Quick Sync H 264 Vs Nvidia NVENC H 264

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 сен 2024
  • We are doing a quick comparison of Intel & Nvidia encoder options on OBS.

Комментарии • 7

  • @LUP1Ntv
    @LUP1Ntv 24 дня назад +3

    My system is
    14700k
    4070ti super
    64gb 5600mhz D5 Ram
    Asus pg27aqn 1440p 360hz,
    I was streaming using Nvench, I see my framerates get hit about 10-20% loss And gameplay doesnt feels smooth.I was searching forums for Quick sync settings and guide ,there are literally very few people talk about this, my igpu just sitting on my cpu doing nothing, why not use it if the quality is similar to Nvench and get the maximum fps in the dedicted gpu. Very informative video man keep it up, everyone should talk about this.

    • @Samtation
      @Samtation  2 дня назад

      Hey Lup1ntv, I'm actually really happy you left a positive review on my video. Thank you so much! 🙌🏾 also, your system specs are fire!

  • @Sufy-ei9zj
    @Sufy-ei9zj 3 месяца назад +1

    Based off a video from EposVox, he said that QSV is 2-6% better than NVENC H.264. Maybe your settings aren’t optimized or Nvidia has updated their codec since then.
    I’ve seen people say not to stream at 1080p 60fps anyways if you do not have transcoding from Twitch as people with bad internet may not be able to view your stream. I know some people who set their stream to 720p 60fps, 936p 60fps, 1080p 30fps, etc because 1080p 60fps just isn’t suitable for 6kbps bitrate.
    Personally, I have an AMD GPU, and their codec sucks. Luckily I have a i9 12900k Intel CPU with the same iGPU as you, so I can get basically the same quality as NVENC H.264 with it.

    • @Samtation
      @Samtation  3 месяца назад

      These are facts! I agree with you all the way. I have recently tried to ignore the bitrate limit from Twitch and streamed at the recommended 8kbps and received a horrible response from my viewers. Saying it's very blocky. But my goal is to figure out how non partner streamers can give their viewers the best viewing experience at 1080p 60fps. So far, Intel really made the difference. As for Nvidia, it's still the best option in terms of visual pleasure, but with me being a heathen and always max out my graphics, I will always hit this performance dip 😩. But I did let Nvidia optimize my graphics, and it performs well under load with OBS, but my current Asus 3070ti has a slight issue keeping up with some of these games at max graphics. But that's actually my next video. I'm working on resolution quality based on 1080p 60fps vs 900p 60fps (before I upgrade to their newest card when that comes out. ) And lol, tell me about it. AMD codec can use some work) Hopefully, they fix it, but my heart goes to Intel, and Nvidia

    • @LUP1Ntv
      @LUP1Ntv 24 дня назад +1

      864p 6000kbps worked really great with Nvenc , have to try Quick Sync. If its similar , I will stay with QSYNC and get my 20% fps back from my 4070ti Super

  • @gumoretto1
    @gumoretto1 3 месяца назад +1

    what you recommend? Qsv or nvenc ? (H264) twitch

    • @Samtation
      @Samtation  3 месяца назад +2

      That would truly depend on your GPU. I tend to run max graphics on all of my games so I would recommend QSV if you're like me. But if you don't care about running all of your games on Max Graphics by all means use NVENC. You will have a better-quality stream.