Urartuians are the same armenians, just some has misread the hierogliphs in which a & u has been written in the same way so the right one should be Arata.
Ուրարտու բառը դա Ասորական Սեմիտիկ բառ է որը բազմվածն է եղել 3 Բաղաձայն տա ռից Ռ Ռ Տ = Սխալմամբ այնտեղ դրվել է Ա ձայնավորի փոխարեն Ու 👈 Այդ նույն ասորեստանի Ժամանակակիցն է նաև Հին կտակարանը ուրտեղ գրված է Արարատի թագավորություն իսկ Պարսկական և Էլամական Արձանագրության մեջ այն նշվում է Արմենիա Հարմենուա ։ Ուրարտու=Արարատ=Արմենիան Որևե կապ չունի Անատոլական քոչվոր թաթար մոնղոլոիդ խառնորդ Թուրք( Յաջուջ Մաջուջ=Գոգ մագոգ) ժողովրդի հետ որոնք այստեղ եկել են վերջիբ300֊500Տարվա մեջ և շուտով նրանք կքոչեն կիջնեն Հարաֆ արաբական թերակղզի և աֆրիկա շարունակելով իրենց քոչվորական պատմությունը ։
3:55 So basically close to Armenians, west Asian jews, Druzes, Lebanese, Assyrians and even Anatolian Greeks, and all those populations so linguistically different from each other though being genetically close
Not really. This person is very East Med shifted compared to all of the ethnic groups in that region. It's closer to a Cypriot than to an Armenian, Kurd or Eastern Turk.
Thank you. Now i am more than sure, instead of paying money to all those "ancestral dna" sites, where they charge you a lot but give very obscure information, without haplogroups, it is better to check with videos like this- much more informative and detailed. Can you also do please also Armenians of Metsamor-Lchashen culture?
Armenian, born in Yerevan. Had similar result to this Urartian almost one in one with My heritage, in this order: 73% west asian 15% south european (Greece and Italy) 12% middle eastern 3% Ashkenazi jewish
Judging by geographic cover this particular example has got more steady localisation-west asia, next to it Mediterranean and to the south middle east. If you look at the other samples the geography is more random that can include central Asia, Europe, americas
Can you please make a video about Phonecians/Judeans/Israelites or any othet Cnaanite population? Also maybe Philistines, they settled in the Levant from the sea and their origin is unknown (probably Greek)
I belong to the same subclade G-M406 but my autosomal DNA is a bit different, more ANF/CHG and less Iran_N/Natufian. Maybe my subclade has to do with bronze age anatolians like Hattians/Kaskians from central-north Anatolia
Hey Decimali👋🏼 Here my humble wishlist Modern 1)Tuvan 2)Nivkh 3)Nanai 4)Ainu 5)Khamnigan Ancient 1)Slab Grave culture 2)Zhalainur Xianbei or MNG_Xianbei 3)Pannonian Avar(East Eurasian genetic profile) 4)Early/Late Xiongnu (East Eurasian ANA/Slab grave genetic profile without or with very minor Scytho-Siberian/BMAC/Han/Sarmatian ancestries admix) 5)European Hun(East Eurasian genetic profile, samples ID for choice: MSG1; HUN001; VZ12673; KRY001)
Urartu first mention of Urartu is known from an inscription documenting the campaigns of the Assyrian king Sulmánu-asarídu I in the north (13th century BC) - although at that time the area was still called Uratri, Uruatri or Urdḫu, and its southern tribes was known. [5] [12] Kutí probably derives from the name of the Kutú people who briefly ruled Mesopotamia, but it is not known if this was really their name, or if the Assyrians sought some ancient name for their opponents out of respect for tradition. Kutík lived between Urartu proper and the region of the upper Tigris. In the 13th century BC the name Uruatri was used to describe a geographical region that included eight principalities. [7] [14] Sulmánu-asarídu defeated the local tribal confederation "in three days", i.e. probably in three strokes. This campaign was not a conquering attack - territories without a state are not difficult to conquer, but holding them is very problematic - but simply a raiding expedition, the aim was mainly to acquire slaves. [21] The Assyrian campaign in Uruatri 1275 BC affected eight kingdoms (principalities), which again suggests that the name Uruatri is only a geographical name, being the summary name of the area from the upper reaches of the Great Zab to Arzasku. River. As an alternative, the name "Land of the Khurrians" also appears, which refers to the role of the Hurrians.
I was suspicious about armenians may have been related to scythians, but as we have seen they are not related to scythians, instead they are almost ancient anatolian west asian and proto european.
@@tonguetwister2635fully wrong. Armenians Carey urartian anchestors genome in a small part %30 but Anatolian greeks don't have Zagrosian hunter gatherers genome. Kurds have a big portion of gedrosia and releated with iranic nations. Kurds are in a way indo-european and Zagrosian hunter gatherers mix. Not releated with Urartu
This is just one individual. Other Urartian-era samples look different. Some are more Transcaucasus and Iran-shifted. Others have extremely high degree of Yamnaya-like ancestry. The Urartu population was clearly diverse. The Urartian ruling class is said to have come from Musasir in northern Zagros region. How did their DNA look like? My guess, they looked like the steppe rich profiles found in Dinkha Tepe, Hasanlu & Hajji Firuz. As for Kurds, they appear to be a mix of the 3 types of profiles found in the Iron Age period of that region. Namely the Upper Mesopotamian profiles, the Iranian Plateau profiles and the Yaz Tepe Turkmenistan IronAge(proto-Iranian).
@@RandomGuy-df1oyThe Urartians spoke a different language but switched to the armenian language after joining the Armenian nation. This can be seen in genetics. All samples from the original territories of Urartu near Lake Van have such a picture and are close to the armenians.
Sizlerden ricam bana soracağım sorunun cevabını vermenizdir Urartular Ermeni halkının atalarımıdır? Urartu krallığı Ermeni asıllı devletmiydi? Vereceğiniz doğru cevaplar için teşekkür ederim 🖐️
Van Kingdom is believed to be already organised state. Though the Urartian Kings could found capitals in different places, famously the Urartian king Argishti found Erebuni, modern day Yerevan.
@wratch-gd2jqben Sivas merkez e bağlı ilbeyli köylerindenim sözlü anlatıma göre bu günkü Halep şehrine yakın bir mevkiden Sivas topraklarına gelinmiş hangi tarihte bunu bilmiyorum. Aramızda Çungar olan ve onlara benzeyen insanlarda var Çingene ve Poşa kökenli Kürt kökenli olanlarda var , eğerki bizim ata soyumuz Maveraünnehir , Harzem, Belh, gibi topraklardan geldiyse bu ihtimal çok fazla bizlerin Afganistan, Özbekistan ve Türkmenistan hatta Uygur Türkleri ile bağımız var olmalı , bizim topluluğumuz ulu Yörük topluluğudur , Osmanlı dan evvelmi kuruldu yada sonramı bunuda bilmiyoruz, belki Eratna, kadı Burhanettin devleti zamanında var olmuşda olabiliriz 🤔 belkide Moğol ilhanlı devleti zamanında Anadolu da böyle bir topluluk oluşturulmuşta olabilir, benim öğrenmek istediğim bizlerin bu günkü hangi toplum ile daha genetik olarak yakınız örnek olarak Tacik ler işlemi?
@wratch-gd2jqbizler orta Anadolu da yaşıyoruz Ulu Yörük topluluğunun orta pare koluna mensubuz ulu Yörük topluluğu hangi devlet zamanında oluşturuldu bilmiyoruz, bizim köyler arasında kara Tatar olarak bilinen Moğol asıllı Çungarlarda var
@@Eylll.123 Don't cry, Turky. Urartians are ancestors of Armenians. If you don't understand what's happening on the screen, then I'll explain it to you. These are the genetic distances of the Urartians to modern populations 3:53, and the Armenians are closest.
@@Georgiy_Sergeevich keep dreaming, the only shit you claim to steal Kurdish history is the Armenian springs hahahah today the modern descendants of Urart are the "xaldi/halid" Kurdish tribes living in Van
@@Eylll.123everybody can look at the "illustrative dna" the distance of the Urartians to modern populations, this is the work of the Estonians, and the Armenians are closest again. And the Turks are Greeks with a slight Turkic admixture. And in the east of Turkey you are generally Kurds who switched to the Turkish language. This channel is also not Armenian, it simply shows a variety of results from ancient and modern DNA samples, and these semples from the large Harvard work: the Southern Arc.
@TongueTwister not anatolian. Haplogroup G is found only in Georgia. It is also found in very few numbers in the northernmost region of Anatolia. It is not unique to Anatolia.
@@sahilkerimov8504 The majority of Chechens and Ingush are J2. Genetically, the Urartians are not similar to them at all. The Urartians are similar to the Armenians.
And again, great music. I understand your research to mean that groups which are now considered to be homogenous ethnic groups are in act a mozaic of ancient DNAs. It is very important that this be hammered into racists' skulls. Even the whitest person has"non-white" ancestors.
The Urartian language is not Indo-European. It was close to Chechen-Ingush and Georgian, and this lie is as if the Urartians were Armenians. Armenians are an Indo-European people who broke away from the Urartians!
No. Islamised Armenians in Turkey are called Hamshil Ermeni as a separate subethnic group. Until 15 c. they were Christian. They speak dialect of western Armenian, identify themselves as Armenian.
@@Darkliklik Maybe this is true for an Izmir or a Thracian, but I'm wrong. I haven't had any DNA tests done, but my opinion is that I am 25% Greek, 25% Arab, 20% Anatolian farmer and 30% Turkish. Because we were nomadic until 300 years ago and the region where I was born is a region where nomadic Turkmens are very dense. Nor am I ashamed of my Greek genes, because this is the legacy of Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great, my ancestor Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) and my ancestor Oguz Kagan are also my ancestors.
@@Darkliklik my paternal ancestry is turk and but there is a small armenian in maternal ancestry that means my forefathers fucked armenian women and assimilate them 😆
urartu is a mixture of Kurdish and Armenian, the majority of the people may be Armenian, maybe the elite were hurrian, hurrian is the ancestors of the Kurds
Dont lye to people here kurds ancestors were the medes an iranian people i know ur history later the medes seperated different tribes like zaza kurds talysh baloch ect..ur language is 100% indoeuropean armenians are a mix of urartian hurrian hatti(armenians name hayer come from non indoeuropean hattian) armenian language is not fully indoeuropean like kurdish it has a hurro urartian substrate and a huge non indoeuropean root words so its more the other way armenians are partly descent from hurrians not kurds my friend ;)
U are like the fascist turks nothing better u lying about history 😂😂 at the time of urartu u were newcomers with ur persian brothers in iran and many hundred years vassal of assyrians and later u became medes and in middle ages u became kurds kurds urartu is nice joke 😂😂😢
@@ЯкубКубоев The Armenians speak an Indo-European language , and whether they are. descended from the Urartians. has not been proven . The relationship of the Urartians. with the Northwestern Caucasians has not been proven either , but it's certainly possible .
@@robertberger4203The origin of the Armenians from the Urartians has been proven by genetics. Don't you understand what you're looking at? These 3:51 are the genetic distances of genetic samples from the capital of Urartu, and they are closest to the Armenians. The fact that they switched to the Indo-European language does not mean that they ceased to be genetically descendants of the Urartians. The origin of the northeastern Caucasians from the Urartians has never been considered by the science. Only a distant relationship with the language, nothing more.
@@robertberger4203 have you watched this video? Or read the work of one of the most prominent population genetics scientists? Genetics clearly says that Armenians are direct descendants of Urartans. Full stop. The closest modern populations to the Urartian samples are - Armenians. Full stop.
@robertolang9684 You got out of there. You are a victim of assimilation by real Turks. Because you are not genetically similar to the Ottoman Turks, you are the descendants of their subordinates.
Never doubted that Greeks to us Armenian are our closest genetical relatives. I have the same results with MyHeritage, according to this site "South European Greek/Italian" comes right second after "West Asian" for me.
@@ЯкубКубоев yes, they are direct neighbours and relatives to us. Lots of shared genetics, but also culture. Though almost the same proportion is shared with our relatives of old levantine.
@@lba6859 Armenians are really close genetically to the Greeks of eastern Anatolia. And there is a theory that the Armenian language came from Phrygian, which is related to the Greek language.
@TongueTwister Assyrian language is semitic. They are genetically semitic. Linguistics is ahead of genetics. Linguistics shows how one feels about his)her belonging. For example Urartuans and Assyrians fought against each other for decades but marriages happened as well. For example Turks and Armenians are genetically close but you cant say Turks are Armenians or vice versa
@TongueTwister no absolutely wrong. They are just changed their place of living and of course adopted that culture it is normal. I saw your comments just trolling over there and claiming false assumptions. Urartu language was Agglutinative definitely distinct from Armenian, Kurdish or Assyrian. So genetics doesn't make sense here at all, in fact Urartu = Chechen. By the way if you wonder why Assyrians are so less numerical, they were genicided by Kurds
This is the most "ass" answer I have ever heard. With your logic only Persians should decide and research about persians, only americans about America etc? By troll
According to Lazaridis and his team genetically among the modern populations the closest to Urartians are Armenians, almost of all periods and regions.
@@SuperDeeejay how hard you try the whole world knows the truth. All nations read and learn history in their books where they find out the history of Armenians. Moreover, recognize all the heritage as Armenian. And you, you keep fighting with Turks. You are 45 millions, they are 75 millions.
@@mustafa_karacaThe Urartians did not yet speak Armenian. But these are the closest modern populations to the Urartians. It is genetically the Armenians who are the descendants of the Urartians, they are the closest.
@@mustafa_karaca There are only four samples from Tushpa, the capital of Urartu, which are called Urartians in the work of Joseph Lazaridis and Reich, Southern Arc, all others that have the postscript Urartian Empire or something similar in Vahaduo are not Urartians, in the Southern Arc they are called Indo-Europeans. This is one of the samples from Tushpa, and all the samples from there are close to the Armenians.
@@mustafa_karaca Direct Quot from Southern Arc: Population continuity of the Lake Van core population with greater Levantine ancestry may well correspond to the Hurro-Urartian language family (22) that linked the non-Indo-European Urartian language of the kingdom with the earlier Bronze Age Hurrian language, whose more-southern distribution encompassed parts of Syria and Northern Mesopotamia. Into the periphery of this Hurro-Urartian linguistic sphere came a steppe-admixed population from the north, whose presence marks the southern edge of steppe expansion that we discussed above and whose proximity to the Urartian speakers would provide a mechanism for the incorporation of Urartian words into the Armenian lexicon.
@@Georgiy_Sergeevich It is visible in some 4:17, 4:40 but in all of them calculated according to the average Anatolian Turks. If northeastern Anatolia were specifically included in the lists, it would be closer to the Urartians. Because caucasus is also high in northeastern Turkey
@@luciferinizTurks may have some distant affinity with them, through the assimilation of the Armenians. But clearly much less than the Armenians, Assyrians and Mountain Jews
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Urartuians are the same armenians, just some has misread the hierogliphs in which a & u has been written in the same way so the right one should be Arata.
Ուրարտու բառը դա Ասորական Սեմիտիկ բառ է որը բազմվածն է եղել 3 Բաղաձայն տա ռից Ռ Ռ Տ = Սխալմամբ այնտեղ դրվել է Ա ձայնավորի փոխարեն Ու 👈 Այդ նույն ասորեստանի Ժամանակակիցն է նաև Հին կտակարանը ուրտեղ գրված է Արարատի թագավորություն իսկ Պարսկական և Էլամական Արձանագրության մեջ այն նշվում է Արմենիա Հարմենուա ։ Ուրարտու=Արարատ=Արմենիան Որևե կապ չունի Անատոլական քոչվոր թաթար մոնղոլոիդ խառնորդ Թուրք( Յաջուջ Մաջուջ=Գոգ մագոգ) ժողովրդի հետ որոնք այստեղ եկել են վերջիբ300֊500Տարվա մեջ և շուտով նրանք կքոչեն կիջնեն Հարաֆ արաբական թերակղզի և աֆրիկա շարունակելով իրենց քոչվորական պատմությունը ։
Իմաստություն Զգոնություն Միասնություն!!!
🤝🇦🇲✝️🇦🇲🤝✊
Great work bro👍
3:55 So basically close to Armenians, west Asian jews, Druzes, Lebanese, Assyrians and even Anatolian Greeks, and all those populations so linguistically different from each other though being genetically close
Are they considered to be Caucasian?
Majority of them ar just armenians who shifted their mother tongue.
@@georgeevernight2814
Modern Assyrians yes since they carry R1b at high frequency.
Lebanese are different though and even more distant to Armenians.
iberians are , cose to armenians abkasians georgian bronze age
distance 000000000
Do one for Ainu people
i waiting for this
Ye it would be good on especially there are already studied Ainu samples even in vahaduo
@@barguttobed can you link some?
Very cool! All was expected!
Not really.
This person is very East Med shifted compared to all of the ethnic groups in that region.
It's closer to a Cypriot than to an Armenian, Kurd or Eastern Turk.
Thank you. Now i am more than sure, instead of paying money to all those "ancestral dna" sites, where they charge you a lot but give very obscure information, without haplogroups, it is better to check with videos like this- much more informative and detailed. Can you also do please also Armenians of Metsamor-Lchashen culture?
Love your videos. keep it up
Another great video.
great work . please please test ancient elamite dna .
Yeah it’s black ..
Armenian, born in Yerevan. Had similar result to this Urartian almost one in one with My heritage, in this order:
73% west asian
15% south european (Greece and Italy)
12% middle eastern
3% Ashkenazi jewish
Amazing detail! It appears that even way back then people traveled around a lot.
Judging by geographic cover this particular example has got more steady localisation-west asia, next to it Mediterranean and to the south middle east. If you look at the other samples the geography is more random that can include central Asia, Europe, americas
Can you please make a video about Phonecians/Judeans/Israelites or any othet Cnaanite population? Also maybe Philistines, they settled in the Levant from the sea and their origin is unknown (probably Greek)
@TongueTwister Oh wow I didn't know that, that's so interesting, thank you!
Please do Andronovo and Sintashta
Haha! 2:10 He is a cousin of my great-great-... -grandfather who was G2a2b2, my haplogroup.
Великим Арарат Урарту 👍👍👍👍👊👊👊👊💣💣💣💣💣👁👁👁👁🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲
His mtdna H15b is very old and now mostly in Sweden and has many subclades
Can you also do please Armenians of Metsamor-Lchashen period, if it is possible?🙏
I belong to the same subclade G-M406 but my autosomal DNA is a bit different, more ANF/CHG and less Iran_N/Natufian. Maybe my subclade has to do with bronze age anatolians like Hattians/Kaskians from central-north Anatolia
Are you Georgian?
@@barguttobed pontic greek
According to Southern arc (Laziridis) this steppe influx came from the North east (Pontic-Caspian, Russian) rather than west
Do you know your CHG?
@@UuuhmmmTarget: es_scaled
Distance: 3.6090% / 0.03609015
48.4 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmer_TUR_Barcin_N
34.4 Caucasus_Hunter-Gatherer_GEO_CHG
11.4 Iran_Neolithic_Farmer_IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
5.6 Levant_Natufian_Hunter-Gatherer_Levant_Natufian
0.2 Pontic_Steppe_Yamnaya_Pastoralist_Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
Hey Decimali👋🏼 Here my humble wishlist
Modern
1)Tuvan
2)Nivkh
3)Nanai
4)Ainu
5)Khamnigan
Ancient
1)Slab Grave culture
2)Zhalainur Xianbei or MNG_Xianbei
3)Pannonian Avar(East Eurasian genetic profile)
4)Early/Late Xiongnu (East Eurasian ANA/Slab grave genetic profile without or with very minor Scytho-Siberian/BMAC/Han/Sarmatian ancestries admix)
5)European Hun(East Eurasian genetic profile, samples ID for choice: MSG1; HUN001; VZ12673; KRY001)
)Kyrgyz
Urartu
first mention
of Urartu is known from an inscription documenting the campaigns of the Assyrian king Sulmánu-asarídu I in the north (13th century BC) - although at that time the area was still called Uratri, Uruatri or Urdḫu, and its southern tribes was known. [5] [12] Kutí probably derives from the name of the Kutú people who briefly ruled Mesopotamia, but it is not known if this was really their name, or if the Assyrians sought some ancient name for their opponents out of respect for tradition. Kutík lived between Urartu proper and the region of the upper Tigris. In the 13th century BC the name Uruatri was used to describe a geographical region that included eight principalities. [7] [14] Sulmánu-asarídu defeated the local tribal confederation "in three days", i.e. probably in three strokes. This campaign was not a conquering attack - territories without a state are not difficult to conquer, but holding them is very problematic - but simply a raiding expedition, the aim was mainly to acquire slaves. [21] The Assyrian campaign in Uruatri 1275 BC affected eight kingdoms (principalities), which again suggests that the name Uruatri is only a geographical name, being the summary name of the area from the upper reaches of the Great Zab to Arzasku. River. As an alternative, the name "Land of the Khurrians" also appears, which refers to the role of the Hurrians.
I was suspicious about armenians may have been related to scythians, but as we have seen they are not related to scythians, instead they are almost ancient anatolian west asian and proto european.
Nothing unexpected. Even Wikipedia wrote that the Armenians are the descendants of the Urartians and other inhabitants of the Armenian highlands.
Abi sen dnaları iyi anladığında emin misin
Most of archelgolists said urartians were descanders of armenians, but we could say they were anstolian
@@tonguetwister2635fully wrong. Armenians Carey urartian anchestors genome in a small part %30 but Anatolian greeks don't have Zagrosian hunter gatherers genome. Kurds have a big portion of gedrosia and releated with iranic nations. Kurds are in a way indo-european and Zagrosian hunter gatherers mix. Not releated with Urartu
No they are Caucasian not Armenian, they don't even speak an Indo-European language.
This is just one individual.
Other Urartian-era samples look different. Some are more Transcaucasus and Iran-shifted.
Others have extremely high degree of Yamnaya-like ancestry.
The Urartu population was clearly diverse.
The Urartian ruling class is said to have come from Musasir in northern Zagros region.
How did their DNA look like?
My guess, they looked like the steppe rich profiles found in Dinkha Tepe, Hasanlu & Hajji Firuz.
As for Kurds, they appear to be a mix of the 3 types of profiles found in the Iron Age period of that region.
Namely the Upper Mesopotamian profiles, the Iranian Plateau profiles and the Yaz Tepe Turkmenistan IronAge(proto-Iranian).
@@JohnDoe10350all samples from the original territories of Urartu near Lake Van have such a picture and are close to the Armenians
@@RandomGuy-df1oyThe Urartians spoke a different language but switched to the armenian language after joining the Armenian nation. This can be seen in genetics. All samples from the original territories of Urartu near Lake Van have such a picture and are close to the armenians.
О, да наши предки!!!
hi im %71 urartian, im from eastern turkey. i love van museum
In this case, Barev dzes.
Sizlerden ricam bana soracağım sorunun cevabını vermenizdir Urartular Ermeni halkının atalarımıdır? Urartu krallığı Ermeni asıllı devletmiydi? Vereceğiniz doğru cevaplar için teşekkür ederim 🖐️
Yok Ermeni değiller ama Ermenilerin en büyük genetik atalarından biri aynı zamanda.
Van Kingdom is believed to be already organised state. Though the Urartian Kings could found capitals in different places, famously the Urartian king Argishti found Erebuni, modern day Yerevan.
Hayır!
@@lionandlionessYes. Genetics confirms this. But they spoke a different language then.
Evet!!!
Please do one about Georgians, thank you.
I can't understand they call Northern African DNA as Sephardic Jewish :))
Abi adamda araplık hiç çıkmadı myheritage %40a yakın araplık gösteriyor
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjci Read Sea yazıyor ne çıkmadı :/
My heirtage yapar böyle seyler
@@Wassupdudee dikkat etmemişim
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjci Ortadoğu direk Arap değil hacı, Kuzey Semitikler ile alakalı muhtemelen.
Ottoman Empire, would you do a DNA test?
@wratch-gd2jqbizler Türkiye de yaşayan Yörükler Türkmenler daha çok Özbekistan Türkleri Afganistan halkı ve Türkmenistan Türkleri ile aynımıyız?
@wratch-gd2jqben Sivas merkez e bağlı ilbeyli köylerindenim sözlü anlatıma göre bu günkü Halep şehrine yakın bir mevkiden Sivas topraklarına gelinmiş hangi tarihte bunu bilmiyorum. Aramızda Çungar olan ve onlara benzeyen insanlarda var Çingene ve Poşa kökenli Kürt kökenli olanlarda var , eğerki bizim ata soyumuz Maveraünnehir , Harzem, Belh, gibi topraklardan geldiyse bu ihtimal çok fazla bizlerin Afganistan, Özbekistan ve Türkmenistan hatta Uygur Türkleri ile bağımız var olmalı , bizim topluluğumuz ulu Yörük topluluğudur , Osmanlı dan evvelmi kuruldu yada sonramı bunuda bilmiyoruz, belki Eratna, kadı Burhanettin devleti zamanında var olmuşda olabiliriz 🤔 belkide Moğol ilhanlı devleti zamanında Anadolu da böyle bir topluluk oluşturulmuşta olabilir, benim öğrenmek istediğim bizlerin bu günkü hangi toplum ile daha genetik olarak yakınız örnek olarak Tacik ler işlemi?
@wratch-gd2jqbizler orta Anadolu da yaşıyoruz Ulu Yörük topluluğunun orta pare koluna mensubuz ulu Yörük topluluğu hangi devlet zamanında oluşturuldu bilmiyoruz, bizim köyler arasında kara Tatar olarak bilinen Moğol asıllı Çungarlarda var
Closest are armenians, not surprise.
Not armenian
@@Eylll.123 Don't cry, Turky. Urartians are ancestors of Armenians. If you don't understand what's happening on the screen, then I'll explain it to you. These are the genetic distances of the Urartians to modern populations 3:53, and the Armenians are closest.
@@Georgiy_Sergeevich keep dreaming, the only shit you claim to steal Kurdish history is the Armenian springs hahahah today the modern descendants of Urart are the "xaldi/halid" Kurdish tribes living in Van
@@Georgiy_Sergeevich haha yes DNA tests prepared by Armenians from various applications
@@Eylll.123everybody can look at the "illustrative dna" the distance of the Urartians to modern populations, this is the work of the Estonians, and the Armenians are closest again. And the Turks are Greeks with a slight Turkic admixture. And in the east of Turkey you are generally Kurds who switched to the Turkish language. This channel is also not Armenian, it simply shows a variety of results from ancient and modern DNA samples, and these semples from the large Harvard work: the Southern Arc.
Легендарнии армянское нагорье 👍👍👍👍💣💣💣💣🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲
Ottoman sample please
Caucasian haplogrup
@TongueTwister not anatolian. Haplogroup G is found only in Georgia. It is also found in very few numbers in the northernmost region of Anatolia. It is not unique to Anatolia.
Chechen or İngush origins
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjci there is a specific clade of G2a found predominantly in Caucasus. G-M406 is more anatolian
@@sahilkerimov8504 The majority of Chechens and Ingush are J2. Genetically, the Urartians are not similar to them at all. The Urartians are similar to the Armenians.
@@sahilkerimov8504do you see Chechens or Ingush here 3:54? Urartians are similar to Armenians, some Jews, Assyrians and Anatolian Greeks.
Why would you use my heritage and not ancestry or at least accurate edition of 23nme 😂😂.
Please Gokturk princess Ashina!
make ainu bro
+
turkey invased on that teritori only in 14century
(Yrarty)ARARTA🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲
Urartians and Sumerians were Armenians. Simple fact backed up by more and more research as time goes by.
😂😂😂
Copium.
Urartu yes, Sumerian idk where tf you got that from they are related to Iranians and Iraqis mostly
And again, great music. I understand your research to mean that groups which are now considered to be homogenous ethnic groups are in act a mozaic of ancient DNAs. It is very important that this be hammered into racists' skulls. Even the whitest person has"non-white" ancestors.
Armenians and assyrians are closest to Urartians ❤
*modern Assyrians.
Ancient Assyrians hated these people.
Modern Assyrians are just Armenians who carry R1b.
He was probably some kind of dark olive skinned
From the gulf states please 😉😉😉
No
Use original camel words instead wannabe westerner with that name
@@Alghi451 are you Hindi
@@johnsotanriyiover4138 ofc no kalb ghabi
100% indian
The Urartian language is not Indo-European. It was close to Chechen-Ingush and Georgian, and this lie is as if the Urartians were Armenians. Armenians are an Indo-European people who broke away from the Urartians!
Were Armenians who converted to Islam absorbed into the Kurdish people in the same
way that Greek's who converted to Islam became Turk's?
No. Islamised Armenians in Turkey are called Hamshil Ermeni as a separate subethnic group. Until 15 c. they were Christian. They speak dialect of western Armenian, identify themselves as Armenian.
Levantine. Since Iraqi Jews represent the actual Jewish, it's how Jewish and Abraham's genetics should have been.
Great ancestors of chechen people❤
But there isnt chechen in modern close populations
uartians came from the caucasus mountains?
@@RichardEdwards40 no, most likely upper Mesopotamia
@@mehmeterenoz9229 Nah ermenileri kizdirmak için yazdim😀
@@es8994 but his DNA is like a mix of Caucasian and Anatolian farmer. this thesis is wrong.
Similar to modern Iraqi result, nice 👌👍
Urartu is close to the Armenians. From Iraq they are close only to Jews.
Very distant from Iraqis man. Iraqi Jews are an isolated minority.
The Great Armenia ☝
😂😂😂 it was a good joke
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjci your blood ancestors are Greeks 🤣
@@Darkliklik Maybe this is true for an Izmir or a Thracian, but I'm wrong. I haven't had any DNA tests done, but my opinion is that I am 25% Greek, 25% Arab, 20% Anatolian farmer and 30% Turkish. Because we were nomadic until 300 years ago and the region where I was born is a region where nomadic Turkmens are very dense. Nor am I ashamed of my Greek genes, because this is the legacy of Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great, my ancestor Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) and my ancestor Oguz Kagan are also my ancestors.
@@Darkliklik my paternal ancestry is turk and but there is a small armenian in maternal ancestry that means my forefathers fucked armenian women and assimilate them 😆
@@mehmeterenoz9229 Nothing proud about it, cause basically you insulting on your grandma or foremothers
Ottoman empire Halep turkmen dna test please
🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲❤
urartu is a mixture of Kurdish and Armenian, the majority of the people may be Armenian, maybe the elite were hurrian, hurrian is the ancestors of the Kurds
Ancestors of kurds medians. Hurrians were long ago mingled and assimilated by Urartians.
Dont lye to people here kurds ancestors were the medes an iranian people i know ur history later the medes seperated different tribes like zaza kurds talysh baloch ect..ur language is 100% indoeuropean armenians are a mix of urartian hurrian hatti(armenians name hayer come from non indoeuropean hattian) armenian language is not fully indoeuropean like kurdish it has a hurro urartian substrate and a huge non indoeuropean root words so its more the other way armenians are partly descent from hurrians not kurds my friend ;)
U are like the fascist turks nothing better u lying about history 😂😂 at the time of urartu u were newcomers with ur persian brothers in iran and many hundred years vassal of assyrians and later u became medes and in middle ages u became kurds kurds urartu is nice joke 😂😂😢
@@lba6859 You should know how races are formed. We have hurrian DNA, mannean and Kurdish
@@varg3952 The Urartians are not exactly Hurrian and the incoming Aryan migrations assimilated the people who formed the halaf culture
Tollund Man, Grauballe Man, Huldremose Woman
❤
The Urartu people may be the ancestors of peoples of the Caucasus such as the Chechens and others .
Urartians are the ancestors of the Armenians. This can be seen in genetics. The Urartians are very distant genetically from the Chechens.
Look at the tables of the closeness to modern populations. What's the percentage of closeness with chechens? Ingush?
@@ЯкубКубоев The Armenians speak an Indo-European language , and whether they are. descended from the Urartians. has not been proven . The relationship of the Urartians. with the Northwestern Caucasians has not been proven either , but it's certainly possible .
@@robertberger4203The origin of the Armenians from the Urartians has been proven by genetics. Don't you understand what you're looking at? These 3:51 are the genetic distances of genetic samples from the capital of Urartu, and they are closest to the Armenians. The fact that they switched to the Indo-European language does not mean that they ceased to be genetically descendants of the Urartians. The origin of the northeastern Caucasians from the Urartians has never been considered by the science. Only a distant relationship with the language, nothing more.
@@robertberger4203 have you watched this video? Or read the work of one of the most prominent population genetics scientists? Genetics clearly says that Armenians are direct descendants of Urartans. Full stop. The closest modern populations to the Urartian samples are - Armenians. Full stop.
Anatoian Native
*Armenian Highlander
@@DersimiteaRmEnİaN 🤣
@@Wassupdudee turkgay
@robertolang9684 You got out of there. You are a victim of assimilation by real Turks. Because you are not genetically similar to the Ottoman Turks, you are the descendants of their subordinates.
@robertolang9684You got out of there. Victim of assimilation.
53.7 pure Greek.Wellcome to big greek family
Toni
Never doubted that Greeks to us Armenian are our closest genetical relatives. I have the same results with MyHeritage, according to this site "South European Greek/Italian" comes right second after "West Asian" for me.
Only Anatolian Greeks. And closest are Armenians.
@@ЯкубКубоев yes, they are direct neighbours and relatives to us. Lots of shared genetics, but also culture. Though almost the same proportion is shared with our relatives of old levantine.
@@lba6859 Armenians are really close genetically to the Greeks of eastern Anatolia. And there is a theory that the Armenian language came from Phrygian, which is related to the Greek language.
The Urartu language is purely understood by Chechens and it is a fact. Urartu was ancestors of Chechens
@TongueTwister Assyrian language is semitic. They are genetically semitic. Linguistics is ahead of genetics. Linguistics shows how one feels about his)her belonging. For example Urartuans and Assyrians fought against each other for decades but marriages happened as well. For example Turks and Armenians are genetically close but you cant say Turks are Armenians or vice versa
@TongueTwister no absolutely wrong. They are just changed their place of living and of course adopted that culture it is normal. I saw your comments just trolling over there and claiming false assumptions.
Urartu language was Agglutinative definitely distinct from Armenian, Kurdish or Assyrian. So genetics doesn't make sense here at all, in fact Urartu = Chechen.
By the way if you wonder why Assyrians are so less numerical, they were genicided by Kurds
@TongueTwister neither.
This is the most "ass" answer I have ever heard. With your logic only Persians should decide and research about persians, only americans about America etc?
By troll
Were DNA from us Yazidis also taken into account in the results?
Aq qoyunlu dna test results?
It's Kurdish. Stop taking Kurdish history 🤦♀️
The table of closeness on 3:51
No. Kurdish are close to Mannaeans and Midians, not Urartians.
Wan kurdistan
Iran is kurdistan
Its Kurdish and some armenian tribes . Ww havec10 people who lives around Bitlis in turkey who still can Urartu language. And they are KURDS.....
According to Lazaridis and his team genetically among the modern populations the closest to Urartians are Armenians, almost of all periods and regions.
You keep fighting with Turks over Armenian lands, heritage even the language😂
@@lba6859 No armenian lake wan and upp. You are 3-4 miljon. We are 45 miljon lake wan and down......go and fix your fake history
@@SuperDeeejay how hard you try the whole world knows the truth. All nations read and learn history in their books where they find out the history of Armenians. Moreover, recognize all the heritage as Armenian. And you, you keep fighting with Turks. You are 45 millions, they are 75 millions.
@@SuperDeeejay don't forget to read the lazaridis's work- it's fresh and new, 2022. Educate yourself😂
Sumer Urartiu Armenia Ararat 🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲
I’m Armenian, but I’m not sure of the percentage.😭🥲 My dads side of the family originated from Armenia in the 1890’s
ARMENIAN KINGDOM
😂😂😂😂
@@mustafa_karacaThe Urartians did not yet speak Armenian. But these are the closest modern populations to the Urartians. It is genetically the Armenians who are the descendants of the Urartians, they are the closest.
@@ЯкубКубоев no. there are various samplles about urartians and based on the samples in vahuduo they are closest to western azerbaijanis
@@mustafa_karaca There are only four samples from Tushpa, the capital of Urartu, which are called Urartians in the work of Joseph Lazaridis and Reich, Southern Arc, all others that have the postscript Urartian Empire or something similar in Vahaduo are not Urartians, in the Southern Arc they are called Indo-Europeans. This is one of the samples from Tushpa, and all the samples from there are close to the Armenians.
@@mustafa_karaca Direct Quot from Southern Arc: Population continuity of the Lake Van core population with greater Levantine ancestry may well correspond to the Hurro-Urartian language family (22) that linked the non-Indo-European Urartian language of the kingdom with the earlier Bronze Age Hurrian language, whose more-southern distribution encompassed parts of Syria and Northern Mesopotamia. Into the periphery of this Hurro-Urartian linguistic sphere came a steppe-admixed population from the north, whose presence marks the southern edge of steppe expansion that we discussed above and whose proximity to the Urartian speakers would provide a mechanism for the incorporation of Urartian words into the Armenian lexicon.
ancinet💀💀💀
Looks like Turks from eastern Black Sea and Erzurum province
But the Turks themselves are not visible in close populations. There are Armenians, Assyrians and some Jews.
@@Georgiy_Sergeevich It is visible in some 4:17, 4:40 but in all of them calculated according to the average Anatolian Turks. If northeastern Anatolia were specifically included in the lists, it would be closer to the Urartians. Because caucasus is also high in northeastern Turkey
@@luciferinizThe northeastern Turks are much further than the Armenians from the Urartians, I saw such calculations, they are in Illustrative DNA.
@@luciferinizTurks may have some distant affinity with them, through the assimilation of the Armenians. But clearly much less than the Armenians, Assyrians and Mountain Jews
@@luciferinizThe northeastern Turks are much further than the Armenians from the Urartians, I saw such calculations, they are in Illustrative DNA.