I just discovered your channel a few days ago and am astounded by the quality and production values, not to mention your commentary and skills on court. You put in the work and it shows! Thank you, and keep up the great work. Best wishes from Dubai
I have been searching for a new racket to replace my 28 year old Head racket as I am getting back into tennis again. Been shopping around and heard about the Wilson Clash from different websites , as a great racket for a player of my caliber (3.0). Watched quite a few videos and then I stumbled upon your excellent video. Very unbiased review and great attention to detail when filming. It is now on my Christmas list. Cheers from Canada.
Hi Ken - thank you for taking the time to share, and it's great to hear my video helped in your evaluation of the Clash. I hope it shows up under the tree for you 😄
@@TennisCompanion Hey there thanks for the response - demoed a bunch of rackets - decided I liked the Clash pro the best - debating on strings - demoed with poly and liked it a lot although I normally only played multis like NRG2 - shop recommended the Luxilon rough
Luxilon ALU Power or Rough are both great starting points for a full poly setup in the Clash. A few notes you might find useful: - Polyester can be addicting because freshly strung, they do their job well, but they are higher maintenance, so I'd expect to bump your stringing frequency, especially since you're coming to the Clash with some elbow concerns. A dead poly can wreak havoc on a player's arm. Cost of stringing isn't an issue for everyone, but worth considering if you haven't played them for extended periods. - I've played the Clash with a full poly and hybrid setup, and they both perform well. I like the hybrid because it offers extra comfort while extending the life of the strings overall and plenty of topspin with the poly in the mains. If you enjoyed NRG2, that's a great option to pair with a poly like Luxilon. - Keeping it within the Luxilon family, these strings are worth checking out: Luxilon 4G, Luxilon Element, Luxilon Smart. That would be my order of preference among the three airing on the side of a slight bit extra comfort, which is relative in the world of polys, with ALU Power at the top of the list. Good luck with the selection - I hope you find something you enjoy while keeping that arm in good health!
Simple, easy to follow, and very well-produced video. I used to play tennis regularly as a kid and am picking the sport back up (for the last 3 months now) and am looking to upgrade from my Costco racquet. Given that I generally play topspin from the base and rarely go to the net, this seems like the right fit for me. Do you have a recommendation on String (I am leaning poly) and tension for this racquet? I am fine with re-stringing costs.
fantastic review.. about tecnique...i would improve the no dominant arm on the forehand..compact backhand ( with another grip you will have more spin) , great volley , and fast serve.. congratulations..a 360 degree vision of tennis...
Hi Savas - the recommended string tension for the Wilson Clash 100 is 47 - 57 lbs (21 - 26 kgs), so finding somewhere toward the middle of that range is a great place to start. Then, based on your experience, you can modify up or down to your preference. For my playtest, I strung a hybrid at 50 lbs in the mains and 52 lbs in the crosses, which worked well. Since then, I've bumped that up a few pounds for added control with this racquet. To learn more about tension, you might consider checking out my video on the topic: ruclips.net/video/dNabsAmlLOw/видео.html As for brands of strings to consider, there are plenty of excellent options, but it depends on the type of string or the specific performance characteristics you'd prefer. If your curious, you can check out some of my top picks here: tenniscompanion.org/best-tennis-strings/ If you'd like to learn a bit more about the different types of strings and why you'd opt for one over another, here are a few additional resources I've created that you might find useful: Types of Strings: ruclips.net/video/OflCsTM6y8w/видео.html String Gauge: ruclips.net/video/OolgTCYQH1s/видео.html Multifilaments: ruclips.net/video/7XN3F0F4ypE/видео.html Polys: ruclips.net/video/_ot-QQiFDSU/видео.html I recognize you might have wanted a more specific string recommendation, but it's tricky to do so without more info, so I'm a big fan of helping guide players to make a choice that works for them. I hope that helps - best of luck!
Targeted video in RUclips. Tennis, tennis reviews, and San Diego. Love it! Now, if you can just make a screenshot with a Volkl or PK (my racquets of choice) next to carne asada fries (or burrito-I’m not picky) at the beach, I’d appreciate it. Thanks.
Thank you for your great review. I was wondering what is the ball machine and base you used to simulate serving and returning at around the 5:52 mark? Thank you.
@@TennisCompanion I see so not any special base. Just one that can move the ball machine higher so can angle the ball into the service box. Thank you for you speedy reply and keep up your great reviews. I will subscribe and make sure to like your videos. May I suggest a review of the Yonex Ezone 98 Tour. I just switched to that a few weeks back.
Exactly - nothing too fancy on the base, but it works pretty well. It's something I want to work on enhancing over time because, at its current height, I'm limited on the speed settings while still keeping the ball in the service box. Thank you for the support and racquet suggestion too!
@@TennisCompanion It does not need to be as long as it gets the job done. I think that was smart and being resourceful. I have only seen few tennis ball machines that can serve like the Ace attack and there was this other one I cannot remember that can serve up-to 10' and can do kick serves. But those are more for clubs or someone with a private court. I am going to try to find a base to do this too. Thank you for your idea.
Great review and video. Do you recommend it for a beginner? And what type of strings (in case it’s different from the ones you put on) do you recommend for beginner? I will really appreciate it.
Hi there! Great video production! Thanks for the information Wich racket you think it´s best, Clash 100 (295 grams) or the Pro Staff RF L (290 grams)? I´m a baseliner player, and I usually play with a lot of topspin. Other question: do you think that the Clash 100 ir a really revolutionary racket in the industry of Tennis or it´s just a Wilson Company advertisement for the selling of this racket? Thanks!
Thanks, Carlos! I think both the Clash 100 and the Pro Staff 97L can be the best for different players - it really depends on the individual's wants and needs. As a baseline player who hits with a lot of topspin, the Clash 100, with its larger 100 in² (645 cm²) head size, which opens up the 16x19 string pattern, will offer more significant topspin potential compared to the Pro Staff 97. However, what distinguishes these two racquets further is their feel. With its ultra-low stiffness, the Clash has a unique response that's different from most racquets, while the Pro Staff has a more traditional feel. I wouldn't say one is better, just different. I realize it's not always possible, but if you could demo these, I think you'd quickly find a preference. I can certainly see why Wilson would claim the Clash as a revolutionary racquet because we haven't seen a modern racquet that flexes and responds quite the way the Clash does - it makes for exciting marketing. However, I wouldn't describe the racquet as revolutionary and instead would describe the racquet's construction and materials as innovative.
I have a clash too and currently put Luxilon alu power on it. Did you have the chance to try Luxilon Smart on Clash? Wilson says Smart has that magic effect and could pair with Clash in low tension?
Hi Deng, yes, I have since had the opportunity to hit with the Clash using Luxilon Smart. It's a softer poly that offers players a bit more comfort and a subtle dynamic response depending on the swing speed and style, but I prefer Luxilon ALU Power. If you are considering softer polys, then it's certainly a reasonable starting point for the Clash. If not, I think most players will prefer the performance of a stiffer poly from Luxilon.
Another great video. It’s so confusing to many, but it would be nice to get a comparison between the new Yonex Ezone 100 2020 model vs the model before it. Believe it is the Ezone 100 2018 which was made in blue and black or lime and black ( two choices ). Calling the Ezone Blue is where the confusion lies, as the 2020 version is actually blue. Real muck up Yonex!
Thanks again, Edward! I appreciate the suggestion as well. The Yonex EZONE 100 is on my list for a review, so at some point, I may be able to get to a more direct comparison between these two generations.
Top notch video as usual. Did you get a chance to compare Clash 100 to Clash Tour, and if so - how would you compare their stability, especially on the net?
Thanks, Edmon! I have played with the Clash Tour as well, and it does bump up stability - it's not dramatic, but it helps. It's a 14 gram or half-ounce difference between the two, but the addition of weight for the Tour skews toward the handle. The Clash 100 is 7pts HL strung, while the Clash Tour 100 comes in at 9pts HL.
I was considering this racquet after demoing a friend’s. What would be the specs for the strings that you would recommend for an intermediate player? Great video!
Thanks, Katherine! String selection and tension involves quite a bit of personal preference, so my recommendations will vary between players. With that said, my choice for the Wilson Clash is either a hybrid or full poly string setup. I like the hybrid for the Clash because it offers a nice blend between comfort/feel of the multifilament and topspin from the poly while maintaining solid, yet not overbearing, power. Here's what I used for my review, which worked great: Mains: Luxilon ALU Power at 50 lbs (22.7kg) Crosses: Wilson NXT at 52 lbs (23.6kg) However, to maximize topspin and durability, I'd string with a full poly setup, which would offer less comfort and put the onus on me to generate power (and topspin) by swinging faster. A few videos of mine that you might find useful to help guide your thinking about what makes the most sense for you are: Types of Tennis Strings [Detailed Explanation + Examples] ruclips.net/video/OflCsTM6y8w/видео.html Tennis String Tension: An In-Depth Guide ruclips.net/video/dNabsAmlLOw/видео.html Tennis String Gauge Explained: Guide + Chart ruclips.net/video/OolgTCYQH1s/видео.html I hope that helps!
TennisCompanion thank you so much for the detailed response. I’m currently playing with babolat pure aero team and i feel like it’s a little too stiff but do like the power from it. I may order a demo of the clash again to give it a real try. Thank you!!!
@@TennisCompanion I've been playing tennis for 3 years now. First, I owned a Babolat Pure Strike, then, looking for more spin and better serves, bought me a Babolat Pure Aero. I thought it was doing a good job. My wife borrom a Wilson Clash 100 and I took it with me to pratice. OMG. Have never given this kind of strokes. I could just let my swing go and my balls were still on court. I'm amazed by it. Great video. Congrats, from Brazil.
@Pedro Xavier - thanks for chiming in with your experience and progression with various racquets! It's great to hear you've been able to experiment, and it sounds like you're learning a lot in the process - that's what it's all about. Cheers to your three years on the court, hopefully, many more to come and happy to hear you liked the video 😄
I am an intermediate player and trying to improve my topspin and volley shots. During winter i experience tennis elbow pain. i currently use a 240gm Head Ti S6 racket currently and want to update to a good overall racket to improve my performance. Help me choose a good racket. I was considering Pure drive 2021/pure aero/wilson clash 100. Waiting for your suggestions. Thanks!
Hi Ali - I replied to your comment over on my Babolat Pure Aero 2019 review, so linking it here for anyone who wants to check it out: ruclips.net/video/EgrE162DS6s/видео.html&lc=UgwJRDC-47mu6zyS2uZ4AaABAg Thanks for checking out my videos 😄
is there a different between Wilson Roland Garros Clash 100 and WIlson Clash 100 beside the name? what I mean is the RG made for clay court only? Thanks,
Hi Danny - great question! The only difference between the Wilson Clash 100 and the Rolland Garros Wilson Clash 100 is the paint job - otherwise, they're identical tennis racquets.
Hi coming from a pure strike 16x19 (2019), i would like ti change with the clash 98 or 100 cause i need to solve my constant arm problems and the clash giving up some problems seems like a good opportunity with the amazing balance and low stiffness. I can opt for the 100? Or maybe to light?which one do you recommend between the 3 clash? 98/100/100 tour? Many thanks
Hi Matteo! Sorry to hear about your arm - injuries and discomfort are never easy, and I know overcoming them can often be tricky. Transitioning from the 2019 Babolat Pure Strike 16x19, I'd recommend exploring the Wilson Clash 98 or 100 Tour further. Between the two and based on your current racquet, I think the Clash 98 would be a natural transition, but it's going to deliver a bit less power than your Pure Strike. With that in mind, a hybrid string setup in the Clash 98 could work well for you to recoup a bit of power while maintaining excellent comfort. I'd recommend a quality multifilament in the mains and poly in the crosses. The Clash 100 Tour is a worthy contender if you want a bit more pop, but I'd expect overall you'd be happy with the 98. Best of luck with your arm!
I'm stuck between the Clash 100 and 108, any recommendations out there? I am a beginner that's athletic and learns very quickly. I plan on training a lot using the wall and spending time serving for hours in order to get better. Price is not an issue: I feel like I should get the 108 while I'm still a Beginner, let it carry me up to my mid-level intermediate days, and reevaluate my skill and style and drop big money on another racket. All opinions and constructive criticism are appreciated!
Thanks for the question! The Clash 108 is a reasonable option for beginners that are okay spending the money and looking for a larger head size that will deliver extra margin for error. It's worth noting that it also comes with an extended length, which combined with the larger head size makes for a more powerful spin-friendly racquet. You could always spend less for a starter racquet, which you may outgrow rather quickly if you're practicing a lot, but if that's not a concern, then the Clash 108 is perfectly sufficient.
Great video I recently started playing the Clash 98! Going from a Radical Pro. Soon as I borrowed my friends Clash i went out and bought a couple and sold all my others! Went with Smart at 44pds but not a fan if soft strings at lower tension but inthought give it a good try. In a coup weeks i will string with 4G or poly tour Strike are 52-54
Thank you, Aaryan! To start, here's a high-level overview of both: Wilson Clash Specs/Characteristics - Head: 100 in² / 645 cm² (16x19) - Weight: 11oz / 312g - Balance: 7 pts HL - Swingweight: 312 - Stiffness: 55 - Beam: 24.5mm / 24.5mm / 24.5mm -- - Mid-range power - Mid-range topspin - High comfort Babolat Pure Aero Specs/Characteristics - Head: 100 in² / 645 cm² (16x19) - Weight: 11.2oz / 318g - Balance: 4 pts HL - Swingweight: 324 - Stiffness: 67 - Beam: 23mm / 26mm / 23mm -- - Higher power - Excellent topspin - Lower comfort Both racquets offer user-friendly weights and head light balance for fast swings, making it easier for players to generate racquet head speed - an essential element for producing topspin. Furthermore, they both offer 100 square inch head sizes with open 16x19 string patterns to enhance topspin further. As a result, either can be great options for baseline play, but if topspin and power are a priority, then the Babolat Pure Aero 2019 will deliver above and beyond the Clash. However, where these racquets differ substantially is how they feel - primarily a function of their stiffness. The Pure Aero has a crisp feel, while the Clash has a softer, dampened feel. Neither is better; it's a preference, but if comfort is a priority, the Wilson Clash is an ideal option. Most players who have healthy arms and describe themselves as baseliners would be more inclined to lean towards the Babolat Pure Aero 2019, especially when you tack on Rafael Nadal's endorsement. Ultimately, there is no substitute for demoing or trying racquets first hand. Many in-person and online retailers offer demo programs, so if you can, I'd highly recommend testing them out with my notes in mind. Of course, I recognize demo programs aren't available everywhere, so hopefully, my notes have helped provide some additional context to consider for your decision making since both are well-suited for the task.
Here’s my dilemma. I play with a Wilson Pro Staff RF97 and the regular 97. I’m 53. The RF is just too heavy for me now. I really love how it plays though. The PS97 is good too but it has such a small sweet spot. I have great control with it. I want more forgiveness and a bit more easy power. Something around 300 grams but still has a similar RF solid feel. Would this be a good possibility?
I never recommend anything to anyone as tennis is vey personal but i think that you need to "demo" Head Radical MP 2021 with Luxilon Alu Power at 51 pounds or Volkl Cyclone for crisper feel. The Clash though is the worst racquet i played with. Cool power and comfort but often the ball sails long and have to play consistantly with spin. My personal racquet is Blade v7
My son is currently using a pure strike and I’m entertaining changing it up. I’m researching this racket and others. He likes power, spin, and control. Who doesn’t. But he also likes a bit lighter as he’s just 14. Do you have recommendations?
Does having a swingweight of only 313 and weight of 295 is good for a player with tennis elbow? O play with a Babolat Pure Drive 300 gr and it doesn't seem to help me.. Every time I play I feel the racket is hard to more and my wrist hurts. I'm looking if a.Clash is better, what do you think?
How do you compare this to the Blade 98 16x19 v8 that just came out? Im on the fence, with the new V8 being softer in RA and having some Clashy Flexy DNA tech inserted into it, the racquets feel so darn similar I can't make a decision!
Amazing content and you will soon hit 100k+ subscribers in the next two years. Which one do you recommend btw Clash 100 and Pro Staff RF97 v13 for an intermediate player?
Hi Biakhlei, thanks for the encouragement and support! Without knowing much about a player, my first inclination would be to suggest the Wilson Clash 100, which is significantly more user friendly in its weight and head size, while being perfectly well-suited for an intermediate player. The RF97 v13 is an excellent racquet, but it's heavier and has a smaller 97 in² (626 cm²), and therefore demands greater technique, precision, and fitness or stamina from the player using it. Generally, this is a racquet better suited for a strong intermediate to advanced player. However, an alternative to the Pro Staff RF97 v13 is the lighter models: - Pro Staff 97 v13 - Pro Staff 97L v13 These two racquets provide intermediate players with a similar feel and hitting experience you get with the RF97, but they're lighter and, therefore, easier to manage on the court. My recommendation would be to review the Wilson Clash 100 and Pro Staff 97L v13 side by side as they offer more similarities. With the Wilson Clash 100, you'll get better comfort, a bit easier power, and greater topspin, but a muted feel and less feedback. With the Pro Staff 97L, you'll get better control, but the smaller head size and tighter stringbed mean you'll have to be more accurate with your swing and work a bit harder for power and topspin, and the feel will be crisp with more feedback. If possible, my recommendation would be to test both racquets. The feel alone is a big differentiator between the two, and a player would fairly quickly gravitate toward one or the other. Of course, I recognize that not everyone has access to demo racquets, so hopefully, some of my thoughts help give you a high-level sense of what to expect and a few extra things to consider. Best of luck!
I'm having a lot of trouble to put length in my shots. I play with a lot of spin, extreme grip, so the balls all land around the service line. I really need some more power behind my shots. Would you recommend this racket to me?
Hi there! Although your racquet can influence power, spin, and overall performance, it's possible to learn how to hit consistently with depth using any virtually racquet and grip. Ultimately, it's a matter of proper technique combined with lots of targeted practice to get it right. The Wilson Clash 100 is an excellent racquet that can work well for a variety of players. However, before buying a new racquet, I'd encourage you to consider lessons and extra practice to reach your goals. From there, your gear can serve as an excellent fine-tuning mechanism for enhancing the skills you develop. I recognize that may not be the answer you're looking for, but I'd hate to see you spend a fair amount of money on a new racquet only to end up with the same challenges.
@@TennisCompanion Thanks for the reply! I have been playing tennis for 10 years now, and my grip somehow just got more extreme with the year. I have tried to change my grip and technique a bit but it's very hard to change old habits. I will keep working on it though but any help I can get from a better racquet is welcome!
Gotcha - I see where you're coming from and agree it can be difficult to change old habits. Another area you might consider experimenting with before swapping racquets is the type of strings you're using and your strings' tension. Some strings are more powerful than others, so you may stand to benefit from a different type of string. Furthermore, lower tensions result in a higher trajectory of the ball, i.e., more depth, which could benefit your game. I was hesitant to suggest more gear changes in my initial reply, but you might find these helpful to consider based on your notes and years playing. If you'd like to learn more about either topic, you might check out my videos on the topics: Types of Strings: ruclips.net/video/OflCsTM6y8w/видео.html Tension: ruclips.net/video/dNabsAmlLOw/видео.html Keep at it, and best of luck!
Hi. Just wondering if you can help me out buying my first racket. I’ve just started taking lessons so I havent had any elbow pain and stuff like that. Currently borrowing a racket my coach lent me. My two choices were Babolat Pure drive or wilson clash 100. Its just Ive read that Babolat are quite harsh on elbows. Thanks in advance.
Happy to help! First off, the racquets that you've sighted are both excellent options. Here's a high-level overview of both: Babolat Pure Drive Specs/Characteristics - Head: 100 in² / 645 cm² (16x19) - Weight: 11.2oz / 318g - Balance: 4 pts HL - Swingweight: 320 - Stiffness: 71 - Beam: 23mm / 26mm / 23mm -- - High power - Excellent topspin - Lower comfort Wilson Clash Specs/Characteristics (EDIT: I accidentally used the Babolat Pure Drive heading twice - changed to Wilson Clash for accuracy) - Head: 100 in² / 645 cm² (16x19) - Weight: 11oz / 312g - Balance: 7 pts HL - Swingweight: 312 - Stiffness: 55 - Beam: 24.5mm / 24.5mm / 24.5mm -- - Mid-range power - Mid-range topspin - High comfort The reason the Babolat Pure Drive can cause players difficulties with their arm/elbow has to do with the fact that it's a stiffer tennis racquet, which translates more shock and vibration to a player's arm. Combined with stiff polyester tennis strings (as players frequently do), this racquet can give players issues. However, the trick is that everyone's bodies respond differently, and it's worth noting technique can play a role. The Wilson Clash, on the other hand, is a highly flexible racquet. Usually, this would mean it's a lower-powered control frame, but Wilson's unique construction for this racquet allowed the racquet to flex for comfort while still maintaining solid power. Both racquets offer user-friendly weights and head sizes. However, beyond the general characteristics I described above, where they differ substantially is how they feel. The Pure Drive has a crisp feel, while the Clash has a softer, dampened feel. Neither is better; it's a preference. If a player is particularly concerned about staying healthy and avoiding arm injuries, I'd recommend the Wilson Clash. However, if the Babolat Pure Drive is appealing, I'd encourage them to avoid using a full string setup with polyester. Instead, I'd suggest the use of a softer multifilament or hybrid with polyester and multifilament. With all that said, there is no substitute for demoing or trying racquets first hand. Many in-person and online retailers offer demo programs, so if you can, I'd highly recommend testing them out with my notes in mind. Of course, I recognize demo programs aren't available everywhere, so hopefully, my notes have helped paint enough of a picture to aid your decision making.
TennisCompanion ive never met anyone on RUclips that would take time to give a very detailed reply to their subscriber. Thank you for this. This helped me a lot in choosing my racket.
Hi Jacob! Yes, I would say the Babolat Pure Aero has a higher propensity to break strings more frequently than many other racquets, but it will depend in part on the types of strings you're using, your grip, and your style of play. I use a semi-western grip and do break strings more frequently with this racquet. However, I have not experienced any issues with cracking, nor would I expect that to be an issue for the vast majority of players.
Hi, awesome review! I have a question. What do you think will produce more spin in Hybrid setup, multifilament in main and co-poly in crosses or multifilament in the crosses and co-poly in the main? If you would go full bed rpm blast or alu power what tension you would use? Thank you in advance.
Thank you, Elanas! Great questions. More often than not, you'll find recommendations for a multi in the mains and poly in the crosses for maximum topspin. It's the same approach Federer and Djokovic take when stringing their racquets, but they're using gut instead of a multi. To achieve maximum topspin, players will usually string the cross strings slightly looser by 2-3 lbs (1-1.4 kg) to allow more freedom for the mains to move/slide. However, with that said, you'll find players with differing opinions on the matter - I'm one of them 😄 I prefer stringing the poly in the mains and a multi in the crosses because I feel like I achieve more topspin that way. I'll string the poly slightly looser and feel like I get more action out of the strings in this manner, but we're talking nuances. Andy Murray takes this approach, but he maintains the same tension for both strings. For that reason, I think it's more important for players to ask themselves how they want their racquet to feel because the string in the mains will dominate the overall feel. I explore this topic in greater detail within my guide, which you might find useful: tenniscompanion.org/hybrid-tennis-strings/ As for RPM Blast vs. Alu Power, I like them both, but I prefer Alu Power for the Wilson Clash, which I find to play with a bit more comfort while also lasting longer. However, if topspin were a priority, then RPM Blast would be the string I'd select. As for tension, while it's a personal preference as many of these topics are, I'd string both poly setups around 52 lbs (23.6 kg) in the Clash. That tension tends to be a sweet spot for me and happens to be right in the middle of the Clash's recommended range of 47-57 lbs. As a result, if you tried this tension, it would provide plenty of room for you to move up or down after trying it based on your preference. I've covered the topic of tension in a past video, which you can check it out here if you'd like to learn more: ruclips.net/video/dNabsAmlLOw/видео.html I hope that helps at least get you pointed in the right direction.
@@TennisCompanion hello, As a present I got clash 100 L my level is intermediate so the racket is a bit too light cause I am 95 kilos 1m83 so to get the best performances what strings you could recommand me to compensate the lightness of my actual racket ? and do you think there is a big difference between clash 100 L and Clash 100 . I like very much the racket but I have no idea if my play will be better with the clash 100. thanks so much
Hi Christian - absolutely! Generally, racquets don't skew toward a specific court surface. Instead, a player's style of play or how they use the racquet does so this racquet can perform well for an advanced player using it on clay. With that said, intermediate to advanced players interested in the Wilson Clash will tend to skew toward the Wilson Clash 100 Tour or the Wilson Clash 98 for their heavier and more stable weight, but the Wilson Clash 100, especially with a bit of customization, can work well too.
Hi Christian. All three racquets can offer advanced players an excellent hitting experience with plenty of topspin. Although a racquet's design does influence topspin to a degree, it's primarily influenced by a player's technique and racquet head speed. With that said, slightly larger head sizes and more open string patterns are a great combination for helping players maximize their spin, especially combined with low powered strings like polyester that allow players to swing hard for topspin. If I had to order the three racquets you mentioned purely on their design characteristics that would help players generate topspin, while also being racquet's that could work for advanced players, I'd go with: - Wilson Clash 100 Tour - Wilson Blade 98 16x19 v7 - Wilson Pro Staff 97 However, if we're talking topspin within the Wilson family of racquets, it's hard not to mention the Wilson Ultra 100 v3 and the Wilson Burn 100. Both options offer more spin-friendly playing characteristics than the above three racquets. Overall, I view the Clash as a well-balanced tennis racquet that doesn't skew too heavily in any performance area other than comfort. Said another way, the Clash will work with any tennis style, but it does have a bit more of an emphasis on a baseline play. As far as topspin goes, it's solid, but not the best, and although it's not the first line of tennis racquets advanced players would typically gravitate toward, it's absolutely an option to consider.
Hi Christian. If topspin is your number one priority and you're looking to stay within the Wilson family of racquets, then I'd encourage you to check out the Wilson Ultra. However, if you're open to evaluating brands outside of Wilson, then I'd encourage you to check out the Babolat Pure Aero and Pure Drive. Within the Head family, the Extreme MP and Speed MP are also worthy options. For max topspin, the Babolat Pure Aero is my top pick. Here's a link to my review of this racquet if you're looking to learn more: ruclips.net/video/EgrE162DS6s/видео.html
Hi, thanks for the question. Some of the more popular racquets I'll have had the opportunity to demo prior, but there will be other frames I get to that I'll likely end up buying without having tried them beforehand.
I am a HUGE flexible racquet fan. If a frame is too stiff or feels board-like then I will not buy it. But, I don't like them so head light. It would be better if the Clash were only 3-4 points HL. And, I don't want to spend $250 on a racquet that does not come in a 4 5/8" grip size. I was considering the 108 head size but it is much too light overall. And, for some reason, evenly balanced racquets just don't work for me. I think it's a racquet head speed issue. So, for me at least, the Clash misses the mark. I am considering the ProKennex Black Ace and Head Gravity instead.
Hi Ted! Thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts on the Clash - it's great to have your perspective. The ProKennex Black Ace and Head Gravity are two solid higher-comfort options with lower RA ratings for players to consider as alternatives. A few additional options players might consider for added comfort include: - Prince Phantom 100P - Wilson Blade 98 v7 - Yonex VCORE 97HD - Dunlop CX 200 Tour Unfortunately, the higher weight (and smaller head sizes) for many comfort-oriented frames puts them out of reach for many players. With that said, I've found the Clash's lower weight combined with its higher comfort to be unique and more approachable for entry to intermediate level players. I think the ProKennex Black Ace fits well in that category, and the Prince Phantom 100P isn't far off either. Thanks again for taking a moment to share!
![Wilson Pro Staff 97 v13 [Deep Dive Review & Playtest]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mHQ2uMp3bL0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
I just discovered your channel a few days ago and am astounded by the quality and production values, not to mention your commentary and skills on court. You put in the work and it shows! Thank you, and keep up the great work. Best wishes from Dubai
Wow! Such a quality high review video - 1st class. I'll definitely be looking out for more of your content.
Awesome - glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for taking the time to share 😄
Great video as always. Love the pictures, lighting setup, audio effect, transition style and all other hard work.
Thank you, Deng! I appreciate the kind words.
Wilson should use this video to promote the Clash. Fantastic job!
For me this clash 100 was a real game changer!! Fantastic racquet 👍💪🎾
Thanks for sharing, Fabio! Always great to hear 😄
I'd echo what i saw from one of comment of your video: you should review all rackets. Ur production quality is very good.
I have a version 1 from the Wilson Custom Order website!! LOVE THE GLOSSY PAINT JOB ON MINE
such good quality content!
Thank you for the support!
I demoed Clash this week. Your inputs helped in making the final decision. Thanks.
Awesome - that's great to hear! Thanks for sharing.
Excellent review! Greetings from Argentina
Thank you, Agustín! Glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for saying hello 😄
Your videos have insanely good production value. Hope your channel takes off!
Thanks for the kind words! I really appreciate it.
I have been searching for a new racket to replace my 28 year old Head racket as I am getting back into tennis again. Been shopping around and heard about the Wilson Clash from different websites , as a great racket for a player of my caliber (3.0). Watched quite a few videos and then I stumbled upon your excellent video. Very unbiased review and great attention to detail when filming. It is now on my Christmas list. Cheers from Canada.
Hi Ken - thank you for taking the time to share, and it's great to hear my video helped in your evaluation of the Clash. I hope it shows up under the tree for you 😄
Love the production quality on your videos!
I’d love to see a review on some of the Yonex line.
Looking forward to your next videos.
Thanks for the feedback and suggestion! I have a few Yonex racquets in my lineup for planned videos. Looking forward to sharing them.
Sounds good, keep up the good content!
Amazing review, subbed.
Thank you! I appreciate the support 🙌🏼
Nice Koniakowsky on the wall! He's awesome - here because of my elbow - liking the tour/pro model so far but can't decide on strings
Thanks! Love his art. Great to hear the Clash is working out for you. If you'd like, happy to provide a few ideas on strings.
@@TennisCompanion Hey there thanks for the response - demoed a bunch of rackets - decided I liked the Clash pro the best - debating on strings - demoed with poly and liked it a lot although I normally only played multis like NRG2 - shop recommended the Luxilon rough
Luxilon ALU Power or Rough are both great starting points for a full poly setup in the Clash. A few notes you might find useful:
- Polyester can be addicting because freshly strung, they do their job well, but they are higher maintenance, so I'd expect to bump your stringing frequency, especially since you're coming to the Clash with some elbow concerns. A dead poly can wreak havoc on a player's arm. Cost of stringing isn't an issue for everyone, but worth considering if you haven't played them for extended periods.
- I've played the Clash with a full poly and hybrid setup, and they both perform well. I like the hybrid because it offers extra comfort while extending the life of the strings overall and plenty of topspin with the poly in the mains. If you enjoyed NRG2, that's a great option to pair with a poly like Luxilon.
- Keeping it within the Luxilon family, these strings are worth checking out: Luxilon 4G, Luxilon Element, Luxilon Smart. That would be my order of preference among the three airing on the side of a slight bit extra comfort, which is relative in the world of polys, with ALU Power at the top of the list.
Good luck with the selection - I hope you find something you enjoy while keeping that arm in good health!
Simple, easy to follow, and very well-produced video.
I used to play tennis regularly as a kid and am picking the sport back up (for the last 3 months now) and am looking to upgrade from my Costco racquet. Given that I generally play topspin from the base and rarely go to the net, this seems like the right fit for me. Do you have a recommendation on String (I am leaning poly) and tension for this racquet? I am fine with re-stringing costs.
fantastic review.. about tecnique...i would improve the no dominant arm on the forehand..compact backhand ( with another grip you will have more spin) , great volley , and fast serve.. congratulations..a 360 degree vision of tennis...
Recommended string tension and brand for this racquet. All around player with good technique and spin
Hi Savas - the recommended string tension for the Wilson Clash 100 is 47 - 57 lbs (21 - 26 kgs), so finding somewhere toward the middle of that range is a great place to start. Then, based on your experience, you can modify up or down to your preference.
For my playtest, I strung a hybrid at 50 lbs in the mains and 52 lbs in the crosses, which worked well. Since then, I've bumped that up a few pounds for added control with this racquet. To learn more about tension, you might consider checking out my video on the topic:
ruclips.net/video/dNabsAmlLOw/видео.html
As for brands of strings to consider, there are plenty of excellent options, but it depends on the type of string or the specific performance characteristics you'd prefer. If your curious, you can check out some of my top picks here:
tenniscompanion.org/best-tennis-strings/
If you'd like to learn a bit more about the different types of strings and why you'd opt for one over another, here are a few additional resources I've created that you might find useful:
Types of Strings: ruclips.net/video/OflCsTM6y8w/видео.html
String Gauge: ruclips.net/video/OolgTCYQH1s/видео.html
Multifilaments: ruclips.net/video/7XN3F0F4ypE/видео.html
Polys: ruclips.net/video/_ot-QQiFDSU/видео.html
I recognize you might have wanted a more specific string recommendation, but it's tricky to do so without more info, so I'm a big fan of helping guide players to make a choice that works for them.
I hope that helps - best of luck!
Targeted video in RUclips. Tennis, tennis reviews, and San Diego. Love it! Now, if you can just make a screenshot with a Volkl or PK (my racquets of choice) next to carne asada fries (or burrito-I’m not picky) at the beach, I’d appreciate it. Thanks.
Just gotta say. This was a great video.
Love your theme tune!
Thanks, Andy!
I like the colors on the clash
It's a good lookin' racquet for sure.
Thank you for your great review. I was wondering what is the ball machine and base you used to simulate serving and returning at around the 5:52 mark? Thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it, Ching - I appreciate the note.
The ball machine is a Spinfire and the base is a two-tier Husky Service cart.
@@TennisCompanion I see so not any special base. Just one that can move the ball machine higher so can angle the ball into the service box. Thank you for you speedy reply and keep up your great reviews. I will subscribe and make sure to like your videos. May I suggest a review of the Yonex Ezone 98 Tour. I just switched to that a few weeks back.
Exactly - nothing too fancy on the base, but it works pretty well. It's something I want to work on enhancing over time because, at its current height, I'm limited on the speed settings while still keeping the ball in the service box. Thank you for the support and racquet suggestion too!
@@TennisCompanion It does not need to be as long as it gets the job done. I think that was smart and being resourceful. I have only seen few tennis ball machines that can serve like the Ace attack and there was this other one I cannot remember that can serve up-to 10' and can do kick serves. But those are more for clubs or someone with a private court. I am going to try to find a base to do this too. Thank you for your idea.
Great review and video. Do you recommend it for a beginner? And what type of strings (in case it’s different from the ones you put on) do you recommend for beginner? I will really appreciate it.
Hi there! Great video production! Thanks for the information
Wich racket you think it´s best, Clash 100 (295 grams) or the Pro Staff RF L (290 grams)? I´m a baseliner player, and I usually play with a lot of topspin.
Other question: do you think that the Clash 100 ir a really revolutionary racket in the industry of Tennis or it´s just a Wilson Company advertisement for the selling of this racket?
Thanks!
Thanks, Carlos! I think both the Clash 100 and the Pro Staff 97L can be the best for different players - it really depends on the individual's wants and needs.
As a baseline player who hits with a lot of topspin, the Clash 100, with its larger 100 in² (645 cm²) head size, which opens up the 16x19 string pattern, will offer more significant topspin potential compared to the Pro Staff 97.
However, what distinguishes these two racquets further is their feel. With its ultra-low stiffness, the Clash has a unique response that's different from most racquets, while the Pro Staff has a more traditional feel. I wouldn't say one is better, just different. I realize it's not always possible, but if you could demo these, I think you'd quickly find a preference.
I can certainly see why Wilson would claim the Clash as a revolutionary racquet because we haven't seen a modern racquet that flexes and responds quite the way the Clash does - it makes for exciting marketing. However, I wouldn't describe the racquet as revolutionary and instead would describe the racquet's construction and materials as innovative.
A really helpful review. Thank you.
Great video, very informative (y)
Thanks, Edward! Glad you enjoyed it.
I have a clash too and currently put Luxilon alu power on it. Did you have the chance to try Luxilon Smart on Clash? Wilson says Smart has that magic effect and could pair with Clash in low tension?
Hi Deng, yes, I have since had the opportunity to hit with the Clash using Luxilon Smart. It's a softer poly that offers players a bit more comfort and a subtle dynamic response depending on the swing speed and style, but I prefer Luxilon ALU Power.
If you are considering softer polys, then it's certainly a reasonable starting point for the Clash. If not, I think most players will prefer the performance of a stiffer poly from Luxilon.
Another great video. It’s so confusing to many, but it would be nice to get a comparison between the new Yonex Ezone 100 2020 model vs the model before it. Believe it is the Ezone 100 2018 which was made in blue and black or lime and black ( two choices ). Calling the Ezone Blue is where the confusion lies, as the 2020 version is actually blue. Real muck up Yonex!
Thanks again, Edward! I appreciate the suggestion as well. The Yonex EZONE 100 is on my list for a review, so at some point, I may be able to get to a more direct comparison between these two generations.
TennisCompanion I would lend you my racquets, but I’m in Australia 🤷♂️
Thank you. Excellent video.
Please one question: Do you think it’s possible use Babolat VS natural gut and which tension you sugest?
Thanks 🙏
Top notch video as usual. Did you get a chance to compare Clash 100 to Clash Tour, and if so - how would you compare their stability, especially on the net?
Thanks, Edmon! I have played with the Clash Tour as well, and it does bump up stability - it's not dramatic, but it helps.
It's a 14 gram or half-ounce difference between the two, but the addition of weight for the Tour skews toward the handle. The Clash 100 is 7pts HL strung, while the Clash Tour 100 comes in at 9pts HL.
I was considering this racquet after demoing a friend’s. What would be the specs for the strings that you would recommend for an intermediate player? Great video!
Thanks, Katherine! String selection and tension involves quite a bit of personal preference, so my recommendations will vary between players. With that said, my choice for the Wilson Clash is either a hybrid or full poly string setup.
I like the hybrid for the Clash because it offers a nice blend between comfort/feel of the multifilament and topspin from the poly while maintaining solid, yet not overbearing, power. Here's what I used for my review, which worked great:
Mains: Luxilon ALU Power at 50 lbs (22.7kg)
Crosses: Wilson NXT at 52 lbs (23.6kg)
However, to maximize topspin and durability, I'd string with a full poly setup, which would offer less comfort and put the onus on me to generate power (and topspin) by swinging faster.
A few videos of mine that you might find useful to help guide your thinking about what makes the most sense for you are:
Types of Tennis Strings [Detailed Explanation + Examples]
ruclips.net/video/OflCsTM6y8w/видео.html
Tennis String Tension: An In-Depth Guide
ruclips.net/video/dNabsAmlLOw/видео.html
Tennis String Gauge Explained: Guide + Chart
ruclips.net/video/OolgTCYQH1s/видео.html
I hope that helps!
TennisCompanion thank you so much for the detailed response. I’m currently playing with babolat pure aero team and i feel like it’s a little too stiff but do like the power from it. I may order a demo of the clash again to give it a real try. Thank you!!!
You're welcome, Katherine!
@@TennisCompanion I've been playing tennis for 3 years now. First, I owned a Babolat Pure Strike, then, looking for more spin and better serves, bought me a Babolat Pure Aero. I thought it was doing a good job. My wife borrom a Wilson Clash 100 and I took it with me to pratice. OMG. Have never given this kind of strokes. I could just let my swing go and my balls were still on court. I'm amazed by it. Great video. Congrats, from Brazil.
@Pedro Xavier - thanks for chiming in with your experience and progression with various racquets! It's great to hear you've been able to experiment, and it sounds like you're learning a lot in the process - that's what it's all about. Cheers to your three years on the court, hopefully, many more to come and happy to hear you liked the video 😄
Love the video
Thank you!
Hey can you please review Wilson Blade?
I am an intermediate player and trying to improve my topspin and volley shots. During winter i experience tennis elbow pain. i currently use a 240gm Head Ti S6 racket currently and want to update to a good overall racket to improve my performance. Help me choose a good racket. I was considering Pure drive 2021/pure aero/wilson clash 100. Waiting for your suggestions. Thanks!
Hi Ali - I replied to your comment over on my Babolat Pure Aero 2019 review, so linking it here for anyone who wants to check it out:
ruclips.net/video/EgrE162DS6s/видео.html&lc=UgwJRDC-47mu6zyS2uZ4AaABAg
Thanks for checking out my videos 😄
is there a different between Wilson Roland Garros Clash 100 and WIlson Clash 100 beside the name?
what I mean is the RG made for clay court only?
Thanks,
Hi Danny - great question! The only difference between the Wilson Clash 100 and the Rolland Garros Wilson Clash 100 is the paint job - otherwise, they're identical tennis racquets.
@@TennisCompanion Thanks so much for getting back. Love your video.
You're welcome! Happy to help.
would enjoy your thoughts on the clash 98
Thanks for the recommendation, John! Excellent frame - I'd love to share more about it with the community.
Hi coming from a pure strike 16x19 (2019), i would like ti change with the clash 98 or 100 cause i need to solve my constant arm problems and the clash giving up some problems seems like a good opportunity with the amazing balance and low stiffness.
I can opt for the 100? Or maybe to light?which one do you recommend between the 3 clash? 98/100/100 tour?
Many thanks
Hi Matteo! Sorry to hear about your arm - injuries and discomfort are never easy, and I know overcoming them can often be tricky.
Transitioning from the 2019 Babolat Pure Strike 16x19, I'd recommend exploring the Wilson Clash 98 or 100 Tour further. Between the two and based on your current racquet, I think the Clash 98 would be a natural transition, but it's going to deliver a bit less power than your Pure Strike.
With that in mind, a hybrid string setup in the Clash 98 could work well for you to recoup a bit of power while maintaining excellent comfort. I'd recommend a quality multifilament in the mains and poly in the crosses.
The Clash 100 Tour is a worthy contender if you want a bit more pop, but I'd expect overall you'd be happy with the 98.
Best of luck with your arm!
I would recommend the Tour otherwise the power is underwhelming
I'm stuck between the Clash 100 and 108, any recommendations out there? I am a beginner that's athletic and learns very quickly. I plan on training a lot using the wall and spending time serving for hours in order to get better. Price is not an issue: I feel like I should get the 108 while I'm still a Beginner, let it carry me up to my mid-level intermediate days, and reevaluate my skill and style and drop big money on another racket. All opinions and constructive criticism are appreciated!
Thanks for the question! The Clash 108 is a reasonable option for beginners that are okay spending the money and looking for a larger head size that will deliver extra margin for error. It's worth noting that it also comes with an extended length, which combined with the larger head size makes for a more powerful spin-friendly racquet.
You could always spend less for a starter racquet, which you may outgrow rather quickly if you're practicing a lot, but if that's not a concern, then the Clash 108 is perfectly sufficient.
Great video
I recently started playing the Clash 98! Going from a Radical Pro. Soon as I borrowed my friends Clash i went out and bought a couple and sold all my others! Went with Smart at 44pds but not a fan if soft strings at lower tension but inthought give it a good try. In a coup weeks i will string with 4G or poly tour Strike are 52-54
Hi Frank! It's great to hear the Clash is working out for you. Thanks for sharing your experience and some of the strings you're testing out.
Thanks for review. Can we use Babolat XCEL for cross instead of NXT? I will use ALU Power 125 for the mains.
great video@
thanks
Thanks, Rodrigo!
Hey, great video. I'm a base line player, I wanted to know which one is a better choice for me between the Wilson clash and the 2019 pure aero.
Thank you, Aaryan! To start, here's a high-level overview of both:
Wilson Clash Specs/Characteristics
- Head: 100 in² / 645 cm² (16x19)
- Weight: 11oz / 312g
- Balance: 7 pts HL
- Swingweight: 312
- Stiffness: 55
- Beam: 24.5mm / 24.5mm / 24.5mm
--
- Mid-range power
- Mid-range topspin
- High comfort
Babolat Pure Aero Specs/Characteristics
- Head: 100 in² / 645 cm² (16x19)
- Weight: 11.2oz / 318g
- Balance: 4 pts HL
- Swingweight: 324
- Stiffness: 67
- Beam: 23mm / 26mm / 23mm
--
- Higher power
- Excellent topspin
- Lower comfort
Both racquets offer user-friendly weights and head light balance for fast swings, making it easier for players to generate racquet head speed - an essential element for producing topspin. Furthermore, they both offer 100 square inch head sizes with open 16x19 string patterns to enhance topspin further. As a result, either can be great options for baseline play, but if topspin and power are a priority, then the Babolat Pure Aero 2019 will deliver above and beyond the Clash.
However, where these racquets differ substantially is how they feel - primarily a function of their stiffness. The Pure Aero has a crisp feel, while the Clash has a softer, dampened feel. Neither is better; it's a preference, but if comfort is a priority, the Wilson Clash is an ideal option.
Most players who have healthy arms and describe themselves as baseliners would be more inclined to lean towards the Babolat Pure Aero 2019, especially when you tack on Rafael Nadal's endorsement.
Ultimately, there is no substitute for demoing or trying racquets first hand. Many in-person and online retailers offer demo programs, so if you can, I'd highly recommend testing them out with my notes in mind. Of course, I recognize demo programs aren't available everywhere, so hopefully, my notes have helped provide some additional context to consider for your decision making since both are well-suited for the task.
Here’s my dilemma. I play with a Wilson Pro Staff RF97 and the regular 97. I’m 53. The RF is just too heavy for me now. I really love how it plays though. The PS97 is good too but it has such a small sweet spot. I have great control with it. I want more forgiveness and a bit more easy power. Something around 300 grams but still has a similar RF solid feel. Would this be a good possibility?
Great question. I have a similar query.
I never recommend anything to anyone as tennis is vey personal but i think that you need to "demo" Head Radical MP 2021 with Luxilon Alu Power at 51 pounds or Volkl Cyclone for crisper feel. The Clash though is the worst racquet i played with. Cool power and comfort but often the ball sails long and have to play consistantly with spin. My personal racquet is Blade v7
My son is currently using a pure strike and I’m entertaining changing it up. I’m researching this racket and others. He likes power, spin, and control. Who doesn’t. But he also likes a bit lighter as he’s just 14. Do you have recommendations?
Could please do the same video considering the Clash PRO? Thank you.
Thank you for the suggestion! I'll absolutely keep it in mind.
Does having a swingweight of only 313 and weight of 295 is good for a player with tennis elbow? O play with a Babolat Pure Drive 300 gr and it doesn't seem to help me.. Every time I play I feel the racket is hard to more and my wrist hurts. I'm looking if a.Clash is better, what do you think?
How do you compare this to the Blade 98 16x19 v8 that just came out? Im on the fence, with the new V8 being softer in RA and having some Clashy Flexy DNA tech inserted into it, the racquets feel so darn similar I can't make a decision!
Awesome video! Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 please next!
Thank you, and I appreciate the suggestion! The Babolat Pure Strike is on my list 😄
Do you have any tips to customize and add some weight to clash 100?
Amazing content and you will soon hit 100k+ subscribers in the next two years. Which one do you recommend btw Clash 100 and Pro Staff RF97 v13 for an intermediate player?
Hi Biakhlei, thanks for the encouragement and support!
Without knowing much about a player, my first inclination would be to suggest the Wilson Clash 100, which is significantly more user friendly in its weight and head size, while being perfectly well-suited for an intermediate player.
The RF97 v13 is an excellent racquet, but it's heavier and has a smaller 97 in² (626 cm²), and therefore demands greater technique, precision, and fitness or stamina from the player using it. Generally, this is a racquet better suited for a strong intermediate to advanced player.
However, an alternative to the Pro Staff RF97 v13 is the lighter models:
- Pro Staff 97 v13
- Pro Staff 97L v13
These two racquets provide intermediate players with a similar feel and hitting experience you get with the RF97, but they're lighter and, therefore, easier to manage on the court.
My recommendation would be to review the Wilson Clash 100 and Pro Staff 97L v13 side by side as they offer more similarities.
With the Wilson Clash 100, you'll get better comfort, a bit easier power, and greater topspin, but a muted feel and less feedback.
With the Pro Staff 97L, you'll get better control, but the smaller head size and tighter stringbed mean you'll have to be more accurate with your swing and work a bit harder for power and topspin, and the feel will be crisp with more feedback.
If possible, my recommendation would be to test both racquets. The feel alone is a big differentiator between the two, and a player would fairly quickly gravitate toward one or the other. Of course, I recognize that not everyone has access to demo racquets, so hopefully, some of my thoughts help give you a high-level sense of what to expect and a few extra things to consider.
Best of luck!
Am I the only one love the red? I low key dig it!
Hi, Eric! I don't think you're alone 😄 I know a lot of players are huge fans of the design. Thanks for dropping a comment.
I need that Pro Staff t-shirt.
It's a good one 👌🏼 I have a few from Wilson and they all fit and perform well too.
Hello I have a Wilson clash 100l but it doesn’t display the specifications for it on the racket is it fake
I'm having a lot of trouble to put length in my shots. I play with a lot of spin, extreme grip, so the balls all land around the service line. I really need some more power behind my shots. Would you recommend this racket to me?
Hi there! Although your racquet can influence power, spin, and overall performance, it's possible to learn how to hit consistently with depth using any virtually racquet and grip. Ultimately, it's a matter of proper technique combined with lots of targeted practice to get it right.
The Wilson Clash 100 is an excellent racquet that can work well for a variety of players. However, before buying a new racquet, I'd encourage you to consider lessons and extra practice to reach your goals. From there, your gear can serve as an excellent fine-tuning mechanism for enhancing the skills you develop.
I recognize that may not be the answer you're looking for, but I'd hate to see you spend a fair amount of money on a new racquet only to end up with the same challenges.
@@TennisCompanion Thanks for the reply! I have been playing tennis for 10 years now, and my grip somehow just got more extreme with the year. I have tried to change my grip and technique a bit but it's very hard to change old habits. I will keep working on it though but any help I can get from a better racquet is welcome!
Gotcha - I see where you're coming from and agree it can be difficult to change old habits. Another area you might consider experimenting with before swapping racquets is the type of strings you're using and your strings' tension.
Some strings are more powerful than others, so you may stand to benefit from a different type of string. Furthermore, lower tensions result in a higher trajectory of the ball, i.e., more depth, which could benefit your game.
I was hesitant to suggest more gear changes in my initial reply, but you might find these helpful to consider based on your notes and years playing. If you'd like to learn more about either topic, you might check out my videos on the topics:
Types of Strings: ruclips.net/video/OflCsTM6y8w/видео.html
Tension: ruclips.net/video/dNabsAmlLOw/видео.html
Keep at it, and best of luck!
hitting a forehand with this racket feels like shooting a missile
would have loved how it sounded section for this
Hi. Just wondering if you can help me out buying my first racket. I’ve just started taking lessons so I havent had any elbow pain and stuff like that. Currently borrowing a racket my coach lent me. My two choices were Babolat Pure drive or wilson clash 100. Its just Ive read that Babolat are quite harsh on elbows. Thanks in advance.
Happy to help! First off, the racquets that you've sighted are both excellent options. Here's a high-level overview of both:
Babolat Pure Drive Specs/Characteristics
- Head: 100 in² / 645 cm² (16x19)
- Weight: 11.2oz / 318g
- Balance: 4 pts HL
- Swingweight: 320
- Stiffness: 71
- Beam: 23mm / 26mm / 23mm
--
- High power
- Excellent topspin
- Lower comfort
Wilson Clash Specs/Characteristics (EDIT: I accidentally used the Babolat Pure Drive heading twice - changed to Wilson Clash for accuracy)
- Head: 100 in² / 645 cm² (16x19)
- Weight: 11oz / 312g
- Balance: 7 pts HL
- Swingweight: 312
- Stiffness: 55
- Beam: 24.5mm / 24.5mm / 24.5mm
--
- Mid-range power
- Mid-range topspin
- High comfort
The reason the Babolat Pure Drive can cause players difficulties with their arm/elbow has to do with the fact that it's a stiffer tennis racquet, which translates more shock and vibration to a player's arm. Combined with stiff polyester tennis strings (as players frequently do), this racquet can give players issues. However, the trick is that everyone's bodies respond differently, and it's worth noting technique can play a role.
The Wilson Clash, on the other hand, is a highly flexible racquet. Usually, this would mean it's a lower-powered control frame, but Wilson's unique construction for this racquet allowed the racquet to flex for comfort while still maintaining solid power.
Both racquets offer user-friendly weights and head sizes. However, beyond the general characteristics I described above, where they differ substantially is how they feel. The Pure Drive has a crisp feel, while the Clash has a softer, dampened feel. Neither is better; it's a preference.
If a player is particularly concerned about staying healthy and avoiding arm injuries, I'd recommend the Wilson Clash. However, if the Babolat Pure Drive is appealing, I'd encourage them to avoid using a full string setup with polyester. Instead, I'd suggest the use of a softer multifilament or hybrid with polyester and multifilament.
With all that said, there is no substitute for demoing or trying racquets first hand. Many in-person and online retailers offer demo programs, so if you can, I'd highly recommend testing them out with my notes in mind. Of course, I recognize demo programs aren't available everywhere, so hopefully, my notes have helped paint enough of a picture to aid your decision making.
TennisCompanion ive never met anyone on RUclips that would take time to give a very detailed reply to their subscriber. Thank you for this. This helped me a lot in choosing my racket.
Hii ,I wanna ask,whether you know if the pure aero is a string breaker or cracks easily?
Hi Jacob! Yes, I would say the Babolat Pure Aero has a higher propensity to break strings more frequently than many other racquets, but it will depend in part on the types of strings you're using, your grip, and your style of play. I use a semi-western grip and do break strings more frequently with this racquet.
However, I have not experienced any issues with cracking, nor would I expect that to be an issue for the vast majority of players.
Clash 100 is awesome I like my clash 98 I use gut strings at 52 pounds is awesome to
Nice 👌🏼 Thanks for sharing! Glad you like the racquet.
Is this raquet red or orange? All videos and pictures I see, it looks like orange.
Hello,
Which do you think is a overall better racquet - clash pro or radical pro?
Compare Wilson clash tour,wilson clash 100 and Wilson clash 98 ...
Thanks for the suggestion!
i would like see review of clash 98
Thank you for the suggestion!
Amazing content and production value ! Thank you ! RF97 Autograph soon perhaps ? cheers
Thank you! Yes, the RF97 Autograph is on my list 😄
@@TennisCompanion which is better clash or rf 97 v13
Top quality vid.
Is it good for one hand backhand
how does clash 100 stack up against pure drive
Where did you get the shirt ?
Hi, there! The shirt I'm wearing came straight from Wilson's website.
Hi, awesome review! I have a question. What do you think will produce more spin in Hybrid setup, multifilament in main and co-poly in crosses or multifilament in the crosses and co-poly in the main? If you would go full bed rpm blast or alu power what tension you would use? Thank you in advance.
Thank you, Elanas! Great questions. More often than not, you'll find recommendations for a multi in the mains and poly in the crosses for maximum topspin. It's the same approach Federer and Djokovic take when stringing their racquets, but they're using gut instead of a multi.
To achieve maximum topspin, players will usually string the cross strings slightly looser by 2-3 lbs (1-1.4 kg) to allow more freedom for the mains to move/slide. However, with that said, you'll find players with differing opinions on the matter - I'm one of them 😄
I prefer stringing the poly in the mains and a multi in the crosses because I feel like I achieve more topspin that way. I'll string the poly slightly looser and feel like I get more action out of the strings in this manner, but we're talking nuances. Andy Murray takes this approach, but he maintains the same tension for both strings.
For that reason, I think it's more important for players to ask themselves how they want their racquet to feel because the string in the mains will dominate the overall feel. I explore this topic in greater detail within my guide, which you might find useful:
tenniscompanion.org/hybrid-tennis-strings/
As for RPM Blast vs. Alu Power, I like them both, but I prefer Alu Power for the Wilson Clash, which I find to play with a bit more comfort while also lasting longer. However, if topspin were a priority, then RPM Blast would be the string I'd select.
As for tension, while it's a personal preference as many of these topics are, I'd string both poly setups around 52 lbs (23.6 kg) in the Clash. That tension tends to be a sweet spot for me and happens to be right in the middle of the Clash's recommended range of 47-57 lbs. As a result, if you tried this tension, it would provide plenty of room for you to move up or down after trying it based on your preference.
I've covered the topic of tension in a past video, which you can check it out here if you'd like to learn more:
ruclips.net/video/dNabsAmlLOw/видео.html
I hope that helps at least get you pointed in the right direction.
@@TennisCompanion Thank You so much, for such long and conclusive answer. I am so impressed and grateful to You. You are awesome. Thanks again.
You're welcome 😄
@@TennisCompanion hello, As a present I got clash 100 L my level is intermediate so the racket is a bit too light cause I am 95 kilos 1m83 so to get the best performances what strings you could recommand me to compensate the lightness of my actual racket ? and do you think there is a big difference between clash 100 L and Clash 100 . I like very much the racket but I have no idea if my play will be better with the clash 100. thanks so much
Can advanced players use this one on clay?
Hi Christian - absolutely! Generally, racquets don't skew toward a specific court surface. Instead, a player's style of play or how they use the racquet does so this racquet can perform well for an advanced player using it on clay.
With that said, intermediate to advanced players interested in the Wilson Clash will tend to skew toward the Wilson Clash 100 Tour or the Wilson Clash 98 for their heavier and more stable weight, but the Wilson Clash 100, especially with a bit of customization, can work well too.
@@TennisCompanion would u recommend pro staff, clash, or blade? For top spin advanced player? For what style is clash recommend.?
Hi Christian. All three racquets can offer advanced players an excellent hitting experience with plenty of topspin. Although a racquet's design does influence topspin to a degree, it's primarily influenced by a player's technique and racquet head speed.
With that said, slightly larger head sizes and more open string patterns are a great combination for helping players maximize their spin, especially combined with low powered strings like polyester that allow players to swing hard for topspin.
If I had to order the three racquets you mentioned purely on their design characteristics that would help players generate topspin, while also being racquet's that could work for advanced players, I'd go with:
- Wilson Clash 100 Tour
- Wilson Blade 98 16x19 v7
- Wilson Pro Staff 97
However, if we're talking topspin within the Wilson family of racquets, it's hard not to mention the Wilson Ultra 100 v3 and the Wilson Burn 100. Both options offer more spin-friendly playing characteristics than the above three racquets.
Overall, I view the Clash as a well-balanced tennis racquet that doesn't skew too heavily in any performance area other than comfort. Said another way, the Clash will work with any tennis style, but it does have a bit more of an emphasis on a baseline play.
As far as topspin goes, it's solid, but not the best, and although it's not the first line of tennis racquets advanced players would typically gravitate toward, it's absolutely an option to consider.
@@TennisCompanion thanks! Sounds to me you are saying more likely some other rackets fits better? Blade/staff or switch to Head or Babolat?
Hi Christian. If topspin is your number one priority and you're looking to stay within the Wilson family of racquets, then I'd encourage you to check out the Wilson Ultra.
However, if you're open to evaluating brands outside of Wilson, then I'd encourage you to check out the Babolat Pure Aero and Pure Drive. Within the Head family, the Extreme MP and Speed MP are also worthy options.
For max topspin, the Babolat Pure Aero is my top pick. Here's a link to my review of this racquet if you're looking to learn more: ruclips.net/video/EgrE162DS6s/видео.html
do you buy them or demo them first
Hi, thanks for the question. Some of the more popular racquets I'll have had the opportunity to demo prior, but there will be other frames I get to that I'll likely end up buying without having tried them beforehand.
I come for the info but stay for the hair!
Haha, thanks for your support 👌🏼
Clash or Burn?
I am a HUGE flexible racquet fan. If a frame is too stiff or feels board-like then I will not buy it. But, I don't like them so head light. It would be better if the Clash were only 3-4 points HL. And, I don't want to spend $250 on a racquet that does not come in a 4 5/8" grip size. I was considering the 108 head size but it is much too light overall. And, for some reason, evenly balanced racquets just don't work for me. I think it's a racquet head speed issue. So, for me at least, the Clash misses the mark. I am considering the ProKennex Black Ace and Head Gravity instead.
Hi Ted! Thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts on the Clash - it's great to have your perspective. The ProKennex Black Ace and Head Gravity are two solid higher-comfort options with lower RA ratings for players to consider as alternatives. A few additional options players might consider for added comfort include:
- Prince Phantom 100P
- Wilson Blade 98 v7
- Yonex VCORE 97HD
- Dunlop CX 200 Tour
Unfortunately, the higher weight (and smaller head sizes) for many comfort-oriented frames puts them out of reach for many players.
With that said, I've found the Clash's lower weight combined with its higher comfort to be unique and more approachable for entry to intermediate level players. I think the ProKennex Black Ace fits well in that category, and the Prince Phantom 100P isn't far off either.
Thanks again for taking a moment to share!
@@TennisCompanion Many thanks!
Make a Clash Pro review. ;-)
Thanks for the suggestion!
It kind of feels like a toy when I swing this.