@@straightbusta2609I don't think its in same price range... but yea that race would be fair. but I feel like its going to take years when they actually release the cyber truck.
@@TheUltimate497 it wouldn't be. The Panda is a small city car with AWD for the narrow twisty mountain roads of Italy, it's not a pure off roader. It is an all rounder and it smashes the cybertruck in practicality and i'm pretty sure it would still beat the cybertruck in most realistic off road scenarios.
@@justsam100 the cyber truck is a "truck" which is meant for pulling load and and off-roading. the fiat panda is just a suv to drive around town, so I don't believe a suv to beat a truck in off-roading.
Fiat Panda Cross, one of my fav cars too. The italians built that for towns and cities with narrow streets. Rational. I like it. I would buy it. Just for inner city and town use.
@@KenanTurkiye european car design seems to be much more practical than US car design, especialy regarding cars like the Fiat Panda. I'm not a fan of Fiat, but that was genuinely impressive!
The REAL Fiat Panda 4x4 for all us Italians is the one from the 1986 to 2003. That was a REAL 4x4 (4WD, not an AWD), light, indestructible and a true jewel for snowed roads and muddy fields.
Knew the Panda would win before even watching the vid. A mate had one of the earlier models and it was a pocket monster. We'd take it through the horseshoe pass in North Wales during winter and drive on past stuck Land rovers! It's really an exceptional little motor.
Lack of weight is underrated. Remember some wicked offroad trails in Africa where we wizzed by expensive land/range rovers left and right in a little beaten up Pajero.
That panda was even better when they had the 1.3 litre diesel available. Any cheap 4x4 is a great 4x4 because you don't mind scratching/denting them. Who in their right mind spends £50k+ on a 4x4 and takes it off road?
The Sherp comes to mind. It costs about £50k-£120k, is amphibious and can handle virtually all kinds of off-roading, including boulders, fallen trees etc. I know it's a rare example, but my point is that the price tag isn't the primary reason. I think it just has to be that much better at off-roading to be worth it. The Model X is not even close to a proper off-road car, and this test also clearly demonstrates that, if anyone was ever in doubt. Cybertruck might be closer - especially with no paint to scratch - but we'll see when it gets here.
the Jimny has 2 live axles (better articulation), better angles, has low range, more power but less weight, bigger tyres, so... but yeah bring on the video please.
What we learned here: 1) 99% of SUV owners REALLY don't need them for their "off-roading ability" because they don't actually have any... 2) The Fiat Panda 4x4 is the best car ever. FACT.
@@OggyXXXL we call that the break over angle, but yes - shorter wheelbase with even similar or slightly less ground clearance will still clear obstacles better than a vehicle with a considerably longer wheelbase. Benefits of the latter are things like straight line stability in slippery terrain, but that becomes moot if you high center 🤷♂️
Every few years, a video crops up where the might Panda 4x4 (in its various forms over the past couple of decades) competes against a big luxury 4x4 - and the Panda always acquits itself very well.
If there's one thing I've learned in my many years of off-road driving on very slippery,narrow and difficult routes,it always helps to have multiple irritating beeps,bongs,flashing warnings and distractions when driving through challenging terrain or performing a manoeuvre.
I hate that cars are having more electronics than ever. 1st because it stops you to drive in full efficience 2nd because more electronics, more problems
3rd imagine travelling on highway and your Tesla runs out of charge no problem since there's gas right? Unfortunately doesn't work so you look for a charging station but there's none so you got to choices either wait for someone to get a full charged battery or gt your car impounded lol @@bananaempijama
Is it really a surprise? In the Alps region (in Italy) Panda cross is the most widespread car. I've talked to people that decided to buy one after having had different SUV. They say Panda performs in winter on the mountains much better than any other SUV. Of course the comfort in long journeys on the motorway is not good, but for the daily needs on the mountains it is simply unbeatable.
Hi Luigi....i have a 2015 Fiat Panda cross, 1.3mj engine, i have driven from Southern Calabria Italy to the UK twice now and found the car very comfortable.
@@saketnaik1 yea but he was right. It looks like a minivan as well. It‘s a great car but SUV are regularly not off road cars anymore, which is absolutely dumb.
my father used to have the oldschool Panda. That car was one of the best off roaders ive ever seen. One time a caravan was stuck in the sand. Then a Range Rover went to help and it stuck too. Then a jeep came to the rescue but guess what...yeap it stuck once again. At the end the tiny oldschool Panda saved the day by towing every single car that was stuck in the sand.
@@ramblingrob4693 lol you clearly have no clue about 4x4, probably never heard of the old mighty Panda. But i get it you like to flex a brand name and dont care about actual performance.
@@ramblingrob4693 as an italian who lives in the country side i've seen and heard a lot of similar story, the original panda 4x4 is a masterpiece for what it was supposed to be
i've seen 30 years old 4x4 pandas (all stock) going up and down icy, gravel mountain paths in ways i thought to be impossibile. That model probably weight 1000kg... (or less)
Panda are good cars in the sense they are more reliable than BMW, Merc or VAGs entire range including current porsche (porsche forgot how to make conrods and engine mounts recently) and I never thought I'd ever say that about a fiat. Would I buy a fiat?.. No, because the only one I'd trust was built correctly is the panda and even at that they have a habit of killing the occupants if they crash with even a dirt bike. If I lived out in France or Italy and ran vine yards I would have one as that's all they use out there, that or a scooby forester. Everything else including LRs don't seem to work right on wet grass. No joke that's all they own out there, two pandas or panda and forester and a road legal versions of some dirt bike. They spend their wonga on boats and have hobbies, unlike most of the UK where most spend their wages on an unreliable disposable financed car and latest moby handset. Who's the morons? Well you decide.
I’ve got a Fiat panda Cross, had it nearly 3 years. Absolutely brilliant on and off road. Get some better off road tyres and it’ll go just about anywhere. Bought it through Car Wow as well.
Matt, maybe do more panda vids. I used to have one, they’re great for their size, and they have a bit of character. The interior in mine was not well insulated so the noise from the engine was quite loud. Holding a conversation in it while driving was hilariously challenging. Still, I loved my panda. It was very practical for where I lived.
@@TheDude50447 the car will get the estimated fuel consumption set by the company,if driven at assessed speeds. However like with all other makes,excessive speeds will consume more fuel,especially after 130 klm.
@@quercus5398 In the city it works just fine but on the Autobahn I was surprised how the fuel consumption went up at speeds of around 130 kmh. Did some digging and found out that especially small turbocharged engines dont have sufficient cooling on the hot Turbo side and to a lesser degree the engine block. So what they do under sustained higher load scenarios is inject extra fuel (but no air) to just cool those parts down. Its part of the downsizing trend which isnt an issue when the fuel consumption is tested for. Also apparently another side effect is that due to higher pressures and more parts (especially the turbos) on the engine that in recent years engine repairs have become more expensive and more frequent.
@@TheDude50447 Basically like every other vehicle out there,one must inform themselves about the product then decide.....the two cylinder engine even though calls for sportiness,one has to baby the turbo, , Let it run a couple of minutes after arriving,and than there is lucky factor,once in a while out comes one vehicle that just wants to give you trouble.
@@quercus5398 You are correct that its an issue with every turbo charged engine but it gets worse the smaller the engine. Few months ago I watched a test here on youtube (cant remember where or I would send it) where they said that on the Motorway at around 130 kph a V8 Mustang has pretty much the same fuel economy as turbo charged 3 cylinders. Its a problem with how the fuel consumption figures are tested for. Long story short. The smaller your engine and the bigger the turbo on it the higher you will be above the claimed fuel consumption figures while its the opposite for bigger engines. In the light of that I opted to go for Mazdas 2 liter skyactiv x engine 2 months ago. After 4000 km now of autobahn and city driving my average fuel consumption is 5.5 litres.
2 года назад+16
In the 90’s I used to drive a Panda 4x4 a lot and it was a really wonderful off-roader. It was a bit low but I’ve always accompanied a few Nissan Patrol and Terrano II 😊
@@thebrowns5337 actually, software is largely responsible for the incredible acceleration performance of the Tesla. The extra control with electric motors allows the car to put as much energy into each wheel as possible without slipping. Digital technology is the future of cars
@@richardendresz161 you should! It makes a lot more sense than the imperial system. 261mm = 26.1cm = 2.61dm = 0.261m. Easy peasy! Makes a lot more sense than feet. My foot is larger than my wife’s. There is a reason science uses the metric system, it makes more sense!
2 car builders here. One thought about off-road use. The other one's Tesla. Side note. I'd actually love to have the Panda, not many new cars I can say that about!
I bet when Mat asked James to have his car he thought that Mat is gonna drag race it and embarrassing Ferraris, little did he know that Mat is destroying his car at a hard core off road track and had his car ass beaten by a Fiat panda !
There has been no Tesla Model X 100D that has beaten a Ferrari. You are referencing a Tesla Model X P100D and even that can not beat a brand new Ferrari. You got of thumbs up because people don’t know facts.
@@FightScienceAa82 well first of all it was a joke but if you really want to talk “facts” a Tesla Model X performance can do a quarter mile in 10.9 seconds the exact same as the Ferrari Portofino which is a brand new Ferrari. And that’s with the previous Model X stats the new plaid Model X will be able to do it in 9.9 which is closer to Ferrari SF90 numbers. So please do your research before you embarrass yourself and try to be a smartass a Model X can indeed beat a brand new Ferrari even the previous P100D
@@mrnoname7370 clearly you have a reading impairment and further can’t keep things in the context with exactly what I said. I said: “no Telsa Model X 100 D”. I also said the Tesla Model X P100D couldn’t beat a current Ferrari”. No one ever mentioned the Plaid Edition “Mr. Embarrassment”. This is the great thing about knowing your facts and being able to read before responding. That is why I specifically made reference to what, I specifically made reference to. Go puff your hollow chest with someone who doesn’t know about cars and their facts, son.
I think it would be interesting to see how off-road capability has changed through the generations of a car. For example something like BMW X5, over the 4 generations did it get better off-road or worse?
@@ihaveagooddayatworktodayan8682 the most impressive thing about Tesla is, their cars are getting more ugly with each model. When i thought the Model X and 3 were ugly as hell, they present the Model Y and the Cybertruck.
because the tesla "suv"(actually a minivan) has it s battery pack on the floor,and it s a structural element,so one flex to much and it's 16k or whatever it costs
i have a pana 4x4 wild 0.9l now in the monent 238tkm! i have also a volvo xc70 but with the panda i got at all never any problem,i absolutely love this car.also now we got a bunch of snow in iceland.he drive just where another suv get stuck.im always looking for a second panda but they very rare at us here.
Moreover, I would not do that with a Tesla. You risk deforming or puncturing the battery (which is just the bottom of the car) with the car catching fire as result, non-extinguishable fire...
@@mattbarnett6902 And why? This was not the purpose of this video. Shut up and stop making excuses. The tesla lost. The end. Probably if it wasn't the CEO's, it would have lost by a smaller margin, but who cares.
Fiat panda has always been good off road. They are known for it especially in France. See the French and italian vine yards all you see is pandas and foresters.
I remember going off road as a kid with a friend of my father on the Alps in Italy with an 1987 Panda Sisley 4x4 in military green. Such fun. Especially when it was rainy.
11:7 for the Panda? Oh come on Mat, I see what you did here!! Giving just a point for the winner of a contest and the cute Panda wins 5:1!! Forza Italia!! 😁
Not bothered about the result, just impressed by Fiat capabilities. Been dithering over buying one, mind now made up. Cheaper here in Spain than in UK 😎
don't base yourself just on this comparison, there very likely are much better options on the used market for offroad vehicles, it only looks good here because of the car it's going up against
@@ciao986 I live up a hill in a Spanish Pueblo. The entrance to my calle is 170cm wide which means if I fold my driver side mirror in I can get through without scratching it. That is why I am trading my Fiat 500S for a Panda Cross 4x4
@@TheJohnboyhunter wrong, companies buy new cars, so the ex-company cars feed the 2nd hand market mostly. Yes buying new is ridiculous, with loads of brands/models loosing 20-35% in value just driving off the property of the dealership. But still people do buy new, cars are about emotion to many.
sometimes buying a used car is a gamble, buy someone else's problems. New car less likely to have a hidden issues, so there is your peace-of-mind difference. the person that pays 100K for a new car will baby it. A Tesla is def a different story, a used one is still probably better than most new ICE cars XD
@@slingbart705 buying anything is a gamble. Moest people buy their used car from a dealership with warranty. Even calculating a slightly higher risk of breakdown when driving pre-owned, buying new is a ridiculous waste of money, certainly in NL. But you are right EV might change that status quo a bit...
@@ewoutbuhler5217 Here in the States, a used car from a dealer is an overpriced rip off, yes you'll get the rest of the 3 yr 36 mile warranty, but the financing rate will be terrible compared to new which you could get 0% ~ 1.9% financing for 60 months. Where you're at, used is much much cheaper and better regulated.
It's funny to see a Fiat Panda weighing almost 1,2 tonnes being light when my -87 Saab 90 weighs the same and I would never consider it a particularly light or small car, though it's not big by any means. Times have certainly changed.
@@pbr3d679 It's pretty amazing how much worse old Volvos perform in crash testing than just about any modern vehicle. Take a look at Fifth Gear's own testing for more clarification.
This confused me too. I tought they did it that way so they can assign 0 points if a car fails a trial outright, like the Tesla did on the uphill bit around 10:20 - but they still gave it one point. I don't understand the point of that point system.
It's because a car that completes the challenge being the second is not the same as a car that doesn't complete the challenge at all. You get 0 points if you don't complete the challenge, 1 point if you complete it, but your performance is lower than your competitor's. And 2 points if you're the winner of the challenge. Now, why did the Tesla got 1 point even if it failed the challenge I don't know (probably to close the gap between the 2), but the points system is alright I'd say.
Honestly the old small cars are the best, you can just thrash them and not only do they perform well, you have no issues about damage because you can very easily just repair them in your own garage and be back on the road for next to nothing.
The Panda did pretty impressive. That much HP and torque from such a small, two cilinder (!) engine! I love it when a smaller car is that capable! Now the Model X can take some hits at the bottom. But never do this with a Model 3: you risk breaking the unprotected plastic battery pack coolent intake at the bottom of the car which will set you back by $ 12,000...
@@Timochat_ they are TOTALLY brilliant. I met a guy on a caravan site a couple of years ago. He had a HUGE caravan, with an H reg jimminy by it. I asked where his tow car was, he replied”That’s it”.Wow. Knew they were tough, but that’s amazing, he said it towed with ease, it was a. Petrol 1.6!
@@wargames8503 Because somehow it is a stupid trend and people want it. Look at all the "SUVs" from other car companies. Mostly all of them are not really an offroader too.
@@CocaColaM14 Yeah I hate this trend too. They are just heavier and less efficient with no benefits to that. It really doesn't make sense in this world that's trying to be eco friendly.
I own a Panda 4x4 Cross (2016) and it doesn't surprise me how well it does in this test. It's pretty good in normal daily use as well. I'm sure if I had £68k to spent I'd buy three Panda's rather than the Tesla.
A good few years ago we visited a national park on a hilly area. I have seen the park service replaced their cars just recently, about half of them were Land Rover long trucks, the other half were Lada Nivas (both new). I was a bit baffled. I knew Niva was popular but I thought mostly because it was cheap. I approached a guy and asked them did they have to buy the Nivas instead of more LRs due to financial limits but he told me the larger cars like the Land Rover were nearly not as nimble and maneuverable, too big for a lot of forest roads, had too large a turning radius and were also too long. If they had to carry something up with a team of workers, tools etc then it was the Land Rover's job. But if you only needed one or two guys up the hillside with a few hand tools the Niva was much more capable, though it only had a petrol engine of 1.6L, about 70-75hps. Even today that Nivas are out of favour for some time it"s only the Suzuki Jimny/Samurai that is close to the same capability.
Model X height setting… after selecting preferred height hit the “KEEP” to hold that height until car exceeds 24km/h. Then it won’t return to std hgt until….
@@dragospahontu Because when a car is on two wheels the chassis bends slightly and once you open the door it is possible the door won't close back in its place since the chassis is slightly bending at that point.
Come on, lads! Panda is lighter, has a shorter wheelbase, a proper 4 by 4 trasmission and was made for it! Next time use an old Steyr Puch Panda and will be even more dramatic...
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Hi Mat here. Did you think the Tesla would perform as it did? Or were you surprised. Let me know below...and be honest 😆
How did the tesla lose .
Love you
No really surprised... It's a shopping car after all
I think that because is an expensive car you are afraid to go faster offroad because it costs too much to fix that if something goes wrong
Yes
Panda = rally king
Tesla = lifted sedan
tbh this isn't fair.
a fair race would be fiat panda vs cyber truck. you can't expect a car that drives around the city to be god at off-roading.
@@TheUltimate497 Yeah, because a Fiat Panda and a Cybertruck are in the same price range hmm
@@straightbusta2609I don't think its in same price range... but yea that race would be fair. but I feel like its going to take years when they actually release the cyber truck.
@@TheUltimate497 it wouldn't be.
The Panda is a small city car with AWD for the narrow twisty mountain roads of Italy, it's not a pure off roader.
It is an all rounder and it smashes the cybertruck in practicality and i'm pretty sure it would still beat the cybertruck in most realistic off road scenarios.
@@justsam100 the cyber truck is a "truck" which is meant for pulling load and and off-roading. the fiat panda is just a suv to drive around town, so I don't believe a suv to beat a truck in off-roading.
Suggest for Panda vs Jimny after this Matt
That would be a really interesting comparison.
Would love to see, although the results can be almost as predictable as this test. But show the panda the "goat" of small of roaders :D
Hell yes
Interesting
@carwow make it happen
“Ground clearance on this is better than the panda”
*text pops up*
Tesla: 211mm
Panda: 264mm
Your maths is broken.
Mafs*
@@straightbusta2609 Mat is stupid
Yeah, I was like tf dude
metric to imperial confusion!
At 4.45 they panda did the circuit quicker, but some how the Tesla bet the panda.
I was thinking of buying either a model X or a Panda. This video saved me thousands of euros and showed me who the real goat is.
The tesla is amazing for road. Better than the panda, but if u want to go offroading, the panda 100%
@@johnbenoy7532panda is best all round
Nevermind a tesla get a more affordable and better EV. Tesla is Apple of EVs, name only.
@@johnbenoy7532 if you want to drive on the road get the tesla, if you want to drive off road buy a Range Rover. You can keep your panda 😂
@@timhill5108 No dude No range rover
Fiat Panda exists.
James May: "I'll have one please"
Lol
Fiat Panda Cross, one of my fav cars too.
The italians built that for towns and cities with narrow streets.
Rational. I like it. I would buy it. Just for inner city and town use.
@@KenanTurkiye european car design seems to be much more practical than US car design, especialy regarding cars like the Fiat Panda.
I'm not a fan of Fiat, but that was genuinely impressive!
Actually he would like a Dacia Duster even better :P
i can hear him saying that 😂😂😂
The REAL Fiat Panda 4x4 for all us Italians is the one from the 1986 to 2003. That was a REAL 4x4 (4WD, not an AWD), light, indestructible and a true jewel for snowed roads and muddy fields.
Just bought a 1992. Best car I've ever owned!
Still used in some alpine refuges
ruclips.net/video/GXDOxidnlPY/видео.html this family in poland is traveling around the arctic circle in the old panda 4x4
Sì, ma che palle. Ora c'è questa panda, e va alla grande!
I loved that, I wanted it to be my first car very badly. Was too costly though, and ended up with a Panda Hobby instead. I loved that too anyway.
Fiat: 19 seconds
Mat: 50 seconds
Also mat: At least its less than a minute
Classic Mat...
Day made
@@carwow can u do a crazy minivan drag race like chrysler pacifica, toyata sienna ect? 😂
Lets say they had a model x they didn't care about....it would've easily won that race
@@uziwakeupp and broke it.
Knew the Panda would win before even watching the vid. A mate had one of the earlier models and it was a pocket monster. We'd take it through the horseshoe pass in North Wales during winter and drive on past stuck Land rovers! It's really an exceptional little motor.
Lack of weight is underrated. Remember some wicked offroad trails in Africa where we wizzed by expensive land/range rovers left and right in a little beaten up Pajero.
That panda was even better when they had the 1.3 litre diesel available. Any cheap 4x4 is a great 4x4 because you don't mind scratching/denting them. Who in their right mind spends £50k+ on a 4x4 and takes it off road?
You are agree, but look all those people who buy a 200k or more G-Wagen Brabus... for to drive fast on a perfect asphalt 🤦🏻♂️
The tesla isn't supposed to be taken off road. To answer your second question, rich people do.
The Sherp comes to mind. It costs about £50k-£120k, is amphibious and can handle virtually all kinds of off-roading, including boulders, fallen trees etc. I know it's a rare example, but my point is that the price tag isn't the primary reason. I think it just has to be that much better at off-roading to be worth it. The Model X is not even close to a proper off-road car, and this test also clearly demonstrates that, if anyone was ever in doubt. Cybertruck might be closer - especially with no paint to scratch - but we'll see when it gets here.
200 series Landcruiser Sahara??
@@lukaposeidon8490 big lol, its a torque monster awd car with air Suspensions, the audi etron does very well offroad.
I’d like to see that little Fiat and the Jimny in an off road test
the Jimny has 2 live axles (better articulation), better angles, has low range, more power but less weight, bigger tyres, so... but yeah bring on the video please.
Yes please!
Yes I want too see that as well
Better a Panda Cross vs Ignis 4x4...
@@josepaixao6519 of course! The panda and the ignis are very rivals
What we learned here:
1) 99% of SUV owners REALLY don't need them for their "off-roading ability" because they don't actually have any...
2) The Fiat Panda 4x4 is the best car ever. FACT.
Actually IMO the Suzuki Jimny is better than the Fiat Panda 4x4
Completely agree! Fiat Panda 4x4 best fun car by far. 😎👍😁
Miller corner SUV owners need to go through puddles when taking their lazy kids to school 🤣
99% Of facts in the comments are false.
@@PushyPawn Says a tesla owner/fan when his car is clearly out performed by an 'inferior' cheaper and far more practical city car. ⚠️😁😯
So, the Panda definitely has better clearance. If my math serves me right, 261 is higher than 211, but I'm no expert.
And short base = bigger ramp angle
@@OggyXXXL spot on mate,
Probably a Typo. As far as I know, it has 161 MM if ground clearance.
@@OggyXXXL we call that the break over angle, but yes - shorter wheelbase with even similar or slightly less ground clearance will still clear obstacles better than a vehicle with a considerably longer wheelbase.
Benefits of the latter are things like straight line stability in slippery terrain, but that becomes moot if you high center 🤷♂️
As an Italian, I enjoyed watching this.
As a Panda living in the London Zoo, me too!
hahah pure io
Same
@@Kelveron but can you do kung fu as well?
As a Brazilian, I also enjoyed watching it. I was seriously hoping the Panda would win
Every few years, a video crops up where the might Panda 4x4 (in its various forms over the past couple of decades) competes against a big luxury 4x4 - and the Panda always acquits itself very well.
That is so true :D
The problem is they are SOOOO00000ooooooo ugly
@@joshw9277 Or your ego is too big.
@@joshw9277 bro they are literally so cute
@Akhenaton Lada Niva the first suv ever
If there's one thing I've learned in my many years of off-road driving on very slippery,narrow and difficult routes,it always helps to have multiple irritating beeps,bongs,flashing warnings and distractions when driving through challenging terrain or performing a manoeuvre.
The future of motoring, a computer nanny overseeing and stopping you from making your own decisions
I hate that cars are having more electronics than ever.
1st because it stops you to drive in full efficience
2nd because more electronics, more problems
I hate my parking beeps, at each and every damned manouvre
@@bananaempijama yeah and they're costly problems
3rd imagine travelling on highway and your Tesla runs out of charge no problem since there's gas right? Unfortunately doesn't work so you look for a charging station but there's none so you got to choices either wait for someone to get a full charged battery or gt your car impounded lol @@bananaempijama
Is it really a surprise? In the Alps region (in Italy) Panda cross is the most widespread car. I've talked to people that decided to buy one after having had different SUV. They say Panda performs in winter on the mountains much better than any other SUV. Of course the comfort in long journeys on the motorway is not good, but for the daily needs on the mountains it is simply unbeatable.
Hi Luigi....i have a 2015 Fiat Panda cross, 1.3mj engine, i have driven from Southern Calabria Italy to the UK twice now and found the car very comfortable.
Panda 4x4 is also a great city car. Compact, great visibility and fantastically easy to park.
Tesla: "The Model X is a Sport Utility Vehicle with Falcon Wing doors"
Doug DeMuro: "Its a minivan with pigeon wing doors"
ruclips.net/video/RbvurjE3kTE/видео.html
I agree
Well in all honesty... He was joking too 😂
how does dougs joke video have anything to do with this
@@saketnaik1 yea but he was right. It looks like a minivan as well. It‘s a great car but SUV are regularly not off road cars anymore, which is absolutely dumb.
my father used to have the oldschool Panda. That car was one of the best off roaders ive ever seen. One time a caravan was stuck in the sand. Then a Range Rover went to help and it stuck too. Then a jeep came to the rescue but guess what...yeap it stuck once again. At the end the tiny oldschool Panda saved the day by towing every single car that was stuck in the sand.
@EusoikYT two words never said in the same sentence
BS
@@ramblingrob4693 lol you clearly have no clue about 4x4, probably never heard of the old mighty Panda. But i get it you like to flex a brand name and dont care about actual performance.
@@ramblingrob4693 as an italian who lives in the country side i've seen and heard a lot of similar story, the original panda 4x4 is a masterpiece for what it was supposed to be
@@ArisHDi its hard to believe how good it was for the price
It's epic, when this guy starts the race with the female voice.😆 3... 2... 1... GO!
Didn’t even notice that!🤭
zawsze tak robią ;)
it's always the female voice regardless of who's counting down, but in this particular video it is funny because we can see the guy closer
They have done it for ages :)
Ale że naszego ulubionego Petrolheada tutaj spotkamy to się nie spodziewałem zupełnie. Pozdrówki))
i've seen 30 years old 4x4 pandas (all stock) going up and down icy, gravel mountain paths in ways i thought to be impossibile. That model probably weight 1000kg... (or less)
Depending on the options and the age, they can be as light as 740kg, and never over 850kg empty.
yes of the best cars for slight offroad/snowy roads no traction issues ever
For anyone that does not like participation awards that is 5-1 for the panda.
And grouping 3 challenges into 1 "final" challenge. Should have been 7-2 otherwise.
Yeah I think they used the 2 points 1 point system just to not make the tesla look bad LOL
I would have thought 1 point for finishing and 0 points for failing the test but no, he really did hand out points for participation haha.
Even counting participation for aborted attempts...oh well, it's easy being in 2nd place if there are only two cars.
@@dodgywheelsandropeywiring5697 Yeah man, i thought the same at first. 2 points = winner 1 point = finishing 0 points = not finishing.
All fiat pandas are legends, FIAT really knows what they are talking about
2018 fiat panda got zero stars in euroncap, it still has zero stars for the current year.
@@reenachauriya4931 If you buy a panda you're here for a good time not a long time😂
@@pramay5116 doubt you'd even be having a good time with that 95 or was it 85 hp
@@ridgefrost 100hp, 1100kg, AWD and a manual gearbox is just about as much fun as you can have
Panda are good cars in the sense they are more reliable than BMW, Merc or VAGs entire range including current porsche (porsche forgot how to make conrods and engine mounts recently) and I never thought I'd ever say that about a fiat. Would I buy a fiat?.. No, because the only one I'd trust was built correctly is the panda and even at that they have a habit of killing the occupants if they crash with even a dirt bike. If I lived out in France or Italy and ran vine yards I would have one as that's all they use out there, that or a scooby forester. Everything else including LRs don't seem to work right on wet grass. No joke that's all they own out there, two pandas or panda and forester and a road legal versions of some dirt bike. They spend their wonga on boats and have hobbies, unlike most of the UK where most spend their wages on an unreliable disposable financed car and latest moby handset. Who's the morons? Well you decide.
I’ve got a Fiat panda Cross, had it nearly 3 years. Absolutely brilliant on and off road. Get some better off road tyres and it’ll go just about anywhere.
Bought it through Car Wow as well.
This was very entertaining. However, I think a better comparison would be the Panda vs Jimny 😂
I love the Fiat but it doesn't stand a chance against the Jimny ,maybe the old Panda but not this one
Yes, the Jimny would be a much better comparison.
And to add insult to injury, let's put the Tesla up against the Range Rover 🤣
@@Perry_dAccard it might be closer than you think.... oh who am i kidding the tesla will get it's ass handed to it on a silver platter
As we say here in Italy "Il Pandino ti porta ovunque" (lil Panda is gonna bring you everywhere)
Il pandarmato
Carmagheddon
Panda orgoglio d'Italia 💙🇮🇹
IL PANDINO
Now I understand why you people love the Panda so much
Conclusion: If you want a brand new Cheap SUV, buy a Fiat Panda...
Or a Dacia Duster!
The panda looks like such a fun car to drive
@@bogdanpoienaru8660 It would be James May's choice
@@exoticdriver84 yes sir!!! 😂😂😂
Or Lada Niva
Matt, maybe do more panda vids. I used to have one, they’re great for their size, and they have a bit of character. The interior in mine was not well insulated so the noise from the engine was quite loud. Holding a conversation in it while driving was hilariously challenging.
Still, I loved my panda. It was very practical for where I lived.
Like how the CEO didn’t even use car wow to find his car purchase 😂😂😂
😵😂😂
Burn !!
yeah that's not very good publicity...
That's the thing with it. Just making money
How do you know that?
"light" and "cheap" two words that have lost all sense of meaning where cars are concerned.
My old 106 weighed about 800kg and cost me £300, in my mind that's what a call cheap and light. Not a 1200kg £18000 panda.
Anything under 3500 lbs is considered light now.
@@The1977andi ah yes a used, beat to death, worthless 30 year old shitbox is cheaper than a brand new very decent 4x4. Go figure.
@@jonytube Did you just call a Fiat Panda a 'very decent 4x4'? A FIAT PANDA???
@@jonytube no my point was 1200kg isn't light and£18000 isn't cheap.
The two cylinder engine is quick,and was engine of the year,fun and cheap to drive, very reliable....kudos to Fiat.
Eats fuel like nobodys business though on the Autobahn.
@@TheDude50447 the car will get the estimated fuel consumption set by the company,if driven at assessed speeds.
However like with all other makes,excessive speeds will consume more fuel,especially after 130 klm.
@@quercus5398 In the city it works just fine but on the Autobahn I was surprised how the fuel consumption went up at speeds of around 130 kmh. Did some digging and found out that especially small turbocharged engines dont have sufficient cooling on the hot Turbo side and to a lesser degree the engine block. So what they do under sustained higher load scenarios is inject extra fuel (but no air) to just cool those parts down. Its part of the downsizing trend which isnt an issue when the fuel consumption is tested for. Also apparently another side effect is that due to higher pressures and more parts (especially the turbos) on the engine that in recent years engine repairs have become more expensive and more frequent.
@@TheDude50447 Basically like every other vehicle out there,one must inform themselves about the product
then decide.....the two cylinder engine even though calls for sportiness,one has to baby the turbo,
,
Let it run a couple of minutes after arriving,and than there is lucky factor,once in a while out comes
one vehicle that just wants to give you trouble.
@@quercus5398 You are correct that its an issue with every turbo charged engine but it gets worse the smaller the engine. Few months ago I watched a test here on youtube (cant remember where or I would send it) where they said that on the Motorway at around 130 kph a V8 Mustang has pretty much the same fuel economy as turbo charged 3 cylinders. Its a problem with how the fuel consumption figures are tested for. Long story short. The smaller your engine and the bigger the turbo on it the higher you will be above the claimed fuel consumption figures while its the opposite for bigger engines. In the light of that I opted to go for Mazdas 2 liter skyactiv x engine 2 months ago. After 4000 km now of autobahn and city driving my average fuel consumption is 5.5 litres.
In the 90’s I used to drive a Panda 4x4 a lot and it was a really wonderful off-roader. It was a bit low but I’ve always accompanied a few Nissan Patrol and Terrano II 😊
What other crazy off-road comparisons do you want to see in the future? Let us know below!
Consider the Ford Ranger Raptor, Nissan Navara and Toyota Hilux
@carwow Maybe an electric off-road comparison?
Tiguan vs Peugeot 3008 vs RAV4 vs Nissan Qashqai
Toyota vanguard
You just compared vodka with wine
Fiat: goes flawless over the path and finishes it in style.
Tesla: *cries in digital stroke*
Digital sucks in cars
@@thebrowns5337 jepp, only gives you stupid problems you need to pay for.
@@thebrowns5337 actually, software is largely responsible for the incredible acceleration performance of the Tesla. The extra control with electric motors allows the car to put as much energy into each wheel as possible without slipping. Digital technology is the future of cars
@@jacobdaniels3246 You can do that with a normal engine too
"AcKcHyUaLlY," @@jacobdaniels3246?
When the term 'crossover' is more capable of being an off-roader than a suv...
Maybe because a SUV is not an offroader?
@@n3ssaya972 nor is the crossover an off reader
@@Ilovetoes6996 it clearly is meant to be since it has drive on all wheels and is lifted and performs superbly at it.
Model X isn't an SUV. It's an MPV which looks a bit like SUV
@@maxpoweroverdrive Agree, but the Tesla website literally call the model X as a SUV.
Whatever divisive arguments will be made for and against the Tesla, I’m sure we can all agree the Panda is frigging awesome.
🥂
This proves that getting a vehicle for your actual driving needs and conditions is better than just buying for speed, power or comfort.
Correct, this perfectly shows the concept of the "Job to be Done". For this type of driving conditions the Model X is not the right choice
Also summer tires are pointless on mud lol
8:22 says ground clearance is better than panda: shows Tesla with 211mm clearance and Panda with 261mm clearance lol
They gotta get used to this whole “metric system” thing
@@richardendresz161 stop giving the peasant the benefit of the doubt
@@richardendresz161 you should! It makes a lot more sense than the imperial system. 261mm = 26.1cm = 2.61dm = 0.261m.
Easy peasy!
Makes a lot more sense than feet. My foot is larger than my wife’s.
There is a reason science uses the metric system, it makes more sense!
panda actually got 161mm, not 261, it's a typo
The 4x4 pandas are notoriously popular in the French Alps due too their light weight, efficiency and price.
Fiat may have reliability issues but they are fun cars, the thing I am sad about is that they are pretty much dead in all their lineup
@@TopG800 To be fair, their new models are so old that they all have good reliability now
@@saraleon97 that is relativilly true
@@TopG800 My fiat punto 1900 JTDm diesel 650000 Km and then i selt it.......are you shure, fiat is unreliability?
2 car builders here. One thought about off-road use. The other one's Tesla.
Side note. I'd actually love to have the Panda, not many new cars I can say that about!
2:43
Voice: Women
Appearance: Bald man
Maybe he is LPGHDTV+, don't hate on him.
Did you assume his gender?
Respect BLT+ persons plzzz
They put the same voice in every video. It doesn't depend on the guy who is starting the race e. g.
I bet when Mat asked James to have his car he thought that Mat is gonna drag race it and embarrassing Ferraris, little did he know that Mat is destroying his car at a hard core off road track and had his car ass beaten by a Fiat panda !
Well technically Fiat owns Ferrari, so he did race against Ferrari's Big Daddy(or small Daddy in this particular case)
There has been no Tesla Model X 100D that has beaten a Ferrari. You are referencing a Tesla Model X P100D and even that can not beat a brand new Ferrari. You got of thumbs up because people don’t know facts.
@@FightScienceAa82 well first of all it was a joke but if you really want to talk “facts” a Tesla Model X performance can do a quarter mile in 10.9 seconds the exact same as the Ferrari Portofino which is a brand new Ferrari. And that’s with the previous Model X stats the new plaid Model X will be able to do it in 9.9 which is closer to Ferrari SF90 numbers. So please do your research before you embarrass yourself and try to be a smartass a Model X can indeed beat a brand new Ferrari even the previous P100D
@@mrnoname7370 clearly you have a reading impairment and further can’t keep things in the context with exactly what I said. I said: “no Telsa Model X 100 D”. I also said the Tesla Model X P100D couldn’t beat a current Ferrari”. No one ever mentioned the Plaid Edition “Mr. Embarrassment”. This is the great thing about knowing your facts and being able to read before responding. That is why I specifically made reference to what, I specifically made reference to. Go puff your hollow chest with someone who doesn’t know about cars and their facts, son.
@@mrnoname7370 don’t make me pull 1/4 mile times on a Tesla Model X P100 or P100D and a Ferrari F8.
That Tesla is gonna have even more panel gaps now, that mat could drive the panda through.
Makes perfect sense bro
@@abhadwivedi6381 Panda > Tesla
NOPE, Check out the Reviews of the 2021 Model X and Model S PLAID.
Build Quality is Fantastic, better than MOST Luxury EUROPEAN OEM's.
@@markplott4820 Nice joke. The Plaid is as bad as before. Terrible cars.
@@markplott4820 lmfao stop lying. There is no american car with fantastic build quality, let alone a Tesla. Even the Plaid is terrible for the price.
Useless, but sooo fun to watch, thanks :) Had the panda year ago and was awesome fun car.
I think it would be interesting to see how off-road capability has changed through the generations of a car. For example something like BMW X5, over the 4 generations did it get better off-road or worse?
I would love to see what a modern x5 can do offroad
Probably slightly better due to a better AWD system and a now optional rear locker. The Porsche Cayenne got worse though cause it lost its low range.
Good idea but to be fair the X5 was always rubbish off road.
Would be better to compare the various generations of either Rangerover of Landcruiser.
I would love to see a off road drag race: Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan Qashqai vs Peugeot 3008 vs VW Tiguan
Only rav4 is upper segment the others are the same class
Where is MB GLB?
@@ezel6043 no it isn't, it's absolutely the same class with Qashqai and 3008. It's actually a little bit bigger
Hmm interesting
@@ezel6043 Tiguan and RAV4 are definitely more upper class than the Qasqai and 3008 which are in no way designed to be used off-road.
Aw. The panda has so many essential features. It's adorable and functional.
It also has more consistent panel gaps than the Tesla lol
tesla:"we are going to make a futuristic car that everyone will be able to enjoy!"
fiat:"i just put some weels on a baloons and it goes really well!"
Unbelievable, but the Fiat is the better looking car here.
both are beautiful cars, but the panda is just too legendary.
The Model X is ugly as. All Tesla’s are honestly.
@@kelvin7019 i almost thought you were serious.
@@ihaveagooddayatworktodayan8682 the most impressive thing about Tesla is, their cars are getting more ugly with each model. When i thought the Model X and 3 were ugly as hell, they present the Model Y and the Cybertruck.
@@origaminefretami3480 the Cybertruck is atleast different and i can see people liking it. the other Teslas are just BORING in a bad way-
I love the fact that matt is scared of damaging the tesla but doesn't give a f about the fiat😂
This is literally what the panda 4x4 was made for if it gets damaged its good to know how it takes it.
@@chrishart8548 yeah😂
because the tesla "suv"(actually a minivan) has it s battery pack on the floor,and it s a structural element,so one flex to much and it's 16k or whatever it costs
@@fabreezethefaintinggoat5484 70k
@@fabreezethefaintinggoat5484 but I drag race that thing smashes lambos
I love watching these offroad challenges on a lazy weekend morning.
i have a pana 4x4 wild 0.9l now in the monent 238tkm! i have also a volvo xc70 but with the panda i got at all never any problem,i absolutely love this car.also now we got a bunch of snow in iceland.he drive just where another suv get stuck.im always looking for a second panda but they very rare at us here.
The incessant beeping and bonging from the Tesla is absolutely infuriating
Moreover, I would not do that with a Tesla. You risk deforming or puncturing the battery (which is just the bottom of the car) with the car catching fire as result, non-extinguishable fire...
@@Crosley-1520 Tesla are stooopid
@@mamattosei yep
Take them on the street and test them. Then let's see which one walks away with the win.
@@mattbarnett6902 And why? This was not the purpose of this video. Shut up and stop making excuses. The tesla lost. The end. Probably if it wasn't the CEO's, it would have lost by a smaller margin, but who cares.
Never thought of this race
Sure that's really fun
The Model X's utility is akin to a brick being a good scissors.
Not the Model X, SUVs in general
So does either gonna land in your collection?
@@zoltanmeszaros4684 No, but i might switch a baneblade with a Panda. That is bound to create a funny scene to be... seen....
LOL, the funniest comment here. But still truthful.
That Panda 4x4 is a little beast!! I need one of them
Doug: This drag race is quirky
Mat: Let's collaborate then
The panda is actually quite good at off roading, never thought I would say that
Ιmagine putting off road tires
Fiat panda has always been good off road. They are known for it especially in France. See the French and italian vine yards all you see is pandas and foresters.
Fiat's little Panda 4x4 is absolutely brilliant - love it!
11:30 From rain to sunshine in one second:)
This does put a smile on my face! Go Italy! Avanti!!!
Just goes to show how these modern "SUVs" are just minivans with another name.
That said, that Panda is very cool, I want one
That tesla weights as much as a v8 pickup truck and isn't rated for off-roading. This proves nothing against SUVs.
This is what I keep saying, these things are just MPV People carriers, if the old Renault Scenic and Espace came out now they would be called SUVs
@Dabody Plays this comment has special needs vibes
@Dabody Plays that still doesn't have to do with anything. What are you gonna do? Leave them open for more aero?
this is the second time i rooted for the Italians to win something
As an Englishman I think I know what the first one was…….
@@Ro99 🤣
Surely you’re talking about last week then?
@@Ro99 😂😂😂
@@Ro99 😂😂😂
I remember going off road as a kid with a friend of my father on the Alps in Italy with an 1987 Panda Sisley 4x4 in military green. Such fun. Especially when it was rainy.
11:7 for the Panda? Oh come on Mat, I see what you did here!! Giving just a point for the winner of a contest and the cute Panda wins 5:1!! Forza Italia!! 😁
My suggestion:
3 points for winning.
0 points for passing the test 2nd.
-1 points for failing to complete the test.
'cute'??? That thing is hideous.
@@joshw9277 bro that's the mirror, the car is over there!
I love how the Panda designed, i think i should buy one
Fiat Panda to Tesla Model X: I'm 4 parallel universes ahead of you, lol.
‘Riding in my fiat, u rlly have to see it” 😂
saving money so it can fold, yo
Not bothered about the result, just impressed by Fiat capabilities. Been dithering over buying one, mind now made up. Cheaper here in Spain than in UK 😎
don't base yourself just on this comparison, there very likely are much better options on the used market for offroad vehicles, it only looks good here because of the car it's going up against
did pretty well against a land rover defender. Dont let your prejudices get in the way of being fair to the 4x4 cross.
@@ciao986 I live up a hill in a Spanish Pueblo. The entrance to my calle is 170cm wide which means if I fold my driver side mirror in I can get through without scratching it. That is why I am trading my Fiat 500S for a Panda Cross 4x4
You know that buying a new car is a waste of money when even the CEO of a car buying comparison site buys a used one
If no-one bought new cars, there would be no used cars to buy.
@@TheJohnboyhunter wrong, companies buy new cars, so the ex-company cars feed the 2nd hand market mostly. Yes buying new is ridiculous, with loads of brands/models loosing 20-35% in value just driving off the property of the dealership. But still people do buy new, cars are about emotion to many.
sometimes buying a used car is a gamble, buy someone else's problems. New car less likely to have a hidden issues, so there is your peace-of-mind difference.
the person that pays 100K for a new car will baby it. A Tesla is def a different story, a used one is still probably better than most new ICE cars XD
@@slingbart705 buying anything is a gamble. Moest people buy their used car from a dealership with warranty. Even calculating a slightly higher risk of breakdown when driving pre-owned, buying new is a ridiculous waste of money, certainly in NL. But you are right EV might change that status quo a bit...
@@ewoutbuhler5217 Here in the States, a used car from a dealer is an overpriced rip off, yes you'll get the rest of the 3 yr 36 mile warranty, but the financing rate will be terrible compared to new which you could get 0% ~ 1.9% financing for 60 months. Where you're at, used is much much cheaper and better regulated.
Congrats to the brave soul who lent their Model X on an off-roading challenge lol
It was probably already broken somewhere on it.
Dam the Fiat did the job I don't think think the tesla do as much as the Fiat because it's not the p100d
that brave soul is making money out of it.
@@nicksokolis6343 Lol😂😂
They will repair any damage they do.
It's funny to see a Fiat Panda weighing almost 1,2 tonnes being light when my -87 Saab 90 weighs the same and I would never consider it a particularly light or small car, though it's not big by any means. Times have certainly changed.
That's modern safety reg for you.
I know exactly what you mean, it's only 100kg less than my Volvo V50, and the Volvo has more crash protection than a destruction derby car.
Consider that a 1987 panda weighs probably 700 kgs, so yes cars changed more in the last 20 years than in all the XX century i guess
And still it performs better or comparable to a Saab90 with only a 900cc engine!!! Amazing!!!
@@pbr3d679 It's pretty amazing how much worse old Volvos perform in crash testing than just about any modern vehicle. Take a look at Fifth Gear's own testing for more clarification.
I legit winced at the end when they were testing the break-over angles...that Tesla ain't it, chief.
Just keep it simple and assign 1 point to the winner of each challenge.
Panda wins easy 5:1.
This confused me too. I tought they did it that way so they can assign 0 points if a car fails a trial outright, like the Tesla did on the uphill bit around 10:20 - but they still gave it one point. I don't understand the point of that point system.
Guess they secretly kept track of how many challenges they made by that or something.
no, we all get participation points...
It's because a car that completes the challenge being the second is not the same as a car that doesn't complete the challenge at all.
You get 0 points if you don't complete the challenge, 1 point if you complete it, but your performance is lower than your competitor's. And 2 points if you're the winner of the challenge.
Now, why did the Tesla got 1 point even if it failed the challenge I don't know (probably to close the gap between the 2), but the points system is alright I'd say.
he just didnt want to break the tesla...panda is a cheap car tbh so he was careful with the tesla wich cots about x6 times more than the panda
Honestly the old small cars are the best, you can just thrash them and not only do they perform well, you have no issues about damage because you can very easily just repair them in your own garage and be back on the road for next to nothing.
The Panda did pretty impressive. That much HP and torque from such a small, two cilinder (!) engine! I love it when a smaller car is that capable! Now the Model X can take some hits at the bottom. But never do this with a Model 3: you risk breaking the unprotected plastic battery pack coolent intake at the bottom of the car which will set you back by $ 12,000...
Hey, I could get a really good 2nd hand Panda for that!
@@davidaustin2172 or maybe even a 2nd hand Suzuki jimny !
@@Timochat_ they are TOTALLY brilliant. I met a guy on a caravan site a couple of years ago. He had a HUGE caravan, with an H reg jimminy by it. I asked where his tow car was, he replied”That’s it”.Wow. Knew they were tough, but that’s amazing, he said it towed with ease, it was a. Petrol 1.6!
Engine breaking up after 200 000km😂💀 thanks to 2cylinder
why would you do that with a model 3 lmao
Panda 4x4 is unbeatable.... and the old 1.3 turbo diesel with more torque was even better!
Normal score was 5 to 1 for Panda. Tesla didn't score anything but once
Did you consider setting the tesla to it's optima off road settings before you gave panda points?
As a Panda owner (albeit, an older one) I can confirm, Pandas are nimble little cars.
Fiat makes solid cars
The Tesla has literally zero offroad capabilities and features. Just because It's AWD and somwhat SUVish looking really doesn't qualify for it.
True
Of course it doesn’t. It wasn’t designed to be an offroader after all.
What's the point of such an SUV then? Why not just go for a sedan at this point?
@@wargames8503 Because somehow it is a stupid trend and people want it. Look at all the "SUVs" from other car companies. Mostly all of them are not really an offroader too.
@@CocaColaM14 Yeah I hate this trend too. They are just heavier and less efficient with no benefits to that. It really doesn't make sense in this world that's trying to be eco friendly.
I really love tesla,but secretly i wanted Panda to win 🤫 lol
No car can beat a Panda in an off-road competition, and in Italy we still complaint that the new Panda is not as good as the old one 😂
Man, I wish the Panda Cross was available in Canada. Would be perfect to hoon around in the snow with.
Canada sounds like its natural habitat
haha yes!
Will be hard to drive on highways as everyone accelerates and speed quicker. Makes lot of sense if you drive inside a city
@@nagitoyup6929 not really they have pretty low speed limits, panda keep up easy just use correct gear
downhill part is the best, 7:01 Tesla "YEEEET" 😂😂
tesla always want to be fast regardless of what competition it's in 🤣
Difference is the panda cross was made for going offroad whereas the Tesla was made for the road
Yee and thats why i think tesla made cybertruck.... Maybe
@@war4race622 most likely
Yea, it's more like an American suv for curbing and picking up groceries.
@@S41N7 and maybe this is why tesla didnt sell it to a country with bad road such as india, etc
Trust Tesla to make an SUV that can't go off-road.
I own a Panda 4x4 Cross (2016) and it doesn't surprise me how well it does in this test. It's pretty good in normal daily use as well. I'm sure if I had £68k to spent I'd buy three Panda's rather than the Tesla.
Carwow, never in excess. We love you
❤️
@@carwow can you please do a drag race of Tesla plaid 🥺
How would they do the roll race on foot?
Realistically would've made more sense for a Panda versus Mat's Jimny
"Matt, its James"
Wait I have heard something like this before.
Valtteri, it's James!
Valterri.... its james please hold position
Edit : Daren is there aswell
Yup, it's in Throttle House I think!
@@kunjupulla in Formula 1 aswell but it's a meme lol
Oh boy anyone waiting for the Dutch grand prix and the welcome that Hamilton is gonna get.
A good few years ago we visited a national park on a hilly area. I have seen the park service replaced their cars just recently, about half of them were Land Rover long trucks, the other half were Lada Nivas (both new). I was a bit baffled. I knew Niva was popular but I thought mostly because it was cheap. I approached a guy and asked them did they have to buy the Nivas instead of more LRs due to financial limits but he told me the larger cars like the Land Rover were nearly not as nimble and maneuverable, too big for a lot of forest roads, had too large a turning radius and were also too long. If they had to carry something up with a team of workers, tools etc then it was the Land Rover's job. But if you only needed one or two guys up the hillside with a few hand tools the Niva was much more capable, though it only had a petrol engine of 1.6L, about 70-75hps. Even today that Nivas are out of favour for some time it"s only the Suzuki Jimny/Samurai that is close to the same capability.
Jimmny, Duster and Panda next time? :D
Add the Lada Niva then that would be amazing
@@jamess2928 the niva is a TANK, put some proper offroad tyres on it and it will take you anywhere
@@Fred_the_1996 Yeah, definitely. One of the best "modern" offroaders in my opinion.
A drag race we never expected but we still love
Model X height setting… after selecting preferred height hit the “KEEP” to hold that height until car exceeds 24km/h. Then it won’t return to std hgt until….
Lc300 vs g63
Why was mad scared of testing out the falcon doors?
@@dragospahontu dirt on the sensors?
@@dragospahontu Because when a car is on two wheels the chassis bends slightly and once you open the door it is possible the door won't close back in its place since the chassis is slightly bending at that point.
@@SDav21 the door will open and close with no damage.... just trust me lol
We need Panda v Jimny!
Love the girls voice when she ain’t there
And i think they should cut it, looks and sounds weird.
Are you sure though?!
@@carwow yeah i am sure, i think it would be much much better to add male voice for males countdown instead of female voice on everything.
@@lukaesitashvili9131 but its iconic
@@carwowyeah me too but the thing is, sometimes i feel like it scared me a bit😂😂am i high or something lol
Seeing the Tesla Model X struggle so much at basic SUV performance gives me great joy
It is not SUV performance. SUVs are not offroaders. They are dragging machines.
Can we please see the AMG GT Black Series and Porsche GT2 RS drag race
before they become electric cars🤦♂️
Great shout!
Offroad battle between those two
Come on, lads! Panda is lighter, has a shorter wheelbase, a proper 4 by 4 trasmission and was made for it! Next time use an old Steyr Puch Panda and will be even more dramatic...
I have a Panda Cross and yes it's a brilliant little car 🙂 A cheap to buy and run little 4x4 👍
Fiero di essere italiano🇮🇹❤🚘