Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which is an Indian variant of the blasphemy law, violates the secular character of Constitution. In a pronouncement that reiterates the constitutional protection to freedom of speech and expression, the Supreme Court has said that unwitting or careless “insults“ to religion should not be prosecuted as this would amount to misuse of law.
Your each and every lecture is helpful for exams
Nice explanation dii😊
PK movie is not a disrespect to any religion but is an expose of the ones who use religion for their private gains.
Does that mean that when our politicians give communally or religiously instigating sermons or speeches, that will also be covered under blasphemy?
Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which is an Indian variant of the blasphemy law, violates the secular character of Constitution.
In a pronouncement that reiterates the constitutional protection to freedom of speech and expression, the Supreme Court has said that unwitting or careless “insults“ to religion should not be prosecuted as this would amount to misuse of law.
@@EMINENTLAWCLASSES Can you tell me case laws of this. Some, specially dealing with politicians and religious gurus