How does FN F2000 rifle work?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 янв 2018
- You may find this model in the program World of Guns:
Download links:
Steam: store.steampowered.com/app/262...
Mac AppStore: itunes.apple.com/us/app/world...
Google Play: play.google.com/store/apps/de...
Amazon: www.amazon.com/gp/mas/dl/andr...
App Store: itunes.apple.com/us/app/world... 
Развлечения
So with the F2000 and the P90, it seems like FN knows how to make a bullpup that is left handed friendly without having to convert the weapons
Yes)
That's why i fn love fn
Is the p90 even a bullpup? The magazine is on top of the rifle and not behind the trigger
@@Reupload-Kanal-Von-Lukas-Heil yeah. While the magazine is on top, the chamber is still behind the trigger which is the defining characteristic of bullpup weapons.
A good looking futuristic rifle. It was my favorite gun in MW2. Especially with her unique reflex-optic sight.
bro this thing was so underrated in mw2, especially with the suppressor
Same it’s recoil was as good as most guns in the game but I still used it
🤓🤓
"Good looking" is subjective. The stock looks like a wide plank, to me it's an ugly feature. Why not remove the bottom half? Does it provide better accuracy? Does it have a storage compartment?
So futuristic...it pretty much a upside down maxim gun
looks like an alien weapon
The alien weapon is H&K G11
It’s a design from fucking Halo games
@@idsfxtm5759 yes
It looks like a futuristic P90
Its the halo assault rifle if you squint hard enough
I remember wanting this gun so badly in battlefield 2
It was is battlefield spec ops, tho.
Had like 12,000 kills with it in BF3
This is so helpful for my school project. Thanks a lot!!
Hello FBI? Yeah this comment over here
Jason Blundell no bro i was told to design a gun alright 😂😂😂
@@yorukage9688 your school told you to design a gun? Things are getting even crazier 😂
@@jasonblundell7393 to answer u seriously i'm in a quite advanced artschool, so we're also learning about the functionality of certain objects such as lockers, guns, flashlights, bags, vehicles, airships, etc. So when we draw something not only we design the visual but also consider the functions. Hope that answers!
@@yorukage9688 that's interesting, I wish you good luck for your future! I was just kidding :)
Engineers: “How do you want it?”
FN: “Complexicated!”
How do you want it?
Yes.
Its not complex
So many armchair generals here. No, this gun is not complicated. It's just an AR-18 system in polymer housing that protects the internals from dust and dirt, which means it is more durable and has higher reliability than other weapons of this type. The shell ejection system and tunnel is not complex or unnecessary - it is a huge advantage for left-handed shooters because hot brass isn't hitting your face, this was some of the biggest problems with bullpup weapons back then and FN solved it brilliantly. Some bullpups have options of ejecting on the other side, but you must change it before, it takes few seconds but for example you can't use it when you need to change hands, for example leaning left in CQB - you switch the gun to other hand. Also the tunnel is almost impossible to clog or block or damage. It's all but a weakspot, it is basically idiotproof, you can't break it even if you wanted to. You people just have no idea how it's built but you're the first to criticize not knowing shit. All in all it's a very good rifle and it's a huge shame it didn't catch on, it's a great design. Just because it looks modern and unique doesn't mean it's unreliable or complicated. Slovenian army uses F2000 as their service rifle - they love it, and they used AK variant before so they have a great comparison and they know very damn well what a reliable gun is. But they don't talk shit about F2000 because they use it with great success. Ian from Forgotten Weapons also was under great impression of F2000 (or rather FS2000, the semi-auto version) and he handled hundreds of weapons, old and modern.
It is not an AR-18 operating system, Ian got that wrong (he does that sometimes). The F2000 uses a tappet system, which has some similarities to the short piston recoil system of the AR-18, but they certainly aren't the same.
@@ostiariusalpha You're right, thanks for clearing it up. However, can't it still be called an AR-18 system in the end? Tappet system works similarly to short stroke, and the overall system is similar. So overally it's more AR-18 than, say, M1 Carbine. Just how calling HK416 a modified AR-15 is not wrong, even though it uses different gas system which is a big change.
@@czwarty7878 The F2000 has an offset op rod, so even there it is more like its ancestor, the M1 Carbine, than the AR-18 and its centerline op rod. The HK can more fairly be called a hybrid of the AR-18 and AR-15 than trying to force some connection to FN's bullpup; the tappet and short piston recoil systems perform similar enough that you can call the F2000 more like a nephew to the AR-18, or perhaps a second cousin. A parallel to this relationship can be seen with the direct impingement systems of the Ljungmann and MAS-49 having related features, yet not being direct ancestors of, the AR-15's internal piston system.
@@ostiariusalpha sometimes when people say "it's an ar18 operating system" they're actually talking about the 7 lugs bolt... Which doesn't really means it's an ar18 but you get the idea.
Ian also said Steyr aug is ar18 like...he's not wrong at all
@@arielgarcia5065 Bolts are not operating systems, period. And Ian was in error about the AUG, he is well aware that he makes mistakes sometimes.
I rewatched this video 4 times to understand basically everything, it would be better if you told us, still it's awesome.
0:28. That casing detail though.
Thank you for the illustration.
This isn't really an illustration, it is more like a digital simulation.
the "Tactical Tuna" or "Tactical Yacht" rifle. But in a good way
This is the P90s big brother. Awesome weapon.
Well, technically little brother, since it's about 10 years younger 😝
What a beautiful fish!
Great animation
This is the thing I wanted to see since I saw this gun.
Amazing engineering
This was the futuristic laser gun looking guns i was waiting for as a child
Back to WolfTeam i'm frickin love this gun
How is the extraction of sleeves in this weapon?
Very cool
I love FN. These guns take "original concept" (or somewhat/mostly original) and go above and beyond.
Disassembly is a nightmare, absolutely impractical
One of the contenders for the NGSW rifle system is even more complicated. And it isn’t a bullpup.
interesante arma
Nice
Thanks for app
¡Yeah baby!
Now if only they could make a more complicated gun.
John Petrov Look at one of the contenders for the NGSW program.
P90
LOL that title reserved for Textron rifle
@@myusername3689 None of the NGSW weapons is really even all that complex. The program as a whole isn't doing much of anything that really jumps forward in weapon design at all. Plastic casings (with a steel base) instead of brass? Whoa! That's some space age shit right there!
Now, yes, I know, the PCT option is a bit more complex, but thats hardly all that new a concept, either. We've been working on PCT for a while now.
Well, it is a cheaper (to manufacture) copy of the TKB-022PM, which was x10 times more complex and interesting. Korobov was a goddamn genius, can't believe he was so far ahead of his time..
The round ejection is weird
It's actually pretty hot, firing off a few rounds, they either come out one at a time or 4-5 at a time and it's the most satisfying thing in the world.
TrashGaming agreed looks like a jam waiting to happen
it actually works pretty well, if you have ever shot or handled one of these rifles. every now and again a few casings will get kicked out, and tipping the gun down makes any loose ones just fall out. the cases will even get kicked out when the gun is at an upward angle. they do seem to be picky with ammo though
I actually had the chance to shoot it at a range. Jamming is a noticeable issue. It sometimes can't go through 30 rounds in under 2 jams. But my biggest gripe is its progressive trigger in full auto. You have to pull it hard and long to engage full auto. You can't expect to squeeze and drag the trigger because it will only fire one round (semi-auto mode) and won't allow you to pull all the way back.
Other than those issues, this gun is fun. Its look got me hooked in the first place, a bit less recoil than an M4, very light weight, and so comfortable to rest against the shoulder and cheek.
paul shi
does it have more range and better accuracy than a long rifle AR-15/A2/M16A4?
My Grail Gun, right there...
Beast .
the extraction and ejection on this rifle is nuts. Are double feeds and jams prevalent with the f2000?
Picture this weapon, but instead of a standard 5.56mm 30-round mag, imagine a P90 5.7mm magazine that has been “rolled up” like a snail shell or a tape measurer. The overall width with be very comfortable fitting under your armpit area, unlike a standard drum mag that is exceptionally wide. You would still get 50 rounds of armor piercing, low recoil, high rate of fire, BUT unlike a standard banana-shaped mag, it would be shorter relative to the chamber.
Sounds like the Calico magazines. Or do you mean vertical?
No gas cylinder means that rearming is done exploiting the recoil and no part of the gas energy is wasted to throw the shell out. Like a hand gun. So the kinetic energy should be around 30 percent more that conventional designs yes?
i like the music
FN when designing this gun: hmm, lets make aliens gun
Wow i love ths rifle
Because of this rifle save the left cartridge
탄피 줍줍할 필요 x
It doesn't
why retain the empty brass for a little bit but not until finished shooting?
The only thing I hate is the spent casing ejection system. Looks like a good way to have a bad malfunction by an ejection just as much or more than the autoloader system.
so cool 很好^_^
Only one problem because I am fan of ak 47 and Mp 5 so I believe in simplicity but f 2000 is to complex
But I like it
is this only bullpup that can shoot from both handside ?
No wonder why the ratio of firing and the amount of cartridge spits out is less than those being firing. So few actually still inside the gun
It holds round cases before ejection wow noice
Unpopular opinion its my favourite assault rifle and its literally been embedded in me from mw2 😅
What is the benefit of keeping the used shell cartridges instead of just ejecting it? Won't that increase the chances of jamming and breaking because of over complexity?
One of the problem of the bullpup design (having the magazine behind the trigger handle) is that the cartridges get ejected on the same level of the face, making it impossible to operate from the side where is the ejection. This way, instead, the casings get extracted from the front of the weapon, and that makes the weapon operable with a dominant left hand too.
No, bc the used shells are in a different section than the entire systen
It’s ment to be easely used for right hand and left hand use, so it hase a casing ejection barrel so left hand users don’t get burned by hot casings.
This degine is best
>a
>fucking
>fish
Still, great video. Love the game, too.
Overall I prefer the FAMAS Valorisé. But this. This is a brillant ambidextrus gun
I can use this as the Mississippi queen meme video
Music source please..
Please include Remington MSR in this simulator :') how do I vote for a particular gun?
i actually have this game and you need 1000 credits= 50 euros to suggest a gun that you know. And you would be glad to have it in this game. then if they aprove it will enter on votes section before being worked on to release it on the game
Iago97 DDCV thank you so much for the info :) I'm definitely gonna buy 1000 credits to suggest my fave rifle ;) But is it 100% guaranteed that they'll include the rifle I suggest? :/
Vivekananda Lengkong If they able to make it yes.
venator5 but what if they're not able to create the gun i suggest (which i've spent my money/credits on)? Will they return my money/credits? :/
Vivekananda Lengkong Yes they return as credits or you can suggest another gun.
Wonder if this thing has 9mm conversion kit
From where do you get the dimensions of each and ever part of these rifles to make such accurate 3d videos .... Can anyone pls answer?
It's an app call World of guns: gun dissassembly. It has over 200 different guns
Отличный аппарат
i need blue print of this gun
Kenapa selongsong peluru tidak langsung keluar? Apa fungsinya?
Storing a few empty cases above the barrel? That’s unique
What
Why would you store spent casing in the gun? Is shooting 1000rpm of 5.56 not hot enough already? Why let the brass keep the heat inside the gun?
Why does the trigger pack look almost exactly like an AUG trigger pack...?
They probably use Ctrl V Ctrl C
Me impresiona el ingenio del hombre para matar de desde lanzas hasta armas automáticas
Siempre se busca tener la ventajas.
Why was it designed to slide spent casings along a tube before front-ejecting? It has enough capacity to catch a half dozen casings before they spill onto the ground.
But what advantage does this offer? Is it a recoil compensator? A stealth feature to help conceal marksman positions?
It seems too complicated (and prone to jam) to be included just because of fashion preferences.
Ambidextry
The biggest problem with the bullpup is that if ur left handed, and fire from the left side, the casing will hit u on the cheek.
The only thing I just feel weird is why so many unused spaces. They could have cut some plastic underneath trigger group. The pistol grip can store some cleaning equipment.
It's a modular weapon - meant to accommodate all sorts of extra hardware options. Some of the add-ons replace or occupy the "unused spaces". I'm guessing they limited the built-in hardware to maximize compatibility with accessories - including many accessories designed by other manufacturers.
@@pwnmeisterage I think I saw some video after I commented this, that the cleaning kit was stored under the trigger pack. That hole is big enough to not use it. I love this gun even more now.
Music name?
0:48 what is that
How to remove the empty shell in the tube?
tilt the gun and it falls out
The most underrated rifle of the world, but in reality this rifle is fantastic, precision, reliability all is perfect (FN quality) its only defect is too modern, some countries have to copy its design.
Hans Strouf I think it’s the overall bulkier looking design that bullpups tend to have which throw people off.
❤❤❤
May I ask about the source of the soundtrack used in this video?
we bought it years ago ...www.digitaljuice.com/
@russian what the music title??
I really do not like the ejection system. Just asking to break. What happens when you have casings still inside it? What if they gunk up after buildup of residue?
You point the gun down, give it a jerk and they fall out, you don't keep them in the gun after you're finished shooting
Some spinter cell shit
Not me watching this vid because i will be called into the army 🤣
Czy to ma związek z p90
💞
Más lugares donde encasquillarse, no entiendo la ventaja de acumular los casquillos en una recamara superior, aumenta el peso, vuelve más complejo el mecanismo, la distancia entre la mira y el cañón es mayor siendo menos fiel, más riesgo de trabarse. No encuentro lo práctico, mejor un ak-74
The shells discharge out the front of the rifle
Why does it have that huge stock? What goes in there?
Trigger, and bolt spring mechanism
Do you really want empty casing in your rifle?
Can this device be dismantled and cleaned in the trenches after the battle under the snow and rain?
Yes.
All you need is a tarp and a cleaning kit
Yes , it is , sometimes , even easier to use in a trench because of the shell tube , which make stoppages simpler and easier to solve , also the gun is more accurate than a AK and , overall , more reliable , because it is a piston system and is a very sealed gun , meaning debris is hard to get in your gun , and if it does , well , you just remove the mag , move the charging handle , and put the mag in , with an AK , it could be harder to solve
Compared to M4, this feels more troublesome to maintain？？？
You have twice the complexity, twice the cost, twice the difficulty when cleaning compared to any other roller-delayed blowback rifle just so that the brass cases can eject less reliably?
They eject reliably, it's done so that brass won't hit you in the face if you're shooting it left handed. This is good for left handed shooter obviously but also for right handers when they have to switch shooting grip during CQC.
😊
starship trooper weapon 😁
indonesia menyapa
I hate that 70% of the stock is actually hollow
Интересная пушка
Did any major Army ever adopt this for front line use or is it more of a curio like the jackhammer shotgun.
Slovenian army
Also Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and special forces in Belgium, Croatia, India, Peru, Poland, and Spain. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_F2000#Users
It’s used by the Ukrainian army, but I think not in large numbers
Parece o lapa brasileiro .
How I see the F2000: I am calm *takes a deep breath* WHAT SORCERY IS THIS!
Fn2000 lore
What is this used for?
Do you mean program or FN F2000 ?
i dont understand
why does tge gun keep some empty cartriadge in the gun
that will just add weight and complexity
not convinient
а для чего этот склад пустых гильз?
ok
why is it even holding the empty shells like that
Its slowes them down i think, so that they dont just fly out and possibly hit the user
Mine has a basement with a pool table.
Intentional design.
bonk
I’d rather a P90 tbh, no complicated ejection tunnel, ergonomically very smooth, nothing to catch on things, good cyclic rof, & shells eject out the bottom. Truly ambidextrous.
This fires full on rifle cartridges, though. They are considerably longer than 5.7mm FN, and it would thus be harder to make a rifle in 5.56 with a P-90 style mag, where rounds are stored laterally.
David Ellis never the less, the 5.7 x 28 is an effective round, and the pistol has an almost equivalent muzzle velocity. One round for both weapons.
@@paulcollyer801 Whoa, definitely not. 5.7 is absolutely not ballistically comparable to 5.56.
David Ellis didn’t say they were comparable, just said the 5.7 28 was effective. Yes, the NATO 5.56 is a faster round, but bigger is why NATO dropped from a 7.62 to 5.56, more ammo for the weight. All swings and roundabouts.
@@paulcollyer801 Yeah, just double checked. A US M-855A1 FMJBT fired from an M-4A1 sends a 62 grain (4.02 gram) projectile at about 910 meters per second, so it carries 1,664 Joules at the muzzle.
Fired from a P-90, the 5.7x28mm SS-190 is a 31 grain (2.01 gram) projectile traveling at 715 meters per second and thus is carrying just 534 Joules at the muzzle. That's also in a slightly fatter, considerably lighter package than M-855A1, so aerodynamics will suffer, meaning what is already inferior performance to 5.56mm will only drop off more rapidly with distance.
So, no, *really* not a suitable round to fill the shoes of 5.56.
Didnt know F2000 save her last bullet to the top and then the bullet on the top will get out
background music omg
Yeah im looking for it too. Give me the source if you found it ok
Like
изобретение велосипеда.