parachutes are already proven technology, they must consider that part 100% to work as intended, but thats the point where everything can go wrong, never leave anything to chance at scenarios like this, a lot of factors can be included at the final stage of landing and how it will go, after all that spining, normal soyuz rocket dont spin like that before it opens parachutes
Did YOU or Any of those who have Replied to your stupid Remark actually Read The Captions on the Video !? ... .. Watch it again and PAUSE IT at 1:18 or 1:19 !!! ..... You can Start It at 1:15 with This Link ..... ruclips.net/video/6HK9G7feXEk/видео.html
All this hate makes me sick. Pretty nice actually, I was just wondering one thing though. In case of a rocket failure, e.g. an explosion that happens, is this system quick enough to detach from the main rocket and ensure safety?
Timothy Kramer The hate makes me sick as well. I do believe that the orbit motor has a mechanism that moves it to the side and away from the launch vehicle.
The solid rocket motors, derived from those on the Shuttle, were also redesigned in order to ensure an explosion would cause failure from the bottom. This spreads the hot debris cloud underneath rather than up toward the capsule. Combined with the capsule's program to avoid falling back into the trajectory of the rocket, risk is minimized.
That is the ENTIRE reason for this test. I am the lead on building the space capsule inside the rocket and once it hits sonic speed that's when the launch abort process will begin. The thinking behind that is if the launch abort system can operate under the most extreme conditions, it should never fail.
How come the Orion doesn't have to do a Max-Q Abort like the Space X Falcon 2 has to do? The rocket they showed is not likely able to do the speed of sound. Sounds like Nasa Prejudice forcing Space X to jump through hoops Boeing and the Orion doesn't have to get near. Not fare Nasa.
Ascent abort 2 will in fact test the abort system during Max-Q The boilerplate capsule will be boosted for about a minute and a solid motor does pack a lot of thrust so it will abort at about mach 1.3 which is the speed at which it will experience Max-Q
This was almost 2 years ago and the test is finally happening tomorrow. This isn’t even a hard project compared to the actual sls yet it took 2 years to get from this to here. Disgusting
Engineering takes time Just because it looks easy in an animation doesn't mean it's simple and fast They had to develop specific software and hardware for this mission and that takes time especially with a limited budget And they did all that while also conducting the test 5 months ahead of schedule That's pretty impressive
Mastercrap 42123 it’s a booster that’s been in use on middles for years and another booster that has been tested many times before plus a dummy Orion capsule. I wouldn’t be surprised if Mr. Beast could do this in 7 months
@@DavidNagy03ER You forgot relocating avionics to the first stage, developing a robust aeroshell that can survive supersonic flight, calculating ballast amounts and location, developing the thrust structure that distributes thrust across Orion, and most importantly that this wasn't on the critical path so it wasn't a top priority.
Why are there no parachutes at the end ? Aren't the parachutes amongst the most critical parts of the whole mission, which should be tested as often as possible ?!
Obviously there would be parachutes in a real abort, but why are they not including them in the tests ? I would not want to step into a capsule which has untested parachutes.
they already have data on the parachutes. this is a good chance to get data on what the capsule can take by going beyond its calculated capabilities and seeing just how badly damaged it gets.
They already tested those successfully in the first Orion test flight. Doing it now in another test would only drive up the expenses. From mere visuals in this video I suppose instead of an actual Orion they will be using a boilerplate craft or even only ballast which will just crash into the ocean after the test.
dear nasa pls focus resources on interplanetary and lunar travel, not on transport to orbit. SpaceX and other rocket makers have ground to orbit covered just fine.
SpaceX simply has not the capability to launch a large spacecraft like Orion at this point in time. SLS will be about twice as powerful than even Falcon Heavy. Sure, eventually private companies can cover that part easily, but that's still long years away.
The current NASA plans are to explore the moon, and then mars while spacex , other private space agencies, and smaller countries would handel low earth orbit
Eu tenho uma fascinação enorme pela astronomia pelas galáxia,planetas, Estelares é tudo que existe no espaço meu senho desde pequena é poder sair da terra é ir até marte ,até a lua,até Júpiter,mercúrio, Vênus é a qualquer um dos planetas que habitam nossa galáxia queria um dia poder realizar meu sonho é eu vou conseguir um dia eu sei que vou
SpaceX had a pad abort test, no in flight abort test (that comes after DM-1). There's already been an Orion LAS pad abort test (before SpaceX, I may add)
Primitive invention but it has potentional. Hopefully we never get to see it being used in reality, better focus on that everything to be perfect. There is no need for errors, not at this age, we can do it! Space industry is right around the corner, we just need to push in the right direction. No more dreams of future, lets live it now. Lets make changes equally for all, for all humans to enjoy and prosper in the new age of technology.
The parchutes are not on the test capsule because of the uneeded cost of adding them on The parchutes for Orion have been tested seperately dozens of times by now so there isn't really a need to put them on this mission
"I saw worse crimes committed by Americans in the Iraq war after 9/11, is President Bush in Prison for war crimes? And shaking hands with Prime Minister Johnson should punished by death! (By Heaven of course)!" May God save the humans left after Armageddon!" - Jesimiel Millar Fernåndez - 53
NASA is so far behind they have to make CG tests just to show people they're doing something. Can't we just give the NASA budget to SpaceX? We'd get a lot more progress a lot faster and only a few hundred 70 year old men would have to retire early from their cushy jobs.
Be respectful to elders, especially, when they are aerospace engineers. They know more about their job, than you can even imagine. SpaceX isn't that genius as it seems. It has it's failures and God knows, how it will all turn out. Aerospace is blood and sweat of engineers, and you can't get good enough in it in few decades.
2 Different Divisions Of The Industry !!! What Is N.A.S.A. ? ..... www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/what-is-nasa-k4.html What Is SpaceX ? ..... You might need to read more than one of these Links to fully comprehend the difference between N.A.S.A. and SpaceX !!! ..... www.google.com.au/search?q=what+is+spacex&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwibwcvppcjXAhXBppQKHRJRCJQQ1QIIpgEoBA&biw=1366&bih=637
Don’t put so much faith in spacex, while they are a thriving company they are still unproven and their plan to get to mars is incredibly aggressive and sure to be delayed. NASA, which has been around since the 60s has proven itself as a reliable space agency
We've tested with Pad abort 1 already, you can watch it on youtube, it ain't CGI... This is the new design for the motor. Space X has not had a in flight abort test. They are FAR behind in this respect. The Space X entire system has 120000 lb thrust and pulls only 4.5 G. This pulls over 10 G with over 400,000 lb thrust... Not even in the same league.
Almost felt as if I was back on, Steam playing Kerbal space program.
Tttbn ... ģè.
This is clearly filmed in Kerbal Space Program.
i made this is kerbal space program
@@gsu12797you did not make this
Excited for this. My designs will be tested in a real G load environment for the first time. Exciting!!!!
Seems like an incomplete test if they don't deploy parachutes.
parachutes are already proven technology, they must consider that part 100% to work as intended, but thats the point where everything can go wrong, never leave anything to chance at scenarios like this, a lot of factors can be included at the final stage of landing and how it will go, after all that spining, normal soyuz rocket dont spin like that before it opens parachutes
Matthew Geer i think its just weight. Having done more tests is more economical.
Did YOU or Any of those who have Replied to your stupid Remark actually Read The Captions on the Video !? ...
.. Watch it again and PAUSE IT at 1:18 or 1:19 !!! ..... You can Start It at 1:15 with This Link ..... ruclips.net/video/6HK9G7feXEk/видео.html
This test is for the launch abort system redesign, not for the capsule. They already proved that in pad abort 1.
Orion's parachutes have been already tested multiple times
Definitely play this music in the crew module.
shout out to ppl here before the AA2 in July 2019
Hey NASA this isn't KSP! You can't forget the parachute.
Watch the news. Be informed.
1:18
I was joking!
Imagine how big the actual rocket will be in 2024-2028
All this hate makes me sick.
Pretty nice actually, I was just wondering one thing though. In case of a rocket failure, e.g. an explosion that happens, is this system quick enough to detach from the main rocket and ensure safety?
Timothy Kramer The hate makes me sick as well. I do believe that the orbit motor has a mechanism that moves it to the side and away from the launch vehicle.
The solid rocket motors, derived from those on the Shuttle, were also redesigned in order to ensure an explosion would cause failure from the bottom. This spreads the hot debris cloud underneath rather than up toward the capsule. Combined with the capsule's program to avoid falling back into the trajectory of the rocket, risk is minimized.
Yes it's quick enough - that's the point of the whole system. Actual test of the real thing will be happening next month.
Nice kerbal space program 2 leaks
I think this is filmed in Kemble space program!
Forgot the parachute ? is this KSP ?
Watch the news. Be informed.
Blender mantaflow or blender or Maya or 3ds max or hoidini or embergen(favorite software) or kerbal space program mods, which one?
Ed i 4 oara cadute ?
I want to know if launch abort can be done during maximum aerodynamic pressure.
That is the ENTIRE reason for this test. I am the lead on building the space capsule inside the rocket and once it hits sonic speed that's when the launch abort process will begin. The thinking behind that is if the launch abort system can operate under the most extreme conditions, it should never fail.
Испытания САС проводились на компьютерной симуляции? Очень продуктивно!
يلي عم يطبق المقاطع على الحاسوب قليل خبرة إذا بدكن بسويلكون أفضل من هيك بورجيكون كيف رواد الفضاء الوهمي عم يهبطو على المريخ بخبرة ممتازة
Add the damn parachutes and recover the CM like how the Apollo guys did it with Little Joe II.
Tell me it's not like you are showing animations because you don't have enough funding for real tests...
Dart Frog they will start the test on April 2019
Dart Frog *Enough **Funding
Is english your second language, are you very young, or has our education system failed entirely in the decade I've been out of it?
sry I'm typing with swipe keyboard option and forgot to switch keyboard language, didn't notice the mistakes
Atlas WalkedAway and also yes, english is not my native language
Is that a ps4 game or Xbox.
Мы все хотим побывать на Луне!!!
The G force must really freakin high
Can't say anything about orion, but the g-force during launch abort on the russian sojus is about 14-17G.
So you're right.
Wow it looks so real
Better a year and a half late than never I guess NASA
How come the Orion doesn't have to do a Max-Q Abort like the Space X Falcon 2 has to do? The rocket they showed is not likely able to do the speed of sound. Sounds like Nasa Prejudice forcing Space X to jump through hoops Boeing and the Orion doesn't have to get near. Not fare Nasa.
Ascent abort 2 will in fact test the abort system during Max-Q
The boilerplate capsule will be boosted for about a minute and a solid motor does pack a lot of thrust so it will abort at about mach 1.3 which is the speed at which it will experience Max-Q
@@brokensoap1717 Small note, this wasn't actually at Max Q but at a point between Max Drag and Max Q
@@AmbientMorality Thanks for clearing that up
This was almost 2 years ago and the test is finally happening tomorrow. This isn’t even a hard project compared to the actual sls yet it took 2 years to get from this to here. Disgusting
Engineering takes time
Just because it looks easy in an animation doesn't mean it's simple and fast
They had to develop specific software and hardware for this mission and that takes time especially with a limited budget
And they did all that while also conducting the test 5 months ahead of schedule
That's pretty impressive
Mastercrap 42123 it’s a booster that’s been in use on middles for years and another booster that has been tested many times before plus a dummy Orion capsule. I wouldn’t be surprised if Mr. Beast could do this in 7 months
@@DavidNagy03ER You forgot relocating avionics to the first stage, developing a robust aeroshell that can survive supersonic flight, calculating ballast amounts and location, developing the thrust structure that distributes thrust across Orion, and most importantly that this wasn't on the critical path so it wasn't a top priority.
little Joe 3. its been a long time!
what are the training that is used to go to space
April 2019!??
right around the corner!
Is this still on that schedule?
Why are there no parachutes at the end ?
Aren't the parachutes amongst the most critical parts of the whole mission, which should be tested as often as possible ?!
it says right in the video in a real-life abort there would be parachutes.
Obviously there would be parachutes in a real abort, but why are they not including them in the tests ?
I would not want to step into a capsule which has untested parachutes.
it's a boiler plate if this were the real Orion they would blow the chutes. boiler plates can survive impact and are disposable.
they already have data on the parachutes. this is a good chance to get data on what the capsule can take by going beyond its calculated capabilities and seeing just how badly damaged it gets.
Why didn't they test the parachutes? Troubling.
They already tested those successfully in the first Orion test flight. Doing it now in another test would only drive up the expenses. From mere visuals in this video I suppose instead of an actual Orion they will be using a boilerplate craft or even only ballast which will just crash into the ocean after the test.
I saw the thumbnail I though it was Kerabal space program LOL
can you tell me how space shuttle is made
what happened when asteoroid belt is not there
For additional information: www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/aa2_fact_sheet.pdf
Система САС на советских ракетах устанавливается уже пол века, ничего нового
we not living in the ISS because space has no borders
This is almost sad to watch.
DPRK?
dear nasa pls focus resources on interplanetary and lunar travel, not on transport to orbit. SpaceX and other rocket makers have ground to orbit covered just fine.
SpaceX simply has not the capability to launch a large spacecraft like Orion at this point in time. SLS will be about twice as powerful than even Falcon Heavy.
Sure, eventually private companies can cover that part easily, but that's still long years away.
The current NASA plans are to explore the moon, and then mars while spacex , other private space agencies, and smaller countries would handel low earth orbit
Looks like a little kerbal rocket
i was thinking it was on kerbal space program when i started the video
I want to ride on it
What is the stupid annoying "Oh so dramatic" music needed for?
مرينا من هنا
NASA employees more graphic artist than scientist...
Looks like ksp
Wow
Aren't we supposed to have an actual unmanned flight to the moon by 2019?
Has been delayed (as usual) to 2020...
They should just put "in 3 years" on their website so they don't have to keep changing it
Go SpaceX!
Eu tenho uma fascinação enorme pela astronomia pelas galáxia,planetas, Estelares é tudo que existe no espaço meu senho desde pequena é poder sair da terra é ir até marte ,até a lua,até Júpiter,mercúrio, Vênus é a qualquer um dos planetas que habitam nossa galáxia queria um dia poder realizar meu sonho é eu vou conseguir um dia eu sei que vou
Meanwhile SpaceX movie is actual footage not an animation and that was 18 months ago. NASA just focus on the missions not the rocket.
The test is in 2019... They just animated it to show what's meant to happen...
SpaceX had a pad abort test, no in flight abort test (that comes after DM-1). There's already been an Orion LAS pad abort test (before SpaceX, I may add)
💙👍💪👍💙
What ever. Lets see a car get more gas mileage and the prices go down
Primitive invention but it has potentional.
Hopefully we never get to see it being used in reality, better focus on that everything to be perfect.
There is no need for errors, not at this age, we can do it!
Space industry is right around the corner, we just need to push in the right direction.
No more dreams of future, lets live it now.
Lets make changes equally for all, for all humans to enjoy and prosper in the new age of technology.
F357
LOL
X
Heh, cartoon...
So basically you will waste a capsule by not bothering with parachutes. Very cost effective, nice one guys
The parchutes are not on the test capsule because of the uneeded cost of adding them on
The parchutes for Orion have been tested seperately dozens of times by now so there isn't really a need to put them on this mission
It's not a capsule, it's a boilerplate.
วนัส
Илончик вже полетыв)))))))))))))))))))))
Test was failed since you cannot see the actual landing... hahahah
alien is real and not
"I saw worse crimes committed by Americans in the Iraq war after 9/11, is President Bush in Prison for war crimes? And shaking hands with Prime Minister Johnson should punished by death! (By Heaven of course)!" May God save the humans left after Armageddon!"
- Jesimiel Millar Fernåndez
- 53
NASA is so far behind they have to make CG tests just to show people they're doing something. Can't we just give the NASA budget to SpaceX? We'd get a lot more progress a lot faster and only a few hundred 70 year old men would have to retire early from their cushy jobs.
Be respectful to elders, especially, when they are aerospace engineers. They know more about their job, than you can even imagine. SpaceX isn't that genius as it seems. It has it's failures and God knows, how it will all turn out. Aerospace is blood and sweat of engineers, and you can't get good enough in it in few decades.
SpaceX gets plenty of money from .gov.
2 Different Divisions Of The Industry !!!
What Is N.A.S.A. ? ..... www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/what-is-nasa-k4.html
What Is SpaceX ? ..... You might need to read more than one of these Links to fully comprehend the difference between N.A.S.A. and SpaceX !!! ..... www.google.com.au/search?q=what+is+spacex&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwibwcvppcjXAhXBppQKHRJRCJQQ1QIIpgEoBA&biw=1366&bih=637
Don’t put so much faith in spacex, while they are a thriving company they are still unproven and their plan to get to mars is incredibly aggressive and sure to be delayed. NASA, which has been around since the 60s has proven itself as a reliable space agency
We've tested with Pad abort 1 already, you can watch it on youtube, it ain't CGI... This is the new design for the motor. Space X has not had a in flight abort test. They are FAR behind in this respect. The Space X entire system has 120000 lb thrust and pulls only 4.5 G. This pulls over 10 G with over 400,000 lb thrust... Not even in the same league.
$50 million a day budget for your CGI nonsense
Russian technology ...😂😂😂
What are you talking about????