The easiest test for generative AI is to add "cite your sources" to the end of your question. With a human you get a citation, which might be bad but at least it's a citation. The generative AIs respond with "According to my sources" followed by their ordinary answer.
it will just going to made up sources because it just doesn't actively go to the internet to assemble texts (at least the one that is not connected to the internet), it just predicting the next word in a sentence
Just keep in mind that their citations can some times be made up. So be keen. Bing seems to be doing a great job at it. Still, the responsibility lies with you to cross-check that the information is indeed in the sources because once again, it can sometimes get the details wrong.
Why you re-tuned the program's commencing music Zoe??... The earlier original music was so chilling to ears as it actually created more focus, enthusiasm and interest in further listening your program head-on, lady!! 😮
The "autocomplete" explanation at 2:30 is okay for describing models from a couple years ago, or giving people a very over-simplified idea of how all this started.. But that explanation cannot explain the level of reasoning the latest LLMs display, as well as the many other emergent behaviors we're beginning to see.
Great episode. Only one thing, the speaker lost me when she said that she believes China is heavily regulated in AI so we don’t have to worry about it, as if China has any regulations there can be trusted. If this is the mindset for our experts and regulators, we will then be far behind in this race. This tool was invented in the states, but unfortunately will be exploited elsewhere. This in my mind will come much sooner than singularity folks.
Hi I'm Ariful Islam leeton im software engineer and software developer and website development and Artificial intelligence and intelligence community United States
OMG this is so interesting! I never thought about AI being used for emotional or friendship purposes. It would be cool to have an AI friend to talk to when you're feeling lonely or need advice. But at the same time, I wonder if it's kind of weird to have a relationship with a machine, you know? And how long would it take to actually develop a bond with an AI? I guess it depends on how advanced the technology is and how realistic the AI can simulate emotions and conversation. It's definitely something to think about as AI becomes more and more integrated into our daily lives
So I view the copyright thing as a multiple sided issue. And technology copies is an issue that is Always going to be subject to time. An artist that physically picks up a pen or etc. Is no different than digital so that’s a fight that is timely
Can ChatGTP be programmed on reverse psychological parameters, in a way, to read it's own human level proficient logic.. in a pursuit to understand the process of its own dynamic approach as an end result, rather than, the actual results... in a way, to logically understand logical variances and deviations it is taking to bring in the automata instincts in itself that it registers to evolve as a better decision maker and grasper for the problems it is continuously solving over time and hence, becoming better than before? In other words, can a ChatGTP stand against two other ChatGTP facing each other wherein the first gives the result for any given query, the second targets for the logic of results efficiency of the first one while, the third targets for logic of the process and procedures taken to bring that result given by the first? In a way creating a loop which will help human beings profile the growth and evolutionary steps taken by ChatGPT to solve human queries and thereby, making us understand the limitations of the human thinking process that makes "the man" pop-up those questions and rely heavily on these tools.
My Question is.. how do I get rid off your reporter sitting under my phone? I have a metro PC phone. And Mr. Zulfiqar Ali BHUTTO grandson Michael ZULFIQER and his DIRECT TV via Real News Network bots hear all my convo.
I loved this format. taking questions from viewers is something you guys should do more of
The easiest test for generative AI is to add "cite your sources" to the end of your question. With a human you get a citation, which might be bad but at least it's a citation. The generative AIs respond with "According to my sources" followed by their ordinary answer.
Bing provides sources most of the time, and ChatGPT will soon have the ability to search the internet and provide references as well.
Try Bing. It always cites sources.
it will just going to made up sources because it just doesn't actively go to the internet to assemble texts (at least the one that is not connected to the internet), it just predicting the next word in a sentence
Just keep in mind that their citations can some times be made up. So be keen.
Bing seems to be doing a great job at it. Still, the responsibility lies with you to cross-check that the information is indeed in the sources because once again, it can sometimes get the details wrong.
ai makes work very easy
This one was a good episode. Keep it up wsj
Back to school with WSJ.
So very interesting.
This episode was great, thank you.
ai makes work very easy
The movie Her (2013) provides some thought-provoking ideas on the potential future of AI companionship.
Why you re-tuned the program's commencing music Zoe??... The earlier original music was so chilling to ears as it actually created more focus, enthusiasm and interest in further listening your program head-on, lady!! 😮
The "autocomplete" explanation at 2:30 is okay for describing models from a couple years ago, or giving people a very over-simplified idea of how all this started.. But that explanation cannot explain the level of reasoning the latest LLMs display, as well as the many other emergent behaviors we're beginning to see.
I'm john Conner. This must stop!!!!
Watch Matrix first John...
Could it be possible that all those questions were made by an AI faking voices to seem real?
Thank you so much
The AI bot recognizes your kindness ⬆️😂
😂
To know if students are copying Chat GPT, just ask them to write something IN CLASS.
Great episode. Only one thing, the speaker lost me when she said that she believes China is heavily regulated in AI so we don’t have to worry about it, as if China has any regulations there can be trusted. If this is the mindset for our experts and regulators, we will then be far behind in this race. This tool was invented in the states, but unfortunately will be exploited elsewhere. This in my mind will come much sooner than singularity folks.
Isn't befriending Chatbots like talking to yourself?
No, you are interacting with something that isn't you.
It is if you train it on your own text.
tried character ai?
Hi I'm Ariful Islam leeton im software engineer and software developer and website development and Artificial intelligence and intelligence community United States
Without AI.
Keep it going please!
OMG this is so interesting! I never thought about AI being used for emotional or friendship purposes. It would be cool to have an AI friend to talk to when you're feeling lonely or need advice. But at the same time, I wonder if it's kind of weird to have a relationship with a machine, you know? And how long would it take to actually develop a bond with an AI? I guess it depends on how advanced the technology is and how realistic the AI can simulate emotions and conversation. It's definitely something to think about as AI becomes more and more integrated into our daily lives
I wonder if chat bot can fool the Allen Turing test..are you a robot?..
GPT 4 has passed several turing tests. The issue now is that they dont know how to test it anymore.
So I view the copyright thing as a multiple sided issue. And technology copies is an issue that is Always going to be subject to time. An artist that physically picks up a pen or etc. Is no different than digital so that’s a fight that is timely
wsj, make one artificial intelligence program ask questions to another artificial intelligence program
If Ai have hallucination meaning he is Concious..
Can ChatGTP be programmed on reverse psychological parameters, in a way, to read it's own human level proficient logic.. in a pursuit to understand the process of its own dynamic approach as an end result, rather than, the actual results... in a way, to logically understand logical variances and deviations it is taking to bring in the automata instincts in itself that it registers to evolve as a better decision maker and grasper for the problems it is continuously solving over time and hence, becoming better than before? In other words, can a ChatGTP stand against two other ChatGTP facing each other wherein the first gives the result for any given query, the second targets for the logic of results efficiency of the first one while, the third targets for logic of the process and procedures taken to bring that result given by the first? In a way creating a loop which will help human beings profile the growth and evolutionary steps taken by ChatGPT to solve human queries and thereby, making us understand the limitations of the human thinking process that makes "the man" pop-up those questions and rely heavily on these tools.
What I wonder is if the chatbot is going to develop into a cat and mouse game or is a chatbot going to be like a literary assistant
Software and hardware
K Hao, please stop “uptalking”!
18:38
Authentiqie
My Question is.. how do I get rid off your reporter sitting under my phone? I have a metro PC phone. And Mr. Zulfiqar Ali BHUTTO grandson Michael ZULFIQER and his DIRECT TV via Real News Network bots hear all my convo.
🤖🚬 ☕☕☕
this is better off read in text than listened to... but whatever wsj wants to platform for the sheep they go with oh well thats sad
Train it to “follow our values”- well that’s dangerous.
And companionship/relationship with AI? Whew this is really something… 🫠