RUclips should add an algorithm to suggest counter POV videos of current video being watched by its user to get the full picture of any topic, for the benifit for lazy people who hates researching facts. That will be true democratization of RUclips feed itself😅
I don't think so dude, my comments are deleted on multiple occasions while a plenty of comments far horrible and terrible have been let to rot on the comment threads, I've got screenshots to prove it, but alas there is no democracy, we need a stable open Capitalism we need to be Free to Choose
When a religiously persecuted Hindu flees Pakistan to seek shelter in India, after being forced to relinquish his home and property there, asking him to bring full documents and papers to seek citizenship is like rubbing salt on his wounds. It makes him vulnerable to face corruption and further exploitation at the hands of lower level clerks and officials in both countries. Son of Chief Justice educated at Harvard may not have any experience to feel their pain. Please leave these bookish arguments for people like him keen to project his lernedship.
Your claim valid when it comes to experience of pain and anguish, but you fail to question or think that Hindu asylum seekers alone have special privileges shows your true colors. Your empathy should extend to all asylum seekers irrespective of their religion, caster, language. Have you thought about the muslims asylum seekers from Bangladesh, pakistan, myanmar and Tamil asylum seekers from Srilanka. You failing to do so speaks to your thinking that India is a hindu country, no its not.
@@KarunaRajagopal 😂 and that tells your ignorance why the hell nation got partition, watch j sai deepak video on caa and nrc on sangam talks a to z is cleared 👌
@@mjgaming7603 Sai Deepak is a door knob sangi. If you consider him a historian or an intellectual, I don't see any point in arguing with you. It your critical faculties are filled with sangi propaganda. Sai Deepak is the moron who wrote an article claiming caste is a british construct and with the same breath appeared in supreme court aruguing only the parpanars should be allowed inside Sabarimala sanctum. Please read some rea history books and come out of the sangi echo chamber.
Why only persecuted Hindus from pakistan, afganistan and bangladesh and not the persecuted hindus from Sri lanka? Are tamils from Sri lanka not hindus? The CAA is a vote-bank and divisive political bill rather than truly about providing safeguarding the asylum seeking "hindus" from a neighboring country.
Jewish are not included in CAA because in Israel there is a policy according to which any Jewish around the world residing in any part of the country can become the citizen of israel by directly coming to Israel
@@Freespeech5257 Don't talk rubbish, pls read about origin of caa why it 2as introduced...religious persecution is the criteria and it was Introduced to help the struggling minority community which had to suffer due to partition...why are u going to all other religions on earth when the reason for caa introduction was to help hindus and minorities who got stuck at islamic countries
@@Freespeech5257 In a secular country Article 29 and 30 should not be there. You cannot discriminate on the basis of Religion. Also, UCC should be there.
Sai Deepak!! You have to listen to him more to understand his agenda and bias. Listen to him on the free temple movement and reservation, and you will get a clear picture. He is the Sadguru of political analysts."
because we Assamese don't want t o see these vote bank politics anymore. Congress made Bangladeshi muslims as their vote bank and BJP is doing this. You see, the naturalisation process is always there, but when these EXISTING BANGLADESHIS or these religious Minorities, will get the voting right, will also compete for job etc, what will happen to a state like Assam which is burdened with influx since ages. Don't know about rest of the country, but in Assam we want the safeguard of the Clause 6 of historic ASSAM ACCORD, that's it, that's what we want. The Northeastern states except Assam has ILP system, why not in Assam ? Why these legislatures shows reluctancy in implementing such provisions ? We don't care what has Chandrachud's son said, we're concerned about the future of Assamese community, that's it.
question is of accommodation more than legality of CAA.Bcz In Assam indegenous culture is badly diluted in many of the districts, assam has been accommodating more than other states, govt shall come up with just distribution policy, they must not be dumped in few states otherwise encroachment./riots may follow
All India shall share the burden not alone Assam. Your concerns are genuine because of your past experience & dirty politics of Congress and Gan Parishad. Just be brave & push for more & more funds & organised rehabilitation at Centre level for coming prosecuted people. I am from Haryana. During partition our state host all prosecuted Punjabi caste cum community. And a person of this community Manohar Lal Khattar is CM of Haryana. This community is almost 8% population in Haryana. But there is not any kind of hostility or enmity between this community & local people of Haryana Most of Sindhi people are living in Maharastra and are now Integrated part of Maharastra identity They shall be settled in organised way so that no unnecessary political bank emerged Govt of India shall make liberal provision of fund for these person. And these people are not hostile to our culture so they shall easily assimilate
Why they (Al Jazeera) are not calling CAA anti Hindu or anti Buddhists (Bhutan/ Sri Lanka) ? Anything that doesn't promote the interest of Islamism is anti Muslim for them.
@@SubhashishBagchiIf a Muslim is persecuted in his own home, is the solution for him to disown the home? How ridiculous.... Are you even educated? Education and sense of Logic is the weakest link of India...
Everyone who is opposing caa is talking about violation of article 14 but none is talking about violation of The Assam Accord.why?? Only about discrimination of Muslims but nothing for The Assamese.
We should not accept anyone no refugees . There is not enough resources for the indian citizens , why should be accept any refugees. Be it from any community or any religion . Totally in support of nrc but not in support of caa.
Sir if CAA is unconstitutional . Then waqf act , minority commission, 1991 worship act, haaz subsidy is not unconstitutional. If country divide on basis of religion then why not for giving citizenship on basis of religion. Muslim is persecuted on basis of sect or caste in Muslim community. But Muslim, Sikh Hindu is persecuted on basis of religion. If we citizenship to Muslim thy why we given two countries Bangladesh and Pakistan to Muslim. But Jews should be in CAA according to me.
Though the waqf act is totally unconstitutional i agree on that should be removed. Though monority commission is not constituitional , haaz subsidy was unconstitutional and has been removed, and the 1991 places of worship act is also not unconstitutional.
@@sohailansari8027what place of worship act is not unconstitutional , I mean how can't a temple of past which have been demolished and a mosque have been build so I can't take it back what non sense 🤔 It is 100 % unconstitutional
Why hasn't the nepotism (Collegium) in the court system changed? There will be plenty of talented lawyers and judges who can be CJI. Since Ahmediya chose Pakistan, now they should reap the benefits of it, we are not responsible for them.
@@pranjalahluwalia9115Pakistani Hindus did not choose Pakistan but it was imposed on them. Many able to come to Bharat through blood shed and many could not.
@@anushkasharma7334 sure miss you can share the link where I can read and increase my knowledge. we had a communal electorate at that time which meant Muslim voters would vote exclusively for Muslim seats. provinces from current day India -places like Bombay and Madras, which had zero chance of being part of a future Pakistan - gave a 100% mandate to Jinnah. Muslims voted for Muslim league by your logic everyone voting for bjp is voting for hindutva?
The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity. - Said by Baba shaheb Ambhedkar
Sir, what I think is we are forgetting the intention of law passed by the Parliament. It's not at all about granting citizenships. That can be done under Part-2 of the constitution and under Citizenship Act. The present discourse on CAA is about restituting the ill effects on those who were not the cause of the Partition in which Ahmadias do not come in. It's civilizational duty too to correct the mistakes for those to fought for their beliefs system against Islamic Fundamentalism which took 2 pieces of the land.
I am not UPSC aspirant but well educated 45 Yr old. I have lived in US for many years. The real question is How can we help minorities of other countries WHEN our own citizens are under threat. What are we able to do for our own countrymen? Just publishing fake GDP numbers doesn't mean India is progressing - 80cr people are living on 5kg ration from govt. This CAA is purely to bring on poor from other countries and get thier votes. Indian citizens and democracy is hijacked by BJP and they are playing this game just for votes. Every sensible country only importing well educated top line people into thier country. We are exporting all our top talent because people are fed up of the system in India. CAA will make it worse.
This is what happens when people believe that they are well educated because they have lived in USA , they may write Sharma in their name but wrap janyu around their Genitals, and comeup with logics like these 👏👏
We are exporting all our top talent because of freebies and reservation and our oldest party congress say if Congress come in centre then they remove 50% reservation criteria they increase reservation so what we general students do???
Well educated and "fake gdp numbers", selectively criticizing one particular party doesn't make sense. Just having an overview of issues makes your statements baseless
The problem with this CJI’s son’s argument is that he has no clue what this laws root cause was… he is ill informed. Congress under Nehru / Gandhi did not wanted India to split into multiple countries of afghan Pakistan or Bangladesh till the day of partition.. simply because Gandhi was a eccentric man who had more power to decide on what’s good for Pakistanis of partition time because of Congress treating him like god. If Gandhi was ready to work with British around 1943 before end of world war 2, British wanted to work with Nehru and Jinnah to plan, border decisions , knowledge transfer and training of Indian and Pakistan bureaucrats before partition was announced so that the transition will be smooth… since Gandhi s adamant nature did not allow British to plan the drawing of borders as well as training of Indians / Pakistanis over the course of 1943 to 1947, British had to forcefully send Mountbatten to decide border and hastily announce independence which lead to blood bath. Gandhi unknowingly was reason for millions of Hindus Muslims Sikhs being massacred… since in this hasty sudden migration, many( Hindus Christian’s Sikhs jains) in villages and remote places who were unaware of how evil a Muslim majority country will become and stayed back. Today their population is almost wiped out and they have come to India and been living as undocumented for decades in India because India does not give them citizenship… In Pakistan once cannot declare themselves as atheist after being a Muslim. If India gives citizenship to atheists in Pakistan , ISI can send spies in the name of atheists.. also the moment these people announce they are atheist in Pakistan, they will be either 40% lynched by fellow citizens or jailed by Pakistan law. Forget about they getting a chance to come to India… this is a stupid argument from a kid who has lot to learn about India history..: Plus why not Jews and others ? These people never were having any rivalry during partition and were also free to move where they wanted… most likely there will be 6 to 8 Jews who has zero cognitive skills comparable to yours who think they will be able to live in Pakistan where Islamists are waiting ti slay them because of hate that comes from times of 6 th century of Islamic rise.
1. Gandhi "was reason for millions" ? Are you a secret admirer of Jinnah? 2. "India does not give them citizenship" : Why is the India gvt not providing citizenship using the existing laws? Will CAA magically grant citizenship the moment pakistani hindus step their foot on Indian soil? 3. "ISI can send spies in the name of atheists" : What makes you think that ISI will not send spies in the disguise of hindus? 4. Did you forget about the hindus persecuted in Sri Lanka? Are hindus from pakistan more important than hindus from sri lanka?
Thank you Naman sir , since 2 days i have been reading various articles and editorial about this topic but the clarity and an unbiased perspective about CAA which i got from this video is unmatched. Thank you once again for this video !! Jai Hind!!
Sir your opinion is correct but the legality of any matter is a different aspect. The amended act doesn't mention Religious prosecution any place. So the ground itself becomes challengeable . Also if they mention about religious prosecution proving the fact that they are doing religious prosecution is close to impossible. India will not even think of losing its only friendly neighbor Bangladesh by dragging them and accusing them of religious prosecution. Also your reasoning that Ahmadiyya betrayed us in the past and called for division is a vague one. It is right for gaining popular support but not valid in the court of law.
It doesn't mention religious persecution bcoz it doesn't matter. Whoever wants to come will just say he or she is religiously persecuted so will u go to Pakistan to check whether he was really persecuted? That's why any Hindu can come bcoz everyone knows what happens to minorities in those countries. That can be proved in court as well so ground is not challengable at all bciz it doesn't go against constitution.
You are showing the world how to do in-depth research and analysis, firstly when i saw chandrachur video i thought wow he is so right about CAA but when you gave your response a new dimension opens up, thanks for sharing your thoughts 💭 Naman sir😊😊
Nailed it. What an articulation. What a great profound knowledge. What a n holistic approach to an issue. Just cannot get better than this. Huge respect for you sir.❤
Hey Naman, completely agree with your views on this. I have just one question with respect to the exclusion of Sri-Lankan Tamils to apply for Indian citizenship via this expedited route. Don't you think they make a strong case for expedited citizenship if we are considering atrocities committed on religious minorities in our neighbouring countries?
Nice viewpoint, your facts changed my thoughts as i was unaware about much of them, i was just thinking about article 14. Now my stance has changed to pro CAA
Only three years after our Constitution was adopted, its chief architect, BR Ambedkar, publicly disowned it in Parliament. In an astonishing admission in 1953, he blurted out in the Rajya Sabha....several acts had British & American relevance..updation is a must to suit the prevailing era , we support CAA .
Hindu m rkha kya h .bharat m jo girls h agar gareeb h to konsi safety h unki? Unka b sbbb forceful hi hota h sir. INSANIYAT rakhiye HEVan na bano .jo hain yahan unko safe rkh ni paye .aaj b koi aurat shaam ko safely akele nahi ja sakti .STOP THIS HYPOCRISY ON NAME OF WOMEN. you men dont deserve women
@@starrysky1128 milord who the hell are you to give certificate of civilization here, how can you prove that women in india is not safe because of the person commented, and by seeing your action and half knowledge I think you are the person molesting women in real life and being champion of civilization of internet
@@starrysky1128 The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity. - Said by Ambhedkar
Any jew living anywhere in the world is a citizen of Israel under Israel's laws, so why would any jew live as a refugee in india for 6 years when he can go to Israel. That's the reason they've not been mentioned
@pradeepKarInd not that level persecution compared to others. Atleast there is no violence going on if govt topples even though hindu tamil have no right in constitution
Why people don't understand that anyone can get citizenship through registration but govt made special efforts to grant citizenship to religious perscuted people in pak afg and ban.
Because instead of clearing citizenship doubts your modiji do maan ki baat which is bare propaganda and all other bjp mps only do blame game rather than answering simple questions when asked. And the rest confusion is created by congress party the seculars whose sole purpose is to spread fake info about all acts.
@@SarojSingh-nq5ql are nahi bhai har notifications ko ake khud pm ko samjha nahi chahiye baki Sare log to pagal hai na jo cabinet me hai sb modi ki krle 😂😂
Census ho ni raha aur addition dekiye. Dimag se socho.kholo use. Persecuted ko hi deal krna h 2 desh ki innumerable women jo prostitution m phasi h unhe rescue krte. Kothe bnd krvate. Mps jo unko back krye h unko presecute krte.
Dear Naman, Though I agree with you on a major ity of the points, I am skeptical regarding the coverage of the CAA amendment 2019. It fails to include the persecuted tamil speaking hindus in Sri Lanka for reasons unknown to me. In that context I believe it does violate the article 14. Can you please explain your views on the same?
Tamil speaking Hindus in Sri Lanka are persecuted not based on religion. There is a voilent history behind that. It's a separate issue. They are not religious minority.
Excellent, Excellent, Excellent. Proud to have an Indian citizen like him. It's not a mere prepared speech but it's serious and from the heart. Such people are needed to rule out Nation who can be challenging and knowledge. Rahul Gandhi should learn and give way for such people for a brighter India. Rahul Gandhi if he is serious abt India's future he should come out of Congress bond and incorporate all the mighty people with knowledge and skills to bring down the hogus bogus rule in India, even to the extent of sacrificing Prime Minister dream. The ruling party is comfortable with Congress as long as they are INCOMPETANT. He has to seriously think abt it and unite all the competitive people who are really for the welfare of the country from all over India and form a stronger party.
if everyone can become citizens then why they need CAA? enter the border wait 10-11 years and volla. if they suffered persecution mentally and physically how CAA helps them better than traditional route? by creating CAA aren't we creating unnecessarily drama ? why do they want voting rights just by living 5 years? is 5 years enough for them to take decision for the country? What benefits do they get through CAA? why even wait 4-5 years? why not immediately if citizenship is that necessary for them?
Sir can you please make video on this Norcet (conducted by AIIMS) nursing officer vacancy (Pay scale 90k+ per month) In this exam from last 3 years se 80:20 rule h sir reservation ka on the basis of sex(gender) For female there are 80% seats reserved only 20% seats are for male and in that 20% we have cast wise reservation also Last year total 5000 seat were there only 379 seats for male only 120 general seats 💺 for male sir how we can survive sir this level of competition. I scored 66% Mark's in mains but still not got selected... But students with have less then 45% got seat in AIIMS Which have lesser knowledge then me less capable then me is going in AIIMS he will assign patients... This establishment why this is still legal and why AIIMS don't have this policy for doctors. Why only nursing officer post why no other post have this type of reservation. Is this legal? Why this discrimination is allowed, AIIMS is already facing issues of not getting skilled personal AIIMS director admitting it because of 80,20 rule Yhe tho hona hi tha i don't know why they want to continue this illegal policy ruclips.net/video/P4xPSYTZozE/видео.htmlsi=uI57IylIi-dL-Ktp Where is equality 1st in this matter I am Indian citizen where is equality, AIIMS is center funded by central government..... Why male facing discrimination just because I born male why I have face this problem 80.20 remove please
I agree with you I am Indian why I am still facing discrimination just because I born male 🐏 Why nobody taking about this do you want you go to AIIMS and you admitted in hospital nurse is carrying you is not capable or knowledgeable,she just selected just because she is gril shy this discrimination
No body will talk about this real issue pr koi baat nhi krtha tho common hard working ko affect krthi h sab bs views chaiye so I think if influential log baat krnege tho kch hoga is rule ka
CAA is notified just to get political mileage as of now. Cutoff Date is 2014, around 9.5 yrs has passed already, not much of the use, If they don't modify the cutoff dates. The main Issue is It will act as a bedrock for future bad policies like NRC, if current government feel threatened about their Central seats, not in 2024, but maybe in 2034, to take advantage of communalism .
Just A Thought... Mamy times people put common sense aside and follow the constitution. But we have to understand that Constitution is made by people and for the people of India not people of India born for constitution. We should first think for Humans then think about constitutional boundaries.
I aporeciate your knowledge against sudo lefitst educationalist. U r not bius. U are loved for your honesty. I admire being Indian . I support ur courage to speak against so called stalvert who became by their position deminishing the indian culture. I respect u .
With due respect I request u to study Assamese version of opposition of so called CAA. Cutoff date from 1951 to 1971 to 2014 now. Why would Assamese people take the burden of religiously persecuted people from erstwhile East Pakistan alone. If govt giving them citizenship through CAA, every state should take some of them.
abhinav more than challenging the ethical value of CAA,argued how it violates the right to equlity,i agree with abhinav.Naman is supporting his arguments based on moral or historical ground not on constitutional ground
Why isn’t he talking about whats happening with the people in assam because of NRC and CAA… why isn’t he talking about detention camps… people in Assam are in detention camps for 3 years and then it’s proven that oh sorry you are a citizen of India…. Look at both sides of the coin
This is a very good view.And,we have done this in last 1000 years ,it's a part of our culture .We are secular not because of the constitution,but an inherit trait of our culture.This concept of accepting people from every creed in present times is not in the country's interest.As there are some groups who do not revere this concept and will only destroy the culture of our country .In my opinion CAA is in India's interest.
The whole process of appointment of CJI is stupid. CJI's son will be the new CJI, that is completely stupid and unethical. There should be a fair process and competition to all the posts in Bharat. And people should not question CAA is ethical or unethical. It's for minorities, in our three neighboring countries, and we Hindus are also transitioning from Majority to Minority. We should have Bharat as our and ours Land only FULL STOP.
Thank you for this nuanced understanding of CAA without any political or religious biases. I hope more people watch this video and learn to analyze such policies without their political or religious biases.
Sir can you please make video on this Norcet (conducted by AIIMS) nursing officer vacancy (Pay scale 90k+ per month) In this exam from last 3 years se 80:20 rule h sir reservation ka on the basis of sex(gender) For female there are 80% seats reserved only 20% seats are for male and in that 20% we have cast wise reservation also Last year total 5000 seat were there only 379 seats for male only 120 general seats 💺 for male sir how we can survive sir this level of competition. I scored 66% Mark's in mains but still not got selected... But students with have less then 45% got seat in AIIMS Which have lesser knowledge then me less capable then me is going in AIIMS he will assign patients... This establishment why this is still legal and why AIIMS don't have this policy for doctors. Why only nursing officer post why no other post have this type of reservation. Is this legal? Why this discrimination is allowed, AIIMS is already facing issues of not getting skilled personal AIIMS director admitting it because of 80,20 rule Yhe tho hona hi tha i don't know why they want to continue this illegal policy ruclips.net/video/P4xPSYTZozE/видео.htmlsi=uI57IylIi-dL-Ktp Where is equality 1st in this matter I am Indian citizen where is equality, AIIMS is center funded by central government..... Why male facing discrimination just because I born male why I have face this problem 80.20 remove please
Thank you so much sir. whenever i have any doubt or m confused to form opinion you are my go to person. The way you explained things in simplest way with facts is astounding.
Dear , Not everyone's opinion is totally right....all have different opinions with some good and some bad sides.... But in this video many point are absolutely right...but some are very wrong...like BCCI chairman..... I agree that Hindu tourched in Pak and Bangladesh ....but what about Muslim and Sikh in there own country... Muslim are also tourched by Hindus to chant Jai shree ram....and They called Muslims of India are also terrorist and Sikhs are khalistani.....what that fuck this is...... So think with open mind and then react on that particular situation or statement...
Aman sir I'm not your follower I'm your fan , but here I'm not agree with you...... because (1). If any one get Indian citizenship through traditional method than why CAA , you don't think it is only for political gain (2) citizenship through citizenship act 1955 , is this law only for Muslim, (3). Sir what about article 14, (4) Why we share our resources with other, first we need to empower our citizens , we all know our unemployment rate in our country 5). If it is not political gain stand, if this law was really good, than why mr shah was waiting for 2024 election. I have many other concern if you permit than I will share my concern... .
1) Already hindus, sikhs, and other minorities live a life like hell in those countries, and then they come here again to live in hell? As there is no proper facility for them, check out how they live in indian without citizenship. 2)Muslims can become the citizens, that s the final point. 3) It is not about population, it is about ending the horrific persecution and bringing them here, atleast they will live here and not be killed in pakistan. 4) Mr shah implemented it after the 2024 election, not before because then the stupid opposition will use it as an excuse of interfering with elections.
In India we favour a lot of religious stuffs that should be re-thinked. You have articulated this matter well and within the boundaries and I love this fact as there is no end to this. I could only wish if you bring more of such matters in this channel as to bring down the disinformation. I am a fellow aspirant in this domain and more like me and not me are there to get jolt down the facts and boundaries of such laws or concern. Best wishes for India as she is moving ahead despite many challenges.
Brilliant analysis and very objective argument in favour of CAA. It is important to understand the history, impact and complete context of a situation before judging it superficially. Abhinav's arguments apprared to be immature, uninformed and lacked depth of understanding of history and geopolitics. I can bet that Abhinav C. will never be the CJI unless he shows maturity and a deeper understanding of Indian and global history, geopolitics and a need for immediate corrective action to save lives.
Such immaturity BY CJI's son how can only reference of single Article Is correct ....you have to consider the Constitution as a whole and not just refer 3 lines as per your need. As Article 14 treats everybody as equal, it not about percentage wise Equal,you can still classified by categories and provide the special Treatment/law/acts. Even there are so many special treatment already in Practice which affects Much larger population than the CAA act.
Sir we need a detailed discussion on the collegium system of Indian Judiciary.... Your words making me knowledgeable at every aspect ❤ ସାର୍ ଆମକୁ ଭାରତୀୟ ନ୍ୟାୟପାଳିକାର କଲେଜିୟମ୍ ସିଷ୍ଟମ୍ ଉପରେ ଏକ ବିସ୍ତୃତ ଆଲୋଚନା ଆବଶ୍ୟକ ... ତୁମର ଶବ୍ଦ ମୋତେ ପ୍ରତ୍ୟେକ ଦିଗରେ ଜ୍ଞାନବାନ କରେ |❤
This is a great unbiased analysis. Couple of other points to be addressed - ( these are not tied to constitutional vs unconstitutional argument) 1). How do you differentiate between religous persecution and just economic problems as someone's real reason to migrate? 2). How do we avoid misuse of this Act by whichever parties are in power.
I don't know why nobody is speaking about one of the most crucial point about partition. Any non-muslim from our neighbouring countries should be natural citizens of Bharat. It's because once Bharat was partitioned based on muslims and non-muslims, the asset sharing also happened based on the population of the two. Assets were shared proportional to the muslim and non-muslim population, speculating a complete migration between the two. That is why there were even talks of population exchange when such complete migration didn't happen. What it essentially means is that Bharat holds the share of assets on non-muslims while it has given away the share of assets of muslims. Hence, any non-muslim in our neighbours are natural citizens of Bharat, while muslims aren't.
Well counter point I'm amazed by your reasoning. Sir i want to know why i get impressed by other people points easily is it due lack of facts and knowledge of my own or any other reason?
Okay, but don't make assumptions that just because someone's father and grandfather is/was CJI, so he will be CJI for sure. Abhinav has just put forth his arguments and you've all the right to go against his arguments. But, no need to target him or his family personally. And, even if he becomes CJI someday, it doesn't mean that he's incapable or untalented to hold that position.
@PMcse Yes, I thik that he exemplifies the singular capability of ascending to the position of CJI, much akin to how Mr. Jay embodies unparalleled proficiency in leading BCCI, Mr. Akhilesh demonstrates exceptional competence in steering SP, and Mr. Rahul symbolizes the epitome of potential in assuming the role of PM. What an incredulous assertion, my friend. Take heed of Sir's words attentively and then reevaluate your own comment. Whether you acknowledge it or not, it's an undeniable reality that a dynastic propensity pervades every sphere.Sir is neither endorsing nor condemning it; he is merely articulating it as a verifiable truth. Moreover, if we were in their shoes, the likelihood is high that the same trajectory would ensue for us as well. In essence, if we were to occupy positions such as CJI or ministers, the hereditary continuum would likely extend to our progeny.
He will bash and educated person like abhinav, son of CJI. But he can never bash an illiterate chaiwalla. So nothing is unbiased as they potray it!! Godi influencer!!
Interesting part is son of CJI and his education only came into question after CJI decision on electoral bonds. So it is not a rocket science for logical person to understand who is paying for this narrative and who is being targeted for public display.
Bhaisaab, apne judicial collegate system is full of examples of nepotism and groupism. There good chances he will quickly climb the judicial ladder because of this
Then the govt kept silent about it.. time to time raised it in non-bjp state elections And then dropped it again just at dawn of announcement of LS elections It's as clear as water@@Ash-lb3gb
@@cia1894 mannohan singh , on the satge of the parliament said we have an urgent need and a moral obligation to implement caa in 2012 was that a political stunt too?, if we go by that logic govt should do nothing in elections years just yesterday they inaugurated sela turnal they shouldn’t had , its an political stunt too
Sir, what about those Muslims who will temporarily convert themself to Hindus to get Indian Citizenship and will follow their Muslim belief after getting Citizenship?
Arrey bhai tou convert hoga tou sarkar nahi dekhenge ki kab convert hua hai. Matlab sarkar ko chutiya samjhe ho kya. They do thorough inspection before acting. This is not congress , ki mumbai blast hote rahe aur yahan hindu terror par book launch karne mei Home minister busy ho.
I appreciate you saying very directly that we are overly complicating practical realities with theory just to frame arguments…. That’s what we do, we create arguments , we frame narratives not to address what needs to be achieved but what we as biased human being want to achieve… we bend facts and data to achieve want we want rather than what is needed… and we think of ourselves as intelligent human being… the fact in this whole debate is no one is denied citizenship in India but CAA has another purpose altogether which tries to address a particular problem… it has lacunas but tries to solve which is appreciable…
Good insight... But to best of my understanding - at least in India - the protest against CAA started mainly with Amit Shah and BJP started stating that CAA along with NRC and NPR will be used to get rid of illegal Muslims immigrants in India.. HE linked both these - CAA and NRC ..
Opposition is raising issues of common poor peoples of india regarding their businesses which is struggling in current government rule and saying to empower the small businesses and raising issues about youth unemployment which is almost double till 2023 October in a country where 55% of population is youth and well as high inflation also which this current b.j.p government has promised to decrease before 2014 election with reference slogan like ' bahut hui mehngai ki maar abki baar modi sarkar ' . And these all issues are of most of the people of india I think of around 70% people of india. And these are all the main issue regarding common peoples life of this country. And still if they not credible compare to this lying b.j.p government. Who is just deceived the country with their fake promises on job to youth , inflation , doubled up the income of farmers and m.s.p . And with that insulting the constitution and democracy by controlling all the government institutions unethical way to win the election like Chandigarh election , by using e.d , c.b.i for suppressed the voices who against their policies. They are destroying main principals of constitution like ethics and morals . I think as a common people as for the countrys most people's perspectives opposition is raising right issue of this country . And for me my country is each and every individual of this country
People reacted because it was said that NRC with CAA can be used in a questionable manner. Bcz in NRC citizenship will be tested based on documents and a failure to do so worried people. Birth certificate is a valid document and it is widely said that we need to provide not only ourself but also our forefathers birth certificates but birth certificate was not made mandatory until 1970. Documentation system and its preservation of our society is bit questionable before digitalization. In short can you answer that if NRC and CAA together pose an significant issue. Really appreciate your work and effort.
My question is then what's the point of CAA? If Citizenship act already provides for the naturalization process of 11 years for anyone who wants the citizenship. Why bring the CAA to fast track the Citizenship process, it's not like government is going to do anything to make the life of refugees in any better.. I doubt the intention behind it. Please help me understand..
it is actually a good point you rose but let me tell you instead ...Naman give example of Adnan Sami he was stateless for 1 year before being citizen of India there is news article where he mention its draw backs. Refugee has numerous restriction until and unless he is some rich dude and trust me we guys are still arguing on legal way for citizen ship thee are other ill legal way from which Bangladeshi and Rohingyas are getting in . Politicians give them all these same citizenships resources the matter of months they come to India for being vote bank. I beileve Illegal part need to be explored more....we might have a secret Invasion built up under our nose.
BJP want votes of the refugee as well as of the majority by selling the propaganda that minorities in Pakistan Bangladesh and Afghanistan are treated inhumanly but their own party agenda is to treat minority is very well known to the masses
Actually, why do we need CAA?? It only means letting in more people and anyways we are already a very densely populated country. Not to mention the strain kn resources with so much poverty still not maneged. Both the leading parties have only been interested in votebanks, not in trying to solve the issues already at hand and create division in ppl community whether by action or reaction. Really sad to see how bad politicians can ruin a great country
6:32 Sir my openion this bill is for the religious presecution those who are in minority in the 3 country. And also founding leader promised to the minority people that it is our responsiblity when they want to live in india we accept open heartly. Afterall we promise to the people. Many people left 20. 30 bigha of land because they not feel to safe.
Muslim is not a minority in pakistan/Bangladesh/Afghanistan.....if u will tell me that ahamadiyas are persecuted minority in pakistan then it's not my fucking problem to welcome him into india, he went to pakistan in his own accord., that's a infighting between muslims, for me he is not a minority, he is just a muslim, we won't allow muslims from pak/Bangladesh to live in india , cope with it
Sir my question is that if CAA is granted will the state people will accept those refugees in their state...sir in my state we indigenous people are becoming minority and refugees are becoming majority and they enjoy all your rights it this continues we indigenous people will be no longer will be inexistence. I'm not against CAA but I don't want those refugees to be residing in my State
CAA as of now is only applicable for people who applied for it before 2014 that is roughly 1000 chaps so, iam pretty sure 1000 chaps coming in india wont make anyone minority
@@uh8891 not everyone who is oppressed can come through fastrack(CAA) govt has set a cap of 2014 so only (1k) people registered if govt extends the cap date from 2014 to 2020 the number can grow 100 folds
@@Ash-lb3gb Do you know according to data between 2015 to 2020 , 13 lakh people accepted Islam ? Govt has also put a cap over there and brought a bill anti conversion bill tell them to remove it . We can see many more non Muslim accepting Islam.
In modern day ex:- giving khalistani and making amendment (caa) khalistani eligible to get citizenship in india what make sense in that if india dont take that step minority's get eradicate in those country's, (IF INDIA DONT DO THAT NO ONE CAN DO), this make burden on 🇮🇳 india (scarce resources) our people will suffer irrespective of religion, caste for food, shelter and mainly for water POV:- if india do not strict on this regard no future for india (may be india not exist in future) china Pakistan will occupy india, india Already fragmented because of partition pak🇵🇰, Epak🇧🇩, 🇦🇫 etc study history, india must be strict on this case
I am a Muslim and i support citizenship amendment bill❤❤ Muslims and christians have many options but hindus have only 2 options.. Hindus being the majority of the country should enjoy this privilege.
"Only in the RUclips comment section there is a democracy " - well said 😂
RUclips should add an algorithm to suggest counter POV videos of current video being watched by its user to get the full picture of any topic, for the benifit for lazy people who hates researching facts. That will be true democratization of RUclips feed itself😅
I don't think so dude, my comments are deleted on multiple occasions while a plenty of comments far horrible and terrible have been let to rot on the comment threads, I've got screenshots to prove it, but alas there is no democracy, we need a stable open Capitalism we need to be Free to Choose
When a religiously persecuted Hindu flees Pakistan to seek shelter in India, after being forced to relinquish his home and property there, asking him to bring full documents and papers to seek citizenship is like rubbing salt on his wounds. It makes him vulnerable to face corruption and further exploitation at the hands of lower level clerks and officials in both countries.
Son of Chief Justice educated at Harvard may not have any experience to feel their pain. Please leave these bookish arguments for people like him keen to project his lernedship.
perfect point of view , abhinav is just looking the practical ground reality while reading some idealistic bookish shit and nothing else
Your claim valid when it comes to experience of pain and anguish, but you fail to question or think that Hindu asylum seekers alone have special privileges shows your true colors. Your empathy should extend to all asylum seekers irrespective of their religion, caster, language. Have you thought about the muslims asylum seekers from Bangladesh, pakistan, myanmar and Tamil asylum seekers from Srilanka. You failing to do so speaks to your thinking that India is a hindu country, no its not.
@@KarunaRajagopal 😂 and that tells your ignorance why the hell nation got partition, watch j sai deepak video on caa and nrc on sangam talks a to z is cleared 👌
@@mjgaming7603 Sai Deepak is a door knob sangi. If you consider him a historian or an intellectual, I don't see any point in arguing with you. It your critical faculties are filled with sangi propaganda. Sai Deepak is the moron who wrote an article claiming caste is a british construct and with the same breath appeared in supreme court aruguing only the parpanars should be allowed inside Sabarimala sanctum. Please read some rea history books and come out of the sangi echo chamber.
Why only persecuted Hindus from pakistan, afganistan and bangladesh and not the persecuted hindus from Sri lanka? Are tamils from Sri lanka not hindus? The CAA is a vote-bank and divisive political bill rather than truly about providing safeguarding the asylum seeking "hindus" from a neighboring country.
Jewish are not included in CAA because in Israel there is a policy according to which any Jewish around the world residing in any part of the country can become the citizen of israel by directly coming to Israel
In Our neighbouring countries there are less than 1 dozen Jews collectively.
And some who living in Bangladesh have citizenship of Israel.
So what
Jews dont gave to struggle for citizenship in any country because Israel will be there for them
@@Freespeech5257
Don't talk rubbish, pls read about origin of caa why it 2as introduced...religious persecution is the criteria and it was Introduced to help the struggling minority community which had to suffer due to partition...why are u going to all other religions on earth when the reason for caa introduction was to help hindus and minorities who got stuck at islamic countries
@@Freespeech5257 In a secular country Article 29 and 30 should not be there. You cannot discriminate on the basis of Religion. Also, UCC should be there.
This is how an educated self-made person speaks. Hats off to you, Naman Sir! You and Sai Deepak are some of my favorite people
Sai Deepak is not a neutral guy.....he's right wing spokesman
Tho apko kya dikkat hai bhai sahab aur ek hai anand ranganath and poonewala ❤
Sai Deepak!! You have to listen to him more to understand his agenda and bias. Listen to him on the free temple movement and reservation, and you will get a clear picture. He is the Sadguru of political analysts."
@@Leo-hd5dzwhats wrong on free temple movement?
Sai Deepak really? He is jus a religious idiot who speaks shit and only has myopic view
because we Assamese don't want t o see these vote bank politics anymore. Congress made Bangladeshi muslims as their vote bank and BJP is doing this. You see, the naturalisation process is always there, but when these EXISTING BANGLADESHIS or these religious Minorities, will get the voting right, will also compete for job etc, what will happen to a state like Assam which is burdened with influx since ages. Don't know about rest of the country, but in Assam we want the safeguard of the Clause 6 of historic ASSAM ACCORD, that's it, that's what we want. The Northeastern states except Assam has ILP system, why not in Assam ? Why these legislatures shows reluctancy in implementing such provisions ? We don't care what has Chandrachud's son said, we're concerned about the future of Assamese community, that's it.
question is of accommodation more than legality of CAA.Bcz In Assam indegenous culture is badly diluted in many of the districts, assam has been accommodating more than other states, govt shall come up with just distribution policy, they must not be dumped in few states otherwise encroachment./riots may follow
@@ankurjyotisarma7202 true
I am a bengali, If u cannot accommodate bengali Hindus...plz send them to west bengal and we will accommodate them Via CAA...end of debate
All India shall share the burden not alone Assam.
Your concerns are genuine because of your past experience & dirty politics of Congress and Gan Parishad.
Just be brave & push for more & more funds & organised rehabilitation at Centre level for coming prosecuted people.
I am from Haryana. During partition our state host all prosecuted Punjabi caste cum community. And a person of this community Manohar Lal Khattar is CM of Haryana.
This community is almost 8% population in Haryana.
But there is not any kind of hostility or enmity between this community & local people of Haryana
Most of Sindhi people are living in Maharastra and are now Integrated part of Maharastra identity
They shall be settled in organised way so that no unnecessary political bank emerged
Govt of India shall make liberal provision of fund for these person.
And these people are not hostile to our culture so they shall easily assimilate
We don't have ILP system in Tripura too.
Why they (Al Jazeera) are not calling CAA anti Hindu or anti Buddhists (Bhutan/ Sri Lanka) ?
Anything that doesn't promote the interest of Islamism is anti Muslim for them.
but according to Al Jazeera Muslim are being prosecuted in India so why they want other Muslim to go India to be prosecuted
@@googletranslatesongs6042persecuted.
just click on three dots and select dont recommend channel for al jazeera videos
@@googletranslatesongs6042 If Muslims are persecuted in India then why Muslims want citizenship in India through CAA??
@@SubhashishBagchiIf a Muslim is persecuted in his own home, is the solution for him to disown the home? How ridiculous.... Are you even educated? Education and sense of Logic is the weakest link of India...
Everyone who is opposing caa is talking about violation of article 14 but none is talking about violation of The Assam Accord.why??
Only about discrimination of Muslims but nothing for The Assamese.
Your CM is not speaking on it
what's your CM doing?
@@ashishkoge9325 he said,"none outside NRC will be allowed"
Apparently NRC Assam was done in early 2022
How Indian constitutional Article 14 is applicable to foreign refugees in India??
We should not accept anyone no refugees . There is not enough resources for the indian citizens , why should be accept any refugees. Be it from any community or any religion . Totally in support of nrc but not in support of caa.
Sir if CAA is unconstitutional . Then waqf act , minority commission, 1991 worship act, haaz subsidy is not unconstitutional. If country divide on basis of religion then why not for giving citizenship on basis of religion. Muslim is persecuted on basis of sect or caste in Muslim community. But Muslim, Sikh Hindu is persecuted on basis of religion. If we citizenship to Muslim thy why we given two countries Bangladesh and Pakistan to Muslim. But Jews should be in CAA according to me.
Parliament need to recognise the fact that India was divided on the basis of religion.
We need to get our basics right first.
Though the waqf act is totally unconstitutional i agree on that should be removed. Though monority commission is not constituitional , haaz subsidy was unconstitutional and has been removed, and the 1991 places of worship act is also not unconstitutional.
right
@@sohailansari8027what place of worship act is not unconstitutional , I mean how can't a temple of past which have been demolished and a mosque have been build so I can't take it back what non sense 🤔
It is 100 % unconstitutional
@@mjgaming7603haa bas yahee karlo ab, Jeelo aur Jeene do kya takleef tumhari
Why hasn't the nepotism (Collegium) in the court system changed? There will be plenty of talented lawyers and judges who can be CJI. Since Ahmediya chose Pakistan, now they should reap the benefits of it, we are not responsible for them.
? Pakistani Hindus
@@pranjalahluwalia9115Pakistani Hindus did not choose Pakistan but it was imposed on them. Many able to come to Bharat through blood shed and many could not.
@@chinmaya021 agreed no body choose partition making distinction that somebody remained in pakistan or India is their choice is fools falacy
@@pranjalahluwalia9115nobody chooses partition,are you a fool . 99% of Indian Muslim voted for a separate Islamic nation ,it's a fact 😂😂
@@anushkasharma7334 sure miss you can share the link where I can read and increase my knowledge. we had a communal electorate at that time which meant Muslim voters would vote exclusively for Muslim seats. provinces from current day India -places like Bombay and Madras, which had zero chance of being part of a future Pakistan - gave a 100% mandate to Jinnah.
Muslims voted for Muslim league by your logic everyone voting for bjp is voting for hindutva?
The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity. - Said by Baba shaheb Ambhedkar
Ex;actly. An'd this w;hat we are see;ing to;day.
Totally agreed
Sir i am not upsc aspirant but still i watch ur video because u tell ground reality
Pakistan and Bangladesh must implement CAA for Muslim in India🎉❤🎉
😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
@@vish6618 kahe huss rahe ho ye Muslim ka huk he
Please I beg,
They did... It's called partition and it worked out well for them 🙄
Sir, what I think is we are forgetting the intention of law passed by the Parliament. It's not at all about granting citizenships. That can be done under Part-2 of the constitution and under Citizenship Act. The present discourse on CAA is about restituting the ill effects on those who were not the cause of the Partition in which Ahmadias do not come in. It's civilizational duty too to correct the mistakes for those to fought for their beliefs system against Islamic Fundamentalism which took 2 pieces of the land.
Its just votes .all your Mps children's live are tooo SUPER RICH. observe around you. U chose Gundas
Ho gya? Toxicity in its peak@@starrysky1128
I am not UPSC aspirant but well educated 45 Yr old. I have lived in US for many years. The real question is How can we help minorities of other countries WHEN our own citizens are under threat. What are we able to do for our own countrymen? Just publishing fake GDP numbers doesn't mean India is progressing - 80cr people are living on 5kg ration from govt. This CAA is purely to bring on poor from other countries and get thier votes. Indian citizens and democracy is hijacked by BJP and they are playing this game just for votes. Every sensible country only importing well educated top line people into thier country. We are exporting all our top talent because people are fed up of the system in India. CAA will make it worse.
😂 Humare yaha aisa hi hota h. Apne rog ko chhod hr kiska ilaaj h
This is what happens when people believe that they are well educated because they have lived in USA , they may write Sharma in their name but wrap janyu around their Genitals, and comeup with logics like these 👏👏
We are exporting all our top talent because of freebies and reservation and our oldest party congress say if Congress come in centre then they remove 50% reservation criteria they increase reservation so what we general students do???
Why don't you speak of the huge illegal migrants, mainly muslims who have migrated to India and tmc and congress have made them their vote bank?
Well educated and "fake gdp numbers", selectively criticizing one particular party doesn't make sense. Just having an overview of issues makes your statements baseless
The problem with this CJI’s son’s argument is that he has no clue what this laws root cause was… he is ill informed. Congress under Nehru / Gandhi did not wanted India to split into multiple countries of afghan Pakistan or Bangladesh till the day of partition.. simply because Gandhi was a eccentric man who had more power to decide on what’s good for Pakistanis of partition time because of Congress treating him like god. If Gandhi was ready to work with British around 1943 before end of world war 2, British wanted to work with Nehru and Jinnah to plan, border decisions , knowledge transfer and training of Indian and Pakistan bureaucrats before partition was announced so that the transition will be smooth… since Gandhi s adamant nature did not allow British to plan the drawing of borders as well as training of Indians / Pakistanis over the course of 1943 to 1947, British had to forcefully send Mountbatten to decide border and hastily announce independence which lead to blood bath. Gandhi unknowingly was reason for millions of Hindus Muslims Sikhs being massacred… since in this hasty sudden migration, many( Hindus Christian’s Sikhs jains) in villages and remote places who were unaware of how evil a Muslim majority country will become and stayed back. Today their population is almost wiped out and they have come to India and been living as undocumented for decades in India because India does not give them citizenship…
In Pakistan once cannot declare themselves as atheist after being a Muslim. If India gives citizenship to atheists in Pakistan , ISI can send spies in the name of atheists.. also the moment these people announce they are atheist in Pakistan, they will be either 40% lynched by fellow citizens or jailed by Pakistan law. Forget about they getting a chance to come to India… this is a stupid argument from a kid who has lot to learn about India history..: Plus why not Jews and others ? These people never were having any rivalry during partition and were also free to move where they wanted… most likely there will be 6 to 8 Jews who has zero cognitive skills comparable to yours who think they will be able to live in Pakistan where Islamists are waiting ti slay them because of hate that comes from times of 6 th century of Islamic rise.
1. Gandhi "was reason for millions" ? Are you a secret admirer of Jinnah?
2. "India does not give them citizenship" : Why is the India gvt not providing citizenship using the existing laws? Will CAA magically grant citizenship the moment pakistani hindus step their foot on Indian soil?
3. "ISI can send spies in the name of atheists" : What makes you think that ISI will not send spies in the disguise of hindus?
4. Did you forget about the hindus persecuted in Sri Lanka? Are hindus from pakistan more important than hindus from sri lanka?
Thank you Naman sir , since 2 days i have been reading various articles and editorial about this topic but the clarity and an unbiased perspective about CAA which i got from this video is unmatched. Thank you once again for this video !! Jai Hind!!
Wow sir amazing, pls react on waqt board act too 😊 otherwise viewers will say you are paid. Common sir 😊
We are spokes person of India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳.❤❤
Beautiful line and i will remmenber till my death.
God bless you sir.
You are enlighting everyone .
Sir your opinion is correct but the legality of any matter is a different aspect. The amended act doesn't mention Religious prosecution any place. So the ground itself becomes challengeable . Also if they mention about religious prosecution proving the fact that they are doing religious prosecution is close to impossible. India will not even think of losing its only friendly neighbor Bangladesh by dragging them and accusing them of religious prosecution.
Also your reasoning that Ahmadiyya betrayed us in the past and called for division is a vague one. It is right for gaining popular support but not valid in the court of law.
Most underrated comment
It doesn't mention religious persecution bcoz it doesn't matter. Whoever wants to come will just say he or she is religiously persecuted so will u go to Pakistan to check whether he was really persecuted? That's why any Hindu can come bcoz everyone knows what happens to minorities in those countries. That can be proved in court as well so ground is not challengable at all bciz it doesn't go against constitution.
Ahmedia wanted an Islamic nation but that is not the reason for not including them in CAA. Looks like u didn't understand anything from the video.
Most underrated comment. I agree.
@@AmicableAgnostic Why the CAA does not mention Hindus from SriLanka? Are pakistani/bangldeshi hindus more important than SriLankan hindus?
article 14 also has doctrine of reasonable classification as an exception
Abhinav Chandrachud is entitled to make his point, but I do not subscribe to his views. I think he is immature.
Thanks!
You are showing the world how to do in-depth research and analysis, firstly when i saw chandrachur video i thought wow he is so right about CAA but when you gave your response a new dimension opens up, thanks for sharing your thoughts 💭 Naman sir😊😊
Knowledgeable , brave teachers make responsible , aware leaders .. great work
Persuing ca but still love to absorb your opinions. and fun fact is that only people from outside INDIA can give unbiased opinion.
Nailed it. What an articulation. What a great profound knowledge. What a n holistic approach to an issue. Just cannot get better than this. Huge respect for you sir.❤
Hey Naman, completely agree with your views on this. I have just one question with respect to the exclusion of Sri-Lankan Tamils to apply for Indian citizenship via this expedited route. Don't you think they make a strong case for expedited citizenship if we are considering atrocities committed on religious minorities in our neighbouring countries?
Nice viewpoint, your facts changed my thoughts as i was unaware about much of them, i was just thinking about article 14.
Now my stance has changed to pro CAA
Only three years after our Constitution was adopted, its chief architect, BR Ambedkar, publicly disowned it in Parliament. In an astonishing admission in 1953, he blurted out in the Rajya Sabha....several acts had British & American relevance..updation is a must to suit the prevailing era , we support CAA .
Sir i am Bca student but always watching your video. It give us more clearity and amzing viewpoint. Thanx naman sir ❤ love from Bihar
I am from Bihar too
They want that this should not come so that a 13 year old Hindu girl can continue into a forceful marriage with 60 year old man in pakistan.
Hindu m rkha kya h .bharat m jo girls h agar gareeb h to konsi safety h unki? Unka b sbbb forceful hi hota h sir. INSANIYAT rakhiye HEVan na bano .jo hain yahan unko safe rkh ni paye .aaj b koi aurat shaam ko safely akele nahi ja sakti .STOP THIS HYPOCRISY ON NAME OF WOMEN. you men dont deserve women
Upanishadic seriously! Upanishad padh hi liye hote
@@starrysky1128 milord who the hell are you to give certificate of civilization here, how can you prove that women in india is not safe because of the person commented, and by seeing your action and half knowledge I think you are the person molesting women in real life and being champion of civilization of internet
@@starrysky1128 The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity. - Said by Ambhedkar
@@SubhashishBagchi okay, but how is it relevant to the girl's question ? Be relevant with your arguments.
Naman sir your" dynastic " Politics, judiciary ......explanation In India , Give me another level of belligerence. Thanks🙏
Abhinav's logic - Even if there are no Jews in Pak BD then also jews should be written. I mean then what is this CAA left for?
He wants CAA to either solve all the world's humanitarian problem or not exist at all!
Any jew living anywhere in the world is a citizen of Israel under Israel's laws, so why would any jew live as a refugee in india for 6 years when he can go to Israel. That's the reason they've not been mentioned
Did BJP forget Hindus from Srilanka?
@pradeepKarInd not that level persecution compared to others. Atleast there is no violence going on if govt topples even though hindu tamil have no right in constitution
I would love to see both of you (Abhinav and you) on a debate sir. Both the arguments are very compelling and intriguing🔥
Why people don't understand that anyone can get citizenship through registration but govt made special efforts to grant citizenship to religious perscuted people in pak afg and ban.
Because instead of clearing citizenship doubts your modiji do maan ki baat which is bare propaganda and all other bjp mps only do blame game rather than answering simple questions when asked. And the rest confusion is created by congress party the seculars whose sole purpose is to spread fake info about all acts.
@@ashonvills
Tell me I haven't seen a single interview of HM without telling me.🙃
@@SarojSingh-nq5ql are nahi bhai har notifications ko ake khud pm ko samjha nahi chahiye baki Sare log to pagal hai na jo cabinet me hai sb modi ki krle 😂😂
Because common sense is not common.
Census ho ni raha aur addition dekiye. Dimag se socho.kholo use. Persecuted ko hi deal krna h 2 desh ki innumerable women jo prostitution m phasi h unhe rescue krte. Kothe bnd krvate. Mps jo unko back krye h unko presecute krte.
Hats off sir. This was remarkably easy to understand and so simple. Completely unbiased from start to end.
Dear Naman,
Though I agree with you on a major ity of the points, I am skeptical regarding the coverage of the CAA amendment 2019. It fails to include the persecuted tamil speaking hindus in Sri Lanka for reasons unknown to me. In that context I believe it does violate the article 14. Can you please explain your views on the same?
Tamil speaking Hindus in Sri Lanka are persecuted not based on religion. There is a voilent history behind that. It's a separate issue. They are not religious minority.
Excellent, Excellent, Excellent. Proud to have an Indian citizen like him. It's not a mere prepared speech but it's serious and from the heart. Such people are needed to rule out Nation who can be challenging and knowledge. Rahul Gandhi should learn and give way for such people for a brighter India. Rahul Gandhi if he is serious abt India's future he should come out of Congress bond and incorporate all the mighty people with knowledge and skills to bring down the hogus bogus rule in India, even to the extent of sacrificing Prime Minister dream. The ruling party is comfortable with Congress as long as they are INCOMPETANT. He has to seriously think abt it and unite all the competitive people who are really for the welfare of the country from all over India and form a stronger party.
if everyone can become citizens then why they need CAA? enter the border wait 10-11 years and volla.
if they suffered persecution mentally and physically how CAA helps them better than traditional route?
by creating CAA aren't we creating unnecessarily drama ?
why do they want voting rights just by living 5 years? is 5 years enough for them to take decision for the country?
What benefits do they get through CAA? why even wait 4-5 years? why not immediately if citizenship is that necessary for them?
💯💯💯💯 Completely agree! Intent of CAA 2019 is far more important than technical details!
Sir can you please make video on this
Norcet (conducted by AIIMS) nursing officer vacancy
(Pay scale 90k+ per month)
In this exam from last 3 years se 80:20 rule h sir reservation ka on the basis of sex(gender)
For female there are 80% seats reserved only 20% seats are for male and in that 20% we have cast wise reservation also
Last year total 5000 seat were there only 379 seats for male only 120 general seats 💺 for male sir how we can survive sir this level of competition. I scored 66% Mark's in mains but still not got selected...
But students with have less then 45% got seat in AIIMS
Which have lesser knowledge then me less capable then me is going in AIIMS he will assign patients... This establishment why this is still legal and why AIIMS don't have this policy for doctors. Why only nursing officer post why no other post have this type of reservation.
Is this legal?
Why this discrimination is allowed,
AIIMS is already facing issues of not getting skilled personal AIIMS director admitting it because of 80,20 rule
Yhe tho hona hi tha i don't know why they want to continue this illegal policy
ruclips.net/video/P4xPSYTZozE/видео.htmlsi=uI57IylIi-dL-Ktp
Where is equality 1st in this matter I am Indian citizen where is equality, AIIMS is center funded by central government.....
Why male facing discrimination just because I born male why I have face this problem 80.20 remove please
I agree with you
I am Indian why I am still facing discrimination just because I born male 🐏
Why nobody taking about this do you want you go to AIIMS and you admitted in hospital nurse is carrying you is not capable or knowledgeable,she just selected just because she is gril shy this discrimination
No body will talk about this real issue pr koi baat nhi krtha tho common hard working ko affect krthi h sab bs views chaiye so I think if influential log baat krnege tho kch hoga is rule ka
Absolute clarity and precise analysis....Thank-you for making things crystal clear
CAA is notified just to get political mileage as of now. Cutoff Date is 2014, around 9.5 yrs has passed already, not much of the use, If they don't modify the cutoff dates. The main Issue is It will act as a bedrock for future bad policies like NRC, if current government feel threatened about their Central seats, not in 2024, but maybe in 2034, to take advantage of communalism .
😂 o my god. Your sense of logic is just pathetic
Watching this video today and realizing that everything you said in this video between 12:00-15:00 is very true.
Just A Thought...
Mamy times people put common sense aside and follow the constitution.
But we have to understand that Constitution is made by people and for the people of India not people of India born for constitution.
We should first think for Humans then think about constitutional boundaries.
I aporeciate your knowledge against sudo lefitst educationalist. U r not bius. U are loved for your honesty. I admire being Indian . I support ur courage to speak against so called stalvert who became by their position deminishing the indian culture. I respect u .
With due respect I request u to study Assamese version of opposition of so called CAA. Cutoff date from 1951 to 1971 to 2014 now. Why would Assamese people take the burden of religiously persecuted people from erstwhile East Pakistan alone. If govt giving them citizenship through CAA, every state should take some of them.
Yup
abhinav more than challenging the ethical value of CAA,argued how it violates the right to equlity,i agree with abhinav.Naman is supporting his arguments based on moral or historical ground not on constitutional ground
Why isn’t he talking about whats happening with the people in assam because of NRC and CAA… why isn’t he talking about detention camps… people in Assam are in detention camps for 3 years and then it’s proven that oh sorry you are a citizen of India…. Look at both sides of the coin
He is Sangi
Then go to your original country Bangladesh or Pakistan.
@@combinedstudy6427 😂🤣🙏🙌 every andhbakt fr bro 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂
@@TumhariBuaKiLadkimullas coping mechanisms
This is a very good view.And,we have done this in last 1000 years ,it's a part of our culture .We are secular not because of the constitution,but an inherit trait of our culture.This concept of accepting people from every creed in present times is not in the country's interest.As there are some groups who do not revere this concept and will only destroy the culture of our country .In my opinion CAA is in India's interest.
CJI >>CJI>>> potential CJI?
We are Talking About Judiciary.... what's your thoughts on that sir? Isn't it harmful for India?
He's just stating the obvious trend. No point being in denial about the reality.
Very good argument in favour of CAA bill. Thanks for making this video.
The whole process of appointment of CJI is stupid. CJI's son will be the new CJI, that is completely stupid and unethical. There should be a fair process and competition to all the posts in Bharat. And people should not question CAA is ethical or unethical. It's for minorities, in our three neighboring countries, and we Hindus are also transitioning from Majority to Minority. We should have Bharat as our and ours Land only FULL STOP.
Thank you for this nuanced understanding of CAA without any political or religious biases. I hope more people watch this video and learn to analyze such policies without their political or religious biases.
EXCELLENT ANALYSIS NAMAN SIR
Sir can you please make video on this
Norcet (conducted by AIIMS) nursing officer vacancy
(Pay scale 90k+ per month)
In this exam from last 3 years se 80:20 rule h sir reservation ka on the basis of sex(gender)
For female there are 80% seats reserved only 20% seats are for male and in that 20% we have cast wise reservation also
Last year total 5000 seat were there only 379 seats for male only 120 general seats 💺 for male sir how we can survive sir this level of competition. I scored 66% Mark's in mains but still not got selected...
But students with have less then 45% got seat in AIIMS
Which have lesser knowledge then me less capable then me is going in AIIMS he will assign patients... This establishment why this is still legal and why AIIMS don't have this policy for doctors. Why only nursing officer post why no other post have this type of reservation.
Is this legal?
Why this discrimination is allowed,
AIIMS is already facing issues of not getting skilled personal AIIMS director admitting it because of 80,20 rule
Yhe tho hona hi tha i don't know why they want to continue this illegal policy
ruclips.net/video/P4xPSYTZozE/видео.htmlsi=uI57IylIi-dL-Ktp
Where is equality 1st in this matter I am Indian citizen where is equality, AIIMS is center funded by central government.....
Why male facing discrimination just because I born male why I have face this problem 80.20 remove please
Thank you so much sir. whenever i have any doubt or m confused to form opinion you are my go to person. The way you explained things in simplest way with facts is astounding.
You should do your own research and listen to both side of the arguments , know both sides of the coin and then form your OWN OPINION .
Dear ,
Not everyone's opinion is totally right....all have different opinions with some good and some bad sides....
But in this video many point are absolutely right...but some are very wrong...like BCCI chairman.....
I agree that Hindu tourched in Pak and Bangladesh ....but what about Muslim and Sikh in there own country... Muslim are also tourched by Hindus to chant Jai shree ram....and They called Muslims of India are also terrorist and Sikhs are khalistani.....what that fuck this is......
So think with open mind and then react on that particular situation or statement...
Aman sir I'm not your follower I'm your fan , but here I'm not agree with you...... because
(1). If any one get Indian citizenship through traditional method than why CAA , you don't think it is only for political gain
(2) citizenship through citizenship act 1955 , is this law only for Muslim,
(3). Sir what about article 14,
(4) Why we share our resources with other, first we need to empower our citizens , we all know our unemployment rate in our country
5). If it is not political gain stand, if this law was really good, than why mr shah was waiting for 2024 election.
I have many other concern if you permit than I will share my concern...
.
Because there is a large protest in 2019
Even it is done for political gain. Why you worry after all politics is power. We want power in our hand.
1) Already hindus, sikhs, and other minorities live a life like hell in those countries, and then they come here again to live in hell? As there is no proper facility for them, check out how they live in indian without citizenship.
2)Muslims can become the citizens, that s the final point.
3) It is not about population, it is about ending the horrific persecution and bringing them here, atleast they will live here and not be killed in pakistan.
4) Mr shah implemented it after the 2024 election, not before because then the stupid opposition will use it as an excuse of interfering with elections.
In India we favour a lot of religious stuffs that should be re-thinked. You have articulated this matter well and within the boundaries and I love this fact as there is no end to this. I could only wish if you bring more of such matters in this channel as to bring down the disinformation. I am a fellow aspirant in this domain and more like me and not me are there to get jolt down the facts and boundaries of such laws or concern. Best wishes for India as she is moving ahead despite many challenges.
Brilliant analysis and very objective argument in favour of CAA. It is important to understand the history, impact and complete context of a situation before judging it superficially. Abhinav's arguments apprared to be immature, uninformed and lacked depth of understanding of history and geopolitics. I can bet that Abhinav C. will never be the CJI unless he shows maturity and a deeper understanding of Indian and global history, geopolitics and a need for immediate corrective action to save lives.
Truly agree. Sikhs are there in Iran.
I am not an UPSC aspirant but I watch you it’s empowered me . Thank you
Such immaturity BY CJI's son how can only reference of single Article Is correct ....you have to consider the Constitution as a whole and not just refer 3 lines as per your need.
As Article 14 treats everybody as equal, it not about percentage wise Equal,you can still classified by categories and provide the special Treatment/law/acts. Even there are so many special treatment already in Practice which affects Much larger population than the CAA act.
Every new video gives me a new perspective of thinking.
Thanks a lot Sir ✨️
Some say why aren't the tamil refugees from sri Lanka, settled in TN covered in these laws
No one is answering this important point. Right-wingers are only concerned about "hindus" from Pak and Bangladesh, i.e. from Islamic countries.
Thats what a well read well informed person is supposed to speak .... Great words 👍
Article 14 is for Indian citizen not outside
😀😀😀😀😀
You are wrong, article 14 is for everyone, citizens as well as non-citizens
18:14 loved the way you exposed the nepotism 😂 great analysis sir
Its not unconstitutional. its only a one way of giving citizenship not the only way .....
Sir we need a detailed discussion on the collegium system of Indian Judiciary.... Your words making me knowledgeable at every aspect ❤
ସାର୍ ଆମକୁ ଭାରତୀୟ ନ୍ୟାୟପାଳିକାର କଲେଜିୟମ୍ ସିଷ୍ଟମ୍ ଉପରେ ଏକ ବିସ୍ତୃତ ଆଲୋଚନା ଆବଶ୍ୟକ ... ତୁମର ଶବ୍ଦ ମୋତେ ପ୍ରତ୍ୟେକ ଦିଗରେ ଜ୍ଞାନବାନ କରେ |❤
Looks like he’s very biased not talking about the people of agnostic or atheist. Talk about such points. Is it violating article 14? Say yes or no.
This is a great unbiased analysis. Couple of other points to be addressed - ( these are not tied to constitutional vs unconstitutional argument)
1). How do you differentiate between religous persecution and just economic problems as someone's real reason to migrate?
2). How do we avoid misuse of this Act by whichever parties are in power.
Thanku for opening eyes of many who are anti india
Man I wish we could get this whole conversation❤❤❤ #zeher 🙏🏻🙏🏻
I am not biased and support Modiji.
Golden content. And eye opener. End to all non sense debate. Thanks naman for bringing truth and objective facts to support your argument
I don't know why nobody is speaking about one of the most crucial point about partition. Any non-muslim from our neighbouring countries should be natural citizens of Bharat. It's because once Bharat was partitioned based on muslims and non-muslims, the asset sharing also happened based on the population of the two. Assets were shared proportional to the muslim and non-muslim population, speculating a complete migration between the two. That is why there were even talks of population exchange when such complete migration didn't happen.
What it essentially means is that Bharat holds the share of assets on non-muslims while it has given away the share of assets of muslims. Hence, any non-muslim in our neighbours are natural citizens of Bharat, while muslims aren't.
Thank you, Mr Naman. We need more people like you in this rashtra who serve the great mother.
Mr. Naman you have to extend the quality of your research. Rely on credible sources. Try to be less judgmental.
Well counter point I'm amazed by your reasoning.
Sir i want to know why i get impressed by other people points easily is it due lack of facts and knowledge of my own or any other reason?
Okay, but don't make assumptions that just because someone's father and grandfather is/was CJI, so he will be CJI for sure. Abhinav has just put forth his arguments and you've all the right to go against his arguments. But, no need to target him or his family personally. And, even if he becomes CJI someday, it doesn't mean that he's incapable or untalented to hold that position.
@PMcse Yes, I thik that he exemplifies the singular capability of ascending to the position of CJI, much akin to how Mr. Jay embodies unparalleled proficiency in leading BCCI, Mr. Akhilesh demonstrates exceptional competence in steering SP, and Mr. Rahul symbolizes the epitome of potential in assuming the role of PM. What an incredulous assertion, my friend. Take heed of Sir's words attentively and then reevaluate your own comment. Whether you acknowledge it or not, it's an undeniable reality that a dynastic propensity pervades every sphere.Sir is neither endorsing nor condemning it; he is merely articulating it as a verifiable truth. Moreover, if we were in their shoes, the likelihood is high that the same trajectory would ensue for us as well. In essence, if we were to occupy positions such as CJI or ministers, the hereditary continuum would likely extend to our progeny.
He will bash and educated person like abhinav, son of CJI. But he can never bash an illiterate chaiwalla. So nothing is unbiased as they potray it!! Godi influencer!!
Interesting part is son of CJI and his education only came into question after CJI decision on electoral bonds. So it is not a rocket science for logical person to understand who is paying for this narrative and who is being targeted for public display.
Bhaisaab, apne judicial collegate system is full of examples of nepotism and groupism. There good chances he will quickly climb the judicial ladder because of this
True bro
I love this channel very much ...thank you sir for being here !!!❤❤❤❤
Why so much politics is being done in the name of CAA ??
Why it's been notified just before the elections?
its was announced 2-4 years back dude
Then the govt kept silent about it.. time to time raised it in non-bjp state elections
And then dropped it again just at dawn of announcement of LS elections
It's as clear as water@@Ash-lb3gb
@@cia1894 mannohan singh , on the satge of the parliament said we have an urgent need and a moral obligation to implement caa in 2012
was that a political stunt too?, if we go by that logic govt should do nothing in elections years
just yesterday they inaugurated sela turnal
they shouldn’t had , its an political stunt too
@@cia1894 is removal of 370 , and G20 was a political stunt too?
@@cia1894it makes no difference
Right to equality of article 14 is equality among equals not on equality among unequals...This answers the 21:00 question.
Sir, what about those Muslims who will temporarily convert themself to Hindus to get Indian Citizenship and will follow their Muslim belief after getting Citizenship?
How can you know .
Bro muslims can't do that, they cannot accept a kafirs faith.
Arrey bhai tou convert hoga tou sarkar nahi dekhenge ki kab convert hua hai. Matlab sarkar ko chutiya samjhe ho kya. They do thorough inspection before acting. This is not congress , ki mumbai blast hote rahe aur yahan hindu terror par book launch karne mei Home minister busy ho.
That's happening with reservation As well from long time.
There is no way to quantify it
The line of thought, the depth and the way of arguing makes you more respectable. Hats off to you Naman sir
A person who graduted from Cambridge what do u expect from it😂
I appreciate you saying very directly that we are overly complicating practical realities with theory just to frame arguments…. That’s what we do, we create arguments , we frame narratives not to address what needs to be achieved but what we as biased human being want to achieve… we bend facts and data to achieve want we want rather than what is needed… and we think of ourselves as intelligent human being… the fact in this whole debate is no one is denied citizenship in India but CAA has another purpose altogether which tries to address a particular problem… it has lacunas but tries to solve which is appreciable…
Rahul be like : Bhai Naman mujhe kyon dhoya...
Good insight... But to best of my understanding - at least in India - the protest against CAA started mainly with Amit Shah and BJP started stating that CAA along with NRC and NPR will be used to get rid of illegal Muslims immigrants in India.. HE linked both these - CAA and NRC ..
Thank you for making it easy to understand CAA
Opposition is raising issues of common poor peoples of india regarding their businesses which is struggling in current government rule and saying to empower the small businesses and raising issues about youth unemployment which is almost double till 2023 October in a country where 55% of population is youth and well as high inflation also which this current b.j.p government has promised to decrease before 2014 election with reference slogan like ' bahut hui mehngai ki maar abki baar modi sarkar ' . And these all issues are of most of the people of india I think of around 70% people of india. And these are all the main issue regarding common peoples life of this country. And still if they not credible compare to this lying b.j.p government. Who is just deceived the country with their fake promises on job to youth , inflation , doubled up the income of farmers and m.s.p . And with that insulting the constitution and democracy by controlling all the government institutions unethical way to win the election like Chandigarh election , by using e.d , c.b.i for suppressed the voices who against their policies. They are destroying main principals of constitution like ethics and morals . I think as a common people as for the countrys most people's perspectives opposition is raising right issue of this country . And for me my country is each and every individual of this country
People reacted because it was said that NRC with CAA can be used in a questionable manner. Bcz in NRC citizenship will be tested based on documents and a failure to do so worried people. Birth certificate is a valid document and it is widely said that we need to provide not only ourself but also our forefathers birth certificates but birth certificate was not made mandatory until 1970. Documentation system and its preservation of our society is bit questionable before digitalization. In short can you answer that if NRC and CAA together pose an significant issue.
Really appreciate your work and effort.
My question is then what's the point of CAA? If Citizenship act already provides for the naturalization process of 11 years for anyone who wants the citizenship. Why bring the CAA to fast track the Citizenship process, it's not like government is going to do anything to make the life of refugees in any better.. I doubt the intention behind it. Please help me understand..
it is actually a good point you rose but let me tell you instead ...Naman give example of Adnan Sami he was stateless for 1 year before being citizen of India there is news article where he mention its draw backs. Refugee has numerous restriction until and unless he is some rich dude and trust me we guys are still arguing on legal way for citizen ship thee are other ill legal way from which Bangladeshi and Rohingyas are getting in . Politicians give them all these same citizenships resources the matter of months they come to India for being vote bank. I beileve Illegal part need to be explored more....we might have a secret Invasion built up under our nose.
BJP want votes of the refugee as well as of the majority by selling the propaganda that minorities in Pakistan Bangladesh and Afghanistan are treated inhumanly but their own party agenda is to treat minority is very well known to the masses
Actually, why do we need CAA?? It only means letting in more people and anyways we are already a very densely populated country. Not to mention the strain kn resources with so much poverty still not maneged.
Both the leading parties have only been interested in votebanks, not in trying to solve the issues already at hand and create division in ppl community whether by action or reaction. Really sad to see how bad politicians can ruin a great country
6:32 Sir my openion this bill is for the religious presecution those who are in minority in the 3 country. And also founding leader promised to the minority people that it is our responsiblity when they want to live in india we accept open heartly. Afterall we promise to the people.
Many people left 20. 30 bigha of land because they not feel to safe.
Muslim is not a minority in pakistan/Bangladesh/Afghanistan.....if u will tell me that ahamadiyas are persecuted minority in pakistan then it's not my fucking problem to welcome him into india, he went to pakistan in his own accord., that's a infighting between muslims, for me he is not a minority, he is just a muslim, we won't allow muslims from pak/Bangladesh to live in india , cope with it
Sir my question is that if CAA is granted will the state people will accept those refugees in their state...sir in my state we indigenous people are becoming minority and refugees are becoming majority and they enjoy all your rights it this continues we indigenous people will be no longer will be inexistence. I'm not against CAA but I don't want those refugees to be residing in my State
CAA as of now is only applicable for people who applied for it before 2014
that is roughly 1000 chaps
so, iam pretty sure 1000 chaps coming in india wont make anyone minority
Reason why NE is being deprived!!!
@@Ash-lb3gb so by that data there is 0.0000001 % percentage of persecution of non Muslims in Pakistan Bangladesh and Afghanistan.
@@uh8891 not everyone who is oppressed can come through fastrack(CAA)
govt has set a cap of 2014 so only (1k) people registered
if govt extends the cap date from 2014 to 2020 the number can grow 100 folds
@@Ash-lb3gb Do you know according to data between 2015 to 2020 , 13 lakh people accepted Islam ? Govt has also put a cap over there and brought a bill anti conversion bill tell them to remove it . We can see many more non Muslim accepting Islam.
that tabish guy was factfully slapped on face by Naman
best analysis
we will become spokeperson of India
Can we please get the full version of this video ?
In modern day ex:- giving khalistani and making amendment (caa) khalistani eligible to get citizenship in india what make sense in that
if india dont take that step minority's get eradicate in those country's, (IF INDIA DONT DO THAT NO ONE CAN DO), this make burden on 🇮🇳 india (scarce resources) our people will suffer irrespective of religion, caste for food, shelter and mainly for water
POV:- if india do not strict on this regard no future for india (may be india not exist in future) china Pakistan will occupy india, india Already fragmented because of partition pak🇵🇰, Epak🇧🇩, 🇦🇫 etc study history, india must be strict on this case
Sir i heard this thing started from nehru liyakat pack is that true please cover that also.
I am a Muslim and i support citizenship amendment bill❤❤ Muslims and christians have many options but hindus have only 2 options.. Hindus being the majority of the country should enjoy this privilege.
Please explains about century long nepotism in temples in india.