Thank you for watching, and pointing out our errors. You are correct, indeed. We have used the term "princess" somewhat loosely, in the same manner it would be used in modern sense, to mean a daughter (or direct descendent) of a king. But as you point out, there is a distinction between a "princess" and an "infanta" of Spain. We will make those distinctions clear in the future videos. We appreciate your corrections, and will try to make sure we address your comments to improve our future videos.
Thank you! We view every correction as an opportunity to improve, since, after all, we are but a couple of students of history and armatures in video making who find these stories interesting. Hope you enjoyed our videos!!
@@HistoryofArt-365 Um... an armature is a framework, or a mechanical part of an electromagnetic device. I think what you mean is _amateurs,_ meaning non-professionals. Reading through the comments leads me to believe y'all are less than particular about word meanings. Listening to your vid strongly indicates a lack of grammar skills. This is part of what's keeping y'all amateurs instead of pros. Hire an editor. Do it fast. Get one who knows at least a bit about art history. You have a lot of good things to say, but you're saying them downright sloppily. There's zero excuse for it. Don't depend on Grammarly or any AI editing. _Hire a genuine human. The woods are full of good writer/editors. Locate one._
She definitely did cross dress, and had some women falling over for her, as I understand. We are planning a stand-alone episode on her, so please check back in!
You can have "converted to *the Catholic Faith* or *converted to Catholicism* You cannot have "converted to catholic" because that's just an adjective and the sentence makes no sense. (You could have said "converted to become *a* Catholic" though )
Thanks for the comment. After some follow up research, we concluded the opening portrait is of Louis XIV, by Juste d'Egmont (Justus van Egmont). There are indeed portraits of Louis XV wearing similar coronation robes and in similar sitting pose. If you still think the portrait was of Louis XV, please let us know of the details. Thank you for watching!
Really interesting! However, the right word for them is Parliamentarians. Parliamentalist is a soundcloud rapper from 2013 😅
Thank you for watching, and also for your patience with our mistakes. We will try to do better!
10:29 Maria T(h)ersa was an (Infanta* of Spain. Not a ''Princess''.
Thank you for watching, and pointing out our errors. You are correct, indeed. We have used the term "princess" somewhat loosely, in the same manner it would be used in modern sense, to mean a daughter (or direct descendent) of a king. But as you point out, there is a distinction between a "princess" and an "infanta" of Spain. We will make those distinctions clear in the future videos. We appreciate your corrections, and will try to make sure we address your comments to improve our future videos.
@@HistoryofArt-365 I admire how you accept correction and criticism. To me, it's one of the marks of a genuine scholar.
Thank you! We view every correction as an opportunity to improve, since, after all, we are but a couple of students of history and armatures in video making who find these stories interesting. Hope you enjoyed our videos!!
@@HistoryofArt-365 Um... an armature is a framework, or a mechanical part of an electromagnetic device. I think what you mean is _amateurs,_ meaning non-professionals. Reading through the comments leads me to believe y'all are less than particular about word meanings. Listening to your vid strongly indicates a lack of grammar skills. This is part of what's keeping y'all amateurs instead of pros.
Hire an editor. Do it fast. Get one who knows at least a bit about art history. You have a lot of good things to say, but you're saying them downright sloppily. There's zero excuse for it. Don't depend on Grammarly or any AI editing. _Hire a genuine human. The woods are full of good writer/editors. Locate one._
😂😂😂😂 that wasn't a good match HE WAS A HOMOSEXUAL 😂😂😂😂
Thanks for watching and commenting! We will continue with the story of this marriage in the next video.
True. I couldn't be married to a gay man.
@@jamellfoster6029 Unless you're a gay man, too. But I gather you're a woman, as am I, and I agree with you completely.
i just love your work!!!
great job as always!!!
Thank you for your kind words! We will try our best to bring you more interesting stories!
Did you know Philippe had a crush , maybe more than that, on Hortense Mancini?
That’s interesting! Hortense Mancini definitely lived a very interesting life. Thanks for watching!
@@HistoryofArt-365 Didn't she cross dress & have bisexual affairs?
She definitely did cross dress, and had some women falling over for her, as I understand. We are planning a stand-alone episode on her, so please check back in!
Married at 9?
Yes… unbelievable, but true. Her husband was also just about 15 at the time of their marriage. Thank you for watching!
You can have "converted to *the Catholic Faith* or *converted to Catholicism*
You cannot have "converted to catholic" because that's just an adjective and the sentence makes no sense.
(You could have said "converted to become *a* Catholic" though )
Thanks for the comment. We will try to be more careful with these details!
@@HistoryofArt-365 Thanks for taking my comment in the positive encouraging light in which it was intended :)
@@HistoryofArt-365 The opening portrait is Louis XV, not Louis XIV.
Thanks for the comment. After some follow up research, we concluded the opening portrait is of Louis XIV, by Juste d'Egmont (Justus van Egmont). There are indeed portraits of Louis XV wearing similar coronation robes and in similar sitting pose. If you still think the portrait was of Louis XV, please let us know of the details. Thank you for watching!
@@HistoryofArt-365
Sorry for the mistaken correction....It may well be Louis XIV as you attribution.
Excellent channel!
Bon Chance.