The missile system Iran used were Silkworm missiles which are very advanced anti-naval missiles. They are not nuclear, but in the US there is one thing you can do to guarantee a response, and that is to fuck with our boats.
Please keep in mind that all the specs for the us is grossly underestimated. The military will NEVER tell the unclassified specs and thus our weapons are far more dangerous than they appear. Also the planet is only 7910 miles in diameter so both parties can nuke anywhere in the world.
Plus most people forget the closest distance to Moscow is by going North, NOT WEST. Most don't realize just how close the US and Russia actually are because of the way maps are laid out on a 2D Surface, we'd just have to inform Canada that sheet hit the fan.
I've seen plenty of comments railing against things you don't know, but I think it's wonderful that you're both taking the time to learn knew things and expand your horizons. I appreciate that you share your journey with us.
Just remember...America pioneered weapons with the use black powder from China a long time ago..we in the U.S. shared a lot of the tech to pretty much the world and its always evolving. What we show is decades behind of what there really is. People be talking about laser weapons and such which is real...just ask Hawaii. Blue roofs that don't get touched by em. Thats all truly nothing to what their really is. Trump once said in a speech..."We have weapons from which the likes the world has never seen..and we hope to never use them". Can you imagine what has been built? It would look alien to the world.
@@yassandfatsWhen your lady said..."why is he rubbing it?" You both should react to Desert Storm and see how well prepared my people are in a fight or flight situations. We may be a young generation...but we sure will fight for one anothers freedom and anyone else that needs help! I just wish the world can come together for a common enemy seeking out to destroy everything thats good.......
@@yassandfatsWe in the U.S. have exercises to help out the majority of the Country's on how to fight and defend their own...those videos are awesome. I just really wish we could all come together and fight the real evil enemy behind the curtains. Imagine all the new beautiful help we can have with each other..and the real tech to save everything.
The one thing I wish the video had called out: Russia combined its ships for coastal defense and attack into one group and called that their "navy" whereas the USA has a coast guard and a navy that are distinct. You won't find aircraft carriers in the coast guard, but the boats they do have are perfectly capable of sinking invading boats all by themselves.
US Navy is obsolete and rusting down Russian dose not have a proper Navy true but mostly its a land locked country why who'd it have it, also what can a navy do when it will be hit by wave of missals ? Your ships are coffins and were that for a long time the only thing it can do is be is a problem to third world military One small hole in any ship and its done after the fight it going back home to most likely never sail again
I don't think you guys realize how large the US land mass is. If you were to drive from New York to California at about 70 MPH, and drive nonstop other than to get fuel. No stopping to sleep and only eating very quickly when you stop for fuel or while driving. It would take you 3 days. You could drive for a whole day thru parts of the US and never see another human being.
One of my favorite videos were the ones where people from Europe would say they are seeing all the states over a weekend and the follow up on "why didn't anybody warn us that this country is so big".
Takes about the same time to drive across Australia. We have a tenth of your population. We drive longer distances seeing less people then you would in the us.
@@matthewcharles5867 I did not realize that about Australia. The size of the country I mean. I knew the population was much less leading to a lot of open space. You learn something everyday. I never compared the land masses obviously or I would have known about the size. Thank you all knowledge is good.
The US is not typically defending its land, since its neighbors (Canada and Mexico) are friendly. We can focus on defending and offending by air and sea.
The private production works in the US because of something called the Defense Production Act which would allow the President to ORDER production and control of military supplies in American factories.
Проблема еще только в том... что Россия уже два раза побеждала в войнах в разных обстоятельствах, а США только начинала мелкие войны в других странах против ничтожно слабых сил. И кст почему США не смогли победить в Афганистане за 20 лет с таким сильным составом войск?
@@luviagiletta2254, The Gulf War was an armed conflict between Iraq and a 42-country coalition led by the United States. The coalition's efforts against Iraq were carried out in two key phases: Operation Desert Shield, which marked the military buildup from August 1990 to January 1991; and Operation Desert Storm, which began with the aerial bombing campaign against Iraq on 17 January 1991 and came to a close with the American-led liberation of Kuwait on 28 February 1991. Лично мне смешно
US has the 1st, 2nd and 4th biggest Airforces. Mean while Russia can't even kill a defenseless RAF Reconnoissance plane. Anyway, it would be Red February all over again.
@yastyman yeah, I can show you the video if you like that explains the circumstances and I believe the UK admitted it happened. The S-300 and S-400 is also garbage and is why India bought Patriot instead, I can also show you someone who is a expert that explains in details why and he debunks Patriot myths. Or how a lot of their planes break down going near their fastest speed too long. Btw US invented hypersonics and have new hypersonics now too, and have missles the can actually go Mach 11. Heck America set up Russia's tank manufacturing while giving Russia money and the materials, we also gave them many Sherman's and trucks that during the Invasion of Afghanistan, 1/3rd were American vehicles.
The US Military destroyed the Iraqi Army in about one week,Day and night bombing ,the Iraqi at the start of the war was the forth largest Military in the world and was reduced to ruble
This is old... Patriot missile (NOT the patriot missile defense system) carries 10 warheads, far more accurate and each independently targetable, within 9 feet accurracy...
😂😂😂😂😂 Не дай бог американским властям и Пентагону всерьёз воспринять данное видео сравнение, Пару сотен гиперзвуковых ракет с ядерной составляющей и 🇺🇸 нет..Посейдон потом зашлифует остальное побережье.
You obviously don't know that the US is who first started Hypersonic, long before Russia. When the Soviet Union ended. We stopped, thinking we wouldn't need them. But not only will we do Hypersonic missles, but Hypersonic jets AGAIN ALSO.
Vietnam is everybody's go to America lost war. In 1973, the US and North Vietnam had the Paris peace accords where the North Vietnam recognized South Vietnam independence. The US pulled out every combat soldier that same year and began to invest heavily in the now autonomous South Vietnam economy. The North reneged on the Paris accords and attacked small village in the North at first to see a response. Once they realized the US wasn't going to remobilize for war, they attacked the rest of South Vietnam, with Saigon eventually falling without a single US combat division in the country. In terms of military, Vietnam was no loss!!!!!
The US has not won a war against a unified nations since WWII. Iraq and Libya the only two you could say were "victories" (if the condition of victory was destabilizing a sovereign nation and creating a regional humanitarian crisis) were NATO coalitions against fragmented countries in the middle of civil wars.
@joebenson528 Panama, first Gulf War Afghanistan and Iraq. Do your research the US military has defeated every enemy its ever came across only having a tie with Great Britiain in the war of 1812. I dare you to challenge me on this. In fact, I'm begging you, please tell me I'm wrong🙏
The US couldn't even really fight in Vietnam since China made it pretty clear that they would invade Vietnam and declare war on the US if they did. The US fought with both hands tied behind it's back and had to constantly give up captured ground and villages becouse doing too much might trigger the chinese. They also won every single major engagement in Afghanistan and made them hide in the hills for all the years it occupied that country. Saying that is a Loss is borderline lying since they were absolutely dominating the Taliban until some orange man decided to pull out before the new governement they build was ready to take over and then gave the old dementia patient a ticking time bomb that led to the evacuation of Afgahnistan. Iraq was far from a fragmented country. It was a very stable dictatorship since the dictator simply killed the opposition like putin does these days. Iraq also fought using the same tactics and equipment Russia fought with. Russia has since changed it's tactics to be closer to the american tactics since they realised they were shit. NATO tactics which are to a large extent the same as US tactics have proven very effective against Russia when employed by ukraine which is even more impressive if you consider that Ukraine is learning them on the go and without a lot of the weapons they were designed to work with. If you look throughout history you will find that russia has never been a good military. Not during the Tsars were they were beaten by Napoleon who made them hide and burn Moscow, not during WW1 where Germany beat them so hard they had a civil war, not before WW2 when they invaded finland and took massive casualties for a tiny amount of land, not during WW2 where the country would have collapsed if not for the American lend-lease and not for bad luck of the germans, not during the Cold War where the russian forces failed in Afghanistan much much harder then you think the Americans failed and basically never anytime else. They always have been shit at the art of war. Compared to Desert Storm where the opening air war is like the Mona Lisa.
@einehrenmann6156 The US never occupied Afghanistan, and the T did not "hide in the hills" they ambushed from the hills. Every city south of Kabul was in Pashtun hands since 2007. That's why the US puppet government in Kabul capitulated within days (weeks before CNN was told by the Pentagon to report NATO's defeat). Outside of the capital, NATO had zero support. We (US) barely had support in the few public areas we "held".
@johnbattle7518 Read comments before you reply to them, shortbus. I mentioned Iraq. The "Gulf War" was Iraq vs 27 nations. The result: Stalemate Iraq invasion 2003 came after a civil war in the country broke out. It was 20+ NATO countries (not just the US) against Saddam and the few loyalists he had left (~50,000 RGFC). Again where is the "victory" there. All we did was waste tax dollars to create a ISIL caliphate. The US lost in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Post-Gaddafi Libya, Somalia, The YouCrane (The "legion", Patriot/Himars systems etc are NATO forces), and pick an African country that has ousted US forces; Burkina Faso, Mali etc. The "US President" and self-proclaimed "Joey B." is fumbling US hegemony one ice cream cone and diaper change at a time. Our next loss will likely be Taiwan province or Korea again.
As far as nuclear missiles. The US has spent billions of dollars upgrading our missiles constantly. While Russia does not at all. And is not even sure if half of their missiles would even work or get where they were supposed to go. Also US missles will, and DO fly 8,000 miles. And another thing he forgot to mention is, they can hit anywhere in the world. They fly longer than the circumference of the earth. So Russia doing missles that supposedly fly 11,000 miles, is most likely Propaganda, they're having a hard time just maintaining they're Old Missles. And it wouldn't even make sense. What? they want to go 1 and a third times around the world? Lol😂
The US is 40 times larger then the UK ,plenty of space for military equipment , i dont think you realize how big the US truly is .a lot of Russia is just a polar wasteland
And the missle distance is basically useless to mention seeing as the Earth isn't even 8000 miles in diameter. So even 6000 miles is more than enough to hit basically any target if fired the correct direction around the Earth.
Это видео сделано для зумеров и вот почему: 1. Ресурсы. Какие бы ни были у США технологии, их надо производить. В Украине СВО показало, что уже запад спорит, кто ракеты даст, тк без ресурсов китая и россии, эти ракеты и технику не из чего делать. Она просто иссякнет, а россия может играть в долгую, про это следущий пункт 2. Россия огромная страна. Ее физически не возможно победить милитаризованным путем. И россия, благодаря своим ресурсам и производству может воевать десятками лет. 3. Размер армии. Западным людям надо понять, что армия в сша контрактная. Обычного американца сейчас не заставишь пойти воевать, тк он занять придумыванием нового гендера. Но, если на россию ступит нога врага, каждый, буквально каждый мужик возмется за автомат, каждая женщина возмется за станок и даже ребенок будет заниматься производством патронов, если того потребует защита родины. Автор этого видео немного не понимает ментальность нашу и наш дух. А украинцы, они такие же как мы. Не те, что зигу кидают и фашисты, а обычные мобилизованные работяги. Такие же мужики, вот и воевать с ними сложно, потому что русские не сдаются.
As far as "On Foot" 25th infantry Division is the definition of Light Infantry as they are stationed on the Hawaiian islands. Their movement standards are every soldier must be able to march twenty miles in under four hours with their full combat load-out, BUT even 25th has a battalion of Utility helicopters and a company of Cargo helicopters. That's twenty-five of the ubiquitous 11+ passenger Blackhawks and ten 40+ passenger Chinooks. When I served with them, we could deliver 500 combat-loaded a$$-kickers anywhere within 200m (300+Kilometers) of our base with three hours notice and move 500 men 500 miles (800 kilometers) every five hours indefinitely. Light infantry doesn't have vehicles heavier than HMMWV's so they can be slung under the helicopters full of troops to bypass otherwise impassible terrain. Light infantry's biggest hindrance is ensuring the supply lines of the FARP's (forward arming and refueling point) to support follow-on air-mobile operations. We can use the Chinooks as mobile FARPs for the forward-operating elements and even move artillery to support our troops as they advance via air-transport. Each Chinook can move a FMTV (ten-ton cargo truck), a 155mm canon with its crew and ammo or huge fuel bladders and ammo supply for the attack choppers and a security force on top. A flight of Blackhawks (10 birds) can handle moving five 105mm canons, five HMMWV's to tow them with and their crews, ammo and a security force on top. Blackhawks cruise at around 220KPH and can go as fast as 300KPH. They're called Tropic Lightning for a reason. Air Assault!
If we are attacked on our own land what most fail to recognize is a lot of of citizens own numerous firearms and hunt wildlife and we love our country and will take up arms to defend country. I took 4 deer past 300 yards last year so myself and others can hit targets a long distance. I myself own 21 combined rifles and handguns. I also reload my own ammo and have 100+ ammo cans full. I am a 25 year military veteran.
So what you're saying is that USA has no innocent civilians right? Kind of the way Israel said civilians were attacked, instead of saying off duty IDF military personel were attacked. Remember, Israel send everyone to military school... EVERYONE. So,hypothetically speaking it would be open season on every single person in USA? Just my curiosity
In reality, most of the gun owners in America are in the southern states.. the north normal citizens don’t have or have never even worked a gun before… now you take into this generation.. I’d say out of our whole population here in the states… maybe 1 to 2 million men would fight… the rest would run… and in the next 5 to ten years Americans may not have guns anymore.. most the comments are talking about from 30 years ago… heck young men here are soft as shit, we have the masculinity is bad make boys feminine movement.. so no…
I have worked with a number of very good Russian engineers. The problem for Russia is that many of their best technologists leave for more lucrative jobs in the west. It is not a lack of intellect, but an inability to retain skilled people. The culture in Russia does a disservice to itself.
The US can activate a war time production (Trup did this for Covid for ventilators and vacs), we did this in the last two world wars too, factory are payed to switch over to a military team close to what they already make, so that is what will happen, and recruiting will ramp up and all will be called in under the Draft all military age men (women too now or its being voted on, cant remember right now.) will report to designated locations for health checks and training locations if pryer serves then orders. Last I saw russian soldiers ( a teacher conscripted and some farin fighters ) where sent out with no training and no orders, ww2 guns only 4 for the squad and limited ammo, some non. Drones are then now warfare, which isn't even covered here and should be its heart breaking really.
I actually carried AT4 in Ft Irwin for our Annual combat training in the mountains of the the Mojave dessert. But one of my squad mates had a javelin and he took down an "enemy" chopper while we were hiding in the mountains. It is all tech based and not actual artillery fired, of course. But the targeting and hits are registered and reported back to field command to show how effective defense and attack was. I loved those massive combat operations. It is company against company. And the largest usually at the end of the training was battalion against battalion. Infantry leads the way!!! Hoooah!
@@Acefakeboo The modern coast guard is not capable of fighting in a high intensity peer conflict combat. They are a glorified federal police service or DEA with small patrol ships.
The hypothetical capabilities of an Aircraft carrier is one thing, the ability to provide the resources to fulfill potential is another. The average air component of a deployed carrier during the Vietnam war never surpassed 50 due to the threat of losing so many air assets if a single ship were to sink. And today we are severely under equipped, the existing equipment is poorly maintained (if at all), and current ammunition production is not even capable of suppling a low intensity insurgency in Afghanistan. RU produces more 152/155mm artillery shells per month (35,000) than the US produces per year (27,000). Small arms ammunitions is even more lopsided. Recently the US army announced they will increase production of 155mm shells to 28,000/month, but it will take 4 years to reach that mark. RU has not even ramped up to war capacity yet (70,000/month). The RU backed DPR and LPR forces are firing more artillery shells per day than all of NATO combined produces. 1,000 tanks with 1,000 shells is going to lose to 500 tanks with 5,000 shells. Given the results of the Ukr civil war, those 500 tanks could take out 2,000 tanks and that's with DEVGRU and CAG ATGM teams operating within Ukr against DPR and LPR *militiamen* (not RU ground forces).
It was a soviet scientist that actually figured out the equations for stealth aircraft technology. The US just implemented the initial soviet research and dramatically refined it to what it is today....
You mean American carriers sinking after getting wrecked by random iceberg while Russians would be chilling with nuclear icebreakers (which only Russia has).
If it's so simple, why hasn't the US attacked Russia? Why hasn't the "almighty" U.S. Army invaded Russia yet? After all, Russia is labeled by America as its number one enemy, which supposedly threatens the existence of the US. Why isn't Russia still in ruins like Iraq, Libya or Yugoslavia, to which the Americans brought "democracy" by carpet bombing, flattening entire cities with civilians in those countries? Maybe because the U.S. knows that in such an eventuality it can get a big backlash? Why does Russia, which according to this video has decrepit military equipment and a paltry military force, produce more weapons per month for the war in Ukraine than all NATO countries combined? This is not Russian propaganda, but the conclusion of Western politicians and analysts. Why did Russia, with an economy that was supposedly torn to shreds, stand up to the sanctions and establish its own production, at the same time orienting its market to Asia? Moreover, it ranked fifth among the world's largest economies. Again, these are not my words, but an IMF report. So if Russia were such a pathetic country as such propaganda videos claim, the U.S. would not miss the opportunity to attack Russia. Why? Because it's very easy and convenient to attack the weak, they can't fight back. Libya and Yugoslavia will not let you lie about that.
The fleet in the current realities cannot play a big role when it is applied to strong countries like Russia. Maybe 50 years ago the fleet played a significant role, but now that Russia (and not only Russia) has Kinzhal hypersonic missiles in its arsenal, the entire US fleet can be easily reset and the Russian fleet will not be needed for this, and the US government knows about it.
Дурачок ты! Зачем много флота ли оружия? Если есть одна ракета и от твоего хвалёного флота ни останется и мокрого места!🤣 Так же как и от вашей пендосовской страны! Так что живи и молись своему богу чтоб ваши тупые политики не начали эту войну! Ибо ты если она начнётся к сажалению и к большой вероятности даже об этом и не узнаешь! 😂
America has so much military stuff because of our GDP. Please remember America is very much like 50 smaller countries acting as one. Each individual state strives for financial success. That generates an enormous amount of money to buy a big military. You meantioned storing all the military hardware. America is covered in military bases. All branches of the military have many bases all over the country. I believe the Marine Base called 29 Palms in California is as big as the greater London metropolitain area. We have many bases that size. Our Naval fleets are so big they are a vital income for several large cities with Navy bases. (San Diego, Norfolk etc) Dozens and dozens of bases that are several square miles in size. Storing 300,000 vehicles isnt tough at all. Lol
Small countries really. England fits in one of our 50 states Louisiana and England is Small than 31 of our 50 states. Its 4,509 kilometers across America. Come on, you have never driven 18 hours to get to grandma's house lol
During President Eisenhower's presidency during the Cold War, he told the Soviet Union that if they dropped nuclear bomb on an American City he would turn every major City into a charcoal bricket!
Дайвай, потыкай палкой в медведя, что может пойти не так? Сначала нам немножечко страшно, а потом становится похуй, а когда нам похуй - страшно становится всем.
She is correct about subsidiary companies being the better option. If the state tells you to build weapons, you do as your told. If you have healthy competition between multiple companies they will innovate and bring the newest technology.
You guys were wondering about how and where these assets are kept. If you google and get through dated stats, Bragg/Liberty on the Army side is still the largest. Naval/Marine corps will pop up. Also, Naval yards and many Airstation's tend to be coastal. Not all. Same for the Air Force... But for the stockpiles and whatever questions or concerns... they're located all over the continental US. I think it's worth mentioning the sizes of certain training areas/proving grounds for each branch as they take up an amazing amount of land or acreage too.
I’m an American. But I’m humble enough to recognize that Russia has hypersonic delivery systems to deliver nuclear weapons. If Russia were to do a surprise nuclear strike on America and our navy, we would be screwed.
A generalization but Having private companies produce weapons during peacetime means on-going competition which means on-going innovation including production efficiencies. Once a large war breaks out, all the companies shift into production mode.
Don’t forget about the will to fight as well. Russia would have a large number of conscripted soldiers while the US has a voluntary service backed up by the National Guard and recent ex servicemen that can be called upon, before ever even having to use the Draft Act to raise additional troops. A lot of the facilities in the US can be turned from manufacturing industrial equipment to military equipment and hardware in a relatively short time period. This along with the fact the the US spends more on its military budget than like the next 6-8 countries combined. Beyond that the group that holds the most firearms is the US citizens. A lot of which grew up hunting, firing ranges tournaments and similar activities. Good luck to who ever would decide to FAFO. Now some hick with a 30-30 isn’t going to do any good against a nuke, but, other than the nuke aspect….FAFO
The fleet in the current realities cannot play a big role when it is applied to strong countries like Russia. Maybe 50 years ago the fleet played a significant role, but now that Russia (and not only Russia) has Kinzhal hypersonic missiles in its arsenal, the entire US fleet can be easily reset and the Russian fleet will not be needed for this, and the US is good about this know
As far as replacing military ammunition parts, tanks, ships jets planes helicopters, missiles. This Storyteller, fed you a crock of cr_p. I really can't help but wonder if Russia was behind this. LOL Just think about WW2. The US turned so many factories into making military parts, plane tanks bombs ships We made our military everything we needed. Made most of England's, and also supplied RUSSIA, with money, and tons of their military things they needed. They may have lost to Germany, without US help. The US made thousands of ships tanks planes artillery, rifles, jeeps trucks, ammo, bombs. Every thing we needed, and thousands for other countries, to win the war. All of are military supplies by Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrup, and all of our defense companies, and many more companies, would immediately get on board, and start production of military items. And other companies that could help would. Even if they didn't, they could be ordered to. As far as him saying Russia could replace everything so easily, and fast, is a joke. Right now they're losing military equipment daily with the War in Ukraine. And they cannot replace a ton of what they lost. A lot of the reason is they import a ton of parts, computer chips and other things from the US, and around the world, for their military components. Some of these, they don't have the knowledge for, and or factories. 😂
In the computer industry, there is a saying, bad data in equals bad data out, and this video you are reacting to, is bad data. The video obviously has a goal of entertaining, using suspense and playing loose with logic and facts to create that entertainment. It is horrible information for it purposefully misinforms and misdirects, or at least I hope that is behind why they are so horribly wrong about their positions, because the opposite would mean they are just that ignorant. The US typically reduces the performance stats of its capabilities by greater than 20%, in order to retain some elements of surprise as well as keep the other countries from knowing where the limits are for which they can either build to take advantage of or strategize to maximize their positions. Most other countries overstate their capabilities to create the image that they are more capable than they are, this is to intimidate and keep aggressors in check having to deal with this extra capability. An example is the SU-57 & J-20 aircraft. Russia and China make the claims in their reveals that these aircraft are 5th Gen aircraft more advanced and capable than the US's F-22, let alone the most produced 5th Gen aircraft ever, the F-35. When these aircraft are actually produced and deployed, it becomes very evident that they lack stealth, supercruise, and even at times, advanced electronics. The Indian Air Force has routinely spotted the J-20 at ranges greater than 60miles, and the J-20's engines are so weak, that the Chinese are forced to buy their engines from Russia even after spending billions trying to develop its own domestic source, and even still with the Russian engines (the same, if not slightly less advanced, that are in the SU-35) they are unable to achieve supercruise and have severely limited their ranges & usages as ship-based aircraft. With the current corruption scandals in Chinese Defense, it is questioned just how capable the J-20's electronics & weapons systems are for we see how badly overhyped other weapon systems and electronics are in the Russian version or similar systems, with 4th gen aircraft easily making it through air defense systems, easily countering air to air and ground to air systems, and how badly the naval defense systems are in comparative to their western counterparts. Russia is in a worse position than China is, in that China at least has an advanced electronics industry, capable of making chips and other tech hardware even if not the most advanced like the US, S. Korea, Taiwan, or Japan. Russia has to import all its electronic tech equipment, which is currently highly limited due to sanctions. Russia doesn't control GPS signals, so it created a counterpart, but the problem there is that they only have a few satellites capable of being used in the Russian version of GPS. China is limited by this same issue. The US simply shuts off the GPS signals to Russian & Chinese weapon systems and these powerful militaries get defanged to being only slightly better than the 1960s requiring large amounts of sorties to achieve the same results that a single US weapon system delivers in a single sortie. It also limits viewing the battle space and knowing what is actually happening at any one moment. China has missile capabilities to attack US bases at Guam and US Naval forces in the Indian Ocean, South China Sea, & Pacific Ocean, but it only has satellite coverage of these spaces for minutes every day, an absolute must for its weapon system to even hope for an attack on the US Naval forces. Within hours, the US could render China completely blind to what is beyond its shores effectively removing these weapon systems from being effective. Russia is in a worse position, relying on over-the-counter civilian tech, and Chinese sharing of information. Meanwhile, the US has an entire department in its Defense devoted to war in space, from space and to space...The US Space Force.
Apparently you have not known Russia and China for a long time, you are stuck in the 90s. Technology has long gone ahead in Russia and China. Russia does not use GPS. Refresh your data
"the su 57 which they claim is better than anything america has to offer." Then proceeds to talk about the f35, completely disregarding the fact that the su57 isn't even STEALTH, and the f22 Raptor is still the most dominant aircraft in use. I can't take this video seriously.
@@bobbombar6711 I understand where you're coming from and appreciate the assist, but the f22 is still stealth where as the su57 is not. The f22's data that has been made public still shows it being superior. It's not like it has regressed in the last 5-10 years. Also, I'm aware this is just a react channel and I'm merely speaking on the video that they are reacting to.
@kabrotherrepeat true but for example the a- 10 can online / joined yhe flee in the 70's granted they just got some upgrades but w.t.f. Same for the f- 16 . So you see my point ,granted this video does touch on rusdias loses in Ukraine. But at the same time they don't have as many large surfaces vessels . Also they didn't even touch on the use of drones even though they have been in use for well over 20 + years
@@bobbombar6711 exactly, that's why I said I couldn't take it seriously 😇. The video, although entertaining is missing a lot of key data points. Giving Russia more credit than they deserve lol.
OK, think about this, the REASON why the U.S. does not run it's own government owned and controlled munitions factories, is simple, WHERE do you imagine the BEST source of innovation and IDEAS would come from? some government employee who just wants to do his/her job and make a living, or a private company who wants to develop the next great things to improve their profits? the REASON why the U.S. is so far ahead in tech, is that we keep the damned government out of weapons technology and development, and that factory that makes Russian munitions, guess what would be on the top 10 list of places to be leveled if it came to a shooting war with Russia?
The earth's diameter is only 7,926 miles, so why would you plan to loop the earth before hitting your target. So at 4,000 miles, you could hit any target on the planet, at 8,000 miles you could circumnavigate the earth and hit yourself. So, what use is 14,000 miles? The moon is 238,900 miles away, so that's not their target, which Russia would know if they had ever been there.
It is immediately obvious that you had a bad geometry at school... Arc length and diameter are different things... The surface of the earth is more than 40,000 kilometers, while the diameter is 12,000 kilometers
Just going to make this clear right now, even if Russia, WITH all of its allies faced the U.S. by itself in an attempt to invade, they would fail miserably today. The main defensive strength of the U.S. isn't its military strength, but its geography. There's a few videos that explain this fairly well. I suggest you check some of them out. Would make for great reaction content too. The part of this video I heavily disagree with is Russia's potential advantage in naval forces. There is NO WAY Russia or any other nation could contend with the U.S. Full stop. Its not even something that should be entertained. Americas power projection over the world is due to its naval capability more than anything. The next 10 countries combined aren't as large or powerful as the U.S. Navy. Its a joke to even compare the two, same with the Airforce. We have complete dominance because of those two things alone. If nuclear weapons were completely out of the picture, the U.S. could conquer any nation in the world within a week by conventional warfare standards. (i.e. no guerilla warfare).
We also change the production of factories like car, and tractor manufacturers. But a lot of other manufacturers as well. During WWII we were making 10K each of tanks, planes, ships, weapons, and ammo. We were supplying the world with weapons.
What this video doesn’t explain, how heavily defended each coast region is, the sheer size of the us mainland(most Europeans have zero clue) and most importantly how the US military doctrine works. Every single branch is specifically designed and structured to support and work with the others down to the lowest level. Infantry support tanks, tanks supported by helicopters etc. check out the video of the us liberation of Kuwait and invasion of Iraq. Shows how truly effective the US is at dismantling air defense and ground units with the same equipment Russia still fields.
The video does not reflect even a tenth of the power of the Russian Ground Forces. Javelin turned out to be shit, but the Russian anti-tank guided missiles, on the contrary, were on top. The BMP-3 is equipped not only with a 30-mm automatic cannon, but also with a 100-mm artillery gun, not counting anti-tank guided missiles. Russian small ships are capable of launching Kalibr cruise missiles, but the Americans can only launch Tomahawk cruise missiles from large ships. The presence of Russian sea-based hypersonic missiles "Zircon" simply makes American aircraft carriers useless junk - they will be guaranteed to be destroyed, because the Americans have nothing to shoot down Russian hypersonic missiles. In short, the video is COMPLETELY devoid of objectivity. And if Russia is such a technologically backward country, then why do Americans fly into space on Russian space rocket engines?
Keep in mind the US is HUGE - we have huge military bases all over the lower 48 . . Each part of our military (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard) have their own military bases - again these bases are enormous! Plenty of room for ground force equipment and vehicles! What is funny, if you come to America -- you will never see these bases unless you make it a mission to go to that base - which you can go there - but you will not get on base without proper clearance etc..
All you need to know is the US has fought and won multiple wars across the globe, and can famously deploy expeditionary forces anywhere on Earth within 24hr, Russia has not, and cannot. In fact, Russia is struggling to conduct a war right on their own doorstep. Ukraine is managing to fend off Russia with US hand-me-downs, the same tech the US used to defeat Iraq in the first Gulf War in 1991. Imagine what we have now that's classified? It's not a matter of "could", it's more a matter of "would". Meaning the capability is there, but does the US have the WILL to use it is the only real question. If Russia didn't have nukes they'd have no seat at the table at all.
The United States sure don’t have a lot to show for even with all of this superiority 🤣. Afghanistan beat Russia and the United States with not even a fraction of the capabilities. The United States haven’t won a true 100% since WW2 and that wasn’t even fought by themselves. The United States leaders obviously knows things you keyboard warriors don’t. If the United States have classified things what makes you think Russia and other countries don’t?😂
US never fought near peer adversary 1 VS 1 since end of WW2, in both world wars Europeans did most of job (americans always showed up to the end of party.) In Vietnam and Korea Americans failed the instant Chinese and Soviets started to project part of their might on the region. You are also not capable of deploying forces anywhere if other countries wont allow if, it's feat of 30 countries, not USA. Do you think you guys magically teleported to Iraq? I have to remind you that if not for Europeans, Australians and Saudi's - Americans wouldn't be able to do something as much as land in Iraq. "Russia is struggling to conduct a war right on their own doorstep" Russia is fighting a country that by 2022 was second strongest nation in Europe, second largest nation in Europe, and is now backed finances, military, tech and intel wise by largest military and economical alliances in human history + while being under largest package of sanctions in history. And despite this, they are still kicking your a&s through Ukraine. "Ukraine is managing to fend off Russia with US hand-me-downs" Except they dont, as Ukraine's air forces stopped existing in few weeks in 2022 and majority of current Ukrainian military tech is not even Ukrainian. Ukraine's economy is also reduced to an IOU and is artificially put on life support by EU and NATO funds counting in hundred of billions, all of that just to allow Ukraine to exist. By the way USA never even fought a single nation 1 VS 1 as strong as Ukraine was in 2022, absolutely hilarious. "the same tech the US used to defeat Iraq in the first Gulf War in 1991. Imagine what we have now that's classified? " Clearly nothing seeing how you guys freaked out when Russians presented hypersonic missiles in 2018, you freaked out so much in fact that you left middle ranged missiles treaty, clearly indicating that USA has no way to counter those things. "but does the US have the WILL to use it is the only real question. " Americans dont have neither the will nor finances to do that, you are barely coping with 30 trillion debt while trying to fund both Ukraine and Israel at once, and those aren't even actual war fronts, what you plan to do with Russians is unknown to me seeing how you wont get any kind of air superiority over Russians.
In times of war, the President can order companies like General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, and Catapiller to retool and make weapons of war almost immediately. During WWII we did that and supplied all our allies with vehicles, planes, tanks and ships to combat Italy Germany and Japan. After WWII the US was so powerful we could have taken over the whole world. Europe was devastated with almost total destruction. Japan controlled much of Asia but thanks to a couple of nukes was pretty much a wreck. China was in bad shape and so was at least a third of Russia. The US was the only nation untouched, except for Pearl Harbour which is a very small area. We were producing 10k each of the following per year, tanks, planes, artillery, thousands of ships and untold amounts of ammo. We supplied Russia, Asia, and Europe with clothing, food, water, and countless othe things. We're very good at logistics as well. After the war we became the most powerful country on earth. Our factories were untouched. Where European and Asian factories were bombed to bits. General Motors, who makes Chevrolet, Buick, Cadillac and GMC sold 53% of the cars in the world, then you had Ford and Chrysler picking up what GM couldn't. WE WERE " BAD TO THE BONE" at the time. Europe and Asia didn't really become able to export to the US until the mid-1950s and that wasn't much. It took until the late 1960s until Japan exported its first cars to the US. The Toyota Corolla and Corona. Now everything is pretty much global in north America, Europe and Asia.
Don't forget that Canada was also untouched and sent troops and resources during WWII, as well. Australia and the Philippines were also needed to fight against Japan, as Japan tried to invade there too.
@@cybernegr no it’s not a victory. I wouldn’t suggest the use of nuclear weapons. It’s a dumb and useless weapon and if used everyone would die in both sides
Российские гепер звуковые ракеты Кинжал могут вывести из строя весь флот США. НЕ одна система ПВО не сможет перехватить эти ракеты. Нужда во флоте не актуальна когда есть такие ракеты
I love your fresh, almost naive , understanding of military forces. just for starters: 1) Any future war will first be waged using cyber. 2)Technology and Training will overcome any disadvantage in number of equipment or personnel. 3)The combat forces of the United States; infantry, artillery, special operations, fighter pilots, bomber pilots and naval vessels (aircraft carriers, destroyers, subs) are itching for an opportunity to use their training. Never underestimate young US servicemembers who are fueled by caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, and hate. 4)There are United States Military bases EVERYWHERE. The US has troops, equipment, naval assets, aircraft etc. in any place the US has deemed to be critical to defend (if not, they can have assets there withing 24hrs). There is no need to wait for troops and supplies to be sent over to stop an invasion. There are already forces ready to rock.
While the quote has been claimed to be bogus it is true, everyday Americans would not allow our coutry to be invaded. Japan’s Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto as saying: "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." So for russia to try to ivade would not go well for them. If you want to see a hreat video on innovation check out videos on the SR-71 Blackbird.
American companies bring multiple designs and specifications....... the US Government selects a design and improves the design. This is why American innovation is top notch, it forces companies come up with their best ideas in exchange to win Government contracts.
Russians have more men, experience, and are basically g&ds of artillery. Which mean Americans would be wrecked in land battles, because you guys are absolutely not having any kind of air superiority over Russians, Russia is not Syria and your stealth bombers are created from theories of Soviet researcher titled as "father of stealth" to begin with. Good luck with your Call of Duty fantasies.
As an American I can say we would never let someone over take us with numbers we would just spend and recruit more. Russia can call on every citizen and increase tax by 100% and still fall short
People outside of America love to make fun of us, but one of the explicit things our governed states is that we can go pretty much adjutant and we will be protected. That isn't possible for any other country. That is why the Americans got out of gaza almost immediately after the tragic events. We have that freedom
You are protected by NATO if not allies you are the same as other country but wait you will not be able to invade other countries anymore if brics make alliance
The Iranian missile you thought was the Satan II was actually the Silkworm Missile that the USA told Iran would be a declaration of war if they ever used. Also, another point not mentioned in thee video, you can have as many planes, tanks and boats/ships as you want, the manpower needed to be there is not there for Russia. Putin thinks that if they have more equipment, if a piece gets destroyed they can just move the operator to a new piece of equipment. Fact is, the US military does not attack the piece of equipment, as much as it aim to take out both the equipment AND the operator. Great reaction by the way!
And dont forget that in Russian nuckear doktrin we have that thing that called nuclear anti-marine fight. And nuclear submarines that bear 16 nuclear warhead can use them to fight against massive US navi. It can be a chance but if this happen one russian submarine can nuke big fleet.
The biggest issue Russia has, is one aircraft carrier, so how do they get aircraft where they need to be in order to fight the US? The US has 13 aircraft carriers. When you control the air you you control the fight
US can launch a global attack Russia can’t. US can fight multiple different wars all at once and Russia cannot plus US tech is like 30 years ahead of Russia.
What different wars? You haven't been able to decide for months whether to allocate money to help Ukraine, Israel or Taiwan. And soon you'll be passing a budget that you've blown up to unbelievable proportions. Stop meddling in the affairs of other countries, you were not invited. Take care of your own internal problems instead of proxy wars and overthrowing governments 10000 km away from your territories.
@@ivpr4264 Who is tf is “You” ? Get your weird ahh on some where. US is helping them all they can do that unlike a lot of other countries, Biden is also sending 95 billion dollars to Ukraine so talk about what you know what you think. We’d be in WW3 right now if US didn’t interfere in most of these wars by now.
@@ivpr4264 Who is tf is “You” ? Get your weird ahh on some where. US is helping them all they can do that unlike a lot of other countries, Biden is also sending 95 billion dollars to Ukraine so talk about what you know what you think. We’d be in WW3 by now if US didn’t interfere in most of these wars so stop thinking your so smart.
@@ivpr4264 Taiwan literally has a treaty with US for them to help them and Israel is an ally of America. Biden is sending 95 billion dollars to Ukraine after sending 45 billion last year so talk about the facts.
@@ivpr4264 Who is tf is “You” ? Get your weird ahh on some where. US is helping them all they can do that unlike a lot of other countries, Biden is also sending 95 billion dollars to Ukraine so talk about what you know what you think. We’d be in WW3 by now if US didn’t interfere in most of these wars so stop thinking your so smart.
Maintenance for the equipment maybe a bigger deciding factor. Russian Command corruption in buying substandard parts, if they buy them at all, would play a factor. US last I was in the Army and stories I keep hearing, places special emphasis on maintaining all Army equipment. From tanks and Jets, all the way to the individual Soldiers gas mask.
There's also the need for replacement components for maintenance. Many use components that were imported to Russia before the sanctions. The U.S. shouldn't have difficulty in getting needed components.
Government ran weapon production was Germany's downfall in World War 2. Putting all your eggs in one basket is never a good idea... Private companies produce competition, hence better Innovation.
In Germany, military equipment was produced by private companies, Hugo Boss - uniforms, Bayer AG - chemical weapons, Siemens Apparate und Maschinen GmbH - many components for various equipment, Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMW) - cars, motorcycles, Daimler-Benz (Mercedez-Benz) - engines for airplanes, tanks and submarines, Porsche - cars, self-propelled artillery, tried to make tanks.
Even if China joined Russia, both could not stop the US--that's assuming the US's own allies wouldn't get into it (which they would!) The US has 12 aircraft carriers, each one with a mobile airforce armed with nuclear and conventional weapons. The US could park 2 carriers off the coasts of Russia and China and still have plenty remaining to defend the homeland and its allies. Russia's one carrier, is a 70 year old diesel boat that can't move without tugboats and China has like 4 carriers, so perspective is key here. Now someone will say oh hypersonic missiles! Yes, the ones Patriot missiles are shooting down all over Ukraine. Russia loves to oversell its tech.
You're not defend your own country but you attack other countries, don't use "defend our country" If your purpose is just to attack other countries. Anywhere, Russia is top 2 strongest military, so it's not easy as you think to beat even invade them, once you over the crosses against them, they would not hesitate to attack your country(well, Russia has more nuclear boms than US, so be careful) .
The boasting of the United States will one day play a cruel joke on them. They have already forgotten that they lost the war to the peasants in slippers in Afghanistan and are discussing how they will fight the FIRST (not the second) army of the world. I will give you some figures from open sources. In the United States, out of 86 Pentagon ammunition factories, only 6 remain, and only 1 of them in Ohio produces 300,000 NATO caliber shells per year. In the USA, only 1 tank factory in Lima, Ohio produces 12 abrams per year. The F-35 project is closed. During several years of stagnation, when the F-16 production line was moved from Fort Worth, Texas to Greenville, South Carolina, production of these aircraft was discontinued. In 2023, 6 aircraft were produced. By about 2025, we will produce 4 new F-16s per month or 48 per year, Lockheed Martin Corporation told Defence24 its plans. For comparison, Russia produced in 2023 4.5 million artillery shells, 150 Iskander complexes. 1300 self-propelled artillery units, about 1300 multiple rocket launchers, 1.5 thousand new and upgraded tanks, as well as more than 2.5 thousand armored combat vehicles of various types, 2,518 infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers. 100 planes and 150 helicopters.In general, Russia surpassed the United States and the EU in the production of weapons by 7 times.
the reason we don't "own" our arms industry, is for Innovation and competition, we make. These companies compete against each other, bringing their best technology that they can muster. Creating superior technologies But during war time, like World War 2. These companies are under a special invocation clause, meaning at any point the President can deem these companies. "Non private" so to say, making them ramp up weapons production. This is how we were able to supply the allies during the world war 2
Not just our country. The US military protects the world's oceans, Europe, and every other ally we have. Including Pakistan oddly enough. Would be nice if other countries helped more, maybe we could get free healthcare 😮
US's privatized military industry is mostly do to Capitalist free market. The private sector acts as competition in hiring talented people the government may want on their pay roll. And most of the private companies have non military products that they could stop producing. I have no doubt the US government would be throwing around plenty of money for the private sector leading up to and during a war with another major country.
The US is powerful, but being a superpower has responsibility not to pick fights. We have people from all over the world, so you dont want to attack a country & cause unrest at home.
Russia would not contemplate initiating an attack on America. All we have to do is recall the historical events from World War Il, when Japan attempted a similar strategy the outcome was catastrophic. It has been said that the difference between Russia and Japan lies in potential consequences. Furthermore, it makes no sense for Russia to dispatch small patrol vessels to target America; such an act would be considered suicidal. They would not succeed. Furthermore, I highly doubt Russia's submarine capabilities are close to Americas. It should be clear who we would most likely believe as being the more powerful nation a country like America that has consistently demonstrated its abilities and can back it up, or a country like russia, whose military turned out to be more disappointing than we thought.
I wonder, did the video take into account the U.S. Coast Guard ships as well as the Navy ships? Since the Coast Guard is under Homeland Security and not the military they could have been missed. They're supposed to be able to be transferred to Navy command in the event of a war. I wonder if they'd be any help or not.
Your brain is ravaged by propaganda :) What wars has the US won? WW2? No, it's the Russians, so tell me? Look at Ukraine (NATO) and its 5 mobilizations in the Russian meat grinder, hypersonic kinzals will make the entire US Navy obsolete, you have to wake up man, 52 countries in a hybrid war against Russia and see the result!
I mean...even though the USA didnt have an end game, all those countries, except for Iran so far, have been left in total devastation. So...basically the USA just got tired of winning.subdoing those nations and moved on. All those governments got wasted/replaced, and the countries left in ruin and made 3rd world for the next several decades.
Add another comment for why reach would be important for pilots: When flying at the speeds these craft fly and the G-Force from the maneuvers, not to mention how tightly you are strapped in, you don't have the freedom to move your body. If you can't reach something it is not as simple as leaning forward because you are being pushed into your seat with the force of 8x your normal gravity. There are very strict height requirements as well because though I don't know if the seats are adjustable at all, they most definitely do not move a lot. On top of all this, you have to be a certain weight to safely eject when things go wrong. There are hundreds of regulations, but one of the biggest factors is will power. The selection process is brutal, and only the best of the class make it to some of these machines.
Russia has more ships , but most are non combat ready or outdated. Thatd be like Germany saying they got 10,000 tanks , but 8,000 are WW2 panzer tanks, that wouldn't last 5 minutes against modern tanks.
The author of this video is wrong. While Russia might have more range, intercontinental missiles can circumnavigate the Earth through a high earth orbit. Every city in Russia is within range of US missiles. This also didn't take USA's strategic bombers like the B2 or our subs. They didn't discuss it because they were making an effort to not make it so one sided. Russia's equipment, including tanks, is also out of date. Russia is not built to do much except ground invasions and naval defense. Russian ships also routinely break down and have to towed back to port. Many don't even leave port
No one else compares to the USA Tech wise 30 years ahead.. and this is just the Tech we know about just think what the USA has that we don't know about... Dooom lol
The minuteman 3 is the icbm of America. The weapons on the U.S. submarines are Titan 2 missles and have a range of over 13000km. It caries 8x 475 kiloton warheads each. Each warhead is about 80x more powerful than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Как правильно сказал один человек "Победителей в этой войне не будет,да и скорей всего она будет последней для человечества"
Because Russia couldn't win conventionally and would use Nukes, assuming their nukes even work since many are old and not maintained
@@patrioticz2858 да ну правда что ли ну приходи проверим
@@ДианкаСурикова have no idea what you said 🤷♂️
Not sure they would even work....
@@ДианкаСурикова not sure what you said
The missile system Iran used were Silkworm missiles which are very advanced anti-naval missiles. They are not nuclear, but in the US there is one thing you can do to guarantee a response, and that is to fuck with our boats.
"Advanced" they missed their targets and weren't even intercepted tho they were probably older versions and/or export versions
I’m not familiar with the Silkworm missiles, what is so “bad” about them if their not nukes?
@@patrioticz2858source? Trust me bro
Silkworms are not advanced missiles at all by todays standards lmao
Please keep in mind that all the specs for the us is grossly underestimated. The military will NEVER tell the unclassified specs and thus our weapons are far more dangerous than they appear. Also the planet is only 7910 miles in diameter so both parties can nuke anywhere in the world.
Plus most people forget the closest distance to Moscow is by going North, NOT WEST. Most don't realize just how close the US and Russia actually are because of the way maps are laid out on a 2D Surface, we'd just have to inform Canada that sheet hit the fan.
I've seen plenty of comments railing against things you don't know, but I think it's wonderful that you're both taking the time to learn knew things and expand your horizons. I appreciate that you share your journey with us.
Thanks! It’s all new to us but our knowledge will only get better as we continue, it’s all educational to us ☺️
Just remember...America pioneered weapons with the use black powder from China a long time ago..we in the U.S. shared a lot of the tech to pretty much the world and its always evolving. What we show is decades behind of what there really is. People be talking about laser weapons and such which is real...just ask Hawaii. Blue roofs that don't get touched by em. Thats all truly nothing to what their really is. Trump once said in a speech..."We have weapons from which the likes the world has never seen..and we hope to never use them". Can you imagine what has been built? It would look alien to the world.
@@yassandfatsWhen your lady said..."why is he rubbing it?" You both should react to Desert Storm and see how well prepared my people are in a fight or flight situations. We may be a young generation...but we sure will fight for one anothers freedom and anyone else that needs help! I just wish the world can come together for a common enemy seeking out to destroy everything thats good.......
@@yassandfatsWe in the U.S. have exercises to help out the majority of the Country's on how to fight and defend their own...those videos are awesome. I just really wish we could all come together and fight the real evil enemy behind the curtains. Imagine all the new beautiful help we can have with each other..and the real tech to save everything.
They give you what they want you to know, y'all puppets that not knowledge, knowledge doesn't have limit or borders
The one thing I wish the video had called out: Russia combined its ships for coastal defense and attack into one group and called that their "navy" whereas the USA has a coast guard and a navy that are distinct. You won't find aircraft carriers in the coast guard, but the boats they do have are perfectly capable of sinking invading boats all by themselves.
US Navy is obsolete and rusting down Russian dose not have a proper Navy true but mostly its a land locked country why who'd it have it, also what can a navy do when it will be hit by wave of missals ? Your ships are coffins and were that for a long time the only thing it can do is be is a problem to third world military
One small hole in any ship and its done after the fight it going back home to most likely never sail again
Of the twelve aircraft carrier groups, only two can perform combat missions today.)) This is called degradation.
I don't think you guys realize how large the US land mass is. If you were to drive from New York to California at about 70 MPH, and drive nonstop other than to get fuel. No stopping to sleep and only eating very quickly when you stop for fuel or while driving. It would take you 3 days. You could drive for a whole day thru parts of the US and never see another human being.
One of my favorite videos were the ones where people from Europe would say they are seeing all the states over a weekend and the follow up on "why didn't anybody warn us that this country is so big".
And Russia is 2 and a half times larger then USA,,they will never directly fight each other cause they both know it will be end of the planet
Takes about the same time to drive across Australia. We have a tenth of your population. We drive longer distances seeing less people then you would in the us.
@@matthewcharles5867 except most people don't realize west Australia even has people.
@@matthewcharles5867 I did not realize that about Australia. The size of the country I mean. I knew the population was much less leading to a lot of open space. You learn something everyday. I never compared the land masses obviously or I would have known about the size. Thank you all knowledge is good.
The US is not typically defending its land, since its neighbors (Canada and Mexico) are friendly. We can focus on defending and offending by air and sea.
Капец! Вы что там курите!?Насмешили от души! Давно так не ржала !!! 🤪🤣😂🤣
The private production works in the US because of something called the Defense Production Act which would allow the President to ORDER production and control of military supplies in American factories.
Проблема еще только в том... что Россия уже два раза побеждала в войнах в разных обстоятельствах, а США только начинала мелкие войны в других странах против ничтожно слабых сил. И кст почему США не смогли победить в Афганистане за 20 лет с таким сильным составом войск?
Всё-таки одну сильную страну они победили за последние 50 лет. Это Ирак, который входил в топ-10 сильнейших стран мира по военной мощи.
Afghanistan was top 10 army... You cant even take Ukraine
@@luviagiletta2254 тебе не смешно?
@@ЕленаРосинская-м1т ни капли, в 90-ые годы Ирак считался одним из лидеров по военной мощи на Ближнем Востоке наряду с Ираном и Израилем.
@@luviagiletta2254, The Gulf War was an armed conflict between Iraq and a 42-country coalition led by the United States. The coalition's efforts against Iraq were carried out in two key phases: Operation Desert Shield, which marked the military buildup from August 1990 to January 1991; and Operation Desert Storm, which began with the aerial bombing campaign against Iraq on 17 January 1991 and came to a close with the American-led liberation of Kuwait on 28 February 1991. Лично мне смешно
😂 Почитал ваши коментарии 😂 было очень смешно их читать .. 😂🇷🇺✌️
Yeah because your fetal alcohol syndrome brain is delusional. Your S-300 and S-400 is bad lol.
US has the 1st, 2nd and 4th biggest Airforces. Mean while Russia can't even kill a defenseless RAF Reconnoissance plane. Anyway, it would be Red February all over again.
@@patrioticz2858 вы полны пропоганды
@@patrioticz2858 "can't even kill a defenseless RAF Reconnoissance plane"
do you really believe this?
@yastyman yeah, I can show you the video if you like that explains the circumstances and I believe the UK admitted it happened. The S-300 and S-400 is also garbage and is why India bought Patriot instead, I can also show you someone who is a expert that explains in details why and he debunks Patriot myths. Or how a lot of their planes break down going near their fastest speed too long. Btw US invented hypersonics and have new hypersonics now too, and have missles the can actually go Mach 11. Heck America set up Russia's tank manufacturing while giving Russia money and the materials, we also gave them many Sherman's and trucks that during the Invasion of Afghanistan, 1/3rd were American vehicles.
As a retired military officer, I think both of you are very able to ask pertinent and relevant questions. Your videos are informative and interesting.
The US Military destroyed the Iraqi Army in about one week,Day and night bombing ,the Iraqi at the start of the war was the forth largest Military in the world and was reduced to ruble
and it was all just to flex
This is old... Patriot missile (NOT the patriot missile defense system) carries 10 warheads, far more accurate and each independently targetable, within 9 feet accurracy...
the range is piss poor though, 70 km is not much
For defense it's pretty amazing. Why it shot down Russians hypersonic missile@@mortvald
@@ragedmayhem1Ahhh yes, must've been the work of the vampire of oddessa
@@mortvald awwww you mad baby girl by facts? It's ok. 😂 😘 Nazi Russia military is trash 😂
@@mortvald awwww you mad baby girl by facts? It's ok 🤣 😘
😂😂😂😂😂 Не дай бог американским властям и Пентагону всерьёз воспринять данное видео сравнение, Пару сотен гиперзвуковых ракет с ядерной составляющей и 🇺🇸 нет..Посейдон потом зашлифует остальное побережье.
Очередной диванный воин?😂😂😂ох и клоун конечно ,такой бред писать
@@Adgward клоун это твой любовничек Байден 😃😃😃
@@nufnuftvfuntoyssurprise395You mean trump.
You obviously don't know that the US is who first started Hypersonic, long before Russia. When the Soviet Union ended. We stopped, thinking we wouldn't need them. But not only will we do Hypersonic missles, but Hypersonic jets AGAIN ALSO.
@@russellfisher2853сейчас у сша 🇺🇸 нет гиперзвука, , всё попытки запустить ракеты были провалены.... В упадке вся промышленность, Боинг тому пример.
Vietnam is everybody's go to America lost war.
In 1973, the US and North Vietnam had the Paris peace accords where the North Vietnam recognized South Vietnam independence. The US pulled out every combat soldier that same year and began to invest heavily in the now autonomous South Vietnam economy.
The North reneged on the Paris accords and attacked small village in the North at first to see a response. Once they realized the US wasn't going to remobilize for war, they attacked the rest of South Vietnam, with Saigon eventually falling without a single US combat division in the country.
In terms of military, Vietnam was no loss!!!!!
The US has not won a war against a unified nations since WWII. Iraq and Libya the only two you could say were "victories" (if the condition of victory was destabilizing a sovereign nation and creating a regional humanitarian crisis) were NATO coalitions against fragmented countries in the middle of civil wars.
@joebenson528 Panama, first Gulf War Afghanistan and Iraq. Do your research the US military has defeated every enemy its ever came across only having a tie with Great Britiain in the war of 1812. I dare you to challenge me on this. In fact, I'm begging you, please tell me I'm wrong🙏
The US couldn't even really fight in Vietnam since China made it pretty clear that they would invade Vietnam and declare war on the US if they did. The US fought with both hands tied behind it's back and had to constantly give up captured ground and villages becouse doing too much might trigger the chinese. They also won every single major engagement in Afghanistan and made them hide in the hills for all the years it occupied that country. Saying that is a Loss is borderline lying since they were absolutely dominating the Taliban until some orange man decided to pull out before the new governement they build was ready to take over and then gave the old dementia patient a ticking time bomb that led to the evacuation of Afgahnistan. Iraq was far from a fragmented country. It was a very stable dictatorship since the dictator simply killed the opposition like putin does these days. Iraq also fought using the same tactics and equipment Russia fought with. Russia has since changed it's tactics to be closer to the american tactics since they realised they were shit. NATO tactics which are to a large extent the same as US tactics have proven very effective against Russia when employed by ukraine which is even more impressive if you consider that Ukraine is learning them on the go and without a lot of the weapons they were designed to work with. If you look throughout history you will find that russia has never been a good military. Not during the Tsars were they were beaten by Napoleon who made them hide and burn Moscow, not during WW1 where Germany beat them so hard they had a civil war, not before WW2 when they invaded finland and took massive casualties for a tiny amount of land, not during WW2 where the country would have collapsed if not for the American lend-lease and not for bad luck of the germans, not during the Cold War where the russian forces failed in Afghanistan much much harder then you think the Americans failed and basically never anytime else. They always have been shit at the art of war. Compared to Desert Storm where the opening air war is like the Mona Lisa.
@einehrenmann6156
The US never occupied Afghanistan, and the T did not "hide in the hills" they ambushed from the hills. Every city south of Kabul was in Pashtun hands since 2007.
That's why the US puppet government in Kabul capitulated within days (weeks before CNN was told by the Pentagon to report NATO's defeat). Outside of the capital, NATO had zero support. We (US) barely had support in the few public areas we "held".
@johnbattle7518
Read comments before you reply to them, shortbus. I mentioned Iraq.
The "Gulf War" was Iraq vs 27 nations. The result: Stalemate
Iraq invasion 2003 came after a civil war in the country broke out. It was 20+ NATO countries (not just the US) against Saddam and the few loyalists he had left (~50,000 RGFC). Again where is the "victory" there. All we did was waste tax dollars to create a ISIL caliphate.
The US lost in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Post-Gaddafi Libya, Somalia, The YouCrane (The "legion", Patriot/Himars systems etc are NATO forces), and pick an African country that has ousted US forces; Burkina Faso, Mali etc.
The "US President" and self-proclaimed "Joey B." is fumbling US hegemony one ice cream cone and diaper change at a time.
Our next loss will likely be Taiwan province or Korea again.
As far as nuclear missiles.
The US has spent billions of dollars upgrading our missiles constantly.
While Russia does not at all. And is not even sure if half of their missiles would even work or get where they were supposed to go. Also US missles will, and DO fly 8,000 miles. And another thing he forgot to mention is, they can hit anywhere in the world. They fly longer than the circumference of the earth. So Russia doing missles that supposedly fly 11,000 miles, is most likely Propaganda, they're having a hard time just maintaining they're Old Missles. And it wouldn't even make sense. What? they want to go 1 and a third times around the world? Lol😂
Every year, exercises are held, missiles are tested using test sites in opposite ends of the country.
The circumference of the earth at the equator is approximately 40,000 km.
Satan || : hold my beer🍹🍹
The US is 40 times larger then the UK ,plenty of space for military equipment , i dont think you realize how big the US truly is .a lot of Russia is just a polar wasteland
They don’t. These two r clueless
They definitely don’t know but they’re learning🤣🤣
A large number of the United States military assets are stored on bases around the globe
Napoleon and Hitler thought exactly like that!
@@fenderbender2096 how do you know did you ask them
And the missle distance is basically useless to mention seeing as the Earth isn't even 8000 miles in diameter. So even 6000 miles is more than enough to hit basically any target if fired the correct direction around the Earth.
True. Most likely the missiles would go over the north pole to get to each other, not the long way around the world.
you know that missiles can turn, right?
Why do we need diameter? The circumference of the earth is 40,000 km at the equator.
Use your brain a little bit, my my man.
@JOONGARIK
Yes even after it's Launched it can be turn in a different direction
Это видео сделано для зумеров и вот почему:
1. Ресурсы. Какие бы ни были у США технологии, их надо производить. В Украине СВО показало, что уже запад спорит, кто ракеты даст, тк без ресурсов китая и россии, эти ракеты и технику не из чего делать. Она просто иссякнет, а россия может играть в долгую, про это следущий пункт
2. Россия огромная страна. Ее физически не возможно победить милитаризованным путем. И россия, благодаря своим ресурсам и производству может воевать десятками лет.
3. Размер армии. Западным людям надо понять, что армия в сша контрактная. Обычного американца сейчас не заставишь пойти воевать, тк он занять придумыванием нового гендера. Но, если на россию ступит нога врага, каждый, буквально каждый мужик возмется за автомат, каждая женщина возмется за станок и даже ребенок будет заниматься производством патронов, если того потребует защита родины. Автор этого видео немного не понимает ментальность нашу и наш дух. А украинцы, они такие же как мы. Не те, что зигу кидают и фашисты, а обычные мобилизованные работяги. Такие же мужики, вот и воевать с ними сложно, потому что русские не сдаются.
As far as "On Foot" 25th infantry Division is the definition of Light Infantry as they are stationed on the Hawaiian islands. Their movement standards are every soldier must be able to march twenty miles in under four hours with their full combat load-out, BUT even 25th has a battalion of Utility helicopters and a company of Cargo helicopters. That's twenty-five of the ubiquitous 11+ passenger Blackhawks and ten 40+ passenger Chinooks. When I served with them, we could deliver 500 combat-loaded a$$-kickers anywhere within 200m (300+Kilometers) of our base with three hours notice and move 500 men 500 miles (800 kilometers) every five hours indefinitely. Light infantry doesn't have vehicles heavier than HMMWV's so they can be slung under the helicopters full of troops to bypass otherwise impassible terrain. Light infantry's biggest hindrance is ensuring the supply lines of the FARP's (forward arming and refueling point) to support follow-on air-mobile operations. We can use the Chinooks as mobile FARPs for the forward-operating elements and even move artillery to support our troops as they advance via air-transport. Each Chinook can move a FMTV (ten-ton cargo truck), a 155mm canon with its crew and ammo or huge fuel bladders and ammo supply for the attack choppers and a security force on top. A flight of Blackhawks (10 birds) can handle moving five 105mm canons, five HMMWV's to tow them with and their crews, ammo and a security force on top. Blackhawks cruise at around 220KPH and can go as fast as 300KPH. They're called Tropic Lightning for a reason. Air Assault!
HUA 1/21! “Air Assault”
If we are attacked on our own land what most fail to recognize is a lot of of citizens own numerous firearms and hunt wildlife and we love our country and will take up arms to defend country. I took 4 deer past 300 yards last year so myself and others can hit targets a long distance. I myself own 21 combined rifles and handguns. I also reload my own ammo and have 100+ ammo cans full. I am a 25 year military veteran.
And a LOT of us are veterans, battle trained and hardened
Sorry boys US military it’s just too good for any red Dawn scenario to actually happen
So what you're saying is that USA has no innocent civilians right? Kind of the way Israel said civilians were attacked, instead of saying off duty IDF military personel were attacked. Remember, Israel send everyone to military school... EVERYONE. So,hypothetically speaking it would be open season on every single person in USA? Just my curiosity
@@PlayShorts3they’d have to be active in combat.
In reality, most of the gun owners in America are in the southern states.. the north normal citizens don’t have or have never even worked a gun before… now you take into this generation.. I’d say out of our whole population here in the states… maybe 1 to 2 million men would fight… the rest would run… and in the next 5 to ten years Americans may not have guns anymore.. most the comments are talking about from 30 years ago… heck young men here are soft as shit, we have the masculinity is bad make boys feminine movement.. so no…
I have worked with a number of very good Russian engineers. The problem for Russia is that many of their best technologists leave for more lucrative jobs in the west. It is not a lack of intellect, but an inability to retain skilled people. The culture in Russia does a disservice to itself.
The brain drain always gets these types of countries in trouble
no russians are dumb and steal everything
Understandable.
Hitler defeated because his arrogant and underestimate Soviet 😂😂😂😂
The US can activate a war time production (Trup did this for Covid for ventilators and vacs), we did this in the last two world wars too, factory are payed to switch over to a military team close to what they already make, so that is what will happen, and recruiting will ramp up and all will be called in under the Draft all military age men (women too now or its being voted on, cant remember right now.) will report to designated locations for health checks and training locations if pryer serves then orders. Last I saw russian soldiers ( a teacher conscripted and some farin fighters ) where sent out with no training and no orders, ww2 guns only 4 for the squad and limited ammo, some non. Drones are then now warfare, which isn't even covered here and should be its heart breaking really.
I actually carried AT4 in Ft Irwin for our Annual combat training in the mountains of the the Mojave dessert.
But one of my squad mates had a javelin and he took down an "enemy" chopper while we were hiding in the mountains.
It is all tech based and not actual artillery fired, of course. But the targeting and hits are registered and reported back to field command to show how effective defense and attack was.
I loved those massive combat operations. It is company against company. And the largest usually at the end of the training was battalion against battalion.
Infantry leads the way!!! Hoooah!
Biggest thing that he kinda just brushed over was the 12 super carriers the US has. That is 12 ships which are able to carry 70+ aircraft each.
And on top of that they forgot about our whole ass coast guard 😂
@@Acefakeboo
The modern coast guard is not capable of fighting in a high intensity peer conflict combat. They are a glorified federal police service or DEA with small patrol ships.
The hypothetical capabilities of an Aircraft carrier is one thing, the ability to provide the resources to fulfill potential is another. The average air component of a deployed carrier during the Vietnam war never surpassed 50 due to the threat of losing so many air assets if a single ship were to sink.
And today we are severely under equipped, the existing equipment is poorly maintained (if at all), and current ammunition production is not even capable of suppling a low intensity insurgency in Afghanistan. RU produces more 152/155mm artillery shells per month (35,000) than the US produces per year (27,000). Small arms ammunitions is even more lopsided. Recently the US army announced they will increase production of 155mm shells to 28,000/month, but it will take 4 years to reach that mark. RU has not even ramped up to war capacity yet (70,000/month). The RU backed DPR and LPR forces are firing more artillery shells per day than all of NATO combined produces.
1,000 tanks with 1,000 shells is going to lose to 500 tanks with 5,000 shells. Given the results of the Ukr civil war, those 500 tanks could take out 2,000 tanks and that's with DEVGRU and CAG ATGM teams operating within Ukr against DPR and LPR *militiamen* (not RU ground forces).
just HUGE targets for todays hypersonic missiles and drones
Aint ship missles will smoke them
It was a soviet scientist that actually figured out the equations for stealth aircraft technology. The US just implemented the initial soviet research and dramatically refined it to what it is today....
Russia's navy wouldn't last 30 seconds against America's navy. 12 nuclear super carriers vs. one old Russian carrier that runs on crude oil.
You mean American carriers sinking after getting wrecked by random iceberg while Russians would be chilling with nuclear icebreakers (which only Russia has).
Are you really sure about that I thought it was vodka😂😂😂
If it's so simple, why hasn't the US attacked Russia? Why hasn't the "almighty" U.S. Army invaded Russia yet? After all, Russia is labeled by America as its number one enemy, which supposedly threatens the existence of the US. Why isn't Russia still in ruins like Iraq, Libya or Yugoslavia, to which the Americans brought "democracy" by carpet bombing, flattening entire cities with civilians in those countries? Maybe because the U.S. knows that in such an eventuality it can get a big backlash? Why does Russia, which according to this video has decrepit military equipment and a paltry military force, produce more weapons per month for the war in Ukraine than all NATO countries combined? This is not Russian propaganda, but the conclusion of Western politicians and analysts. Why did Russia, with an economy that was supposedly torn to shreds, stand up to the sanctions and establish its own production, at the same time orienting its market to Asia? Moreover, it ranked fifth among the world's largest economies. Again, these are not my words, but an IMF report. So if Russia were such a pathetic country as such propaganda videos claim, the U.S. would not miss the opportunity to attack Russia. Why? Because it's very easy and convenient to attack the weak, they can't fight back. Libya and Yugoslavia will not let you lie about that.
The fleet in the current realities cannot play a big role when it is applied to strong countries like Russia. Maybe 50 years ago the fleet played a significant role, but now that Russia (and not only Russia) has Kinzhal hypersonic missiles in its arsenal, the entire US fleet can be easily reset and the Russian fleet will not be needed for this, and the US government knows about it.
Дурачок ты! Зачем много флота ли оружия? Если есть одна ракета и от твоего хвалёного флота ни останется и мокрого места!🤣 Так же как и от вашей пендосовской страны! Так что живи и молись своему богу чтоб ваши тупые политики не начали эту войну! Ибо ты если она начнётся к сажалению и к большой вероятности даже об этом и не узнаешь! 😂
As a Army Veteran, USA can land troops with Blackhawks not just Bradley fighter vehicles or Hum Vs and trucks that can hold 30 + soldiers
America has so much military stuff because of our GDP. Please remember America is very much like 50 smaller countries acting as one. Each individual state strives for financial success. That generates an enormous amount of money to buy a big military. You meantioned storing all the military hardware. America is covered in military bases. All branches of the military have many bases all over the country. I believe the Marine Base called 29 Palms in California is as big as the greater London metropolitain area. We have many bases that size. Our Naval fleets are so big they are a vital income for several large cities with Navy bases. (San Diego, Norfolk etc) Dozens and dozens of bases that are several square miles in size. Storing 300,000 vehicles isnt tough at all. Lol
Same general that failed in Iraq how can you defeat Russia learn your history typical American 😂
@@Fhkky failed to do what in Iraq? fing idiot
@@Fhkky learn to read real news instead of what's being pooped out of Putin's butthole
Small countries really. England fits in one of our 50 states Louisiana and England is Small than 31 of our 50 states. Its 4,509 kilometers across America. Come on, you have never driven 18 hours to get to grandma's house lol
During President Eisenhower's presidency during the Cold War, he told the Soviet Union that if they dropped nuclear bomb on an American City he would turn every major City into a charcoal bricket!
Дайвай, потыкай палкой в медведя, что может пойти не так? Сначала нам немножечко страшно, а потом становится похуй, а когда нам похуй - страшно становится всем.
Им объяснять нет смысла, они на чужих ошибках не учатся.
You ok bro
@@akejiaThat's true, you don't but we understand.
It's okay.
She is correct about subsidiary companies being the better option. If the state tells you to build weapons, you do as your told. If you have healthy competition between multiple companies they will innovate and bring the newest technology.
December 07, 1941 the Imperial Japenese Navy woke the sleeping giant by attacking Pearl Harbour Naval Base. The United States has never looked back.
But houties block all😂😂😂
@@bojanvukobradovic2504 no, not really.
@@bojanvukobradovic2504 You obviously don't keep up with current wars.
You guys were wondering about how and where these assets are kept. If you google and get through dated stats, Bragg/Liberty on the Army side is still the largest. Naval/Marine corps will pop up. Also, Naval yards and many Airstation's tend to be coastal. Not all. Same for the Air Force... But for the stockpiles and whatever questions or concerns... they're located all over the continental US. I think it's worth mentioning the sizes of certain training areas/proving grounds for each branch as they take up an amazing amount of land or acreage too.
I’m an American. But I’m humble enough to recognize that Russia has hypersonic delivery systems to deliver nuclear weapons. If Russia were to do a surprise nuclear strike on America and our navy, we would be screwed.
I think you're one of the many who has a brain here.
Russia's Hypersonic missiles have been shot down by the United States Patriot missile systems over Ukraine
U thinknthe usa doesnt have the same if not way better missile systems? ( offense and defenseive systems?
@Adam-nb3zp no it doesn't. If you do show us. Again stop falling fkr the hype
@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 HACM which they are equipped in the new F22 rebuild
A generalization but Having private companies produce weapons during peacetime means on-going competition which means on-going innovation including production efficiencies. Once a large war breaks out, all the companies shift into production mode.
Don’t forget about the will to fight as well. Russia would have a large number of conscripted soldiers while the US has a voluntary service backed up by the National Guard and recent ex servicemen that can be called upon, before ever even having to use the Draft Act to raise additional troops. A lot of the facilities in the US can be turned from manufacturing industrial equipment to military equipment and hardware in a relatively short time period. This along with the fact the the US spends more on its military budget than like the next 6-8 countries combined. Beyond that the group that holds the most firearms is the US citizens. A lot of which grew up hunting, firing ranges tournaments and similar activities. Good luck to who ever would decide to FAFO. Now some hick with a 30-30 isn’t going to do any good against a nuke, but, other than the nuke aspect….FAFO
that girl is nice....she need to be in Russia bro
Russian navy is definitely not bigger same thing with the Chinese navy they count skiffs and speedboats as naval vessels
we saw US aid to Ukraine, it’s still funny :))
The fleet in the current realities cannot play a big role when it is applied to strong countries like Russia. Maybe 50 years ago the fleet played a significant role, but now that Russia (and not only Russia) has Kinzhal hypersonic missiles in its arsenal, the entire US fleet can be easily reset and the Russian fleet will not be needed for this, and the US is good about this know
As far as replacing military ammunition parts, tanks, ships jets planes helicopters, missiles. This Storyteller, fed you a crock of cr_p. I really can't help but wonder if Russia was behind this. LOL Just think about WW2. The US turned so many factories into making military parts, plane tanks bombs ships We made our military everything we needed. Made most of England's, and also supplied RUSSIA, with money, and tons of their military things they needed. They may have lost to Germany, without US help. The US made thousands of ships tanks planes artillery, rifles, jeeps trucks, ammo, bombs. Every thing we needed, and thousands for other countries, to win the war. All of are military supplies by Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrup, and all of our defense companies, and many more companies, would immediately get on board, and start production of military items. And other companies that could help would. Even if they didn't, they could be ordered to. As far as him saying Russia could replace everything so easily, and fast, is a joke. Right now they're losing military equipment daily with the War in Ukraine. And they cannot replace a ton of what they lost. A lot of the reason is they import a ton of parts, computer chips and other things from the US, and around the world, for their military components. Some of these, they don't have the knowledge for, and or factories. 😂
In the computer industry, there is a saying, bad data in equals bad data out, and this video you are reacting to, is bad data. The video obviously has a goal of entertaining, using suspense and playing loose with logic and facts to create that entertainment. It is horrible information for it purposefully misinforms and misdirects, or at least I hope that is behind why they are so horribly wrong about their positions, because the opposite would mean they are just that ignorant. The US typically reduces the performance stats of its capabilities by greater than 20%, in order to retain some elements of surprise as well as keep the other countries from knowing where the limits are for which they can either build to take advantage of or strategize to maximize their positions. Most other countries overstate their capabilities to create the image that they are more capable than they are, this is to intimidate and keep aggressors in check having to deal with this extra capability.
An example is the SU-57 & J-20 aircraft. Russia and China make the claims in their reveals that these aircraft are 5th Gen aircraft more advanced and capable than the US's F-22, let alone the most produced 5th Gen aircraft ever, the F-35. When these aircraft are actually produced and deployed, it becomes very evident that they lack stealth, supercruise, and even at times, advanced electronics. The Indian Air Force has routinely spotted the J-20 at ranges greater than 60miles, and the J-20's engines are so weak, that the Chinese are forced to buy their engines from Russia even after spending billions trying to develop its own domestic source, and even still with the Russian engines (the same, if not slightly less advanced, that are in the SU-35) they are unable to achieve supercruise and have severely limited their ranges & usages as ship-based aircraft. With the current corruption scandals in Chinese Defense, it is questioned just how capable the J-20's electronics & weapons systems are for we see how badly overhyped other weapon systems and electronics are in the Russian version or similar systems, with 4th gen aircraft easily making it through air defense systems, easily countering air to air and ground to air systems, and how badly the naval defense systems are in comparative to their western counterparts.
Russia is in a worse position than China is, in that China at least has an advanced electronics industry, capable of making chips and other tech hardware even if not the most advanced like the US, S. Korea, Taiwan, or Japan. Russia has to import all its electronic tech equipment, which is currently highly limited due to sanctions. Russia doesn't control GPS signals, so it created a counterpart, but the problem there is that they only have a few satellites capable of being used in the Russian version of GPS. China is limited by this same issue. The US simply shuts off the GPS signals to Russian & Chinese weapon systems and these powerful militaries get defanged to being only slightly better than the 1960s requiring large amounts of sorties to achieve the same results that a single US weapon system delivers in a single sortie. It also limits viewing the battle space and knowing what is actually happening at any one moment. China has missile capabilities to attack US bases at Guam and US Naval forces in the Indian Ocean, South China Sea, & Pacific Ocean, but it only has satellite coverage of these spaces for minutes every day, an absolute must for its weapon system to even hope for an attack on the US Naval forces. Within hours, the US could render China completely blind to what is beyond its shores effectively removing these weapon systems from being effective. Russia is in a worse position, relying on over-the-counter civilian tech, and Chinese sharing of information. Meanwhile, the US has an entire department in its Defense devoted to war in space, from space and to space...The US Space Force.
Apparently you have not known Russia and China for a long time, you are stuck in the 90s. Technology has long gone ahead in Russia and China. Russia does not use GPS. Refresh your data
@@МаксАнтонов-м5о Russian is so pathetic, they had to star buying Starlink in Urkain so they could even get food to the front line lol
"the su 57 which they claim is better than anything america has to offer." Then proceeds to talk about the f35, completely disregarding the fact that the su57 isn't even STEALTH, and the f22 Raptor is still the most dominant aircraft in use. I can't take this video seriously.
You realize the data/ tech they refer to is " public" and that is as least 5 to ten years out of date .
@@bobbombar6711 I understand where you're coming from and appreciate the assist, but the f22 is still stealth where as the su57 is not. The f22's data that has been made public still shows it being superior. It's not like it has regressed in the last 5-10 years.
Also, I'm aware this is just a react channel and I'm merely speaking on the video that they are reacting to.
@kabrotherrepeat true but for example the a- 10 can online / joined yhe flee in the 70's granted they just got some upgrades but w.t.f.
Same for the f- 16 .
So you see my point ,granted this video does touch on rusdias loses in Ukraine.
But at the same time they don't have as many large surfaces vessels .
Also they didn't even touch on the use of drones even though they have been in use for well over 20 + years
@@bobbombar6711 exactly, that's why I said I couldn't take it seriously 😇. The video, although entertaining is missing a lot of key data points. Giving Russia more credit than they deserve lol.
@@kabrotherrepeat you think the would do basic research at least.
OK, think about this, the REASON why the U.S. does not run it's own government owned and controlled munitions factories, is simple, WHERE do you imagine the BEST source of innovation and IDEAS would come from? some government employee who just wants to do his/her job and make a living, or a private company who wants to develop the next great things to improve their profits? the REASON why the U.S. is so far ahead in tech, is that we keep the damned government out of weapons technology and development, and that factory that makes Russian munitions, guess what would be on the top 10 list of places to be leveled if it came to a shooting war with Russia?
trust me the us funds the hell out of their top defence contractors
Foreign aid is another word for funding weapon contractors.
The earth's diameter is only 7,926 miles, so why would you plan to loop the earth before hitting your target. So at 4,000 miles, you could hit any target on the planet, at 8,000 miles you could circumnavigate the earth and hit yourself. So, what use is 14,000 miles? The moon is 238,900 miles away, so that's not their target, which Russia would know if they had ever been there.
It is immediately obvious that you had a bad geometry at school... Arc length and diameter are different things... The surface of the earth is more than 40,000 kilometers, while the diameter is 12,000 kilometers
and besides, the missiles fly at some altitude, which multiplies the required range
28:30 its called private industry innovation..its how WW2 was won buddy
Russia and America would make a great team. I've never understood why our governments can't see the other side of a unified front.
Just going to make this clear right now, even if Russia, WITH all of its allies faced the U.S. by itself in an attempt to invade, they would fail miserably today. The main defensive strength of the U.S. isn't its military strength, but its geography. There's a few videos that explain this fairly well. I suggest you check some of them out. Would make for great reaction content too.
The part of this video I heavily disagree with is Russia's potential advantage in naval forces. There is NO WAY Russia or any other nation could contend with the U.S. Full stop. Its not even something that should be entertained. Americas power projection over the world is due to its naval capability more than anything. The next 10 countries combined aren't as large or powerful as the U.S. Navy. Its a joke to even compare the two, same with the Airforce. We have complete dominance because of those two things alone. If nuclear weapons were completely out of the picture, the U.S. could conquer any nation in the world within a week by conventional warfare standards. (i.e. no guerilla warfare).
We also change the production of factories like car, and tractor manufacturers. But a lot of other manufacturers as well. During WWII we were making 10K each of tanks, planes, ships, weapons, and ammo. We were supplying the world with weapons.
What this video doesn’t explain, how heavily defended each coast region is, the sheer size of the us mainland(most Europeans have zero clue) and most importantly how the US military doctrine works. Every single branch is specifically designed and structured to support and work with the others down to the lowest level. Infantry support tanks, tanks supported by helicopters etc. check out the video of the us liberation of Kuwait and invasion of Iraq. Shows how truly effective the US is at dismantling air defense and ground units with the same equipment Russia still fields.
The video does not reflect even a tenth of the power of the Russian Ground Forces. Javelin turned out to be shit, but the Russian anti-tank guided missiles, on the contrary, were on top. The BMP-3 is equipped not only with a 30-mm automatic cannon, but also with a 100-mm artillery gun, not counting anti-tank guided missiles. Russian small ships are capable of launching Kalibr cruise missiles, but the Americans can only launch Tomahawk cruise missiles from large ships. The presence of Russian sea-based hypersonic missiles "Zircon" simply makes American aircraft carriers useless junk - they will be guaranteed to be destroyed, because the Americans have nothing to shoot down Russian hypersonic missiles. In short, the video is COMPLETELY devoid of objectivity. And if Russia is such a technologically backward country, then why do Americans fly into space on Russian space rocket engines?
Keep in mind the US is HUGE - we have huge military bases all over the lower 48 . . Each part of our military (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard) have their own military bases - again these bases are enormous! Plenty of room for ground force equipment and vehicles! What is funny, if you come to America -- you will never see these bases unless you make it a mission to go to that base - which you can go there - but you will not get on base without proper clearance etc..
Also Alaska and Hawaii have bases.
And those bases started to get fired in Africa 😂😂😂😂
All you need to know is the US has fought and won multiple wars across the globe, and can famously deploy expeditionary forces anywhere on Earth within 24hr, Russia has not, and cannot. In fact, Russia is struggling to conduct a war right on their own doorstep. Ukraine is managing to fend off Russia with US hand-me-downs, the same tech the US used to defeat Iraq in the first Gulf War in 1991. Imagine what we have now that's classified? It's not a matter of "could", it's more a matter of "would". Meaning the capability is there, but does the US have the WILL to use it is the only real question.
If Russia didn't have nukes they'd have no seat at the table at all.
Not 24 hours. 48 hours. Still impressive of course but 24 hours is not true
@@trevor3013 umm thats 100 percent true lmao do some research. our airborne can be dropped anywhere on this planet within 24 hours
The United States sure don’t have a lot to show for even with all of this superiority 🤣. Afghanistan beat Russia and the United States with not even a fraction of the capabilities. The United States haven’t won a true 100% since WW2 and that wasn’t even fought by themselves. The United States leaders obviously knows things you keyboard warriors don’t. If the United States have classified things what makes you think Russia and other countries don’t?😂
US never fought near peer adversary 1 VS 1 since end of WW2, in both world wars Europeans did most of job (americans always showed up to the end of party.)
In Vietnam and Korea Americans failed the instant Chinese and Soviets started to project part of their might on the region.
You are also not capable of deploying forces anywhere if other countries wont allow if, it's feat of 30 countries, not USA.
Do you think you guys magically teleported to Iraq? I have to remind you that if not for Europeans, Australians and Saudi's - Americans wouldn't be able to do something as much as land in Iraq.
"Russia is struggling to conduct a war right on their own doorstep"
Russia is fighting a country that by 2022 was second strongest nation in Europe, second largest nation in Europe, and is now backed finances, military, tech and intel wise by largest military and economical alliances in human history + while being under largest package of sanctions in history.
And despite this, they are still kicking your a&s through Ukraine.
"Ukraine is managing to fend off Russia with US hand-me-downs"
Except they dont, as Ukraine's air forces stopped existing in few weeks in 2022 and majority of current Ukrainian military tech is not even Ukrainian.
Ukraine's economy is also reduced to an IOU and is artificially put on life support by EU and NATO funds counting in hundred of billions, all of that just to allow Ukraine to exist.
By the way USA never even fought a single nation 1 VS 1 as strong as Ukraine was in 2022, absolutely hilarious.
"the same tech the US used to defeat Iraq in the first Gulf War in 1991. Imagine what we have now that's classified? "
Clearly nothing seeing how you guys freaked out when Russians presented hypersonic missiles in 2018, you freaked out so much in fact that you left middle ranged missiles treaty, clearly indicating that USA has no way to counter those things.
"but does the US have the WILL to use it is the only real question. "
Americans dont have neither the will nor finances to do that, you are barely coping with 30 trillion debt while trying to fund both Ukraine and Israel at once, and those aren't even actual war fronts, what you plan to do with Russians is unknown to me seeing how you wont get any kind of air superiority over Russians.
The US has won wars against countries like Iraq, that's all you need to know.
In times of war, the President can order companies like General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, and Catapiller to retool and make weapons of war almost immediately. During WWII we did that and supplied all our allies with vehicles, planes, tanks and ships to combat Italy Germany and Japan. After WWII the US was so powerful we could have taken over the whole world. Europe was devastated with almost total destruction. Japan controlled much of Asia but thanks to a couple of nukes was pretty much a wreck. China was in bad shape and so was at least a third of Russia. The US was the only nation untouched, except for Pearl Harbour which is a very small area.
We were producing 10k each of the following per year, tanks, planes, artillery, thousands of ships and untold amounts of ammo. We supplied Russia, Asia, and Europe with clothing, food, water, and countless othe things. We're very good at logistics as well. After the war we became the most powerful country on earth. Our factories were untouched. Where European and Asian factories were bombed to bits. General Motors, who makes Chevrolet, Buick, Cadillac and GMC sold 53% of the cars in the world, then you had Ford and Chrysler picking up what GM couldn't. WE WERE " BAD TO THE BONE" at the time. Europe and Asia didn't really become able to export to the US until the mid-1950s and that wasn't much. It took until the late 1960s until Japan exported its first cars to the US. The Toyota Corolla and Corona. Now everything is pretty much global in north America, Europe and Asia.
Don't forget that Canada was also untouched and sent troops and resources during WWII, as well. Australia and the Philippines were also needed to fight against Japan, as Japan tried to invade there too.
You all probably don't know who liberated the whole of Europe and stormed Berlin
The weapon Iran used was a silkworm missile. This is the tsar bomb I believe
Russia has a brown water fleet the United States has a well seasoned blue water fleet
As an US Army vet who left the US Army in 2020 I have no doubt that the US will beat Russia in one on one
😂😂😂
😂
Взаимное уничтожение ядерным оружием это победа?
@@cybernegr no it’s not a victory. I wouldn’t suggest the use of nuclear weapons. It’s a dumb and useless weapon and if used everyone would die in both sides
@cybernegr because Russian would be the one using it because they couldn't win a conventional fight
Ребят, это не данные, это мусор какой то. Изучайте официальные данные.
Quality (USA) over Quantity (Poor Russia)
Российские гепер звуковые ракеты Кинжал могут вывести из строя весь флот США. НЕ одна система ПВО не сможет перехватить эти ракеты. Нужда во флоте не актуальна когда есть такие ракеты
Будь помягче, для американцев будет тяжело понять, что весь их хвалёный флот можно обнулить парой десятков кинжалов)
The US can, and already has.😂
I love your fresh, almost naive , understanding of military forces. just for starters:
1) Any future war will first be waged using cyber.
2)Technology and Training will overcome any disadvantage in number of equipment or personnel.
3)The combat forces of the United States; infantry, artillery, special operations, fighter pilots, bomber pilots and naval vessels (aircraft carriers, destroyers, subs) are itching for an opportunity to use their training. Never underestimate young US servicemembers who are fueled by caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, and hate.
4)There are United States Military bases EVERYWHERE. The US has troops, equipment, naval assets, aircraft etc. in any place the US has deemed to be critical to defend (if not, they can have assets there withing 24hrs). There is no need to wait for troops and supplies to be sent over to stop an invasion. There are already forces ready to rock.
While the quote has been claimed to be bogus it is true, everyday Americans would not allow our coutry to be invaded. Japan’s Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto as saying: "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." So for russia to try to ivade would not go well for them.
If you want to see a hreat video on innovation check out videos on the SR-71 Blackbird.
American companies bring multiple designs and specifications....... the US Government selects a design and improves the design.
This is why American innovation is top notch, it forces companies come up with their best ideas in exchange to win Government contracts.
Russia having more infantry just means more funerals. That’s not an advantage.
tell that to emma with two moms. hAHAHAHHAHHA
Russians have more men, experience, and are basically g&ds of artillery.
Which mean Americans would be wrecked in land battles, because you guys are absolutely not having any kind of air superiority over Russians, Russia is not Syria and your stealth bombers are created from theories of Soviet researcher titled as "father of stealth" to begin with.
Good luck with your Call of Duty fantasies.
@@SAMOYLOVP87 good one😀😀😀😀
As an American I can say we would never let someone over take us with numbers we would just spend and recruit more. Russia can call on every citizen and increase tax by 100% and still fall short
People outside of America love to make fun of us, but one of the explicit things our governed states is that we can go pretty much adjutant and we will be protected. That isn't possible for any other country.
That is why the Americans got out of gaza almost immediately after the tragic events. We have that freedom
You are protected by NATO if not allies you are the same as other country but wait you will not be able to invade other countries anymore if brics make alliance
The M2A2 Bradley was specifically designed to combat the soviet BMP.
The Iranian missile you thought was the Satan II was actually the Silkworm Missile that the USA told Iran would be a declaration of war if they ever used. Also, another point not mentioned in thee video, you can have as many planes, tanks and boats/ships as you want, the manpower needed to be there is not there for Russia. Putin thinks that if they have more equipment, if a piece gets destroyed they can just move the operator to a new piece of equipment. Fact is, the US military does not attack the piece of equipment, as much as it aim to take out both the equipment AND the operator. Great reaction by the way!
And dont forget that in Russian nuckear doktrin we have that thing that called nuclear anti-marine fight. And nuclear submarines that bear 16 nuclear warhead can use them to fight against massive US navi. It can be a chance but if this happen one russian submarine can nuke big fleet.
THE AMERICAN AIRFORCE WOULD CRUSH THE RUSSIAN NAVY BEFORE IT COULD GET ANYWHERE NEAR MAINLAND AMERICA.
Да ну! Не смеши меня ! Разебут вас в фарш!
The biggest issue Russia has, is one aircraft carrier, so how do they get aircraft where they need to be in order to fight the US? The US has 13 aircraft carriers. When you control the air you you control the fight
US can launch a global attack Russia can’t. US can fight multiple different wars all at once and Russia cannot plus US tech is like 30 years ahead of Russia.
What different wars? You haven't been able to decide for months whether to allocate money to help Ukraine, Israel or Taiwan. And soon you'll be passing a budget that you've blown up to unbelievable proportions. Stop meddling in the affairs of other countries, you were not invited. Take care of your own internal problems instead of proxy wars and overthrowing governments 10000 km away from your territories.
@@ivpr4264 Who is tf is “You” ? Get your weird ahh on some where. US is helping them all they can do that unlike a lot of other countries, Biden is also sending 95 billion dollars to Ukraine so talk about what you know what you think. We’d be in WW3 right now if US didn’t interfere in most of these wars by now.
@@ivpr4264 Who is tf is “You” ? Get your weird ahh on some where. US is helping them all they can do that unlike a lot of other countries, Biden is also sending 95 billion dollars to Ukraine so talk about what you know what you think. We’d be in WW3 by now if US didn’t interfere in most of these wars so stop thinking your so smart.
@@ivpr4264 Taiwan literally has a treaty with US for them to help them and Israel is an ally of America. Biden is sending 95 billion dollars to Ukraine after sending 45 billion last year so talk about the facts.
@@ivpr4264 Who is tf is “You” ? Get your weird ahh on some where. US is helping them all they can do that unlike a lot of other countries, Biden is also sending 95 billion dollars to Ukraine so talk about what you know what you think. We’d be in WW3 by now if US didn’t interfere in most of these wars so stop thinking your so smart.
Maintenance for the equipment maybe a bigger deciding factor. Russian Command corruption in buying substandard parts, if they buy them at all, would play a factor. US last I was in the Army and stories I keep hearing, places special emphasis on maintaining all Army equipment. From tanks and Jets, all the way to the individual Soldiers gas mask.
There's also the need for replacement components for maintenance. Many use components that were imported to Russia before the sanctions. The U.S. shouldn't have difficulty in getting needed components.
Japan is US ally with US f-35 air superiority stealth aircraft. and the US has its' own airforce in japan airbases
F-22 upgraded version is far more superior than F-35 that's one secret behind US sold and deploy so many F-35 to allies countries and not F-22
The Free Enterprise on capitalism create competition among the weapons manufacturers
Government ran weapon production was Germany's downfall in World War 2. Putting all your eggs in one basket is never a good idea... Private companies produce competition, hence better Innovation.
In Germany, military equipment was produced by private companies, Hugo Boss - uniforms, Bayer AG - chemical weapons, Siemens Apparate und Maschinen GmbH - many components for various equipment, Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMW) - cars, motorcycles, Daimler-Benz (Mercedez-Benz) - engines for airplanes, tanks and submarines, Porsche - cars, self-propelled artillery, tried to make tanks.
Even if China joined Russia, both could not stop the US--that's assuming the US's own allies wouldn't get into it (which they would!) The US has 12 aircraft carriers, each one with a mobile airforce armed with nuclear and conventional weapons. The US could park 2 carriers off the coasts of Russia and China and still have plenty remaining to defend the homeland and its allies.
Russia's one carrier, is a 70 year old diesel boat that can't move without tugboats and China has like 4 carriers, so perspective is key here.
Now someone will say oh hypersonic missiles! Yes, the ones Patriot missiles are shooting down all over Ukraine. Russia loves to oversell its tech.
The U.S citizens love America so much, that any and every American would pick up arms to defend our country.
Well… there’s a good portion of the younger generation in which this doesn’t apply to unfortunately
You're not defend your own country but you attack other countries, don't use "defend our country" If your purpose is just to attack other countries. Anywhere, Russia is top 2 strongest military, so it's not easy as you think to beat even invade them, once you over the crosses against them, they would not hesitate to attack your country(well, Russia has more nuclear boms than US, so be careful) .
The boasting of the United States will one day play a cruel joke on them. They have already forgotten that they lost the war to the peasants in slippers in Afghanistan and are discussing how they will fight the FIRST (not the second) army of the world. I will give you some figures from open sources. In the United States, out of 86 Pentagon ammunition factories, only 6 remain, and only 1 of them in Ohio produces 300,000 NATO caliber shells per year. In the USA, only 1 tank factory in Lima, Ohio produces 12 abrams per year. The F-35 project is closed. During several years of stagnation, when the F-16 production line was moved from Fort Worth, Texas to Greenville, South Carolina, production of these aircraft was discontinued. In 2023, 6 aircraft were produced. By about 2025, we will produce 4 new F-16s per month or 48 per year, Lockheed Martin Corporation told Defence24 its plans. For comparison, Russia produced in 2023 4.5 million artillery shells, 150 Iskander complexes. 1300 self-propelled artillery units, about 1300 multiple rocket launchers, 1.5 thousand new and upgraded tanks, as well as more than 2.5 thousand armored combat vehicles of various types, 2,518 infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers. 100 planes and 150 helicopters.In general, Russia surpassed the United States and the EU in the production of weapons by 7 times.
the reason we don't "own" our arms industry, is for Innovation and competition, we make. These companies compete against each other, bringing their best technology that they can muster. Creating superior technologies But during war time, like World War 2. These companies are under a special invocation clause, meaning at any point the President can deem these companies. "Non private" so to say, making them ramp up weapons production. This is how we were able to supply the allies during the world war 2
Not just our country. The US military protects the world's oceans, Europe, and every other ally we have. Including Pakistan oddly enough. Would be nice if other countries helped more, maybe we could get free healthcare 😮
US's privatized military industry is mostly do to Capitalist free market. The private sector acts as competition in hiring talented people the government may want on their pay roll. And most of the private companies have non military products that they could stop producing. I have no doubt the US government would be throwing around plenty of money for the private sector leading up to and during a war with another major country.
The US is powerful, but being a superpower has responsibility not to pick fights. We have people from all over the world, so you dont want to attack a country & cause unrest at home.
Russia would not contemplate initiating an attack on America. All we have to do is recall the historical events from World War Il, when Japan attempted a similar strategy the outcome was catastrophic. It has been said that the difference between Russia and Japan lies in potential consequences. Furthermore, it makes no sense for Russia to dispatch small patrol vessels to target America; such an act would be considered suicidal. They would not succeed. Furthermore, I highly doubt Russia's submarine capabilities are close to Americas. It should be clear who we would most likely believe as being the more powerful nation a country like America that has consistently demonstrated its abilities and can back it up, or a country like russia, whose military turned out to be more disappointing than we thought.
I wonder, did the video take into account the U.S. Coast Guard ships as well as the Navy ships? Since the Coast Guard is under Homeland Security and not the military they could have been missed. They're supposed to be able to be transferred to Navy command in the event of a war. I wonder if they'd be any help or not.
Your brain is ravaged by propaganda :) What wars has the US won? WW2? No, it's the Russians, so tell me? Look at Ukraine (NATO) and its 5 mobilizations in the Russian meat grinder, hypersonic kinzals will make the entire US Navy obsolete, you have to wake up man, 52 countries in a hybrid war against Russia and see the result!
Angels exist in your heart. They burn your soul if you don’t let travel through your body.
4:12 "Nobody mocks the USA" What about Afghanistan, Iran, Yemen, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, Syria, Libya, and so on.?
I mean...even though the USA didnt have an end game, all those countries, except for Iran so far, have been left in total devastation. So...basically the USA just got tired of winning.subdoing those nations and moved on. All those governments got wasted/replaced, and the countries left in ruin and made 3rd world for the next several decades.
Add another comment for why reach would be important for pilots: When flying at the speeds these craft fly and the G-Force from the maneuvers, not to mention how tightly you are strapped in, you don't have the freedom to move your body. If you can't reach something it is not as simple as leaning forward because you are being pushed into your seat with the force of 8x your normal gravity. There are very strict height requirements as well because though I don't know if the seats are adjustable at all, they most definitely do not move a lot. On top of all this, you have to be a certain weight to safely eject when things go wrong. There are hundreds of regulations, but one of the biggest factors is will power. The selection process is brutal, and only the best of the class make it to some of these machines.
In War conditions, he US is able to take over companies for the war effort
Conoco Oil fields. 40 US soldiers with 100 oil workers defeated 200 Russians commanding 500 Syrian Militia.
Russia has more ships , but most are non combat ready or outdated. Thatd be like Germany saying they got 10,000 tanks , but 8,000 are WW2 panzer tanks, that wouldn't last 5 minutes against modern tanks.
The author of this video is wrong. While Russia might have more range, intercontinental missiles can circumnavigate the Earth through a high earth orbit. Every city in Russia is within range of US missiles. This also didn't take USA's strategic bombers like the B2 or our subs. They didn't discuss it because they were making an effort to not make it so one sided. Russia's equipment, including tanks, is also out of date. Russia is not built to do much except ground invasions and naval defense. Russian ships also routinely break down and have to towed back to port. Many don't even leave port
You think Russia invaded Ukraine and expected NATO to be included and not upgrade their weapons you're funny😂😂
No one else compares to the USA Tech wise 30 years ahead.. and this is just the Tech we know about just think what the USA has that we don't know about... Dooom lol
30 years is kind even when dealing with the chinese and russian knock offs. That is why the taiwan microchip issue is such a problem.
The minuteman 3 is the icbm of America. The weapons on the U.S. submarines are Titan 2 missles and have a range of over 13000km. It caries 8x 475 kiloton warheads each. Each warhead is about 80x more powerful than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Nuclear war between the 2 countries would pretty much end life as we know it. No matter where you live.
The Russian Navy is larger if you include bath tub boats
If u google it the US has the most powerful navy and most war ships with better tech. In size Russia and China are bigger but not in power.
You should check out videos about the logistics of the US military transportation system.
He forgot we have the national guard, their base is in every state.
The most interesting technology the US has now is laser weapons on their ships.