It doesn’t allow criticism or arguments. All theories, whether they are evolution, scientific, philosophical or politicians, it’s all challenged. The only types of ideologies or theories that don’t allow them to be confronted are totalitarian. Totalitarianism demands total obedience; never question or criticize.
It does allow criticism? Just because it itself is critical of society doesn't mean it's unfalsifiable, nor that it is designed to not tolerate critique.
You need to look deeper. People don't do or believe things for no reason. Most likely they aren't crazy or evil. They may just be working with vastly different life experiences that has caused them to see the world in what seems skewed to others. If we look at the world through their eyes, we can understand and more importantly, have a chance at changing their minds.
It's a deliberate part of the theory's design, to divide. Critical theory's purpose is to break down unity so as to weaken any resistance to stand up to it.
It's a way to view racism that is critical of current systems. It doesn't proclaim to be the one truth, nor to be science, nor does it "not tolerate criticism"
But CRT is History not science. History is the interpretation of events. People are not asked to be a jury, but to look at events and their consequences.
“we’d be living in the dark ages again” oh, somebody else sees it too. It’s not too hard to see how these steps combine now is it? You all still looking at the fireworks while we slip deeper into the quicksand.
This is the exact problem with Ibrahim Kendi and his call for "anti-racism". It is not enough to actively strive to not be racist. One must actively oppose "racism" the definition of which will,. conveniently change whenever people like Kendi decide.
Of course it's not enough to strive no not be racist. By your logic the British sending fleets to stop slavers was bad, and actually the slavers should've just stopped being racist. That's insane.
@@Mango_Eter that would explain my ignorance of the topic.. sooo not my principle in life, marxism critical theory, Marxist-inspired movement in social and political philosophy originally associated with the work of the Frankfurt School.
Actually that’s false. Critical Race Theory simply observes the behaviors of systems and of the people who create or operate within those systems. CRT is in and of itself completely data-driven and therefore by definition is neutral. Also it absolutely does not mean people cannot be neutral (as in objective). And in terms of being neutral as in “I don’t care one way or another about racism” then that’s the single largest contributor to the continuation of the racism problem itself.
It's a advanced college course. It's not taught in schools. Teaching about race and racial history is NOT CRT. People who don't want racial history taught have made this a hot button issue.
This lady is a nice lady. I like her. Nice person, very fair, very smart, very well educated. She is Jewish, like my niece is part Jewish. Her ethnic group does better than other white groups. By far. Let's assume for a minute that, based on economic evidence, comparing income and success levels, that white privilege is real. We must change that. Let's just say, if one groups succeeds more than another, the reason must be structural bigotry. We must change that. Then, is Jewish Privilege a real thing? Should we change that? How? What say you, Critical Race Theorists?
Critical theory has no predictive value either. You can't use it to make predictions about anything. It's also not falsifiable. In fact it's almost designed to be unfalsifiable. It's not just worthless, it's less than worthless as it prevents, or at least limits, any other ideas.
It’s a critical way of thinking about race relations within a western context. Nothing more, nothing less. So with this in mind, what kinds of people do you think would be opposed to this idea?
I've read Stefancic and Delgado's introductory text on CRT. It's not true that the theory is simply a critical way of thinking about race relations and nothing more. CRT clearly sets out a set of themes and specific theses within which context it asks us to think and act. The woman in this video is in fact responding to and criticizing a real feature of CRT. From the textbook: "Unlike some academic disciplines, critical race theory contains an activist dimension. It tries not only to understand our social situation but to change it..." (Delgado and Stefancic, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, p. 8). The moral situation is more complex than you imagine. The actions of those take CRT on without critically thinking about it are not actually designed to make things better for racial minorities. How do they know these ideas will be a benefit if they haven't even thought them through?
Critical Race Theory is a microcosm of a bigger more general phenomenon. Throughout history, when a change is proposed, there are those radically in favour of the change and those just as radically against it. Neutral positions are not permitted and if the change in question has the objective of correcting a problem, the change often over corrects and an opposite and opposing force gets awakened. A movement just as radical and fanatical in the opposite direction might arise. This has happened in Canada with Bilingualism, the Metric System Multi-culturalisme, tolerance for the LGBT ... . But as a simpler quieter example, two approaches for teaching kids to read are phonics and word recognition. Phonics was once banned from the educational system but brought back all within a 10-15 year span. Views on race politics in this case Critical Race Theory is just another one of these changes. It just happens to be controversial.
Follow the money. People are getting rich off spreading this vile nonsense. I don’t see this ship turning anytime soon,unfortunately. My only solace is that my daughter is 30 and was not indoctrinated into this during her time in school. And I’m 53, so maybe I won’t live to see the destruction of this once great country. I could never have imagined this current world
@@Mango_Etertrying to help black people through propaganda and elevating one race at the expense of another. Let everyone stand on their own merits. If they can’t stand then it’s on them.
@@betrayedcitizen5135 1. No propaganda on the left, it's the libs who do that. 2. The only cases of "a race being elevated" are confirmative action, and that only counters the bias created by institutional racism. 3. It's a bad harder to stand on your own when a policeman is shooting you.
CRT is merely a legal theory discussed and explored in some law schools. The notion that there is some kind of widespread dissemination of the theory as truth to young people or the general population is off the wall.
@Ser Aeggo Butterworth : …and exactly which grade school students or school teachers were exposed to CRT or the theoretical writings in the 1990s. The answer is none.
My question is how was this passed without anyone knowing about it? I know teachers that had no clue about this passing. That being said, pay them enough and they will teach it...
This is the actual definition of CRT -- which negates every argument she makes that it is polarizing. The only poliarization comes from those -- like her who reject the very idea that dominanat cultures have for hundreds of years strived to undermine subordinate cultures and maintain their members as second class citizens. () is a cross-disciplinary examination, by social and civil-rights scholars and activists, of how laws, social and political movements, and media shape, and are shaped by, social conceptions of race and ethnicity. Goals include challenging all mainstream and "alternative" views of racism and racial justice, including conservative, liberal and progressive. The word in the name is an academic reference to critical thinking, critical theory, and scholarly criticism, rather than criticizing or blaming people.
Yes, there is a dominant culture. It's the one that won the contest between all cultures and peoples, that has always occurred everywhere, and come out on top. If you are living in that culture while not being part of it for some reason, you can stay and make the best of what's available to you, you can leave and attempt to find a better place and culture somewhere, perhaps your own culture, or you can attempt to dismantle the dominant culture (you might say improve, others might say destroy) by employing all the methods of cultural Marxism that critical theory promotes while pretending to be morally superior and attacking others as morally inferior. Everyone will enjoy this undoubtedly. And then, for good measure, you get to rebuild an entire society from the ruins of the former, exactly as you want, with all new ideas and methods, and engineer a perfectly working utopia, the first true example of socialism.
You know you are on the right track when those who oppose you start on about cultural Marxism Now is you want to put something in the trash, "cultural Marxism" as a concept would be most fitting. Only those with extreme bias could name a supposed social phenomenon after an unpopular economic analysis. It's interesting that this critical post also admits to it's truth in his first paragraph, but downplays it because it happens in all societies.
@seraeggobutterworth5247hat was my confussion with these people.. critical thinking.. ISN'T.. thinking critically.. thats their confusion.. beliving they are one & the same.. critical thinking.. is.. looking at the extreme opposites to find what is.. the middle ground.. the average of possible.. its NOT about being critical persae
CRT obviates the need for any thought, word or act of racism as proof of their presumed verdict. All they need is their preferred race measuring less favorably than another. Regardless of the cause: they declare their favored race to be victims of the other. Then they would use real government enforced discrimination in response to their presumed discrimination; altering laws, policies and practices to favor their preferred race. All for the stated purpose of forcibly making the measurements between races identical. The operative question is whether you support using government force to implement racial discrimination. All the rest is academic. My answer is no.
The biggest problem is that it’s an indiscriminate paradigm. You can for anything into it. As such it tells you nothing as it’s an precognitive unfalsifiable epistemological framework. It’s a faith.
What’s a little wack to me is she is talking about a college level course. Now I’ve never taken a course in critical theory . Most people won't have. But I read a serious article. But according to the paper I read oh from Stanford university. Critical must be explanatory, practical, and normative, all at the same time. That is, it must explain what is wrong with current social reality, identify the actors to change it, and provide both clear norms for criticism and achievable practical goals for social transformation. As people have grow into adults they have ideas about what would be a good social change. People got together and decided it would be better to get the vote if they didn’t have it. So the actor for change would be women and those they could motivate to come along with them and bring about that change. They would have to appeal To the positives of having the boat and the negatives I’m not having a vote. That’s what it means to be normative. You’re making moral and practical arguments In hopes of Bringing about the vote. And what are achievable practical goals to making ‘the vote’ come about. To make the school come about you may have different approaches. You may go directly to try and change the law. Or you may feel you need to create grassroots support in order for a bill to be voted on which may take many years can I have some sort of a strategy. Critical theory is for grown-ups . It’s providing the students with an orderly practical problem-solving approach. Which is what I any college course should do. So people can become something or perform a task. It’s no more scary and then grown-up students reading different schools of philosophy or psychology. I’m not really a person who sticks their neck out for any causes but I am fully aware that it’s a healthy thing for people to seek out social change and let society ultimately make decisions about whether they agree with that particular change. But for grown ups To be afraid of being exposed do an approach or philosophy or way of thinking is off base.
And that's the point. Remove tbe capacity for discourse, readonable discussion, impartiality. It's intended to take us into dark ages and the illimination of reason.
Supposing that things need to change employees at there something wrong with what is going on. Maybe some things are working just fine, like a mommy and a daddy, doing Mommy and Daddy things, running a household with children.
@@JoBlakeLisbon hello Jordan Peterson worshipper! Have you ever considered that showing somebody the consequences of what they say and asking if they really mean it, rather than immediately claiming that they do, is a normal and respectful way to critique what others say?
This is the separation of sheep and goats prophecy in the Bible. We will all choose a side. It will be your choice. This is the Good vs Evil you have known about, all your life. One way leads to eternal life with the Creator, the other way leads to eternity with all those who reject the Creator. Through the Blood of Jesus, is the only way to Heaven. Confess your sins and be forgiven. Repent and be baptized, everyone of you and receive the Gift of The Holy Spirit. Be transformed by the renewing of your mind through the living and active Word of God. I chose this path 23 years ago, and have NEVER regretted my choice. God is alive and well, and He reveals Himself to all who earnestly seek Him. Why not test this Promise? Goodness and Mercy awaits.
Theory's are just that , a theory and it demands the same proof of evidence as the generally approved beliefs? Theory of relativity? Believe it or not.✌️
Lies. The positivist attitude is very useful to higher economic classes. These calls for impartiality are nothing but excuse for conservatism. This journalist holds burgeois values, she is definitely more privileged than for example an African American lesbian woman who will be encountering a lot more negativity, pressure and bullying in her life. Critical theory is important because it challenges any kind of injustice brought about in an economic system based on inequality. You cannot approach the tough situation of black people in America or other westerb countries, for example, with this impartiality BS. People suffer, they're more likely to be beaten up or killed by police, and this person calls for some impartiality when studying these injustices? This is nothing but an excuse for keeping things as they are today... for the interest of capitalists, those with big economic power, and corporations. Racism, sexism and other types of discrimination are their tool, and critical approach to them undermines their influence. They're worried, so they send out messages like this.
Your premise is wrong. It hasn't been taken up by a great portion of academia. Therefore your conclusions are wrong. It is what it is, a right wing talking point.
In some areas CRT ( which is racist ) is dominant as any one who speaks out against the CRT fraud is attacked in the methods outlined in CRT theory training . CRT was required training at where I work and as I cannot make myself lie I was not able to complete the automated training and when I tried to take the issues up the chain of command my too boss admitted to making CRT training mandatory as he used to be a professor who taught it in his sociology class . CRT is designed to cause a psychosis like manipulation to divide populations against those who would detect and oppose the destructive frauds of Maoism or Marxism .
@@alt3241 “anyone who speaks out is attacked” How so? Are their critiques analyzed and dismantled? Because so many of the critiques are based off a poor understanding of the concept? Or do you have actual examples of people with valid criticisms being “attacked”?
So the fact that it's full of lies and is designed to destroy the structure we have doesn't bother you that much just the unfairness what I hate evil I just realized I want you to hate evil too
Impartiality ? If she can't recognise that she's coming from the stand point of a white middle class woman of colonial heritage then she'll never understand that she can't be neutral. The idea of impartiality is flawed and is generally taken as the received establishment view
It doesn’t allow criticism or arguments. All theories, whether they are evolution, scientific, philosophical or politicians, it’s all challenged. The only types of ideologies or theories that don’t allow them to be confronted are totalitarian. Totalitarianism demands total obedience; never question or criticize.
It does allow criticism? Just because it itself is critical of society doesn't mean it's unfalsifiable, nor that it is designed to not tolerate critique.
I view it like postmodernism. It's a methodology to destroy truth by arguing all exceptions prove nothing is true.
I understand people who are unreasonable, they're either crazy or evil or both. What scares me are those who want to reason with the unreasonable.
You need to look deeper. People don't do or believe things for no reason. Most likely they aren't crazy or evil. They may just be working with vastly different life experiences that has caused them to see the world in what seems skewed to others. If we look at the world through their eyes, we can understand and more importantly, have a chance at changing their minds.
It's a deliberate part of the theory's design, to divide. Critical theory's purpose is to break down unity so as to weaken any resistance to stand up to it.
You know a theory is absolute nonsense when it’s proponents need to change the definition of words to make it sound remotely coherent
The impartiality is implied in the tone with which its adherents talk. It's a confidence trick.
Ah yes, the holier than thous
Clare Lehman is brilliant and a very important player in the social political landscape
Science should ALWAYS be impartial!
It's a way to view racism that is critical of current systems. It doesn't proclaim to be the one truth, nor to be science, nor does it "not tolerate criticism"
But CRT is History not science. History is the interpretation of events. People are not asked to be a jury, but to look at events and their consequences.
She's spoken beautifully
Right on point.
She has a good point. I think it could be worse than the Dark age.
Do not be afraid, fight back fiercely!
They don’t understand what is eventually going to happen, if they keep prodding those of us who simply want to be left alone…
“we’d be living in the dark ages again”
oh, somebody else sees it too. It’s not too hard to see how these steps combine now is it? You all still looking at the fireworks while we slip deeper into the quicksand.
That is an excellent point of view.
This is the exact problem with Ibrahim Kendi and his call for "anti-racism". It is not enough to actively strive to not be racist. One must actively oppose "racism" the definition of which will,. conveniently change whenever people like Kendi decide.
Of course it's not enough to strive no not be racist. By your logic the British sending fleets to stop slavers was bad, and actually the slavers should've just stopped being racist. That's insane.
@@Mango_Eter You've missed the point. Totally.
@@virginiakagkou3295 no I haven't. Not stopping slavers is helping slavery, not stopping racists is helping racism.
@@WinstonSmithGPT if you can't name my lie or give a logical reason for your comment, you shouldn't say anything
@@Mango_Eter what are you doing to stop modern day slavery in the Congo?
Critical theory is the means by which they will build the collective. One day, those views will be the ONLY views allowed.
One day?
Excellent. Thank you.
This was such an amazingly good point I hadn’t heard before
It's not true though.
@@Mango_Eterwtf IS.. "critical".. "theory" !!!!!?
@@Errol.C-nz critical theory is a theory that is critical? like bro just look it up
@@Mango_Eter that would explain my ignorance of the topic.. sooo not my principle in life, marxism
critical theory, Marxist-inspired movement in social and political philosophy originally associated with the work of the Frankfurt School.
Great point. Essential. Thank you.
Actually that’s false. Critical Race Theory simply observes the behaviors of systems and of the people who create or operate within those systems. CRT is in and of itself completely data-driven and therefore by definition is neutral.
Also it absolutely does not mean people cannot be neutral (as in objective).
And in terms of being neutral as in “I don’t care one way or another about racism” then that’s the single largest contributor to the continuation of the racism problem itself.
Apathy maintains the status quo, allowing the enjoyment of privilege without any of the responsibilities.
Neutrality, like centrism, is another word for cowardice.
It's a advanced college course. It's not taught in schools. Teaching about race and racial history is NOT CRT. People who don't want racial history taught have made this a hot button issue.
Dwelling upon negatives creates a dark future
This lady is a nice lady. I like her. Nice person, very fair, very smart, very well educated. She is Jewish, like my niece is part Jewish. Her ethnic group does better than other white groups. By far. Let's assume for a minute that, based on economic evidence, comparing income and success levels, that white privilege is real. We must change that. Let's just say, if one groups succeeds more than another, the reason must be structural bigotry. We must change that. Then, is Jewish Privilege a real thing? Should we change that? How? What say you, Critical Race Theorists?
Well said. Shared.
Theres no middle ground when two sides are debating on who deserves basic human rights.
Thank you for sharing this 🙏 literaly what I've experienced in university
Critical theory has no predictive value either. You can't use it to make predictions about anything. It's also not falsifiable. In fact it's almost designed to be unfalsifiable. It's not just worthless, it's less than worthless as it prevents, or at least limits, any other ideas.
Brilliant explanation!!!
It’s a critical way of thinking about race relations within a western context. Nothing more, nothing less. So with this in mind, what kinds of people do you think would be opposed to this idea?
Telling a white child that they were born racist is "thinking critically"?
I've read Stefancic and Delgado's introductory text on CRT. It's not true that the theory is simply a critical way of thinking about race relations and nothing more. CRT clearly sets out a set of themes and specific theses within which context it asks us to think and act. The woman in this video is in fact responding to and criticizing a real feature of CRT. From the textbook: "Unlike some academic disciplines, critical race theory contains an activist dimension. It tries not only to understand our social situation but to change it..." (Delgado and Stefancic, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, p. 8). The moral situation is more complex than you imagine. The actions of those take CRT on without critically thinking about it are not actually designed to make things better for racial minorities. How do they know these ideas will be a benefit if they haven't even thought them through?
CRT the invention of the best devil.
Wise wise woman, you Anderson a treasure
Victimhood refusing to DIE !
The operative word is it is a THEORY.
Critical Race Theory is a microcosm of a bigger more general phenomenon.
Throughout history, when a change is proposed, there are those radically in favour of the change and those just as radically against it.
Neutral positions are not permitted and if the change in question has the objective of correcting a problem, the change often over corrects and an opposite and opposing force gets awakened. A movement just as radical and fanatical in the opposite direction might arise.
This has happened in Canada with Bilingualism, the Metric System Multi-culturalisme, tolerance for the LGBT ... .
But as a simpler quieter example, two approaches for teaching kids to read are phonics and word recognition. Phonics was once banned from the educational system but brought back all within a 10-15 year span.
Views on race politics in this case Critical Race Theory is just another one of these changes. It just happens to be controversial.
According to critical theory, objectivity is a myth. Think about the implicaitons of that...
if someone tries to do this to you, why not default to no?
Silence is violence apparently
Follow the money. People are getting rich off spreading this vile nonsense. I don’t see this ship turning anytime soon,unfortunately. My only solace is that my daughter is 30 and was not indoctrinated into this during her time in school. And I’m 53, so maybe I won’t live to see the destruction of this once great country. I could never have imagined this current world
Lefties: *try to help black people*
Boomers: "THEY'RE DESTROYING THE COUNTRY!"
@@Mango_Etertrying to help black people through propaganda and elevating one race at the expense of another. Let everyone stand on their own merits. If they can’t stand then it’s on them.
@@betrayedcitizen5135 1. No propaganda on the left, it's the libs who do that.
2. The only cases of "a race being elevated" are confirmative action, and that only counters the bias created by institutional racism.
3. It's a bad harder to stand on your own when a policeman is shooting you.
CRT is merely a legal theory discussed and explored in some law schools. The notion that there is some kind of widespread dissemination of the theory as truth to young people or the general population is off the wall.
@Ser Aeggo Butterworth : …and exactly which grade school students or school teachers were exposed to CRT or the theoretical writings in the 1990s. The answer is none.
@@michaelberkman5015 you're either a pod person or someone that doesn't believe pod people exist - ' invasion of the body snatchers'
My question is how was this passed without anyone knowing about it? I know teachers that had no clue about this passing. That being said, pay them enough and they will teach it...
This is the actual definition of CRT -- which negates every argument she makes that it is polarizing. The only poliarization comes from those -- like her who reject the very idea that dominanat cultures have for hundreds of years strived to undermine subordinate cultures and maintain their members as second class citizens.
() is a cross-disciplinary examination, by social and civil-rights scholars and activists, of how laws, social and political movements, and media shape, and are shaped by, social conceptions of race and ethnicity. Goals include challenging all mainstream and "alternative" views of racism and racial justice, including conservative, liberal and progressive. The word in the name is an academic reference to critical thinking, critical theory, and scholarly criticism, rather than criticizing or blaming people.
Yes, there is a dominant culture. It's the one that won the contest between all cultures and peoples, that has always occurred everywhere, and come out on top. If you are living in that culture while not being part of it for some reason, you can stay and make the best of what's available to you, you can leave and attempt to find a better place and culture somewhere, perhaps your own culture, or you can attempt to dismantle the dominant culture (you might say improve, others might say destroy) by employing all the methods of cultural Marxism that critical theory promotes while pretending to be morally superior and attacking others as morally inferior. Everyone will enjoy this undoubtedly. And then, for good measure, you get to rebuild an entire society from the ruins of the former, exactly as you want, with all new ideas and methods, and engineer a perfectly working utopia, the first true example of socialism.
You know you are on the right track when those who oppose you start on about cultural Marxism
Now is you want to put something in the trash, "cultural Marxism" as a concept would be most fitting.
Only those with extreme bias could name a supposed social phenomenon after an unpopular economic analysis.
It's interesting that this critical post also admits to it's truth in his first paragraph, but downplays it because it happens in all societies.
@@light9999
What contest ?
At the cost of millions of lives .
@seraeggobutterworth5247hat was my confussion with these people.. critical thinking.. ISN'T.. thinking critically.. thats their confusion.. beliving they are one & the same.. critical thinking.. is.. looking at the extreme opposites to find what is.. the middle ground.. the average of possible.. its NOT about being critical persae
Your either with us or against us
"only sith deal in absolutes"
We should all be taught all of history. What's neutral about history? You all won't die if you learn history. Geez.
She is beautiful ❤️
CRT obviates the need for any thought, word or act of racism as proof of their presumed verdict. All they need is their preferred race measuring less favorably than another. Regardless of the cause: they declare their favored race to be victims of the other.
Then they would use real government enforced discrimination in response to their presumed discrimination; altering laws, policies and practices to favor their preferred race.
All for the stated purpose of forcibly making the measurements between races identical.
The operative question is whether you support using government force to implement racial discrimination.
All the rest is academic.
My answer is no.
Marxism
What's Marxism
@@brcm542 that workers, not rich people, should run the factories and other work places
@@zachb.6179 I'm asking Susan, some people say words and dont know meaning.
People are getting very rich creating this devision,while they smash the world. Who is(wef)???
The biggest problem is that it’s an indiscriminate paradigm. You can for anything into it. As such it tells you nothing as it’s an precognitive unfalsifiable epistemological framework. It’s a faith.
What’s a little wack to me is she is talking about a college level course. Now I’ve never taken a course in critical theory . Most people won't have. But I read a serious article.
But according to the paper I read oh from Stanford university.
Critical must be explanatory, practical, and normative, all at the same time. That is, it must explain what is wrong with current social reality, identify the actors to change it, and provide both clear norms for criticism and achievable practical goals for social transformation. As people have grow into adults they have ideas about what would be a good social change. People got together and decided it would be better to get the vote if they didn’t have it. So the actor for change would be women and those they could motivate to come along with them and bring about that change. They would have to appeal To the positives of having the boat and the negatives I’m not having a vote. That’s what it means to be normative. You’re making moral and practical arguments In hopes of Bringing about the vote. And what are achievable practical goals to making ‘the vote’ come about. To make the school come about you may have different approaches. You may go directly to try and change the law. Or you may feel you need to create grassroots support in order for a bill to be voted on which may take many years can I have some sort of a strategy. Critical theory is for grown-ups . It’s providing the students with an orderly practical problem-solving approach. Which is what I any college course should do. So people can become something or perform a task. It’s no more scary and then grown-up students reading different schools of philosophy or psychology. I’m not really a person who sticks their neck out for any causes but I am fully aware that it’s a healthy thing for people to seek out social change and let society ultimately make decisions about whether they agree with that particular change. But for grown ups To be afraid of being exposed do an approach or philosophy or way of thinking is off base.
Only the Sith deal in absolutes. 🎉
Yep
And that's the point. Remove tbe capacity for discourse, readonable discussion, impartiality.
It's intended to take us into dark ages and the illimination of reason.
It’s comical to me that people don’t even know what critical theory means and yet they are agreeing or disagreeing with what they saying.
Right? This woman is acting like CRT is some widespread dogma, but most people hadn't even heard of it before the conservatives started freaking out.
Most people know what critical race theory is at this stage.
Supposing that things need to change employees at there something wrong with what is going on. Maybe some things are working just fine, like a mommy and a daddy, doing Mommy and Daddy things, running a household with children.
So what you're saying is that criticism isn't allowed? Critical race theory frightens you because they dislike the status quo? That makes no sense.
'So what you're saying is....'
Are you related to Kathy Newman
@@JoBlakeLisbon hello Jordan Peterson worshipper! Have you ever considered that showing somebody the consequences of what they say and asking if they really mean it, rather than immediately claiming that they do, is a normal and respectful way to critique what others say?
This is the separation of sheep and goats prophecy in the Bible. We will all choose a side. It will be your choice. This is the Good vs Evil you have known about, all your life. One way leads to eternal life with the Creator, the other way leads to eternity with all those who reject the Creator. Through the Blood of Jesus, is the only way to Heaven. Confess your sins and be forgiven. Repent and be baptized, everyone of you and receive the Gift of The Holy Spirit. Be transformed by the renewing of your mind through the living and active Word of God.
I chose this path 23 years ago, and have NEVER regretted my choice.
God is alive and well, and He reveals Himself to all who earnestly seek Him.
Why not test this Promise? Goodness and Mercy awaits.
Fascist believed the political is the self
Critical theory believed the political is the self
Acquiescence to orthodoxy is not “neutrality”.
You sound like a bot - you must be a university student
It's a religious belief, Marxism.
Crazy Scary Stuff
Critical theory your critical race theory? What other schools of critical theory are there? That could be useful to me.
Fabian Socialism at its finest. Vipers.
Completely negates her own argument by totally misrepresenting CRT. The BS is strong in this one.
Impartial. A child is running into the road with a car oncoming clearly in danger. So, what sort of person is impartial in this situation.
Dumb analogy.
There are loads of issues on which you can be neutral. Your placing an extreme situation as a way of caricaturing the woman's statement.
critical theory needs criticism.
Critical theory is all about dismantling Western culture and capitalism. That's the objective.
No it’s not. Smh
This Claire? Love her bathing suit pics
Dang I got deleted lol
Sounds like fascism.
Wait till you get into critical class theory. And your eyes will open up.
Theory's are just that , a theory and it demands the same proof of evidence as the generally approved beliefs? Theory of relativity? Believe it or not.✌️
Pretty white girl blows wind 💨
It’s communism
Psychology won.
And its false
Sounds scared...
They should be
Academia is now an actual detriment to becoming educated.
"Social justice is an actual impediment to acquiring human capital"
--Thomas Sowell
Sweetie, when you try to remain impartial between the oppressed and the oppressor, that's just siding with the oppressor through cowardice.
Claire sided with the oppressors during the lockdowns and vax_ine mandates.
Ooh. An invisible reply. I guess someone isn't very good at keeping a civil tongue in their head?
My reply included her siding with a certain mandated medical procedure....I can see my reply, but maybe gulag censored it your end!?🤔
Except when there actually is neither and oppressor, nor oppressed dumb dumb.
It’s fascism
Can u tell me what fascism is? Or CRT for that matter?
@@flabberjiggles4825 CRT: demonising western democracy so that the other races can feel good about themselves whilst living in a western democracy
@@effkay3691 not even a little bit close
@@flabberjiggles4825 Oh you can’t even take a joke!
Lies. The positivist attitude is very useful to higher economic classes. These calls for impartiality are nothing but excuse for conservatism. This journalist holds burgeois values, she is definitely more privileged than for example an African American lesbian woman who will be encountering a lot more negativity, pressure and bullying in her life. Critical theory is important because it challenges any kind of injustice brought about in an economic system based on inequality. You cannot approach the tough situation of black people in America or other westerb countries, for example, with this impartiality BS. People suffer, they're more likely to be beaten up or killed by police, and this person calls for some impartiality when studying these injustices? This is nothing but an excuse for keeping things as they are today... for the interest of capitalists, those with big economic power, and corporations. Racism, sexism and other types of discrimination are their tool, and critical approach to them undermines their influence. They're worried, so they send out messages like this.
People trained in critical theory are fascists or have fascistic behaviors
Problem is that they’re not thinking
It isn’t dominant
Your premise is wrong. It hasn't been taken up by a great portion of academia. Therefore your conclusions are wrong. It is what it is, a right wing talking point.
In some areas CRT ( which is racist ) is dominant as any one who speaks out against the CRT fraud is attacked in the methods outlined in CRT theory training .
CRT was required training at where I work and as I cannot make myself lie I was not able to complete the automated training and when I tried to take the issues up the chain of command my too boss admitted to making CRT training mandatory as he used to be a professor who taught it in his sociology class .
CRT is designed to cause a psychosis like manipulation to divide populations against those who would detect and oppose the destructive frauds of Maoism or Marxism .
@@alt3241 “anyone who speaks out is attacked”
How so? Are their critiques analyzed and dismantled? Because so many of the critiques are based off a poor understanding of the concept?
Or do you have actual examples of people with valid criticisms being “attacked”?
How is her premise wrong dumb dumb?
Who is this woman?
Claire Lehman of quillette fame I think. Unsubbed from all her channels once she came out in favour of lockdowns and vax_ine mandates.
So the fact that it's full of lies and is designed to destroy the structure we have doesn't bother you that much just the unfairness what I hate evil I just realized I want you to hate evil too
Impartiality ?
If she can't recognise that she's coming from the stand point of a white middle class woman of colonial heritage then she'll never understand that she can't be neutral.
The idea of impartiality is flawed and is generally taken as the received establishment view
out racist the racist; R u not Ntertaind?
Who is a SWEED? BIGGEST BANK! 🤔 PRETTY SIMPLE! CHANGE ENTICES CHANGE! EVERYBODY BUCKLE UP!
Neutrality as in whiteness?
It’s racist