I was originally against this idea but I like it now due to the fact that iran needs this water for desalination. One plan says they want to desalijnate water and fill it, which is silly. It will cost over 10 billion obviously to dig it, however, there are some rivers that can be widened and used. The fresh water can temporarily be held back to fill the canal. This river is also connected to another one which is dammed. A large river through iran would solve a lot of problems.
@@iranazadi7I think making big, modern cities would solve the problem for less money. The disastrous location of mega cities like Tehran and Qom is the problem not Iran's lack of water
How would water evaporate if it will fullfill caspian sea? Water from persian gulf would cause more rains and maybe even fullfill aral sea. Caspian sea is drying. Water evaporated in caspian sea might cause bigger rainfalls in central Asia and lower the level of the oceans. Central Asia needs this water source.
The video is very generic and has many errors. If the cost is 10 billions and china likes it, it will be made part of belt and road. Als evaporation could make more benefits than damages greening those areas. But the Caspian sea getting filled is not a problem
Evaporation would never be a problem as it would just let the sea water flow. To say that nowadays someone doesn't have the technical knowledge to drill a hole in a mountain is incredibly stupid, to say that Russia can't get 10 billion dollars is another colossal stupidity. The only thing that prevents this channel from existing is that Russia does not feel confident about the political variations that may exist over time. For example, Russia is torn between investing and not investing in new gas projects in Germany, but the economic group managed to make the investment, now that the Western government has kidnapped all investments. the conservative side killed everyone involved in business with europe. Russia doesn't build this, because Russia doesn't believe in contracts, something that was broken once will be broken again.
WTF are you even talking about, a river needs altitude to produce flow, a canal can not be built with water just sitting there (or otherwise it evaporates...) Actually every problem you mentioned in your analysis cancel out each other besides the one on Iran's ressources. As the crow flies, an iranian canal would be about 800 km in length. Let's take an example, the Danube river drops 50m in altitude within the last 800 km of its route. A 30 m difference for the canal would barely allow for a flow to compensate evaporation, without flooding the Caspian sea. Therefore even an earthquake would not cause a flooding since the natural slope would limit the flow. The only real problem is to be able to dig a continnuous slope through Iran, which means huge canal tunnels for freiht ships or massive canyons. Take a look at "The Line", multiply it by 1000. The lowest path would still go through 1000 m high mountain passes, which means digging a 1km deep canyon over tenths of kilometers ?!!
Well... it would need locks regardless due to the mountains... also due to mountains if the locks are destroyed the Caspian would not be flooded... but you're correct, it will never happen,it would be too big a project...$10 isn't even 1/20th the cost...
One mistake you made is that the point of a Russian trade route through Iran is to ensure shorter and cheaper route for Russia oil exports to India, not to venture out into the Atlantic because Russia’s Arctic vessels can already reach out into the open Atlantic.
First: calling Turkey an allie of the West is courageous. Turkey regards itself as the leader of the Sunni muslim world. For the Turks the supporters of Israel in the West are enemies. Second: Russia has access to the Sea in the far North. Third: Russia, Iran and India have united to build a corridor using rail transport where necessary. Forth: Russia's main partner is China. To connect they use rail and pipelines.
Man this is much better than the last video. Hope tge next video gets better.
Man I congratulate you for your work on this youtube channel. Your shorts seem to have worked for views
They don't need a canal, they already have a rail and road route which is much safer.
the canal would be much cheaper for shipping, while also being marketable
I was originally against this idea but I like it now due to the fact that iran needs this water for desalination. One plan says they want to desalijnate water and fill it, which is silly. It will cost over 10 billion obviously to dig it, however, there are some rivers that can be widened and used. The fresh water can temporarily be held back to fill the canal. This river is also connected to another one which is dammed. A large river through iran would solve a lot of problems.
@@iranazadi7I think making big, modern cities would solve the problem for less money. The disastrous location of mega cities like Tehran and Qom is the problem not Iran's lack of water
@@MahdiyarAbdollahi you have no idea what you'e talking about. There are two large lakes above tehran. Those cities dono't have a water problem.
How would water evaporate if it will fullfill caspian sea? Water from persian gulf would cause more rains and maybe even fullfill aral sea. Caspian sea is drying. Water evaporated in caspian sea might cause bigger rainfalls in central Asia and lower the level of the oceans. Central Asia needs this water source.
The video is very generic and has many errors. If the cost is 10 billions and china likes it, it will be made part of belt and road. Als evaporation could make more benefits than damages greening those areas. But the Caspian sea getting filled is not a problem
Único canal que trabalhou esse tema.
🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
These is already a canal between black and Caspian sea built by the ussr but its only small
Evaporation would never be a problem as it would just let the sea water flow. To say that nowadays someone doesn't have the technical knowledge to drill a hole in a mountain is incredibly stupid, to say that Russia can't get 10 billion dollars is another colossal stupidity. The only thing that prevents this channel from existing is that Russia does not feel confident about the political variations that may exist over time. For example, Russia is torn between investing and not investing in new gas projects in Germany, but the economic group managed to make the investment, now that the Western government has kidnapped all investments. the conservative side killed everyone involved in business with europe. Russia doesn't build this, because Russia doesn't believe in contracts, something that was broken once will be broken again.
Can have control flow of water into canal to take care of water loss through evaporation.
WTF are you even talking about, a river needs altitude to produce flow, a canal can not be built with water just sitting there (or otherwise it evaporates...)
Actually every problem you mentioned in your analysis cancel out each other besides the one on Iran's ressources. As the crow flies, an iranian canal would be about 800 km in length. Let's take an example, the Danube river drops 50m in altitude within the last 800 km of its route. A 30 m difference for the canal would barely allow for a flow to compensate evaporation, without flooding the Caspian sea. Therefore even an earthquake would not cause a flooding since the natural slope would limit the flow.
The only real problem is to be able to dig a continnuous slope through Iran, which means huge canal tunnels for freiht ships or massive canyons. Take a look at "The Line", multiply it by 1000.
The lowest path would still go through 1000 m high mountain passes, which means digging a 1km deep canyon over tenths of kilometers ?!!
Well... it would need locks regardless due to the mountains... also due to mountains if the locks are destroyed the Caspian would not be flooded... but you're correct, it will never happen,it would be too big a project...$10 isn't even 1/20th the cost...
They should build a modern rail line that will be a simple and inexpensive solution
One mistake you made is that the point of a Russian trade route through Iran is to ensure shorter and cheaper route for Russia oil exports to India, not to venture out into the Atlantic because Russia’s Arctic vessels can already reach out into the open Atlantic.
If both canals in the video were built
Then Kuzehkstan (did I spell it correctly) would benefit not going through the strait of Hormuz
👍👍👍
Russia is a marvel ❤❤❤
First: calling Turkey an allie of the West is courageous. Turkey regards itself as the leader of the Sunni muslim world. For the Turks the supporters of Israel in the West are enemies.
Second: Russia has access to the Sea in the far North.
Third: Russia, Iran and India have united to build a corridor using rail transport where necessary.
Forth: Russia's main partner is China. To connect they use rail and pipelines.
BRICS+ waytogo.... wtch this space!
Build trains and oleoducts
This will happen and alreay started long time ago!!!
What are you smoking?😂
How are they landlocked there right next to water
did you watch the video, they are trying to avoid western waters
Iranians are not stupid to let Russians on their land, whatever the excuse may be.
Russia has no money
at least they know what the mercy is but Muslims and islamic republic regime even do not know waht is that entirely