GreenestGanja2 Yasser Seirawan is originated from Syria. So that is where his soft tongue comes from :). I also think he would be a great narrator for readings.
+Bud] eNzo Mato Jelic has not the knowledge of Yasser Seirawan. Yasser was one of the best players when he was in his prime! You cannot say the same about Jelic! :D
I was fortunate to meet Yasser and speak with him while at the US Open in Reno/Vegas? back in 1987 or 1988.....he had a playoff game against Lev Alburt for the Championship as I recall. back then I was not even a good patzer...but he spoke with me with dignity and respect. I've never forgotten that. His book "No Regrets" on the 2nd Spassky Fischer match is very good indeed!!
I wish Seirawan would use the mouse to point on the screen when he is doing the variations because we can't see when he is out of the picture. Or the cameraman has to move the camera so the board and his pointing is in our view. Great lecture, though!
0.5 - Yasser remixed by Pink Floyd 0.75 - Yasser on heroin Normal - drunk Yasser 1.25 - Yasser on caffeine 1.5 - Yasser on speed 2.0 - Yasser remixed by Daft Punk
Pirc is pronounced "Peerts", not "Perk". Imagine the English word "pierce" but with a "t" inserted after the "r". It's named after the Yugoslav player Vasja Pirc.
Tal is great and I admire the way he takes chances his opponent won't see how to get out. In the second game, he gave up draw to a clear loss if the right move was found. But wasn't as we saw. But again if 34: Qc3+ this would have done the trick, maybe even winning for white depending on the response. Razor sharp chess.
I learn a lot from Yasser lectures. Not only he explain positional idea in the most comprehensible way but he is a great tactician too. He found 25...Qg5 in spot. Lucky his students can ask him their questions! And about Larsen-Tal game: these guys of course were very creative. Tal was really good at materially unbalanced position. Just look at this game. He gambled and won! but no wonder Robert Fischer beat them all. As Tal himself mentioned Bobby was the first real grandmaster! I think because he is the most precise chess player before computer age. When we check their games with modern engines we can see how rare Bobby blundered . he was ATOMIC MORPHY!
I've found errors by Fischer. So has Kasparov. He was good for a few years then stopped playing. It is not certain he would have beaten the young Tal or healthy Tal or even the young Botvinnik. And no one knows how he would go against Karpov as he stopped playing. Larsen Taimanov and others kept playing. Karpov played many great games after 1975. Sure he was a classicist which is why he admired Capablanca but he made errors, plenty of them...
At the pivotal point in the game after the queen sacrifice, black plays 16...Qc5. I wanted an explanation but Yasser said 'only move'. A bit skeptical I checked the engine and it's the engine's 3rd move. I wish he explained black's options there because I'm mystified.
I am a tactical player and now I understand what a positional player is that a person who Build one block at the time trying to improve HIS position and win the end game
@@karanvirsingh2830 Did you rewatch the whole video to find that particular situation, or you are an excellent chess player who remembers the moves of the game he saw, like GMs do?
please tell the grand master that he can point with the mouse and he will accomplish two things. that the audience and us the viewers will see what is he pointing to.
This has definitely nothing to do with "guts" or "glory". You're just advocating a certain way to play a board game. Some people think it's more fun not to handicap yourself for no good reason (since Tal was simply better in complex positions than he was in more simple positions).
In game 2 GM Yasser Seirawan was soo confused after B x f4 move by white....He immediately says e x f4 but thats not Tals way my dear....Here is the move variations...check it out. after B x f4 Qxe4, Nxe5 Rxf4, Rxf4 Ng2+, Kd1 Qxf4, Nc4 Bh6, Qc3 Qxh2, Rb1 Nf4, Bf3 Bf5, Ra1 Nd3, Be2 Qg1+, Kc2 Nc5+, Bd3 Bxd3+, Qxd3 Qf2, Qd2 Bxd2, Nxd2 Qf5+, Kc1 Qc8, Kb1 Nd3, Nb3 Qc4, Nb6 axb6, a4 Qxb3, a5 Qxb2+ Black wins... Another Variation after Bxf4 Qxe4, Nxe5 Rxf4, Qxe4 Rxe4, Nd3 Ng2+, Kd2 Bh6+, Kc3 Rxe2, Ra1 Re8, Nf2 Ne3, Rg1 Bg2, Ng4 Bg7+, Kd2 Nc4+, Kc2 Be4+, Kb3 Nd2+, Ka3 Rxa8....Black wins.....Tal the Greatest ever Man
@ 47:45 if White played 1.Kf1 then Black has 1_Qc4+ and picks up the White QP next with tempo and the Knights still are separated too much to defend effectively against the coordinated Q and R attacking the exposed White King?
Need one game per video, per title. otherwise people interested in this video's second game, the KID, will skip over this video because the title will not come up when they enter the keyword Kings Indian, in the search box if it is not in the title.
Yeah, 16...Qc5? was a mistake running to a fork on move19. Better for white was 16.Be6! Qd6 (only move) 17.Rd6 Kd6 18.Bf4 Ne5 19.Be5 Ke5 20.Re1 Kd6 21.Na8 fg 22.Bh3 Ra8 23.Bg2 +/- and also black should have played 25...fg with good drawing chance
Instead of Q to c5 as in the game (11:40 on the video) which allows the fork of the black king and queen what about Q-a5 which avoids the fork? I can't see how then RxB ch wins. Maybe NxB instead but then black has N-e5 and what then? After B-d2 attacking the queen, NxB, BxQ,NxB,N-c7 check, move the king, NxR, RxN and white is a pawn ahead,
11:17, why Qc5, why not Qd6 and try to get a rook for it rather than nothing and at 12:00 to do bxf6 before re-capturing the queen so you get a pawn for the bishop 13:30 why did the knight go to B4 and not D4 where it could seemingly be more practical
+Steve Burt About Qd6, it could be, but still winning for white because of the exposed king. At 12:00, Tal saw that Td7+ was a stronger continuation, and pawn at g5 take away a square from the running king. I agree with you about Nd4.
+Steve Burt Your first move was the move I actually thought of myself. You may lose your queen but if they didn't take it they didn't care about it anyway, hense you sacrifice it for the avoidance of checkmate
In the second game, in 22.58, why not black play Queen to B6? Double attack, knight cannot be protected and at the same time block the check. After that there is a discover attack for white bad not with promising chances to fight back...
For Game 2 exactly video at 36.41 minutes and my dear for Nf2.....here is the move Nf2 Nf3+, Kd1 Nd4, Qc3 f3, Bd3 Qxh2, Nxh3 Qe2+, Bxe2 fxe2+, Ke1 exf1 =Q+ or Rxf1 checkmate.... No wonder Tal is well beyond your imaginations....Tal the greatest man.
Hi Yasser, what book pray tell were you using? Thanks for all your kind and fastidious work to teach our noble art and science! All the best to you and the STL Chess club staff and members!
I am having a lot of trouble making out what he is saying. His soft voice sounds great, but he could enunciate a little more effectively. Well, guess you can't be good at everything :P Maybe some closed captions in the future?
15:48 Did you really say Eersel? That's just some lame ass village 20km from here. But they got Dominator! :) Btw, the pronounciation was spot on, except for the accent
Play Bishop x e6 !! Now Queen c5, Rook d7+, King f8, Rook f7+, King g8, Rook x f6 # I wonder why Tal didnt see this??Anyone see this in five years time here? Believe it , or not...I got this idea without chessprog or any other help.
Just because Black didn't play the best defense doesn't mean that White (Tal) was good, or that his sacrifices were sound. Matter of fact, they weren't, and there were many points where Black could have achieved equality, but again, didn't play the best defensive moves. Tal really wasn't that great.
How is it possible for someone to be so enthusiastic yet so calm at the same time
Yasser is one of a kind 😂
Tal was otherworldly. By far the most creative and entertaining player. What a genius.
Something about this mans voice made me stay for more.
GreenestGanja2
Yasser Seirawan is originated from Syria. So that is where his soft tongue comes from :). I also think he would be a great narrator for readings.
+thereal pua Mato Jelic I like better but this guy is good :) Very calm and easy.
+Bud] eNzo Mato Jelic has not the knowledge of Yasser Seirawan. Yasser was one of the best players when he was in his prime! You cannot say the same about Jelic! :D
+Bud] eNzo you are right... i am fan of Mato... and yaseer also good
+Bud] eNzo you are right... i am fan of Mato... and yaseer also good
I was fortunate to meet Yasser and speak with him while at the US Open in Reno/Vegas? back in 1987 or 1988.....he had a playoff game against Lev Alburt for the Championship as I recall. back then I was not even a good patzer...but he spoke with me with dignity and respect. I've never forgotten that. His book "No Regrets" on the 2nd Spassky Fischer match is very good indeed!!
I wish Seirawan would use the mouse to point on the screen when he is doing the variations because we can't see when he is out of the picture. Or the cameraman has to move the camera so the board and his pointing is in our view.
Great lecture, though!
Luckily he always says which moves is he pointing to, so it is still possible to follow.
Yasser you are best speaker ever !! I like your videos so much !! Your enthusiasm is incredible ! Thank you very much !
What a captivating game and Yasser made it even interesting. Great analysis Sir. You are awesome!!
sir, do you have a job i can have, sir? i want money to play chess, sir
I feel blessed watching to this video. Thank you GM Yasser and thank you Saint Louis Chess Club.
Another Nice video by Yasser. yOU ARE a charming guy.
love the pumpin music at the end of each vid, YEW!
perfect at 1,25 speed
lol it is better he sounds normal.
try 0.75, damn son. great lecture all the same his passion really translates
0.5 - Yasser remixed by Pink Floyd
0.75 - Yasser on heroin
Normal - drunk Yasser
1.25 - Yasser on caffeine
1.5 - Yasser on speed
2.0 - Yasser remixed by Daft Punk
normal=normal
Slow your brain down.
I read one of Yasser's books. It really heped me.
I'm not going on
Thanks! :D
Pirc is pronounced "Peerts", not "Perk". Imagine the English word "pierce" but with a "t" inserted after the "r". It's named after the Yugoslav player Vasja Pirc.
Now you need to explain how to pronounce ´Vasja´ ;0
@@PinkasBrown44 Just pronounce the 'j' like the English consonant 'y'.
Tal is great and I admire the way he takes chances his opponent won't see how to get out. In the second game, he gave up draw to a clear loss if the right move was found. But wasn't as we saw. But again if 34: Qc3+ this would have done the trick, maybe even winning for white depending on the response. Razor sharp chess.
What's that book he's getting the games from?
Wow what a game!
I'd like to mention that 3.Nxe5 is playable, too.
@16:40 Interestingly, this is called Anti-Anti Grunfeld variant of the English opening.
I learn a lot from Yasser lectures. Not only he explain positional idea in the most comprehensible way but he is a great tactician too. He found 25...Qg5 in spot. Lucky his students can ask him their questions! And about Larsen-Tal game: these guys of course were very creative. Tal was really good at materially unbalanced position. Just look at this game. He gambled and won! but no wonder Robert Fischer beat them all. As Tal himself mentioned Bobby was the first real grandmaster! I think because he is the most precise chess player before computer age. When we check their games with modern engines we can see how rare Bobby blundered . he was ATOMIC MORPHY!
***** You should know that Fischer was 16 when he lost those 4 games against Tal.
inViewPoint
Tal beat his ass anyway.
I've found errors by Fischer. So has Kasparov. He was good for a few years then stopped playing. It is not certain he would have beaten the young Tal or healthy Tal or even the young Botvinnik. And no one knows how he would go against Karpov as he stopped playing. Larsen Taimanov and others kept playing. Karpov played many great games after 1975. Sure he was a classicist which is why he admired Capablanca but he made errors, plenty of them...
At the pivotal point in the game after the queen sacrifice, black plays 16...Qc5. I wanted an explanation but Yasser said 'only move'. A bit skeptical I checked the engine and it's the engine's 3rd move. I wish he explained black's options there because I'm mystified.
Even Qd6 defending e6 could be an idea.. I would like more explanation too about Qc5 as being 'only option'
I am a tactical player and now I understand what a positional player is that a person who Build one block at the time trying to improve HIS position and win the end game
at 1.5 speed he speaks at normal speed xD
lol
Jesus christ I can't watch Yasser's videos the same way anymore Q.Q
YOU RUINED EVERYTHING!!!!!!!! I can't stop laughing
Stockfish 8 says that during most of the attack it's equal until Qh7 was played
was Yassar flustered for out benefit??
In Tal's game, why not move the black Q from h3 to d6 instead of c5?
Both are Tal's games. Also, which move? No wonder you didn't get reply in 4 years.
@@yanair2091 He is talking about 11:30 😂😂But Tal would still checkmate
@@karanvirsingh2830 Did you rewatch the whole video to find that particular situation, or you are an excellent chess player who remembers the moves of the game he saw, like GMs do?
@ 38:28. can white play R f2?
Always like the one with a wicked genius
please tell the grand master that he can point with the mouse and he will accomplish two things. that the audience and us the viewers will see what is he pointing to.
Amen!
smooth
I don't know why he says Qc5 is the only move when there is Qb4, Qa4, or Qa5.
Playing the Elephant Gambit vs Tal...um yeahhh...
***** Big dough at stake sometimes ;)
***** No? Check out the prizes at the big tourny's...keep in mind you have to factor in inflation.
***** No need I have been there done that for the past 40 years ;)
***** no prawlim dood
This has definitely nothing to do with "guts" or "glory". You're just advocating a certain way to play a board game. Some people think it's more fun not to handicap yourself for no good reason (since Tal was simply better in complex positions than he was in more simple positions).
In game 2 GM Yasser Seirawan was soo confused after B x f4 move by white....He immediately says e x f4 but thats not Tals way my dear....Here is the move variations...check it out.
after B x f4 Qxe4, Nxe5 Rxf4, Rxf4 Ng2+, Kd1 Qxf4, Nc4 Bh6, Qc3 Qxh2, Rb1 Nf4, Bf3 Bf5, Ra1 Nd3, Be2 Qg1+, Kc2 Nc5+, Bd3 Bxd3+, Qxd3 Qf2, Qd2 Bxd2, Nxd2 Qf5+, Kc1 Qc8, Kb1 Nd3, Nb3 Qc4, Nb6 axb6, a4 Qxb3, a5 Qxb2+ Black wins...
Another Variation
after Bxf4 Qxe4, Nxe5 Rxf4, Qxe4 Rxe4, Nd3 Ng2+, Kd2 Bh6+, Kc3 Rxe2, Ra1 Re8, Nf2 Ne3, Rg1 Bg2, Ng4 Bg7+, Kd2 Nc4+, Kc2 Be4+, Kb3 Nd2+, Ka3 Rxa8....Black wins.....Tal the Greatest ever Man
Thumbs up.
@ 47:45 if White played 1.Kf1 then Black has 1_Qc4+ and picks up the White QP next with tempo and the Knights still are separated too much to defend effectively against the coordinated Q and R attacking the exposed White King?
Need one game per video, per title. otherwise people interested in this video's second game, the KID, will skip over this video because the title will not come up when they enter the keyword Kings Indian, in the search box if it is not in the title.
11:26 if black is up a queen and lost, why does the computer give Qa4 and Qa5?
Yeah, 16...Qc5? was a mistake running to a fork on move19. Better for white was 16.Be6! Qd6 (only move) 17.Rd6 Kd6 18.Bf4 Ne5 19.Be5 Ke5 20.Re1 Kd6 21.Na8 fg 22.Bh3 Ra8 23.Bg2 +/- and also black should have played 25...fg with good drawing chance
Tal played alien chess.
Instead of Q to c5 as in the game (11:40 on the video) which allows the fork of the black king and queen what about Q-a5 which avoids the fork? I can't see how then RxB ch wins. Maybe NxB instead but then black has N-e5 and what then? After B-d2 attacking the queen, NxB, BxQ,NxB,N-c7 check, move the king, NxR, RxN and white is a pawn ahead,
11:17, why Qc5, why not Qd6 and try to get a rook for it rather than nothing and at 12:00 to do bxf6 before re-capturing the queen so you get a pawn for the bishop
13:30 why did the knight go to B4 and not D4 where it could seemingly be more practical
+Steve Burt About Qd6, it could be, but still winning for white because of the exposed king. At 12:00, Tal saw that Td7+ was a stronger continuation, and pawn at g5 take away a square from the running king. I agree with you about Nd4.
+Steve Burt Your first move was the move I actually thought of myself. You may lose your queen but if they didn't take it they didn't care about it anyway, hense you sacrifice it for the avoidance of checkmate
Qd6 is unfortunate due to Rxe6+ and the queen is lost for no compensation due to the double protection on e6.
Yasser speaks in slow motion.
Larsen's defense was amazing in that KID.
What the hell I watched this video yesterday and now my account is drained.
Another variation For Game 2 exactly video at 36.41 minutes and my dear for Nf2.....here is the move
Nf2 Nf3+, Kd1 Nd4, Qc3 f3, Bd3 Qxh2, Qc4 Bxf1, Bxf1 Qxf2, Rc2 Nxc2, Kxc2 Bh6, Qc8+ Rf8, Qe6+ Rf7, Qc8+ Kg7, Qg4+ Kh8, Qc8+ Rf8, Qc3 Qxf1, Bxh6 Rxa8, Qc7 Rg8, Bd2 f2, Kc3 Qe2, Qf7 f1=Q, Qxf1 Qxf1 Black wins.....
11:25 Black is certainly *not* lost. 1...Qa5 is the best move and the position is equal
In the second game, in 22.58, why not black play Queen to B6? Double attack, knight cannot be protected and at the same time block the check. After that there is a discover attack for white bad not with promising chances to fight back...
+Nasos Malakos Nf2 :) block with the other knight and protect the knight on b5 with the bishop.
Yasser I needed arrows!
Tal can calculate million moves ahead
For Game 2 exactly video at 36.41 minutes and my dear for Nf2.....here is the move
Nf2 Nf3+, Kd1 Nd4, Qc3 f3, Bd3 Qxh2, Nxh3 Qe2+, Bxe2 fxe2+, Ke1 exf1 =Q+ or Rxf1 checkmate.... No wonder Tal is well beyond your imaginations....Tal the greatest man.
Could the knight go to E6 after f4 ? Blocks black bishop protecting c8 and hits black queen. White queen c8 check. Time stamp 35.31
Hi Yasser, what book pray tell were you using? Thanks for all your kind and fastidious work to teach our noble art and science! All the best to you and the STL Chess club staff and members!
I too would be interested to know what book was used.
I think it the book is Ivan Sokolov's "Sacrifice and Initiative in Chess". It has both Tal-Geller 1958 and Tal-Lutikov 1964 games.
9:53 how is knight e7 check???
Matt Martin I think he meant (or said) knight c7+
Anyone in 2019 using the Elephant gambit? Lol
6:56 Se4!
At 13:15, why doesn't King just take knight on b7?
because than white bishop takes knight on C6 and check.. king move and bishop takes rook on A8 and white has better (Winning) pawn structure
Peter Samek peter is right
I am having a lot of trouble making out what he is saying. His soft voice sounds great, but he could enunciate a little more effectively. Well, guess you can't be good at everything :P
Maybe some closed captions in the future?
Qa5 looks much stronger than Qc5, unless you're playing against "The magician from Riga", of course.
16. Rhe1 is actually considered a blunder on stockfish... Why is he calling this a good move if he's a GM? Bishop takes bishop is the better move.
26:08 ... tell the truth.. you wanted to say "Challenge" ... "Accepted" :D
15:48 Did you really say Eersel? That's just some lame ass village 20km from here. But they got Dominator! :) Btw, the pronounciation was spot on, except for the accent
9:50 What?
he needs to stop going off camera to explain moves when he can use the board displayed
He's old school. No problem in using the OHP. Besides, we're not paying
+arsenalfanrichi what does paying have to do with the fact that it is distractive to go off camera every two seconds. Ben is better.
+RexNunc I don't have a problem with it so much. I'm looking at the board and listening to his voice.
Julian needs to let someone else answer a question or give an opinion. Surely others are raising their hand. Good work by Yasser as always.
Play Bishop x e6 !! Now Queen c5, Rook d7+, King f8, Rook f7+, King g8, Rook x f6 # I wonder why Tal didnt see this??Anyone see this in five years time here? Believe it , or not...I got this idea without chessprog or any other help.
16. Bxe6 even cooler
That is Turkish Gambit
I just used it in my game against a good opponent. Man this Elephant Opening is awesome! Check it out www.chess.com/live#g=2109166710
Just because Black didn't play the best defense doesn't mean that White (Tal) was good, or that his sacrifices were sound. Matter of fact, they weren't, and there were many points where Black could have achieved equality, but again, didn't play the best defensive moves. Tal really wasn't that great.
Lol. Staying at home and analizing all the moves vs playing on clock in front of audience its the same thing. Are you world champion? Tal was.
A
Blacks a queen up and lost... Haha
Geez too wordy?
Can you please stop saying Micheal tall
Tal missed a mate.
This thing is just LITTERED with errors of every kind. Bleeah.
He has an irritating manner of speech.