Given that he sounds like a raving fanboy, it's not to be trusted anyway. The lack of mention of microtransactions, the glossing over of server issues, inaccurate statements about prior voice acting....it just doesn't sound like an impartial review.
Me kinda + fancy an RPG type game for the evening. Never played Diablo games so between this, Fallout 3, going for the legendary edition of Mass Effect OR something else someone recommends!
At this point I'm so skeptical of Blizzard that I'm gonna wait a few months to see if they won't just introduce terrible monetization after the reviews are done and people have bought the game.
"Speaking of friends, Diablo 4 is great for making them since an online connection is required to push back the forces of evil." IGN, blink twice if Blizzard was standing over your shoulder when you wrote this script.
Really bad ques for the first week like anything popular that will stabilize about a week after launch and only be an issue in the future for big patches or new seasons drops. Like always. Game companies don't decide their server space available based on random popularity spikes, they use the average, so launches and big patches etc will always have lines and DC issues.
@@Agumon5 This right here. Exactly why I'm staying away as much as I'd like to play it. Not going to support a $70 game with any kind of item store + 3 battle passes (cosmetic or not).
@@danielfonville1840 problem with d2 is you lvl faster with other players , and its better with friends them random players whe the person gets the loot are the one who reacts the fastest, and if you make a bad build its tough luck
Since Baldur's Gate 3 came out this microtransactional battlepass moneygrab called Diablo IV has become not only irrelevant but downright despicable in my eyes.
Enjoy it while it lasts mates. But remember who the publisher and developer is. And remember their track record. ESPECIALLY with it always having to be online...
Yeah, let's remember their track record. A few decades of great games and a small rough patch with one studio that wasn't involved with making this game.
This game certainly IS NOT amazing. As experienced player of franchise, to me this is one of the most uninteresting sequels, washed, bleak and boring. Gloomy grey graphics is very repulsive and story is just... ugh. Plus a lot of glitches and bugs. Certainly Blizzard is not going in right direction.
skillup has got a very in depth review up that highlights alot of its positives & negatives. Biggest issues he had was aggressive level scaling & loot not adding any real benefits.
@@Phalxxx That should be no surprise in 2023. Even 50% of solo only games have required online access, which is only a problem when you are traveling tbh...
Diablo immortal 2.0. Dont worry instead of milking you with microtransactions they are gonna get ya for 70-100$. Itemization and endgame will be virtually the same. Will be a short lived blizzard cash grab. Content creators will milk it for a month and the hype will be dead and moved on
It’s been a long time since I’ve been this excited! Diablo 4 and Street Fighter 6 in the same weekend and Final Fantasy 16 later this month.. it’s a pretty exciting time
Blizzard doesn't let you even look at the price of the game without signing up and logging in to their website. i've never seen this rubbish anywhere else.
When conducting a review please don’t talk about the end of the game. People want to discover the end for themselves and not have it given away in some silly so called review. So amateurish! What’s wrong with people?
Not a single mention of couch co-op in the review... For those wondering every version except pc supports 2 player couch co-op. Edited to not say split-screen as the screen doesn't split 😅
Me suddenly realizing this and street fighter 6 come out on the same day and that FF16 is coming out a week later was like waking up to getting smacked in the face by a frying pan.
$70 price tag, and all the other questionable design choices, bugs, and repetitive randomized dungeon bosses, I'd say 7/8. The way this reviewer acts sometimes seems like he has never played other ARPGS. He called something innovative or NEVER before seen, when cheaper/f2p ARPGS that are much older has already done those things lol. Don't get me wrong D4 isn't bad. But 9 is pushing it. Also the game can either get better, or they will ruin it like they have been doing with Overwatch and WoW classic. Blizzards/Actisisions greed knows no end. Activision has even made COD p2w and is pissing off all their consumers.
No mention at all about the in game purchases, the train wreck that was Diablo Immortals monetization or Blizzards recent practices. For this reason alone I'm avoiding it. It feels like they're hiding something if they're not talking about it.
Seems hella repetitive, idk gaming formula for PS2 games.. just upgraded graphics and put it on ps5 lol idk how to get into this side scrolling button mashing thing
Does IGN practice self-reflection? With an average user score of 2.2(!) on Metacritic, you might wonder how IGN could give this game a 9? Or has IGN become a marketing tool of the gaming industry?
@Metallica Fan Well, it's going to be part of the game. Wouldn't you go over all of the games aspects in a review? Especially something new to a mainline Diablo game?
@@keke6547 I'd argue it's still an aspect of the game that a reviewer should at the very least go over. Omitting it entirely is more concerning to me personally.
@@keke6547 Battle pass items are items they removed from a FULL price game and separately monetized. Any items in the battle pass is content they decided not to give player out of greed. It doesn't matter if its cosmetic or not, these should be earnable rewards for people who own the game. The game also has a shop. When did our standards get so low that we are protecting battlepass. Battlepass has NEVER been about P2W. Stop licking the boot.
My biggest concern was the fact that it will be pretty "expensive" to reset skilltrees at a certain point. Hope they changed that cause I'm not grinding gold for hours and hours just to try a different build though
The review is so positive. And the game looks tempting enough for me to buy a PC to be able to play. Something that makes me a bit nervous, a quick google search shows that they reviewed Diablo 3 with an even higher rating: 9.5/10. So... mmmm. IDK. With a game like this it's almost like I'd need to wait 6+ months to have complete and reliable messages coming from the player base.
@@Moistrazmataz Oh well buddy. This isn’t surprising. Every single game does it. Is it ideal? No. Is it lame? Yeah. But whining on the internet about cosmetics costing $28 is not the move. Just get use to it. It’s been a trend for all Triple A games for like 5 years. We can all cry about it with you. But regardless, I’m probably gonna buy a skin and most likely be happy with my purchase too.
Aiming with your mouse is generally faster and more consistent. It's crossplay anyway, so plugging a controller into your PC will give a similar experience as console and let you play with console friends
Every test channel saying they spent 80 hours to complete the game makes me think they Just asked the developers how long it takes to complete the game. 😉
@Nykaitcha that’s actually not really true, blizzard generally has pretty solid launches in terms of traffic and queues. There’s only a few examples of them fumbling
When a review makes zero mention of a game's microtransactions, you know it's not to be fully trusted.
Exactly. Especially a company with such an exploitative track record.
Who cares about cosmetics really?
My thoughts exactly... my first watch of an IGN review in years and they don't mention the most contentious part of the game..
Totally, even if it's only cosmetic based, you still need to talk about it to show off what cosmetics are 'in store' for gamers (pun intended) lol
Given that he sounds like a raving fanboy, it's not to be trusted anyway. The lack of mention of microtransactions, the glossing over of server issues, inaccurate statements about prior voice acting....it just doesn't sound like an impartial review.
Who’s here because of gamepass? 😂🤣
I’m A Druid Lvl 28 Rn 💪
Pretty Solid Game
Level 40 Sorcerer right here. 😅
hey man
Me kinda + fancy an RPG type game for the evening. Never played Diablo games so between this, Fallout 3, going for the legendary edition of Mass Effect OR something else someone recommends!
@@seanyboy3 Definitely Play The Mass Effect Trilogy ❤️💯
Not gunna lie; Presenting “always online” as a plus, is a bit sus
Offline + Crossplatform = Cheaters destroying the game. If you don't see always online as a plus you are delusional.
@@TheVideomaster138 tell that to every online only game that shutdown making the game you bought worthless.
@@whatsitmatter9541 probably be in 10 to 14 years until then diablo 5 will realese
@@TheVideomaster138 if you think always online games are free from cheaters you're delusional.
Yeah, there's no legitimate reason to completely disallow offline play. You lose the events and multiplayer, big deal.
At this point I'm so skeptical of Blizzard that I'm gonna wait a few months to see if they won't just introduce terrible monetization after the reviews are done and people have bought the game.
It’s Blizz. They’re going to. Why wait? You’re going to buy it regardless.
poor baby
Same boat.
I've decided to wait about a year and a half for the expansion
Looks the same as Diablo 3. That aint gonna cut it. Look at how much innovation went into Street Fighter 6 and Tears of the Kingdom.
So is IGN ever going to acknowledge they steered many people wrong? As far as I'm concerned, IGN is just as guilty as Blizzard.
They didn’t steer anyone wrong the game is great
Diablo IV, Street Fighter 6, and Final Fantasy 16 all in one month!!!!!
Amazing month indeed, let's hope they are actual finished and polished games...
2 out of 3 are apparently complete
Not to mention Flash, Spider-Man and Transformers complimenting each release, per week. Insane month of media
@Superman With A Gun apparently?
FF16 looks dumb.
"Speaking of friends, Diablo 4 is great for making them since an online connection is required to push back the forces of evil."
IGN, blink twice if Blizzard was standing over your shoulder when you wrote this script.
Additional commentary from the hive mind - thanks guy.
@@UniversalCypher Count me in as well then, cause the hive's right on this one
@@Rico-nj3vl- the hive mind is always right - isn't it...
Take your tin foil hat off.
@@legacyoftheash7327 No, thank you. It's fashionable and comfortable.
The dumbest thing they have done is limit this to 4 players. Why have they gone backwards. You can't even have a party with all the classes.
I'm glad they kept it similar to the successful formula. Diablo players mostly want two things: Build options and tons of loot
Tons of OWN loot = equals not much sense for trading= item value diminishes = no economy= game crapola and non addictive
successful formula was D2.
D3 however was disaster and D4 following same formula is disaster too
@@ns4529 bingo
yeah this game hasn't got much of either.
Yeah that's not in here tho?
My concerns are not with the game itself, but rather how Blizzard will drop the ball during launch or on post-launch.
Really bad ques for the first week like anything popular that will stabilize about a week after launch and only be an issue in the future for big patches or new seasons drops. Like always.
Game companies don't decide their server space available based on random popularity spikes, they use the average, so launches and big patches etc will always have lines and DC issues.
@@DavidSmith-wr5sj it's not just server issues let's be real. It's modern blizzard, they will find a way to ruin it.
Microtransactions .... Wait and see.
The concerns have turned into expectations at this point, it will be a terrible launch.
@@Agumon5 This right here. Exactly why I'm staying away as much as I'd like to play it. Not going to support a $70 game with any kind of item store + 3 battle passes (cosmetic or not).
They gave D2 a 7 while giving D4 a 9 😂 insanity
d2 didnt't age well
@@hercuflesit aged like fine wine as soon as this garbage came out
@@danielfonville1840 problem with d2 is you lvl faster with other players , and its better with friends them random players whe the person gets the loot are the one who reacts the fastest, and if you make a bad build its tough luck
@@danielfonville1840no it didn’t
Warning - highest level achieved by reviewer is 50. Never made it to tier IV content.. bro just did the campaign in a party… 😂
IGN gave Diablo 3 a 9.5 at launch.
Doing the lords work appreciate it
The Baker in my street gave it a 8.5 at launch.
... and 90% of this review could be transplanted word for word and be indistinguishable from what they said about Diablo 3 on release
This really should be getting more attention.
POE was still in beta when D3 released
The sounds in this game...I haven't played it yet but just watching and hearing every slash, thump, slam and frost tinkle tankle...it sounds perfect.
Youve clearly never played Diablo 2.
omg
@@TravisH-nm9fy D2 sounds great, for its time.
@@TravisH-nm9fy d2 fans try not to mention it 24/7 challenge
Corpse Explosion sounds amazing.
Since Baldur's Gate 3 came out this microtransactional battlepass moneygrab called Diablo IV has become not only irrelevant but downright despicable in my eyes.
Why are you comparing a action game to a strategy RPG?
@@tundrazzr3659 why are you commenting on youtube comments?
@@tundrazzr3659because they are very similar, you sub 80 iq mouthbreather
Enjoy it while it lasts mates. But remember who the publisher and developer is. And remember their track record. ESPECIALLY with it always having to be online...
Yeah, let's remember their track record. A few decades of great games and a small rough patch with one studio that wasn't involved with making this game.
@@DerekScottBland 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wait a month and see how Blizzard ruins it with industry leading worst monetization.
Just be rich
@@Worick_ stupidest reply ever
just buy a house
reviewers already showed the shop its just cosmetics
Don't you guys have wallets?
If Blizzard wasn't the company behind it, I'd be more interested. They're going to find a way to let everyone down again.
This game certainly IS NOT amazing. As experienced player of franchise, to me this is one of the most uninteresting sequels, washed, bleak and boring. Gloomy grey graphics is very repulsive and story is just... ugh. Plus a lot of glitches and bugs. Certainly Blizzard is not going in right direction.
The hardest decision when this game drops is going to be… which class to pick 😮
Diablo has always been made to make one of each haha. The replayability is endless
The working class.
The hardest decision when this game drops is going to be… how much money are you able to spend?
Im going twisting blade rogue
Druid for those big numbers 😁
Lost credibility at "dense skill tree". It's shallow af. There's 4 classes of skills and 4 choices each. Like what
Will be nice to see the unpaid reviews in a few days when it's released to the general public.
after the added battle pass too
Not a fan of the 'mandatory online' aspect
wait for user reviews
skillup has got a very in depth review up that highlights alot of its positives & negatives. Biggest issues he had was aggressive level scaling & loot not adding any real benefits.
@@Phalxxx That should be no surprise in 2023. Even 50% of solo only games have required online access, which is only a problem when you are traveling tbh...
An always online requirement being passed off as a social "feature". IGN must really think we're dumb.
Turns out the majority of cucks here are just as dumb.
Looks boring after playing Diablo 1 2 and 3 just looks like the same crap thats over priced.
Soooo, the story is bad, the minios are boring and most bosses are forgettable. There's also connectivity issues and lots of bugs. But still 9/10? XD
Bugs will be fixed, story won't be played more than once. The first part you invented.
Diablo immortal 2.0. Dont worry instead of milking you with microtransactions they are gonna get ya for 70-100$. Itemization and endgame will be virtually the same. Will be a short lived blizzard cash grab. Content creators will milk it for a month and the hype will be dead and moved on
In 10 years when Diablo 4 is still the best ARPG out there you will think back to this comment you made
@@TheVideomaster138 thats a weird way of spelling POE 2
I'm just hoping to get $60 worth of play before they ruin it. Which they WILL do.
@@Bunster poe has 30k daily player peak, D4 had over 2 million in beta alone. Poe 2 will be the same as poe with better graphics thats it.
This video aged very quickly. 2.2 player score and falling.
Well, turns out this review was a straight up lie.
No one was expecting ground breaking new gameplay innovations, just a fun game.
I’ll be playing with my nephew and friend who have never played Diablo until the beta. So for them it’s a whole new game.
@@dallastexas5653for me too
100%! A lot of modern games have seem to have forgotten the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mantra.
@@Wsherwoodking Too many games fall under “if it ain’t broke, break it”
What ground breaking innovations? Lol they literally just took ideas from games that were better and FAR cheaper than D3.
It’s been a long time since I’ve been this excited! Diablo 4 and Street Fighter 6 in the same weekend and Final Fantasy 16 later this month.. it’s a pretty exciting time
And amnesia bunker ;o
Nerd alert.
And poo poo doo doo feces 3 return of the lost dingleberry
@Matthew Zadrov oh you're a nerd too, you're here watching this video buddy
Get a job lmfao
Ign on aaa game: fun even though with so many issues 9/10
Ign on indie game: Very fun but has minor issues, 5/10
XD
Stop giving Blizzard your money
This review is brought to you by Activision Blizzard.
>Best day one game release ever
>Well, game have constant teleport bug and weak story.
>BEST DAY ONE RELEASE EVER.
Not a single word about microtransactions or battle pass? How can you consider this review complete?
Chain lightning was great in the beta
It Was Amazing Bro.. Loved It
@@BigJayDNP have to get the full game, I’m broke now
It got nerfed
@@Amplifymagic still powerful
@@Amplifymagicit still wrecks
You better talk about the monetization. If not you guys can safely ignore this review. If he does I’ll delete this comment.
Gamers now are so annoying, they want every new game to be some masterpiece. It really just shows how many big babies there are out there nowadays.
Blizzard doesn't let you even look at the price of the game without signing up and logging in to their website. i've never seen this rubbish anywhere else.
No mention of the insane lag on PS5 which makes the game unplayable!
The game can only be played while connected to Blizzard server!
how can you give it a 9 if it's full of bugs, does almost nothing new, and by your own admission has a shitty story?
They can't hear you while counting the money Blizzard shoved in their bank account
When conducting a review please don’t talk about the end of the game. People want to discover the end for themselves and not have it given away in some silly so called review. So amateurish! What’s wrong with people?
Didn't mention anything about monetisation
Not a single mention of couch co-op in the review...
For those wondering every version except pc supports 2 player couch co-op.
Edited to not say split-screen as the screen doesn't split 😅
Is it split screen or shared screen like you need to stay in the same view of eachother?
Shared
The devs, talked about this and many other features theyve been pretty up front with everything to.....
@leftoverzaggy fairplay to the devs but this is IGN' review and they don't mention what is a selling point to many.
Me suddenly realizing this and street fighter 6 come out on the same day and that FF16 is coming out a week later was like waking up to getting smacked in the face by a frying pan.
How do you not address monetization when discussing a blizzard game post diablo immortal?!?
$70 price tag, and all the other questionable design choices, bugs, and repetitive randomized dungeon bosses, I'd say 7/8. The way this reviewer acts sometimes seems like he has never played other ARPGS. He called something innovative or NEVER before seen, when cheaper/f2p ARPGS that are much older has already done those things lol. Don't get me wrong D4 isn't bad. But 9 is pushing it. Also the game can either get better, or they will ruin it like they have been doing with Overwatch and WoW classic. Blizzards/Actisisions greed knows no end. Activision has even made COD p2w and is pissing off all their consumers.
They skipped over the big question: how much will the monetization ruin the game?
what do you think lol 💰💰💰
No mention at all about the in game purchases, the train wreck that was Diablo Immortals monetization or Blizzards recent practices. For this reason alone I'm avoiding it. It feels like they're hiding something if they're not talking about it.
Seems hella repetitive, idk gaming formula for PS2 games.. just upgraded graphics and put it on ps5 lol idk how to get into this side scrolling button mashing thing
Diablo "Veteran" sounds like he is talking about Diablo for the first time.
Did they just gave major spoilers for the story in a review? WTF
Does IGN practice self-reflection? With an average user score of 2.2(!) on Metacritic, you might wonder how IGN could give this game a 9? Or has IGN become a marketing tool of the gaming industry?
this sounds WAY too positive. IGN are you under duress?
under a massive cheque
under Duriel
No talk about the battle pass stuff is concerning....
What is there to talk about? You unlock new looks
@Metallica Fan Well, it's going to be part of the game. Wouldn't you go over all of the games aspects in a review? Especially something new to a mainline Diablo game?
@@WolfyWagsTail but its for cosmetics its not important to the over all game or anything players have to worry about
@@keke6547 I'd argue it's still an aspect of the game that a reviewer should at the very least go over. Omitting it entirely is more concerning to me personally.
@@keke6547 Battle pass items are items they removed from a FULL price game and separately monetized.
Any items in the battle pass is content they decided not to give player out of greed. It doesn't matter if its cosmetic or not, these should be earnable rewards for people who own the game. The game also has a shop. When did our standards get so low that we are protecting battlepass. Battlepass has NEVER been about P2W. Stop licking the boot.
This guy’s commentary seems so fake and misleading
This aged like milk
@@swallowedinthesea11this aged like milk
IGN is a marketing firm
Dont forget its blizzard guys. Lower ur expectations - like, way lower
Not being forced to replay the campaign on alts is huge.
This is such a great year for gaming. Zelda FFXVI SF6 Diablo IV
praying for silksong
Been a bad year too: Forespoken, Redfall, Crime Boss, TLoU PC, Wanted: Dead, Golum
When you look at the sky at night, do you look at the stars or the space inbetween ?
Resident evil 4, dead space, Star Wars
re4, starfield, hellblade, tekken >>>
My biggest concern was the fact that it will be pretty "expensive" to reset skilltrees at a certain point. Hope they changed that cause I'm not grinding gold for hours and hours just to try a different build though
understandable but dungeons were dropping gold at a pretty high rate as you leveled up no ?
You can buy a spec reset in the shop for $2 /s
Just buy the battlepass
just swipe. It's the way Blizzard work today.
@@rundown132 so the game has microtransactions?
What a shame people will eat this up. Stop supporting companies like blizzard if you want the gaming industry to stop being the way it is
£70+ for a game that demands an additional cost of a PS Plus subscription for playing solo, Blizzard can go do one
This looks too flashy. The first Diablo had the best atmosphere, imo. They never topped it, with any sequels.
The review is so positive. And the game looks tempting enough for me to buy a PC to be able to play. Something that makes me a bit nervous, a quick google search shows that they reviewed Diablo 3 with an even higher rating: 9.5/10. So... mmmm. IDK. With a game like this it's almost like I'd need to wait 6+ months to have complete and reliable messages coming from the player base.
It’s def not worth buying a pc to play lmfao
You must be a complete moron to buy a PC for a mid range game lol
Lol. Lmao. 9/10? Are you sure about that?
Alien Isolation 5.9/10.......Goat Simulator 8.0/10...........I'm amazed how this page still has subscribers/
@nicolashrv don't get me started on days gone
Doesn't push the boundaries lmao. It's literally the building block for all a-rpgs for a few decades now.
Hope they still have things like cow runs, map hack etc. the type of stuff that made D2 and the expansion so great.
Maphack ? :P No need bro but cow level would be massive bow to D2
Cow runs and map hack are the two things you could come up with? You're so dumb...
The cow run would make D4 a 10/10
@@brendendwnah it wouldnt, they need to revamp the entire skill system for it to be a 10/10
No need for maphack because there's no randomly generated maps anymore.
Let's get a big W for all of us playing as rogues
Rogue will be my main
Yes sirrr
I'm stuck between rogue or barbarian
Rogue all the way
Rogue mains rise upp
You forgot to mention its 28 dollars for a single skin in the in-game store...
who tf cares about skins??? youre legit trolling lol
@@honzaranda7842 They should be in the game not the cash shop. Most people care, but you crack on and lap it up
@@Moistrazmataz Oh well buddy. This isn’t surprising. Every single game does it. Is it ideal? No. Is it lame? Yeah. But whining on the internet about cosmetics costing $28 is not the move. Just get use to it. It’s been a trend for all Triple A games for like 5 years. We can all cry about it with you. But regardless, I’m probably gonna buy a skin and most likely be happy with my purchase too.
Then don't buy them?
@@honzaranda7842 if nobody would care then it would not be in the store at the first place :)
Genius
No mention of the store or the battle pass……
This game is 8/10 if you play only story and thats it and 1/10 if you play endgame content for years to come
"Best Diablo'S ever been" heard enough
Best diablo's ever been..
Best diablo's ever been
Best's diablo ever's been
been ever's diablo best's
Best Diablo’s ever been 🫨
Great feedback! I’m curious how the game is different when played on PC vs PS5.
Have you tried playing on both platforms?
Thanks
It's not different.
it's designed to be played with a controller.
Aiming with your mouse is generally faster and more consistent. It's crossplay anyway, so plugging a controller into your PC will give a similar experience as console and let you play with console friends
@@kastaway-m4x A hack & slash with a controller 😮 No sense
No difference other than it runs smoother on the PS5 at over 60-120 fps. Really solid on PlayStation
Always online is a deal breaker for me. :disappointed:
its 2023u dont have internet to play but internet to comment?
No offline. As a traveling healthcare worker, they already lost me.
Every test channel saying they spent 80 hours to complete the game makes me think they Just asked the developers how long it takes to complete the game. 😉
Sounds like the review was written by Blizzard...
you mean the 80 hours you spent in sanctuary so your name is guaranteed on the statue of lillith right?
Seems like a decent game, but is Blizzard still a terrible company?
Yeah and yeah
Need PS plus to play ?
These casuals wanna be gamers saying that diablo looks like mobile game just because the isometric view... Lmao clowns, go back to fortnite kiddos.
Final fantasy 16* arpg genre need to get with the times.
Confirmed, this is going to be dogshit. Thanks IGN!
'Near perfect endgame' LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Let’s hope the servers will work, there’s no way they do not expect tons of players to be eagerly trying to play
Ha. They won't. Member WoW?
Well that's what the open beta was trying to stress test and it was pretty successful
Better than them attempting to release this past weekend/Monday when everyone was off of work
Don’t expect this in the first several days bro😂
@Nykaitcha that’s actually not really true, blizzard generally has pretty solid launches in terms of traffic and queues. There’s only a few examples of them fumbling
1:51
Nice to see that the disappearing weapon bug is still an issue for Necromancers. /sigh
Why would you be talking about an ending in a review of a game that is not out yet? Come on team.
Its 2023 and it doesnt have dynamic lighting
Diablo 2 was a 2D game and had that over 20 years ago
We are truly regressing
You can bet it will have P2W microtransactions though
In 3 weeks when the novelty factor wears off the player base will drop 80%.
just like every AAA game ever
Do you think this is some revelation… this happens with literally every title you dense twat.
They really want $70 for this?, amazing
The new font looks waaayyyy better and fits perfectly to the atmosphere. The old Sans Serif font was so off.
game is boring af. Blizzard played it too safe with this game , it was truly snooze worthy.
They used the word "diarrhea" to describe the effects on screen and followed it with a praise... the most flip floppity review I've ever seen.
You didn't mention sleazy monetization. This is a Blizzard game, after all.
We're 2/3 for the big games of June. Diablo 4 and Street Fighter 6 are both getting 9s. Wonder if Final Fantasy XVI will too
Final Fantasy XVI will get a 10/10
@@dev1lm4n63 Agreed.
@@bobbtonson1694 How do you suppose that?
@@SleepyFawn Source: trust me bro
Ff16 will be 88-92 metacritic score. I'm a gaming expert 👍
Starfield 7/10, this microtransaction hell 9/10....you kidding me?
Diablo IV has achieved the unachievable;
It's made Diablo 2 fans are slightly less whingy about it
as you can all tell, the reviewer was held hostage while recording this.
What a joke of a review
Let's go! No more wasting time with Destiny.
Felt this 😂
Lol Destiny catching stray bullets
Been uninstalled that atrocious mess of a game.
No wonder you like D4.
@@Kserijaro Poor you in so many ways.