Full Review! Seiko Presage Style ‘60s GMT SSK009

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 окт 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @riflemusket
    @riflemusket 4 месяца назад +2

    Props for mentioning the ‘Dauphine’ style hands! My 1982 Seiko 5 has the same hands and similar applied indices. A classic look. I saw this in a watch shop yesterday and I’m very tempted to pull the trigger. The caseback says ‘5 Bar’, so it’s 50m water resistance.

  • @djomanchester
    @djomanchester Год назад

    FYI.. The Seiko SSK015 white dial anniversary edition limited for the same price does sapphire crystal! Nice steel surround 👍

  • @UltraDoug
    @UltraDoug Год назад +3

    Gah!!!! I was TOTALLY down with this until you said Hardlex. Dang it. That’s a deal breaker for me. Man that’s a great lookin watch.

    • @anonymouswatchguy4223
      @anonymouswatchguy4223  Год назад +2

      Yea Seiko just can’t give us what we want.. should be sapphire at this price point

    • @SampleTracks2224
      @SampleTracks2224 Год назад

      Why did you think this had sapphire? No other entry level Presage has sapphire. None of them

    • @UltraDoug
      @UltraDoug Год назад +1

      @@SampleTracks2224 I dunno…..hope? Lol

    • @sebastiannowakowski5084
      @sebastiannowakowski5084 9 месяцев назад

      Main reason I don’t own any Seiko… they only out sapphire on ‘more expensive’ models and then put in a cheap caliber in there

    • @RonaldoDiaz-v2z
      @RonaldoDiaz-v2z 8 месяцев назад

      if the SARB033 had sapphire at 1/3 the price this totally should.

  • @mdjmurray
    @mdjmurray 11 месяцев назад +1

    Just how much more scratch prone is hardlex compared to sapphire?

    • @anonymouswatchguy4223
      @anonymouswatchguy4223  11 месяцев назад +1

      Hardlex has a rating of 7 versus 9 for sapphire…it’s pretty scratch resistant too..but obviously sapphire is better and other brands give it to you at the same price point

  • @adzilla1985
    @adzilla1985 Год назад

    Anyone know of anyone doing a replacement sapphire crystal to fit as a mod?

  • @stephenbridges2791
    @stephenbridges2791 6 месяцев назад

    It's only 50m (5ATM) not 100m.

  • @thinredline2795
    @thinredline2795 Год назад +2

    Does anyone know the point of having a bezel that doesn't move? Is this just Seiko cutting corners/saving money?

    • @SampleTracks2224
      @SampleTracks2224 Год назад +2

      Ask Rolex. Their Explorer 2 is the same. Guess they couldn't manage a rotating bezel for 10 large 😊

    • @pushslice
      @pushslice 10 месяцев назад +1

      For a GMT, a rotating bezel simply gives you an option to track a THIRD time zone . although IMO it’s a bit convoluted to use , especially in light of the rarity someone seriously wants to track a third time zone. That probably explains why its inclusion is more the exception than the rule with GMTs…

    • @TheAscendedbeings
      @TheAscendedbeings 6 месяцев назад +1

      The design and use does not require a rotating bezel; watches are not fidget spinners

    • @thinredline2795
      @thinredline2795 6 месяцев назад

      @@TheAscendedbeings If you don't have anything intelligent or helpful to contribute please don't comment

  • @japanesewatchresearch
    @japanesewatchresearch Год назад +1

    すばらしい動画をありがとう
    日本より
    この時計はデザインの完成度高くて素晴らしいと思います

  • @edmundsmarr97
    @edmundsmarr97 9 месяцев назад

    Seiko hardlex is actually very good and durable I prefer it over Sapphire simply because on black and blue dials, the smudges and smears do not stand out like on Sapphire something I really hate

  • @simonwright6882
    @simonwright6882 Год назад +1

    As stylish and classy looking piece. I wish they would stop using that clasp. Not enough adjustment.

  • @RandallSlick
    @RandallSlick Год назад +1

    Decent review of a nearly-attractive watch hampered by a ridiculous height. When will Seiko discover finesse? I won't hold my breath.