Amazing interpretation! I love the conviction with which he speaks. This comes with extensive experience delving deeper into all kinds of texts from umpteen traditions of India
There was no need to make fun of that girl you know.....it was a genuine query from a genuine mind. With knowledge you should become humble, not arrogant.....................
Oh yeah, be taught to cultivate this piety of selflessness as pure love, especially by the guru or swami to a young woman inspired to go to India in the early 70s to seek spiritual awakening and enlightenment. India was my first experience of travelling from a safe and predictable environment to an exotic, mystical infinity where the gods were alive on every lips, in every story and every street. KI was completely mesmerized since my first evening on the big open roof terrace in Madras. There I watched amazed as the huge balls of an enormous full moon met vis-a-vis in the sky before my very eyes. India cast me in a magic spell. My existence beautifully connected to Namaste, Om, Shanti, meditation... Others were in India with their dreams, realities, hippies, love, relationship, money and going naked on Arjuna beach in Goa. For us young Malaysians, It was a big thing to travel to India in 1973... esp when I found myself travelling solo Things happened in India. That bright moonlit night ina cove somewhere on Calangut beach, a young Indian lad with shiny dark skin and enormous eyes called Vishnu joined Joseph, my English guide and protector. He spoke very well and the three of us talked long into the night...about our beliefs in social justice, racism, equality, pure love like the love tested on us by he gods. Joseph started to doze off... Vishnu suddenly asked me, "Will you kissy me?" I was shocked and didn't answer. Of course I couldn't kiss him. He began to complain he didn't believe in pure love, equality, antiracism etc making me feel very guilty, like a hypocrite. I struggled thinking I should kiss him as he's equal to Joseph nd I really believe in love and peace... that I spoke truly and I was not a hypocrite... but I couldn't. He mumbled something and walked off. That made me ponder about what I should have done... whatever, I was glad I stood my ground.
Sir, I have problems with word mythology because we have many proofs about Krishna and Ram presence in India...like Rameshwaram, bridge joining Lanka , krishnapuram in Gujrat sea.
we have a proof of mohammed also. but can we prove that he was prophet? Mythology is inspired from reality but it does not reflect reality/history in the form of hard facts in the complete sense. For example the mahabharata war lasted for 18 days ( 1+8=9). kauravas had 11 troops while pandavas had 7(spiritual no.) troops. total =11+7=18 (again divisble by 9). In the geeta, human is described to have nava dwara (9 doors). Dont u think that above data represents more of a metaphor than hard facts. Its a beautiful poetry, so pls dont pollute with argument whether its history or not.
@@vishalahuja2136 you have no knowledge about what you speaking... Go learn about word meaning mythology.. we have krishna and rama birth timinings in mythologies there is no such great significance to the names..!!!
@@sk-pg8zd krishna means kala/dark. In dwapara yuga, people became corrupt and abuse/misuse Rules. Also it might imply, God can even exist in dark-complexed people. This thinking was promoted due to the racism. Also, may be becoz after his death kala-yug starts. The word, "Rama" comes from yogic anatomy of manipura chakra/solar plexes, whose sound is Ram...Hence Rama represents doer's energy.
@@vishalahuja2136 Vishal bhai, you are questioning if Mohammad was a prophet. Hinduism claims Sri Ram and Krishna were avatars of Vishnu without presenting any evidence in the last 5000+ years. Why? Is it a FALSE CLAIM? Hinduism claims to believe and follow "Ahinsha parmo dharma while worshiping KATILS like Sri Ram, Krishna, and Shiva. Ramayan narrates that Sri Ram, in rage and revenge, murdered Ravan and Khumbhkaran for Sita haran with the help of a monkey, Hanuman, that failed to pluck out a Sanjivini booty from Dorangiri parvat, yet the monkey broke apart the parvat. LOL. Monkeys, including Hanuman, evolved with a tail and NO wings necessary to fly; still, Ramayan narrated that Hanuman flew across Bharat carrying the parvat to light a fire with its flaming tail to Lanka to burn the inhabitants to death for KATIL Ram, thus committing the world's first genocide.
Can anyone tell me of any attempt by anyone in history to re-tell the holy books of any other belief system Then why is he trying to retell my books my tradition. Is there a need for it. If I don’t like I will not subscribe to it but I won’t interpret it my way.
Sir, I think Shiv Shakti is ultimate because any thing we do bad or good has its returns, has some desire or lust in bad case, but if you do nothing there is no favours or opposition..so ideal in science and ideal in real life is impossible
Devdutt : Krishna didn't say it. A poet said it. Me : !!? Doesn't our understanding of Krishna, also come from a poet. My version of Krishna is the Krishna, the rest is just poetry.
when he(Devdutt) said that the poet said it, he implied( without disrespecting) that, if poet approaches life with assumption of ahankara in the heart, then he will focus on comparisons. Hence, that's the poet bias behind the story of comparison. So Hari singh dinkar, the poet, is not the yogi. That does not mean he is bad or good person. It just implies that he has his own world view. While the bhagwata purana was composed by Ved vyasa and his disciples. They led the life of household and also that of yogi. Spirituality/life of yogi is opposite of materialism. It teaches you what is beyond hunger and insecurity, product of which includes ahankara. Idea of krushna is the idea of ved vyas. The concept of God as krushna, postulated through the lens of ved vyas. If krushna is purna purusha, the complete whole, then nobody is to be compared with, hence atma gyaan becomes the area of focus, rather than ahankara.
he kept step-mother and and foster mother in the same basket becoz in both the cases she was not his biological mother. He was implying that even if you are not biological mother, still your psychological love can remain same.
Krsna atma gyan tha isliye wo rath ko haaka. Bheem,yudhistir,nakul,sahadev kyu nahi sarathi banay? Kyu rathi hi banay? That answers why karan became maharathi.he was son of Sun.Had duryodhan asked him to become his sarathi and fight together,he would have done it.krsna-arjun and duryodhan-karan are mirror images.karan was willing to do anything for duryodhan just as krsna was willing for arjun.
Coz without having disparity one cannot realize parity. Therefore for us, the existence of God theory only possible when we get our existence as human.
@@SnehaGupta-tj7by nope. Krishna was the king of Dwarka(a city made and destroyed by devas). In Jain mythology he was a vasudeva and vasudevas are king of 3 khanda( chakrawarthis are king of 12 khanda) where as their elder half brother are called Baldeva, so Balram were a Baldeva and Baldevas are non violent. Same in case of Ramayana, Lakshman were a vasudeva and Ram were a Baldeva. Also it's a characteristic of Vasudeva to have a sudarshan chakra and are of violent nature because they have to fight prati vasudeva - Jarasand and Ravana in case of Krisna and Lakshmana respectively.
What if earnings are poor,then also upbringing of children will be bad.duryodhan was a pampered child of drithrasthra and his wife. Drithrashtra himself was playing nepotism to ensure that Duryodhana became the king and not the pandavas. He was envious of Pandu. Dhrithrashtra tried to kill Bhima under the pretext of embracing him,but krsna put a putla in front of him which got smashed.
Sir, from mughal tent you r speaking about Krishna and ram, ram has got his home after long struggle, so what you say about Krishna home case going on in court...is it right or wrong
Imp h ki Kya hum Mai Krishna and ram ka bhav aaya. Agar aagaya toh hum sab Mai ram aur Krishna milega. Ram aur Krishna ek human avatar the iska Matlab yeh h ki hum sab Mai ram or Krishna banne ka potential h. Agar Krishna hote toh unhe koi farak nahi padta ki wha majjid h ya mandir kyu ki unne Atma Gyan h Matlab duniya mandir banaye ya na banaye unhe koi farak nahi padta.
Para does not mean the other. It means beyond the mind and body.when u go beyond the mind body,you identify with your atma as Self and not identify with mind body. That is Atmagyan. Atmagyan separates the real from the relative.in the relative world there is karma, there is right and wrong,action and reaction, raag and dwesh, all duality.an atmagyani lives in the relative without being involved in it, meaning he watches himself in the third person. The panda va are the five senses, dhravpati is the prakruti( physical body) and Krishna is the Atma.
Lekin ye hotha nahi.wo bhaav nahi hotha bhog denay aur prasad chakthay samaye.ekdam mechanical ho gaya hai,mindful nahi hai kyuki samaj may hi nai aatha.prasad khaya hai bhog chadaya hai lekin kuch uss prakriya ya procedure say connect nahi kar paaya. Aajkal prasad tho online may mil jatha hai.
Mr.देवदत्त पट्टनायक, मुझे समझ नही आ रहा है की आप पर हंस पडू या कुछ और करूं 😂. It's your interpretation which doesn't mean acceptable by all, especially those who are really scolars & knowledgeable. You are just a story teller of modern times. I really laughed on you listening your interpretation on Yashoda & Radha which came from Yashodhara. Your fame doesn't mean that you are always correct and on the name of freedom of speech you are saying unacceptable things & corrupting the youth minds.
No matter how Krishna is presented, none can forget he started as a neighborhood chore stealing makhan, lusting at the women bathing at the Yamuna ghats, Hiding their clothes to lust longer at their wet, partially nude bodies like a pervert. Krishna intervened in the Mahabharath ydh, encouraging Arjun to do his dharma as a Kshatriya and personally assisting as the charioteer in mass murdering 100 Kauravas to resolve their family feud over the inheritance. His life shows him as a morally reprehensible person. Satyemeva Jayete.
Krsna was,a king maker. He ensured that pandavas ruled and not kauravas.he ensured yudhistir became the king. No our society is not based upon krsnas atma gyan.even people who have PhD in bhagawad gita and bhagawatam are not atma gyanis. Wo seerf atma gyan ka dukaan chalata hai. Jaise koi fortune teller jisko khud ka fortune patha nai.
Krsna could have told karna earlier that....thu pandu putra hai.but he revealed it the night before the battle. Humko aisa krsna kuch kuch thagi lagtha hai. Karan ka poora achcha karam churaatha hai, uska sonay ka daath bhi cheentha hai.aisay kiye bina bhi maar saktay thay. Daanveer honay ka nai. Atma gyani log cho........ya bana dalenga.
I do not agree with patnayak. Para is not the other,Para is beyond mind& body, beyond the ego . When u get para Gyan, you get Atmagyan.atmagyan is realisation of true Self.The absolute Truth is the real and the worldly truth is the relative.In the relative world,we have action and reaction, karma, right wrong.etc.In the real, there is no judgement, just pure bliss.Patnayak is viewing our scriptures from an intellectual perspective, but they can only be truly explained by a self realised guru
If there was too many gods, human would have been in different shapes as per their personal choice, but we human is in shape, why? When we make something like house or vehicles all engineers make it differently rather than making one model, the same model, why? So I mean to say that if there were too many gods, they would have been made this world differently in different shapes, but not happened like that, because we all have one God like us in our shapes. Laxmi is having many hands, Kali is having many hands and heads. Shiva is having snakes on his neck, but we do not keep snakes in our home, why? Hanuman is a monkey shaped. Anyone today believe that he was able to speak with his god Ram? 10 Headed gods, Sun god, Moon god, snake god, Cow god, Animal gods, Calf god. All these are gods and goddess of human? Gods are not able to communicate with sounds like us, Can they hear our supplications? Are they really help us in all our matters? Please think.
Did you read Mahabharata?? It is 10 volume of 300-700 pages each.... First read it in its entirety then talk about it... Idiot 2 minutes noodles generation or tiktok generation who don't have ability to read voluminous Mahabharata should not be talking about it based on their cursory or head ideas of Mahabharata. Idiots.
Fuck. Their should be situation to be I wife 5 husband. It still practice in Himalayas in India Nepal Pakistan. Not just happen. But now we can avoid such practice.
In other videos of devdutt , he elaborated that every yuga has different contums and beliefs. It should not be looked as right or wrong. Find the atmgyan so that u can be liberated though maya.
Why Krishna was dead? Where he is now existed? Or Krishna permanently dead? Which holy book of Hinduism authentic? Is the creation was explained in it? What about the first human? Of course population was gradually increased in the world, everyone knows. Then who were the first parent? How was the chronicle of generations explained in Hindu Holy Book? Is there any mention of the rain and rainbow? How it mentioned about the animals and vegetation? Why Hinduism not spread in the world first before Christianity? Why all the inventions made by Jews and Christians and why not Hindus and Muslims? Every thing that we use today invented by Jews or Christians. Is it true? Then why so? Hindu gods are not knowledgeable? Do you believe Shiva is the Pharaoh who loved snakes? His figure and photos are depicted as a snake, His headscarf depicts as the head of a snake, chin as the body of a snake. His hair on his head depicts a whole snake, Bunch of his head hair that pandits today keep on their head, what it means other than a snake? Pharaoh was a pandit as today’s Pandits who perform Pooja and rituals like Pharaoh did in Mishr (Egypt) in front of a statue god, Sun god and other creation of this world. Pharaoh fought war on chariots like Krishna and Pandavas that resembles in Mahabharata war. I have so many such questions.
Sir, many times from childhood I had many questions like you, you studied and ellaborated but again I can say the depth of Hindu religion is not achieved even you will be wrong in further future
Dev Dutt Patnaik is one of the biggest frauds.He has no clue of Bharath’s puranas, and no knowledge of Sanskrit. Pathetic he is treated as an ‘expert’.
Jo atma gyan ka dandha chala rahay hai wo apna ahankaar ko suppress kiya huva hai.isliye ek false belief hai ki wo atma gyani hai. Ya soul realized hai.unkay paas kuch information hai.realized souls nahi hai. Atma ko bhagwan bhi bola jatha hai.aaj kal bhagwan sabsay tej biknay waala consumer item hai aur uskay ird gird kayi aur dandha fann fana raha hai.
Atma gyan duniya may sahi mayno may kithnay logo ko praapt hai ? Who are so to say living atma gyanis? Atma ka intellectual understanding hi honga, bass aur kuch nahi.
Amazing interpretation! I love the conviction with which he speaks. This comes with extensive experience delving deeper into all kinds of texts from umpteen traditions of India
Mukut pehenne se Raja nahin hota..
Joh dusron ke liye chinta karta hai, woh Raja hota hai👏❤️
মুকুট পেহেনে সে রাজা নেহী হোতা
যো দর্শন কে লিয়ে চিন্তা করতা হ্যায় ওহ্ রাজা হোতা হ্যায়
Shri Dev Dutt Patnaik ji, as usual, you are simply enlightening..Your previous Avatar w/o a beard was more enchantingn graceful..
There was no need to make fun of that girl you know.....it was a genuine query from a genuine mind. With knowledge you should become humble, not arrogant.....................
One should ask this to a scholar of Vedanta ...he is into mythology😅
I think he didn’t understand the whole question. He stuck to her first sentence
Watching at 01:45am blessed
2:07 am right now and at 11 min into the video as of writing.
BAHUT sundar dhanyawad aur subhkamnai
Very very wonderful story by Devdutt sir
Infinity has no gender no agenda only love ,giving love without asking
😍
Oh yeah, be taught to cultivate this piety of selflessness as pure love, especially by the guru or swami
to a young woman inspired to go to India in the early 70s to seek spiritual awakening and enlightenment.
India was my first experience of travelling from a safe and predictable environment to an exotic, mystical infinity where the gods were alive on every lips, in every story and every street.
KI was completely mesmerized since my first evening on the big open roof terrace in Madras. There I watched amazed as the huge balls of an enormous full moon met vis-a-vis in the sky before my very eyes. India cast me in a magic spell. My
existence beautifully connected to Namaste, Om, Shanti, meditation...
Others were in India with their dreams, realities, hippies, love, relationship, money and going naked on Arjuna beach in Goa.
For us young Malaysians, It was a big thing to travel to India in 1973... esp when I found myself travelling solo
Things happened in India. That bright moonlit night ina cove somewhere on Calangut beach, a young Indian lad with shiny dark skin and enormous eyes called Vishnu joined Joseph, my English guide and protector. He spoke very well and the three of us talked long into the night...about our beliefs in social justice, racism, equality, pure love like the love tested on us by he gods. Joseph started to doze off... Vishnu suddenly asked me, "Will you kissy me?"
I was shocked and didn't answer. Of course I couldn't kiss him. He began to complain he didn't believe in pure love, equality, antiracism etc making me feel very guilty, like a hypocrite. I struggled thinking I should kiss him as he's equal to Joseph nd I really believe in love and peace... that I spoke truly and I was not a hypocrite... but I couldn't. He mumbled something and walked off. That made me ponder about what I should have done... whatever, I was glad I stood my ground.
Always new...awesome way to look at things but kinda difficult to do....
Anyway try to do
Excellent session ❤❤
I did not just blink my eyes once in this session wonderful...
Listening to this CONMAN Devdutt????
@mooshindia you are also listening right???
The most well read, well informed and unbiased Mythologist and Historian in India. Salute to you Devdutt Sir🙏
28:09 Ram cried , now ok feminist.
God so much moving stuff in this... especially the comparison of Karna and Krishna...
He has the real knowledge of indian spiritual knowledge
Sir, I have problems with word mythology because we have many proofs about Krishna and Ram presence in India...like Rameshwaram, bridge joining Lanka , krishnapuram in Gujrat sea.
we have a proof of mohammed also. but can we prove that he was prophet?
Mythology is inspired from reality but it does not reflect reality/history in the form of hard facts in the complete sense.
For example the mahabharata war lasted for 18 days ( 1+8=9). kauravas had 11 troops while pandavas had 7(spiritual no.) troops. total =11+7=18 (again divisble by 9). In the geeta, human is described to have nava dwara (9 doors).
Dont u think that above data represents more of a metaphor than hard facts. Its a beautiful poetry, so pls dont pollute with argument whether its history or not.
@@vishalahuja2136 you have no knowledge about what you speaking... Go learn about word meaning mythology.. we have krishna and rama birth timinings in mythologies there is no such great significance to the names..!!!
@@sk-pg8zd krishna means kala/dark. In dwapara yuga, people became corrupt and abuse/misuse Rules. Also it might imply, God can even exist in dark-complexed people. This thinking was promoted due to the racism. Also, may be becoz after his death kala-yug starts.
The word, "Rama" comes from yogic anatomy of manipura chakra/solar plexes, whose sound is Ram...Hence Rama represents doer's energy.
@@vishalahuja2136 Vishal bhai, you are questioning if Mohammad was a prophet. Hinduism claims Sri Ram and Krishna were avatars of Vishnu without presenting any evidence in the last 5000+ years. Why? Is it a FALSE CLAIM? Hinduism claims to believe and follow "Ahinsha parmo dharma while worshiping KATILS like Sri Ram, Krishna, and Shiva. Ramayan narrates that Sri Ram, in rage and revenge, murdered Ravan and Khumbhkaran for Sita haran with the help of a monkey, Hanuman, that failed to pluck out a Sanjivini booty from Dorangiri parvat, yet the monkey broke apart the parvat. LOL. Monkeys, including Hanuman, evolved with a tail and NO wings necessary to fly; still, Ramayan narrated that Hanuman flew across Bharat carrying the parvat to light a fire with its flaming tail to Lanka to burn the inhabitants to death for KATIL Ram, thus committing the world's first genocide.
@@sk-pg8zd yeah exactly timings are registered in mythologies, not history
Can anyone tell me of any attempt by anyone in history to re-tell the holy books of any other belief system
Then why is he trying to retell my books my tradition. Is there a need for it. If I don’t like I will not subscribe to it but I won’t interpret it my way.
Tons of love tons of insight thank you
Sir, I think Shiv Shakti is ultimate because any thing we do bad or good has its returns, has some desire or lust in bad case, but if you do nothing there is no favours or opposition..so ideal in science and ideal in real life is impossible
Superb 👍👍👍
Devdutt : Krishna didn't say it. A poet said it.
Me : !!? Doesn't our understanding of Krishna, also come from a poet.
My version of Krishna is the Krishna, the rest is just poetry.
when he(Devdutt) said that the poet said it, he implied( without disrespecting) that, if poet approaches life with assumption of ahankara in the heart, then he will focus on comparisons. Hence, that's the poet bias behind the story of comparison. So Hari singh dinkar, the poet, is not the yogi. That does not mean he is bad or good person. It just implies that he has his own world view.
While the bhagwata purana was composed by Ved vyasa and his disciples. They led the life of household and also that of yogi. Spirituality/life of yogi is opposite of materialism. It teaches you what is beyond hunger and insecurity, product of which includes ahankara.
Idea of krushna is the idea of ved vyas. The concept of God as krushna, postulated through the lens of ved vyas. If krushna is purna purusha, the complete whole, then nobody is to be compared with, hence atma gyaan becomes the area of focus, rather than ahankara.
@@vishalahuja2136beautifully explained 👏
33:45 Hilarious!
Best mythology storyteller ever !
Yes 🙏🏻
Very interesting
Yashoda wasn’t Krishnas step mother, she was his foster mother.
he kept step-mother and and foster mother in the same basket becoz in both the cases she was not his biological mother. He was implying that even if you are not biological mother, still your psychological love can remain same.
,,,@@vishalahuja2136 What was the name of Krishna's biological mother? Thanks.
@@prosantomukerji3931 itna to bhhai google krle... kitna alas h aapmen
@@prosantomukerji3931 shrimati devki ju
Everyone is so wicked faced here crowned with the most unique frowns
Thanks for teaching lesson to so cold karna bhagat
Atma gyan ka capsule roop may miltha hai kya.
What song did he play
Mohe panghat pe... As he was talking about movie mughal e Azam..royal court.. There is only this song of krishna n Radha.
The best line Krishna never said karna is Better the poet said remember always
Krsna atma gyan tha isliye wo rath ko haaka. Bheem,yudhistir,nakul,sahadev kyu nahi sarathi banay? Kyu rathi hi banay? That answers why karan became maharathi.he was son of Sun.Had duryodhan asked him to become his sarathi and fight together,he would have done it.krsna-arjun and duryodhan-karan are mirror images.karan was willing to do anything for duryodhan just as krsna was willing for arjun.
why did you mute the song?
Copyright issue
Yashoda step mother or foster mother?
Sir, if infinity has no gender then why not only Shyam or Shyama why both cause this is fact that world all creature have both gender
Coz without having disparity one cannot realize parity. Therefore for us, the existence of God theory only possible when we get our existence as human.
18:20 Krishna were also king. They were king of 3 khands and hence had a sudarshan chakra.
He was not. Balram is the elder brother so he was the king while Krishna was sort of a caretaker or protector
@@SnehaGupta-tj7by nope. Krishna was the king of Dwarka(a city made and destroyed by devas). In Jain mythology he was a vasudeva and vasudevas are king of 3 khanda( chakrawarthis are king of 12 khanda) where as their elder half brother are called Baldeva, so Balram were a Baldeva and Baldevas are non violent. Same in case of Ramayana, Lakshman were a vasudeva and Ram were a Baldeva. Also it's a characteristic of Vasudeva to have a sudarshan chakra and are of violent nature because they have to fight prati vasudeva - Jarasand and Ravana in case of Krisna and Lakshmana respectively.
😂 awesome
What was Song?
listen again... and pay attention this time
Everybody knew that mahabharat yudh was fixed.Everybody knew that pandavas will win.
He is obviously frustrated with everything in the system. But we should tried to ignore the sarcasm in his storytelling and focus on the content.
Those women values are different from modern values that women are endowed with.
What if earnings are poor,then also upbringing of children will be bad.duryodhan was a pampered child of drithrasthra and his wife. Drithrashtra himself was playing nepotism to ensure that Duryodhana became the king and not the pandavas. He was envious of Pandu. Dhrithrashtra tried to kill Bhima under the pretext of embracing him,but krsna put a putla in front of him which got smashed.
the song i think is from mughl e azam
It's all Mythology . Under him this is feel like sarcastic
Krsna nay bola tha Arjun say
Na pyar jatha dushman say
Aur Yudh karr
Prem karnay ko kaha bola?
Ha prem say duryodhan ko samjaya tha ki yudh math kar.
Sir, from mughal tent you r speaking about Krishna and ram, ram has got his home after long struggle, so what you say about Krishna home case going on in court...is it right or wrong
Imp h ki Kya hum Mai Krishna and ram ka bhav aaya. Agar aagaya toh hum sab Mai ram aur Krishna milega. Ram aur Krishna ek human avatar the iska Matlab yeh h ki hum sab Mai ram or Krishna banne ka potential h. Agar Krishna hote toh unhe koi farak nahi padta ki wha majjid h ya mandir kyu ki unne Atma Gyan h Matlab duniya mandir banaye ya na banaye unhe koi farak nahi padta.
@@VivekSingh-pu1im I think the Muhammad in me is arising now.. 😂
Para is other than you and those who don't understand this basic truth is has to undergo self realisation!
Para does not mean the other. It means beyond the mind and body.when u go beyond the mind body,you identify with your atma as Self and not identify with mind body. That is Atmagyan. Atmagyan separates the real from the relative.in the relative world there is karma, there is right and wrong,action and reaction, raag and dwesh, all duality.an atmagyani lives in the relative without being involved in it, meaning he watches himself in the third person. The panda va are the five senses, dhravpati is the prakruti( physical body) and Krishna is the Atma.
Lekin ye hotha nahi.wo bhaav nahi hotha bhog denay aur prasad chakthay samaye.ekdam mechanical ho gaya hai,mindful nahi hai kyuki samaj may hi nai aatha.prasad khaya hai bhog chadaya hai lekin kuch uss prakriya ya procedure say connect nahi kar paaya. Aajkal prasad tho online may mil jatha hai.
Why Indian god's have weapons in one of their hands.?
Mr.देवदत्त पट्टनायक, मुझे समझ नही आ रहा है की आप पर हंस पडू या कुछ और करूं 😂. It's your interpretation which doesn't mean acceptable by all, especially those who are really scolars & knowledgeable. You are just a story teller of modern times. I really laughed on you listening your interpretation on Yashoda & Radha which came from Yashodhara. Your fame doesn't mean that you are always correct and on the name of freedom of speech you are saying unacceptable things & corrupting the youth minds.
No matter how Krishna is presented, none can forget he started as a neighborhood chore stealing makhan, lusting at the women bathing at the Yamuna ghats, Hiding their clothes to lust longer at their wet, partially nude bodies like a pervert. Krishna intervened in the Mahabharath ydh, encouraging Arjun to do his dharma as a Kshatriya and personally assisting as the charioteer in mass murdering 100 Kauravas to resolve their family feud over the inheritance. His life shows him as a morally reprehensible person. Satyemeva Jayete.
Chutiye hopes you get converted soon.
37:00 koi kata head bol skta h ?
Too lengthy an introduction
Krsna was,a king maker. He ensured that pandavas ruled and not kauravas.he ensured yudhistir became the king. No our society is not based upon krsnas atma gyan.even people who have PhD in bhagawad gita and bhagawatam are not atma gyanis. Wo seerf atma gyan ka dukaan chalata hai. Jaise koi fortune teller jisko khud ka fortune patha nai.
Yashoda and Radha are years before Buddha..why deriving them from yashodhra Buddha wife, it's reverse
👍
Krsna could have told karna earlier that....thu pandu putra hai.but he revealed it the night before the battle. Humko aisa krsna kuch kuch thagi lagtha hai. Karan ka poora achcha karam churaatha hai, uska sonay ka daath bhi cheentha hai.aisay kiye bina bhi maar saktay thay. Daanveer honay ka nai. Atma gyani log cho........ya bana dalenga.
I do not agree with patnayak. Para is not the other,Para is beyond mind& body, beyond the ego . When u get para Gyan, you get Atmagyan.atmagyan is realisation of true Self.The absolute Truth is the real and the worldly truth is the relative.In the relative world,we have action and reaction, karma, right wrong.etc.In the real, there is no judgement, just pure bliss.Patnayak is viewing our scriptures from an intellectual perspective, but they can only be truly explained by a self realised guru
Then what is paramount arma?
he said पर ( other) not परा।
If there was too many gods, human would have been in different shapes as per their personal choice, but we human is in shape, why? When we make something like house or vehicles all engineers make it differently rather than making one model, the same model, why? So I mean to say that if there were too many gods, they would have been made this world differently in different shapes, but not happened like that, because we all have one God like us in our shapes. Laxmi is having many hands, Kali is having many hands and heads. Shiva is having snakes on his neck, but we do not keep snakes in our home, why? Hanuman is a monkey shaped. Anyone today believe that he was able to speak with his god Ram? 10 Headed gods, Sun god, Moon god, snake god, Cow god, Animal gods, Calf god. All these are gods and goddess of human? Gods are not able to communicate with sounds like us, Can they hear our supplications? Are they really help us in all our matters? Please think.
Sir please get back to your old look
Good orator
Krishna saved draupdi from kauravs but the husbands were not punished
Did you read Mahabharata?? It is 10 volume of 300-700 pages each.... First read it in its entirety then talk about it... Idiot 2 minutes noodles generation or tiktok generation who don't have ability to read voluminous Mahabharata should not be talking about it based on their cursory or head ideas of Mahabharata. Idiots.
Fuck. Their should be situation to be I wife 5 husband. It still practice in Himalayas in India Nepal Pakistan. Not just happen. But now we can avoid such practice.
In other videos of devdutt , he elaborated that every yuga has different contums and beliefs. It should not be looked as right or wrong. Find the atmgyan so that u can be liberated though maya.
Mad man
Why Krishna was dead? Where he is now existed? Or Krishna permanently dead?
Which holy book of Hinduism authentic? Is the creation was explained in it? What about the first human? Of course population was gradually increased in the world, everyone knows. Then who were the first parent? How was the chronicle of generations explained in Hindu Holy Book? Is there any mention of the rain and rainbow? How it mentioned about the animals and vegetation?
Why Hinduism not spread in the world first before Christianity? Why all the inventions made by Jews and Christians and why not Hindus and Muslims? Every thing that we use today invented by Jews or Christians. Is it true? Then why so? Hindu gods are not knowledgeable?
Do you believe Shiva is the Pharaoh who loved snakes? His figure and photos are depicted as a snake, His headscarf depicts as the head of a snake, chin as the body of a snake. His hair on his head depicts a whole snake, Bunch of his head hair that pandits today keep on their head, what it means other than a snake? Pharaoh was a pandit as today’s Pandits who perform Pooja and rituals like Pharaoh did in Mishr (Egypt) in front of a statue god, Sun god and other creation of this world. Pharaoh fought war on chariots like Krishna and Pandavas that resembles in Mahabharata war. I have so many such questions.
long live the mongols and mughals. may we start another long lasting empire inshallah.
Jinka pita andha nai,lekin marr gaya ho wo kya duryodhan say battar hotha honga?
Everything has to be seen through Mughal and Buddhist perspective 😅😅
What is he saying first of all stop yourself from thinking that he is explaining some dharms etc it's completely distorted by himself
Sir, many times from childhood I had many questions like you, you studied and ellaborated but again I can say the depth of Hindu religion is not achieved even you will be wrong in further future
if u say it as a religion, still there is a problem.. Becoz religion is a middle-eastern and western phenomenon.
21:30
Where does Mughal e azam fit into Bhagavata Purana... hilarious 😂😂
Dev Dutt Patnaik is one of the biggest frauds.He has no clue of Bharath’s puranas, and no knowledge of Sanskrit. Pathetic he is treated as an ‘expert’.
I totally agree with you and the main problem with him is using word the mythology.
@@ashwinikumargiri9215 Best is to ignore him and his publications.
Jo atma gyan ka dandha chala rahay hai wo apna ahankaar ko suppress kiya huva hai.isliye ek false belief hai ki wo atma gyani hai. Ya soul realized hai.unkay paas kuch information hai.realized souls nahi hai. Atma ko bhagwan bhi bola jatha hai.aaj kal bhagwan sabsay tej biknay waala consumer item hai aur uskay ird gird kayi aur dandha fann fana raha hai.
Ye name Mughal tent kyu hai 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Atma gyan duniya may sahi mayno may kithnay logo ko praapt hai ? Who are so to say living atma gyanis? Atma ka intellectual understanding hi honga, bass aur kuch nahi.
why clapping? seriousness is missing here.
most of them are leftist wing
Male female ratio ka hisab say agar ek vyakti 5 ya jyada say shaadi kiya tho bohotho ko barbie doll hi naseeb honga. S#X dolls.
Joker
Romila dog is very sad