In the context of science, "The Merry Pranksters of Science" may refer to researchers who adopt unconventional methodologies, challenge orthodox theories, or explore controversial topics in their pursuit of knowledge. These scientists may be known for their innovative ideas, bold experiments, or willingness to push the boundaries of conventional scientific practice. While their approaches may sometimes be met with skepticism or resistance from the scientific establishment, they are often celebrated for their creativity, boldness, and willingness to explore new frontiers in science and discovery.
At 17:40 I really liked the emphasis on the history of the "human colony" lack of attention towards "cognitive development" as was done, for example, by piaget. I guess we are loosing great opportunities of intervention (for good and for evil???) in the way children are educated.
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
In the context of science, "The Merry Pranksters of Science" may refer to researchers who adopt unconventional methodologies, challenge orthodox theories, or explore controversial topics in their pursuit of knowledge. These scientists may be known for their innovative ideas, bold experiments, or willingness to push the boundaries of conventional scientific practice. While their approaches may sometimes be met with skepticism or resistance from the scientific establishment, they are often celebrated for their creativity, boldness, and willingness to explore new frontiers in science and discovery.
That was more brilliant, than you think.
At 17:40 I really liked the emphasis on the history of the "human colony" lack of attention towards "cognitive development" as was done, for example, by piaget. I guess we are loosing great opportunities of intervention (for good and for evil???) in the way children are educated.
Thank you Marvin really enjoyed
This audience is so enthused
Especially the lady with the lolly pop
Please mention when this talk was given, it's only polite.
According to the presentation's filename, it was probably on or around June 20, 2003.
Now i know where some ideas WEF are inplementing comes from.
The 500 mio part was dark... seriously wtf
What is everybody laughing at
his shirt
the argument about trees is dumb. overall the talk is great
Not the best rebuttal bud
@@Murphdogg4what more needs to be said? Don’t you know you can just say, “no, you’re dumb”, and any argument you had is completely irrelevant? 😉🤣🤣