Wow, this is so clearly explained! Your diagrams make this concept so much clearer, and you make the content very engaging. I especially appreciate how you preempt a lot of the questions we might have and explain those sticking points really clearly. Thank you for putting the time into making this :)
First 10 minutes: Excellent, this is the best anyone has explained it. "These properties are like being pregnant" Like I just got punched in the gut in one sentence lmao
Working on my GED math and this video is one of the best explained about relations. I still have a long way to go but I’m definitely feeling better about this after watching this video 🙏
This is the best video about the reflexive, symmetric and transitive properties I ever see) Thank you so much. English isn't my native language, but your explanation I understand better then my teacher's explanation on native language.
Thank you so much! I went through so much video to finally find yours and understand the concept! My discrete mathematics exam is tomorrow and I’m sure I will do good!
helpful explanation! Thank you! would be helpful, if you could relate every video to a playlist. I searched for this one in the playlists, but couldn't find it. I usually watch a playlist or a bunch of videos on a topic, because this helps more.
hi! your explanation was perfect. but in the last example, what if we go from a to b then to d. will it still be transitive? cause we have relation from "a" to "d" only from the second set, but not from the 1st set "a"
A bit unclear or lacking on actual relations involved, say =, not =, < , etc...and how these RELATIIONs are connected to your arrows (which don’t make the relations explicit). How do you do a
For symmetric, and we have a single arrow pointing a--->b couldn't we just draw an arrowhead on the same relation so ab would be symmetric? or do double arrows not count
Reflexive: Not reflexive cause there's no (c,c). Symmetric: It is symmetric cause it has (a, b), (b, a) and (a, c), (c, a). Transitive: Not transitive cause there's (a, b) and (a, c) but not (b, c).
Is this relation R = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 2), (2, 1), (3, 3)} symmetric and transitive? Apparently it's symmetric because 1R2 2R1 however 1R3 but 3R!1 so I don't understand why it's symmetric.
why last one is transitive, c has no way to go, I though transitive should for all elements in domain, I think I miss some part, could anyone explain why?
Damn man, you really deserve the salary of my university teachers combined. well explained.
Your learning geometry in university? damn unlucky
@@er1cplayz this is discrete math...
@@er1cplayzthis relational properties are used a lot in transformation geometry and euclidian geometry though, so you're not entirely wrong
you explained in 16 minutes what my prof couldn't in hours thanks
Wow, this is so clearly explained! Your diagrams make this concept so much clearer, and you make the content very engaging. I especially appreciate how you preempt a lot of the questions we might have and explain those sticking points really clearly. Thank you for putting the time into making this :)
First 10 minutes: Excellent, this is the best anyone has explained it.
"These properties are like being pregnant"
Like I just got punched in the gut in one sentence lmao
Thank you so much. Only after watching your video, I am able to understand relations. I really woudn't have otherwise.
thanks, the best explanation that I saw here on RUclips
I've watched over 10 videos from different channels trying to understand these types of relation
But finally I've found the one😂🔥
May god bless you , you’re one of a kind.
Im struggling with this shit and u made it easier
have u tried laxatives?
thank you, I've been stuggle figuring out where the z came from forever
I slept during the discussion.you are a life saver
Watching this video is what helped me pass my first year uni discrete maths subject - thank you! :-)
Glad it helped, and congrats!
Omigosh same!
I am a French student in my last year of high school and I NEVER heard of that. Really interesting video, thank you very much!
I'm having an midterm exam this next week now I know transitive in less than 20 minutes
Working on my GED math and this video is one of the best explained about relations. I still have a long way to go but I’m definitely feeling better about this after watching this video 🙏
My lecture spent 1:45minute of waffling and our saviour here spent 15mins bruh u deserve my tuition
this was so good I even let the mid-video ad play.
Lifesaving video. Why can't tenured professors teach this well smh.
You teach this so different and it is exactly what I needed to understand. Thank you! I wish I had found this when I took precalculus
it's crystal clear!
thank you Pal, For bringing this video to world. ...
This is the best video about the reflexive, symmetric and transitive properties I ever see) Thank you so much. English isn't my native language, but your explanation I understand better then my teacher's explanation on native language.
Thank you so much! I went through so much video to finally find yours and understand the concept! My discrete mathematics exam is tomorrow and I’m sure I will do good!
nah bc i know this guy is the funny teacher everyone loves.
In love with the pfp
Thanks a lot. Great way of explaining and great presentation and display of it all.
one of the best explanations of all time.
Oh my even a zombie will get it
True
helpful explanation! Thank you! would be helpful, if you could relate every video to a playlist. I searched for this one in the playlists, but couldn't find it. I usually watch a playlist or a bunch of videos on a topic, because this helps more.
only after watching this video that I finally understood this thing.
Thank you greatly !
i'm taking Alg 2 now and i have a really stupid teacher who lowkey can't teach. thanks so much for this, it made so much sense
This was very well made
Thank you so much..ගොඩක් ස්තූතියි..I am from sri Lanka ♥️♥️ 🇱🇰🇱🇰
This is the best explantion on youtube!!! Thank you so much
I think you should get more criticism since that motivate you to publish this video. You are great at teaching!
explained very beautifully and very perfectly you deserve a subscribe love from INDIA.
yo this concept was hard af for me, this just opened my eyes, as for the pregnant bar!
so much better than try to learn from reading a textbook
I liked your explanation of transitivity! Super clear!
For the first time I understood this
your explanation really helped me a lot, thank youuuu so muchhh
you are incredible, thanks!
7:45 ecstazy
Amajing video really needed a lot...!!!
Damn good then our teachers...!!
You are a God. Thanks
رحم الله والديك 🌿✨
As clear as cristal! Thanks you.
The night before exam.
Thank you sir ,even a dumb student can get the concept from ya 👌🏽
wheres the anti- symmetric relation?
Glad I found this video
Best teacher
hi! your explanation was perfect. but in the last example, what if we go from a to b then to d. will it still be transitive? cause we have relation from "a" to "d" only from the second set, but not from the 1st set "a"
please we need exercices for that more than explination and thank you so much
how about equivalence ? sir
A bit unclear or lacking on actual relations involved, say =, not =, < , etc...and how these RELATIIONs are connected to your arrows (which don’t make the relations explicit). How do you do a
For symmetric, and we have a single arrow pointing a--->b couldn't we just draw an arrowhead on the same relation so ab would be symmetric? or do double arrows not count
{(a, a), (a, b), (a, c), (b, b), (b, a), (c, a), (d, d) is symmetric, transitive or reflexive? it really confused me alot
Not reflexive and transitive but is symmetric
It is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive
Reflexive: Not reflexive cause there's no (c,c).
Symmetric: It is symmetric cause it has (a, b), (b, a) and (a, c), (c, a).
Transitive: Not transitive cause there's (a, b) and (a, c) but not (b, c).
So clear 👍🏻
this video helped me a lot , thank you so much
11:46 "you can't be half pregnant..."
Me: 🤔🤔 uhh
Big salute !!!
THANK YOU FOR THIS
You explained very well . My Maths professor Damo is waste ,
you are amazing, thank you so much for this
Thank you sir you helped me.
You a cool teacher
This guy gives me Technoblade vibes
Nice explaining 👍🏻
amazing stuff, thank you so much
"u cant be half pregnant" ur damn right HAHAHAHA
Well explained. thank you soo much
Thx man ☺️
Thank you very much for help
Thank you so much
That's amazing 👍
Thank you so much !
Wow, thanks man
Thank you very much
Thank you ❤
i have an iq of -150 and i got this entire video lol
Thank you!
Soooo clear. Thx
Thank You Sir
Is this relation R = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 2), (2, 1), (3, 3)} symmetric and transitive? Apparently it's symmetric because 1R2 2R1 however 1R3 but 3R!1 so I don't understand why it's symmetric.
It's not symmetric. Probably a typo in the answer you are referring.
but there's c to d and d to c also c to c...it doesnt count as transitive? so it needs all the possibility to be true or just one?
Amazing zing zing
why last one is transitive, c has no way to go, I though transitive should for all elements in domain, I think I miss some part, could anyone explain why?
Every element that connects
I finally got this 😭
Thank you so muchhh
THANK YOUU!!
what if (a-> a), (b->b) and (c->c). Is it transitive?
yup. the easiest way to think of it is, "it's transitive because you can't show that it's not."
Thank you
best video
Ur voice's like u host tv shows.
Thanks 👍🏻
NOw if only my professor (who clearly listens to NPR and eats salt free saltines) could explain shit like this I'd be doing much better in my class.
superbro tq very mcuh
what about anti-semetric, irreflexive and Asymmetric?
{{1,1} , {2,2} , {3,3} , {4,4} } how it can be Symmetric Transitive and Reflexive
It’s reflexive
@@muemelog5863 ايش تسوي هنا😂
Thanks ❤️❤️❤️
very helpful video, but just wondering, can sets of 2 or less be transitive
Thanks! And yes, absolutely. In fact, relations defined on sets of two or less can’t NOT be transitive.
@@LearnYouSomeMath Woah that is actually really helpful haha thanks
THANK U!