Its crazy to see what the N64 could really do with its architecture and game file size. Most N64 games were just 8mb, 16mb some were bigger but when you see the storage on Sega Gd rom it makes it even more impressive.
"No game on this list is anywhere near that" lmao styopeed m0r0n, the 2nd game on the list Asteroids64 is actually 4MB, most N64 games are between 8-16MB, with only the top tier games being 32MB and a handful being 64MB, think before typing i know its hard sometimes...
The Dreamcast was basically a next-gen console released too early, it was giving us a hint on what Next-Gen Graphics was gonna look like when the 2000's hit!
The same is true of the N64 but all of its' competition was technologically inferior. The Dreamcast had to compete with systems superior to it after a brief moment of being the most technologically advanced system.
The Dreamcast was an exclusive experience to all the smart people who bought it, while the masses were waiting for the PS2. Even though the Dreamcast existed only for about 2 years it got a compatable classic game collection to the PS2, Xbox and GC. To me it still has the best games of that generation.
If they waited more, they'd got nothing to compete against ps2, or perhaps ps2 just came out at exactly the best time it could. Dreamcast could have been updated with the Naomi2 hardware, but at the time it was possible, Dreamcast got essentially discontinued, something not odd, given Sega's history of bad decisions, today, a Dreamcast Pro would have been released without issues.
@@epicon6I love the Dreamcast too and in some cases it had much better image quality than the PS2 but you've got to admit that it never really had any games on the same level as GTA 3, god of war or metal gear solid 2.
@@santitabnavascues8673Dreamcast no necesitaba actualizarse, de hecho hay en ciertos aspectos técnicos donde Dreamcast es superior a PS2. El tiempo en el que salió no es ni mejor ni peor simplemente no funciono comercialmente (por muchos motivos, sobretodo errores pasados) pero cuenta que todos los que tuvieron Dreamcast día uno, se dio un salto tecnológico con una diferencia impresionante un año antes (año y medio para los japoneses). Soul Calibur, Sonic Adventure, Crazy Taxi, Shenmue estaban a años luz de Playstation y N64. El ejemplo de que podría haber continuado a igualdad en la generación lo tienes en cuanto aprovecharon (sobretodo Xbox por el acuerdo con Sega) los demás sistemas tras su salida del mercado. Casi siempre el sistema más poderoso no fue el de más éxito, claro ejemplo con Switch actualmente.
The N64 had some serious design flaws, but those last years between 1999-2001 had some impressive games for the machine. Some of these look pretty similar which is insane knowing the difference in power! The N64 lived through the dreamcast's life and one year of PS2! Some games like DK64, perfect dark, Banjo-tooie, Pkmn stadium 2, majora's mask, Mario party 3 or conker's bad fur day felt bigger in content than many of the titles the others offered at the time
Some of these games looks similar on both platform because during it's lifetime the Dreamcast was largely held back by these overflowing of enhanched ports which were very cheap to make by the developers. If you take original Dreamcast games which use the real power of the machine like Shenmue or Resident Evil Code Veronica or DOA 2 not even Majoras Mask is even remotely comparable to them
Design flaws that include the onboard Texture Memory that weighed in at 4KB in size at the time, meant early N64 games had to be shrunken down in size to reduce the size and quality of the textures so that they would fit inside the onboard Texture memory. Followed by the unified architecture that was plagued by high access latency, in other words, the delay in time before a data transfer could occur. The type of memory implementation was RDRAM, which offered high bandwidth at a lower cost, but it had horrible latency to boot that programmers ultimately ignored storing textures on RAM due to horrible latency (640 ns).
RE2 on N64 was the first game in the series I played and to this day, it's still the most impressive port of a game in my opinion. At one point I had both the N64 and DC versions , but the fact that they were able to develop it and put it onto a single cartridge is technological sorcery.
It's an absolutely INSANE port. They managed some absolute black magic with that game by getting both discs of roughly 750-ish MB of data compressed down to only 64 MB of space on the cartridge. Bro that's 512 Mb. They managed to fit the entire two discs, PLUS EXTRA CONTENT down to 8.5% of its size, and in the process they remastered the audio and added Dolby surround support, and it's the only version to have those. It has the best audio version, ON CARTRIDGE. It's nuts man. The graphics are even better in some ways, such as actually having perspective correct textures on 3D models and higher resolutions at times, and worse in others like the FMV sequences and far lower resolution pre rendered backgrounds. But it's impressive on every single level.
I miss the days when a new console showed a significant jump in graphics. I love my PS5 and X, but the PS4 was such a graphically great system that the jump to next gen wasn’t that big.
@@XIIITheCoffeeMan yeah. The biggest jump was ps1 to ps2. The tail end of the PS3 had such fantastic looking games that early PS4 didn’t look so amazing. Late PS4 games still look incredible compared to early current gen games.
Totally agree, it was really cool back then because the systems were all custom made, today they're all just pc parts off the shelf which is great for parity buts it's so boring lol
@hyuga4477 I actually bought it on launch day 9/9/99 with Soul Calibur, much to the chagrin of my gf at the time because money was a little tight. I was extremely satisfied with that game in particular though, and I still have the DC and all the games in my possession to this day.
It isn't that people weren't ready for it. Sega abandoned the Saturn before its time. Saturn still had life in it, and they didn't give it a full chance to really compete with the PS1 and N64. The DC was released way too early. Then again, Sega released the Saturn too early too, in a dumb attempt to "get the jump" on Playstation, when they didn't need to. The Genesis was still doing well enough, even with the mess of the 32X attachment. Honestly, both Saturn and DC had bad marketing, and Sega in general just horribly mismanaged both consoles. Which is a damn shame.
@@Retrorevelations I disagree... The Saturn FLOPPED hard outside of Japan and Sega had internal global Problems which harmed the Saturn business... So they went WAY ahead of the Competition with the Dreamcast in 1998... A costly last attemped to get a foothold in the Gaming Industry again but the PS2 Hype "killed" it
Siempre he pensado que muchos juegos multiplataforma de Dreamcast eran "port flojos" de N64 o PSX pero aquí se ve claramente que muchos de dichos ports mejoraban texturas, geometría, distancia de dibujado, resolución y framerate, a veces todo al mismo tiempo. Este video coloca las cosas en perspectiva. Muchas gracias por este trabajo!
No por mucho. Siento que los desarrolladores que porteaban estos juegos desde la N64 o Ps1 solo se conformaban con incrementar la resolución de renderizado y algunas texturas y ya. Ciertamente no creo que la mayoría de las personas que compraban la Dreamcast lo hicieran para poder jugar los mismos juegos de N64 y Ps1 pero más bonitos.
@@IgnacioCalvo87 o sea no exprimieron la Dreamcast pero las versiones de N64 parecen juegos incompletos en esta comparación. El salto es generacional. Digamos que TAN flojos al final no eran
Depende de cada caso. Pero las mejoras de resolución, framerate y texturas eran muy fáciles de implementar y eran una gran mejora. Además de que los juegos buenos de n64 no tenían unos gráficos tan malos. Tal vez la gran mayoría no exprimieran la dreamcast, pero eran y son la mejor opción para jugar a algunos juegos buenos
Os 2 consoles são maravilhosos!! Ainda vou querer ter um N64, o Dreamcast já tenho!! E adoro ele!! Nessa época ele era imbatível!!! Grande comparativo!!
@@Goku16053 E hoje com a existência dos flashcard tudo se tornou mais fácil. Comprei aquele flashcard vermelho super 64 para um n64 que tenho desde 1997... É bom demais! Agora podemos ter todos os jogos em um só cartucho e sem precisar pagar um fortuna! Assim que pegar um n64 pegue um flashcard destes, o custo benefício é enorme.
12:26 Yikes, that framerate on NFL Quarterback Club 2000 is a harsh reminder of what so many games felt like on N64 back then. It was a dream when a 64 gave had a locked 30fps, and almost unheard of to see 60fps.
Vale lembrar que o Dreamcast m0rreu cedo..Imagine a qualidade ainda maior que os jogos teriam nos próximos anos com o hardware sendo melhor explorado..
Interesting that the Tony Hawk games on N64 were relatively small cartridge sizes compared to the quite common 256Mb carts around that time. Larger carts could have improved the soundtrack.
I can put up with the lower resolution, blurry textures, drab colours and heavy dithering all over the screen but I forget just how low the frame rate was in so many N64 games - so many examples here of titles struggling to get higher than 20fps.
Some N64 games play smoother without the expansion pack. Like Rush 2049. The pack enhanced graphics but at a loss to framerate which today is totally wack.
@@Lightblue2222I was going to say the same thing. Unfortunately the example you gave (Rush 2049) is completely wrong. That game used the expansion pack not to increase the resolution, but to allow for more movement and animations in the environment as well as make the huge 6th track playable.
Some of those N64 games that look extra choppy are actually better looking when played at their lower resolution. Some games I prefer playing in Hi-res mode but others are awful.
I can't think of many N64 games that didn't struggle in hi-res mode. Shadow Man, Star Wars Rogue Squadron, Excitebike 64, and that's about it. Everything else on N64 just dies in hi-res mode.
@davidaitken8503 I think mine ran smoother than the example shown here, looks pretty bad.. I loved this game and I didn't have the expansion pack. Perhaps the extra moving background environments messed with it. I've heard others say that Rush 2049 plays smoother without the pack. I know it was many years ago but I always thought it was smooth, just as smooth as Rush 2. But it was a while ago and I didn't have the Pak to compare. Spent many hours with friends especially on the stunt courses. And we were on CRT too if that made any difference.
I remember looking at ads in GamePro magazine for the Olympic Games game on Dreamcast and being BLOWN AWAY by how amazing they looked. They have not held up lol😅
Bacana a comparação,, Porem o Dreamcast era outra geração,, Era muito a frente do N64,, Dreamcast ja era praticamente da geração PS2 , Game Cube,, Foi um divisor de aguas , Que infelizmente nao se viu todo o potencial dele pois foi descontinuado,, Mais era uma máquina muito s frente do N64
When i got my dreamcast and booted up Soul Caliber for the first time i felt like i had an Arcade in my house..i was 13 so yeah silly but man what a time to lived in.Also noticed a lot of games got that magical 60fps treatment on DC makes an massive difference.
Dreamcast é um monstro... E pensar que saiu apenas dois anos após o n64. O meu eu tenho desde o ano 2000. Único problema era o leitor muito problemático... Enquanto tive que dar manutenção no GD ROM inúmeras vezes e hoje está parado novamente por causa do GD ROM,meu n64 que tenho desde 1997 nunca deu defeito e é quase indestrutível... Ao menos existe GD emu pra substituir o leitor do Dreamcast por leitor de cartão sd hoje em dia, aí sana de vez o problema.
Yeah sure, running at 10fps and 240p vs much higher quality assets at 60fps and 480p. The only things the N64 couldn't hold up were the framerate and a third party library of games.
@@litjellyfish The framerate is almost unplayable in most of these, that's holding up? Even the games shown here that had PS1 ports ran better on PS1. There's like 5 games that ran at 60 fps on the N64 and less than 50 that ran at stable framerates, most games couldn't even hit 20 fps regularly. The N64 not only doesn't hold up but it's probably the console with any sort of popularity that has aged the worst since the Atari 2600.
Man, the N64 could hold its own! The biggest thing that really stood out to me was how much the N64 struggled with its framerate. Games never ran smooth!
While it was obvious the next-gen Dreamcast was superior to the N64, there still was some 3rd party titles that the inferior N64 proved held its own to feel near identical! Bagai-O Hydro Thunder (Not graphics or sound, but only version that offered 4-players) Jikkyou Powerful Pro Yakyuu Pro Mahjong Kiwame Puyo Puyo ~n Mortal Kombat 4 / Gold Ms. Pac-Man Maze Madness Rayman 2 Resident Evil 2 (THE technical masterpiecew of all N64 titles. Somehow against all odds they made RE 2 work on an N64 cartridge and look identical) Roadster South Park Chef's Luv Shack eWetrix Worms Armageddon WWF Attitude
Belíssimo vídeo! Imagino o trabalho prá fazer essa compilação! Poderis ter um video também, comparando os jogos que sairam para o PlayStarion 1 e Dreamcast. Fechando esse triangulo! Hehe
O N64 até que foi bem é lógico que não se compara ao Dreamcast mas pelas limitações do console eu achei que se saiu muito bem que pena que o Game cube não seguiu o mesmo caminho do N64.
Isn't it weird?How all the games on the dreamcast ran at 60 frames per second?But now we have super powerful PC like consoles.And they're coming up with nothing but thirty frames per second games
Os jogos que ficaram mais parecidos,.são os jogos que saíram primeiro para o Nintendo 64, e depois portaram para o DREAMCAST. Mas os jogos que foram feitos para os amigos . Aí o N64 leva um sacode.
Duas palataformas que conheço muito pouco. Gostei mais de ver, além das questões gráficas, alguns jogos que tiveram a perspactiva ou o estilo de jogo alterado, isso pra mim foi o mais interessante.
It's safe to say that if you wanted the best version at home of an arcade game then the best system was Dreamcast. Even into the PS2 life span, if it was an arcade game, the best version was usually on Dreamcast. Unfortunately for Sega, they were pushing "arcade at home" while PS2 was pushing big budget, high quality single player experiences. Sega wanted to port arcade style games. It was pretty foolish of Sega given how arcades had already been dying by 1998. They finally figured it out and tried to put out some games like Shenmue, publishing Headhunter, and a few others, but it was a little too late. Even the big single player games they did get felt a little shallow compared to what PS and PS2 were doing. Also a total lack of RPGs and rampant piracy didn't help.
Dreamcast games originally made for it that were ported later on to the PS2 were often worse, in graphics or gameplay. Such is the case for Test Drive LeMans which had serious frame drops compared to its original Dreamcast release, also most of those ports ran at a worse resolution due to the most developers not utilizing the 480P mode of the PS2.
Como console da Sexta Geração, o Dreamcast é um bom exemplo, da diferença de Poder entre a Quinta Geração, que era composta por Nintendo 64, Plastation 1 e Sega Saturn, e de como novos consoles da Geração Seguinte, em relação aos jogos Crossgens, devem focar nos primeiros jogos em uma transição suave, focada no "APRIMORAMENTO MÁXIMO GRÁFICO DOS JOGOS DA QUINTA GERAÇÃO", aperfeiçoando FPS, TEXTURAS, POLIGONOS E RESOLUÇÃO, tudo num mesmo motor Gráfico da Quinta Geração, sem recorrer aos Novos Motores da Sexta Geração, suportando tudo, puramente só no Próprio Hardware, o Dreamcast como console da Sexta Geração, fez isso com maestria, usando as mesmas Engines dos consoles da Quinta Geração, e quando começou Realmente a usar seu poder em 2001, foi Suspeitosamente descontinuado, pra não atrapalhar uma certa empresa monopolizadora...por isso vemos hoje a mesma Sina se repetindo com Plastation 5 e Xbox Série X, que são consoles da Nona Geração, porem que tem se mantido ao longo desses 3 anos de mercado sem apresentar tanta diferença gráfica, em relação a Oitava Geração, alegando que estão focado no aprimoramento dos jogos, algo que no passado, tanto a Sony quanto a Microsoft, zombaram da Sega, dizendo que o Dreamcast só rodava jogos crossgens, e que seus "novos consoles" eram o "futuro" dos novos gráficos, algo que hoje hipocritamente fazem diferente, se colocando como "vitimas" dos devs que fazem jogos com tecnologia da Oitava Geração, e quando os jogos são lançados por eles mesmo como exclusivos, alegam questões de "estética" do jogo pra rodar 30 FPS, pura Hipocrisia, e hoje estão bebendo do mesmo veneno que deram no passado... Ótimo Vídeo! Poderia fazer mais comparações diretas como essa, entre os consoles e jogos em comum entre eles, assim como você fez nesse vídeo, Parabéns!
Even if N64 managed to run all those games fairly well for the time, it had nothing to do against the dreamcast, that had better textures, framerates, resolution and sound in comparison.
F1 World Grand Prix 1 and 2 are almost completely different games on the Dreamcast, and both feature a soundtrack composed by Jim Croft (now known as the Head of Sound at Frontier Developments).
Only a 2 year difference between these 2 consoles and the Dreamcast is so much better. Sega really went all in with their final console. I miss Sega hardware
@@litjellyfish These are all PS1/N64 ports, little one. Soul Calibur blew away anything previous generation. Anyways, I wish fanboys could make up their minds whether power matters. It doesn't when comparing NES to Master System or PS2 to XBox, but totally does with Dreamast? In reality, the Wii was pathetic compared to 360 and PS3, but destroyed them. Sega's fall had more to do with piracy and screwing over their customers after they invested in Sega hardware.
@@juststatedtheobvious9633 yup kiddo I actually said the same in another comment. Still it was a power jump that needed to be bigger. Then ended up as with saturn vs ps1 a console they was weaker than the SONY counterpart. Wii did not destroy but yeah it had other stuff the other did not. And a different product strategy. So it did not really compete with PS2 / Xbox. Which DC did. Piracy was not good but main issue was that it lacked title support and did not has as attractive titles as PS2
@@litjellyfish ps2 was a generation behind Xbox in graphics and it even lost to Dreamcast in 99% of the games they shared and ps2 still won with them ugly azz textures throughout the entire generation being the weakest and won let not even bring up how weak the wii was and it still won
@@southsidetherealest2860 yeah still the GameCube and Xbox came after the PS2 so naturally they should be more powerful. Same as the PS2 was more powerful than the DC. PS2 “won” basically due to getting the biggest marketshare, DC was diminished by it and discontinued. Lot of assisted sales due to the DVD. Microsoft was a new player. So the PS2 already had such a big library and support that it was basically impossible for any other than to try to grab as much they could of the PS2 cake Most of the shared DC / PS2 games was using same assets and PS2 had worse image quality so DC won by that.
Em vários casos é exatamente o mesmo jogo, porém aproveitando a resolução e frame rate maiores que o DC proporcionava. Como devia ser. Obviamente que nos next gen e exclusivos o DC deslanchava, a diferença de geração ficava gritante.
O roadsters por exemplo é até bonito no n64, mas o frame rate é bem ruim... Já no Dreamcast é como fosse a versão definitiva e roda extremamente bem apesar de ser um port. Agora realmente se tu pega um Shenmue por exemplo aí sim o salto gráfico é gigante.
@@TheFred128o Dead or Alive 2 também é tão detalhado a modelagens dos personagens, texturas e cenários rodando tudo à 60fps que mostram que o Dreamcast era mesmo de outra geração pois esse jogo que eu mencionei seria impossível de se rodar no Nintendo 64 ou Ps1!
@@Leo-xh8pp Com certeza, os gráficos do Dead or Alive 2 eram muito impressionantes, e são bonitos até hoje. E como eu falei do Roadsters que é de corrida, se pegar um Test drive Lemans, Tokyo Xtreme racer 2, Metrópolis street Race, f355 Challenge o salto gráfico também é gigante em relação aos games de n64 e ps1.
This really shows that the Dreamcast started the 6th gen of the console wars before the PS2 ever did. Starwars Episode 1 Racer looks a little like its Arcade Counterpart on the Dreamcast Tony Hawks Pro Skater 1 and 2 are more high quality than its PS1 and N64 Ports. Really sad that Pro Skater 3 would've been more on par with the PS2, Gamecube, and Xbox versions for the Dreamcast if it kept on going then it'll beat out the N64 in a heartbeat.
As expected most if not all of them look and run better in the newer Dreamcast hardware, the exception may be Bangai-o, i don´t know why but it looks higher res on N64.
It definitely isn't higher res on N64 but the N64 version is better. It always felt like you could see further around you and some really stupid changes made for the Dreamcast version were not for the better. The Dreamcast controller isn't nearly as good for the game either. I had actually played quite a lot of the Dreamcast version and decided to import the N64 version along with Sin & Punishment along with a Japanese to USA converter. I was actually pleasantly surprised at how much better the N64 version was.
Otimo vídeo, parabéns!! Deixa bem claro que o DC era apenas um console de quinta geração melhorado. Jogos 3D simples, porém com boas texturas, filtro antiserrilhado, imagem nítida graças a resolução, um baita console pra sua época, cumpriu bem o papel, melhor hardware da quinta geração e com folga. Vale lembrar que os joguinhos de arcade o Dreamcast roda com perfeição haha
Maior mentira essa. Essa "nitidez" do Dreamcast só é notada jogando num monitor com saída VGA e Cabo VGA, e 99% dos que jogaram Dreamcast, foi numa tv crt com o cabo av: o famoso vermelho, branco e amarelo. Por isso em questão de nitidez não tinha tanta diferença na TV CRT.
NBA Show Time, NFL Blitz, Ready 2 Rumble, Rayman, Roaders, F1 racing games looked good on the N64. Hampered by low resolutions an or low FPS, but looked good on the platform.
Dreamcast was such an underrated console, 2 years apart and worlds apart, Dreamcast really was the end of an era. Both systems were revolutionary, n64 made 3d gaming interesting and fun, while Dreamcast applied all the techniques still used today, better textures, higher resolution, 60 fps, and online gaming. Both blew me away. PS2 on the other hand was way overrated, riding on the success of its predecessor, the graphics seemed like a step down from the bright and colorful Dreamcast, and honestly, the games weren't as fun, not to say there weren't any great games, but it had too much shovelware. I believe with the death of the Dreamcast, the PS2 and Xbox were the beginning of a new era, the modern era of gaming.
So basically Dreamcast graphics is what N64 supposed to be if Nintendo didn't cut back the specs of it back when it was released and also aimed using CD instead of cartridge.
I think that is the Ps2. Both machines (N64 and Ps2) use MIPS processors, both machines use RAMBUS RDRAM, and both machines had a kind of vector processing unit that ran custom microcode.
Seeing how the N64 holds up compared to DC really makes you wonder how things would have been different had Nintendo kept the same hardware but used CDs instead of carts.
Mira que soy fan de Nintendo64, pero compararla con Dreamcast no es un buen negocio para la consola de Nintendo. En aquella época yo tenía N64, recuerdo que un amigo de la adolescencia alquiló una Dreamcast japonesa, antes de ser lanzada en Europa, era como ir al futuro nada más probarla. Recuerdo los juegos que alquiló, Sonic adventure y Power Stone, simplemente alucinantes en 1999. Saludos desde España
I mean clearly Dreamcast has generally better framerates, nicer graphics etc... but honestly, the N64 holds up a lot better than it ought to in some of these. And in fact has the edge in content in some cases (Resi 2, Hydrothunder). It's not exactly a video breaker but just FYI, WGP2 on N64 is actually the same game (content/season) as F1 WGP1 on Dreamcast. While N64 had 1997 and 1998 season games, the Dreamcast ones are actually 1998 and 1999 seasons.
Great video. Doesn't look like the were just scraped from the internet. Real hardware also. neat. The frame rate is sickening to look at on the n64 after seeing it on DC most games. LOL
Some of these game like Bangi-O and Gauntlet were actually better on N64 because of bad changes or missing features in the Dreamcast vetsion. Why those changes were made is absolutely baffling.
The Dreamcast port of Toy Story 2 was also shit. It's frustrating because not only is the Dreamcast a SIGNIFICANTLY more powerful console, but the developers had an entire 7 months to port the game to Dreamcast and they even DELAYED it, and they still fucked it up. Granted, the Dreamcast version does have some cool lighting effects, mapped reflections, higher quality movie clips, and an improved draw distance, but everything else about the Dreamcast version is lazy at best and straight up broken at worst. The analog controls do NOT work properly, there are graphical and sound bugs everywhere, the load times and framerate are abysmal (despite having the same models), and the textures are exactly the same. Perhaps the worst part about the Dreamcast version though (besides the controls) is the save system. The PS1, N64, and PC versions allow you to just overwrite the old save, just like every other game with a save system since the original Zelda on the NES. The Dreamcast version, however, does not allow you to do that. After each level you have to make an entirely NEW save file, then go back to the main menu and manually delete the old save file. If you don't delete the old save files your VMU will get full. It's confusing as hell, especially for this game's target audience which is KIDS!
@@legoclayfacehonestly, I would have been happier with a straight port of the Nintendo 64 version, with better textures and PS1 audio. The frame rate is absolutely horrendous with no optimization, at least this way it would have been a solid 30 with no work
Na minha opinião o Nintendo 64 e um vídeo game bem competente Porém o uso de cartuchos ao invés de CD ou DVD foi uma péssima escolha pois os jogos tinham auto Custo na época a galera só alugava os jogos moro na zona leste de são Paulo região de Itaquera na época de 1996 o Nintendo 64 era chamado de vídeo game de Boy pelo preço dos jogos ia numa loja no shopping Aricanduva pra vê quanto custa vá Um cartucho de N64 aí só alugando mesmo mas é um vídeo game que Eu não tive muito contato e também eu não gostei muito do n64 preferência era PlayStation1 SEGA Saturn Dreamcast PlayStation 2 E depois do velho e bom SNES na minha opinião a Nintendo nunca mais foi a mesma e quando a guerra chego no ps3, e Xbox 360 a Nintendo fico bem apática daí para frente com consoles muito Inferior aós concorrentes.
And let's be CLEAR (unlike n64 visuals...)... I love the console, purchased it DAY 1 IN 1996, and respect the (small) catalogue of great games, but... When I bought it, I purchased an S-Video cable immediately, to play on a top-of-the line Sony television, and it is still an eyesore compared to the SNES via default Composite cable. Today, I have an RGB modded N64 with a component cable, on a JVC D-SERIES CRT (700 lines on 27") just to make this console palatable to my eyes. PS1, Saturn, Dreamcast... all look FAR BETTER with only S-video. It's just the way the games are made... If you can accept the BLUR, you can enjoy the N-SIXTY-FURR. 🦁
... also, Dreamcast Composite cable absolutely sucks compared to S-Video; if you've never upgraded, you truly are missing out on WHY the console has a reputation for gorgeous visuals.
Coloca o vídeo em 1080p,é gigantesca a diferença, no Dreamcast não tem quebra de poligonos,resolução maior,frames,filtros e etc,é outra geração,meio injusto até comparar!
Well I mean they were going on the hype of the mini-scooter craze/fad of 2000/2001. I mean razor sold 5 million of their first foldable scooter in the first six months after it's launch. Also after the success of the original Tony Hawk's Skateboarding, "Extreme Sports" games were in. Matt Hoffman/Dave Mirra BMX, Shaun Palmer's Pro Snowboarder, Kelly Slater's Pro Surfer, Cool Boarders series, Aggressive Inline, SSX, 1080, Jet Set Radio, Trickstyle, Airblade etc.
Its crazy to see what the N64 could really do with its architecture and game file size.
Most N64 games were just 8mb, 16mb some were bigger but when you see the storage on Sega Gd rom it makes it even more impressive.
Easy to say that now that they aren't $80 haha. And no game on this list is anywhere close to that small
"No game on this list is anywhere near that" lmao styopeed m0r0n, the 2nd game on the list Asteroids64 is actually 4MB, most N64 games are between 8-16MB, with only the top tier games being 32MB and a handful being 64MB, think before typing i know its hard sometimes...
@@alanf8622 I believe you're confusing MB with Mb.
@@jhkuno88 no need to be so rude
6 people managed to put 2 CD's on to a 64 MegaByte cart. It's the most insane port ever done on any console.
No one else would even try to do it.
The Dreamcast was basically a next-gen console released too early, it was giving us a hint on what Next-Gen Graphics was gonna look like when the 2000's hit!
The same is true of the N64 but all of its' competition was technologically inferior. The Dreamcast had to compete with systems superior to it after a brief moment of being the most technologically advanced system.
The Dreamcast was an exclusive experience to all the smart people who bought it, while the masses were waiting for the PS2.
Even though the Dreamcast existed only for about 2 years it got a compatable classic game collection to the PS2, Xbox and GC. To me it still has the best games of that generation.
If they waited more, they'd got nothing to compete against ps2, or perhaps ps2 just came out at exactly the best time it could. Dreamcast could have been updated with the Naomi2 hardware, but at the time it was possible, Dreamcast got essentially discontinued, something not odd, given Sega's history of bad decisions, today, a Dreamcast Pro would have been released without issues.
@@epicon6I love the Dreamcast too and in some cases it had much better image quality than the PS2 but you've got to admit that it never really had any games on the same level as GTA 3, god of war or metal gear solid 2.
@@santitabnavascues8673Dreamcast no necesitaba actualizarse, de hecho hay en ciertos aspectos técnicos donde Dreamcast es superior a PS2. El tiempo en el que salió no es ni mejor ni peor simplemente no funciono comercialmente (por muchos motivos, sobretodo errores pasados) pero cuenta que todos los que tuvieron Dreamcast día uno, se dio un salto tecnológico con una diferencia impresionante un año antes (año y medio para los japoneses). Soul Calibur, Sonic Adventure, Crazy Taxi, Shenmue estaban a años luz de Playstation y N64.
El ejemplo de que podría haber continuado a igualdad en la generación lo tienes en cuanto aprovecharon (sobretodo Xbox por el acuerdo con Sega) los demás sistemas tras su salida del mercado. Casi siempre el sistema más poderoso no fue el de más éxito, claro ejemplo con Switch actualmente.
The N64 had some serious design flaws, but those last years between 1999-2001 had some impressive games for the machine. Some of these look pretty similar which is insane knowing the difference in power!
The N64 lived through the dreamcast's life and one year of PS2! Some games like DK64, perfect dark, Banjo-tooie, Pkmn stadium 2, majora's mask, Mario party 3 or conker's bad fur day felt bigger in content than many of the titles the others offered at the time
Some of these games looks similar on both platform because during it's lifetime the Dreamcast was largely held back by these overflowing of enhanched ports which were very cheap to make by the developers. If you take original Dreamcast games which use the real power of the machine like Shenmue or Resident Evil Code Veronica or DOA 2 not even Majoras Mask is even remotely comparable to them
Design flaws that include the onboard Texture Memory that weighed in at 4KB in size at the time, meant early N64 games had to be shrunken down in size to reduce the size and quality of the textures so that they would fit inside the onboard Texture memory. Followed by the unified architecture that was plagued by high access latency, in other words, the delay in time before a data transfer could occur. The type of memory implementation was RDRAM, which offered high bandwidth at a lower cost, but it had horrible latency to boot that programmers ultimately ignored storing textures on RAM due to horrible latency (640 ns).
CONKER!
RE2 on N64 was the first game in the series I played and to this day, it's still the most impressive port of a game in my opinion. At one point I had both the N64 and DC versions , but the fact that they were able to develop it and put it onto a single cartridge is technological sorcery.
It's an absolutely INSANE port. They managed some absolute black magic with that game by getting both discs of roughly 750-ish MB of data compressed down to only 64 MB of space on the cartridge. Bro that's 512 Mb. They managed to fit the entire two discs, PLUS EXTRA CONTENT down to 8.5% of its size, and in the process they remastered the audio and added Dolby surround support, and it's the only version to have those. It has the best audio version, ON CARTRIDGE. It's nuts man. The graphics are even better in some ways, such as actually having perspective correct textures on 3D models and higher resolutions at times, and worse in others like the FMV sequences and far lower resolution pre rendered backgrounds. But it's impressive on every single level.
I miss the days when a new console showed a significant jump in graphics. I love my PS5 and X, but the PS4 was such a graphically great system that the jump to next gen wasn’t that big.
TBH when I saw the leap from late PS3 to PS4, I didn't notice the jump either.
@@XIIITheCoffeeMan yeah. The biggest jump was ps1 to ps2. The tail end of the PS3 had such fantastic looking games that early PS4 didn’t look so amazing. Late PS4 games still look incredible compared to early current gen games.
yeah no kidding! after reaching 2006 the leaps were gone! and i feel like graphics have barely improved since 2008
Totally agree, it was really cool back then because the systems were all custom made, today they're all just pc parts off the shelf which is great for parity buts it's so boring lol
try cyberpunk now
Wow this was an amazing video! I didn’t know that a lot of Nintendo 64 games were 12MB in size.
The Dreamcast was *THE FUTURE* but people were just NOT ready for that... Such a shame!
Salieron 2 años antes por eso no resultó
The advertising for it was horrible. Most people just didn't know it existed at the time.
@hyuga4477 I actually bought it on launch day 9/9/99 with Soul Calibur, much to the chagrin of my gf at the time because money was a little tight. I was extremely satisfied with that game in particular though, and I still have the DC and all the games in my possession to this day.
It isn't that people weren't ready for it. Sega abandoned the Saturn before its time. Saturn still had life in it, and they didn't give it a full chance to really compete with the PS1 and N64. The DC was released way too early. Then again, Sega released the Saturn too early too, in a dumb attempt to "get the jump" on Playstation, when they didn't need to. The Genesis was still doing well enough, even with the mess of the 32X attachment. Honestly, both Saturn and DC had bad marketing, and Sega in general just horribly mismanaged both consoles. Which is a damn shame.
@@Retrorevelations I disagree... The Saturn FLOPPED hard outside of Japan and Sega had internal global Problems which harmed the Saturn business... So they went WAY ahead of the Competition with the Dreamcast in 1998... A costly last attemped to get a foothold in the Gaming Industry again but the PS2 Hype "killed" it
Siempre he pensado que muchos juegos multiplataforma de Dreamcast eran "port flojos" de N64 o PSX pero aquí se ve claramente que muchos de dichos ports mejoraban texturas, geometría, distancia de dibujado, resolución y framerate, a veces todo al mismo tiempo. Este video coloca las cosas en perspectiva.
Muchas gracias por este trabajo!
No por mucho. Siento que los desarrolladores que porteaban estos juegos desde la N64 o Ps1 solo se conformaban con incrementar la resolución de renderizado y algunas texturas y ya. Ciertamente no creo que la mayoría de las personas que compraban la Dreamcast lo hicieran para poder jugar los mismos juegos de N64 y Ps1 pero más bonitos.
Shadow man es un buen ejemplo de eso mejor calidad de audio
texturas
fps
estaba al nivel de la version de pc
Bueno, siguen siendo ports flojos la verdad xD, ya que para tratarse de una Dreamcast saben a poco
@@IgnacioCalvo87 o sea no exprimieron la Dreamcast pero las versiones de N64 parecen juegos incompletos en esta comparación. El salto es generacional. Digamos que TAN flojos al final no eran
Depende de cada caso. Pero las mejoras de resolución, framerate y texturas eran muy fáciles de implementar y eran una gran mejora. Además de que los juegos buenos de n64 no tenían unos gráficos tan malos. Tal vez la gran mayoría no exprimieran la dreamcast, pero eran y son la mejor opción para jugar a algunos juegos buenos
Os 2 consoles são maravilhosos!! Ainda vou querer ter um N64, o Dreamcast já tenho!! E adoro ele!! Nessa época ele era imbatível!!! Grande comparativo!!
O Dreamcast foi imbatível por 1 ano no máximo, o PS2 matou não só o Dreamcast, como a SEGA.
Tem que ter paciência para comprar um N64, não adianta negociar com retrogamers exploradores.
@@renattopaes Vlw a dica meu amigo!! Eu tenho um amigo que compro meus games retro bem honesto!! Mas realmente tem que cuidar!!! Abraço!!
@@Goku16053 E hoje com a existência dos flashcard tudo se tornou mais fácil. Comprei aquele flashcard vermelho super 64 para um n64 que tenho desde 1997... É bom demais! Agora podemos ter todos os jogos em um só cartucho e sem precisar pagar um fortuna! Assim que pegar um n64 pegue um flashcard destes, o custo benefício é enorme.
12:26 Yikes, that framerate on NFL Quarterback Club 2000 is a harsh reminder of what so many games felt like on N64 back then. It was a dream when a 64 gave had a locked 30fps, and almost unheard of to see 60fps.
Vale lembrar que o Dreamcast m0rreu cedo..Imagine a qualidade ainda maior que os jogos teriam nos próximos anos com o hardware sendo melhor explorado..
Will you do PS1 vs Dreamcast side by side. I am really curious to see the same games released on there respected consoles side by side.
I too would like to see that if it hasn't happened already.
Great work on this! Lots of effort went into to this
Thanks a lot. Appreciate all the hard work. What a superb video 👍😍🙏
Interesting that the Tony Hawk games on N64 were relatively small cartridge sizes compared to the quite common 256Mb carts around that time. Larger carts could have improved the soundtrack.
I can put up with the lower resolution, blurry textures, drab colours and heavy dithering all over the screen but I forget just how low the frame rate was in so many N64 games - so many examples here of titles struggling to get higher than 20fps.
Some N64 games play smoother without the expansion pack. Like Rush 2049. The pack enhanced graphics but at a loss to framerate which today is totally wack.
@@Lightblue2222I was going to say the same thing. Unfortunately the example you gave (Rush 2049) is completely wrong. That game used the expansion pack not to increase the resolution, but to allow for more movement and animations in the environment as well as make the huge 6th track playable.
Some of those N64 games that look extra choppy are actually better looking when played at their lower resolution. Some games I prefer playing in Hi-res mode but others are awful.
I can't think of many N64 games that didn't struggle in hi-res mode. Shadow Man, Star Wars Rogue Squadron, Excitebike 64, and that's about it. Everything else on N64 just dies in hi-res mode.
@davidaitken8503 I think mine ran smoother than the example shown here, looks pretty bad.. I loved this game and I didn't have the expansion pack. Perhaps the extra moving background environments messed with it. I've heard others say that Rush 2049 plays smoother without the pack. I know it was many years ago but I always thought it was smooth, just as smooth as Rush 2. But it was a while ago and I didn't have the Pak to compare.
Spent many hours with friends especially on the stunt courses. And we were on CRT too if that made any difference.
I remember seeing them side by side at a store when I went to buy my Dreamcast and I’ve never felt more sure about a purchase than that moment lol
R/that happened
I remember looking at ads in GamePro magazine for the Olympic Games game on Dreamcast and being BLOWN AWAY by how amazing they looked. They have not held up lol😅
excelente compilado! parabéns mesmo! seria legal fazer com outras plataformas!! adorei!
I always imagined these comparisons in those years, but we only had magazines that sometimes did comparisons! Thanks for uploading this content!
I can't help but appreciate both these pieces of hardware.
Bacana a comparação,, Porem o Dreamcast era outra geração,, Era muito a frente do N64,, Dreamcast ja era praticamente da geração PS2 , Game Cube,, Foi um divisor de aguas , Que infelizmente nao se viu todo o potencial dele pois foi descontinuado,, Mais era uma máquina muito s frente do N64
When i got my dreamcast and booted up Soul Caliber for the first time i felt like i had an Arcade in my house..i was 13 so yeah silly but man what a time to lived in.Also noticed a lot of games got that magical 60fps treatment on DC makes an massive difference.
brilliant video, thanks for this!
Dreamcast é um monstro... E pensar que saiu apenas dois anos após o n64. O meu eu tenho desde o ano 2000. Único problema era o leitor muito problemático... Enquanto tive que dar manutenção no GD ROM inúmeras vezes e hoje está parado novamente por causa do GD ROM,meu n64 que tenho desde 1997 nunca deu defeito e é quase indestrutível... Ao menos existe GD emu pra substituir o leitor do Dreamcast por leitor de cartão sd hoje em dia, aí sana de vez o problema.
Tenho um Dreamcast com GDemu e posso garantir que vale cada centavo.
@@EdnXavier Eu quero colocar no meu Dreamcast também. Dessa vez não vou arrumar o GD ROM, parece que dessa vez foi o motor que gira o disco.
Eu sou apaixonado pelo nintendo 64, pra sua geração ele foi sensacional! ❤
Me too
Pretty impressed at how well the N64 holds up here
It doesn’t
Yeah sure, running at 10fps and 240p vs much higher quality assets at 60fps and 480p. The only things the N64 couldn't hold up were the framerate and a third party library of games.
Well thing is that all games here are basically ports from N64 / early 3D PC so of course the N64 holds up.
@@RegularGillian Not all Dreamcast games showed here run at 60fps. Most are caped at 30 or are unstable uncaped 60.
@@litjellyfish The framerate is almost unplayable in most of these, that's holding up? Even the games shown here that had PS1 ports ran better on PS1. There's like 5 games that ran at 60 fps on the N64 and less than 50 that ran at stable framerates, most games couldn't even hit 20 fps regularly. The N64 not only doesn't hold up but it's probably the console with any sort of popularity that has aged the worst since the Atari 2600.
Both have games from Treasure on them, so I like the two of them.
This makes me wish every 3D game on the N64 (and PS1) was also on the Dreamcast. It look so much better.
Man, the N64 could hold its own! The biggest thing that really stood out to me was how much the N64 struggled with its framerate. Games never ran smooth!
Besides a few games I never really got too into the Dreamcast, but man it is an impressive console. It still looks stunning now.
Impressionante como o desempenho do Nintendo 64 é ruim nos jogos... Parecem todos rodarem abaixo dos 20 fps
Um processador dedicado ao áudio fez falta
E onde caberia um áudio de qualidade? Kkkkk
E dos frames, jogando em casa numa tubão sem ter nada para comparar, a gente adapta a visão.
Recentemente saiu um mod para super Mario 64 e Diddy Kong que faz fica em 60 FPS no Nintendo 64 via everdrive.
Awesome video, thanks.
This was a cool comparison video
While it was obvious the next-gen Dreamcast was superior to the N64, there still was some 3rd party titles that the inferior N64 proved held its own to feel near identical!
Bagai-O
Hydro Thunder (Not graphics or sound, but only version that offered 4-players)
Jikkyou Powerful Pro Yakyuu
Pro Mahjong Kiwame
Puyo Puyo ~n
Mortal Kombat 4 / Gold
Ms. Pac-Man Maze Madness
Rayman 2
Resident Evil 2 (THE technical masterpiecew of all N64 titles. Somehow against all odds they made RE 2 work on an N64 cartridge and look identical)
Roadster
South Park Chef's Luv Shack
eWetrix
Worms Armageddon
WWF Attitude
Belíssimo vídeo! Imagino o trabalho prá fazer essa compilação! Poderis ter um video também, comparando os jogos que sairam para o PlayStarion 1 e Dreamcast. Fechando esse triangulo! Hehe
O N64 até que foi bem é lógico que não se compara ao Dreamcast mas pelas limitações do console eu achei que se saiu muito bem que pena que o Game cube não seguiu o mesmo caminho do N64.
Para um vídeo game de 1996, o que o N64 entrega impressiona e muito!
Isn't it weird?How all the games on the dreamcast ran at 60 frames per second?But now we have super powerful PC like consoles.And they're coming up with nothing but thirty frames per second games
Ah yes, my two most favorite consoles. Home to Jet Set Radio and Mario 64. Still play these consoles regularly.
What a difference 60fps fluidity made!
It is a honor for the n64 to be compared with the wonderful Dreamcast, when the N64 should be normally compared with the Saturn.
Os jogos que ficaram mais parecidos,.são os jogos que saíram primeiro para o Nintendo 64, e depois portaram para o DREAMCAST.
Mas os jogos que foram feitos para os amigos .
Aí o N64 leva um sacode.
Duas palataformas que conheço muito pouco. Gostei mais de ver, além das questões gráficas, alguns jogos que tiveram a perspactiva ou o estilo de jogo alterado, isso pra mim foi o mais interessante.
It's safe to say that if you wanted the best version at home of an arcade game then the best system was Dreamcast. Even into the PS2 life span, if it was an arcade game, the best version was usually on Dreamcast. Unfortunately for Sega, they were pushing "arcade at home" while PS2 was pushing big budget, high quality single player experiences. Sega wanted to port arcade style games. It was pretty foolish of Sega given how arcades had already been dying by 1998. They finally figured it out and tried to put out some games like Shenmue, publishing Headhunter, and a few others, but it was a little too late. Even the big single player games they did get felt a little shallow compared to what PS and PS2 were doing. Also a total lack of RPGs and rampant piracy didn't help.
I love this type of videos, thank you !!!
Bangaoi Oh and Wetrix maybe better visually on N64? Some of the racing games close?
Obviously, frame rates are different but surprising there is no much different even generation difference.
Dreamcast usually wins but sometimes it's better than not only the N64 but the PS2 versions as well.
Dreamcast games originally made for it that were ported later on to the PS2 were often worse, in graphics or gameplay. Such is the case for Test Drive LeMans which had serious frame drops compared to its original Dreamcast release, also most of those ports ran at a worse resolution due to the most developers not utilizing the 480P mode of the PS2.
@@v1nag3rNBA 2K2 was also worse on the PS2 than Dreamcast.
And MDK2. You'd think that the console with the dual analogue stick would provide the better experience. You'd be wrong.
Como console da Sexta Geração, o Dreamcast é um bom exemplo, da diferença de Poder entre a Quinta Geração, que era composta por Nintendo 64, Plastation 1 e Sega Saturn, e de como novos consoles da Geração Seguinte, em relação aos jogos Crossgens, devem focar nos primeiros jogos em uma transição suave, focada no "APRIMORAMENTO MÁXIMO GRÁFICO DOS JOGOS DA QUINTA GERAÇÃO", aperfeiçoando FPS, TEXTURAS, POLIGONOS E RESOLUÇÃO, tudo num mesmo motor Gráfico da Quinta Geração, sem recorrer aos Novos Motores da Sexta Geração, suportando tudo, puramente só no Próprio Hardware, o Dreamcast como console da Sexta Geração, fez isso com maestria, usando as mesmas Engines dos consoles da Quinta Geração, e quando começou Realmente a usar seu poder em 2001, foi Suspeitosamente descontinuado, pra não atrapalhar uma certa empresa monopolizadora...por isso vemos hoje a mesma Sina se repetindo com Plastation 5 e Xbox Série X, que são consoles da Nona Geração, porem que tem se mantido ao longo desses 3 anos de mercado sem apresentar tanta diferença gráfica, em relação a Oitava Geração, alegando que estão focado no aprimoramento dos jogos, algo que no passado, tanto a Sony quanto a Microsoft, zombaram da Sega, dizendo que o Dreamcast só rodava jogos crossgens, e que seus "novos consoles" eram o "futuro" dos novos gráficos, algo que hoje hipocritamente fazem diferente, se colocando como "vitimas" dos devs que fazem jogos com tecnologia da Oitava Geração, e quando os jogos são lançados por eles mesmo como exclusivos, alegam questões de "estética" do jogo pra rodar 30 FPS, pura Hipocrisia, e hoje estão bebendo do mesmo veneno que deram no passado...
Ótimo Vídeo! Poderia fazer mais comparações diretas como essa, entre os consoles e jogos em comum entre eles, assim como você fez nesse vídeo, Parabéns!
I'll always be thankful to Dreamcast for giving me the pleasure of playing Phantasy Star Online, well, online, with players across the world. :D
Even if N64 managed to run all those games fairly well for the time, it had nothing to do against the dreamcast, that had better textures, framerates, resolution and sound in comparison.
I like my N64 Pikachu Edition and I have almost all games in PAL. 😊
Dreamcast should have been kept in the game a lot longer... don't let the flame die out!
F1 World Grand Prix 1 and 2 are almost completely different games on the Dreamcast, and both feature a soundtrack composed by Jim Croft (now known as the Head of Sound at Frontier Developments).
Only a 2 year difference between these 2 consoles and the Dreamcast is so much better. Sega really went all in with their final console. I miss Sega hardware
Yes and still it was a bit too weak to be a next generation (if you compare PS1 / N64 > DC.
compare it to PS2 thst was a real leap compared to PS1
@@litjellyfish
These are all PS1/N64 ports, little one.
Soul Calibur blew away anything previous generation. Anyways, I wish fanboys could make up their minds whether power matters. It doesn't when comparing NES to Master System or PS2 to XBox, but totally does with Dreamast?
In reality, the Wii was pathetic compared to 360 and PS3, but destroyed them.
Sega's fall had more to do with piracy and screwing over their customers after they invested in Sega hardware.
@@juststatedtheobvious9633 yup kiddo I actually said the same in another comment.
Still it was a power jump that needed to be bigger. Then ended up as with saturn vs ps1 a console they was weaker than the SONY counterpart.
Wii did not destroy but yeah it had other stuff the other did not. And a different product strategy. So it did not really compete with PS2 / Xbox. Which DC did.
Piracy was not good but main issue was that it lacked title support and did not has as attractive titles as PS2
@@litjellyfish ps2 was a generation behind Xbox in graphics and it even lost to Dreamcast in 99% of the games they shared and ps2 still won with them ugly azz textures throughout the entire generation being the weakest and won let not even bring up how weak the wii was and it still won
@@southsidetherealest2860 yeah still the GameCube and Xbox came after the PS2 so naturally they should be more powerful. Same as the PS2 was more powerful than the DC. PS2 “won” basically due to getting the biggest marketshare, DC was diminished by it and discontinued. Lot of assisted sales due to the DVD. Microsoft was a new player. So the PS2 already had such a big library and support that it was basically impossible for any other than to try to grab as much they could of the PS2 cake
Most of the shared DC / PS2 games was using same assets and PS2 had worse image quality so DC won by that.
Em vários casos é exatamente o mesmo jogo, porém aproveitando a resolução e frame rate maiores que o DC proporcionava. Como devia ser. Obviamente que nos next gen e exclusivos o DC deslanchava, a diferença de geração ficava gritante.
O roadsters por exemplo é até bonito no n64, mas o frame rate é bem ruim... Já no Dreamcast é como fosse a versão definitiva e roda extremamente bem apesar de ser um port. Agora realmente se tu pega um Shenmue por exemplo aí sim o salto gráfico é gigante.
@@TheFred128o Dead or Alive 2 também é tão detalhado a modelagens dos personagens, texturas e cenários rodando tudo à 60fps que mostram que o Dreamcast era mesmo de outra geração pois esse jogo que eu mencionei seria impossível de se rodar no Nintendo 64 ou Ps1!
@@Leo-xh8pp Com certeza, os gráficos do Dead or Alive 2 eram muito impressionantes, e são bonitos até hoje. E como eu falei do Roadsters que é de corrida, se pegar um Test drive Lemans, Tokyo Xtreme racer 2, Metrópolis street Race, f355 Challenge o salto gráfico também é gigante em relação aos games de n64 e ps1.
This really shows that the Dreamcast started the 6th gen of the console wars before the PS2 ever did.
Starwars Episode 1 Racer looks a little like its Arcade Counterpart on the Dreamcast
Tony Hawks Pro Skater 1 and 2 are more high quality than its PS1 and N64 Ports. Really sad that Pro Skater 3 would've been more on par with the PS2, Gamecube, and Xbox versions for the Dreamcast if it kept on going then it'll beat out the N64 in a heartbeat.
muito legal a comparação, apesar do 64 ser um console de 64 bits e o dream de 128 até que se parecem os games rs.
The Dreamcast wipes the floor with the N64 😊
As expected most if not all of them look and run better in the newer Dreamcast hardware, the exception may be Bangai-o, i don´t know why but it looks higher res on N64.
It definitely isn't higher res on N64 but the N64 version is better. It always felt like you could see further around you and some really stupid changes made for the Dreamcast version were not for the better. The Dreamcast controller isn't nearly as good for the game either. I had actually played quite a lot of the Dreamcast version and decided to import the N64 version along with Sin & Punishment along with a Japanese to USA converter. I was actually pleasantly surprised at how much better the N64 version was.
Otimo vídeo, parabéns!! Deixa bem claro que o DC era apenas um console de quinta geração melhorado. Jogos 3D simples, porém com boas texturas, filtro antiserrilhado, imagem nítida graças a resolução, um baita console pra sua época, cumpriu bem o papel, melhor hardware da quinta geração e com folga. Vale lembrar que os joguinhos de arcade o Dreamcast roda com perfeição haha
Maior mentira essa. Essa "nitidez" do Dreamcast só é notada jogando num monitor com saída VGA e Cabo VGA, e 99% dos que jogaram Dreamcast, foi numa tv crt com o cabo av: o famoso vermelho, branco e amarelo. Por isso em questão de nitidez não tinha tanta diferença na TV CRT.
@@Pedro_5859 🥱😮💨
Dreamcast was and still is a perfection but nintendo 64 still has it's own unique vibe that I love equally
DC was on the edge but if N64 had larger ROM capability, it would surely have closer results, I bet.
NBA Show Time, NFL Blitz, Ready 2 Rumble, Rayman, Roaders, F1 racing games looked good on the N64. Hampered by low resolutions an or low FPS, but looked good on the platform.
It's kinda weird they are a generation apart, yet only two years apart (Japanese release) much like Mega Drive and Super Famicom.
Excelent video!
the common point was better framerate in dreamcast, but some n64 games were so close in quality
Woah, Dream cast looked this good?
Edge of Reality developed the N64 version of Spider-Man (2000).
see i had both, and i played a lot of both, the dreamcast looks way better by leagues, but the n64 was about load times.
Dreamcast was such an underrated console, 2 years apart and worlds apart, Dreamcast really was the end of an era. Both systems were revolutionary, n64 made 3d gaming interesting and fun, while Dreamcast applied all the techniques still used today, better textures, higher resolution, 60 fps, and online gaming. Both blew me away. PS2 on the other hand was way overrated, riding on the success of its predecessor, the graphics seemed like a step down from the bright and colorful Dreamcast, and honestly, the games weren't as fun, not to say there weren't any great games, but it had too much shovelware. I believe with the death of the Dreamcast, the PS2 and Xbox were the beginning of a new era, the modern era of gaming.
The N64 was impressive but the Dreamcast remains superior.
Its really Impressive of how Nintendo 64 graphics were on par with Dreamcast graphics considering the consoles processing power
thank you 👍💖
0:39 Asteroids 💀💀💀
pew pew pew 😂
So basically Dreamcast graphics is what N64 supposed to be if Nintendo didn't cut back the specs of it back when it was released and also aimed using CD instead of cartridge.
I think that is the Ps2. Both machines (N64 and Ps2) use MIPS processors, both machines use RAMBUS RDRAM, and both machines had a kind of vector processing unit that ran custom microcode.
Seeing how the N64 holds up compared to DC really makes you wonder how things would have been different had Nintendo kept the same hardware but used CDs instead of carts.
Mira que soy fan de Nintendo64, pero compararla con Dreamcast no es un buen negocio para la consola de Nintendo. En aquella época yo tenía N64, recuerdo que un amigo de la adolescencia alquiló una Dreamcast japonesa, antes de ser lanzada en Europa, era como ir al futuro nada más probarla. Recuerdo los juegos que alquiló, Sonic adventure y Power Stone, simplemente alucinantes en 1999.
Saludos desde España
The N64 is a beast! Imagine if it had CDs. My fav console ever.
The N64DD:
@@dustytux Thats not CDs at all. It holds only 64MB, same as a regular cart.
Dreamcast STOMPS N64. And Sonic Adventure STOMPS Super Mario 64 in my opinion.
I mean clearly Dreamcast has generally better framerates, nicer graphics etc... but honestly, the N64 holds up a lot better than it ought to in some of these. And in fact has the edge in content in some cases (Resi 2, Hydrothunder).
It's not exactly a video breaker but just FYI, WGP2 on N64 is actually the same game (content/season) as F1 WGP1 on Dreamcast. While N64 had 1997 and 1998 season games, the Dreamcast ones are actually 1998 and 1999 seasons.
Great video. Doesn't look like the were just scraped from the internet. Real hardware also. neat. The frame rate is sickening to look at on the n64 after seeing it on DC most games. LOL
32MB cartridges vs 1.3GB GD-Roms. What a shame.
dreamcrast looks like it runs 40FPS while N64 looks like it runs at 20FPS
Some of these game like Bangi-O and Gauntlet were actually better on N64 because of bad changes or missing features in the Dreamcast vetsion. Why those changes were made is absolutely baffling.
The Dreamcast port of Toy Story 2 was also shit. It's frustrating because not only is the Dreamcast a SIGNIFICANTLY more powerful console, but the developers had an entire 7 months to port the game to Dreamcast and they even DELAYED it, and they still fucked it up. Granted, the Dreamcast version does have some cool lighting effects, mapped reflections, higher quality movie clips, and an improved draw distance, but everything else about the Dreamcast version is lazy at best and straight up broken at worst. The analog controls do NOT work properly, there are graphical and sound bugs everywhere, the load times and framerate are abysmal (despite having the same models), and the textures are exactly the same.
Perhaps the worst part about the Dreamcast version though (besides the controls) is the save system. The PS1, N64, and PC versions allow you to just overwrite the old save, just like every other game with a save system since the original Zelda on the NES. The Dreamcast version, however, does not allow you to do that. After each level you have to make an entirely NEW save file, then go back to the main menu and manually delete the old save file. If you don't delete the old save files your VMU will get full. It's confusing as hell, especially for this game's target audience which is KIDS!
@@legoclayfacehonestly, I would have been happier with a straight port of the Nintendo 64 version, with better textures and PS1 audio. The frame rate is absolutely horrendous with no optimization, at least this way it would have been a solid 30 with no work
64 was really amazing
Por que sega por que? ... tuviste que lanzar tantas consolas + perifericos a la vez 😢
Wasn't rush also come out for DC? Also I noticed DC missed soccer games (gifs and isss)
Many of them on psx too, 32, 64, and 128.
Na minha opinião o Nintendo 64
e um vídeo game bem competente
Porém o uso de cartuchos ao invés de CD ou DVD foi uma péssima escolha pois os jogos tinham auto
Custo na época a galera só alugava
os jogos moro na zona leste de são Paulo região de Itaquera na época
de 1996 o Nintendo 64 era chamado
de vídeo game de Boy pelo preço
dos jogos ia numa loja no shopping
Aricanduva pra vê quanto custa vá
Um cartucho de N64 aí só alugando
mesmo mas é um vídeo game que
Eu não tive muito contato e também
eu não gostei muito do n64 preferência era PlayStation1 SEGA Saturn Dreamcast PlayStation 2
E depois do velho e bom SNES na
minha opinião a Nintendo nunca mais foi a mesma e quando a guerra chego no ps3, e Xbox 360
a Nintendo fico bem apática daí para frente com consoles muito
Inferior aós concorrentes.
N-SIXTY-FURR!!!.... for the LOSS! lol 😂
And let's be CLEAR (unlike n64 visuals...)...
I love the console, purchased it DAY 1 IN 1996, and respect the (small) catalogue of great games, but... When I bought it, I purchased an S-Video cable immediately, to play on a top-of-the line Sony television, and it is still an eyesore compared to the SNES via default Composite cable.
Today, I have an RGB modded N64 with a component cable, on a JVC D-SERIES CRT (700 lines on 27") just to make this console palatable to my eyes.
PS1, Saturn, Dreamcast... all look FAR BETTER with only S-video. It's just the way the games are made...
If you can accept the BLUR, you can enjoy the N-SIXTY-FURR. 🦁
... also, Dreamcast Composite cable absolutely sucks compared to S-Video; if you've never upgraded, you truly are missing out on WHY the console has a reputation for gorgeous visuals.
Wakko jakko was in r2r?
Black cat looks more aestheticc on n64? wtheck
Praticamente o DC supera em todos na nitidez da imagem e som. Só nos games antigos emulado q fica empatado. Na minha opinião. 🤔
Jogos de 5th geração rodando em um console de 6th geração. Não tinha como ter outro resultado:)
Não há comparação, mesmo os jogos do N64 rodam lisinhos mas o lado gráfico e sonoro é outra geração acima... Daí veio o PS2 e enterrou tudo!
El N64 era una consola poderosa con 64bits comparada con los 32bits del PS1 pero luego llegó el Dreamcast con sus 128bits a romperles la madre a todos
But en ventas no
Otima comparação, N64 parabens🎉
A maior diferença nas comparações fica pelo framerate porque graficamente a diferença nao é tão grande. Nintendo 64 fez frente.
Coloca o vídeo em 1080p,é gigantesca a diferença, no Dreamcast não tem quebra de poligonos,resolução maior,frames,filtros e etc,é outra geração,meio injusto até comparar!
14:10 Never seen a game this sad 😂
Well I mean they were going on the hype of the mini-scooter craze/fad of 2000/2001. I mean razor sold 5 million of their first foldable scooter in the first six months after it's launch. Also after the success of the original Tony Hawk's Skateboarding, "Extreme Sports" games were in. Matt Hoffman/Dave Mirra BMX, Shaun Palmer's Pro Snowboarder, Kelly Slater's Pro Surfer, Cool Boarders series, Aggressive Inline, SSX, 1080, Jet Set Radio, Trickstyle, Airblade etc.
these all look like up-ports. made for the n64 and ported to the dreamcast.