However, I have a question. Don't you think that quantum contextuality is different from classical contextuality? I mean change of context in a quantum setting is fundamentally different from change in context in a classical setting, and that is what allows for existence of non-contextual classical attributes? In other words, your identity cards are fundamentally different? I am thinking from the point of emergence of the classical description from the underlying quantum description. Probably when we talk about a classical non-contextual property, in quantum sense the contextuality has already been determined - either by the environment (Zurek's view), or, may be by some kind of coarse graining inbuilt in the question we ask in the classical world? What do you think :)?
Hi Alexia, I enjoyed your talk a lot, and I appreciate your view towards science!
However, I have a question. Don't you think that quantum contextuality is different from classical contextuality? I mean change of context in a quantum setting is fundamentally different from change in context in a classical setting, and that is what allows for existence of non-contextual classical attributes? In other words, your identity cards are fundamentally different? I am thinking from the point of emergence of the classical description from the underlying quantum description. Probably when we talk about a classical non-contextual property, in quantum sense the contextuality has already been determined - either by the environment (Zurek's view), or, may be by some kind of coarse graining inbuilt in the question we ask in the classical world? What do you think :)?