Trick Everyone with the ELEPHANT GAMBIT
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- I swindled my opponent with the Elephant Gambit.
Analyze the game: lichess.org/gB...
♟️Nakhmanson Gambit Chessable Course: www.chessable....
♟️Save 10% on Chessup products: playchessup.co...
MAIN CHANNEL: / jonathanschrantz
Twitch: / vampirechicken
Discord: / discord
Lichess: lichess.org/@/...
Support my content: paypal.me/jona...
Am only I wondering about why he didnt take the rook ?
Maybe he was afraid about leaving the queen on that spot if g3?
He thought there would be a mate but there wasn't a forced one
He completely missed it.
@@McHorsesCreations there is absolutely no threat to the queen. he just didnt see his queen can take the rook
@@rakhatthenut3815 probably, but also the engine recommend that move. Other moves are more forcing I guess
I don't understand why took the knight not the rook. If taking the rook, you are up a queen for two minor pieces, you paralyze the bishop and remaining rook and also will probably triangulate to win the knight anyway. Never mind, engine agrees with the check and taking the rook so be it!
Im like 1200 and I saw that I don't get how these 2000+ rated players just miss stuff like that
@@christobobbo5575 They know the position is winning no matter what, so they get "greedy" and look for a mating net rather than just gobbling up material. Taking the rook takes the queen somewhat out of play and makes a quick checkmate less likely.
The king is valiantly running away
Thanks!
Go Johnathan!
Love your Rapid Chess content! 👏Although it took me a while to discover there is already a playlist for that. Might be a good idea to feature it on the channel front page?
Doesn't seem like he was tricked by the elephant gambit, seems like he was tricked by a tactic that as a 2200 player he should have spent more time to find.
Good line, thanks!.
are you aware of the Tumbleweed variation of the kings gambit, Jonathan? e4 e5 f4 exf4 Kf2!? it is a very Schrantz-like gambit
3:08 And then isn’t there Bxe3, sacrificing the queen?
I just checked with stockfish and yes there is Bxe3. Originally I thought the move after Nxc6 was Bf4+ but, which wins 3 minor pieces for the queen, and according to the engine white has to give the queen back for a rook and a bishop, but Bxd4+ is even stronger.
Move no 13 . Q×b6 !?
Gambits are op
and what about attack on Israel and practicing shooting on israeli teenagers? Where is Allahamdullialah in that case????
Considering this quest to win with every single Gambit, I've just realized he will eventually have to get to the "Ross Gambit". (Which is 1.Nf3, e5)
It's fundamentally bad but for some reason a LOT of people have been playing it against me on lichess recently. I'd love to see if Jonathan can eke out any thematic concepts that make sense.
I don't know why so many people have been playing it. Either someone I don't know did a video about it or maybe someone has been using it against them with good success. I don't mind though. I win about 85-90% of the time when people play it against me. The only annoying part is I can't premove my second move anymore.
Yeah, I had someone try that against me the other day. I wonder why it's suddenly become so popular?
@@rolettuce9654 right? I have no idea. Best I can think of... I did get a couple bad games when I was pre-moving 2.e3. Black could then play …e4 and white gets a space disadvantage. So I learned the hard way not to pre-move the second move, which is a slight issue in bullet, but other than that it's a terrible gambit. I wish the site had the tools to trace back and see who started playing it and how or why it got so popular.
If you play Nf3 first move you shouldn't play chess.
@@itayn6422 May I ask why? It is move GM's use as well.
@@itayn6422 give me your lichess handle. I'll play you ten games where I get white and play 1. Nf3 every game. Draws count as a half point. If I win at least 8 points you promise to give up chess forever. If you win at least 6 then I'll give up chess forever. Are you in?