminder of teaching as concepts! “The only Truth in the manifestation is the impersonal sense of I am.” 🫠 This really assists in release from seeking. ❤
Do I have a brain or not? 🤷♂️
Doesn’t seem like it 😂😂😂
I don’t think that any of us have one 😂😂😂
You have a brain, but there is no you 🤷🏼