Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Levene's test - SPSS (part1)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 окт 2011
  • I demonstrate how to perform and interpret three different Levene's tests within SPSS. The "regular" Levene's test available through the ANOVA procedure, as well as two versions of Levene's that are robust to non-normal distributions and unequal sample sizes. The first robust Levene's test is known as the Brown-Forsythe test. The second robust test is known as the nonparametric Levene's test, which is based on ranked data.

Комментарии • 29

  • @MrSchmouz
    @MrSchmouz 11 лет назад

    Very well explained! Thanks a lot man!

  • @oTBePka
    @oTBePka 10 лет назад +4

    what do I do when I get significant Levene's on mixed ANOVA :(((

  • @deviation101
    @deviation101 11 лет назад

    I found this really helpful. Thanks.

  • @how2stats
    @how2stats  11 лет назад +1

    Technically, Kruskal Wallis does assume homogeneity of variance (or homogeneity of distributional shapes, which is implied by homogeneity of variance). Kruskal Wallis is good when you have non-normally distributed data, but the distributions across groups have to be distributed non-normally in the same way. If this is not true, then you should consider doing the Median test. I have a video on that too.

  • @Nederlander317
    @Nederlander317 11 лет назад

    Great stuff!!! thanks a million!

  • @manodemetate
    @manodemetate 11 лет назад

    hi, thanks for your vids, so is this first test you perform ideal for normally distributed data?

  • @TheCurls48
    @TheCurls48 11 лет назад

    Simply awesome!

  • @Ben14789
    @Ben14789 12 лет назад

    Very useful, thanks!

  • @TheShipz
    @TheShipz 11 лет назад

    Hi thanks for your video, had a quick question i need help with. what happens if my lavene test is actually significant? I had to perform the kruskal wallis test and my lavene stats have come up significant, does that mean its pointless then reporting my results or do i just continue as normal and make a note that my lavene test is sig. Thank you

  • @christinehamiltonprime
    @christinehamiltonprime 11 лет назад

    Thanks very helpful!

  • @allenhuckabee988
    @allenhuckabee988 11 лет назад

    This is super stuff!

  • @danhoad
    @danhoad 11 лет назад

    Thank you!

  • @escapevi
    @escapevi 11 лет назад

    thank you!!!!

  • @OriginalJoseyWales
    @OriginalJoseyWales 11 лет назад

    Yes you are.

  • @KuldeepSingh-xt7ku
    @KuldeepSingh-xt7ku 4 года назад

    I have not find any option next to descriptive analysis ?

  • @Non-disjunction
    @Non-disjunction 3 года назад

    My p-values are all well below 5%. So that means the variance is statistically different, and therefore I cannot use anova?

  • @lorddarzi5574
    @lorddarzi5574 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you ben affleck

  • @jangelgg
    @jangelgg 9 лет назад

    Estimated. that reference books recommend to identify the types of post hoc for nonparametric analysis. Or if this can recommend others as Nemenyi test for post hoc analysis. Thanks for your attention

  • @mytwocents100
    @mytwocents100 11 лет назад

    Go to 3:09 Homogeneity of variance test.

  • @edelynreonal6595
    @edelynreonal6595 5 лет назад

    anyone here knows how to perform homogeneity of variance for paired t test?

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  5 лет назад

      One option is called the pitman-morgan test: ruclips.net/video/90A0zRqTH4k/видео.html

  • @thoughtclaw
    @thoughtclaw 7 лет назад

    This is the second video I've watched showing how to do a Levene's test on SPSS, and the second one that didn't tell me what the threshold is for statistical significance. It would have been so easy to say that. I'm so frustrated!

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  7 лет назад +1

      Usually, the threshold for statistical significance is .05. That's true for virtually all inferential statistics, including Levene's.

    • @thoughtclaw
      @thoughtclaw 7 лет назад

      Thank you! I'm a novice, obviously.

  • @craftychinurse5240
    @craftychinurse5240 3 года назад

    This one was waaaayyyyy too fast. I loved all the others. Thank you.

  • @mescallw
    @mescallw 12 лет назад

    "too"

  • @MisteryGanz
    @MisteryGanz 4 года назад

    3:03

  • @godwinnnaemeka5438
    @godwinnnaemeka5438 6 лет назад

    Your interpretation of your result is vague, its not clear and therefore not explicit

  • @InBloodChains
    @InBloodChains 12 лет назад

    seriously dude, just do the thing