Haya Glamazon right!!! How the flip do people feel even remotely bad for this girl. She could’ve definitely avoided all of it if she didn’t jump at the idea of a rich friend. 🤦🏽♂️
I have had friendships that moved just as fast. Not in the same direction, but still very fast. Manipulative people can form a bond of trust very quickly.
One thing that is extremely annoying about this whole thing is how people keep bringing up that Anna isn’t German, she’s “Russian”. Like, she was born in Russia but her passport is legitimately German. She’s not pretending to be a *German* heiress she’s pretending to be an heiress. She really is German.
Well that might be correct, personally when somebody's asking me where I'm from I'm answering Romania, even i left there when I was 9, even if I have 2 different id's, based on the fact that I was born there and both my father and mother are from there and that's the first language that I learned, I can see why people feel the need to argue that she's not German and its not really wrong either it's kinda of a blurry line, but at least we know for sure that she's not a heiress😂
@@MsTinkerbelle87 That’s called stereotyping…. You can’t decide that you have the power to tell somebody where they’re from just because of how they sound. That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.
Yeah i think people will always refer to you based on your origin, not your Citizenship, which i think is also unfair and in her family's context, is quite xenophobic. I think the Netflix show addressed that also when uncovering Anna's family background in Germany. How she and her family was never really considered "German" in the German society because they are Russian immigrants.
But if she was born in Russia, then she is Russian. She may have acquired German citizenship, but i don’t see what’s wrong with her being Russian, it’s nothing to be ashamed of, surely?
Here’s the thing, I see so many people on here attacking Rachel but what if you were in her situation? You had a friend who invited you on a trip overseas and said that you don’t need to pay for anything. Perhaps you even insisted on paying for your own expenses but your friend said that they wouldn’t take your money. Then they proceed to scam you into paying for the whole thing. How would you feel? It’s like someone inviting you to dinner and then scams you into paying for the whole meal rather than just what you ate and they ordered the most expensive thing on the menu. Was Rachel silly and trusting? Yes. Did she deserve what happened to her? Absolutely not. Anna is a sociopath.
Jack Timothy great for her.. and she’s going to latch on to her 15 minutes of fame to reveal secrets about the fake heiress... the fake heiress is clearly the person who people wanna know about not this woman. This woman just happened to be close friends with the female Frank Abagnale.
what you should ask is how did the world get so shallow and all about appearances for her to be able to lead on that many people as for that Rachel she was a parasite who just wanted to take advantage of anything she could get until it backfired
I know people are being rude to her but honestly Anna is lowkey crazy and it’s not as if Rachael did not pay for stuff or try Anna insisted on paying and buying her stuff it was part of her show she had to seem Rich .
It's weird how people are dragging Williams for reporting Anna Delvey. Accepting someone's unsolicited offers to buy you things does not entitle that person to scam you and it doesn't absolve any conning. So whether or not Williams was "opportunistic" is irrelevant as she had every right to report and write about what happened without question. Zola did it lol However you choose to see it, Delvey is still a con artist.
Even though Rachel was gullible, she didn't deserve to be robbed of her money. Hopefully, nothing Anna ever does will prosper and she will be forgotten about which is basically the worst thing that could happen to a narcissist.
@@eireenlustre9497 and she's already lost 2/3 of that money to pay restitution. She probably lost more with all the spending she did between her release from prison and her deportation proceedings.
@@eireenlustre9497 actually that was produced by shonda rhimes and was based off the article by Jessica Priestley Anna had nothing to do with that series and actually the money from that will be going to a victim's fund
@@satyendrandonibanerjee8682 Anna was paid 320,000 dollars by Netflix for that show. She spent around 200,000 restitution for the banks and 25,000 on state fines, with 95,000 dollars left.
The actress Katie Lowes did an amazing job emulating the insincerity and faux innocence Rachel exudes. I can see it here, Rachel really took from Anna despite Anna taking from Rachel. She thought she got a friend who had $$$ and enjoyed the ride.
You make no sense. Anna offered to pay for everything that Rachel was along with and never asked for repayment. Anna LIED to Rachel about paying her back. If Anna had been honest and said Rachel had to pay her own way then Rachel would have not gone. Anna lied about being able to afford the trip and continued lying after the trip.
Why is everyone here so eager to demonize Rachel... I think we all see a bit of ourselves in her and are quick to disavow it. I personally have gone on a vacation that was mostly paid for by a friend, and I can tell you it's hard to say no to... and why, if the other person can afford it?
@@eemoogee160 nada, but she didn't investigate like she should have. I have wealthy friends in NYC and had 'RICH' friends in LA...very different and easy to distinguish between them. All you have to do is know and investigate them to ensure.
@@evanh9301 Oh I know and the worst part is she has been reimbursed by her credit card company already so she’s just milking it..you’d think she played a major part in Anna’s story but no 😂😂
…allegedly. If you're getting your info from 'Inventing Anna' then keep in mind that Netflix's primary motivation with the series was to entertain rather than inform, and several people directly connected with the Sorokin case have contradicted Rachel's portrayal in the show. A cynic might also point out that Rachel sold her story to HBO rather than Netflix so the latter might have an axe to grind! At the very least let's agree that Hollywood has a terrible reputation when it comes to historical accuracy.
Your thought process doesn't match your username. Rachel didn't ask to hang out with Anna. Anna was clinging to her like she did with Neff. The only difference is that Anna paid back the $200 bill she stuck Neff with and didnt pay the $65,000 bill she stuck Rachel with.
@@hunter98764 I was thinking the same thing not until I watched an interview of the real Kacy, the other friend and she's claiming the portrayal of Rachel is true. So the netflix rep is true to the actual people involved. It's not right what Anna did to Rachel, but we can't also deny that she was a social climber at some point.
@@misschelle23 to an extent she was a social climber (as was everyone in that friendship group and indeed the wider New York social scene), though Netflix dialled that up to 11 and did a hitjob on her. For example the show portrays Rachel as getting repaid by Amex before the trial and suggests she's out to greedily profit and get unnecessary revenge on Anna. In actuality the debt was forgiven months after the trial ended. It's obvious that they wanted to cast Anna in a semi-positive light and therefore needed a semi-villain in the form of Rachel. I'm also disgusted at how Anna is using the show to launch a career and Netflix seems to be aiding her in that. Why does America worship con artists so much?
Close friends for two months? I've had blisters last longer than this 😂 We need to make it to the year mark and pass my scrutiny and checks before I consider anyone a true friend
I can’t stand this woman Rachel playing the victim. She isn’t that innocent and has herself to blame. Not only the credit card comp ended up not charging her most of the money, she also is making the money from the book she wrote about this.
Wait! Were they only friends for 2 months? The whole time I thought they had been friends for at least 2 yrs! One of my best friends and I were best friends for a whole yr and the only thing I ever bought her was a candy bar. I was an unemployed teenager though.
In her Vanity Fair article that Rachel wrote, she said they were friends since January 2016 and then the Morocco trip was in May 2017... So I guess maybe math isn't her strong suit?? 😆
You weren't her friend. You were a friend of her money. And what she could buy you. It was a poetic justice using your credit cards for the Morocco vacation. I don't feel sorry for you.
exactly. I have friends who are like this. Mixture of opportunist, scrub and toxic. There for the ride cos i got the money. Its sad and pity. I don't feel sorry for her either.
"Rachel picked up the bill." Actually, she didn't. She committed credit card fraud after her own card was declined (so she definitely had no intention of pitching in for so much as a round of drinks on the trip). The only reason she's not sharing a cell with Anna right now is that she basically worked off her debt to Vanity Fair by selling them her exclusive story.
@@user-kb8qw7dy4t Really? Rachel does mention "her" Vanity Fair corporate card in her book, but all the while she claims that several ten thousand dollars were charged to her (rather than Vanity Fair) in connection with her trip to Morocco
So you were using her when you were believing she was an heiress? You enjoyed all those perks huh? And the user got used and got mad? What crime did she commit when you GAVE them your credit card WILLINGLY
Just because she got the money back and more, doesn’t remove the trauma of the situation. We make mistakes and we hate ourselves for it, but we shouldn’t take responsibility for being a victim.
Yes but she also profited heavily of the trauma. If she had just gotten her money back then it would’ve been fine because she didn’t deserve to be 62k in debt. But she made half a million dollars off that story selling it to the highest bidder and still got her money back…..not to mention all the stuff Anna payed for her before…..
But we're cool when Neff and Kaci does the same thing??? Did you forget how Neff was ready to sever her relationship with her when she didnt pay that hotel bill, which threatened her job and made her go into her film fund to pay for dinner?? Was Rachel the best kinda of friend not in the least. did she deserve to have what happened to her? No way.
@@rhey81 Oh. And what about deserting your 'friend', making a bee line for the exit at the very first opportunity, forgetting about the countless occasions when this 'sweet pea' was enjoying those lavish parties, dinners and getaways at the expense of Sorokin? Never thought of questioning where all that money came from as long as she wasn't the one paying the bills but enjoying all the benefits. Yea, this girl must be a real angel. Very selfless to have 'offered' to pay this one time and took the first chance to make an exit to save her dear life. Sorry to burst your bubble, but to me she's as fake as botox. Having said that, I'm not glorifying what Sorokin did at all. But this girl, I've seen her kind. They are snakes. Will turn on you the minute you're of no use to them.
@@rhey81 The difference is Rachel is the one who set her up and the one milking this for hundreds of thousands with a book deal, interviews, and selling her story. The other two have been just living their lives.
I don’t get why people are so mean to this girl. If someone offered me a paid vacation and insisted on all of it I’m pretty sure 99% of you guys would do it and she probably did lend the money because what else would happen she go to jail !!! And Anna got so many people convinced she had money and you could trust her !
Ito din po first thought ko kaso nung niyaya kasi siya ni anna sabi niya wala siya pera tapos nung talbog pala tsike napahiram niya kaya nagmukha siya tuloy mang gagamit
People like you think 99 percent would accept such thing… sigh.. She was fine with her friend paying for the whole thing, but she can’t pay even for herself.. if you can’t afford sth you simply don’t do it and try to improve your life by attaching yourself to rich people. Looks like this is best thing happened to this ordinary girl. She even took her money back thanks to AmEX
@@nh7568 but Anna was the one who suggested the most expensive room in the most expensive villa and offered to pay for all of it so all her friends went along to just enjoy the trip if rachel wanted to pay for herself she would’ve gone with a cheaper room and paid for her self
@@himanshisobti6937 well she should have said no and stayed in a cheaper room by herself then. She doesn’t even offer to pay a portion of the bill herself. Neff (the girl who works at the hotel) was also invited to the trip but she chose not to go thinking it’s not appropriate to accept such gift and things usually don’t come for free.
Why is everyone blaming her and worshiping Anna? Am I missing something? For a billionaire inviting friends to trips would barely cost anything, and considering Anna literally offered to, how was that Rachel's fault...? I dont understand the thought process of so many people in here...
The fact that people are so hateful so Rachel when she really is a victim is baffling to me. Anna is a scammer con artist who literally convinced top banks and loan company’s that she was legit, he mad at Anna for scamming so many people out of so much money. What Anna did is NOT okay and I’m tired of people glamorizing her.
@@missl849 that wasn’t a true documentary. But they played up Anna’s sociopath side. The movie just plays into that and does it well. If you left the movie feeling like you like Anna, then her spell worked. 🙂
I was supportive of Rachel until I listened to her book. Unfortunately, she makes it hard to like her. Rachel makes herself sound greedy and native. She cares so much about clout. Her book is full of that, and it's boring to listen to.
I don't understand how people can sympathise with her either though.... She let her rich friend buy so many things for her, probably amounting to a lot more than the $62K she shouted. How is she a victim for paying for her fair share?
You are an opportunist too. A decent person doesn't accept others to lavish them with trips. You say "no thank you, I will pay for my own hotel and we can meet during the day". You lent her your credit card BC you felt in debt for accepting her free lunches/dinners.
Not judging cuz I wasn't involved in the whole situation, however I just don't think I would EVER be comfortable with a new friend of only TWO MONTHS asking me to even go on an out of country vacation with. 🤔
The thing is that Rachel actually used Anna for “her money”; she took and took and how am I supposed to feel bad for her because she went to Morocco and expected to have a trip of luxury and not pay a single dollar because she living off of someone else? I’m sorry but no.
@@euwandelatorre467 well would you rather go to jail and be stuck in a foreign country bc your friend couldn't pay? Or pay using your company card and risk losing your job?....there wasn't much of an option.
Let me ask you -- would you let someone you hardly know-pay for your food, cloth, vacations etc-- for years ???? And than go and sell your fony story for over-600000 usd-- and still pretened you are "innocent" ??? AnnA-IS A SCAMER , BUT RACHEL- IS A SNKE, I WOULD NEVER WANT " A FRIEND LIKE HER- WOULD YOU ?? RACHEL IS SO FONY SO GREEDY THAT SHE GIVES ANNA LESSONES
Lol exactly. People are harsher on the victim than the ACTUAL criminal. Like Anna would love to hear you all say that’s me then she cry to you about how annoying Rachel is and use you too.
The victim blaming of rachel is the most telling thing about this whole episode. Oh, and neffs enabling of a criminal and exceptionally problematic behaviour in general....
Yeah it’s not free loading when you literally lie and steal money under false pretences. Not saying Rachel is a great person or anything but Anna completely scammed her out of that money. Do it to large faceless banks is one thing but doing it to individuals which can legitimately ruin their lives is just evil.
@@jodypaul1950 it is freeloading. What u’re saying is ‘scamming’. Rachel tried to freeload from her ‘rich’ friend believing she’s worth all that special treatment not expecting to pay back. Anna scams bc from the beginning, she lies to steal ‘Evil’ it was. But the movie portrayed Anna’s justification really well. She was outcasted by her high school friends whose superficiality turned Anna to a victim of bully. Later she projected her revenge on all the superficial ‘teenagers’ she met while in NY
@@metaphor5774 also the Netflix series is a terrible source of information and perspective. It’s main purported is entertainment and character redemption lol so don’t put any stock into it.
@@angelica8000 They needed a scape goat to make Anna look better in the show and decided to just throw Rachel under the bus, pure deceit and just overall nasty work by Netflix
Everyone is sh*tying on Rachel calling her an opportunist but wasn’t Anna doing the exact same thing to other people in her life?? But WORSE owing way more £££ Rachel was scammed regardless if she was fake friends with Anna that’s not the point
My silence is probably stronger than my words.” Wait... What? Court appearances, network television interviews, and a book... this chick has been anything but silent.
One thing I never understood was how Rachel accumulated all this excess debt and loans from friends if American Express forgave the charges. It seems to me that she was living paycheck to paycheck as was. I don’t think she could have even gone on the trip at all if Anna had not offered to pay for it. What Anna did was wrong, but anyone who thinks Rachel was not a bit of a user herself is kidding themselves. Just my opinion!
Clearly you know nothing about the situation, the audacity to do zero research and self-righteously share your blatantly incorrect opinion is pretty embarrassing. Are you naive enough to think that Amex of all companies would complete a fraud investigation overnight and send the money back the next day?
I disagree. I followed this case from the start and I sincerely believe Anna was just waiting for her Fortress loan to be funded (and was being string along by them for several weeks after first being told she was approved, before backtracking and needing to do more "due diligence"). I believe Anna would have paid all her currently outstanding debts in full had that funding come through as our finally promised. Yet she clearly knew she didn't have the money for the Morocco trip up front, but she was in a bind with needing to leave her current hotel and get her travel passport/visa stamped elsewhere, but she was being told her loan was approved and would be funded any day now, so she likely didn't see any harm in having Rachel cover expenses in the short term. That said, I don't think she feels bad about what she did to Rachel AT ALL...and she would have covered her debts if funded - NOT because it was the right thing to do - but rather because she didn't want anyone to ever think she couldn't pay, or that she was poor. She would rather be seen as careless or ditzy, and so was okay with making excuses and playing that part because it would be better to be ditzy than poor/struggling.
I mean tbh, it would probably happen to me by accident if someone was faking being rich and famous. She didn’t deserve to be robbed for that money regardless if they were friends at the time
She is the one expecting Anna to pay for everything all those 2 months. Something went wrong in Morocco and shes hesitant to foot the bill for Anna. She obviously befriended her for money. She is bever willing to spend for the “supposed” friendship. And now she is using Anna and kept on using her to earn more money. What Anna owed her has already been paid. She is a user and she should learn to keep her mouth shut.
The thing though is that I have no remorse for her.. she got what was owed to her through Amex and through other methods. Now, going back to that time in their “friendship”… Rachel just comes out looking like a freeloader. Who constantly accepts so many gifts and even a free vacation? Who’s actually comfortable with their friend doing that, even if they’re doing better than you? It just shows that she was going along with the ride and eventually it caught up with her
But as it stands, Anna was counting on Rachel’s follower personality for her ruse. She needed a devoted fan and supporter. She’s the one who didn’t want to work for a living. She’s the actual predator. How are you overlooking the sociopath in all of this? If you do, the sociopath has worked you over successfully.
If Anna were Rachel, she would’ve done the same thing. A lot of you are victim blaming it’s crazy. When an opportunity is offered, who wouldn’t accept it? It’s not like other friends paid for anything either. Rachel was just the only one scammed hard and that did something about it.
Its terrible that the jury didn't ensure that Anna pay Rachel back by convicting Anna of that theft. Conning is a crime. Rachel didn't hand over her card to pay, but as a hold. Anna agreed to pay, then ditched her. Rachel lost her savings and couldn't afford rent. As a therapist, I can truly say Anna meets criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder (sociopath). Anyone who defends Anna and blames Rachel is falling into the same trap everyone else has who fell for Anna's conning charm.
Why didn’t they just split ?! There were I think 4 people so divided by 4. I don’t want to make excuses for Anna but why should she potentially reimburse the expenses of all? Rachel was also there and she can pay her part of the holiday if something goes downhill
I agree with the jury. True it is that Anna’s behavior was horrible. I cannot believe someone would scam a person with no money without ever crossing their mind their are literally ruining someone life. However, Rachel was not forced or threatened. She was an adult, and should have thought twice about leaving the country with no money or back up plan. At what point does it start crossing your mind that gifts, that expensive and that often, require reciprocation. She herself walked into the wolf’s mouth.
So funny how people in comment section were also conned by Anna. 😂 Obviously, Rachel is a victim and she never asked to be treated to trips. Anna lure and insisted to pay for everything at the start. Rachel handed the card only as a hold for Morroco but there was a clear understanding between her and Anna that Anna will pay her back. So it doesn't really matter if Anna spends for her Rachel at the start, what matters is Anna didn't pay her back as she promised she will, and kept on dragging the issue even copying fictitious people in her email.
And? If I had a rich friend that offered to take me somewhere and pay for everything I’d go without hesitation. If that vacation to them is like a cheeseburger to me then what’s the issue?
@@mkharris08 I know. But I'd still want to like that person. The problem here is that Rachel did not like Anna, she just tagged along with her because she wanted to be pampered.
Some people complain about Rachel being a mooch, other people complain about her paying for Anna! I hope none of y'all have ever made a mistake in your lives because the victim blaming and lack of empathy is unreal.
For all the people who are blaming Rachel, is she bad just for accepting a luxurious trip from a new rich "friend"? Definitely not the best idea but she was not trying to scam someone. I often offer things I can afford to my close friends. They did the same when they first got job. It is not a crime to accept it.
Not blaming her but I personally don't like how she portays herself as a victim. She was happy that her friend was paying for everything prior to this incident. Az you were saying you are happy to pay for your friends and when your friends were able they would pay for you. Anna was indeed a sociooath because we know now the whole story, but based on Rachelle's story, Anna has just been a horrible friend. And I wonder also if all the things that Anna paid for her before and during this trip are equivalent to the 62k
No lol but just as a life lesson: it says a lot that she didn’t just go leave the hotel - one of the most expensive and exclusive hotels in the world - immediately (rather she put down her own credit card so she could continue living a lavish “Instagram worthy” lifestyle)
They're both wrong but I don't blame Rachel for providing info to the police. She didn't do it to sell a story but only to get the money that Anna said she can and will pay back. Then the ultimate universe KARMA.
This happens because, she saw her wearing designer clothing, automatically assume that she has money, and voula. I bet that if was me with my own no designer cloth, she would never look at my way.
Oh come on, she was having expensive dinners and spa treatments and went shopping many times on Annas account for TWO YEARS. Is that how honest friendship works in the first place??
i mean 62000, that rachel's bank forgave. she got to enjoy countless dinners, sauna, training sesh and connections and trips from anna. so if anything rachel was just simply paying anna back for all the things rachel enjoyed for "free". and all of a sudden rachel was demanding money back from anna for the morocco trip? GIRL U LITERALLY DIDNT PAY FOR A THING BEFORE THAT.
Yes, at least in the end Anna was honest about having no remorse. She was an honest phoney. Now if only politicians and other authority figures would be as honest about their phoniness.
It was fine for her to go on trips with her as long as Anna is paying but when it was time for her to pay, that's where she draws the line hahahah loool
Why should actually Anna reimburse her everything? Why didn’t they just split everything and everybody had to pay for their part? It’s not like as if she was not there and enjoying
So weird! These days you don‘t ‚go to‘ or ‚talk to‘ your bank in order to transfer money. And you don’t do Morocco without a single penny in your pocket. So it should‘ve been pretty obvious from early on that there‘s nothing to be had.
plus the fact that every card she tried to use anywhere straight up did not work, she says that she never told anyone she was wealthy and everyone around just thought she was. she put bills off by saying there would be a wire transfer, she would tip every hotel employee with 100s. Looks like the money was just blinding everyone. no one questioned it at all because it was just beneficial to them.
Now she is suing Netflix for defamation. She put herself out there to make money. Now she cant handle how others opinions of her aren't as a victim. She was never the victim just a opportunist. They both deserved prison.
Girl you have been paid more than 62,000. Anna might not pay you that money herself but you exploding her name, making a book using her name without her consent - you are banking and doing exactly what she was doing but being more political.
*tears* I kept using my friend for free drinks and meals and then expected them to pay for a luxurious all expenses paid trip and then got stuck with the bill for probably less than what she's been spending on me the past few months of knowing her. Then all my debt got forgiven and I got a book deal. Woe is me.
This girl was immediately reimbursed by Amex for the charge to her card… and then she proceeded to make boatloads of money with a book deal and loads of paid press crying about being a victim. This girl is as fake as it gets.
Lol you were friends with her for 2 months yet accepted her paying for trips, dinners and a luxury trip to Morocco?? What ? Girl bye 😂
Haya Glamazon right!!! How the flip do people feel even remotely bad for this girl. She could’ve definitely avoided all of it if she didn’t jump at the idea of a rich friend. 🤦🏽♂️
@@cheeto8544 Right 😂😂 She wanted an easy ride
I have had friendships that moved just as fast. Not in the same direction, but still very fast. Manipulative people can form a bond of trust very quickly.
she's the only "friend" that I've seen out here talking all about Anna Delvey, and also ON MULTIPLE OUTLETS LOL
I mean, wouldn't you? I would
One thing that is extremely annoying about this whole thing is how people keep bringing up that Anna isn’t German, she’s “Russian”. Like, she was born in Russia but her passport is legitimately German. She’s not pretending to be a *German* heiress she’s pretending to be an heiress. She really is German.
Well that might be correct, personally when somebody's asking me where I'm from I'm answering Romania, even i left there when I was 9, even if I have 2 different id's, based on the fact that I was born there and both my father and mother are from there and that's the first language that I learned, I can see why people feel the need to argue that she's not German and its not really wrong either it's kinda of a blurry line, but at least we know for sure that she's not a heiress😂
But she sounds Russian…
@@MsTinkerbelle87 That’s called stereotyping…. You can’t decide that you have the power to tell somebody where they’re from just because of how they sound. That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.
Yeah i think people will always refer to you based on your origin, not your Citizenship, which i think is also unfair and in her family's context, is quite xenophobic. I think the Netflix show addressed that also when uncovering Anna's family background in Germany. How she and her family was never really considered "German" in the German society because they are Russian immigrants.
But if she was born in Russia, then she is Russian. She may have acquired German citizenship, but i don’t see what’s wrong with her being Russian, it’s nothing to be ashamed of, surely?
Here’s the thing, I see so many people on here attacking Rachel but what if you were in her situation? You had a friend who invited you on a trip overseas and said that you don’t need to pay for anything. Perhaps you even insisted on paying for your own expenses but your friend said that they wouldn’t take your money. Then they proceed to scam you into paying for the whole thing. How would you feel? It’s like someone inviting you to dinner and then scams you into paying for the whole meal rather than just what you ate and they ordered the most expensive thing on the menu. Was Rachel silly and trusting? Yes. Did she deserve what happened to her? Absolutely not.
Anna is a sociopath.
They were friends for 2 months… give me a break. Both of them are sociopaths.
Notice how the other two friends didn’t offer up their cards for anything 😭
Exactly! If they had been the ones betrayed they would have a different side to the story.
@@daisyb4614 stop victim.blaming
There's absolutely no way I could ever find myself in this situation. I'm not nearly rich enough nor dumb enough.
How long is she going to keep milking this story? 😐
Until she turns this into a reality TV show 😆😆
Javannah Melissa until she gets that $60,000 back
@@christinayates2496
She got more than half million dollar
Jack Timothy great for her.. and she’s going to latch on to her 15 minutes of fame to reveal secrets about the fake heiress... the fake heiress is clearly the person who people wanna know about not this woman. This woman just happened to be close friends with the female Frank Abagnale.
Until it gets played out very quickly and forgotten!!!
the fact that so many of yall are literally worshipping anna, clearly a sociopath, is honestly fascinating
she plays yall so well im impressed
Rachel used Anna so both of them are the worst friends you could ever had
They used each other for their own benefits. Who is worshipping Anna as a con-artist?
Exactly my question. Why are we watching her? Why???
what you should ask is how did the world get so shallow and all about appearances for her to be able to lead on that many people as for that Rachel she was a parasite who just wanted to take advantage of anything she could get until it backfired
Hahaha right😂😂
I don’t think most of y’all understand how convincing sociopaths are.
If you get scammed by local teenager, he is sociopath?
You don't know what is sociopath even mean.. 🤦
Like this one in the video?
I know people are being rude to her but honestly Anna is lowkey crazy and it’s not as if Rachael did not pay for stuff or try Anna insisted on paying and buying her stuff it was part of her show she had to seem
Rich .
@@pajeetsingh yes
Brittany Snow would have been a perfect person to play her
She would perfectly fit in the deal with HBO, I hope they do a version with her story.
I was thinking the exact same thing I love Brittany Snow
they're literally twins
But it would make her infairly likable.
"I was close friends with Anna for a little over 2 months" - girl what
A little over 2 months!!! That’s not a friendship🤣🤣🤣
Sure you where !
Right?! Like you barely knew her, of course you got scammed 🙄
Rachel got more money from those books, interviews, press, than what Anna “ owed “ her.
truly
And Amex took care of the original debt immediately…. So she wasn’t actually owed anything anymore.
@Daniel Flinn Zhou for sure. But like, stop playing victim at that point.
In my view, I do not care about how Rachel took profits after being scammed. But Anna's action shall still be considered as crimes.
@@carlymartin7041 really? Why did they do that? She left it
It's weird how people are dragging Williams for reporting Anna Delvey. Accepting someone's unsolicited offers to buy you things does not entitle that person to scam you and it doesn't absolve any conning. So whether or not Williams was "opportunistic" is irrelevant as she had every right to report and write about what happened without question. Zola did it lol However you choose to see it, Delvey is still a con artist.
Exactly. I'm really really worried about the moral compass of people here.
I don't blame Rachel, make all the money you can off that narcissist, she absolutely would do the same and more.
My thoughts
Exactly! At least she really has this money and doesn’t just pretend!
I don't blame her either, from my point of view, this is the right thing to do to recover in many aspects from the trauma .
Even though Rachel was gullible, she didn't deserve to be robbed of her money. Hopefully, nothing Anna ever does will prosper and she will be forgotten about which is basically the worst thing that could happen to a narcissist.
She has Netflix deal
@@eireenlustre9497 and she's already lost 2/3 of that money to pay restitution. She probably lost more with all the spending she did between her release from prison and her deportation proceedings.
@@eireenlustre9497 actually that was produced by shonda rhimes and was based off the article by Jessica Priestley Anna had nothing to do with that series and actually the money from that will be going to a victim's fund
@@satyendrandonibanerjee8682 Anna was paid 320,000 dollars by Netflix for that show. She spent around 200,000 restitution for the banks and 25,000 on state fines, with 95,000 dollars left.
@@brianamlitt Kendall Rae really needs to fact check her early vids. SMH
The actress Katie Lowes did an amazing job emulating the insincerity and faux innocence Rachel exudes. I can see it here, Rachel really took from Anna despite Anna taking from Rachel. She thought she got a friend who had $$$ and enjoyed the ride.
You make no sense. Anna offered to pay for everything that Rachel was along with and never asked for repayment. Anna LIED to Rachel about paying her back. If Anna had been honest and said Rachel had to pay her own way then Rachel would have not gone. Anna lied about being able to afford the trip and continued lying after the trip.
What's wrong with (thinking you have) having a rich friend?
Well said!!
Why is everyone here so eager to demonize Rachel... I think we all see a bit of ourselves in her and are quick to disavow it. I personally have gone on a vacation that was mostly paid for by a friend, and I can tell you it's hard to say no to... and why, if the other person can afford it?
@@eemoogee160 nada, but she didn't investigate like she should have. I have wealthy friends in NYC and had 'RICH' friends in LA...very different and easy to distinguish between them. All you have to do is know and investigate them to ensure.
Can we please stop interviewing this girl already 😭😭😭😭
ikr, but she sold the book deal, the money will sell her story as much as possible
@@evanh9301 Oh I know and the worst part is she has been reimbursed by her credit card company already so she’s just milking it..you’d think she played a major part in Anna’s story but no 😂😂
Lol she is still doing interviews l
...before you marry your husband, make sure he is indeed Queen Elizabeth's son... don't just take his word for it...
She wasn't Anna's "friend". She "pretended" to be her friend until she found out she wasn't rich and an inconvenience to her...
…allegedly. If you're getting your info from 'Inventing Anna' then keep in mind that Netflix's primary motivation with the series was to entertain rather than inform, and several people directly connected with the Sorokin case have contradicted Rachel's portrayal in the show. A cynic might also point out that Rachel sold her story to HBO rather than Netflix so the latter might have an axe to grind! At the very least let's agree that Hollywood has a terrible reputation when it comes to historical accuracy.
Your thought process doesn't match your username. Rachel didn't ask to hang out with Anna. Anna was clinging to her like she did with Neff. The only difference is that Anna paid back the $200 bill she stuck Neff with and didnt pay the $65,000 bill she stuck Rachel with.
@@hunter98764 I was thinking the same thing not until I watched an interview of the real Kacy, the other friend and she's claiming the portrayal of Rachel is true. So the netflix rep is true to the actual people involved. It's not right what Anna did to Rachel, but we can't also deny that she was a social climber at some point.
60k isn’t an “inconvenience” what planet are you guys ON
@@misschelle23 to an extent she was a social climber (as was everyone in that friendship group and indeed the wider New York social scene), though Netflix dialled that up to 11 and did a hitjob on her. For example the show portrays Rachel as getting repaid by Amex before the trial and suggests she's out to greedily profit and get unnecessary revenge on Anna. In actuality the debt was forgiven months after the trial ended.
It's obvious that they wanted to cast Anna in a semi-positive light and therefore needed a semi-villain in the form of Rachel. I'm also disgusted at how Anna is using the show to launch a career and Netflix seems to be aiding her in that. Why does America worship con artists so much?
Close friends for two months? I've had blisters last longer than this 😂
We need to make it to the year mark and pass my scrutiny and checks before I consider anyone a true friend
I can’t stand this woman Rachel playing the victim. She isn’t that innocent and has herself to blame. Not only the credit card comp ended up not charging her most of the money, she also is making the money from the book she wrote about this.
Exposing the sociopath is extremely satisfying
"she isn't that innocent" she isn't promoting Christian values or abstinence, plus it sounds disgusting when men say that about females
So? There’s nothing wrong with what she did. She exposed a scammer that scammed her and others.
Okay, so there’s that. But does that mean you let the sociopath off the hook?
@@arikalamari19 well said
Wait! Were they only friends for 2 months? The whole time I thought they had been friends for at least 2 yrs! One of my best friends and I were best friends for a whole yr and the only thing I ever bought her was a candy bar. I was an unemployed teenager though.
This is so relatable 😂. At least your friendship is genuine
In her Vanity Fair article that Rachel wrote, she said they were friends since January 2016 and then the Morocco trip was in May 2017... So I guess maybe math isn't her strong suit?? 😆
Paying for affordable food is the only appropriate thing to do. You don't gift dresses without the other person's birthday
Strung her along the Moroccan trip repayment for 2months, not friendship
You weren't her friend. You were a friend of her money. And what she could buy you. It was a poetic justice using your credit cards for the Morocco vacation. I don't feel sorry for you.
exactly. I have friends who are like this. Mixture of opportunist, scrub and toxic. There for the ride cos i got the money. Its sad and pity. I don't feel sorry for her either.
Sadly, all people are friends for an ulterior motive, be it your fun personality, your status" your knowledge or whatever other thing
Did you even watch the video? 2:07
Spot on
"Rachel picked up the bill." Actually, she didn't. She committed credit card fraud after her own card was declined (so she definitely had no intention of pitching in for so much as a round of drinks on the trip). The only reason she's not sharing a cell with Anna right now is that she basically worked off her debt to Vanity Fair by selling them her exclusive story.
How did Rachel commit card fraud? Please elaborate on your assertion.
@@LOKI77able She charged everything to Vanity Fair.
@@user-kb8qw7dy4t Really? Rachel does mention "her" Vanity Fair corporate card in her book, but all the while she claims that several ten thousand dollars were charged to her (rather than Vanity Fair) in connection with her trip to Morocco
@@LOKI77able I haven't read Rachel's book, but the jury acquitted Anna of stealing money from Rachel, so she can stop playing the victim already.
@@user-kb8qw7dy4t I see. I've noticed that not a few people call Rachel an opportunist
“close friends for two months”
Go sell the clothes that anna bought for you if you really wanted that 60K back.
You didn't get scam, you enjoyed the fancy restaurants and the trip for free.
It wasn't free. She paid for it.
Alexa Bella Muerte she successfully disputed the cards charges
@@TheLifelongdream ooooh
@@TheLifelongdream after almost 2 years. In that time she was financially ruined with no end in sight and that's stressful.
The stress between that time and when she got it sorted was harrowing!
So you were using her when you were believing she was an heiress? You enjoyed all those perks huh? And the user got used and got mad? What crime did she commit when you GAVE them your credit card WILLINGLY
No. I’d never accept a trip like from someone I’ve only known for 2 months. And milking that story for years is extreme.
Just because she got the money back and more, doesn’t remove the trauma of the situation. We make mistakes and we hate ourselves for it, but we shouldn’t take responsibility for being a victim.
So true idk why everyone is victim blame her
Yes but she also profited heavily of the trauma. If she had just gotten her money back then it would’ve been fine because she didn’t deserve to be 62k in debt. But she made half a million dollars off that story selling it to the highest bidder and still got her money back…..not to mention all the stuff Anna payed for her before…..
When somebody is this starry eyed and sweet as honey, it's time to make a beeline towards the exit. You, girl, are anything but innocent.
I don't buy any of it either. Like a journalist living in New York would be this naïve. It's all an act.
@@adeel-eh7xq she’s not a journalist. She was an assistant photo editor at VF.
But we're cool when Neff and Kaci does the same thing??? Did you forget how Neff was ready to sever her relationship with her when she didnt pay that hotel bill, which threatened her job and made her go into her film fund to pay for dinner?? Was Rachel the best kinda of friend not in the least. did she deserve to have what happened to her? No way.
@@rhey81 Oh. And what about deserting your 'friend', making a bee line for the exit at the very first opportunity, forgetting about the countless occasions when this 'sweet pea' was enjoying those lavish parties, dinners and getaways at the expense of Sorokin? Never thought of questioning where all that money came from as long as she wasn't the one paying the bills but enjoying all the benefits. Yea, this girl must be a real angel. Very selfless to have 'offered' to pay this one time and took the first chance to make an exit to save her dear life.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but to me she's as fake as botox.
Having said that, I'm not glorifying what Sorokin did at all. But this girl, I've seen her kind. They are snakes. Will turn on you the minute you're of no use to them.
@@rhey81 The difference is Rachel is the one who set her up and the one milking this for hundreds of thousands with a book deal, interviews, and selling her story. The other two have been just living their lives.
I don’t get why people are so mean to this girl. If someone offered me a paid vacation and insisted on all of it I’m pretty sure 99% of you guys would do it and she probably did lend the money because what else would happen she go to jail !!! And Anna got so many people convinced she had money and you could trust her !
I agree!
Ito din po first thought ko kaso nung niyaya kasi siya ni anna sabi niya wala siya pera tapos nung talbog pala tsike napahiram niya kaya nagmukha siya tuloy mang gagamit
People like you think 99 percent would accept such thing… sigh.. She was fine with her friend paying for the whole thing, but she can’t pay even for herself.. if you can’t afford sth you simply don’t do it and try to improve your life by attaching yourself to rich people. Looks like this is best thing happened to this ordinary girl. She even took her money back thanks to AmEX
@@nh7568 but Anna was the one who suggested the most expensive room in the most expensive villa and offered to pay for all of it so all her friends went along to just enjoy the trip if rachel wanted to pay for herself she would’ve gone with a cheaper room and paid for her self
@@himanshisobti6937 well she should have said no and stayed in a cheaper room by herself then. She doesn’t even offer to pay a portion of the bill herself. Neff (the girl who works at the hotel) was also invited to the trip but she chose not to go thinking it’s not appropriate to accept such gift and things usually don’t come for free.
Why is everyone blaming her and worshiping Anna? Am I missing something? For a billionaire inviting friends to trips would barely cost anything, and considering Anna literally offered to, how was that Rachel's fault...? I dont understand the thought process of so many people in here...
Hmmm I’m seeing about 95 percent comments complaining about comments praising Anna…and 5 percent comments praising Anna.
The fact that people are so hateful so Rachel when she really is a victim is baffling to me. Anna is a scammer con artist who literally convinced top banks and loan company’s that she was legit, he mad at Anna for scamming so many people out of so much money. What Anna did is NOT okay and I’m tired of people glamorizing her.
I know that documentary was 🤮. They clearly wanted us to like Anna.
I’m so surprised people miss the point. Anna is nothing glamorous. She is a little liar.
@@missl849 that wasn’t a true documentary. But they played up Anna’s sociopath side. The movie just plays into that and does it well. If you left the movie feeling like you like Anna, then her spell worked. 🙂
I was supportive of Rachel until I listened to her book. Unfortunately, she makes it hard to like her. Rachel makes herself sound greedy and native. She cares so much about clout. Her book is full of that, and it's boring to listen to.
I don't understand how people can sympathise with her either though.... She let her rich friend buy so many things for her, probably amounting to a lot more than the $62K she shouted. How is she a victim for paying for her fair share?
You are an opportunist too. A decent person doesn't accept others to lavish them with trips. You say "no thank you, I will pay for my own hotel and we can meet during the day". You lent her your credit card BC you felt in debt for accepting her free lunches/dinners.
Not judging cuz I wasn't involved in the whole situation, however I just don't think I would EVER be comfortable with a new friend of only TWO MONTHS asking me to even go on an out of country vacation with. 🤔
You live a completely different life with completely different circumstances.
Girl the charges were dropped and you’re making lemons out of lemonade.
As she should.
The thing is that Rachel actually used Anna for “her money”; she took and took and how am I supposed to feel bad for her because she went to Morocco and expected to have a trip of luxury and not pay a single dollar because she living off of someone else? I’m sorry but no.
Aaaaaaa
truly and on top of it sold her for $630k while amex refunded the amount charged on her work card. okay bye Rachel!
Anna was the one inviting her to the hotel and offering to pay for services and meals. Plus anything Anna paid was never her actual money...
@@euwandelatorre467 well would you rather go to jail and be stuck in a foreign country bc your friend couldn't pay? Or pay using your company card and risk losing your job?....there wasn't much of an option.
@@lidia4474 😴😴😴
If you're mad at Rachel, then you’ve just been scammed by Anna.
Let me ask you -- would you let someone you hardly know-pay for your food, cloth, vacations etc-- for years ???? And than go and sell your fony story for over-600000 usd-- and still pretened you are "innocent" ??? AnnA-IS A SCAMER , BUT RACHEL- IS A SNKE, I WOULD NEVER WANT " A FRIEND LIKE HER- WOULD YOU ?? RACHEL IS SO FONY SO GREEDY THAT SHE GIVES ANNA LESSONES
Rachel wanted a rich friend
Monique would so easily get conned
Lol exactly. People are harsher on the victim than the ACTUAL criminal. Like Anna would love to hear you all say that’s me then she cry to you about how annoying Rachel is and use you too.
Careful, Monique. You sound like a perfect mark for Anna. Don't go lending anyone money now, you hear.
The victim blaming of rachel is the most telling thing about this whole episode. Oh, and neffs enabling of a criminal and exceptionally problematic behaviour in general....
‘She’s a Rachel’ means: a person freeloading someone else while calling them friends and play victim when table turns.
How is she freeloading when she was willing to pay? Do you think an intelligent and manipulative and calculating free loader would do that?
bruh not my name 😩
Yeah it’s not free loading when you literally lie and steal money under false pretences. Not saying Rachel is a great person or anything but Anna completely scammed her out of that money. Do it to large faceless banks is one thing but doing it to individuals which can legitimately ruin their lives is just evil.
@@jodypaul1950 it is freeloading. What u’re saying is ‘scamming’. Rachel tried to freeload from her ‘rich’ friend believing she’s worth all that special treatment not expecting to pay back. Anna scams bc from the beginning, she lies to steal
‘Evil’ it was. But the movie portrayed Anna’s justification really well. She was outcasted by her high school friends whose superficiality turned Anna to a victim of bully. Later she projected her revenge on all the superficial ‘teenagers’ she met while in NY
@@metaphor5774 also the Netflix series is a terrible source of information and perspective. It’s main purported is entertainment and character redemption lol so don’t put any stock into it.
"If this is the worst thing that has ever happened to you, I want your luck"
Rachel is much more centered and prettier than her character in Inventing Anna.
Right? I don't hate the actress but I think the "Rachel" on Inventing Anna is soooo annoying
Yes! It's weird how the real life person is better looking and more charismatic than an actual actress
She looks like Elizabeth Holmes with a normal voice.
@@angelica8000 They needed a scape goat to make Anna look better in the show and decided to just throw Rachel under the bus, pure deceit and just overall nasty work by Netflix
You should be in prison also. You sold yourself off though
Had it Anna not been arrested , we wouldn't know this whole situation.
This girl should actually be thanking Anna because she thought she had a friend who had money she could use .... she was wrong.
Beware of friends like Rachel !!
Beware of friends like Anna!!
Beware of friends like Rachel and Anna :)
@@adeel-eh7xq haha this!
Everyone is sh*tying on Rachel calling her an opportunist but wasn’t Anna doing the exact same thing to other people in her life?? But WORSE owing way more £££ Rachel was scammed regardless if she was fake friends with Anna that’s not the point
This girl is a troll. Don’t feel sorry for her
I mean you were ok when She paid all your needs....you are not a nice person as well
My silence is probably stronger than my words.” Wait... What? Court appearances, network television interviews, and a book... this chick has been anything but silent.
Americans are strange to warship a scam artist. These comments are scary. She’s do what she did to Rachel to any one of us easily.
I'm equally surprised by her sick these comments are 🤦🏾♀️
One thing I never understood was how Rachel accumulated all this excess debt and loans from friends if American Express forgave the charges. It seems to me that she was living paycheck to paycheck as was. I don’t think she could have even gone on the trip at all if Anna had not offered to pay for it. What Anna did was wrong, but anyone who thinks Rachel was not a bit of a user herself is kidding themselves. Just my opinion!
Clearly you know nothing about the situation, the audacity to do zero research and self-righteously share your blatantly incorrect opinion is pretty embarrassing. Are you naive enough to think that Amex of all companies would complete a fraud investigation overnight and send the money back the next day?
I think no matter what Rachel is a victim , Anna had no problem taking her money , and she knew she never pay her back. That ‚s it.
I disagree. I followed this case from the start and I sincerely believe Anna was just waiting for her Fortress loan to be funded (and was being string along by them for several weeks after first being told she was approved, before backtracking and needing to do more "due diligence"). I believe Anna would have paid all her currently outstanding debts in full had that funding come through as our finally promised.
Yet she clearly knew she didn't have the money for the Morocco trip up front, but she was in a bind with needing to leave her current hotel and get her travel passport/visa stamped elsewhere, but she was being told her loan was approved and would be funded any day now, so she likely didn't see any harm in having Rachel cover expenses in the short term.
That said, I don't think she feels bad about what she did to Rachel AT ALL...and she would have covered her debts if funded - NOT because it was the right thing to do - but rather because she didn't want anyone to ever think she couldn't pay, or that she was poor.
She would rather be seen as careless or ditzy, and so was okay with making excuses and playing that part because it would be better to be ditzy than poor/struggling.
I mean tbh, it would probably happen to me by accident if someone was faking being rich and famous. She didn’t deserve to be robbed for that money regardless if they were friends at the time
She is the one expecting Anna to pay for everything all those 2 months. Something went wrong in Morocco and shes hesitant to foot the bill for Anna. She obviously befriended her for money. She is bever willing to spend for the “supposed” friendship. And now she is using Anna and kept on using her to earn more money. What Anna owed her has already been paid. She is a user and she should learn to keep her mouth shut.
'Close friends' for 2 months lol girl get a grip. You should be thanking Anna. Literally because of what happened to you now you're somebody.
The thing though is that I have no remorse for her.. she got what was owed to her through Amex and through other methods. Now, going back to that time in their “friendship”… Rachel just comes out looking like a freeloader. Who constantly accepts so many gifts and even a free vacation? Who’s actually comfortable with their friend doing that, even if they’re doing better than you? It just shows that she was going along with the ride and eventually it caught up with her
But as it stands, Anna was counting on Rachel’s follower personality for her ruse. She needed a devoted fan and supporter. She’s the one who didn’t want to work for a living. She’s the actual predator. How are you overlooking the sociopath in all of this? If you do, the sociopath has worked you over successfully.
People with this happy go lucky, golden retriever demeanor are the wolves in sheeps clothing we have to look out for.
10000%. This girl is SO fake.
People can see through her. She's a typical social climber friend a free loader. Then when she gets to pay the bill she squirms and played victim 🙄
She's not innocent
@@sparkleglitz1794 I’m glad I’m not the only one who sees it..
Right? She looks hella “traumatized” from the glitz, cash, and fame she gained from it.
If Anna were Rachel, she would’ve done the same thing. A lot of you are victim blaming it’s crazy. When an opportunity is offered, who wouldn’t accept it? It’s not like other friends paid for anything either. Rachel was just the only one scammed hard and that did something about it.
Its terrible that the jury didn't ensure that Anna pay Rachel back by convicting Anna of that theft. Conning is a crime. Rachel didn't hand over her card to pay, but as a hold. Anna agreed to pay, then ditched her. Rachel lost her savings and couldn't afford rent. As a therapist, I can truly say Anna meets criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder (sociopath). Anyone who defends Anna and blames Rachel is falling into the same trap everyone else has who fell for Anna's conning charm.
Rachel said herself in the interview AmEx waived the 62k. She didn’t lose a cent. But profited hundred fold instead. Stop playing victim.
I don't think a lot of people are looking to blame her, just pointing out she was irresponsible
@@donnam7766 why’s that an issue? Seems like smart move to make give the situation
Why didn’t they just split ?! There were I think 4 people so divided by 4. I don’t want to make excuses for Anna but why should she potentially reimburse the expenses of all? Rachel was also there and she can pay her part of the holiday if something goes downhill
I agree with the jury. True it is that Anna’s behavior was horrible. I cannot believe someone would scam a person with no money without ever crossing their mind their are literally ruining someone life. However, Rachel was not forced or threatened. She was an adult, and should have thought twice about leaving the country with no money or back up plan. At what point does it start crossing your mind that gifts, that expensive and that often, require reciprocation. She herself walked into the wolf’s mouth.
You were not her friend...at all. She did bad stuff, but you were NOT her friend. You were taking advantage of her money...That's it
So funny how people in comment section were also conned by Anna. 😂 Obviously, Rachel is a victim and she never asked to be treated to trips. Anna lure and insisted to pay for everything at the start. Rachel handed the card only as a hold for Morroco but there was a clear understanding between her and Anna that Anna will pay her back. So it doesn't really matter if Anna spends for her Rachel at the start, what matters is Anna didn't pay her back as she promised she will, and kept on dragging the issue even copying fictitious people in her email.
Rachel was also hoping to "tag along" with a wealthy person.
And? If I had a rich friend that offered to take me somewhere and pay for everything I’d go without hesitation. If that vacation to them is like a cheeseburger to me then what’s the issue?
@@mkharris08 I know. But I'd still want to like that person. The problem here is that Rachel did not like Anna, she just tagged along with her because she wanted to be pampered.
Y’all hadn’t even boarded the plane yet and you were already footing the bill yea that was already a red flag..
Some people complain about Rachel being a mooch, other people complain about her paying for Anna! I hope none of y'all have ever made a mistake in your lives because the victim blaming and lack of empathy is unreal.
Who else is back here after the show aired.
For all the people who are blaming Rachel, is she bad just for accepting a luxurious trip from a new rich "friend"? Definitely not the best idea but she was not trying to scam someone. I often offer things I can afford to my close friends. They did the same when they first got job. It is not a crime to accept it.
Same I do t blame Rachael at all
Not blaming her but I personally don't like how she portays herself as a victim. She was happy that her friend was paying for everything prior to this incident. Az you were saying you are happy to pay for your friends and when your friends were able they would pay for you. Anna was indeed a sociooath because we know now the whole story, but based on Rachelle's story, Anna has just been a horrible friend. And I wonder also if all the things that Anna paid for her before and during this trip are equivalent to the 62k
No lol but just as a life lesson: it says a lot that she didn’t just go leave the hotel - one of the most expensive and exclusive hotels in the world - immediately (rather she put down her own credit card so she could continue living a lavish “Instagram worthy” lifestyle)
They're both wrong but I don't blame Rachel for providing info to the police. She didn't do it to sell a story but only to get the money that Anna said she can and will pay back.
Then the ultimate universe KARMA.
AmEx already solved her debts before Rachel called police to arrest Anna. So Rachel took revenge for Anna
This happens because, she saw her wearing designer clothing, automatically assume that she has money, and voula. I bet that if was me with my own no designer cloth, she would never look at my way.
I would care for your character and not your money
I’m sorry to be that person but…. It’s voilà :p
@@nickgreu4ever THANK YOU
@@nickgreu4ever ssshhhh they don't like to be corrected because ....BLM or some shiiiii.
User got used! And ur using Anna again.
Seriously, how many times you gotta use this story. Make your own story l, girl. You’re going to ride her coat tail for how much longer?
Rachel is the real OG. I think she is capitalizing more off of this than Anna is.
When she thought she was using anna but she got used instead lol keep milking this story girl. Only proves you are using her all along
I never liked Rachel & I am glad to be proven correct 😌
Sometimes it's so hard to ask help from lawyers and the police
Oh come on, she was having expensive dinners and spa treatments and went shopping many times on Annas account for TWO YEARS. Is that how honest friendship works in the first place??
Umm, Neff and Kaci did the same thing.
@@rhey81 yes, all those relationships seem fake and greedy, far from sincere
Rachel's a goody-goody. Being scammed was the best thing it could happened to her.
i mean 62000, that rachel's bank forgave. she got to enjoy countless dinners, sauna, training sesh and connections and trips from anna. so if anything rachel was just simply paying anna back for all the things rachel enjoyed for "free". and all of a sudden rachel was demanding money back from anna for the morocco trip?
GIRL U LITERALLY DIDNT PAY FOR A THING BEFORE THAT.
You were not scammed ! You wanted to use her and it backfired 😂😂😂😂 and you deserve it
Yes, at least in the end Anna was honest about having no remorse. She was an honest phoney. Now if only politicians and other authority figures would be as honest about their phoniness.
Nonduality facts
It was fine for her to go on trips with her as long as Anna is paying but when it was time for her to pay, that's where she draws the line hahahah loool
if you wear a dress, don’t sit like that gosh💀
Why should actually Anna reimburse her everything? Why didn’t they just split everything and everybody had to pay for their part? It’s not like as if she was not there and enjoying
dont shame her we all want a rich friend. she kinda looks like lilie reinhart
So weird! These days you don‘t ‚go to‘ or ‚talk to‘ your bank in order to transfer money. And you don’t do Morocco without a single penny in your pocket. So it should‘ve been pretty obvious from early on that there‘s nothing to be had.
plus the fact that every card she tried to use anywhere straight up did not work, she says that she never told anyone she was wealthy and everyone around just thought she was. she put bills off by saying there would be a wire transfer, she would tip every hotel employee with 100s. Looks like the money was just blinding everyone. no one questioned it at all because it was just beneficial to them.
They were only friends for 2 months? I imagined it being longer
You weren’t scammed, you scammed her
the victim blaming is insane
The funny thing is I don't even find her to look rich
Now she is suing Netflix for defamation. She put herself out there to make money. Now she cant handle how others opinions of her aren't as a victim. She was never the victim just a opportunist. They both deserved prison.
She was a victim but she is also an opportunist.
She didn't owe you anything.
Girl you have been paid more than 62,000. Anna might not pay you that money herself but you exploding her name, making a book using her name without her consent - you are banking and doing exactly what she was doing but being more political.
*tears* I kept using my friend for free drinks and meals and then expected them to pay for a luxurious all expenses paid trip and then got stuck with the bill for probably less than what she's been spending on me the past few months of knowing her. Then all my debt got forgiven and I got a book deal. Woe is me.
she didn’t expect her to pay for it, anna insisted on paying for it. morocco was a business trip for anna; it wasn’t just a regular vacation
@@laurasomma525 can you tell me when Rachel offered to pay for her part ahead of the trip? I'll wait.
Ooohhh, you poor woman!! Acting like a naive child while all the time freeloading on Anna.
she has a awkward body language
Cause she’s lying I fear
Wow I wish they put all that details in the show. That’s super interesting thanks for sharing 🌸wish you all the best!!
How does she have a credit card limit of more than she makes in a year???
Exactly my question 😆😆
the credit card was a credit card for work expenses - meaning, it actually belonged to her employer, vanity fair.
This girl thinks that everyone is so fool as she is trying making herself look.
You're not as innocent as your voice. She's baddest and your leeching off so what that makes you !
She sold her story for $600,000 - Rachel is the real winner here
Wait. So you are close friends with someone for 2 months and you accept to go on a trip with all expenses paid for? Ha!
This girl was immediately reimbursed by Amex for the charge to her card… and then she proceeded to make boatloads of money with a book deal and loads of paid press crying about being a victim. This girl is as fake as it gets.
Tired of her