I was just going over the AAMC qpacks using your tips and can't thank you enough for sharing this AMAZING technique. Just had to pause my practice to comment this before I forget lol
You have just earned a sub from me. I am an URM and This was so helpful. I love how you went slow and explained everything. Thank you so much. I will try this technique. Wish me luck
It took me an hour to find a system but pretty much if the experimental group fulfills the condition (hypothesis) it is necessary to goal and necessary to the normal (whatever it is your testing under normal conditions). If experimental group doesn’t fulfill condition it’s not necessary to goal and not necessary to normal. Now you can determine ok if experimental group lowers whatever normal produces it inhibits it. If experimental group increases what normal produces it is driving it up and enhancing the goal and normal. These are logical paths for the big picture. After writing it out I’m seeing it. I feel like logical pathways in experiments are almost like lines of code. Certain experiments call for different schemas or strings of logical code to reach the goal or see what experimenters are thinking or testing. I think students who struggle should develop like a schema to enhance this because flow of logic and info is hard.
How do we ensure there is no 'contaminant' from one well to the others ?. Is it a necessary to control the integrity or quality of each well in the gel ?
![Wolfram Physics Project: Working Session Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2020 [Empirical Physical Metamathematics]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VlqerIL2kl8/mqdefault.jpg)
![Wolfram Physics Project: Working Session Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2020 [Empirical Physical Metamathematics]](/img/tr.png)
I was just going over the AAMC qpacks using your tips and can't thank you enough for sharing this AMAZING technique. Just had to pause my practice to comment this before I forget lol
The examples you gave for positive controls at 42:12 were extremely helpful. Thank you so much!
You have just earned a sub from me. I am an URM and This was so helpful. I love how you went slow and explained everything. Thank you so much. I will try this technique. Wish me luck
It took me an hour to find a system but pretty much if the experimental group fulfills the condition (hypothesis) it is necessary to goal and necessary to the normal (whatever it is your testing under normal conditions). If experimental group doesn’t fulfill condition it’s not necessary to goal and not necessary to normal. Now you can determine ok if experimental group lowers whatever normal produces it inhibits it. If experimental group increases what normal produces it is driving it up and enhancing the goal and normal. These are logical paths for the big picture. After writing it out I’m seeing it. I feel like logical pathways in experiments are almost like lines of code. Certain experiments call for different schemas or strings of logical code to reach the goal or see what experimenters are thinking or testing. I think students who struggle should develop like a schema to enhance this because flow of logic and info is hard.
This is great! Do you guys have any other content that is focused on understanding research based passages? Thanks!
Please screen is blurry and I can not see words .make sure to use high resolution camera
How do we ensure there is no 'contaminant' from one well to the others ?. Is it a necessary to control the integrity or quality of each well in the gel ?
6:16 Classic Accuracy vs. Precision diagram