With all the black smoke coming out the back, the air filters are very dirty. August 1969, I was bored out of my skull on a Sunday afternoon in Fort Hood, Texas. I was getting out in a few days. I went down to the motor pool and picked one of these bad boys out for a joy ride. These due a pivot steer in neutral , it’s called a neutral steer. You -it it in neutral and turn the wheel in the direction you want to rotate, then step on the gas. It will chew up black top in a heart beat. Well.........I got caught. My motor sergeant and company commander were waiting for me, with flames coming out of every opening on their bodies. I was headed to the stockade, a dishonorable discharge after an impeccable untarnished three year service. BUT.......the army wanted me to stay. They offered me a TON of cash for a six year hitch. I was 21 at the time, with real serious problems. I should have stayed in. I am 74 now, and everything hurts like crazy. In twenty years, I would have been 38 with full benefits. Then double dip with civil service, and my retirement would have been almost $15,000.00 each month tax free. If I could turn back that clock right now, today, this very second...I would not hesitate. BUGSY 2/23 inf Korea, 1968 camp dodge and camp Lawton. Btln. maint.
Having ridden in an M60 tank USMC. The driver has a limited field of vision. While he can drive down a road or follow another vehicle. When maneuvering on or off a Landing craft or a transport the driver requires input from observers
In fact, I don't think it is necessary to give the M60 to Ukraine, because it is impossible to fight against Russian tanks on the battlefield. I think it is more appropriate to give them T72 or T80.
@@1-761 Certainly all former Warsaw Pact countries should give Ukraine every T72 they've got (the Soviets kept their T80s to themselves in those days, so for those you need to look at former Soviet republics). But eventually they are going to run out of the old Cold War era equipment that's been kept in storage and we are going to need to give Ukraine newly produced equipment. And that means at some point we are going to need to make the transition to training Ukrainian tankers on newly produced western tanks, since the supply of old Soviet tanks that they are already familiar with will have run dry. That means at some point we will need to start giving the Ukrainians Abrams and Leopard 2s (unless the Russians give up before we get to that point). Certainly if we still have any M60s in storage we might as well hand them over to Ukraine as well, and western European countries should hand over whatever Leopard 1s they still have in storage.
No country should "give" or "hand over" anything to anyone that may potentially weaken their own ability to defend themselves against any number of threats that exist around the world. Selling (...yes selling) surplus equipment is one thing but depleting front line stocks of MBT's such as Abrams and Leopards is dangerous and irresponsible when threats like China and Russia are very real and very possible.
@@d.r.4453 Helping Ukraine fight Russia is directly related to our security in Europe, and has the potential to cripple a long time strategic adversary. We should foot the entire bill for Ukraine's defense. We should overmatch the entire Russian GDP in aid to Ukraine (Russia's GDP is 1.6 trillion dollars, our GDP is 20 trillion, and the rest of NATO is another 20 trillion, it would cost us 4% of our respective GDPs to overmatch the entire Russian GDP). We spent trillions on Iraq and Afghanistan, wars which had no impact at all on our security or interests. We can afford to spend a few hundred billion dollars on a war which is absolutely central to our interests. Ukraine's defense IS our security. We have the manufacturing capability to replace anything we send to Ukraine. And in the meantime, while we ramp up our wartime production, we can afford to temporarily weaken our own forces in order to strengthen Ukraine's, since Russia has already committed all of their available forces to Ukraine and is physically unable to threaten any other country at the moment with conventional forces. China is another issue of course. But a war with China will mostly be an air and naval war. And I am not proposing that we send any ships to Ukraine. We should probably send some aircraft. But we have thousands to spare and our main issue in a war with China will be a lack of basing space for the aircraft we have, so we wouldn't be able to use all of our aircraft at once anyway. Additionally, doubling down on our support for Ukraine directly aids our security posture against China, as it is massively helpful in demonstrating to China that Taiwan will not stand alone if they are attacked. Sending a message to China that aggression will not be ignored is every bit as important as our physical capabilities. It may even buy us some time to increase our physical capabilities. There is even some hope that our assistance to Ukraine will deter China from invading Taiwan at all, but I still think it is very likely that China will invade by 2027. If China's invasion of Taiwan kicks off while the war in Ukraine is still ongoing, or shortly after it ends, then our ramp up of military production to aid Ukraine could actually be directly translated into wartime production capacity to be used against China.
引擎有問題了，黑煙太多代表燃燒不完全，因為是柴油引擎...保修士應該沒有料件換了才讓戰車上車
靠北~這黑煙冒的...
難不成是 煙霧示標器，出戰的時候告訴敵人 " I'm here (我在這裡)！" 用的？
駕駛算是很穩了，四級廠技工開法簡直是特技，但野戰駕駛兵是不敢那樣開的啦！🤣
CM-11勇虎もカッコいいけど、M60パットンも渋くてカッコいい👍
砲為什麼向後面？ 不然就戳到卡車駕駛室了啊😂😂
其實運輸模式砲管會轉向後面 從二戰以來就是這樣
一方面是不要碰到前方車體任何地方 最主要是
萬一遭敵襲 車子基本上已經被固定在板車上
就算沒有固定 也沒有時間慢慢的開下去
沒辦法再下去轉砲塔~ 目標若在運輸車後方
或是左右邊任何方位 砲塔都可以任意瞄準開炮
那麼坦克砲管要是在前面 旋轉會干涉到運輸車任何地方
那將無法轉跑塔過去後面迎敵~ 只能任人宰割
若目標在運輸車前方? 也不可能直接開砲~
駕駛會先變成砲灰 會由駕駛去轉向 交給坦克收拾目標~
基本上目標只有正前方左右30度是死角要靠駕駛轉向
其他方位對於砲塔已經事先轉到後方的戰車來說均無死角
可以任意開砲 所以這是運輸中都轉到後面最主要的原因
我還以為駕駛開了發煙功能…
哈哈M60A3日常
黑煙是正常的，發煙功能是白煙
民國90年，我們營上戰車一半壞砲塔、一半地盤有問題，下基地全連沒幾輛戰車能說100％OK的，打戰車砲實彈還跟別營借車QQ....
我們是修一台壞兩台，所以練習時常常出沒幾台車，正式演習那天，第一次我們整連全車修好（3-4個月以來），其他連都嚇一跳
@@gyakutake 哈哈
@@gyakutake 真是两岸一家亲，大陆那边也是一样
那你們的裝備妥善率跟一級保養人員跟二級場履保人員都是狗屎，主官也是個智障
然在在高層眼裡都是沒問題的，因為他們看到的都是假資料
柴油泵要調一下
正常的啦
保修連有保養嗎？
駕駛可能忘記關煙霧產生器，才會一直冒黑煙
煙霧產生器的煙是白色的 很明顯 這部戰車引擎有問題了
環保局要開單了
只能有一個指揮 卡車司機是來亂的 戰駕是經過訓練的 看的是指揮者的手勢 有經驗的軍官會請卡車司機離開
這台煙也太大了吧 服役時沒看過煙這麼大的
吃柴油的哪有不冒煙的
@@davidcheng3109 沒 這台煙真的大 柴油引擎積碳太多 燃燒不完全
@@SuperJohntest 這台引擎肯定出問題了
這台基本上不會冒那麼黑那麼多的煙! 要送廠檢查了
明顯訓練不足。引擎空氣濾清器太髒需要更換。
最後上車後前進，更需要有人打手勢指揮，為何反而那人走掉了?
With all the black smoke coming out the back, the air filters are very dirty. August 1969, I was bored out of my skull on a Sunday afternoon in Fort Hood, Texas. I was getting out in a few days. I went down to the motor pool and picked one of these bad boys out for a joy ride. These due a pivot steer in neutral , it’s called a neutral steer. You -it it in neutral and turn the wheel in the direction you want to rotate, then step on the gas.
It will chew up black top in a heart beat. Well.........I got caught. My motor sergeant and company commander were waiting for me, with flames coming out of every opening on their bodies. I was headed to the stockade, a dishonorable discharge after an impeccable untarnished three year service. BUT.......the army wanted me to stay. They offered me a TON of cash for a six year hitch. I was 21 at the time, with real serious problems. I should have stayed in. I am 74 now, and everything hurts like crazy. In twenty years, I would have been 38 with full benefits. Then double dip with civil service, and my retirement would have been almost $15,000.00 each month tax free.
If I could turn back that clock right now, today, this very second...I would not hesitate. BUGSY 2/23 inf Korea, 1968 camp dodge and camp Lawton. Btln. maint.
砲在後面是行軍中的意思嗎？
一台戰車兩個人在比方向,這很容易讓駕駛分心
Having ridden in an M60 tank USMC. The driver has a limited field of vision. While he can drive down a road or follow another vehicle. When maneuvering on or off a Landing craft or a transport the driver requires input from observers
這下面留言有啥好吵的啊，，
一看就是引擎出了問題。
不然你看其他視屏，有沒有這樣冒黑煙。
3:48戴蓝头盔的这哥们好惨~
這是上板車耶 怎麼一直放煙霧 M48上板車也沒這樣 是要縮缸喔 還是要去驗車看看 哈哈哈哈哈
外行人提問一下，指揮者直接用無線電跟駕駛溝通，會不會更好一點？
戰車聲音超級大聲
一定是靠手勢指揮.
不會 看手勢跟本體感覺反應會更快
駕駛艙的視線很小 有人指揮是正確的
戰車這麼吵聽的到是嗎？要不用line講啊
沒有倒車顯影嗎
空袭指示烟可还行，这小姐是发动机出问题了吧
這部tank的引擎多久未有維護保養！？
保養是一定有保養的，但就跟汽車一樣。
四五十年前的車引擎跟燃油效率就是比較差，燒的還是柴油，
很多零件也根本就停產了，再怎麼保養效果也有限。
砲向後是為了收納方便喔
砲管也被鎖上了
鎖著固定
這應該是引擎有問題而要上板車拖回四級維修吧！
等停好，太阳下山了。
這車是燒媒的嗎？
駕駛優秀....看看俄羅斯戰車駕駛翻車的畫面你就知道了
砲管向後，不會頂到前面，而且此時駕駛可以直接從駕駛室爬過去炮塔裡面，砲管在前時，從駕駛室過去超難鑽的😅
我有爬過!我是仰著爬到駕駛室的...
我也爬過真的難爬，戰駕兵路過
趴著 之後滑出來 砲管在後炮塔出常撞到頭 題外 炮管在後一定要固定
我的天, 這個煙敵人在10公里外都知道你在哪裡 !!
@@LLLarryyy 大哥，煙會往上飄，那麼濃的煙，10公里外絕對看得到！
@@LLLarryyy 五專以後升二技
@@caskinghsieh5005 你要考慮的風的問題，煙也會自動散去
是是是，反正敵人看不到，就讓他繼續冒煙吧，偉哉台灣人邏輯，遇到問題不是解決，而是把頭往地上一塞啥都看不到了，真棒
@@caskinghsieh5005 坦克都是這樣的，吃柴油你還想他不冒黑煙？
煙這麼大！平時會被環保局取締！戰時很難不被敵人發現！看來引擎要大修了！
打仗的時候可以偽裝已經被擊中降低敵人戒心。
@@monstertsai13 現代戰爭講求匿踪！況且飛彈有紅外缐追踪熱源；砲彈有雷射導引，加上無人機的使用，要偽裝欺敵並不容易！
这环保坦克是烧稻草的?
這個煙 還沒打就先投降了
Check your air filters
最新戰略上板車也要煙幕掩護
M1A2呢！燒一斤排出8兩煙，這古董車一定很貴吧！
這排煙讓我想到火力發電廠煙囪
北七 上面一個指揮 下面一個指揮 真不知道在幹嘛
靠，是在學遼寧號呀？怕敵人不知道你在哪？
這是撩寧號!
這能打嗎？
渦輪增壓壞掉嗎？煙者麼大
You people forget to “Think P.M.C.S” !!
老車無罪!!!
這指揮者 顯然沒有駕駛經驗 現場有三個指揮 駕駛要看誰的???
戰車接近板車時是看站在板車上的對板軍官，上板車後是看在指揮台的連長或是副連長
這留言者 顯然沒有從軍經驗 你如果是駕駛現場誰下指令就聽誰的 你還是把刺槍練好，乖乖當炮灰
這台是壞掉了吧
还是圆炮台，模块化还没实现
其實台灣買完那一批M1A2T就好 不用繼續執著在戰車 國軍反而更適合的是自走砲
指揮人員應該站在拖板車的最前端一次站定，與戰車成一直線，不必移動也比較沒有危險。
其實那用途不一樣你知道嗎
The Ukrainians need these tanks more than ever. Give the Taiwanese the M-1 and send these to M-60’s to Ukraine.
It would probably be easier to just send M1s to both of them. It's not exactly like we have a shortage.
In fact, I don't think it is necessary to give the M60 to Ukraine, because it is impossible to fight against Russian tanks on the battlefield. I think it is more appropriate to give them T72 or T80.
@@1-761 Certainly all former Warsaw Pact countries should give Ukraine every T72 they've got (the Soviets kept their T80s to themselves in those days, so for those you need to look at former Soviet republics). But eventually they are going to run out of the old Cold War era equipment that's been kept in storage and we are going to need to give Ukraine newly produced equipment. And that means at some point we are going to need to make the transition to training Ukrainian tankers on newly produced western tanks, since the supply of old Soviet tanks that they are already familiar with will have run dry. That means at some point we will need to start giving the Ukrainians Abrams and Leopard 2s (unless the Russians give up before we get to that point). Certainly if we still have any M60s in storage we might as well hand them over to Ukraine as well, and western European countries should hand over whatever Leopard 1s they still have in storage.
No country should "give" or "hand over" anything to anyone that may potentially weaken their own ability to defend themselves against any number of threats that exist around the world. Selling (...yes selling) surplus equipment is one thing but depleting front line stocks of MBT's such as Abrams and Leopards is dangerous and irresponsible when threats like China and Russia are very real and very possible.
@@d.r.4453 Helping Ukraine fight Russia is directly related to our security in Europe, and has the potential to cripple a long time strategic adversary. We should foot the entire bill for Ukraine's defense. We should overmatch the entire Russian GDP in aid to Ukraine (Russia's GDP is 1.6 trillion dollars, our GDP is 20 trillion, and the rest of NATO is another 20 trillion, it would cost us 4% of our respective GDPs to overmatch the entire Russian GDP). We spent trillions on Iraq and Afghanistan, wars which had no impact at all on our security or interests. We can afford to spend a few hundred billion dollars on a war which is absolutely central to our interests. Ukraine's defense IS our security. We have the manufacturing capability to replace anything we send to Ukraine. And in the meantime, while we ramp up our wartime production, we can afford to temporarily weaken our own forces in order to strengthen Ukraine's, since Russia has already committed all of their available forces to Ukraine and is physically unable to threaten any other country at the moment with conventional forces.
China is another issue of course. But a war with China will mostly be an air and naval war. And I am not proposing that we send any ships to Ukraine. We should probably send some aircraft. But we have thousands to spare and our main issue in a war with China will be a lack of basing space for the aircraft we have, so we wouldn't be able to use all of our aircraft at once anyway. Additionally, doubling down on our support for Ukraine directly aids our security posture against China, as it is massively helpful in demonstrating to China that Taiwan will not stand alone if they are attacked. Sending a message to China that aggression will not be ignored is every bit as important as our physical capabilities. It may even buy us some time to increase our physical capabilities. There is even some hope that our assistance to Ukraine will deter China from invading Taiwan at all, but I still think it is very likely that China will invade by 2027. If China's invasion of Taiwan kicks off while the war in Ukraine is still ongoing, or shortly after it ends, then our ramp up of military production to aid Ukraine could actually be directly translated into wartime production capacity to be used against China.
聽說用尿素可以減少黑煙
不知真假
引擎上機油了
感覺這這砲塔換個m1a2 視覺就差好多 冒黑煙黑煙
裝個10台這馬路就報廢了吧？
排氣量真大啊！
富油燃烧导致不完全燃烧
這技術，哈哈😄
以台灣的能力，車身自造不難吧。反正M60的裝甲也不是什麼高難度的東西，引擎和系統去買就可以了吧?
这坦克型号有些老旧了，如果自造，德国豹2，还有美国M1A2都比这个要好
@@山上彻也-t9s 菜雞啊你也翻牆一下M1以經買了
花錢買了就能自己建造量產嗎，以你的智商很難跟你解釋太多
主要是 沒必要吧
畢竟這貨過時了
我們需要更新的裝備與劃時代的戰鬥思維
就是買不到引擎和火控
冒黑煙的老爺坦克只能當靶用
你造一台不會冒煙的坦克來😂
坦克烧柴油的，难免有些黑烟 。
你就是靶，你還是炮灰，你還是乖乖去練基本教練跟刺槍術
唉！ 台灣真得不需要過多的履帶甲車，輪式車輛更適合台灣！
我的天吖，這是要報廢的前照是嗎？如果我國的戰車都是這樣的那還打什麼打，直接投降好了。
有買新戰車阿
你要投降是你的事情
我們的國家我們自己打
慢走不送
@@wiwi2709 說得好
最新黑科技，敵我交戰時，冒出一大團黑煙，敵人以為被擊中了，就會尋找下一目標，此時就可趁其不備與以反擊。😁😁😁
就不要讓我在教召時找到你
這煙也太大了吧？這如果在戰時，恐怕敵人老遠就看到了，還能活命嗎？還有，這戰車上架也太久了吧？要是戰時，等那些指揮員弄好，戰事已經完了吧，還有，看到了那些指揮員在指揮，沒有美軍那麼好，好像都沒有協調好，這讓駕駛員壓力很大呢，看有那麼多人，其他的好像都在隔岸觀火，唉~~~😭
戰時就不用上架直接開走了啦！平常訓練需要板車或火車運是因為安全，還有台灣有些道路根本承不住履帶壓。
oh M60 can still on duty 60 years, haha
旁邊阿兵哥
好可憐
一臉黑🙂
怎麼是台烏賊車！？
空氣污染沒有人管還放到網路上
真丟臉
這種戰車能打仗嗎？
这坦克年代有点久远了。
光這樣的中型戰車都能破壞我們柏油路了 更何況M1A1
Taiwan Army?
Yes 😊
@@Taiwan_Army 加油台湾
@@kondatck3899 ありがとう、日本、さあ。
These M-60s should stay in museum rather than Taiwan..
if it ain't broke, don't fix it
taiwan still has even older m41s' in service
這個黑煙 是要讓 中共知道你在哪裡嗎 幫幫忙 比搬家公司還累
黑煙😅戰車
訓練沒素的樣子
都是葷
这是要熏死敌人吗？
對岸的淪陷區給狗幹
@@boss12101031 没水准的回击～
@@jamesycj1 水準？連M60A3都不知道為什麼會有黑煙都不知道還說要暈死人，對啦，你猜對了，就是熏死你這韭菜
@@boss12101031 知不知道冒黑烟跟熏死有任何的关联吗？我知道子弹怎么射出去的就可以不被枪打死吗？不懂🐸的逻辑～😂
火燒車啊
有年閱兵
把府前搞得烏煙瘴氣
防衛には装甲兵器は必要だな、中国は大陸から離れた戦闘だから大量には輸送出来ないからな、
ㄧ上板台後面輪胎整個被壓扁一半
45噸的拖60噸😁😁
已經快被汰換的戰車，都還須要這麼多的軍隊人員協助上車。我還能期待軍隊在戰爭時有戰力嗎？
戰時的開法跟平常運送裝備的開法當然不一樣。
運輸時裝備需要精準定位固定。戰時又不用。
美軍那麼強戰車上板車也是要人家指揮啊！
又不是小台汽車停歪了輪子喬一下就好。
これって台湾？
そうです
兩光車，大陸直接尋煙打擊
黑煙冒成這樣…..戰車還沒開到就先被敵人幹掉了
你排第一個
The whistles are annoying .
好爛的指揮跟戰駕！坦克是壞了還是被穿甲彈擊中了！才退伍幾年卻變成行動焚化爐，我想應該故障才後送
伴隨好男兒，ㄧ家三代成長的戰車，阿公開新車，爸爸開中古車，兒子開代料驗車不過車，好在，美國的爸爸中古翻新M1車要來了。。。。
The low-boy driver should not present
看到這黑煙，解放軍心就安了！🙄
大烏賊…哈哈哈
Hier der Darcho J. Pegasus Galaktica 7 Cyborg / Li Peng Cyborg - ic ne puknaja ebago samo vezba
這如果是貨車警方就來吵小了
老古董
幽默一下：爛裝甲部隊吧！空污吧！還環保愛地球喔？軍方的特權吧！不簡單了老古董級的方式展開對緯國的緬懷吧！純屬幽默。
都快报废了吧
It needs new Turbo's that why it blowing so much black smoke
加尿素阿
武器太过老旧，驾驶技术太拖沓
你的智商也很低
@@boss12101031 你说的话就说明你的智商低得没有底线
改造能力真的很差，看看人家以色列。
烏賊車