Renewables vs. Reliability

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 окт 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @AnneMB955
    @AnneMB955 25 дней назад

    This is a must see full video. Great interview.

  • @NutritionwithJudy
    @NutritionwithJudy  26 дней назад +2

    Renewable energy, often promoted as a sustainable solution, is unreliable without consistent backup.
    Without reliable energy sources like gas and coal, critical systems, from hospitals to factories, would face serious disruptions every time the sun doesn't shine or the wind doesn't blow.
    Are we being sold a lie? Or a subpar recommendation? And if so why?
    Make sure to watch the full episode with Dr. Zoë Harcombe.
    -
    #nutritionwithjudy #carnivorediet #carnivorecure #worldcarnivoretribe #worldcarnivoremonth #meatheals #energysecurity #reliablepower #sustainableenergy #renewables #powergrid #energysolutions #backupenergy #windandsolar #fossilfuels #criticalinfrastructure

    • @NutritionwithJudy
      @NutritionwithJudy  26 дней назад

      Full interview: ruclips.net/video/WteN7NzjJVg/видео.html

    • @cjbartoz
      @cjbartoz 19 дней назад

      The Experiment: Suddenly create some charge, and with pre-placed instruments watch (along a radial line from the created charge) the fields and potentials appear progressively at points along that radial, at the speed of light. And once the field and potential suddenly appear at a distant point, they thereafter steadily remain. This shows that a stream of continuous real observable EM energy does indeed pour from the charge, once it is made, continuously and unceasingly. Further, that free stream of EM energy does not "die out" so long as the charge remains intact. So the associated fields and potentials are continuously replenished, as they continuously spread radially outward at light speed.
      The Observation: Every charge freely pours out real EM energy in all directions, with no observable energy input.
      The Problem: Either the required nonobservable energy input must be identified or the energy conservation law is false.
      The Solution: The charge continuously absorbs virtual (subquantal) photon energy from the vacuum, coherently integrates it, and re-emits it as real observable photons.
      References:
      Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry T. E. Bearden (Dec. 2, 2003)
      T. E. Bearden, "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Proc. Congress 2000, St. Petersburg, Russia, Vol. 1, July 2000, p. 86-98. Also published in J. New Energy 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23.
      T. E. Bearden, Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles, Cheniere Press, 2002, “Chapter 3: Giant Negentropy, Dark Energy, Spiral Galaxies and Acceleration of the Expanding Universe.”
      M. W. Evans, T. E. Bearden, and A. Labounsky, "The Most General Form of the Vector Potential in Electrodynamics," Found. Phys. Lett., 15(3), June 2002, p. 245-261.
      The Source Charge Problem: Its Solution and Implications T. E. Bearden, Aug. 18, 2003

  • @witcheater
    @witcheater 26 дней назад +1

    I am 68+ years old and I have gone through so very many energy scare tactics. Add to that everything at one time or another was to end us all, and yet it at another time was going to save us all. What is being termed "renewable" is not technically, but the grids that are currently available in some areas (not only China) have the "battery centiric" concept being built into it all... as also seen in some states of Australia already. An area may not have the centralized batter farm, but "power walls" will eventually be adopted more and there will be, because of the greater energy grid, level out the demands. Yes, the fear is that industry will not have enough... but that has been said for more than the fifty-plus years of employment... all through all kinds of supposed crisises. Coal is probably a goner. Natural gas will still be available... sort of. As always, nuclear is a good idea poorly implemented. Yes, if the sun disappears in one place it will be in another still moving the tides of the atmosphere. Enough said for now.

  • @cardealz3108
    @cardealz3108 17 дней назад +1

    That's why you just simply need a battery storage. Problem solved

  • @wagmi_dude
    @wagmi_dude 26 дней назад +2

    Nuclear is the most reliable source of energy and the cleanest one. Compare how much nuclear waste there is vs wind turbines or photovoltaic waste.

  • @Poiema1234
    @Poiema1234 13 дней назад

    Judy, your complexion is amazing. Surely the carnivore diet is working. BTW, which skincare would you recommend? Thx.

  • @melodyyoung9640
    @melodyyoung9640 25 дней назад +1

    Silly misunderstanding of how energy works

  • @red-baitingswine8816
    @red-baitingswine8816 23 дня назад

    MCSFR, FLiBe!

  • @NoOctopuss
    @NoOctopuss 14 дней назад

    This lady hasn't heard of batteries??? Renewable energy is far more efficient as well. I bet she doesn't talk about all the steps that go into oil and gas being converted into electricity. I've seen both sides of the argument and I'm not convinced by the fossil fuel fear mongering.

  • @nmandowa
    @nmandowa 26 дней назад +1

    I guess this woman has never heard of batteries. What a ridiculous argument.

  • @Anndesch
    @Anndesch 26 дней назад

    EU 🤔

  • @EricaBassi99
    @EricaBassi99 24 дня назад +1

    But isn't the point that you need to use less?