How to turn FILM into DIGITAL PHOTOS

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
  • How to scan rolls of film and turn them into digital photos.
    Film Scanner: geni.us/9pLs
    ✨ 2 Months Free of Artlist on an Annual Plan: bit.ly/3GshKNA
    📷 My Cameras and Lenses
    My Camera: geni.us/t93yc
    B-Camera: geni.us/AGCanonR6
    My Favorite Lens: geni.us/RF15-35mm
    Lens 1: geni.us/RF24105mm
    Lens 2: geni.us/RF70-2...
    Lens 3: geni.us/RF2470
    Drone: geni.us/0NF33v
    Stabilizer: geni.us/DL9f8G
    Microphone: geni.us/SwPS
    ND Filters: geni.us/82KFVND
    My favorite memory cards: geni.us/b2r4ya
    My Camera Bag: geni.us/ya83bN
    🎵 My MUSIC:
    Artlist (2 Months Free): bit.ly/3GshKNA
    ✨Best Entry Level Cameras:✨
    kit.co/Anthony...
    📸 INSTAGRAM: / gugliotta.one
    ♪ TIKTOK: / blameanthony
    🌐 WEBSITE: gugliotta.one
    🎞️ STOCK FOOTAGE:
    Artgrid (2 Months FREE): bit.ly/3I3LDEh
    Perfect for your Video Projects!
    📹 VIDEO ASSETS & TEMPLATES:
    Motion Array: bit.ly/3Fkwg8I
    Great for Overlays, Titles and More!
    📷 MY GEAR
    All of my Gear Recommendations: kit.co/Anthony...
    Entry Level Cameras Ideas: kit.co/Anthony...
    *Please note, I may earn a commission on some of the links above.
    📧 LET'S CONNECT:
    gugliotta.one/...
    #shorts

Комментарии • 95

  • @AnthonyGugliotta
    @AnthonyGugliotta  Год назад +94

    Film Scanner if you're curious : geni.us/9pLs

    • @baileyjerman5573
      @baileyjerman5573 Год назад +2

      Cost?

    • @Aciimov
      @Aciimov Год назад +4

      @@baileyjerman5573 click the link 🤦‍♂️

    • @akshayaram1862
      @akshayaram1862 Год назад +1

      Hello sir if someone wants to setup a IMAX 70mm theatres in India
      What are the things that will be needed first sir?

    • @nomorutr
      @nomorutr 10 месяцев назад +1

      Links not working. Do you have the model? 😅

    • @Mr.Pufferfish.
      @Mr.Pufferfish. 5 месяцев назад

      @@nomorutrIts called Kodak slide n scan

  • @elektrefiedpotato8954
    @elektrefiedpotato8954 Год назад +691

    imagine beginning ur vid with "and thats the best way"

  • @killingspree5254
    @killingspree5254 Год назад +129

    Good vid. Btw, a Plustek scanner would do a much better job tho

  • @joshuawheeler8743
    @joshuawheeler8743 Год назад +48

    i’d try starting the video with “-the fastest way to scan..” and end with and that’s the-“

    • @Reangels
      @Reangels 5 месяцев назад

      yeah but he needed to stop talking for a sec for the loop to be smoother

  • @discoverworld13
    @discoverworld13 Год назад +13

    I got this about a month ago and it's soooo worth it 👌🏻 😌

    • @sreynichkeo4034
      @sreynichkeo4034 Год назад +1

      may I know how much?

    • @eeveefever13
      @eeveefever13 Год назад

      @@sreynichkeo4034 if you mean how much the scanner costs, there's a link in the pinned comment

  • @bigg5328
    @bigg5328 Год назад +7

    Espon v600 seems like a better option for the price.

  • @VeryHandsomeAndTall
    @VeryHandsomeAndTall Год назад +12

    That’s awesome.

  • @mma.y
    @mma.y Год назад +1

    Suggestion: start the video off with "the way to turn a film negative into a digital phone is ..." and end the video with the words "and thats" and then the loop would sound like "and thats the fastest way.."
    That is if you think a better way to make a loop is to not make it seem like a loop from the get-go. But if that's your style, you do you

  • @nicklopro
    @nicklopro 3 месяца назад

    Hey I remixed this! It was my first remix. Anyway thanks for sharing Anthony. You a fellow Italian? Bada Bing!

  • @michaelbell0723
    @michaelbell0723 Год назад +1

    They should do a more pro compact version for film video cameras which would make it much simpler.

    • @xandee1000
      @xandee1000 Год назад

      Film video cameras is an oxymoron.

  • @user-hz8ci5rr3k
    @user-hz8ci5rr3k 8 месяцев назад +2

    I know it’s a ignorant question but I’m new here and my English it’s not good. So I can use this scanner right after I finish take the pictures? Or do I need to use so chemical on the film first?

  • @shaurya007
    @shaurya007 Год назад +5

    Very Impressive, But do you know another option, something cheaper?

    • @marilakos
      @marilakos Год назад +8

      Not sure if this counts as cheaper- but it’s pretty useful. You can do this exact thing in photoshop! I’ve done it before, and it’s not even that complicated; you just need to take a photo of the negative film in front of a light (or the sky), crop it, invert the color in the layer, then use the 3 eye dropper tools to modify the colours based on brightness- yeah okay it’s kinda complicated but photoshop is a really powerful tool that can do a whole lot more than converting negative film!

    • @carlan8824
      @carlan8824 Год назад

      There are ways do reveal them in photoshop using color correction

    • @user-le8ul4nr5t
      @user-le8ul4nr5t Год назад +1

      Most photo stores still develop and scan film, so if you ask nicely, they might accept to scan some already developed film for you for a reasonable price.
      The other option is to take a picture of the negaative against a backlight, then invert and correct the colors in your software of choice. In my experience it pays off to take the time to set up a good and even backlight, nailing the focus on the negative, etc. and darktable's negadoctor works pretty well, giving acceptable colors without too much work.

    • @Sebastian_Astudillo
      @Sebastian_Astudillo Год назад +1

      @@marilakos sadly if you do it that way you will loose quality, most of the time with this method you will be scanning your negatives with you phone which isn't the best way of doing it. The scanner shown in the vid isn't that great either but is way better than a phone and the light room method

    • @moritzzoellner
      @moritzzoellner 4 месяца назад

      @@Sebastian_Astudillowhy would you use a phone to scan the film??

  • @nohatemedia3786
    @nohatemedia3786 10 месяцев назад

    If you don't really need high res scans and just wanna digitize them yeah this isn't a bad option

  • @LostTerminalVideos
    @LostTerminalVideos Год назад +6

    For a recommendation for you. Don't start the video off with "and that's" because it doesn't really make sense. Have it start at "The fastest way" so it makes sense. Then at the end of the video end it with "and that's" so that it smoothly leads into the rest of the sentence once the video loops

  • @wingwong8304
    @wingwong8304 Год назад

    You should make a video of trying film photography

    • @avYhz5536
      @avYhz5536 5 месяцев назад

      i’m a film photographer and it’s quite fun, although i almost enjoy mixing the chemicals and the development process more than the actual photography

  • @AZ-kx1hq
    @AZ-kx1hq 11 месяцев назад

    What's the largest width you can feed it? I have negatives that are 2.5 inch by 4 inch and some are 4x6

  • @rudeandrotteninside
    @rudeandrotteninside 10 месяцев назад

    But what happens with panoramic strips like the ones from the hasselblad xpan

  • @murice
    @murice Год назад

    I just want to say that I am proud of @kodak.

  • @areallyrealisticguyd4333
    @areallyrealisticguyd4333 Год назад +15

    Do yourselves a favor and either get a lab scan or buy an Epson scanner meant specifically for this.

    • @Lukemasonmedia
      @Lukemasonmedia Год назад +1

      This product is literally meant specifically for this 😂 it’s made by the people who make half the film ever made

    • @niklasclaro9793
      @niklasclaro9793 Год назад +5

      Its not made by Kodak (they just put their name on it)...
      If you want to get good film scanns, either get a lab scan or get a good film scanner like an plustek 8100...

    • @areallyrealisticguyd4333
      @areallyrealisticguyd4333 Год назад +3

      ​@@LukemasonmediaI don't even think you shoot film and if you do you're probably the type of person to still send it to cvs instead of a film lab 😂

  • @mostafamxs8554
    @mostafamxs8554 Год назад

    that's coool

  • @janesh8788
    @janesh8788 7 месяцев назад

    the perfect loop doesnt exis-

  • @Gyan-n3z
    @Gyan-n3z Месяц назад

    Thank you I have to buy this because I have too much negative flims lying around in my house and my girlfriend is forcing me to throw them out

  • @Orangesoda1462
    @Orangesoda1462 Год назад

    You can also do this is Photoshop!

  • @Clairewitmore
    @Clairewitmore 11 месяцев назад

    How did I know you’d have the perfect explanation on how to do this… thx for all you do for us learning photographers 🫶🏼

  • @rubenbitoun1217
    @rubenbitoun1217 Год назад +2

    So it basically takes a photograph of a photograph

  • @DIAMCAT
    @DIAMCAT Год назад

    Can it do 110

  • @MultiSciGeek
    @MultiSciGeek 11 месяцев назад

    How good are the results tho?

    • @laugenbrezel_
      @laugenbrezel_ 8 месяцев назад

      It's pretty mediocre tbh. You are better off just giving your negatives to your local photo lab to get professional scans

  • @gbear1005
    @gbear1005 6 месяцев назад

    what is a "roll of film"?

  • @LilGamez21
    @LilGamez21 Год назад +1

    Funny that Kodak made this gadget.

  • @ddddur
    @ddddur Год назад +4

    but you'd still have to develop it right?

    • @dez967
      @dez967 Год назад

      Yeah, you can't scan photos without developing them first.

    • @killingspree5254
      @killingspree5254 Год назад

      Sure

  • @TheDrakanMaster124
    @TheDrakanMaster124 11 месяцев назад

    Can it do raw?

    • @laugenbrezel_
      @laugenbrezel_ 8 месяцев назад +1

      I think you don't really understand what RAW is...

  • @TheBrandonLeeCook
    @TheBrandonLeeCook Год назад

    Say whatttt

  • @OctaviusGeorge
    @OctaviusGeorge Год назад

    Why not a Dng?

  • @gautamtamudia464
    @gautamtamudia464 Год назад +15

    One word: photoshop
    There's 100s of tutorial lying around for help and references

    • @fab9207
      @fab9207 Год назад +14

      ? Photoshop won't go from a physical 35mm film frame to an image. If you mean after it's scanned, I think most people use lightroom because that's what it's designed for.

    • @anyboul9785
      @anyboul9785 Год назад

      @@ProperlyPsychoticplease shutup lol

  • @bennjpenn
    @bennjpenn Год назад +1

    i wouldn’t recommend one these to be honest, they provide poor quality scans and can easily scratch your negatives. a flatbed scanner like an epson v600 or a dslr/mirrorless camera scanning setup offers far better results.

  • @adnanahmadknowledgevideo
    @adnanahmadknowledgevideo Год назад

    You can do the same with Photoshop

  • @kaeptnkrunch9212
    @kaeptnkrunch9212 Год назад +1

    First i was... Oh nice...and than.... Convert it into... Jpeg....

  • @alikhairuldeen8312
    @alikhairuldeen8312 Год назад

    How do you turn Film photos into Digital photos i already have an old film camera please answer ❤

  • @columbiawoodworks5679
    @columbiawoodworks5679 Год назад +3

    walmart still does film and it's cheaper than buying this

  • @AngryNegativeHistoryProject
    @AngryNegativeHistoryProject Год назад

    Let me know if I'm wrong but isn't film only 8-10 megapixels? Why would you buy a machine to convert 8 or 10 megapixels from film when he could just buy a digital camera and get 24 or 48?

  • @lourias
    @lourias Год назад

    Kodak‽

  • @justforfun-zb3nh
    @justforfun-zb3nh 9 месяцев назад

    30k 😕

  • @__strawbinnie
    @__strawbinnie Год назад

    Orrrrrrrr an app

  • @Boxish
    @Boxish Год назад

    Wait the loop is both jarring on the first watch and on the loop. Device is fancy and interesting but might be the worst loop I’ve ever seen

  • @paulie3095
    @paulie3095 Год назад +4

    This is terrible advice coming from a professional photographer who works with film and digital

  • @brandonrivera6766
    @brandonrivera6766 Год назад

    not everything needs to be a loop video

  • @ArissonMercinova
    @ArissonMercinova Год назад

    So Kodak is still exist...

  • @guyunderyour-bed
    @guyunderyour-bed Год назад +1

    And it costs as much as an iPhone.

  • @LeftArmpitShaver
    @LeftArmpitShaver 9 месяцев назад

    The cost is wayy way to much
    Its 180$$$

  • @nbshftr
    @nbshftr Год назад +2

    this scanner is trash, avoid it

  • @CaptainPlainJaneway
    @CaptainPlainJaneway Год назад

    The best way to do something is to buy an expensive purpose-built tool that does the exact thing you need to do? My god. Please. More life hacks.

    • @AnthonyGugliotta
      @AnthonyGugliotta  Год назад

      Fastest*

    • @pavleskipina4864
      @pavleskipina4864 Год назад

      I mean as op said it IS the fastest way not a best one. If you have a dslr you could use thatt with a macro lense. Or a general high quality scanner,(2700 dpi is the minimum)

  • @aqua-bery
    @aqua-bery Год назад +1

    That's such a dumb way to do a loop

  • @jamesboston
    @jamesboston 2 месяца назад

    These mini-scanners are complete garbage. You will absolutely not get 22 megapixels of resolution. You will get a 22 megapixel file that contains maybe 2 megapixels of actual resolution. You will be massively disappointed if you buy one of these.

  • @user-wc3zs2vm4r
    @user-wc3zs2vm4r 10 месяцев назад

    And Do me a favor
    Stop using the word "and"
    at the beginning of a sentence.
    That's annoying.

  • @TheGuyWhoAsked72
    @TheGuyWhoAsked72 Год назад

    Wtf is film

  • @mostafamxs8554
    @mostafamxs8554 Год назад

    cool but i don't have old films cuz i only born on 2001 so..