Bruh the RTX 4070 Super takes less heat, makes lower CPU load, has average faster loading speed, higher average performance, and draw less power. It also have a lot of features. Plus, The RX 7800 XT (which the AMD XT suffix equals to NVIDIA Ti suffix) is, of course, HAVE to be better than the RTX 4070 Super since it's performance number is 8, means that it's kind of a high end card, compared to NVIDIA's 7, and the Super rating is of course lower than the TI rating in terms of performance. And don't forget the actual launch MSRP which the RX 7800 XT is $500 and the RTX 4070 Super is $550. Overall, just go with the RTX 4070 Super.
@@ashketchum7061 Not at such low RPM. That's the best thing about the Hellhound. The Nitro+ doesn't run by default at 900-1100 RPM. Watch KitGuruTech review of the Hellhound and you can see that when running noise normalized @40dB the Hellhound runs 6C cooler with a 11C cooler hotspot than the Nitro+. When run default like everyone does the Hellhound is 2-3C cooler and has a 7-8C cooler hotspot. I'm not saying the Nitro+ is loud or worse in any way, just that at the same default settings objectively it doesn't have better temps and noise level than the Hellhound.
Thank you for testing Monster Hunter World! I’m on the fence with getting a 4070 super. But I think I’ll keep my 7800xt. Seeing as world uses 10Gb VRAM I have to prepare for Wilds when it comes out.
It's actually $50 since the launch MSRP (not include inflation, supplies, and stuff) of the RTX 4070 Super is $550 and the RX 7800XT is $500. Overall, the RTX 4070 Super is better because of DLSS, ray tracing and other features, and the performance gap is not much. And don't bring up the "Um, actually, the RX 7800 XT is $400" because $499 is not $400, or the "Um, actually, AMD graphics cards have FSR" because NVIDIA cards can also use FSR somehow. FSR is just cheap DLSS.
Nah, 4070 super will be cheaper in the long run. 50 - 60w+ extra usage is quite big. You can recoup the extra money that you spent on a 4070 super instead of a 7800xt with how much money you'll be saving on electricity bill in just a few months. Plus, don't forget about DLSS and FG goodness. Your FPS will sky rocket turning that on.
4070 super goes braaap whit dls3 and rt performance also lower power use +alot more features for better image but its what you prefer both are best cards of this generation including 7900gre
I was considering an upgrade for my wifes rig. She currently has a 5600x/3070, playing UW 1440p. I think I am sold on the 7800xt, with the possibility of going with the GRE. Great video as always.
3070 > 7800xt? Too much money for such a small upgrade, maybe except you can sell your 3070 for a good price, get a 7800xt good price, 8gb VRAM isn’t enough for the game you are playing.
13th gen can use ddr4 too, but be sure to get the ddr4 mobo first, this days almost all good b660 mobo are gone, the remaining decent option is that gigabyte b660, but im sure it needs that bios update
@@JegsTV , sadly, but it's true. This game is real cpu benchmark.. One of the way is nvidia's "performance panel" with recording by something like OBS studio.
These video cards are purchased for games in QHD resolution, or for games with reduced graphics settings in 4K. A normal person will not play FHD on such video cards, they are in the wrong price segment and have excessive performance. For QHD and 4K resolutions, the I5 - 12400f processor is not a bottleneck. This is the first. The second thing is that the 7800xt video card really turned out to be very successful with a good amount of video memory. And this video card has a good basis for overclocking. At which it will show even better performance for less money. Personally, I don’t really need new chips from Nvidia. I like to play in real resolution, and not in low resolution, which was stretched to fill the entire screen. The raw performance of the video card is important to me.
I *do* play in 1440P, however I also have a 240Hz monitor and if I was playing a competitive game and the 1080P performance was much much better I, might use 1080P for sure. Some of my friends have 1080P monitors at 180 - 240hz as well, and they are also in the market for this type of card
@@jeremyg9305 Such games have a right to life, I don’t argue. And for such games, of course, the more frames the better. The quality of graphics is not particularly important in them. You can even buy video cards for them cheaper. I meant most people who play AAA games.
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i competitive games are pretty popular, most people playing a AAA shooter like COD or Apex care more about frames than graphics. League, Dota, CS, StarCraft - framerate is king in all these games.
@@jeremyg9305For most of these games, it's easier and cheaper to use other graphics cards. For example 7700xt or 3060ti or 4060ti. 6700xt or 6750xt. Especially in FullHD. Even 1660ti is good for playing Dota 2.
@@jeremyg9305These online games are well optimized and run with a good number of frames on not the latest and most powerful video cards. At the moment I'm talking about heavy AAA blockbusters, single-player games for which a large amount of memory and performance are needed for high screen resolutions.
I sold my rtx 4070 non S, buy this RX 7800 XT I missed those DLSS Frame Gen, but now AFMF is here. with lower temps and less noise. I'm happy with this :)
And those who like ray tracing may remember such an interesting and cool technology from Nvidia - PhysX. This is truly a great technology that Nvidia has been pushing. Now please tell me, in what modern games is it used? And this technology is much more interesting for games than ray tracing.
Ray Tracing is the future. I am happy that nVidia started pushing it. PhysX was a independent project and you needed to buy a PhysX card but nVidia bought it, today CPUs are so strong that there is no need for non CPU physics acceleration. In the other hand even though AMD still didn’t on the level of Ray Tracing as nVidia but they will sooner or later. I am using RT where I can and the image quality if the RT is well implemented could transform the game graphics. Though it is not a must have yet. 5 years and I think RT will be more popular.
@@PeterPaulsNvidia said the same thing about PhysX many years ago. That this is the future. And this technology adds much more realism than Ray tracing. These are destructible environments, great water realism, etc. Yes, and Ray tracing was not invented by Nvidia. It was used long before Nvidia started talking about it.
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i we are talking about real time ray tracing in games. It is the next step for realism. NVidia brought it into gaming still very demanding feature but as I remember my 8600GT wasn’t able to render Physix in Mirror’s Edge because the technology was too demanding, today a 6 core 12 thread CPU is able to render better physics than a videocard back in 2008. Ray Tracing has to mature but as I said that is the future. If ray tracing, especially path tracing will not be the mainstream lighting system we will never reach real realism in gaming. But I’m 100% sure that 8 years from now that will be the standard.
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i this is the point, physics became mainstream and nvidia (and before that ageia) has nothing to do with it… RT already a directX feature so sooner or later gpus will strong enough to run it just like what happened whit phisx.
The 7800 xt in this video's has a better cooler than the rtx 4070 S model. So you cant compare them, Also the 7800 xt uses more power so get hotter if you have a model with a bad cooler.
Hello, I have a r5 5600x (no oc), and today I got the rx7800xt from nitro, but I am getting roughly half of your fps in game, for example cyberpunk in fhd im getting low 60s, do you have any idea why I am underperforming?
Make sure ray tracing is off if you want performance like in the video, it still might be somewhat different due to cpu but I wouldn’t expect that big of a difference
You have a bottleneck. You need a better CPU to keep up with the GPU. Another alternative is to play at a higher resolution and graphical settings. I have a 5700x and I still get bottlenecked in CPU intensive games like cyberpunk, Starfield ect. Play at 1440p ultra settings, you will still get a slight bottleneck but it won't be as bad as playing at 1080p. .
В большинстве игр, за исключением call of duty, 7800xt обошла 4070с лишь благодаря более эффективной работе с процессором на dx12. Был бы здесь проц мощнее 4070с обошла бы в большинстве игр, т.к. она банально мощнее. Имейте это ввиду
Thanks for these benchmarks. Was torn between the 2. I play at 1440p, i dont care for ray tracing, not worth it imo. The 7800xt makes more sense. Similar / better performance, 4gb more Vram, 100 dollars cheaper. AMD won me over this time.
I took 4070s for me, for Itx case it is a must have. But clearly it is was a difficult choice on my build, the cpu was easy to choose xD Nzxt H1 V1 Asus strix B760-I 12400f 32Go DDR5 6000Mhz 4070s 2To nvme 650W 40 decibel on load, pretty ok Your test confirm I did good. I had a 1070 before xD
@@JegsTV there is no point in trying to take away the importance of ray tracing, nowadays 9 out of 10 games come with ray tracing, companies wanting to stop using lighting and reflections through rasterization and use only ray tracing, soon in the future games will come with native ray tracing, mandatory .
@@TheKlebiN FANBOY HERE WE HAVE A FANBOY HERE!!!!! let me put it simply there is ONLY 1 game that has full RT support and that is Cyberpunk.. and even 4090 runs only 40fps when full RT is on... so yea we are faaar away from RT actually being important.. only thing you should care is FPS/$ and right now and since 20 series Nvidia is not good
12400F creates a serious bottleneck on the 7800XT card. You can see it in 4K that there is less load on the processor, in my opinion a more powerful processor will give better results for the 7800XT.
Dont mind this buffoon. He knows nothing. Just your typical fanboy. Even nvidia cards can consume upto 14gbs of vram on diablo 4. Its the game not the hardware. Heres my test of the 4070ti super with 16gbs of vram ruclips.net/video/KctfXrookPs/видео.htmlsi=S1MxV01EM9G827NJ
@@d4nith3 You have no idea what you are talking about. That's not the actual amount of Vram used, it's what the game is alloc... you know what, never mind. I swear these Nvidia fanboys are something else lol.
very strange the 4070 super on all sites beat the 7800xt by a good margin, only on your channel strangely the 7800xt is winning, this is suspiciously sabotaged!
With Rt, dlss 3 and frame génération, rtx 4070s is much better than Amd .. rasterisation is not an argument in 2024, only if yoy play cs2 only.. and about random crashing, unstable drivers, bsod for unknow reason and multiples rebooting.. AMD is really late on all this technology!
@@alypaches4528 yup, if most of the fanboys that come here use their brain for a second, they would know that both GPUs are bottlenecked by the 12400f causing the 7800xt to have a slight lead on 1080p as its easier for the CPU to keep up on the frames it produces. But hey, get tunnel visioned by your fanboyism and only consider the 4070 super getting outperformed by its rival.
thats what i was talking about. 7800XT for 500$ is a best deal i ever made
same Hellhound has been awesome
but do you know rx 7900 gre have 500$ too?
@@ASHBORN9527 i bought my card before gre was released
I think if both have same price then etx4070S is a best deal imo
Bruh the RTX 4070 Super takes less heat, makes lower CPU load, has average faster loading speed, higher average performance, and draw less power. It also have a lot of features. Plus, The RX 7800 XT (which the AMD XT suffix equals to NVIDIA Ti suffix) is, of course, HAVE to be better than the RTX 4070 Super since it's performance number is 8, means that it's kind of a high end card, compared to NVIDIA's 7, and the Super rating is of course lower than the TI rating in terms of performance. And don't forget the actual launch MSRP which the RX 7800 XT is $500 and the RTX 4070 Super is $550. Overall, just go with the RTX 4070 Super.
Wow I'm pretty impressed with the result on RX 7800 XT here.
i have it now 5 months and i am so happy with it
Been watching videos and reading all over the place for 2 weeks, decided on a 7800 (already have 12400) thanks (y)
temperature/fan speed on hellhound, love it
Tengo la rx 7800xt nitro + y sus temperaturas son mejores
@@ashketchum7061 Not at such low RPM. That's the best thing about the Hellhound. The Nitro+ doesn't run by default at 900-1100 RPM. Watch KitGuruTech review of the Hellhound and you can see that when running noise normalized @40dB the Hellhound runs 6C cooler with a 11C cooler hotspot than the Nitro+. When run default like everyone does the Hellhound is 2-3C cooler and has a 7-8C cooler hotspot. I'm not saying the Nitro+ is loud or worse in any way, just that at the same default settings objectively it doesn't have better temps and noise level than the Hellhound.
Thank you for testing Monster Hunter World! I’m on the fence with getting a 4070 super. But I think I’ll keep my 7800xt. Seeing as world uses 10Gb VRAM I have to prepare for Wilds when it comes out.
just get a 7900 GRE it costs the same but gives either equal or greater performance in games
The price difference between them is $200. Certainly, the AMD card wins
It's actually $50 since the launch MSRP (not include inflation, supplies, and stuff) of the RTX 4070 Super is $550 and the RX 7800XT is $500. Overall, the RTX 4070 Super is better because of DLSS, ray tracing and other features, and the performance gap is not much.
And don't bring up the "Um, actually, the RX 7800 XT is $400" because $499 is not $400, or the "Um, actually, AMD graphics cards have FSR" because NVIDIA cards can also use FSR somehow. FSR is just cheap DLSS.
value for money, clear winner 7800xt
In pure rastered games it wins!
Only without ray traycing... power consumption is 50watt more aswell
Nah, 4070 super will be cheaper in the long run. 50 - 60w+ extra usage is quite big. You can recoup the extra money that you spent on a 4070 super instead of a 7800xt with how much money you'll be saving on electricity bill in just a few months.
Plus, don't forget about DLSS and FG goodness. Your FPS will sky rocket turning that on.
@@orimu836 i only play in native
@@orimu836 and in my country 4070 super is like 1k dollars
4070 super goes braaap whit dls3 and rt performance also lower power use +alot more features for better image but its what you prefer both are best cards of this generation including 7900gre
Any chance you be testing the 7900 GRE?
I was considering an upgrade for my wifes rig. She currently has a 5600x/3070, playing UW 1440p. I think I am sold on the 7800xt, with the possibility of going with the GRE. Great video as always.
im also reviewing the GRE soon. gonna compare it with the 7800xt to cater to you guys who are deciding between the two. :)
@@JegsTV and compare with a 4070 super please
3070 > 7800xt? Too much money for such a small upgrade, maybe except you can sell your 3070 for a good price, get a 7800xt good price, 8gb VRAM isn’t enough for the game you are playing.
Bro you don't even need upgrade
Rtx 3070 is a good gpu
@@G_O_A_T__W.B8gb isn't gonna hold up. It's recommended to have 12gb for 1440p and soon that will be the minimum
Can you still recommend i5 12400f in 2024? I just got new ddr4 ram and I don't wanna waste them by getting 13th gen
Its still a decent cpu for gaming. But if you have the means get the 13th or 14th gen cpus with ddr5 rams
13th gen can use ddr4 too, but be sure to get the ddr4 mobo first, this days almost all good b660 mobo are gone, the remaining decent option is that gigabyte b660, but im sure it needs that bios update
@@JegsTV, can u test 12400f vs 13600k with 4060ti in battlefield 2042 1080p 128 players ?🙏
@@user-qy1lv6pm8h testing battlefield 2042 is pretty much impossible. They blocked third party overlays.
@@JegsTV , sadly, but it's true. This game is real cpu benchmark.. One of the way is nvidia's "performance panel" with recording by something like OBS studio.
These video cards are purchased for games in QHD resolution, or for games with reduced graphics settings in 4K. A normal person will not play FHD on such video cards, they are in the wrong price segment and have excessive performance. For QHD and 4K resolutions, the I5 - 12400f processor is not a bottleneck. This is the first. The second thing is that the 7800xt video card really turned out to be very successful with a good amount of video memory. And this video card has a good basis for overclocking. At which it will show even better performance for less money. Personally, I don’t really need new chips from Nvidia. I like to play in real resolution, and not in low resolution, which was stretched to fill the entire screen. The raw performance of the video card is important to me.
I *do* play in 1440P, however I also have a 240Hz monitor and if I was playing a competitive game and the 1080P performance was much much better I, might use 1080P for sure.
Some of my friends have 1080P monitors at 180 - 240hz as well, and they are also in the market for this type of card
@@jeremyg9305 Such games have a right to life, I don’t argue. And for such games, of course, the more frames the better. The quality of graphics is not particularly important in them. You can even buy video cards for them cheaper. I meant most people who play AAA games.
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i competitive games are pretty popular, most people playing a AAA shooter like COD or Apex care more about frames than graphics. League, Dota, CS, StarCraft - framerate is king in all these games.
@@jeremyg9305For most of these games, it's easier and cheaper to use other graphics cards. For example 7700xt or 3060ti or 4060ti. 6700xt or 6750xt. Especially in FullHD. Even 1660ti is good for playing Dota 2.
@@jeremyg9305These online games are well optimized and run with a good number of frames on not the latest and most powerful video cards. At the moment I'm talking about heavy AAA blockbusters, single-player games for which a large amount of memory and performance are needed for high screen resolutions.
If you can in the future can you do a comparison between the 7900GRE vs 7800xt ? Thanks 👍
7900gre + performance
I sold my rtx 4070 non S, buy this RX 7800 XT
I missed those DLSS Frame Gen, but now AFMF is here. with lower temps and less noise. I'm happy with this :)
That's dumb.
Yea what a dummy
And those who like ray tracing may remember such an interesting and cool technology from Nvidia - PhysX. This is truly a great technology that Nvidia has been pushing. Now please tell me, in what modern games is it used? And this technology is much more interesting for games than ray tracing.
Ray Tracing is the future. I am happy that nVidia started pushing it. PhysX was a independent project and you needed to buy a PhysX card but nVidia bought it, today CPUs are so strong that there is no need for non CPU physics acceleration. In the other hand even though AMD still didn’t on the level of Ray Tracing as nVidia but they will sooner or later. I am using RT where I can and the image quality if the RT is well implemented could transform the game graphics. Though it is not a must have yet. 5 years and I think RT will be more popular.
@@PeterPaulsNvidia said the same thing about PhysX many years ago. That this is the future. And this technology adds much more realism than Ray tracing. These are destructible environments, great water realism, etc. Yes, and Ray tracing was not invented by Nvidia. It was used long before Nvidia started talking about it.
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i we are talking about real time ray tracing in games. It is the next step for realism. NVidia brought it into gaming still very demanding feature but as I remember my 8600GT wasn’t able to render Physix in Mirror’s Edge because the technology was too demanding, today a 6 core 12 thread CPU is able to render better physics than a videocard back in 2008. Ray Tracing has to mature but as I said that is the future. If ray tracing, especially path tracing will not be the mainstream lighting system we will never reach real realism in gaming. But I’m 100% sure that 8 years from now that will be the standard.
@@PeterPaulsPlease name modern AAA games that use Nvidia's PhysX technology for greater realism?
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i this is the point, physics became mainstream and nvidia (and before that ageia) has nothing to do with it… RT already a directX feature so sooner or later gpus will strong enough to run it just like what happened whit phisx.
Why this test is not with ultra setting rt?
The only problem with the rx 7800xt is that it performs very similar to the rx 6800xt, which you can find at much lower price
Less temps, less noise = longer life , 7800 xt wins .
The 7800 xt in this video's has a better cooler than the rtx 4070 S model.
So you cant compare them, Also the 7800 xt uses more power so get hotter if you have a model with a bad cooler.
but way more power consumption
@@rubenn7212 okay i got your point.
jegs if i pair the i5 12400f with the rtx 4070 super for playing on 1080p is it problem of a bottleneck or its fine ?
Bottleneck my dude. If you check the video the 4070 super would sometimes have
@@JegsTV for me its i7 10700 and i planning to buy 4070s, will i have to update my proc soon?
@@voidqwerty7833 if you play on 1080p then yes. if you play on 1440p your cpu will still be fine.
Hello, I have a r5 5600x (no oc), and today I got the rx7800xt from nitro, but I am getting roughly half of your fps in game, for example cyberpunk in fhd im getting low 60s, do you have any idea why I am underperforming?
Make sure ray tracing is off if you want performance like in the video, it still might be somewhat different due to cpu but I wouldn’t expect that big of a difference
You have a bottleneck. You need a better CPU to keep up with the GPU. Another alternative is to play at a higher resolution and graphical settings. I have a 5700x and I still get bottlenecked in CPU intensive games like cyberpunk, Starfield ect. Play at 1440p ultra settings, you will still get a slight bottleneck but it won't be as bad as playing at 1080p. .
Had exactly the same problem. R5 5600x with 7800x cause bottleneck even in 1440p. I bouth new am5 motherboard + r5 7600 and works perfect now
В большинстве игр, за исключением call of duty, 7800xt обошла 4070с лишь благодаря более эффективной работе с процессором на dx12. Был бы здесь проц мощнее 4070с обошла бы в большинстве игр, т.к. она банально мощнее. Имейте это ввиду
7800 xt !!!
What is the program that these videos use that shows all of the info on screen like that in regards to performance?
Afterburner
@JegsTV thanks man. My build is happening today 4070 Super and Ryzen 7 7800x3D. Wanted to see what's happening when I try out some games.
Pre kaya ba ng seasonic 550w gold ang undervolted 7900 gre?
technically kaya 290w lang tdp ng 7900 GRE. pero just to be safe get at least 600-650w na PSU
Thanks for these benchmarks. Was torn between the 2. I play at 1440p, i dont care for ray tracing, not worth it imo. The 7800xt makes more sense. Similar / better performance, 4gb more Vram, 100 dollars cheaper. AMD won me over this time.
Pre pwede bang Ryzen 5 5600 instead i5 12400f dito? Same performance pa din ba?
Yes paps. Same lang naman ipc performance nyang 5600 at 12400f
@@JegsTV yown! Salamat paps!
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER White OC Edition vs. MSI GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12G GAMING X SLIM WHITE: A Comparative Analysis - GCC Gamers?
not mentioning the better image quality of DLSS from the 4070 super ist a bit sad. of course rasterization is next to equal performance
Ain't the 12 400f cause bottleneck?
it does on 1080p
@@JegsTV one more question can go for the ryzen 5 7600 with rtx 4070 super
Yes. Those are good pairing. Also tested those pairing check the channel for the video
It bottlenecks more rtx 4070 super.
Gpu usage is higher on rx 7800 xt.
Both great cards.
paps tingin mo ba bottleneck na yang 12400f?
bottleneck na yan paps sa 1080p. pag di na umaabot GPU usage to 90%, aside from unoptimization, ibig sabihin di na kaya sabayan ni CPU ang GPU.
Finally. 🔥🙌🏿
is 12400f and 7800 xt good for 1440p ?
the 7800 xt is a 1440p card, so yes
I took 4070s for me, for Itx case it is a must have. But clearly it is was a difficult choice on my build, the cpu was easy to choose xD
Nzxt H1 V1
Asus strix B760-I
12400f
32Go DDR5 6000Mhz
4070s
2To nvme
650W
40 decibel on load, pretty ok
Your test confirm I did good.
I had a 1070 before xD
Rx 570 4gb version here
Im surprised 4070 s is better for tarkov do you know why?
Tarkov is better optimized for Nvidia Gpus. Optimization is a huge factor when it comes to getting the fps you want.
Can i build a pc with 7800 xt under 1000 ?
I bought this card for $475 from Gigabyte. Yes, you can
Which gpu stays more cooler if we playing games for long time?
Is 7800xt better?
they trade blows in performance with the rtx 4070 super having a slight edge. but in terms of value the rx 7800 xt is way ahead.
@@JegsTV raster any gpu runs well, now only running rasterization takes all the advantage of nvidia which has much stronger ray tracing.
@@JegsTV there is no point in trying to take away the importance of ray tracing, nowadays 9 out of 10 games come with ray tracing, companies wanting to stop using lighting and reflections through rasterization and use only ray tracing, soon in the future games will come with native ray tracing, mandatory .
@@TheKlebiNpara ese tiempo ni la rtx 4090 podrá con esos juegos imagínate la 4070
@@TheKlebiN FANBOY HERE WE HAVE A FANBOY HERE!!!!! let me put it simply there is ONLY 1 game that has full RT support and that is Cyberpunk.. and even 4090 runs only 40fps when full RT is on... so yea we are faaar away from RT actually being important.. only thing you should care is FPS/$ and right now and since 20 series Nvidia is not good
this is convince me, that i do not need uprgade my CPU.
hi! what do u think can i pair 7800xt with 5700x3d for 1440p?
yeah. should work fine
Молодец 👍, продолжай.
Mega zadowolony z rx7800xt nitro
12400F creates a serious bottleneck on the 7800XT card. You can see it in 4K that there is less load on the processor,
in my opinion a more powerful processor will give better results for the 7800XT.
Non DLSS, non Generation 4000, non nvidia reflex, non rey traysing, Prise 550 vs 620))))))Lol 4070 Super MWP
GOLD
good
this test ...12400f .........impossible 4070s or 7800xt possible 3070
U should do rt test and dls3 /fsr rt
why do they compare a 599-620 dollar gpu and a 500 dollar gpu lmao
To see what $120 difference gets you. 😂
@@JegsTV evidently not much glad i went with the 7800XT with the 13600k Tho instead thankfully thanks for clearing that up lil guy
Упор в процессор
Diablo 4 eats 15 GB of vram!? 😮
Only on AMD gpus because AMD gpus needs more vram to do the same thing what nvidia does with less vram.
Dont mind this buffoon. He knows nothing. Just your typical fanboy.
Even nvidia cards can consume upto 14gbs of vram on diablo 4. Its the game not the hardware. Heres my test of the 4070ti super with 16gbs of vram ruclips.net/video/KctfXrookPs/видео.htmlsi=S1MxV01EM9G827NJ
@@d4nith3 ah yes, a typical nvidia meat rider.
@@d4nith3 You have no idea what you are talking about. That's not the actual amount of Vram used, it's what the game is alloc... you know what, never mind. I swear these Nvidia fanboys are something else lol.
@JegsTV Ur benchmarks are sus, not accurate, big difference between other benchmark videos even though the specs are the same.
very strange the 4070 super on all sites beat the 7800xt by a good margin, only on your channel strangely the 7800xt is winning, this is suspiciously sabotaged!
the witcher 3 you can see that 4070 super is under used, your system is bottlenecking it
Sabotage? Lmao. Calm down fanboy.
The 4070s was ahead 9/15 games tested here. So i dont even know how you came up with that conclusion. Maybe curb down your fanboyism a bit?
4070 super ain’t even that much better calm down
@@Exotiq-hi9ogit's 10%
The only reason that performance difference wasn't shown, was the small bottleneck from the 12400f
With Rt, dlss 3 and frame génération, rtx 4070s is much better than Amd .. rasterisation is not an argument in 2024, only if yoy play cs2 only.. and about random crashing, unstable drivers, bsod for unknow reason and multiples rebooting.. AMD is really late on all this technology!
Enjoy spending 200$ more on those insignificant merits lol
фуфло а не тест!!! 4070 супер мощнее 7800хт,причем на порядок!!!
truth hurts
@@JegsTV Hurts, Hardware Unboxed can confirm.
@@alypaches4528 yup, if most of the fanboys that come here use their brain for a second, they would know that both GPUs are bottlenecked by the 12400f causing the 7800xt to have a slight lead on 1080p as its easier for the CPU to keep up on the frames it produces. But hey, get tunnel visioned by your fanboyism and only consider the 4070 super getting outperformed by its rival.
raster any gpu runs well, now only running rasterization takes all the advantage of nvidia which has much stronger ray tracing.
Trazado de rayos es payasada
okay noted im getting a 7800xt