UL Tests Storage Rack Fire in Facility

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 дек 2024

Комментарии • 13

  • @stevendinkins2613
    @stevendinkins2613 9 лет назад +1

    Great test.. The sprinklers saved the building and the surrounding products... But around this area were there higher temp sprinklers... there is no need for in rack sprinklers.

  • @elliepupper
    @elliepupper 15 лет назад

    The boxes were actually filled with Group A plastic cups, and not Class III paper cups.

  • @JB91710
    @JB91710 5 лет назад

    Yes, cardboard boxes and paper cups will burn. Now, what was the suppression system?

  • @BenjaminEsposti
    @BenjaminEsposti 6 лет назад +1

    What is the point of the fan? Wouldn't that interfere with the test, or is it a test to see the effects of the fire with an added draft in the building?

    • @hedgeearthridge6807
      @hedgeearthridge6807 5 лет назад

      Because some warehouses have fans, idiot

    • @francotarsitano7361
      @francotarsitano7361 4 года назад

      Fire Sprinkler Automatic Extinguisher dry chemical ABC each unit covering 40 sqft installed on ceiling would suppress that fire with No pipes plumbing electrical or water. For the most effective affordable less damaging suppression Fire Sprinkler System using the Fire Sprinkler Automatic Extinguishers visit www.thefiresprinklerco.com

  • @davedoherty9399
    @davedoherty9399 12 лет назад +1

    surely rack protection would have had the fire contained in the early stages,rather than the esfr heads????

  • @lipox2011
    @lipox2011 12 лет назад

    Y, nunca se activaron las alarmas o que paso...??? o la prueba era quemar por quemar...!!!

  • @ncc1701chris
    @ncc1701chris 9 лет назад +3

    somone open a window for this guy at 3:35.

  • @JackSinger
    @JackSinger 12 лет назад

    Because of the smoke

  • @clipelectronicaetp8381
    @clipelectronicaetp8381 10 лет назад

    La prueba no resulta, sin haber tenido en perfecto estado los dispositivos y sensores contra-incendios