Star Citizen 3.18 | RTX 4090 + I7 13700K | Ultra Settings | Ultrawide 3440x1440

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @BenchmarkDude
    @BenchmarkDude  Год назад +3

    Forgot to use the command "r_displayinfo 4", will use it in future benchmarks. For more tips, please let me know.
    Edit: E-Cores were disabled to prevent stutters but there were still noticeable stutters.

    • @saint9487
      @saint9487 Год назад

      ddr 4 battleneck , like 30% lost, it needed to tune it 4000+ cl18 to have 5% lost of ddr5 - 6000 cl32 / also r_ShadowsPoolSize 2048 write, in stock is 8000+ for 8K resolution.

  • @A_lg
    @A_lg Год назад +2

    Now that's some impressive graphics right there ! I only have one question : what's the total price of your PC ? Because for SC to run this good, it sure must be an expensive spec

    • @BenchmarkDude
      @BenchmarkDude  Год назад +2

      Hey there! I can't remember the exact total price but I'm sure it was around 3.5K - 3.8K EUR. Thanks for your comment.

    • @A_lg
      @A_lg Год назад +1

      ​Wow that's pricy... Anyway, love your vids. Keep up the good work !

    • @BenchmarkDude
      @BenchmarkDude  Год назад +1

      @@A_lg Yeah it was mostly due to the GPU's price (it was 2000 EURs when it launched). Thanks for your support, I really appreciate it!

  • @ubermk3
    @ubermk3 Год назад +1

    Windows 10 or 11? I'm running a 13600k on windows 10 with e cores disabled and trying to decide if the upgrade to 11 is worth it. I've seen it suggested that the 1% lows are better with 11 resulting in smoother gameplay.

    • @BenchmarkDude
      @BenchmarkDude  Год назад +1

      Hey there, Windows 10 here. I was trying to upgrade to Windows 11 but I was having issues with secure boot and I decided to give up and I'll only update in the future. To be honest, I don't think that it is worth for now since I saw a lot of videos where the performance in Windows 10 was better, including the 1% lows but we never know. Thanks for the comment

    • @ubermk3
      @ubermk3 Год назад +1

      @@BenchmarkDude Appreciate the response this helps. Keep up the great work!

    • @BenchmarkDude
      @BenchmarkDude  Год назад

      @@ubermk3 Glad I was able to help. Thank you so much for the support!

    • @saint9487
      @saint9487 Год назад +1

      @@BenchmarkDude for good 1% lows and 0.1% need 5.5+ cores and higer. In 13900k 5.8 with ddr5 8200 tuned are better then 7900x3d in SC.

    • @BenchmarkDude
      @BenchmarkDude  Год назад

      @@saint9487 Thanks for letting me know!

  • @mackator1
    @mackator1 Год назад +2

    Another bad optimized game.

    • @BenchmarkDude
      @BenchmarkDude  Год назад +1

      It always has been like this unfortunately.

    • @Twentyonebynine
      @Twentyonebynine Год назад +5

      It's not even a "game" yet. It's an alpha without any performance updates. 😉

    • @OneTwoMark
      @OneTwoMark Год назад +2

      @@Twentyonebynine Cope. Ive seen games go through an entire game life being called an "alpha" or "beta". Its a fully functioning game with a decade long development that is being sold for its full price and more. Alpha and beta are used as an excuse. Plus it HAS had many performance updates, its just still shit.

    • @MrSpy13011
      @MrSpy13011 Год назад

      @@OneTwoMark "cope" all he said was the truth lmao