You're absolutely right! The smaller block engines often prioritized higher revs and better tuning, which sometimes resulted in more power than the larger 7.2L engine. Quite an interesting aspect of the Interceptor
You're absolutely right-383 cubic inches actually equal 6.3 liters, not 5.3 liters. I apologize for the mistake, and thank you for pointing that out! I regret the error and will make sure to be more careful in the future. Your feedback helps me improve and create better content. Thanks again for your comment and for keeping me on my toes.
This would be a perfect sleeper.I’ve never seen one in the wild.
So the small block produced far more power than the big block??
You're absolutely right! The smaller block engines often prioritized higher revs and better tuning, which sometimes resulted in more power than the larger 7.2L engine. Quite an interesting aspect of the Interceptor
Litre, it's a British car.
@@stringer-ik1pc The engine size is in the engine, not the car body.
The engine is American.
@jashknap8804 The language spoken is 'English ' and in English it's litre.
@@stringer-ik1pc Sounds like an American accent to me.
383 cubic inch does not equal 5.3 liters.
Don't make videos if you don't know what you're talking about.
Sounds more like the 318 to me
You're absolutely right-383 cubic inches actually equal 6.3 liters, not 5.3 liters. I apologize for the mistake, and thank you for pointing that out! I regret the error and will make sure to be more careful in the future. Your feedback helps me improve and create better content. Thanks again for your comment and for keeping me on my toes.
You are rude!
@@curtvona4891 Ravishing Rick
Nice copy off the 1965 baracuda and her rear style ;)
Interesting observation! Both are definitely iconic designs of their time.
😂😂😂😂😂 typical yank.
Looks more like a 1955 sunbeam rapier. Typical yank 😂😂😂