I like how in-character everyone is in this erb. Ivan's not here to be the best rapper, he's here to cheat with murder. Pompey doesn't get to participate. Alexander's high-speed verse laden with wordplay gives the impression that he's simply more talented at battle than the rest and he could probably keep going fore- oops he died. Also you missed the bar that Frederick gave about paying a guy to tear out his eyes. That was a shot at the time Ivan tore out that one architects eyes after he built a cathedral for Ivan to prevent him from ever building anything as impressive again.
Asia is the correct description for the area Alexander conquered in his time. Asia wasn't referred to as Asia until recently. With Asia being the Middle East and India and the Orient being what we refer to as East Asia or Asia today.
I was about to make this comment, 'Asia' was the Greek name for Anatolia, Persia, exactly the territories Alexander conquered. He sent helmets back from his battles inscribed 'won from the barbarians who live in Asia', paraphrased. Why Asia refers to the far east China-dominated world in modern U.S parlance I don't know, but even in modern U.K an 'Asian' denotes someone like a Pakistani, not Chinese.
@@chingizzhylkybayev8575 historically in classical/hellenistic times, Asia refers to Persia, Anatolia, that part of the world. At some point it became the name of the continent (which geographically speaking, includes Europe - Europe is only a continent by convention, not by geography it's a big peninsula of Asia) which includes China, well done for pointing that out, we could all do with reminding
@@helvete_ingres4717 Not sure I would agree with the line about modern U.K. I can confirm that at least as an individual if someone says Asian my first thought is likely to be Indian/Pakistani, but I certainly include the Chinese, Koreans, Japanese etc etc within my concept of 'Asian'.
The horse story was put about by her enemies after her death. She was fairly promiscuous, but certainly no more than most kings of her age. People were just extra offended because she was a woman. Because Peter III didn't seem interested in consumating their marriage there's a good chance her heir wasn't fathered by him, but by one of her many lovers. She actually had someone who's job it was to inspect how well endowed potential lovers were. On Frederick, the first time I watched this video I knew exactly who the referred to when they said "flute busting Prussian." He's always has been one of my favorites. There's some pretty good evidence that he preferred men, but of course we'll never know for sure.
Since paige doesn’t really EXPLAIN what the horse story was, her enemies spread rumors that she died while “hoo-haahing” a horse, when i’m pretty sure she actually died of a stroke in the bath.
Catherine the Great actually died of a stroke. The "horse story" was circulated by British and French satirical newspapers and magazines some time later.
This was one of the best-crafted ERBs. Ivan was never supposed to "win", but kept winning due to really underhanded tactics, which is true to his character in real life.
13:23 this is a reference to Fredrick's best known technique, which he called the “oblique order,” he explained it as follows: a commander should strengthen one wing of his army and employ it to attack the enemy flank, while holding back another, smaller wing to threaten the enemy's main force and keep it from changing position. Basically, the stronger wing of the army would attack from a single flank while the weaker one would pose a threat of direct frontal attack (but not actually attack) with the goal of breaking the enemy on that flank and rolling up the enemy army.
So MANY Easter eggs in this one. They really brought the research putting this together. "I weep, it's all too easy" is probably a reference to the saying "Alexander wept, for he had no more worlds to conquer." I have heard that the shot at 12:47 with Ivan's shadow looming in the background is taken from an early 20th-Century Russian film about Ivan. The pose Fredrick strikes at the start on one foot with the flute is from a Jethro Tull album cover. It is said that Ivan gouged out the eyes of the architect of St. Basil's Cathedral, so that the poor guy would never make anything as great again. Look closely at the handles of the garrote Catherine used. She liked to use a certain... motif in decor to upset the more prudish Russians. Great battle. One of my faves.
I love this one, I don't believe I didn't notice earlier that you didn't do it. One part you didn't mention that I find very interesting is Frederick's "I would pay a guy to tear out my eyes if I had to look at your troll face every night" which is a reference to a legend in which Ivan gouged the eyes of Postnik Yakovlev, the builder of Saint Basil's Cathedral , so that he can never build anything so beautiful again. I actually think I like Frederick's verse here the most, short but full of references and a great upbeat melody driving it.
When Alexander said the line with "Expansion Pack", that is a refference to the expansion pack for the game Rome Total War, named Alexander, bringing us the campaign for the game where you play as Alexander and conquer all of those lands
Peter III. was not only Tsar of Russia but also a duke or something in the northern part of Germany (Holstein) which he greatly preferred over being in Russia if I remember correctly and he spent a lot of time there also didn't want to be on the bad side with Prussia, while Catherine the Great was much more interested in making Russia a strong power in Europe or expanding the power. I like how everyone dies the way they died in history (or are supposed to) except for Catherine basically saying "nah that was just lies from the men who didn't like a powerful woman to do what they do" :D
Love these breakdowns, and how you skip back a few seconds after you commentary to make sure nothing is missed. Most reaction RUclipsrs do not do that, so I really appreciate it.
I'm obsessed- also, congratulations on hitting both goals I've seen on your videos! The last one I watched you had the road to 20K and you were already there! I love EBR, and hearing about these wordplay choices and themes from a historical context- well, I'm learning things! Thank you for such an awesome source of edutainment!
I really appreciate how they just made Ivan Terrible, nothing more than terrible. In the way he raps to the gifts he offers and especially the horse bit
Your excitement and energy when jumping onto the bits of knowledge and the references in the work is infectious :D very enjoyable to watch and happily subscribed
Bro I just discovered you and I really like your channel especially how you’re breaking down every bar with prior knowledge it’s very insightful and it makes me geek out
I have to say, of all the ESRB reaction videos, yours is the best. I was specifically looking for videos that break down the history facts of and you do it perfectly with rewinds, break down of lines and your personal interpretations of the bars based on history facts.
I SWEAR I remember when Pompey popped up him going NO SIR, and saying something similar to "What do you have to offer but it was a more intense response... But Its not there...
If you think about it, the thing with Alexander is correct. The quote specifically said, if you can UNTIE this not, you will be master of all of Asia. He didn't untie it, he destroyed it by cutting it in half and the mutiny prevented him from conquering all of Asia and he died shortly after.
Well, that is not what that verse meant. During the times of Alexander the Great, the name "Asia" was used differently to how it used today. Today, it refers to the largest geopolitical region in the world, but back then, the name "Asia" was how they referred to Turkey, strictly speaking. What we call "Asia" today was referred to as the Far East back then. As such, it is not inaccurate for Alexander to suggest he conquered Asia: the region that went by that name at that time was indeed conquered by him.
Ivan is known for poisoning his enemies. I’ve heard a story that he had a special cup made that turned any liquid into poison (possibly made of hemlock). He would offer a drink from it to anyone who displeased him. The people knew of the cup but refusing the tsar was unthinkable, so they’d usually say goodbye to their loved ones first
I usually see people who are so-called history buffs react to things and they barely even know very much or even react to things but you are very good at reacting to the video and very knowledgeable in the history
didn´t know, that you have that much knowledge about history. glad to learn from you sir. i would enjoy watching more history related breakdowns from you
I actually saw a show recently and THEY said the horse rumour was spread by a political rival of Catherine's AFTER her death to discredit her. Easy to spread such things when the person's not there to defend themselves.
the vodka line is referencing how one of the markers of good 'standard' vodka is a neutral flavor. There are traditional vodkas styles whose process intentionally adds flavor, but the standard type should generally go down with very little flavor or burn. Smooth, flavorless, and with nuances that come out in the aftertaste. Didn't come across as shade toward vodka, since 'flavorless' is a compliment to vodka. Just a dig at Ivan's mic skills.
at 13:41 with Fredrick the Great playing flute and lifting his leg is a reference to Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull as he'd do that a lot on stage and prance around and stuff
Copulating with a stallion and the harness breaking loose is the best description I have heard of the story about Catherine. Well played, sir. Well played. 👍
That's kinda the thing, the "official" documentation describes she had a stroke on the toilet. But, that's just a little too far fetched considering who she was and the kind of power she held. My theory is that she was poisoned by people tired of a woman leading the country. They managed to convince the physician to say it was just a stroke so that they save face, and nobody would know because history is written by the survivors. She didn't likely die from a horse though. That's mostly from anti-Russian satire from England and France (who were getting scrubbed up and down by Russia during Catherine's reign).
I liked how much of the history you fleshed out in this video. I've seen a few of other historians covering this ERB. Although they explained those pretty well, I thought you did a kinda better job. A little disappointed you didn't catch some of the things in Frederick's verse, or his epic flute solo, but otherwise great vid.
10:18 I think there’s a funny setup with the birds to pots reference: not only the helmet Alexander wears having feathers/the destruction of vases and monuments/art, (both historic/mythos related works depicting imagery of a person/legacy/fame), but also the destruction of common household tradition at that time of leaving pots/pottery outside one’s house to attract birds which would then nest inside the household item. (Signifying someone had a nice home by having wild birds choosing it as a good nest sight/ liking the pots/pottery saying you have good items/ the ability to get free eggs/meat if times get rough.) This line leads right into the next verse of destroying city’s/homes and I felt like it was a subtle nod to understanding myths/common practices of those eras both war myths and daily myths/life (and history of pottery uses) the warrior uses vs common people. while also referencing historical vases/works not only common peoples items (usually hand produced pottery or sculptures so breaking it was a rude gesture of vandalism/conquest)
Ivan was also poisoning the cup before he gives it to Alexander, as he half turns away. Ivan's daughter-in-law was dressed too lightly for the weather.
Oblique attack tactics involves massing your troops on one flank to try to break through the enemy lines there and crush the enemy quickly. It can work well but it can also work terribly if the enemy breaks through the rest of your weakened battle line. Frederick was known for such tactics. But he was also losing to Russia when the old empress died and Peter III took the throne. He returned all the Russian territorial gains to Frederick and made peace, alienating the army. It’s one of the main things that led to his coup
Yes, I loved these on late night TV. A history buff as well, I get the jokes. Smart comedy. May I add that i someday hope to live next door to someone like you. An analytical, funny, history buff who enjoys thinking, pondering. And likes lots of kinds of music. Family game night would be EPIC. Love you, and your channel!
Frederick's bar "I've got creative talents and battle malice" is a reference to him being one of the poster examples of the 'Enlightened Absolutism", in which monarchs would take over some ideas from the Enlightenment movement and have more eye for what the common people wanted or needed, but still staying in their positions as absolute monarchs. A saying from that time referencing that movement is "Everything *for* the people, nothing *by* the people".
I have never seen a reaction video done better than by you. I can't stand those people who react to videos and they just go like eh that was good or that was bad. You actually dissected the video and gave quality review of the entirety bit by bit. Thank you good sir.
Another thing from the "little Vasilyvich" line I think is a reference that his grandfather, Ivan III Vasilyvich, was known as Ivan the Great, so Ivan the Terrible would be "little" in comparison or something like that.
I believe the line "Greek for the glory I got, for winning every single war that I fought." Is a reference to the fact Alexander was ofcourse in fact not actually 'Greek' but Macedonian, but after his success and victories they basically adopted him as one of their own.
Frederick's line referring to "tearing his own eyes out" relate to a story about Ivan the Terrible allegedly tearing out a famous architect's eyes after creating a beautiful structure over a Saint's grave. This was intended to prevent him from ever making anything more beuatiful than that. It was because he loved it so much, or something?
Catherine the Great actually did die of a stroke, though she died at her desk. One of her ladies-in-waiting found her slumped on the floor surrounded by papers.
Frederick called himself the first servant of the state, because he did not see it as the state serving him but him serving his people. Also, fun fact, prussia was called "not a state with a military but a military that happens to be a state"
Frederick The Great, if I remember correctly, was also the first King of Prussia. He inherited the title of King in Prussia from his father and conquered enough territory to become King of Prussia. That might be the meaning of the phrase First Servant of State.
Alexander taming Bucephalus was a widely repeated story because Philip II had the best trainers and none could break the horse. Bu wasn't just wild, he was considered feral. Alexander approached him and understood that he was afraid and all these people trying to saddle him and whip him and all this ridiculousness... he was spooked by his shadow. It was one of the key moments in his diefication as son of Zeus. Philip II was terrified of Alexander at the end of his life. He and Bucephalus were legendary, when Bu died, all the horses in the empire (well, capital) were to be shaved in mourning. Alexander was amazing at joining peoples but he wasn't building a lasting empire, they followed him and his inner circle were serpents - that's why it's believed Hephaestus and then Alexander, in the resulting fit of depression, were poisoned, Alex most likely by his own medicine given to him to try and rouse him from his "sickness." Yea, serpents the lot of them. Imagine what he could have done with 40, 60 years. Philip couldn't even conquer the Hellenes (the grouping of similarly cultured independent city states that we retroactively call Greece but was not united until Alexander campaigned in his father's war), meanwhile the Egyptians basically worshipped him when he arrived and went to the temple of Zeus Amon, declared son of... well, the Sun, basically. (Depending if we're talking Amon Ra or not). He was the greatest conqueror in history, not because of an empire he built, but because most of his people willingly bent the knee, so to say. He conquered more through discussions and respect, through being viewed as a demigod, through charm and intelligence, than he did by the sword. His tale is one of the most interesting tales when it comes to history's leaders because he didn't have ridiculous machinations behind his actions. He sought knowledge and culture, sharing ways to improve life and learning from his new subjects when they had better ways. Arrian wrote hundreds of pages of a romance between Alexander and his peoples, his Patrocolus (because he also took on the helm of Achilles), his horse even, and the great comedy was strung together and then cut like that Gordian Knot, fraying into tragedy suddenly and completely.
"He conquered more through discussions and respect, through being viewed as a demigod, through charm and intelligence, than he did by the sword." No! No, he didn't! What on earth would possess you to believe that?!
@@johnirby8847 having read the histories? The numerous accountings of his campaigns? The vivid descriptions of some battles, seemingly as far as historians can determine, cooberated from not just multiple written sources in various languages but simple household arts such as amphora - which, let's be clear, these weren't pretty pots that sat on pedestals, they were the Tupperware of the Hellenes and do we not prefer decorated Tupperware?- to mosaics, minted coins showing him in battle, proclaiming his divinity, and often enough bearing a mark of locality instead of a united empirical crest. Don't get me wrong, he was in my and many opinions the greatest, most effective General ever. From age 16, stewarding his father's throne, he proved that even with a small contingent, he could win the battle - in this case against the Meadi, a people of Thrace. He, in fact, never lost. Part of what made him effective, however, was knowing when to stay his hand. Allowing the chance, when he knew it best course, to grant him permission to walk right in an be given victory instead of wresting it from enemy hands. He had many battles but battles are just that, singular episodes. He won more land through the open palm than the closed fist. He won many battles with the closed fist, often ahead of his very weary troops - at least, the Macedonian ones. His constant struggle with his men from Macedon were some of his hardest battles and they were of the will. Especially when Persian forces rose through the ranks so swiftly. When one of his greatest advisors was a Persian eunuch, Bagoas. Especially when years grew closer to a decade, then surpassed. His territory was expansive and much of that is because smaller empires, early countries, places that can't be accused of being singular city states, bowed to him. Conquering the capital doesn't mean you've won the people, the lands and cities removed from the seat of power. It destabilizes, it fractures, but Alexander didn't need to fight ever city. That's what on earth possesses me to know that. Not believe. As I say to everyone who tries to quote history at me from lectures and textbooks, primary sources. No historian knows more than any other unless through knowledge of primary sources. Read opinions, retelling, summations, interpretations of historical accounts all you want. Bring the primaries as well and understand those better. They're what tells you the truth of history. And reveals the propagated lies. Also: this is almost all I studied as far as my history major went as I effectively triple majored as university for 7 years - 7 because I commuted from 50 miles away, and because the effective 3rd major was Teacher's Education, which is actually a certification rather than a major itself, we were told we had to treat it as such because it demanded more time than any other undergrad major. Literally, there are timesheets involved. But for history, I exclusively studied Antiquity. For much of English, I studied the ancients as well. So I've read Plutarch, Arrian, Aristotle, Plato, the Tragedians, Aristophanes - who incidentally created what I believe to be a historical lie propagated by lazy historians parroting a throw away line in a play without ever sourcing anything else - Herodotus, Thucydides, both Plenys, Sappho, letters from countless figures, the very everyday art itself - did you know there's special databases made for and by historians just to examine pieces that they have no physical proximity to? An online museum of sorts, or more accurately, catalog. It gives descriptions in the plainest form, dimensions, even transcription of letters or several possibilities of a glyph (from all known source languages) that is too broad and not in context (as well as dig site, original location, current location, intermediaries, full provinence basically, and those who unearthed it, restores it, etc). No analysis or thoughts, because it acts as an intermediary to real primary sources. A 1½st hand account, if you will. Alexander was one of my favorite figures to study prior to falling in love with Antiquity. Gaugamela was a huge victory. So was the liberation of Egypt, which was welcome, and the Oracle of Siwa, which lead to his (demi)deification. He did not besiege or attack in Egypt. He walked into the gates and was welcome first as the guest who promised to scare the bully (Persia) away. Then as a leader and god. He rebuilt temples, reorganized tax code, performed sacred rites of Egyptian culture to show his reverence. In return, he was basically pledged all of Egypt. He conquered more, territory wise, with oration, promises of self governance or renewal, and spirited philosophical discussions had with local leaders, than he did by putting a sword through flesh. He never lost a battle. He also didn't need to always battle.
@@johnirby8847 yes Philip created the League of Corinth, one of the numerous uses of the term Hellenic League. League of Corinth =/= the Hellenes. Important city states were not part of this League (Sparta comes to mind, Thessaly, Crete, large poleis that had no part of the League of Corinth but were very much part of the Hellenes). Alexander was able to bring in Thessaly, but, being neutral parties who didn't threaten his territory, he forwent battling Sparta and Crete. Also his controlling of revolts started long before he succeeded Philip. See: Thrace and the Maedi.
@palpablenotion I'm not saying what most of what you are saying isn't right, I'm saying that he was much more violent than you give him credit. And as far as conquering with words or gestures or anything else... Alexander used violence or the threat of violence in nearly every instance and those that failed to bend the knee would often times incur the worst forms of violence. Tyre comes to mind. The thousands crucified on the most popular road from Greece to Jerusalem is an example of using violence as a method of controlling dissent
Great thorough reaction! You might enjoy Dis Raps for Hire, made by one of the ERB rappers, EpicLLOYD. He solicits people's bully stories and writes a diss rap about said bully. He only did a few videos, but they're really entertaining!
I like how in-character everyone is in this erb.
Ivan's not here to be the best rapper, he's here to cheat with murder. Pompey doesn't get to participate. Alexander's high-speed verse laden with wordplay gives the impression that he's simply more talented at battle than the rest and he could probably keep going fore- oops he died.
Also you missed the bar that Frederick gave about paying a guy to tear out his eyes. That was a shot at the time Ivan tore out that one architects eyes after he built a cathedral for Ivan to prevent him from ever building anything as impressive again.
Alexander's bars are some of the best in all of ERB.
@@NotQuiteEpicZach Sherwin and NicePeter are the best on ERB
Asia is the correct description for the area Alexander conquered in his time. Asia wasn't referred to as Asia until recently. With Asia being the Middle East and India and the Orient being what we refer to as East Asia or Asia today.
Asia wasn't even Middle East, back then they used the word "Asia" strictly to describe modern-day Turkey.
I was about to make this comment, 'Asia' was the Greek name for Anatolia, Persia, exactly the territories Alexander conquered. He sent helmets back from his battles inscribed 'won from the barbarians who live in Asia', paraphrased. Why Asia refers to the far east China-dominated world in modern U.S parlance I don't know, but even in modern U.K an 'Asian' denotes someone like a Pakistani, not Chinese.
@@helvete_ingres4717 ...well that mostly has to do with the fact that China is, in fact, in Asia. Did you think China is not in Asia or something?
@@chingizzhylkybayev8575 historically in classical/hellenistic times, Asia refers to Persia, Anatolia, that part of the world. At some point it became the name of the continent (which geographically speaking, includes Europe - Europe is only a continent by convention, not by geography it's a big peninsula of Asia) which includes China, well done for pointing that out, we could all do with reminding
@@helvete_ingres4717 Not sure I would agree with the line about modern U.K. I can confirm that at least as an individual if someone says Asian my first thought is likely to be Indian/Pakistani, but I certainly include the Chinese, Koreans, Japanese etc etc within my concept of 'Asian'.
The horse story was put about by her enemies after her death. She was fairly promiscuous, but certainly no more than most kings of her age. People were just extra offended because she was a woman. Because Peter III didn't seem interested in consumating their marriage there's a good chance her heir wasn't fathered by him, but by one of her many lovers. She actually had someone who's job it was to inspect how well endowed potential lovers were.
On Frederick, the first time I watched this video I knew exactly who the referred to when they said "flute busting Prussian." He's always has been one of my favorites. There's some pretty good evidence that he preferred men, but of course we'll never know for sure.
I mean, his father killed his "best friend" because they tried to escape and become artists. Totally straight, nothing to see here, move along!
You could call her a… size queen
@@month32 They were roommates...
real question i got, did he steal Bucephalus and offer it to Catherine?
Since paige doesn’t really EXPLAIN what the horse story was, her enemies spread rumors that she died while “hoo-haahing” a horse, when i’m pretty sure she actually died of a stroke in the bath.
Catherine the Great actually died of a stroke. The "horse story" was circulated by British and French satirical newspapers and magazines some time later.
This was one of the best-crafted ERBs. Ivan was never supposed to "win", but kept winning due to really underhanded tactics, which is true to his character in real life.
13:23 this is a reference to Fredrick's best known technique, which he called the “oblique order,” he explained it as follows: a commander should strengthen one wing of his army and employ it to attack the enemy flank, while holding back another, smaller wing to threaten the enemy's main force and keep it from changing position. Basically, the stronger wing of the army would attack from a single flank while the weaker one would pose a threat of direct frontal attack (but not actually attack) with the goal of breaking the enemy on that flank and rolling up the enemy army.
It's both
I love how Catherine's garrote was noticeably different from Ivan's, but so few people ever mention it.
So MANY Easter eggs in this one. They really brought the research putting this together.
"I weep, it's all too easy" is probably a reference to the saying "Alexander wept, for he had no more worlds to conquer."
I have heard that the shot at 12:47 with Ivan's shadow looming in the background is taken from an early 20th-Century Russian film about Ivan.
The pose Fredrick strikes at the start on one foot with the flute is from a Jethro Tull album cover.
It is said that Ivan gouged out the eyes of the architect of St. Basil's Cathedral, so that the poor guy would never make anything as great again.
Look closely at the handles of the garrote Catherine used. She liked to use a certain... motif in decor to upset the more prudish Russians.
Great battle. One of my faves.
ERB gives me so many rabbit holes of history to dive into.
SAME
I love this one, I don't believe I didn't notice earlier that you didn't do it. One part you didn't mention that I find very interesting is Frederick's "I would pay a guy to tear out my eyes if I had to look at your troll face every night" which is a reference to a legend in which Ivan gouged the eyes of Postnik Yakovlev, the builder of Saint Basil's Cathedral , so that he can never build anything so beautiful again. I actually think I like Frederick's verse here the most, short but full of references and a great upbeat melody driving it.
Zach Sherwin is such a good rapper when it comes to wordplay. That's why Alexander's bars are pretty fire. His wordplay is really tough to top.
Aww you missed the Wizard of Oz reference by Frederick the Great: 'with your tundras and taigas and bears, oh my!' (lions, tigers and bears oh my)
When Alexander said the line with "Expansion Pack", that is a refference to the expansion pack for the game Rome Total War, named Alexander, bringing us the campaign for the game where you play as Alexander and conquer all of those lands
I'm not that into BBW, but Catherine's confidence always has me chomping at the bit every time I see this.
Peter III. was not only Tsar of Russia but also a duke or something in the northern part of Germany (Holstein) which he greatly preferred over being in Russia if I remember correctly and he spent a lot of time there also didn't want to be on the bad side with Prussia, while Catherine the Great was much more interested in making Russia a strong power in Europe or expanding the power. I like how everyone dies the way they died in history (or are supposed to) except for Catherine basically saying "nah that was just lies from the men who didn't like a powerful woman to do what they do" :D
Love these breakdowns, and how you skip back a few seconds after you commentary to make sure nothing is missed. Most reaction RUclipsrs do not do that, so I really appreciate it.
I've loved learning from your ERB reactions, glad you're so knowledgeable
I was really impressed with your knowledge of this stuff, then I got excited to see your reaction to the "saddle" line. Did not disappoint!
I'm obsessed- also, congratulations on hitting both goals I've seen on your videos! The last one I watched you had the road to 20K and you were already there! I love EBR, and hearing about these wordplay choices and themes from a historical context- well, I'm learning things! Thank you for such an awesome source of edutainment!
I really appreciate how they just made Ivan Terrible, nothing more than terrible. In the way he raps to the gifts he offers and especially the horse bit
Your excitement and energy when jumping onto the bits of knowledge and the references in the work is infectious :D very enjoyable to watch and happily subscribed
Bro I just discovered you and I really like your channel especially how you’re breaking down every bar with prior knowledge it’s very insightful and it makes me geek out
I have to say, of all the ESRB reaction videos, yours is the best. I was specifically looking for videos that break down the history facts of and you do it perfectly with rewinds, break down of lines and your personal interpretations of the bars based on history facts.
I think we're around the same age, but I wish you had been my history teacher back in high school lol. Your passion for the subject is infectious.
so glad to hear your impressions and explanations on this, my favorite ERB ever. keep up the great job Mr. Lboyd
I dunno bro, i'm with you, I thought you did this one allready as well 😆I hate it when we travel through world lines unnanounced.
I SWEAR I remember when Pompey popped up him going NO SIR, and saying something similar to "What do you have to offer but it was a more intense response... But Its not there...
The garrote handles in Cat's hands always make me laugh. Talk about reasons to never mix business and pleasure!
If you think about it, the thing with Alexander is correct. The quote specifically said, if you can UNTIE this not, you will be master of all of Asia. He didn't untie it, he destroyed it by cutting it in half and the mutiny prevented him from conquering all of Asia and he died shortly after.
Well, that is not what that verse meant. During the times of Alexander the Great, the name "Asia" was used differently to how it used today. Today, it refers to the largest geopolitical region in the world, but back then, the name "Asia" was how they referred to Turkey, strictly speaking. What we call "Asia" today was referred to as the Far East back then. As such, it is not inaccurate for Alexander to suggest he conquered Asia: the region that went by that name at that time was indeed conquered by him.
I am pretty sure you did all of them but I am happy to revisit this one, my favorite. Greetings from Iceland
That was fun listening to you dissect one of my favorite ERB episodes
Ivan is known for poisoning his enemies. I’ve heard a story that he had a special cup made that turned any liquid into poison (possibly made of hemlock). He would offer a drink from it to anyone who displeased him. The people knew of the cup but refusing the tsar was unthinkable, so they’d usually say goodbye to their loved ones first
Peter the Great is Peter the first her husband was Peter the third and Peter the third was Prussian and Catherine was Polish I believe
I love the breakdown and the energy you have
I genuinely enjoy this so much
Thank you
Love this and these in general, love your knowledge on these things. I catch a few bars that I understand but I love that you explain each reference
I usually see people who are so-called history buffs react to things and they barely even know very much or even react to things but you are very good at reacting to the video and very knowledgeable in the history
I think Alexander was calling Ivan's musical bars flavorless.
I believe the "Empress to Tsar 8, checkmate" is word-playing on to the likes of "Queen to C8, checkmate"
didn´t know, that you have that much knowledge about history. glad to learn from you sir. i would enjoy watching more history related breakdowns from you
Just stumbled upon this channel, totally love the content bro. The historic analysis is dope
So used to reacting to comedy and music with you, wasn't aware you had this birth of knowledge for history...which is some of my favorite stuff.
So basically.... * Tries to find the words to explain Stalion Copulation Death *
Gordion knot…something like the Excalibur legend for King Arthur. There was many legends on Alexander the Great and this is one.
I actually saw a show recently and THEY said the horse rumour was spread by a political rival of Catherine's AFTER her death to discredit her. Easy to spread such things when the person's not there to defend themselves.
Either im suffering from the Mandella effect or you did do this already. I remember it well enough to predict the things you were saying
I definitely remember you doing this one because you went into more detail about that taigas bar
Alexander had the best bars, but all he did was flex, with almost no disses. Catherine came through and toasted him.
the vodka line is referencing how one of the markers of good 'standard' vodka is a neutral flavor. There are traditional vodkas styles whose process intentionally adds flavor, but the standard type should generally go down with very little flavor or burn. Smooth, flavorless, and with nuances that come out in the aftertaste.
Didn't come across as shade toward vodka, since 'flavorless' is a compliment to vodka. Just a dig at Ivan's mic skills.
at 13:41 with Fredrick the Great playing flute and lifting his leg is a reference to Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull as he'd do that a lot on stage and prance around and stuff
Copulating with a stallion and the harness breaking loose is the best description I have heard of the story about Catherine. Well played, sir. Well played. 👍
That's kinda the thing, the "official" documentation describes she had a stroke on the toilet. But, that's just a little too far fetched considering who she was and the kind of power she held. My theory is that she was poisoned by people tired of a woman leading the country. They managed to convince the physician to say it was just a stroke so that they save face, and nobody would know because history is written by the survivors. She didn't likely die from a horse though. That's mostly from anti-Russian satire from England and France (who were getting scrubbed up and down by Russia during Catherine's reign).
I liked how much of the history you fleshed out in this video. I've seen a few of other historians covering this ERB. Although they explained those pretty well, I thought you did a kinda better job. A little disappointed you didn't catch some of the things in Frederick's verse, or his epic flute solo, but otherwise great vid.
I just like how you showed absolutely no surprise whatsoever when Pompey's head came off
10:18
I think there’s a funny setup with the birds to pots reference:
not only the helmet Alexander wears having feathers/the destruction of vases and monuments/art, (both historic/mythos related works depicting imagery of a person/legacy/fame),
but also the destruction of common household tradition at that time of leaving pots/pottery outside one’s house to attract birds which would then nest inside the household item. (Signifying someone had a nice home by having wild birds choosing it as a good nest sight/ liking the pots/pottery saying you have good items/ the ability to get free eggs/meat if times get rough.)
This line leads right into the next verse of destroying city’s/homes and I felt like it was a subtle nod to understanding myths/common practices of those eras both war myths and daily myths/life (and history of pottery uses) the warrior uses vs common people. while also referencing historical vases/works not only common peoples items (usually hand produced pottery or sculptures so breaking it was a rude gesture of vandalism/conquest)
Panhella love your ERB reactions and explanations. Keep it up!
How are you the head of our state, when the state of your head was such a crazy one. favorite line
I usually hate when people pause in reactions, i like more when people talk after they watch the whole thing. But this was awesome, amazing reaction !
I think the "Empiress to Tsar 8" part is a reference to chess where you would say "Rook to E4" or something similar
Ivan was also poisoning the cup before he gives it to Alexander, as he half turns away.
Ivan's daughter-in-law was dressed too lightly for the weather.
Wow, great breakdown. New sub here man!
There’s an ExtraHistory series on RUclips about Catherine the Great. It goes into her childhood and her life up to her death
Yes, the I Win Ivan I vanquish is absolutely a Veni Vidi Vici pull.
I'm really inspired by your broad level of historical knowledge.
Oblique attack tactics involves massing your troops on one flank to try to break through the enemy lines there and crush the enemy quickly. It can work well but it can also work terribly if the enemy breaks through the rest of your weakened battle line. Frederick was known for such tactics.
But he was also losing to Russia when the old empress died and Peter III took the throne. He returned all the Russian territorial gains to Frederick and made peace, alienating the army. It’s one of the main things that led to his coup
Yes, I loved these on late night TV. A history buff as well, I get the jokes. Smart comedy. May I add that i someday hope to live next door to someone like you. An analytical, funny, history buff who enjoys thinking, pondering. And likes lots of kinds of music. Family game night would be EPIC. Love you, and your channel!
Frederick's bar "I've got creative talents and battle malice" is a reference to him being one of the poster examples of the 'Enlightened Absolutism", in which monarchs would take over some ideas from the Enlightenment movement and have more eye for what the common people wanted or needed, but still staying in their positions as absolute monarchs. A saying from that time referencing that movement is "Everything *for* the people, nothing *by* the people".
You nailed it
I have never seen a reaction video done better than by you. I can't stand those people who react to videos and they just go like eh that was good or that was bad. You actually dissected the video and gave quality review of the entirety bit by bit. Thank you good sir.
Love your videos
ZACH SHERWIN AKA MC. MR NAPKINS aka Alexander is so 🔥
Another thing from the "little Vasilyvich" line I think is a reference that his grandfather, Ivan III Vasilyvich, was known as Ivan the Great, so Ivan the Terrible would be "little" in comparison or something like that.
I believe the line "Greek for the glory I got, for winning every single war that I fought."
Is a reference to the fact Alexander was ofcourse in fact not actually 'Greek' but Macedonian, but after his success and victories they basically adopted him as one of their own.
Tsar is actually just the Russian pronunciation of Caesar
Just as Kaiser being the German pronunciation of it.
Frederick's line referring to "tearing his own eyes out" relate to a story about Ivan the Terrible allegedly tearing out a famous architect's eyes after creating a beautiful structure over a Saint's grave. This was intended to prevent him from ever making anything more beuatiful than that. It was because he loved it so much, or something?
Fun fact: If you pause just after the Pompey decap, Cats garrot handles are phallus shaped, kind of tying to her being promiscuous.
I love the drop dead Fred reference lol.
Catherine the Great actually did die of a stroke, though she died at her desk. One of her ladies-in-waiting found her slumped on the floor surrounded by papers.
Bro his voice sounds like angels singing … this might help me get over my depression
I thought I knew a lot of this history. I was wrong, lol. Best ERB reaction ever! :D
Yeah, when I saw the thumbnail, my initial thought was "didn't he already do this one?"
You did react to this before I swore I saw your reaction to this a good minute ago xD
Frederick called himself the first servant of the state, because he did not see it as the state serving him but him serving his people.
Also, fun fact, prussia was called "not a state with a military but a military that happens to be a state"
the "Asia" in "Master of Asia" just refers to Asia Minor a.k.a. Anatolia because that's what it was in Ancient Greece
ayy my mans knows lithuania, thank you for noticing my country which nobody knows about, made my day
Love seeing you break this down. I came for the Bo Burnham reaction but I'll be watching all of these. Great content.
It’s funny to me that Ivan had a stroke while playing chess because I swear I have stroke every time I play chess.
i am sure i was subscribed..oh well I am now. love your reactions.
Frederick The Great, if I remember correctly, was also the first King of Prussia. He inherited the title of King in Prussia from his father and conquered enough territory to become King of Prussia. That might be the meaning of the phrase First Servant of State.
This was the best history lesson ever!
You sir are amazing , Loved the break down and explanation, yes mentioning how each of them actually died was on purpose
I can't believe that I'm watching guy react to ERB-- I haven't seen one of these since the early 2010s
100% agree she def took this one
It’s “I win, Ivan, I vanquish.” Ivan and “I vanquish” start with the same letters.
I love everyone has the same reaction to Pompey lmao
Alexander taming Bucephalus was a widely repeated story because Philip II had the best trainers and none could break the horse. Bu wasn't just wild, he was considered feral. Alexander approached him and understood that he was afraid and all these people trying to saddle him and whip him and all this ridiculousness... he was spooked by his shadow. It was one of the key moments in his diefication as son of Zeus. Philip II was terrified of Alexander at the end of his life.
He and Bucephalus were legendary, when Bu died, all the horses in the empire (well, capital) were to be shaved in mourning.
Alexander was amazing at joining peoples but he wasn't building a lasting empire, they followed him and his inner circle were serpents - that's why it's believed Hephaestus and then Alexander, in the resulting fit of depression, were poisoned, Alex most likely by his own medicine given to him to try and rouse him from his "sickness." Yea, serpents the lot of them.
Imagine what he could have done with 40, 60 years. Philip couldn't even conquer the Hellenes (the grouping of similarly cultured independent city states that we retroactively call Greece but was not united until Alexander campaigned in his father's war), meanwhile the Egyptians basically worshipped him when he arrived and went to the temple of Zeus Amon, declared son of... well, the Sun, basically. (Depending if we're talking Amon Ra or not).
He was the greatest conqueror in history, not because of an empire he built, but because most of his people willingly bent the knee, so to say. He conquered more through discussions and respect, through being viewed as a demigod, through charm and intelligence, than he did by the sword.
His tale is one of the most interesting tales when it comes to history's leaders because he didn't have ridiculous machinations behind his actions. He sought knowledge and culture, sharing ways to improve life and learning from his new subjects when they had better ways.
Arrian wrote hundreds of pages of a romance between Alexander and his peoples, his Patrocolus (because he also took on the helm of Achilles), his horse even, and the great comedy was strung together and then cut like that Gordian Knot, fraying into tragedy suddenly and completely.
"He conquered more through discussions and respect, through being viewed as a demigod, through charm and intelligence, than he did by the sword." No! No, he didn't! What on earth would possess you to believe that?!
Also, Phillip did create the Hellenic league. Alexander only put down revolts after his succession.
@@johnirby8847 having read the histories? The numerous accountings of his campaigns? The vivid descriptions of some battles, seemingly as far as historians can determine, cooberated from not just multiple written sources in various languages but simple household arts such as amphora - which, let's be clear, these weren't pretty pots that sat on pedestals, they were the Tupperware of the Hellenes and do we not prefer decorated Tupperware?- to mosaics, minted coins showing him in battle, proclaiming his divinity, and often enough bearing a mark of locality instead of a united empirical crest.
Don't get me wrong, he was in my and many opinions the greatest, most effective General ever. From age 16, stewarding his father's throne, he proved that even with a small contingent, he could win the battle - in this case against the Meadi, a people of Thrace. He, in fact, never lost.
Part of what made him effective, however, was knowing when to stay his hand. Allowing the chance, when he knew it best course, to grant him permission to walk right in an be given victory instead of wresting it from enemy hands. He had many battles but battles are just that, singular episodes. He won more land through the open palm than the closed fist.
He won many battles with the closed fist, often ahead of his very weary troops - at least, the Macedonian ones. His constant struggle with his men from Macedon were some of his hardest battles and they were of the will. Especially when Persian forces rose through the ranks so swiftly. When one of his greatest advisors was a Persian eunuch, Bagoas. Especially when years grew closer to a decade, then surpassed.
His territory was expansive and much of that is because smaller empires, early countries, places that can't be accused of being singular city states, bowed to him. Conquering the capital doesn't mean you've won the people, the lands and cities removed from the seat of power. It destabilizes, it fractures, but Alexander didn't need to fight ever city.
That's what on earth possesses me to know that. Not believe. As I say to everyone who tries to quote history at me from lectures and textbooks, primary sources. No historian knows more than any other unless through knowledge of primary sources. Read opinions, retelling, summations, interpretations of historical accounts all you want. Bring the primaries as well and understand those better. They're what tells you the truth of history. And reveals the propagated lies.
Also: this is almost all I studied as far as my history major went as I effectively triple majored as university for 7 years - 7 because I commuted from 50 miles away, and because the effective 3rd major was Teacher's Education, which is actually a certification rather than a major itself, we were told we had to treat it as such because it demanded more time than any other undergrad major. Literally, there are timesheets involved. But for history, I exclusively studied Antiquity. For much of English, I studied the ancients as well. So I've read Plutarch, Arrian, Aristotle, Plato, the Tragedians, Aristophanes - who incidentally created what I believe to be a historical lie propagated by lazy historians parroting a throw away line in a play without ever sourcing anything else - Herodotus, Thucydides, both Plenys, Sappho, letters from countless figures, the very everyday art itself - did you know there's special databases made for and by historians just to examine pieces that they have no physical proximity to? An online museum of sorts, or more accurately, catalog. It gives descriptions in the plainest form, dimensions, even transcription of letters or several possibilities of a glyph (from all known source languages) that is too broad and not in context (as well as dig site, original location, current location, intermediaries, full provinence basically, and those who unearthed it, restores it, etc). No analysis or thoughts, because it acts as an intermediary to real primary sources. A 1½st hand account, if you will.
Alexander was one of my favorite figures to study prior to falling in love with Antiquity. Gaugamela was a huge victory. So was the liberation of Egypt, which was welcome, and the Oracle of Siwa, which lead to his (demi)deification. He did not besiege or attack in Egypt. He walked into the gates and was welcome first as the guest who promised to scare the bully (Persia) away. Then as a leader and god. He rebuilt temples, reorganized tax code, performed sacred rites of Egyptian culture to show his reverence. In return, he was basically pledged all of Egypt.
He conquered more, territory wise, with oration, promises of self governance or renewal, and spirited philosophical discussions had with local leaders, than he did by putting a sword through flesh. He never lost a battle. He also didn't need to always battle.
@@johnirby8847 yes Philip created the League of Corinth, one of the numerous uses of the term Hellenic League. League of Corinth =/= the Hellenes. Important city states were not part of this League (Sparta comes to mind, Thessaly, Crete, large poleis that had no part of the League of Corinth but were very much part of the Hellenes). Alexander was able to bring in Thessaly, but, being neutral parties who didn't threaten his territory, he forwent battling Sparta and Crete.
Also his controlling of revolts started long before he succeeded Philip. See: Thrace and the Maedi.
@palpablenotion I'm not saying what most of what you are saying isn't right, I'm saying that he was much more violent than you give him credit. And as far as conquering with words or gestures or anything else... Alexander used violence or the threat of violence in nearly every instance and those that failed to bend the knee would often times incur the worst forms of violence. Tyre comes to mind. The thousands crucified on the most popular road from Greece to Jerusalem is an example of using violence as a method of controlling dissent
maskirovka has a double meaning in that it also means deception. such as offering him a drink that's poisoned.
I knew the broad strokes but there were a lot of details in this I didn't know about.
I feel like I remember watching this erb before on your channel.
Great thorough reaction! You might enjoy Dis Raps for Hire, made by one of the ERB rappers, EpicLLOYD. He solicits people's bully stories and writes a diss rap about said bully. He only did a few videos, but they're really entertaining!
16:34 was absolute gold
Hands down to Fredrik the Great for the best performance.