Russia’s New Il-96-400M Stretch Takes Its 1st Flight

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 янв 2025

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @estraume
    @estraume Год назад +864

    Is this more fuel efficient than the A340? Or maybe, the right question: Does fuel efficiency even matter in Russia?

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 Год назад +174

      erm...Engines Made in Russia...what do you think?! 😂😂

    • @filledwithvariousknowledge2747
      @filledwithvariousknowledge2747 Год назад +47

      @@swanvictor887Much worse

    • @redbull1826
      @redbull1826 Год назад +110

      @@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 they made new engines they are pretty good on paper and judging by that they are going to be used its safe tos ay they are more efficient then the older engines they used

    • @Delta_NWAB747fan
      @Delta_NWAB747fan Год назад +122

      I don’t think it matters. The only customers will be Russian airlines and Cubana, they just want Russian built jets and I don’t think they care about that.

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 Год назад +71

      Doesn't matter, the A340 is mostly retired and this thing wont even be able to compete with anything the west makes at this point. Russia is behind by 30 years.

  • @EuropeanRailfanAlt
    @EuropeanRailfanAlt Год назад +292

    Russia has to start making more domestically made aircraft since it can't depend on Western aircraft/parts anymore due to sanctions.

    • @d.b.cooper1
      @d.b.cooper1 Год назад +35

      Riveting analysis

    • @Frank71
      @Frank71 Год назад +11

      ​@@d.b.cooper1
      You'll be surprised how many miss that.

    • @edc1569
      @edc1569 Год назад +12

      Problem is modern jets are really really complicated, the material science is in another dimension. Russia can’t complete all by themselves.

    • @Frisher1
      @Frisher1 Год назад +6

      ​@@edc1569Which is why you can just hire good engineers or engineers from different countries/ ex engineers from companies to do that for you, it's not like they can't do that

    • @ethercruiser1537
      @ethercruiser1537 Год назад

      Exactly

  • @bigmungus4864
    @bigmungus4864 Год назад +94

    Didn’t know their are so many aircraft experts in the chat 😂

    • @jojocactus7815
      @jojocactus7815 11 месяцев назад +4

      Probably they were part of the project, that's why they knew it.😆

    • @Zerpentsa6598
      @Zerpentsa6598 11 месяцев назад +1

      They have designed countless jet planes and flown them. Didn't you know?😂😂😂

    • @Star737_yt
      @Star737_yt 9 месяцев назад

      @@Zerpentsa6598 like the supersonic one crashing during the airshow?

    • @SN57ONE
      @SN57ONE 6 месяцев назад

      I mean, it is your country only. You guys tend to think you know better than everyone.

    • @lastmanstanding9389
      @lastmanstanding9389 5 месяцев назад

      @@Star737_yt like concorde?

  • @peterkrey7273
    @peterkrey7273 Год назад +126

    Love the quad! Have gotten bored with nothing but twins and miss the originals. Retro? Yes, but to me, beautiful.

    • @Rusich945
      @Rusich945 Год назад +4

      4 engines, it's safer dude

    • @januarioqueiroz3122
      @januarioqueiroz3122 11 месяцев назад

      You bet! I did Love it too!😊

    • @alexv1269
      @alexv1269 10 месяцев назад +4

      Bigger planes have 4 engines

  • @stradivarioushardhiantz5179
    @stradivarioushardhiantz5179 Год назад +216

    45m cabin length......while A340-200 has 46m

    • @CheapBastard1988
      @CheapBastard1988 Год назад +59

      😂 And that's the short one with CFM engines!

    • @DiminishingAugmentation
      @DiminishingAugmentation Год назад +22

      Wrong. It's 63.93m, very close to the A340-300's 63.69m

    • @hamslice863
      @hamslice863 Год назад +39

      Cabin length and fuselage length are two different things@@DiminishingAugmentation

    • @tayikolla6205
      @tayikolla6205 Год назад

      Yes. But the Russian plane has two genders only.

    • @PenskePC17
      @PenskePC17 11 месяцев назад +1

      Spooky

  • @fata__morgana
    @fata__morgana Год назад +84

    I love this, make planes weird again. Kinda bored with a320s and 737s...

    • @slamtilt01
      @slamtilt01 Год назад

      That's what I loved about the old Soviet Union era aircraft. They looked so strange. It was like Boeing, Lockheed and BOAC knew that the KGB had infiltrated their companies. So they purposefully made up plans for their spies to find. Once they got the bogus plans back behind the iron curtain. They soon realized the problem, but they made them work anyway.

    • @getv1973
      @getv1973 Год назад

      yes build more yu.....

    • @lv7603
      @lv7603 Год назад +6

      It’s comes down to fuel efficiency weirdness isn’t profitable which is why they have no place.

    • @pedropalotes7638
      @pedropalotes7638 Год назад +2

      ​@@lv7603no place? Why are B-747 and A-340 in service yet? In 2019 or 2020 even were announced new orders of B-747

    • @EJayMD-11
      @EJayMD-11 Год назад +4

      ​@@pedropalotes7638LMFAO. Who's gonna tell him?

  • @rodolfoptx
    @rodolfoptx Год назад +287

    Staying with four engines probably means some trust and thrust issues 😂

    • @julienckjm7430
      @julienckjm7430 Год назад +39

      Why do others have 2 engines? Why don't they just keep one single engine after all if there is so much trust and thrust?

    • @aro8000
      @aro8000 Год назад +57

      @@julienckjm7430 More engines - more safety - more flexibility - higher production costs - higher operating costs - higher noise - higher environmental pollution.

    • @jasonbass908
      @jasonbass908 Год назад +33

      Another gas guzzler
      If the IL 96 was any good Aeroflot would still be useing them the only commercial airline still useing it is CUBANA and the only reason they are is because they can't get anything to replace it

    • @Grivian
      @Grivian Год назад +9

      @@julienckjm7430 Redundancy. Same reason why humans have two of almost anything

    • @Fra93TheGrande
      @Fra93TheGrande Год назад

      LOL

  • @jakl2369
    @jakl2369 Год назад +135

    Beautiful plane. Quad jets always look better and safer. I love the short sharp nose.

    • @howlr747
      @howlr747 Год назад +4

      You think this outdated junk with old engines, old fuselage, old systems is 'safe'? Good luck with that one.

    • @Rusich945
      @Rusich945 Год назад +20

      @@howlr747 do you mean the 1967 Boeing 737?

    • @darkfatality570
      @darkfatality570 11 месяцев назад +9

      ​@@howlr747 Boeing IS Better????
      😂😂😂😂
      Not now

    • @yolomcswaggens9482
      @yolomcswaggens9482 10 месяцев назад +4

      @howlr747 My guy you're lagging some 30 years

    • @BaronEvola123
      @BaronEvola123 6 месяцев назад +1

      That's a myth. Look it up. 2 engines mean less problems.

  • @thexchox1554
    @thexchox1554 Год назад +215

    I love the Il-96. At least the Cubana and Aeroflot versions I flew on. Comfy and love the air vent in front of me! Hopefully this one will have better IFE and WiFi maybe!

    • @benjicool2808
      @benjicool2808 Год назад +22

      wifi hahah

    • @thexchox1554
      @thexchox1554 Год назад +16

      @@benjicool2808 Well to be fair… most airlines in North America are only getting it now.

    • @Jaso007
      @Jaso007 Год назад +3

      ​@@benjicool2808are you laughing about western over prized craps,?

    • @rocketman1058
      @rocketman1058 Год назад +1

      russian planes will never have WiFi

    • @thexchox1554
      @thexchox1554 Год назад +3

      @@rocketman1058 Some already do though…

  • @harstoft
    @harstoft Год назад +268

    36 years later Russia releases the A340

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones Год назад +87

      A340 is made by several European countries. Russia made this plane alone. Only US and Russia can do that.

    • @southside2459
      @southside2459 Год назад +37

      @@evelinamillionesyou didn’t get the joke

    • @wadehiggins1114
      @wadehiggins1114 Год назад +6

      ​@@southside2459she/him shim is american

    • @southside2459
      @southside2459 Год назад +9

      @@wadehiggins1114 I don’t get your joke

    • @chakraborty1989
      @chakraborty1989 Год назад +9

      Tell me you know nothing about IL96 without telling you know nothing about IL96

  • @imranzaki3687
    @imranzaki3687 Год назад +20

    What is the performance of the power plants? Service ceiling? Range? Maintenance cycle? Operating cost on short and long hauls…?

    • @Zerpentsa6598
      @Zerpentsa6598 11 месяцев назад +3

      Why? Are you thinking of buying one?

    • @lastmanstanding9389
      @lastmanstanding9389 5 месяцев назад

      Better than the rubbish Pratt & Whitney

  • @muhammadaslamtariq8035
    @muhammadaslamtariq8035 Год назад +77

    It is based on basic IL-86 aircraft produced by Russia in 1980 for Olympic-1980 games held in Moscow

    • @nts821
      @nts821 Год назад +44

      737 is in production since 60s.

    • @sdaiwepm
      @sdaiwepm Год назад +13

      The Olympics that popularized Adidas in Russia!

    • @DannoAviation
      @DannoAviation Год назад +9

      It’s based on the IL-96.

    • @quangminhnguyen2504
      @quangminhnguyen2504 Год назад +1

      The other way around@@DannoAviation

  • @Pilot-2020
    @Pilot-2020 Год назад +137

    I wouldn't be surprised if russias aviation industry will look like it did in the 1970's once again

    • @harrisonofcolorado8886
      @harrisonofcolorado8886 Год назад +18

      If that also means more crashes than the entire 737 series 3 fold, then I also expect that too if Russia's aviation industry turns back to the 1970s.

    • @Rusich945
      @Rusich945 Год назад

      clown are you blind? the Russian plane is superior to its competitors and therefore will never be allowed into the West

    • @arvedludwig3584
      @arvedludwig3584 Год назад +4

      Doubt it. Their workforce is rapidly decreasing.

    • @TheRVSN
      @TheRVSN Год назад +24

      @@arvedludwig3584 How can workforce be decreasing (with constant technology) while production is increasing?

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 Год назад +1

      @@Rusich945 Superior, by what? Tell me.

  • @Comrade_Alex_228
    @Comrade_Alex_228 Год назад +31

    Fun fact: first version of IL-96 (without the modification) take his first fly in 1988, Soo al who say what is IL-96 is airbus A340, is wrong

    • @alisastebuklu8618
      @alisastebuklu8618 11 дней назад +1

      Of course it is not. Not even close. This is flying tin can compared to boing or airbus

  • @FirestarterAJ12
    @FirestarterAJ12 Год назад +93

    Wow, those engines look like they are from the 70s

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones Год назад +43

      They are military and super reliable

    • @maestromecanico597
      @maestromecanico597 Год назад +25

      The whole plane looks like its from the 70s.

    • @brittsaunders4621
      @brittsaunders4621 Год назад +21

      Actually, the PS90A turbofan engine "family" was developed by the Soloviev Design Bureau in the mid-1980s. It was the Soviet Union's first commercial high bypass turbofan.

    • @thexchox1554
      @thexchox1554 Год назад +12

      @@brittsaunders4621 By that standard… you can say the Trent family was developed from the RB211’s of the 1970s

    • @karloarsch1579
      @karloarsch1579 Год назад +1

      @@maestromecanico597 Yes, minus the winglets...

  • @Caswell_Official
    @Caswell_Official 6 месяцев назад +3

    1999 called, it wants its airplane back

  • @tylerdurden4006
    @tylerdurden4006 Год назад +26

    I'm just here for the ridiculous american racism that makes them think no one else in the world is capable of technology of any kind. 🤷🤣

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 Год назад +5

      Russia is capable of technology... of the 90s

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 Год назад +14

      @@azurefire7266 thank you proving me right about american racism. 👏

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 Год назад +2

      @@azurefire7266 immediately

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 Год назад +10

      @@azurefire7266 nevermind america uses bombers from the early 50's

    • @moekitsune
      @moekitsune Год назад +1

      ​@@tylerdurden4006They only use them because they've done extensive modernizations.

  • @mughug9616
    @mughug9616 4 месяца назад +2

    Sounds like these could be existing un-used Il-96-400T cargo versions converted to carry passagers. No indication these are new constructions. Most likely because of the embargo and Russian not being able to access Boeing or Airbus aircraft and parts. Both versions use Russian made electronics, etc.

  • @bikingmoments
    @bikingmoments Год назад +87

    I’m hoping its aged platform can mean more reliability and won’t kill too many people.

    • @MODECHARLIE
      @MODECHARLIE Год назад +72

      The IL86/96 platform has never killed anybody.

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 Год назад +21

      Good point and here's the there were no fatal accidents involving the airframe on the other hand the Airbus equivalent A330/A340 family had serious accidents.

    • @johnstuartsmith
      @johnstuartsmith Год назад +44

      @@EpicThe112 In the last 35 years, only 33 il-96s have ever been made, while Airbus has delivered over 1,800 330s and 340s. The fewer airplanes, the lesser the chances of airplane accidents.

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 Год назад +7

      @@MODECHARLIE true...but there again, they don't fly much, do they...?!

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 Год назад

      @@johnstuartsmith Thanks for telling me about that

  • @ramatgan1
    @ramatgan1 Год назад +87

    Russia makes its own cars, ships, planes, tanks, missiles everything you can think of they make it.
    The country is amazing.
    Watching from Somalia.

    • @Dave-du4xw
      @Dave-du4xw Год назад +2

      Then Why Do Russians Have To Steal Toilets And Washing Machines From Ukraine??? Ha, Ha

    • @irokpe6977
      @irokpe6977 Год назад +1

      Lol. They can't compete globally like the Japanese, Chinese and Americans

    • @jean-vincent7830
      @jean-vincent7830 Год назад

      Egypt and Turkey are also watching trust me my somalian brother, the corruption and fraud are real

    • @jeanpierrelaolou5490
      @jeanpierrelaolou5490 11 месяцев назад

      Yes, cars, computer, cellphone everything.

    • @weskolodziej
      @weskolodziej 8 месяцев назад +6

      @@jeanpierrelaolou5490 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @christopherzhao3135
    @christopherzhao3135 Год назад +16

    4 engine, 3 flight crews… feels like 1980s instead of 2023

    • @DanMaverick22
      @DanMaverick22 Год назад +4

      More safety, I approve.

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 Год назад +5

      @@DanMaverick22this isn’t about safety

    • @Otto_M
      @Otto_M Год назад +1

      ​@@Sedna063 дело...

  • @juanpablocorreiaecheverria2857
    @juanpablocorreiaecheverria2857 Год назад +33

    Welcome to the 1980s Russia!

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones Год назад +25

      Does your country produce planes on its own? In 2023

    • @abissuminvocat
      @abissuminvocat Год назад +4

      You are not welcome.

    • @hansloyalitat9774
      @hansloyalitat9774 Год назад +17

      You do realize most of the planes you fly in the west were originally designed in the 60s-80s?

    • @dylan8389
      @dylan8389 Год назад +5

      @@evelinamilliones Is the Russian bot’s feelings hurt by its own country’s hilarious incompetence at building anything?

    • @beibotanov
      @beibotanov Год назад

      @@dylan8389 thanks to the sanctioning, this incompetence is to be overcame at least in critical sectors. Demand creates supply! And workforce deficit makes blue-collar wages soar.

  • @skivijimmy
    @skivijimmy Год назад +36

    I equate Russian technology to that of Klingon technology in the Star Trek universe. It works but it's crude

    • @harstoft
      @harstoft Год назад +13

      Plus it’s mostly stolen!

    • @abissuminvocat
      @abissuminvocat Год назад

      @@harstoft The West stole 600 billion state reserves from Russia. Themselves are fools.

    • @princesofthepower3690
      @princesofthepower3690 Год назад +9

      @@harstofttired old trope at this point.

    • @yuratg
      @yuratg 6 месяцев назад +1

      Stop reading comics and it will pass

  • @Yassified3425
    @Yassified3425 Год назад +61

    Ticket prices due to fuel burn will probably be higher now, unless the state starts ticket subsidies.

    • @Sanyu-Tumusiime
      @Sanyu-Tumusiime Год назад +12

      It's probably the only option for Russians to travel. People WILL pay the higher prices, if it's their sole option. Besides, that profits that this company Ilyushin makes can be used to develop better aircraft.
      Russia will once again dominate aviation.

    • @bradlemmond
      @bradlemmond Год назад +21

      ​@@Sanyu-Tumusiime😂😂😂

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 Год назад +5

      @@Sanyu-Tumusiime 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 Год назад +3

      I'm guessing it fly's by burning old cooking-fat oil, collected from restaurants and cafes lol

    • @anggergalih3414
      @anggergalih3414 Год назад

      @@swanvictor887 clown even west europe have their energy supply from russia. they have plenty oil you uneducated people.

  • @eduardjacob8710
    @eduardjacob8710 Год назад +14

    100% Russo ! All parts made in Rússia !

    • @howlr747
      @howlr747 Год назад +1

      So avoid! Do not fly on this junk!

  • @lolwhat36
    @lolwhat36 Год назад +7

    it looks so short but long at the same time lmao

    • @edgarguinartlopez8341
      @edgarguinartlopez8341 Год назад +1

      It is pretty wide, maybe is that. Over 6 meters, I think.

    • @tetraxis3011
      @tetraxis3011 8 месяцев назад

      Could be cuz Russian companies like to make their vertical stabilizers Huge.

  • @EpicThe112
    @EpicThe112 Год назад +48

    I wonder who's going to get this outside of Russia and my guesses are Cuba possibly Iran and North Korea. For Cubana this might work to replace their 2007 vintage IL-96-300 additionally Irkut MS-21-310s to replace their Tu-204s if Sanctions are lifted MS-21-300 with PW1400G

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones Год назад +20

      Arabic, Indian, Chinese people

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 Год назад

      @@evelinamillionesno

    • @марат-т7щ5п
      @марат-т7щ5п Год назад

      Пиндос,ты думал что ты властелин мира?

    • @fulger2010
      @fulger2010 Год назад +17

      @@BabaBol9 there will be the day when the Russian airspace (the most valuable airspace between eastern asia - europe and north america - whole asia) will be allowed only with the Russian made aicrafts ... checkmate!

    • @evgen-cy6so
      @evgen-cy6so Год назад +15

      American rockets with Russian engines - RD 180 to this day! Americans don’t complain and even ask that the RD-180 not be included in the sanctions!

  • @kingdomgateway7677
    @kingdomgateway7677 Год назад +8

    I love the plane and I need one.

  • @lv7603
    @lv7603 Год назад +24

    Fuel efficiency is boss. I like tri jets but understand why they aren’t popular among carriers.

    • @ВгостяхуСантаса
      @ВгостяхуСантаса Год назад +12

      Russia has its own cheap fuel...

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 Год назад +1

      @@ВгостяхуСантасаand so?

    • @user-fckyoutubeshit
      @user-fckyoutubeshit Год назад

      It could be cheap only in aviation for jet fuel. Because in gas stations fuel is up to hell prices expensive and not profitable for people cause to bustard government trying to be against of the world and people: native and foreign

    • @player1GR
      @player1GR Год назад +1

      Russian oil is the boss

  • @DavidScott-e5m
    @DavidScott-e5m Год назад +2

    Still flying 4 engine jets?

  • @AltDavidMiscavige
    @AltDavidMiscavige Год назад +16

    It’ll probably still lack overhead bins in the middle 😂

  • @somdattsable5540
    @somdattsable5540 Год назад +2

    Why the engine haven't upgraded yet ??

    • @artip777
      @artip777 5 месяцев назад

      Old model PS-90A will change for PD-35 engines. While in testing by now.

  • @notedigominombre947
    @notedigominombre947 Год назад +33

    Tipical in Russia: "The brand new very old thing"

    • @bloodst0rm1337
      @bloodst0rm1337 Год назад +28

      Welp, most popular Boeing and Airbus models are ancient design too. Just cause why would you change something that works perfectly right?

    • @cnn787-i9e
      @cnn787-i9e Год назад

      Brainwashed

    • @TS-ct4sp5kh2d
      @TS-ct4sp5kh2d 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@bloodst0rm1337 👍

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv 10 месяцев назад +9

      Like brand new 1960s 737 max?
      Or the brand new 320neo from the 80s?

  • @jhons2696
    @jhons2696 Год назад +51

    To me, four engines suggests they don't trust the engines enough to only have two.

    • @thealtchemist.x
      @thealtchemist.x Год назад +39

      They don't have engines that are powerful enough to use just two. The engines on this 400M are the equivalent of the PW2000's

    • @julienckjm7430
      @julienckjm7430 Год назад +6

      Why not have only one engine if there is so much trust then?

    • @tupolev12
      @tupolev12 Год назад

      They will probably re engine it with the PD-35

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 Год назад

      @@julienckjm7430use your brain

    • @jettrd_utilitychnl4230
      @jettrd_utilitychnl4230 Год назад +1

      this airfraime was engineered for 4. And I'm all for it ! ))

  • @rosisrosarum643
    @rosisrosarum643 10 месяцев назад +7

    This new IL-96-400M aircraft was equipped with four PS90A engines that already existed but in future could be equipped with the new PD35 engines that are under development and in this case only two engines will be used.

  • @muhammadaslamtariq8035
    @muhammadaslamtariq8035 Год назад +5

    The four engine option is no more ideal due more maintenance cost and higher fuel consumption

    • @marxxmann8758
      @marxxmann8758 Год назад +8

      It's more trustworthy than the twin engine especially crossing vast stretches of water

    • @tenton459
      @tenton459 Год назад +2

      Safety.

    • @tenton459
      @tenton459 Год назад +4

      A380 using 4.

    • @Rehunauris
      @Rehunauris Год назад +1

      @@tenton459 A340 was designed in 1980s.
      Since you edited your message I'll do the same: A380 is no longer in production.

    • @tenton459
      @tenton459 Год назад +3

      @@Rehunauris A380 is back, I believe...

  • @alexx86hater
    @alexx86hater Год назад +22

    Il-96 was outdated design even by the early 90th standards (when it entered production). By today's standards it's just ancient design. Pretty sure when there are going to be talks of actually buying it Aeroflot would try to get out of the deal by stalling the deal with additional requirements like they do now with Tu-204.

    • @eemtech1606
      @eemtech1606 Год назад +1

      Due to the four engines?

    • @hansloyalitat9774
      @hansloyalitat9774 Год назад

      They have no other choice, cant buy western planes.

    • @SeanMirrsen
      @SeanMirrsen Год назад +9

      What exactly about its airframe is so outdated? Or what, do you think it's still got soviet-era internals and materials?

    • @x-gamessimulator1067
      @x-gamessimulator1067 Год назад +10

      Ru$$ia is the only country that can make airplanes independently.
      Airbus and Boeing outsource many of their components.
      Incredibly, despite the sanctions, they still manage to do something unique!
      😎

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k Год назад +1

      @@x-gamessimulator1067 doing like 3 per year

  • @davidh9844
    @davidh9844 4 месяца назад +2

    Congratulations to the Russians for re-inventing the A340-200.

    • @Isz2134
      @Isz2134 3 месяца назад

      400. Pls keep up with conversation 😂

  • @jackdoe3889
    @jackdoe3889 Год назад +9

    Great. Now return the 700+ aircraft you stole.

    • @Стратегическийвыбор
      @Стратегическийвыбор Год назад +5

      Who stole?

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k Год назад

      @@Стратегическийвыбор russian terrorist state

    • @beibotanov
      @beibotanov Год назад +6

      When the owner refuses to take your money for his things caught in circumstances and cant' be returned - very strange, very Western definition of theft

    • @Стратегическийвыбор
      @Стратегическийвыбор Год назад +3

      ​@@beibotanovда они просто гопники, которые не на того напали.

    • @Стратегическийвыбор
      @Стратегическийвыбор Год назад

      Чучело, ты за базар отвечать собираешься? Или ты, как ваши тупые лидеры, вякнул и в кусты?

  • @sikkzakk
    @sikkzakk Год назад +20

    Kinda looks like its from the 80's...

    • @obroni
      @obroni Год назад +15

      Because it is.

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv 10 месяцев назад +5

      Because it is, like A320 and a340.
      But still at least not from the 60s, like the 737.

  • @BillyCrabtree-ob6py
    @BillyCrabtree-ob6py Год назад +6

    2:55 BUTTER

  • @bonecracker97
    @bonecracker97 4 месяца назад +1

    The Engines seem quite a bit different. Much lower bypass ratio than the ones used by boeing and airbus

  • @olpkol
    @olpkol Год назад +3

    What is the "Ukrainian crisis of 2014"?
    Do you mean Moscow's annexation of the Donbass and Crimea?

    • @beibotanov
      @beibotanov Год назад +2

      So what should have been done? Russia had to withdraw itself from everything to have what, the NATO fleet in Sevastopol?

    • @paulj2948
      @paulj2948 2 месяца назад

      Like the "2022 Ukraine situation."

  • @fredferd965
    @fredferd965 9 месяцев назад +2

    Compare the standard Il-96 against Western aircraft. It doesn't stand up! It's heavy, it's crude, it is inferior.

    • @MrSchwabentier
      @MrSchwabentier 9 месяцев назад

      Yeah but since russian airlines can’t buy western aircraft it doesn’t matter if it’s inferior

  • @miketel01
    @miketel01 Год назад +10

    Wow the engines look pretty low bypass

    • @supa3ek
      @supa3ek 11 месяцев назад

      So does your brain !

  • @awu92
    @awu92 3 месяца назад +1

    Other videos ought to introduce the internal facilities & the service level of flight attendant of Russian Airlines.

  • @francikaa1
    @francikaa1 Год назад +3

    When I saw 2 engines on one side in the thumbnail, I was hoping it's just clickbait, but unfortunately not.

  • @countbenjamin1442
    @countbenjamin1442 Год назад +1

    How easy will it be to get replacement parts

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 Год назад +4

      if they order now...they promise to deliver on friday afternoon...on the 12 December....2038....the day before your dentist apointment....

    • @edisonz2006
      @edisonz2006 Год назад +5

      Considering it's entirely domestic-made, probably not that hard

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@swanvictor887 😂

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 месяцев назад

      It's totally domestic, so on point and fast

  • @edc1569
    @edc1569 Год назад +4

    I’m sure the Iranians will buy some.

    • @Orf-dy7hr
      @Orf-dy7hr 7 месяцев назад +1

      Inchallah

    • @yuratg
      @yuratg 6 месяцев назад

      It's very expensive

    • @angryralphs2516
      @angryralphs2516 3 месяца назад

      ​@@yuratgit is made in 1 place. I think it is cheaper. No imported parts needed.

  • @theregnarute
    @theregnarute 11 месяцев назад

    does it come with plug-in doors?

  • @irandoosty
    @irandoosty Год назад +5

    Thank you I stick with Boeing and Airbus.

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 Год назад

      You have that option.
      Russia does NOT due to sanctions.

    • @yuratg
      @yuratg 6 месяцев назад

      They don't offer it to you

  • @pavan151
    @pavan151 Год назад +39

    So many haters in the comments but I love that this has 4 engines and was created in the modern age when everyone else goes 2 engine. What would the range on this aircraft be?

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 Год назад +21

      You may love it, but airlines are interested in twinjets. The 80s are over, mate.
      Range is 5400 nm, so below average for modern widebodies.

    • @gregmiller7123
      @gregmiller7123 Год назад +3

      The range is all the way to the crash site! 🤔

    • @johnstone7697
      @johnstone7697 Год назад +6

      You're asking about range with 4 old fashioned engines? How quaint.

    • @dennisrettke
      @dennisrettke Год назад +12

      It's all political because they've been told that Russia is "bad" (meanwhile, USA and Israel are "good", right?). Real aviation enthusiasts love this development and I'm sure would love to fly on one, myself included.

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 Год назад +11

      @@dennisrettke There is nothing political about this, the plane is not up for todays standards.

  • @gorgeouscfso
    @gorgeouscfso Год назад +48

    hope russian aviation can be back on its feet once again. always love those giant planes.

    • @DavidOfWhitehills
      @DavidOfWhitehills Год назад +21

      Yeah, that's Ukraine you're thinking of.

    • @GrimYak
      @GrimYak Год назад +12

      if you are thinking antonov thats ukraine.

    • @joe91IM
      @joe91IM Год назад +24

      ​@@DavidOfWhitehillsthat's not ukraine to be honest..that's USSR.

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 Год назад +3

      @@joe91IMand now Ukraine

    • @dennisrettke
      @dennisrettke Год назад +9

      @@DavidOfWhitehills nothing to do with Ukraine, apart from the physical location.

  • @bobtheirish79
    @bobtheirish79 9 месяцев назад +1

    Beautiful aircraft

  • @joydasgupta9445
    @joydasgupta9445 Год назад +4

    Great news! It will help the world from the duopoly that's at present.

  • @ravishingboltchand1320
    @ravishingboltchand1320 18 дней назад

    Why 4 engines?

  • @kingnat4874
    @kingnat4874 Год назад +11

    Is it just me or does it looks abit like the a340?

    • @spitfiremkiv339
      @spitfiremkiv339 Год назад +27

      funnily enough, the plane it's based on (Ilyushin 86) had been flying since before the A340 was even produced.

    • @kingnat4874
      @kingnat4874 Год назад +7

      @@spitfiremkiv339 Omg so does it means airbus copied them ?😂

    • @MODECHARLIE
      @MODECHARLIE Год назад +6

      Lol the A340 looks like it

    • @federico339
      @federico339 Год назад +6

      ​@@kingnat4874more like, this is how any standard moden-ish tubeliner with 4 engines would look

    • @kingnat4874
      @kingnat4874 Год назад

      @@federico339 ohh okay

  • @arissulistyo3304
    @arissulistyo3304 Год назад +1

    4 engines are out date

  • @Biganeworldwide
    @Biganeworldwide Год назад +3

    4 jet engines means more oparating costs

  • @paulj2948
    @paulj2948 2 месяца назад +1

    A plane that was obsolete before ever built in the 1980s is made again. Wonderful financial decision!

  • @matsism
    @matsism Год назад +5

    Lovely!

  • @robertphillips2983
    @robertphillips2983 Год назад +2

    I like it, looks good.

  • @peterwong4779
    @peterwong4779 Год назад +12

    Humankind air travel shouldn’t monopoly by Boeing & Airbus,, Welcome Russia , China and Another Country come to developing aircraft for Humankind

    • @amadeusendymion1272
      @amadeusendymion1272 5 месяцев назад +1

      Russian, humankind, those are two words that should never be used in the same sentence.

  • @hdiallo2008
    @hdiallo2008 Год назад +1

    Congrutalions !

  • @amertestas5044
    @amertestas5044 Год назад +6

    "New"

  • @wesellanybiz
    @wesellanybiz Год назад

    Couldn’t they fit just 2 engines? Any reason they selected 4?

    • @MrSchwabentier
      @MrSchwabentier Год назад +4

      The base model is a 4 engine plane, you can’t change that easily. Also there is no engine available that’s powerful enough to

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k Год назад +1

      They've built it with spared parts available

  • @nomoreshreksadsadsad
    @nomoreshreksadsadsad Год назад +8

    looks cool! i want one!

  • @Григорий-Старцев-97
    @Григорий-Старцев-97 Месяц назад

    The Il-96 is an improved Il-86 aircraft, the Il-86 has never crashed in 39,000 flights, and although the Il-96 could fly 18 hours and 9 minutes without refueling, the service life of its engines since the early 90s was too small compared to foreign-made engines, and the Soviet airline Aeroflot after the collapse of the USSR became a business corporation that chose what was profitable, this was before 1994, and the airline began to choose Boeing and Airbus aircraft, and today in Russia they are creating new engines of different power and with a good service life and active production of Il-96 aircraft can resume, until now this aircraft has transported mainly Russian presidents, Boris Yeltsin, Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin

  • @MurraydeLues
    @MurraydeLues Год назад +21

    First thing that crossed my mind. Modernised 707

    • @Orf-dy7hr
      @Orf-dy7hr 7 месяцев назад

      After 15 beers?

  • @bu_is
    @bu_is Год назад +2

    suitable for countries under years of heavy sanctions

  • @alexandergrigorov2594
    @alexandergrigorov2594 Год назад +3

    Maybe I miss it but what engine this starship is powered with?

  • @risdosagalavsjilong
    @risdosagalavsjilong 4 месяца назад

    can i order for private jet ?

  • @320_Crew
    @320_Crew Год назад +10

    4 engines, pretty cool!

  • @tiger629
    @tiger629 Год назад +1

    It's a good receiver of IL-86

  • @christopherescott6787
    @christopherescott6787 Год назад +34

    Welcome to 1986.

    • @timb4098
      @timb4098 Год назад +5

      Il-96 first flight was in September 1988.

  • @DavidLe-xw2qf
    @DavidLe-xw2qf Год назад

    does this plane need 3 or 4 crews to fly?

  • @connorgeorge6294
    @connorgeorge6294 Год назад +3

    Just like most things in Russia - it’s stuck in the past

  • @puftepos
    @puftepos Год назад +1

    4 engines with the current oil pricing and with the fierce competition from the twin engine aircrafts;
    Shorter than the competition's aircrafts;
    Less passengers than the competition's aircraft.
    Yeah, the soviet success story. :))))

  • @jeanpierreburel6606
    @jeanpierreburel6606 Год назад +3

    At least , it's NOT American !

  • @ce1834
    @ce1834 Год назад +1

    Straight outta the 90s lol

  • @rdanielh78
    @rdanielh78 Год назад +8

    Looks like it is the best airplane maker in the world. No other country has done it on its own.

    • @SouthJerseyTransitFan
      @SouthJerseyTransitFan Год назад

      Aka Boeing 747

    • @superdingo9741
      @superdingo9741 Год назад +4

      The USA used to do it on its own. In ol' good days...

    • @rdanielh78
      @rdanielh78 Год назад

      @superdingo9741 Yeah, those simple times, very little technology. You about the time when the first supersonic passenger plane was made all by Russia or earlier?

    • @kowalskidiazdegeras9190
      @kowalskidiazdegeras9190 Год назад +5

      Remember when in the 1970's a newly formed conglomerate of small european plane makers made the very first TWIN engine widebody? Yes, without the help of Boeing nor Douglas.
      Ilushin is almost 50 years out of date

  • @YouDingo88
    @YouDingo88 Год назад +2

    I hope this time it will be ready for the 1980 Moscow Olympics.

  • @Romeojulietless
    @Romeojulietless Год назад +34

    Well done to them. They have achieved their own modern wide body aircraft where most other developed countries have failed, and without the need for various nations building various parts of the structure 👍

    • @oldowleye3161
      @oldowleye3161 Год назад +9

      lol... ignorance is bold !... 4 engines were done looooooooooong time ago and are not in use anymore for 20 years (exception made to the very large A380) !... if you know nothing about this topic, better no to comment !...

    • @Romeojulietless
      @Romeojulietless Год назад

      I wanted to give u a detailed answer about aviation, my experience and jet engines history .. but decided against wasting my time @@oldowleye3161

    • @superdingo9741
      @superdingo9741 Год назад +9

      @@oldowleye3161 could you enumerate countries which achieved that?

    • @oldowleye3161
      @oldowleye3161 Год назад +4

      @@superdingo9741 ...don't cry bot

    • @scarecrow108productions7
      @scarecrow108productions7 Год назад

      ​@@oldowleye3161he's probably one of those Vatniks.

  • @bluebull5633
    @bluebull5633 Год назад +2

    The perfect plane to replace the a350

  • @PakaBubi
    @PakaBubi Год назад +5

    Vodka burner is rolling lol.

  • @sdaiwepm
    @sdaiwepm Год назад +1

    Does it have brakes? Avionics? Engines?

    • @Otto_M
      @Otto_M Год назад +2

      Нет, ничего нет. Но он полетел

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 месяцев назад

      It uses levitation

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 месяцев назад

      What? Hell no. It's a flying tin. 😂

  • @DouglasDC10.30
    @DouglasDC10.30 Год назад +11

    I’d actually love to fly this!

    • @dennisrettke
      @dennisrettke Год назад

      @@Instasamps do you also joke about the 9/11 attacks?

    • @Instasamps
      @Instasamps Год назад

      @@dennisrettke no I don’t

    • @dennisrettke
      @dennisrettke Год назад

      @@Instasamps Then why make such comment? Do you think it's acceptable?

    • @Instasamps
      @Instasamps Год назад +2

      @@dennisrettke sorry karen

  • @mkunes2502
    @mkunes2502 Год назад +2

    One thing is guaranteed. The workers who built the plane, were drunk, much of the time. Feel safe? Hahaha!!

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 месяцев назад

      Sure. Drinking vodka, dancing kalinka, playing with bears and singing Katyusha 🎉

    • @mkunes2502
      @mkunes2502 9 месяцев назад

      @@ИраИванова-л4к You’ve been to the factory?!

  • @jaysonjose5675
    @jaysonjose5675 Год назад +7

    While the world is shifting to powerful twin engine jets, Russia is not concern to let say fuel efficiency.

    • @Max-xw3ou
      @Max-xw3ou Год назад +3

      You did not hear the author right. These engines are modified ones, more efficient.

    • @rickymwamba9681
      @rickymwamba9681 Год назад +1

      They are more fuel efficient than the twin engines!

    • @jaysonjose5675
      @jaysonjose5675 Год назад

      @@rickymwamba9681how?

    • @jaysonjose5675
      @jaysonjose5675 Год назад

      @@Max-xw3ouit might be more fuel efficient than its predecessor, but i guess current twin engines by rolls royce and GE are still more efficient

    • @Otto_M
      @Otto_M Год назад

      ​@@jaysonjose5675а ты не думай, тебе это вредно.

  • @hj8272
    @hj8272 Год назад +2

    Third world countries are waiting patiently for this soviet technological miracle. Afghanistan and other industrialized countries can finally stop using camels and donkeys.
    BTW, I have $100 to invest. Can I buy two of those 'airplanes'?

    • @АлексейЕрёменко-е7ю8ц
      @АлексейЕрёменко-е7ю8ц 4 месяца назад

      Ты можешь купить себе пару резиновых дилдо... А на остальные ведро вазелина - и развлекаться

  • @mirekslechta7161
    @mirekslechta7161 Год назад +8

    Beautiful resulth of mighty Russia !!!

    • @xdural6269
      @xdural6269 Год назад +3

      Jakou máte medikaci?

    • @mirekslechta7161
      @mirekslechta7161 4 месяца назад

      @@xdural6269 Co létajícího jste vyrobil Vy ? Pokud nic, tak proč neobdivujete tohle nádherné letadlo ? Jaké největší letadlo vyrábí , nebo vyráběl náš stát? Není to maličká a dnes už velmi zastaralá L 410 s turbovrtulovými motory ? Proč bych něsměl obdivovat lidi, kteří v krátké době navzdory sankcím dokázali vyrobit něco, co je evidentně na špičkové úrovni? Víte co? Táhněte do ............ !

  • @eleventy-seven
    @eleventy-seven Год назад +2

    Id trust flying on this more then the new Chinese marrow body.

  • @player1GR
    @player1GR Год назад +1

    cool but why can't you english speaking men call Russian planes correctly. it;s not "ai el 96", it's "il-96", like "eel"

  • @ДмитрийТарев
    @ДмитрийТарев Год назад +4

    Временный вариант для широкофюзеляжных

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 месяцев назад +2

      Не похоже что англоязычные комментаторы это понимают)

  • @markskanyt
    @markskanyt Год назад +2

    Who's gonna buy it outside of Russia?

  • @andrewshockley1256
    @andrewshockley1256 Год назад +5

    Lol, it's a nothing burger. Like its smaller variant, the 300, nobody beyond Russia and Cuba will buy it because it'll be inefficient, unreliable, and full of maintenance/parts supply problems. Another Russian flop.

  • @tommyx777
    @tommyx777 Год назад

    captain Serghei Sughkoch….was very impress with the plane they said.

  • @alexlong3714
    @alexlong3714 Год назад +5

    With cheap Russian Oil, it's does not matter about fuel cost, does it ? It will work for the Russian domestic market, no matter what.

    • @rodjarrow6575
      @rodjarrow6575 Год назад +1

      You are mistaken, because you have no idea about the new Russian aircraft engines of the series: PD-8; PD-10; PD-14; PD-35

  • @gezaeckrich6773
    @gezaeckrich6773 4 месяца назад

    Sehr schöne Flugzeug 👍

  • @jon00tz
    @jon00tz Год назад +8

    Ancient Soviet Cold War technology…….Don’t fly it over my house !

    • @Fay7666
      @Fay7666 Год назад +6

      Eh, I've heard good things about the Cubana planes which are only gonna turn 20 recently. It seems like they do take care of them (they kinda have to, considering they can't get replacements easily).

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k Год назад

      @@Fay7666 those planes have little little flight hours

    • @jettrd_utilitychnl4230
      @jettrd_utilitychnl4230 Год назад +3

      @@henson2k what are you talking about? they are always in the air mostly