I have flown into Anchorage several times and I don't understand why the pilot landed that way. There is terrain approaching Stevens Airport that should require you to take that angle of approach to land.
BUT, if you get a seat in the front of the DC-9/MD-80 you could hear almost everything else since the engine noise was low. Re-engined DC-8s were cool too.
My friends that DC-9 pilot has been flying in ALaska his or her entire life I think?? That was greasy as hell!! You see the timing on the reverse thrust too? haha....he was feeling it that day. The old line between good and cocky sure means a lot in flying. Confidence kills just as easy as it is required too.
The Anchorage landing took me back to the days on RAA Electras, landing on Adak with near zero visibility, and the pilot using bush pilot techniques, would essentially create enough visibility to set the bird down. Beats going on to Shemya or back to Anchorage! Bush pilots are the best!
Here's a valuable tip to Lucaas as he didn't seem to learn some subtle nuances after uploading so many videos. Never ever doctor the video with gimmicks like slow motion as it tends to spoil the authentic experience of the viewer. If you still feel the gimmicks need to be added then show the raw unedited footage FIRST and then replay the video again with the editing.
@@lucaasCool... In that case, do him a favour and forward the comment to him. It wii also help you as all opinions here are reflecting on you as people tend to unsubscribe from YOUR channel and not his.
Once did two when landing at Seattle from London Heathrow. Very bumpy approach and a high crosswind. The first attempt, we could almost see in the general direction we were heading. The second was more of the same. I'm glad he got it down on the third attempt because otherwise we'd have been diverted to Portland in Oregon
That last clip::: Couldn't understand the last clip location, and closed caption couldn't either. Going by a sign in one of the buildings, stating 934th Airlift Wing, places it in Minneapolis Minnesota.
DC-9 pilot probably just reliving his Navy days flying into GTMO. You have to basically do a stop, drop and roll on approach to avoid Cuban airspace. Pucker factor of 10.
When this Arizona boy years ago flew out of Florida to the Cayman Islands in a 707, That's when I experienced what an actual storm was, And we landed on a runway about as long as airplane, yet that pilot didn't go around one time, I would be pretty nervous if we went around three times and there wasn't a hurricane..
Oh wait, so you were talking about the DC nine well, the DC nine. There’s something wrong with something and actually the pilots were actually drunk so they click the button and then bow they’re dead.
Agreed, tire could have also been flapping around and wrapped itself around something important in the landing gear bay, which would have been even more problematic.
How else you going to meet second segment climb? Is the gear well designed to hold a flaming tire? Why assume they're on fire? Do you think the crew knew that they blew a tire?
You upload them yourself here on RUclips with just the original sound no music, and then you tell Lucaas that you have some footage they can use, and they might or might not use it. They might have a thing where you have to send them an email granting them permission to use your footage "officially", for reasons of avoiding copyright strikes, I'm not sure.
That is an extremely short take off for an A350. They make excuses here in SLC that the runway is 2000 feet short to have A350's takeoff here, when it's been done. It's all corporate excuses. The Church of LDS chartered two A350's going to Manilla out of here. Money talks, so don't tell me it can't be done. Delta treats SLC like a regional airport. This is Delta's ONLY hub, that does not have a flight to HND or INC.
The 767's take-off wasn't "wrong." A tire blew almost at the time that the plane reached take-off speed. At that point, pilots are trained to quickly assess the situation and decide to either abort the take-off or continue it. The pilots did what they were trained to do and chose to continue the take-off. If the pilots had made a different choice, the 767 could have come to a stop before the end of the runway, as 767s are designed and built to do. If the problem had been different and an engine had blown instead of a tire, the pilots could have continued the take-off and climbed out on one engine because twin-engine airliners are designed and built to do that, too. This time, the pilots continued the take-off, burned off a lot of fuel, and safely delivered their passengers to the destination on their tickets.
The 767 takeoff goes wrong at 2:00 is Flight Simulator, you dingus. You can tell by how the framerate stutters at precise intervals, to say nothing of the anti-aliasing falling short on the edges of the scenery objects, and the visibility falling off like CGI rather than how it does in IRL. I called it within the first 2 seconds. If you would be original and not try to copy the original guy who does these videos, maybe you would be a bit more observant.
So why is it that you are the only one who feels that way ? There are actual aviators on this channel who'd call it out, or maybe you're the type who calls a dog mad and shoots it
What is up with the 767-300's? They always are having issues. And that Anchorage plane isn't a DC-9 It's a MD-80. Though technically you can call it a DC-9 Super 80. (DC-9-80) MD-80's have bigger engines than the DC-9's had. DC-9's had the JT8D-17 family of engines. This plane at 1:15 had the JT8D-200 family of engines (bigger than the 17's)
DC-9 approach is wild
Yes, well done!
That landing reminded me of Thai Airways’ old slogan: Smooth as silk.
Reminds us of the Kai Tak Airport.
@@nathanielcruz6675 yay with that crazy approach especially how long ago it was
pilot said "I've got controls...."
Damn that A350 take off tho...
Airbus’ version of the Plastic Princess.
it was a maintanence flight
Getting close to C-17 level of take-off
@@dfwplanespotters_ytIt was a ferry flight this plane was delivered brand new so they sent it to ATL to get out into service
I'm guessing it was empty.
That DC-9 landing was a thing of beauty! 😁
That DC-9 landing was a masterclass! Dang!
Very skilled pilot on that DC-9 approach. A350 is such a good looking aircraft
Better than Boeing I think 🤔
DC-9 approach feels like the pilots passed out and the only knowledgable passenger is a guy very proficient in having fun in X-Plane
This is md80
@@piotrrys6313dc-9 is a different thing than a md-80, learn more
Top comment XD
The DL 763 tire blowing happened several years ago at DTW.
I honestly didn’t know Airbus had an STOL version of the A350.
😂
A340 watching this ☠️
@@resadrecebli2263340 can do the same when light.
Probably empty
They're using it on their new transpacific flights from SNA. They'll make a killing!
That A350 must have been an empty repositioning flight
It’s called a ferry
Wow the DC9 landing is so amazing
Good thing there was no strong wind shear at the time of that landing of that Anchorage jet....
Just like with any other landing.
I have flown into Anchorage several times and I don't understand why the pilot landed that way. There is terrain approaching Stevens Airport that should require you to take that angle of approach to land.
Love the dc9 landing... so elegant
Just kissed the ground ❤
Love the way DC9 landed 🤗
AirFrance pilot should seek out the MD-80 driver in Anchorage for some help with approach and landing technique.
Man, good crew on the DC9👌
Only the real ones know what happens when you blow a tire during takeoff 💀💀💀
You land on a hotel unfortunately 😢
RIP Concorde
I'm pretty sure whoever does the crew's laundry is fully aware.
Air France 4590
Looks like a MD80 not DC9, but landing is just amazing. Probably wasn't stabilized but pilot did a great job.
I remember that day.
I’d just did a line before trying to get on the ground.
It always freaks me out to see all the cabling and lines underneath the air brake flaps.
You mean the spoilers?
@@yeet1337 I rather like "air brake flaps". Sounds sexier than "spoilers".
@@yeet1337they’re all wing flaps at the end of the day.
@@inncogneato6341no they aren’t
I was on a DC-9 in the 70s, was super loud at the back due to the adjacent engines...was also on a DC-8 in 1965
I wished I‘d experience the same man! Sick
BUT, if you get a seat in the front of the DC-9/MD-80 you could hear almost everything else since the engine noise was low. Re-engined DC-8s were cool too.
@@eljeffe8806 ya got that right
My friends that DC-9 pilot has been flying in ALaska his or her entire life I think?? That was greasy as hell!! You see the timing on the reverse thrust too? haha....he was feeling it that day. The old line between good and cocky sure means a lot in flying. Confidence kills just as easy as it is required too.
Air France seems to struggle a lot lately. Anyway, third attempt was a great one.
That DC9 landing must have a military pilot, that's mad.
Great dc-9 landing.. wonder which cargo it works for it didn't appear to be an airline
Need a refresher in the definition of "gone wrong"
Each week it's the same with the clickbait titles. It's annoying.
The Anchorage DC-9 overshot the runway. Had to zig back to the centerline.
The Anchorage landing took me back to the days on RAA Electras, landing on Adak with near zero visibility, and the pilot using bush pilot techniques, would essentially create enough visibility to set the bird down. Beats going on to Shemya or back to Anchorage!
Bush pilots are the best!
Here's a valuable tip to Lucaas as he didn't seem to learn some subtle nuances after uploading so many videos.
Never ever doctor the video with gimmicks like slow motion as it tends to spoil the authentic experience of the viewer.
If you still feel the gimmicks need to be added then show the raw unedited footage FIRST and then replay the video again with the editing.
The video was slowed down by the original uploader, not me
@@lucaasCool... In that case, do him a favour and forward the comment to him. It wii also help you as all opinions here are reflecting on you as people tend to unsubscribe from YOUR channel and not his.
N520DN is a brand new airplane, right before the Delta 2024 Olympics A350. probably on one of its first repo flights
Nice clips!
Where was that 321 taking off from? Tatooine?
Incredible stuff
Imagine being so lucky to experience 2 go arounds - my dream 😅
Once did two when landing at Seattle from London Heathrow. Very bumpy approach and a high crosswind. The first attempt, we could almost see in the general direction we were heading. The second was more of the same. I'm glad he got it down on the third attempt because otherwise we'd have been diverted to Portland in Oregon
767 takeoff with the blown tire reminds me of Nigeria Airways Flight 2120.
Another great video brother from the imperial county California 👍🇺🇲
thanks for the very nice video.. ✈✈
That last clip::: Couldn't understand the last clip location, and closed caption couldn't either. Going by a sign in one of the buildings, stating 934th Airlift Wing, places it in Minneapolis Minnesota.
The last clip was in MSP/KMSP. It was a brand new aircraft, flying from MSP-ATL. Empty, maintenance ferry flight. Look up Calvin's MSP Aviation.
2:30 "This Airbus A350 made a very short takeoff from Minneapolis."
DC-9 pilot probably just reliving his Navy days flying into GTMO. You have to basically do a stop, drop and roll on approach to avoid Cuban airspace. Pucker factor of 10.
Air France proving you really can always go around, if it don't look right coming down. :-)
When this Arizona boy years ago flew out of Florida to the Cayman Islands in a 707, That's when I experienced what an actual storm was, And we landed on a runway about as long as airplane, yet that pilot didn't go around one time, I would be pretty nervous if we went around three times and there wasn't a hurricane..
That md80 landed almost 6000 feet down the runway. Ridiculous.
Oh wait, so you were talking about the DC nine well, the DC nine. There’s something wrong with something and actually the pilots were actually drunk so they click the button and then bow they’re dead.
0:43 IT’S A MD 80 DUDE
Its dc 9
No md 80 it’s long and btw I commented this 3 months ago and just noticed
2:11 looks like Gran Canaria? Don’t remember them having that kind of weather in winter…
It’s a very common meteorological phenomenon on the Canary Islands, it’s called Calima and is caused by Sahara’s desert dust in suspension.
It's actually Flight Simulator. lol Total CGI. Look at the frame rate artifacts.
@@SteveKasianyou literally need to touch grass 😅
@@kingsharkoon I'm already touchin' cotton...
what the hell im quite litterally looking at anchorage on flight radar lol
The dc9 was a really good landing
the DC-9 was a runway change
I heard that guy just didn't want to land cuz he was watching the in flight movie and hadn't finished his complimentary bag of honey roasted peanuts.
That A350 was bad a**!!
bro the a220 has to go arounds 2 TIMES.
Why continue to destination with a blown tyre? Surely retracting that blown tyre into the landing gear bay poses a risk?
Good videos 📷👍
Check out landing at Isafjordur Iceland .
"80kts." "Check" "Rotate" "positive rate" "Gear up" .... "V1"
76 from Metro…heading to MUC?
In 0:49 the airpline was md80, not dc9
Nope thats dc 9
@@marsifire5216 no, dc 9 was smaller, engines was much smaller
@@piotrrys6313 it has variants it has dc9-30 -40 and -50 this is the 50 varient
0:43 This is a MD83 - not a DC 9
Luckily, no one was injured...
The second video is what would I do on a flight simulator
A321 aborted take-off looks like LPA (Las Palmas, Gran Canaria)?
Yep with a strong Calima too, maybe the reason for instrument failure.
It is indeed!
Air France took three attempts - but it was the right choice as it was a safe landing.
I don't think pulling landing gear up was good decision. Tire or brakes could be on fire.
Agreed, tire could have also been flapping around and wrapped itself around something important in the landing gear bay, which would have been even more problematic.
Odds are he didn't know.
How else you going to meet second segment climb? Is the gear well designed to hold a flaming tire? Why assume they're on fire? Do you think the crew knew that they blew a tire?
Super cher lucaas 👍👍👍🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦
Crazy
How do I upload videos to this guy that posts these videos I have several take offs and landings
You upload them yourself here on RUclips with just the original sound no music, and then you tell Lucaas that you have some footage they can use, and they might or might not use it.
They might have a thing where you have to send them an email granting them permission to use your footage "officially", for reasons of avoiding copyright strikes, I'm not sure.
@@44R0Ndin I'm not sure how to do that
Nice video
Every media outlet in America right now Boeing jets have faulty tires
What a Coincidence 🤣👍🤙
third and successful attempt ❌ third and final attempt 💀
The falloff is insane
DC-9...not exactly a "stabilized approach" 😮
The 350 was empty.
"Aye-r-buss"?
Airbus for da wiiiin
Dc9 pilot ex navy lol
Looks like an MD80 not DC9
Cool
That is an extremely short take off for an A350. They make excuses here in SLC that the runway is 2000 feet short to have A350's takeoff here, when it's been done. It's all corporate excuses. The Church of LDS chartered two A350's going to Manilla out of here. Money talks, so don't tell me it can't be done. Delta treats SLC like a regional airport. This is Delta's ONLY hub, that does not have a flight to HND or INC.
1:37 planes changed
DC-9 got 3rd person
Delta flying more Airbus than Boeing…….
Delta quietly retired their 777's during the pandemic and all their newer twin-aisle aircraft are Airbus. They like their 767/757 fleet
clearly the blown tire is Boeing's fault
There is no 767
of course its a boing
Yeah cause Boeing makes tires
❤ from India
or the bottom was wrong.
Yeah I think his call sign is dc big balls.... I like your longer vids..
Bruh whatdehell
But good hustle no hate
Of course boeing again lol💀💀💀
Seriously dude? Why didn’t you mention the 76 video was 12 years old?
That DC-9 approach is animation.
Not. The pilot was asked by the tower if he could switch runways because of a 747 coming fast behind him.
@@saito125 How do you know that?
The 767's take-off wasn't "wrong." A tire blew almost at the time that the plane reached take-off speed. At that point, pilots are trained to quickly assess the situation and decide to either abort the take-off or continue it. The pilots did what they were trained to do and chose to continue the take-off. If the pilots had made a different choice, the 767 could have come to a stop before the end of the runway, as 767s are designed and built to do. If the problem had been different and an engine had blown instead of a tire, the pilots could have continued the take-off and climbed out on one engine because twin-engine airliners are designed and built to do that, too. This time, the pilots continued the take-off, burned off a lot of fuel, and safely delivered their passengers to the destination on their tickets.
It's also likely they weren't aware of it at all.
✈️
W vid
Gee Airbus had a problem with instruments!!!!!!
The 767 takeoff goes wrong at 2:00 is Flight Simulator, you dingus.
You can tell by how the framerate stutters at precise intervals, to say nothing of the anti-aliasing falling short on the edges of the scenery objects, and the visibility falling off like CGI rather than how it does in IRL. I called it within the first 2 seconds.
If you would be original and not try to copy the original guy who does these videos, maybe you would be a bit more observant.
So why is it that you are the only one who feels that way ?
There are actual aviators on this channel who'd call it out, or maybe you're the type who calls a dog mad and shoots it
@@verifiedtoxicangel2411 People are gullible and dumb. That is an age-old fact of life that is made CLEARLY evident on youtube!
The take-off did not go wrong. It was successful.
It was not as planned is probably what he is trying to say
Clickbait. Just a blown tire! Takeoff went just fine. How about 767 blows tire on takeoff roll. 🙄
I mean, it did went wrong. They expected the takeoff to be normal and smooth. Not to deal with a blown tire.
What is up with the 767-300's? They always are having issues. And that Anchorage plane isn't a DC-9 It's a MD-80. Though technically you can call it a DC-9 Super 80. (DC-9-80) MD-80's have bigger engines than the DC-9's had. DC-9's had the JT8D-17 family of engines. This plane at 1:15 had the JT8D-200 family of engines (bigger than the 17's)