JFK 1

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 дек 2024

Комментарии • 57

  • @mhrobotguy1709
    @mhrobotguy1709 5 месяцев назад

    Do you have any still shots of the signs in the buildings? It would be nice if they were added to the video. Thanks for creating and posting.

    • @kellyfish1957
      @kellyfish1957  5 месяцев назад

      Not sure what signs you mean.. I have a ton of stills but didn't take any shots of the info placards. in the museum.

  • @ottospecht8438
    @ottospecht8438 26 дней назад +2

    Horrible soundtrack 🎶🎶🎶🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤮

  • @stevenpugmire3880
    @stevenpugmire3880 5 месяцев назад

    thank you

  • @dab.
    @dab. 24 дня назад

    Your footage from behind the fence shows how difficult it would have been to hit a target moving from left to right. Oswald had an easy shot from the sixth floor, with the target moving away.
    What do you believe was in the parcel? Curtain rods? Why make a custom brown paper wrapping with paper from the TSBD just for curtain rods? Where did the curtain rods come from? What happened to the curtain rods? Why did he need curtain rods at his rooming house, which already had rods? Why did Oswald deny to the police ever having a parcel at all; only his lunch?
    You can probably tell, I believe the package contained a rifle.
    Btw, the first X on the street is the second shot. The first shot missed.

    • @KennethPoole-y7z
      @KennethPoole-y7z 20 дней назад +1

      Frazier was clear that the parcel was too short to contain even a dismantled Carcano.

    • @9Ballr
      @9Ballr 20 дней назад

      @@KennethPoole-y7z Frazier was wrong. The sack was 38 inches long. It is WC Exhibit 142.

    • @dab.
      @dab. 20 дней назад

      @@KennethPoole-y7z Frazier wasn't clear at all. He consistently said, several times, that he wasn't paying attention to the parcel. Read the testimony.
      And you didn't answer the question - why did Oswald deny having a long parcel at all - only his lunch - effectively saying that Frazier and his sister were both lying?

    • @dab.
      @dab. 19 дней назад

      @KennethPoole-y7z No, he wasn't clear about that. He said that he only "glanced" at the package and that he "wasn't paying it much attention".

    • @KennethPoole-y7z
      @KennethPoole-y7z 19 дней назад

      @@dab. No, he said it was too short and that LHO held it with a cupped hand underneath and tucked under his armpit.

  • @darrellclaire5090
    @darrellclaire5090 5 месяцев назад

    Kelly, I've been there and have studied the event. And I'm among those folks, who believe that LHA was alone and got 3-shots off. The 1st shot hit the light-standard and richocheted to the far curb, with fragments hitting a man further away.

    • @kellyfish1957
      @kellyfish1957  5 месяцев назад +3

      Count the time between the first shot, frame 210 -215 and the Connolly shot at frame 236 -238. It's 1.6 seconds. Not enough time to cycle the bolt action and re-fire. One shooter is not physically possible.

    • @9Ballr
      @9Ballr 5 месяцев назад

      @@kellyfish1957 The first shot is estimated to be around frame 155, the second shot at frame 224. That's 69 frames at 18.3 frames per second, for about 3.7 to 3.8 seconds between the first and second shot.

    • @9Ballr
      @9Ballr 5 месяцев назад

      @@kellyfish1957 It's very clear in the Zapruder film that JFK and Connally react to getting hit by the same bullet, around frame 224.

    • @dab.
      @dab. 24 дня назад

      @@kellyfish1957 No the first shot was much earlier, before the car disappeared behind the sign. Look at the Z film. You can see Connally and Jackie both suddenly turn to their right to look towards the sound of the first shot - Connally starts to turn at frame 160 and jackie already turning by frame 170. Allowing for reaction time, that places the first shot at around frame 155.
      Connally and Kennedy were hit by the second shot, while the limo was behind the sign. You can see them both reacting at the same time as the car re-emerges. Look at frame 222 and see how Connally has clearly already been hit - his head thrown back with expression of pain. Kennedy re-appears at frame 225, raising his hands to his throat, already hit.
      That allows around 3.5 seconds between first and second shots.

    • @KennethPoole-y7z
      @KennethPoole-y7z 20 дней назад

      @@9Ballr Not so.

  • @bluzzedude8111
    @bluzzedude8111 5 месяцев назад

    It's funny how when they arrested Oswald, he attempted to shoot a cop with the same gun he had just used to murder a police officer 10 minutes before!

    • @kellyfish1957
      @kellyfish1957  5 месяцев назад +1

      The fact that he drew his revolver in the movie theater certainly suggests guilt. Maybe guilt over JD Tippett. As far as his role at the book depository, ask yourself this, would anyone commit the assassination with absolutely NO escape plan? Oswald was smarter than that.

    • @bluzzedude8111
      @bluzzedude8111 5 месяцев назад

      @@kellyfish1957 Oswald totally expected to get killed. Did you ever hear of a "consciousness of guilt"? Oswald displayed that from the time he dropped his rifle behind the book case's right up to his arrest.

    • @kellyfish1957
      @kellyfish1957  5 месяцев назад +1

      @@bluzzedude8111 In 1963 the police were definitely more trigger happy however, if your theory is true, why did he try to evade capture?

    • @9Ballr
      @9Ballr 5 месяцев назад

      @@kellyfish1957 He said that Oswald expected to get killed, not that he wanted to get killed.

    • @KennethPoole-y7z
      @KennethPoole-y7z 20 дней назад +1

      Witnesses put LHO in the theatre at 1:07, the time Tippit was shot. LHO could not have shot Tippit.